DOCSLIB.ORG

Join the Iranian-Syrian Axis? Why Do March 8 Parties Want Lebanon to : Ωϭοϭϣϟ΍Ϥ΍ϭϧϋ Join the Iranian-Syrian Axis? 27/08/2017 : Έηϧϟ΍Φϳέύη

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Join the Iranian-Syrian Axis? Why Do March 8 Parties Want Lebanon to : Ωϭοϭϣϟ΍Ϥ΍ϭϧϋ Join the Iranian-Syrian Axis? 27/08/2017 : Έηϧϟ΍Φϳέύη Why do March 8 parties want Lebanon to : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϡγ΍ join the Iranian-Syrian axis? Why do March 8 parties want Lebanon to : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϥ΍ϭϧϋ join the Iranian-Syrian axis? 27/08/2017 : έηϧϟ΍ΦϳέΎΗ ΔϣΩϘΗϣϟ΍ΕΎγ΍έΩϟ΍ϭΙΎΣΑϸϟϝΑϘΗγϣϟ΍ίϛέϣ : ΏΗΎϛϟ΍ϡγ΍ : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ March 8 parties ±particularly Hezbollah ±in support of the Iranian axis have sought rapprochement with Bashar al-Assad¶s regime and they are trying to push the Lebanese state to establish direct political and economic relations with it. March 14 parties, particularly the Lebanese Forces which opposes Syria, objected because Hezbollah¶s attempts aim to help the Syrian regime exit its regional and international isolation, to make it present again in Lebanon and enhance economic cooperation as a path to establish more comprehensive strategic relations. Any rapprochement with the al-Assad regime will deepen divisions in Lebanon and lead to a political crisis which may harm constitutional institutions and lead to tightening American sanctions on Hezbollah in order to harm the Lebanese economy or suspend foreign support for the Lebanese army. Involving Lebanon in the current regional disputes as a player in support of the Iranian axis may subject the country to Israeli aggression.After Minister of Industry Hussein Hajj Hassan (a representative of Hezbollah in the Lebanese government) said he and Minister of Agriculture Ghazi Zaiter (a representative of the Amal Movement in the government), received an invitation from the Syrian minister of Economy and Trade to participate in the International Damascus Exhibition which will be held from August 17 until August 26, some political parties in Lebanon sought rapprochement and cooperation with al-Assad regime to restore political ties. Hajj Hassan said: ³I will participate as minister of industry to hold talks. There are some points that need to be resolved on the level of trade and industry between the two countries. There are political and diplomatic relations between Lebanon and Syria. They have an envoy and we have an envoy.´Lebanese companies will participate in the Lebanese wing in the exhibition organized by the Ministry of Industry. If a minister attends this exhibition, it will be the first visit of its kind to Syria since the armed conflict erupted there in 2011.These statements sparked a wave of objections inside Lebanon, particularly by the March 14 parties which oppose the Iranian axis. Meanwhile this was met by an opposing wave that supports communicating with Syria.Opposing stances1. Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea confirmed (in a press conference held on August 10) that any Lebanese minister¶s official visit to Syria will shake political, security and military stability in Lebanon and will immediately place the country in the category of the Iranian axis thus leading to more sanctions and besieging the country even more.2. Future bloc Member of Parliament Ammar Houri told (the Voice of Lebanon radio station) that security coordination between Lebanon and Syria has been on for a while but political coordination has been specified by the ministerial statement and by the oath under the principle of dissociation. Houri added that reopening the subject means disturbing national consensus again which is a move that will further complicate matters and cause new divisions and tensions.3. Kataeb bloc MP Nadim Gemayel commented on the Lebanese ministers¶participation in the Damascus International Exhibition and said there is a regional strategic decision to normalize Lebanese relations with the Syrian-Iranian axis. He added that everything in the country works according to Hezbollah¶s pattern while the government covers up deals that leads to continuously pushing the state into a dark tunnel. 4. Democratic Gathering MP Antoine Saad emphasized (in an interview with Al- Fajr radio station on August 10) that the ministers¶visit to Syria violates the constitution and the country¶s sovereignty. He said the ministers must not visit in their capacity as ministers or cabinet representatives but must visit in their personal capacity as representing their businesses. He added that some have proposed this visit now because they are conspiring to throw Lebanon into the bosom of the Syrian regime.Supporting stances1. Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri said (during his Wednesday¶s meetings with MPs on August 9) that there are diplomatic relations and agreements between the two countries, adding that all phases proved that communication and cooperation are normal and serve both countries¶interests.2. Sports Minister Mohammad Fneish (Hezbollah¶s representative in the Lebanese government) said a single party does not have the right to make decisions on its own. He said it¶s not strange for a Lebanese minister to visit Syria considering there are diplomatic relations and agreements between the two countries; therefore, no one has the right to object.3. Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil (head of the Free Patriotic Movement) responded to those opposing to Hezbollah and Amal ministers¶Syria visit and stated that there are relations between Lebanon and Syria. He added that Lebanon appointed a Lebanese ambassador in Syria a while ago.Governing determinantsThe most important reasons March 8 parties called for communicating with Syria are:1. End the Syrian regime's regional isolation by promoting the idea that al-Assad regime still controls the situation in Syria and that it¶s the only legitimate power that must be dealt with ±like several countries in the region, primarily Iran and Iraq, are dealing with it. They¶re also promoting the idea that the demise of other parties in Syria calls for responding to calls to deal with al-Assad regime and that Lebanon will make the initiative to do so in the next phase especially that the two countries have a lot in common on the economic, political and security levels.2. Reproduce Syrian presence in Lebanon which many political powers, especially the Future Movement, are worried of. Lebanese Forces sources warned that the Syrian regime had negative presence in Lebanon during three essential phases ±during the Lebanese war, during its occupation of Lebanon and during its attempt to control the domestic scene via intervening and carrying out operations, such as the 9/26/2021 7:56:46 AM 1 / 2 explosions related to Michel Samaha and the explosions which targeted the mosques in Tripoli. This shows the Syrian regime¶s permanent desire to infiltrate Lebanon, and it also indicates that March 8 parties are paving way for this.3. Enhancing Lebanese- Syrian economic cooperation especially in the field of energy. What indicated this is the deal which Minister of Finance Ali Hassan Khalil recently signed with the Syrian government to supply Lebanon with electricity, 300 megawatts for 400 billon Lebanese Liras. Within this context, Syrian Minister of Electricity Mohammed Zuheir Kharboutli said ³Syria continues to supply the Lebanese state with electricity.´This pushes the Lebanese state to increase dependence on Syria which supports enhancing bilateral economic relations in the future in an attempt to develop them into more strategic relations.Expansive effectsCommunicating with al-Assad regime will have a series of repercussions that will affect the Lebanese state such as:1. Increasing domestic political disputes as a result of the policy of regional axes. This policy affects Lebanon where the political scene is divided between March 14 parties which oppose the Iranian-Syrian axis and March 8 parties which support this axis. The former rejects any cooperation with Iran or Syria while Hezbollah seeks to increase Syrian and Iranian presence in Lebanon. This has led to debates during the cabinet meeting held on August 9. The meeting confirmed the principle of dissociating Lebanon out of fear that disputes will erupt between ministers and paralyze the cabinet. The cabinet thus stated that if any minister wants to visit Syria then he must go in his personal capacity and not in his capacity as minister.2. Imposing sanctions and suspending military support to Lebanon. Many Lebanese sources believe that Lebanese ministers¶visit in their official capacity as minister to any official event organized by al- Assad regime reflects an official Lebanese recognition of the Syrian regime which is besieged by Arab and foreign countries. This may subject Lebanon to sanctions, including tightening American sanctions on Hezbollah in a way that targets banks and the Lebanese economy or suspends aid which western countries provide to Lebanon, especially American and European aid. This will harm the Lebanese state particularly in its war against terrorism.3. Listing Lebanon in the regional settlement. Attempts to involve Lebanon in the Syrian crisis tends to turn Lebanon into a card which Tehran, Damascus and Moscow can use against regional countries and the US, especially that Lebanon is a neighbor of Israel which is anticipating the growth of Hezbollah¶s power and influence in the region. This will increase resistance powers in the region thus further subjecting the Lebanese state to Israeli military hostilities. It will also increase economic pressures exerted by the international community, particularly American pressures. One must keep in mind that the Lebanese state¶s fragility and lack of independence makes Lebanon the first country to be sacrificed when a regional settlement is reached. 9/26/2021 7:56:46 AM 2 / 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lebanon: Managing the Gathering Storm
    LEBANON: MANAGING THE GATHERING STORM Middle East Report N°48 – 5 December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. A SYSTEM BETWEEN OLD AND NEW.................................................................. 1 A. SETTING THE STAGE: THE ELECTORAL CONTEST..................................................................1 B. THE MEHLIS EFFECT.............................................................................................................5 II. SECTARIANISM AND INTERNATIONALISATION ............................................. 8 A. FROM SYRIAN TUTELAGE TO WESTERN UMBRELLA?............................................................8 B. SHIFTING ALLIANCES..........................................................................................................12 III. THE HIZBOLLAH QUESTION ................................................................................ 16 A. “A NEW PHASE OF CONFRONTATION” ................................................................................17 B. HIZBOLLAH AS THE SHIITE GUARDIAN?..............................................................................19 C. THE PARTY OF GOD TURNS PARTY OF GOVERNMENT.........................................................20 IV. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 22 A. A BROAD INTERNATIONAL COALITION FOR A NARROW AGENDA .......................................22 B. A LEBANESE COURT ON FOREIGN
    [Show full text]
  • LEBANON: CONTAINING SPILLOVER from SYRIA Julien Barnes-Dacey
    BRIEF POLICY LEBANON: CONTAINING SPILLOVER FROM SYRIA Julien Barnes-Dacey Since independence in 1943, Lebanon has been one of the SUMMARY After more than a year of conflict in Syria, most fragile countries in the Middle East. Weakened by Lebanon is now also vulnerable. The Syrian civil centrifugal forces and external meddling, the central state war is amplifying Lebanese political divisions, has struggled to assert its hold over the country; repeated fuelling militancy and pushing Syrian President crises have provoked ongoing instability. But, with conflict Bashar al-Assad to stir up regional instability. worsening in neighbouring Syria, Lebanon now faces a However, the Lebanese are very aware of the risks new threat. Syria’s geographic proximity and longstanding they face and the country has strong resilience mechanisms in place. Key political actors – influence over Lebanon’s delicate political balance make particularly Hezbollah, Lebanon’s dominant it particularly sensitive to developments in its eastern force – are intent on preventing wider conflict. neighbour. With the intensification of the regional cold war Though tensions could yet push the country into between Iran and Saudi Arabia – both of which see Lebanon the abyss, particularly if Assad falls, Lebanon is as a battlefield of influence – the country risks being pulled more likely to experience a period of prolonged into the maelstrom. Isolated clashes associated with the but manageable instability with periodical conflict have already broken out across the country and violence rather than outright civil war. there are fears that the Syrian uprising could provoke a Europe should use the influence it has to support more significant descent into violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Samaha”
    Real consequences: reactions to the judgment of the Military Court in “Lebanon” toward “Michel Samaha” "Michel Samaha" received a prison sentence for four and a half years and stripped of the right to exercise civil rights by the Military Court in “Lebanon”, because of transferring explosives from Syria to Lebanon to carry out assassination operations against Syria figures and deputy and Lebanese clerics in northern Lebanon plans to implement it in the summer of 2012. “Samaha” is supposed to be out of prison after seven months by adding the duration he spent in pre-trial detention, and to be prevented from exercising the right to stand as candidates in the elections or participate in the vote. In addition, he was prevented from assuming any official position or Government in the future. “Samaha” was a former minister of “8 march”, and has a wide relations with Lebanese, regional and international politicians. He was close to the Syrian regime, and worked as media adviser for Bashar al-Assad. He was arrested on 9 August 2012, when he was caught red-handed with bombs, explosives and weapons. The Lebanese television stations aired one of videos recorded by a person called "Birth of Kfouri" who works for internal security forces, in which “Samaha” explained the indicated targets and the Syrian president former knowledge, but the military court did not face him with the videos. ********** Internal reactions: There were many reactions to the verdict against Michel Samaha, and could be noticed as follows: At the judicial level: the judge "Saqr Saqr” -commissioner of the Government to the permanent military court- requested for revocation of the Military Court sentence, as “Samaha” crime resulted in significant repercussions on Lebanese national security.
    [Show full text]
  • LEBANON RESTRICTIONS on BROADCASTING in Whose Interest?
    April 1997 Vol. 9, No. 1(E) LEBANON RESTRICTIONS ON BROADCASTING In Whose Interest? SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................................................2 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................6 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BROADCASTING LAW........................................................................................8 Restrictions on News, Political Programs, and Live Broadcasts....................................................................8 Operating Stations Denied Licenses; News and Political Programs Banned .................................................9 THE REACTION IN LEBANON ............................................................................................................................13 Capacity of the Airwaves Disputed..............................................................................................................15 Organizing Protests......................................................................................................................................16 Ban on Demonstrations Enforced ................................................................................................................17 INTERNATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transcript of the Hearing Held on 28 May 2015 in the Case Of
    20150528_STL-11-01_T_T155_OFF_PUB_EN 1/70 PUBLIC Official Transcript Procedural Matters (Open Session) Page 1 1 Special Tribunal for Lebanon 2 In the case of The Prosecutor v. Ayyash, Badreddine, Merhi, 3 Oneissi, and Sabra 4 STL-11-01 5 Presiding Judge David Re, Judge Janet Nosworthy, 6 Judge Micheline Braidy, Judge Walid Akoum, and 7 Judge Nicola Lettieri - [Trial Chamber] 8 Thursday, 28 May 2015 - [Trial Hearing] 9 [Open Session] 10 --- Upon commencing at 10.02 a.m. 11 THE REGISTRAR: The Special Tribunal for Lebanon is sitting in an 12 open session in the case of the Prosecutor versus Ayyash, Badreddine, 13 Merhi, Oneissi, and Sabra, case number STL-11-01. 14 PRESIDING JUDGE RE: Good morning to everyone. We will continue 15 with the evidence of Mr. Siniora in a moment. I'll just note the 16 appearances first. 17 We have Mr. Cameron for the Prosecution, Mr. Mattar for the Legal 18 Representatives of Victims. Good morning, Mr. Mattar. We have Mr. Aoun 19 for Mr. Ayyash, Mr. Korkmaz for Mr. Badreddine, Mr. Hassan for 20 Mr. Oneissi, Mr. Roberts for Mr. Sabra, Mr. Khalil for Mr. Merhi. And 21 there are two representatives of the Defence Office seated here. 22 Good morning to you, Mr. Siniora. 23 THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Good morning. 24 PRESIDING JUDGE RE: I just have an oral decision I must deliver. 25 So we will continue with the questioning in a moment. Thursday, 28 May 2015 STL-11-01 Interpretation serves to facilitate communication. Only the original speech is authentic. 20150528_STL-11-01_T_T155_OFF_PUB_EN 2/70 PUBLIC Official Transcript Ruling (Open Session) Page 2 1 This is a decision on protective measures for five witnesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon Interview Former Hezbollah Chief: ‘Tehran Is Only Investing in Lebanon’S Shia to Serve Its Own Interests’
    10 May 8, 2016 News & Analysis Lebanon Interview Former Hezbollah chief: ‘Tehran is only investing in Lebanon’s Shia to serve its own interests’ Mohamad Kawas Hezbollah chief confirmed that the group is using various social, cul- tural and economic pressures, seek- Beirut ing to ensure that Lebanon’s Shias remain in their corner, however re- ubhi al-Tufayli served as the luctantly. first secretary-general of He warned that Hezbollah’s do- Hezbollah from 1989-91, al- mestic and regional opponents were though the group was very playing into the group’s hands by different then compared to acting as if it were truly the sole rep- Snow under Sayyed Hassan Nasral- resentative of Lebanon’s Shias, fail- lah. Since leaving the group in 1992, ing to pay attention or provide sup- Tufayli has become an increasingly port to voices of dissent within the vocal critic of it, particularly over its Shia community. perceived subordination to Tehran. Tufayli said he was referring in The Arab Weekly met with Tu- particular to the Resistance and fayli at his home in Ain Bourday, Development Bloc, an electoral al- a small village in the Bekaa valley liance between Hezbollah and Amal not far from Baalbek. For Tufayli, Movement during Lebanon’s 2005 who says he remains committed to elections. Other Shia political par- the interests of Lebanon’s Shias, it ties or politicians who objected to is not a question of his leaving the the new Shia political makeup were group but rather of Hezbollah leav- ignored, he said. ing him behind.
    [Show full text]
  • Hezbollah Expands Presence in Syria
    10 April 17, 2016 News & Analysis Lebanon Hezbollah expands presence in Syria James Bruce army with a sophisticated com- mand-and-control structure, an advanced telecommunications Beirut network, tanks, artillery and other heavy weapons able to wage a war ne of the big winners in of manoeuvre in conjunction with the Syrian war is Hez- other forces. This critical develop- bollah, the Lebanese ment has not been lost on Israel. Shia movement that has Stratfor postulated that “Hezbol- long been Iran’s most lah’s attempts to expand and so- Ovalued proxy in the Sunni-dom- lidify its control” in western Syria inated region. There are growing along Lebanon’s largely mountain- signs that the Party of God is pre- ous north-eastern border “will paring to expand its zone of influ- only increase in the future… The ence into Syria itself and, backed base near Qusayr, like other antici- by its growing military power, as- pated positions in Syria, is part of sert its domination of Lebanon. Hezbollah’s future strategy in the “Like other foreign and domes- country.” tic actors, Hezbollah has seized Satellite imagery indicates the on the Syrian civil war to improve Qusayr base will be extensive and its position in the country and the heavily defended. All this indicates surrounding region,” the US-based a permanency that underscores global intelligence consultancy Hezbollah’s efforts to hold ground Stratfor said in an April 6th analy- inside Syria and create a buffer sis. zone to prevent jihadist forces The party, established in 1982 as from encroaching into Lebanon, the first of Iran’s Shia proxy groups now a Hezbollah-dominated out- and now its most powerful ally, is post for Iran in the gas-rich eastern setting up military bases in Syria Mediterranean and poses a direct after playing a leading role in en- threat to neighbouring Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Syria Spills Over: Sectarian Conflict in Lebanon
    Insight Syria Spills Over: Sectarian Conflict in Lebanon JANUARY 24, 2013 Co-Authored by Yelena Altman Due to the complicated relationship between the two countries, Syria’s protracted crisis was bound to spill over into neighboring Lebanon. Sectarian tensions, heightened by refugees, kidnappings, combatants, and terrorist plots, threaten the peace in fragile Lebanon – and the longer the war lasts, the more danger exists. Yet if Lebanon can get through this period without exploding into sectarian warfare, it might finally succeed in shaking off Syria’s corrosive influence. U.S. policy should support non-sectarian elements in Lebanon, while presenting evidence to the world of Hezbollah’s shameful abetting of Assad. Lebanon was carved out of Greater Syria after the First World War as a Western-oriented territory dominated by Maronite Christians. Syria was reluctant to recognize Lebanon’s independence, refusing even to appoint an ambassador until 2008. Two legacies of Lebanon’s 1975-1990 civil war helped Syria gain undue leverage in Lebanon. First, Syria sent troops to Lebanon during the war, ostensibly to keep the peace. Yet Syria essentially continued to occupy Lebanon a full fifteen years after the war ended, only departing in 2005 after being implicated in the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. Syrian intelligence agents still operate in Lebanon. A second civil war legacy was the formation of Hezbollah as a Shia resistance front against Israeli troops, who also had invaded Lebanon to fight Palestinian militants and oppose the Syrians. Despite Israel’s complete withdrawal in 2000, Hezbollah remains a major force in Lebanon and is responsible for terrorist attacks around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Hezbollah Involvement in Syria Fans Flames of Sectarian War by Andrew J
    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds Hezbollah Involvement in Syria Fans Flames of Sectarian War by Andrew J. Tabler Apr 1, 2014 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Andrew J. Tabler Andrew J. Tabler is the Martin J. Gross fellow in the Geduld Program on Arab Politics at The Washington Institute, where he focuses on Syria and U.S. policy in the Levant. Articles & Testimony The Party of God is not only hurting its domestic standing in Lebanon, but also inviting a wider regional conflict it cannot control. eports of heavy Hezbollah casualties trickling out of Syria's Qalamoun area are but the latest sign that the R Party of God's involvement in Syria will continue to cost it dearly. But the real price for Hezbollah is being paid in Lebanon, where Hezbollah's support for the Assad regime has led to increased suicide car bombings, Sunni-Shiite tension, and armed clashes, not to mention recent concessions to the March 14 alliance in forming a caretaker Lebanese government. While spillover into Lebanon may seem a local issue, my interviews with Lebanese and Syrians during a recent visit to Lebanon indicate that such incidents, combined with a possible security vacuum caused by government bickering over the selection of Lebanon's next president, could fan the flames into a wider regional conflict that Hezbollah and Iran cannot put out and cannot afford. What is more, retaliating against Western targets is not the easy distraction it used to be and will only make things worse, not better, for the Iranian alliance. In intervening in Syria to save the Assad regime, Hezbollah has made Lebanon a battleground for Syrians and Gulf- supported Salafist-jihadist groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Al Jazeera and Agencies Lebanon Minister Quits Over 'Hezbollah
    Al Jazeera And Agencies Lebanon minister quits over 'Hezbollah domination' Accusing Shia group of trying to "extend control over state and its decisions", Ashraf Rifi resigns as justice minister. 21 Feb 2016 23:18 GMT | Rifi said Hezbollah has used the current government to consolidate what he said was a mini-state [Mohamed Azakir/Reuters] Lebanon's justice minister says he is resigning over what he calls Hezbollah's "domination" of the country's government. Ashraf Rifi's announcement on Sunday came two days after Saudi Arabia announced it was suspending $3bn in aid to Lebanon's army in protest against "hostile" positions it said were inspired by Hezbollah. "There is an armed party that is dominating the government's decision," Rifi, a fierce opponent of Hezbollah, said in a statement, referring to the Shia group, which is represented in Lebanon's parliament but also maintains a powerful military wing. "Hezbollah has used this government to consolidate its project of a mini-state. It wanted to use it as a tool to extend its control over the state and its decisions," AFP news agency reported Rifi as saying. "I will not accept becoming false witness and covering for those trying to dominate the state and its institutions ... that is why I am presenting my resignation." Without president Hezbollah's media channel Al Manar reported that Judge Alisse Shebtini was assigned the post of acting justice minister. Rifi accused Hezbollah of being responsible for the political crisis in Lebanon that has left the country without a president for the past 21 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon: Background and U.S. Policy
    Lebanon: Background and U.S. Policy Christopher M. Blanchard Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs February 14, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42816 Lebanon: Background and U.S. Policy Summary Lebanon’s small geographic size and population belie the important role it has long played in the security, stability, and economy of the Levant and the broader Middle East. Congress and the executive branch have recognized Lebanon’s status as a venue for regional strategic competition and have engaged diplomatically, financially, and at times, militarily to influence events there. For most of its independent existence, Lebanon has been torn by periodic civil conflict and political battles between rival religious sects and ideological groups. External military intervention, occupation, and interference have exacerbated Lebanon’s political struggles in recent decades. Lebanon is an important factor in U.S. calculations regarding regional security, particularly regarding Israel and Iran. Congressional concerns have focused on the prominent role that Hezbollah, an Iran-backed Shiite militia, political party, and U.S.-designated terrorist organization, continues to play in Lebanon and beyond, including its recent armed intervention in Syria. Congress has appropriated more than $1 billion since the end of the brief Israel-Hezbollah war of 2006 to support U.S. policies designed to extend Lebanese security forces’ control over the country and promote economic growth. The civil war in neighboring Syria is progressively destabilizing Lebanon. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, nearly one million predominantly Sunni Syrian refugees have fled to Lebanon, equivalent to close to one quarter of Lebanon’s population.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers on Lebanon the Effects of Arab Spring and Syrian Uprising On
    Papers on Lebanon The Effects of Arab Spring and Syrian Uprising on Lebanon Daniel Meier – Centre for Lebanese Studies Visiting Fellow – St. Anthony’s College, University of Oxford May 2013 1 This paper seeks to analyse the multiple dimensions of the effects of the Arab Spring and Syrian uprising on Lebanon since its inception in 2010. For obvious reasons, the main body of this work will be dedicated to the effects of the Syrian turmoil on the Lebanese scene. The main arguments hereafter will try to show two main effects on Lebanon. Firstly, I will highlight the spill over effect the Arab Spring had on certain groups of the Lebanese civil society and how these actors mobilized a population to address a claim for the abolition of the sectarian system. Secondly, I will underline the polarization effect the Syrian conflict creates in the political scene in Lebanon due mainly to Lebanese actors who use some of its main dimensions (e.g., political, sectarian) for their own purposes. In order to develop these arguments, I will divide the presentation in three sections; the first section will demonstrate the initial impacts on the Lebanese society and also delve in the first political reactions about the Arab Spring and its spreading in Syria since March 2011. The second section will explore the direct impacts on the ground of the latest crisis, focusing on security issues and refugee questions, describing the State positioning, to underline the representations of the potential danger that are threatening Lebanon. The third section will illustrate the process of sectarian division that deepened among the Lebanese Muslims sects, mainly Sunnis and Shiites, and highlight the strategies followed by the antagonistic political coalitions of 8th and 14th March, mainly their two leading political formations Hizbullah and Al-Mustaqbal.
    [Show full text]