Manual for the Preparation of Legislation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Grenzeloos Actuariaat
grenzeloos actuariaat BRON: WIKIPEDIA grenzeloos actuariaat: voor u geselecteerd uit de buitenlandse bladen q STATE OPENING OF PARLIAMENT In the United Kingdom, the State Opening of Parliament is an the Commons Chamber due to a custom initiated in the seventeenth annual event that marks the commencement of a session of the century. In 1642, King Charles I entered the Commons Chamber and Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is held in the House of Lords attempted to arrest five members. The Speaker famously defied the Chamber, usually in late October or November, or in a General King, refusing to inform him as to where the members were hiding. Election year, when the new Parliament first assembles. In 1974, Ever since that incident, convention has held that the monarch cannot when two General Elections were held, there were two State enter the House of Commons. Once on the Throne, the Queen, wearing Openings. the Imperial State Crown, instructs the house by saying, ‘My Lords, pray be seated’, she then motions the Lord Great Chamberlain to summon the House of Commons. PREPARATION The State Opening is a lavish ceremony. First, the cellars of the Palace SUMMONING OF THE COMMONS of Westminster are searched by the Yeomen of the Guard in order to The Lord Great Chamberlain raises his wand of office to signal to the prevent a modern-day Gunpowder Plot. The Plot of 1605 involved a Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, who has been waiting in the failed attempt by English Catholics to blow up the Houses of Commons lobby. -
Standing Orders Proceedings of the House of Lords
HOUSE OF LORDS COMPANION TO THE STANDING ORDERS AND GUIDE TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS Laid before the House by the Clerk of the Parliaments 2007 PREFACE This is the 21st edition of the Companion to the Standing Orders of the House of Lords since Sir John Shaw-Lefevre, then Clerk of the Parliaments, compiled his first edition for private circulation in 1862. It is issued with the authority of the Procedure Committee. The House and its procedures have changed much in recent years, and continue to do so. This edition of the Companion reflects two particularly significant changes. First, on 4 July 2006 for the first time the House elected a Lord Speaker. Secondly, the Minutes of Proceedings have been replaced by the new publication House of Lords Business from the start of session 2006-07. The Companion is the authoritative guide to procedure, but it is by no means the only source of information for members. Others are the Handbook on facilities and services, booklets on participation in legislative business (from the Public Bill Office) and the General Guide to the Members’ Reimbursement Allowance Scheme (from the Finance Department). All such guidance is available on line. The Table Clerks and procedural offices are always available to advise members. PAUL HAYTER Clerk of the Parliaments i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: THE HOUSE AND ITS MEMBERSHIP ........................1 Composition of the House.......................................................................1 Disqualification for membership.............................................................1 -
Pro Forma Bills and Parliamentary Independence from the Crown
Pro Forma Bills and Parliamentary Independence from the Crown by Bruce M. Hicks Historically, before the Speech from the Throne may be tabled, let alone debated, in each chamber of Parliament a private members’ public bill was introduced ‘pro forma’ (meaning for form’s sake). This tradition goes back 400 years in Britain and like many ancient traditions some of its significance has been 2009 CanLIIDocs 308 forgotten over time. In 2008, the Canadian Government broke with that tradition and introduced government bills summarizing the claim of privilege it identified as being enjoyed by each chamber. This paper reviews the history of ‘pro forma’ bills, placing them in their original context so as to show that the claim of privileges and rights, all of which were fought for and obtained before the advent of responsible government and are the cornerstones of the legislative branch of government, are more multilayered than is described in these two new bills. It notes that the very act of substituting these new bills is reflective of the increasing domination of the legislative agenda by the Crown. It concludes by recommending that the new format be modified and that MPs and Senators who are not Ministers or Parliamentary Secretaries be selected as movers for the ‘pro forma’ bill, and that bills be chosen that better embrace the full breadth of rights and privileges claimed by the Commons, the Senate and members of Parliament. he following exchange took place when the Mr. Goodale: Mr. Speaker, dealing with Bill C-1 House of Commons met for the first time in the proceedings at the opening of a Parliament following the 2008 election and the Prime is largely a symbolic gesture, as described in T Marleau and Montpetit, to assert Parliament’s Minister moved for leave to introduce Bill C-1, right to act as it sees fit quite apart from what respecting the administration of oaths of office. -
House of Lords Official Report
Vol. 812 Tuesday No. 1 11 May 2021 PARLIAMENTARYDEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDEROFBUSINESS Queen’s Speech.......................................................................................................................1 Select Vestries Bill First Reading ......................................................................................................................4 Queen’s Speech Debate (1st Day) ...............................................................................................................4 Senior Deputy Speaker........................................................................................................20 Lords wishing to be supplied with these Daily Reports should give notice to this effect to the Printed Paper Office. No proofs of Daily Reports are provided. Corrections for the bound volume which Lords wish to suggest to the report of their speeches should be clearly indicated in a copy of the Daily Report, which, with the column numbers concerned shown on the front cover, should be sent to the Editor of Debates, House of Lords, within 14 days of the date of the Daily Report. This issue of the Official Report is also available on the Internet at https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2021-05-11 In Hybrid sittings, [V] after a Member’s name indicates that they contributed by video call. The following abbreviations are used to show a Member’s party affiliation: Abbreviation Party/Group CB Cross Bench Con Conservative DUP Democratic Unionist Party GP Green Party Ind Lab Independent Labour Ind LD Independent Liberal Democrat Ind SD Independent Social Democrat Ind UU Independent Ulster Unionist Lab Labour Lab Co-op Labour and Co-operative Party LD Liberal Democrat LD Ind Liberal Democrat Independent Non-afl Non-affiliated PC Plaid Cymru UKIP UK Independence Party UUP Ulster Unionist Party No party affiliation is given for Members serving the House in a formal capacity, the Lords spiritual, Members on leave of absence or Members who are otherwise disqualified from sitting in the House. -
House of Lords Companion to the Standing Orders
Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords Laid before the House by the Clerk of the Parliaments 2017 PREFACE This is the 25th edition of the Companion to the Standing Orders of the House of Lords since Sir John Shaw-Lefevre, then Clerk of the Parliaments, compiled his first edition for private circulation in 1862. It is issued with the authority of the Procedure Committee. The Companion is the authoritative guide to procedure, but it is by no means the only source of information for members. Guidance on key elements of procedure and taking part in business are given in the Short Guide to Practice and Procedure in the Chamber and Grand Committee and the booklets on participation in legislative business issued by the Legislation Office,1 while general services are covered in the Handbook on Facilities and Services for Members and their staff.2 Members may also consult the Guide to the Code of Conduct,3 the Guide to Financial Support for Members4 (from the Finance Department). The Table Clerks and procedural offices are always available to advise members. DAVID BEAMISH Clerk of the Parliaments 1 https://intranet.parliament.uk/business-news/parliamentary-business/guidance-and-handbooks/ procedure-and-practice/ 2 https://intranet.parliament.uk/business-news/parliamentary-business/guidance-and-handbooks/ facilities-handbook/ 3 http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-financial-interests/house-of-lords- commissioner-for-standards-/code-of-conduct-for-the-house-of-lords/ 4 http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords/whos-in-the-house-of-lords/house-of-lords-expenses/ #jump-link-3 iii iv ABBREVIATIONS Erskine May Erskine May’s Treatise on The Law, Privileges and Usage of Parliament, 24th edition, 2011 GO General Order (see paragraph 9.96) HL Deb. -
House of Lords
HOUSE OF LORDS Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords Laid on the table by the Clerk of the Parliaments 2010 Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords Laid before the House by the Clerk of the Parliaments 2010 PREFACE This is the 22nd edition of the Companion to the Standing Orders of the House of Lords since Sir John Shaw-Lefevre, then Clerk of the Parliaments, compiled his first edition for private circulation in 1862. It is issued with the authority of the Procedure Committee. The House and its procedures have changed much in recent years, and continue to do so. This edition of the Companion reflects two particularly significant changes. First, on 1 October 2009 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom formally came into being, and the historic judicature of the House of Lords came to an end. Secondly, events in 2009 focused attention on the House’s procedures for regulating the conduct of its members; in response the House agreed new procedures for investigating complaints, asserted new disciplinary powers and, on 30 November 2009, agreed a new Code of Conduct. These are reflected in Chapter 5. The Companion is the authoritative guide to procedure, but it is by no means the only source of information for members. Others are the Handbook on facilities and services for Members, booklets on participation in legislative business (from the Public Bill Office) and the General Guide to the Members’ Reimbursement Scheme (from the Finance Department). -
A Parliament Act
International Law Research; Vol. 10, No. 1; 2021 ISSN 1927-5234 E-ISSN 1927-5242 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Modernising the Constitution - A Parliament Act Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 6, 2021 Accepted: February 3, 2021 Online Published: February 12, 2021 doi:10.5539/ilr.v10n1p101 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v10n1p101 A previous article has looked at modernising the law on the Crown, see Modernising the Constitution - A Crown Act.1 This article looks at the same in respect of Parliament. It may be noted, from the outset, that the legislation - and common law - on Parliament, is much simpler and less complicated than that on the Crown. Indeed, a large amount of this legislation is administrative (mundane) in nature. Also, much is non-contentious, having given rise to little caselaw. Further, there is a compelling case for consolidation since there are, presently, c. 68 Acts relating to Parliament, but they contain only c. 280 sections and much of the same is obsolete or couched in antiquated language which is scarcely intelligible. Thus, the essential issues are the following: Consolidation of Parliamentary Legislation; Modernising Crown Prerogatives relating to Parliament. In the latter case, most Crown prerogatives are now obsolete - as reflects the position after the Glorious Revolution of 1688. And, the few worth retaining should be placed in legislation - in order to give greater consistency and coherency to the same. -
Journal of the Society of Clerks-At-The-T Able In
VOL. 86 FOR 2018 T H E J O U R N A L O F T H E S OC I E T Y O F C L E R K S - AT- T H E - TA B L E I N C OMMONWE A LT H PA R L I AME N T S VOLUME 87 2019 £15.00 Journal of the Society of Clerks-at-the-Table in Commonwealth Parliaments Please check colours, board and finish with Kinnaird marketing Green and red should match Vol.75 2007 edition???? The Table THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CLERKS-AT-THE-TABLE IN COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTS EDITED BY LUKE HUSSEY VOLUME 87 2019 THE SOCIETY OF CLERKS-AT-THE-TABLE IN COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTS HOUSE OF LORDS LONDON SW1A 0PW The Table 2019 ©The Society of Clerks-at-the-Table in Commonwealth Parliaments 2019 ISBN 0-904979-44-X ISSN 0264-7133 CONTENTS Editorial 1 Archibald Milman and the failure of supply reform 1882-1888 7 COLIN LEE Queen's Consent 35 ANDREW MAKOWER Uncharted territory: Ontario and the notwithstanding clause 45 JOCELYN MCCAULEY Is the official Opposition official? 49 MICHAEL TATHAM The provision of security in the legislative precints in Ontario 57 WILLIAM WONG Foreign allegiances and the constitutional disqualification of members 62 CATHERINE CORNISH The Electoral Boundaries Bill in Yukon 71 LINDA KOLODY Miscellaneous notes 77 Comparative study: the role of the Opposition 138 Privilege 180 Standing orders 197 Sitting days 215 Unparliamentary expressions 218 Books on Parliament in 2018 230 Index 248 iii The Table The Journal of the Society of Clerks-at-the-Table in Commonwealth Parliaments EDITORIAL This year’s edition of The Table first sees Colin Lee, a Principal Clerk in the UK House of Commons, consider the challenges faced at Westminster in the 1880s of reforming Supply proceedings (the method by which the House of Commons made provision for the statutory authorisation of public expenditure subject to annual control). -
7. Pro Forma the Term Pro Forma
7. Pro forma The term pro forma (Latin for "as a matter of form" or "for the sake of form") or adjective "pro-forma" is most often used to describe a practice or document that is provided as a courtesy and/or satisfies minimum requirements, conforms to a norm or doctrine, tends to be performed perfunctorily and/or is considered a formality. 7.1 Accounting The pro forma accounting is a statement of the company's financial activities while excluding "unusual and nonrecurring transactions" when stating how much money the company actually made. Expenses often excluded from pro forma results include company restructuring costs, a decline in the value of the company's investments, or other accounting charges, such as adjusting the current balance sheet to fix faulty accounting practices in previous years. There was a boom in the reporting of pro forma results in the USA starting in the late 1990s, with many dot-com companies using the technique to recast their losses as profits, or at least to show smaller losses than the US GAAP accounting showed. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requires publicly traded companies in the United States to report US GAAP-based financial results, and has cautioned companies that using pro forma results to obscure US GAAP results would be considered fraud if used to mislead investors. 7.1 Business 7.1.1 Financial statements In business, pro forma financial statements are prepared in advance of a planned transaction, such as a merger, an acquisition, a new capital investment, or a change in capital structure such as incurrence of new debt or issuance of equity. -
Explanatory Note New South Wales Hansard Forms Manual
[1] EXPLANATORY NOTE NEW SOUTH WALES HANSARD FORMS MANUAL ABSENCE Governor................................................................................................................................................................... See reference to GOVERNOR. ABSENCE Member..................................................................................................................................................................... The Constitution Act and the standing orders of the respective Houses provide that a member's seat becomes vacant if the member fails to attend one whole session of the House, unless the member has been given leave of absence by the House and that fact has been "entered upon its journals". If the member is a Minister or holds some other office, e.g., Government Whip, refer not to the portfolio or office, but only to the electorate. For temporary absences, such as the absence of a Minister from question time, see MINISTRY at page 11. [2] EXPLANATORY NOTE NEW SOUTH WALES HANSARD FORMS MANUAL ABSENCE Presiding Officers .................................................................................................................................................... At the start of the day Legislative Assembly Standing Order 16 provides that in the absence of Mr Speaker on a day when the House is sitting, the Clerk shall inform the House, and the Deputy-Speaker or the Chairman of Committees shall perform the duties of Mr Speaker. In the absence of both Mr Speaker, the Deputy-Speaker and the Chairman of Committees the House shall, before any business is conducted, proceed to the election of an Acting-Speaker. Note: When the Chairman performs the duties of Mr Speaker he is referred to as Mr Acting-Speaker. When at the start of a day one of the panel of Temporary Chairmen takes the chair he is referred to as Mr Acting- Speaker. Upon Mr Speaker's return, use this form. In the Legislative Council the Constitution Act requires the Chairman of Committees to exercise the functions of the President when the President is not in the State. -
House of Lords Official Report
Vol. 773 Wednesday No. 1 18 May 2016 PARLIAMENTARYDEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDEROFBUSINESS List of Government and Principal Officers of the House Queen’s Speech.......................................................................................................................1 Select Vestries Bill First Reading ......................................................................................................................4 Queen’s Speech Debate (1st Day) ...............................................................................................................4 Chairman of Committees ....................................................................................................25 Principal Deputy Chairman of Committees .......................................................................25 Lords wishing to be supplied with these Daily Reports should give notice to this effect to the Printed Paper Office. No proofs of Daily Reports are provided. Corrections for the bound volume which Lords wish to suggest to the report of their speeches should be clearly indicated in a copy of the Daily Report, which, with the column numbers concerned shown on the front cover, should be sent to the Editor of Debates, House of Lords, within 14 days of the date of the Daily Report. This issue of the Official Report is also available on the Internet at https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2016-05-18 The first time a Member speaks to a new piece of parliamentary business, the following abbreviations are used to show -
The Outlawries Bill Revised August 2010
Factsheet G21 House of Commons Information Office General Series The Outlawries Bill Revised August 2010 Contents The History of the Outlawries Bill 2 Challenging the Procedure 3 Contact information 4 Feedback form 5 This factsheet has been archived so the content and web links may be out of date. Please visit our About Parliament pages for current information. At the beginning of every new session of Parliament, the House of Commons is summoned to the Lords to hear the Speech from the Throne outlining government policy for the new session. When the Commons return to their own Chamber, they do not turn immediately to consideration of the Speech. Instead the Outlawries Bill is read a first time - a Bill which no Member presents, which has never been printed, and which is not intended to make any further progress. This Factsheet explains the significance and history of this Bill. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets August 2010 FS No.G21 Ed 3.3 Pr 1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2010 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 The Outlawries Bill House of Commons Information Office Factsheet G21 The History of the Outlawries Bill This apparently empty formality has an unbroken history of over four centuries and is of immense constitutional significance; the equivalent to the Outlawries Bill in the House of Lords is the Select Vestries Bill. The importance of this action is that it preserves and proclaims the right of the Commons to deliberate upon a subject of their own choosing, without necessarily turning first to the matters which may be mentioned in the royal summons.