Draft version October 12, 2008 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 03/07/07 THINGS: THE HI NEARBY GALAXY SURVEY Fabian Walter1, Elias Brinks2, W.J.G. de Blok3, Frank Bigiel1, Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr.4, Michele D. Thornley5 Adam K. Leroy1 Draft version October 12, 2008 ABSTRACT We present “The HI Nearby Galaxy Survey (THINGS)”, a high spectral (≤5.2kms−1) and spatial (∼ 6′′) resolution survey of HI emission in 34 nearby galaxies obtained using the NRAO Very Large Array (VLA). The overarching scientific goal of THINGS is to investigate fundamental characteristics of the interstellar medium (ISM) related to galaxy morphology, star formation and mass distribution across the Hubble sequence. Unique characteristics of the THINGS database are the homogeneous sensitivity as well as spatial and velocity resolution of the HI data which is at the limit of what can be achieved with the VLA for a significant number of galaxies. A sample of 34 objects at < < distances 2 ∼ D ∼ 15 Mpc (resulting in linear resolutions of ∼100 to 500pc) are targeted in THINGS, −3 −1 covering a wide range of star formation rates (∼ 10 to 6 M⊙ yr ), total HI masses MHI (0.01 to 9 14×10 M⊙), absolute luminosities MB (–11.5 to –21.7 mag) and metallicities (7.5 to 9.2 in units of 12+log[O/H]). We describe the setup of the VLA observations, the data reduction procedures and the creation of the final THINGS data products. We present an atlas of the integrated HI maps, the velocity fields, the second moment (velocity dispersion) maps and individual channel maps of each THINGS galaxy. The THINGS data products are made publicly available through a dedicated webpage. Accompanying THINGS papers address issues such as the small–scale structure of the ISM, the (dark) matter distribution in THINGS galaxies, and the processes leading to star formation. Subject headings: surveys — galaxies: structure — galaxies: ISM — ISM: general — ISM: atoms — radio lines: galaxies ′ 1. INTRODUCTION olutions of ∼ 10 ), naturally concentrated on performing For the past few decades studies of the atomic inter- detailed studies of the Galaxy and obtaining some global stellar medium (ISM), via observations of the 21–cm line measurements of other nearby systems. Only after radio of atomic hydrogen (HI), have proven to be fundamen- interferometers came into operation, did it become fea- tal for our understanding of the processes leading to star sible to obtain detailed, spatially resolved HI images of formation, the dynamics and structure of the ISM, and external galaxies. However, given the intrinsically low surface brightness of the HI emission, large collecting the (dark) matter distribution, thereby touching on ma- ′ jor issues related to galaxy evolution. Since the detection areas are needed, in particular if high–resolution (<1 ) of the HI line (whose forbidden hyperfine structure line imaging is desired. had been predicted by van de Hulst in 1945), this line has Ever since the first pioneering observations with large been used as the ‘workhorse’ for studies of the atomic gas interferometers in the late 1970’s, many galaxies have in our own and other galaxies. One of its benefits is that, been mapped with ever increasing resolution and sensi- in contrast to optical or UV radiation, HI emission does tivity (see, e.g., Bosma 1981a/b, Brinks & Bajaja 1986, not suffer from extinction by interstellar dust. In ad- Begeman 1987, Kamphuis et al. 1991, Puche et al. 1992, Braun et al. 1995, Staveley–Smith et al. 1997, Walter & arXiv:0810.2125v1 [astro-ph] 12 Oct 2008 dition, its Doppler shift provides information about the velocity of the emitting gas. This provides important Brinks 1999, Kim et al. 1999, de Blok & Walter 2000, information on the physical properties of the interstel- Verheijen & Sancisi 2001, Walter & Brinks 2001, Ott et lar gas and the associated kinematics of the ISM. Fur- al. 2001, Walter et al. 2002, Swaters et al. 2002). Al- thermore, 21 cm emission is (under most circumstances) though remarkable progress has been achieved in these optically thin; this means that the total amount of HI studies, the lack of high–resolution HI observations in a seen along a particular line of sight (HI column density) significant sample of nearby galaxies precludes a system- can be converted directly into an HI mass density and, atic study of the physical characteristics and dynamics integrated over an entire galaxy, a total HI mass. of the atomic ISM. Early studies, using single dish telecopes (yielding res- This paper describes ‘The HI Nearby Galaxy Survey’ (THINGS) which was obtained at the Very Large Array 6 1 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Astronomie, K¨onigstuhl 17, D-69117, of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory . The Heidelberg, Germany; [email protected] goal of THINGS was to obtain high quality observa- 2 Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, tions of the atomic ISM of a substantial sample of nearby Hatfield AL10 9AB, U.K. 3 Department of Astronomy, University of Cape Town, Ronde- galaxies, covering a wide range of Hubble types, star for- bosch 7700, South Africa mation rates, absolute luminosities, and metallicities to 4 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 6 The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of 5 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bucknell University, the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agree- Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA ment by Associated Universities, Inc. 2 Walter et al. address key science questions regarding the ISM in galax- clude a few key targets covered in Spitzer Space Telescope ies. A key characteristic of the THINGS database is the guaranteed time observations). Galaxies were chosen to homogeneous sensitivity, as well as spatial and velocity cover the full range of physical properties, from low– resolution that is at the limit of what can be achieved mass, metal–poor, quiescent dwarf galaxies to massive in studies of extragalactic HI with the VLA. Most of the spiral galaxies. The THINGS galaxies and their proper- galaxies in THINGS were drawn from the “Spitzer In- ties are listed in Table 1. Some of our sample galaxies frared Nearby Galaxies Survey (SINGS)” (Kennicutt et form part of the WHISP survey obtained at the West- al. 2003), a multi–wavelength project designed to study erbork radio telescope (e.g., Swaters et al. 2002) and we the properties of the dusty ISM in nearby galaxies, to en- have labeled these targets in Table 1. sure that multi–wavelength observations for each galaxy Early type (E/S0) galaxies were excluded from the are available for further analysis. THINGS target list as their ISM is dominated by hot Science capitalizing on the unique properties of the gas with little, if any, in a neutral atomic phase. Edge– THINGS data products will be presented in accompany- on systems (e.g., M82) were also excluded as the radial ing papers: de Blok et al. (2008) present a detailed anal- structure of the ISM cannot be disentangled from pro- ysis of high–resolution rotation curves and mass models jection effects in these systems. The sample was fur- (including new constraints for the stellar mass–to–light thermore limited to galaxies at distances D < 15Mpc ratio) for the majority of THINGS galaxies. Trachter- to ensure that structures smaller than 500pc can be re- nach et al. (2008) present a detailed analysis of the cen- solved (this is limited by the maximum HI resolution of tres of the THINGS targets and perform a harmonic de- 6′′ that can realistically be achieved at the VLA, as dis- composition of the velocity fields to constrain the non– cussed below). Local Group galaxies were also excluded circular motions in these objects. Oh et al. (2008) present because of their large size on the sky. The 34 galaxies a new method to remove these non–circular motions from in THINGS are listed in Table 1; the galaxy parameters the velocity fields to derive accurate rotation curves un- listed in this table are adopted for all THINGS papers affected by such motions. The star formation properties listed in the introduction, unless explicitly stated oth- are addressed in papers by Leroy et al. (2008) and Bigiel erwise. Throughout this paper, galaxies are sorted by et al. (2008). Leroy et al. test various star formation and Right Ascension (RA). threshold recipes that have been proposed to explain the observed star formation in galaxies. They also describe a 2.2. Spatial Resolution new method for creating star formation rate maps of in- The main scientific goals for THINGS require an angu- dividual galaxies. Bigiel et al. perform a pixel–by–pixel lar resolution of a few hundred parsecs in order to resolve comparison of the SFR and measured gas densities for neutral atomic gas complexes, to trace the fine structure a sample of THINGS galaxies to constrain the ‘star for- of the HI and to resolve spiral arms. This resolution mation law’ on small scales. Tamburro et al. (2008) use is also required to accurately derive the central shape the offset seen between the HI and 24 micron emission and slope of the rotation curve of a galaxy. Given the to derive an average timescale for star formation to com- distances to our sample galaxies, this necessitates an an- mence in spiral arm environments. The wealth of small– gular resolution of ∼6′′, which can be achieved using the scale structure in the ISM revealed in the THINGS data VLA in its B array configuration (baselines: 210 m to products is analyzed by Bagetakos et al. (in prep.) and 11.4 km). B array observations, however, are only sensi- Usero et al. (in prep.).