DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendices to Vol 4B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendices to Vol 4B Vote 86 Tanga Region Councils in the Region Council District Councils Code 2018 Tanga City Council 2025 Korogwe Town Council 2038 Handeni Town Council 3069 Muheza District Council 3070 Pangani District Council 3071 Korogwe District Council 3072 Handeni District Council 3073 Lushoto District Council 3093 Kilindi District Council 3106 Mkinga District Council 3141 Bumbuli District Council 2 Vote 86 Tanga Region Council Development Budget Summary Local and Foreign 2014/15 Code Council Local Foreign Total 2018 Tanga City Council 6,284,528,000 4,055,726,000 10,340,254,000 2025 Korogwe Town Council 835,355,000 2,133,500,000 2,968,855,000 2038 Handeni Town Council 0 0 0 3069 Muheza District Council 1,724,971,000 2,109,900,000 3,834,871,000 3070 Pangani District Council 1,437,699,000 1,452,376,000 2,890,075,000 3071 Korogwe District Council 2,037,310,000 1,855,108,000 3,892,418,000 3072 Handeni District Council 2,584,232,000 2,273,114,000 4,857,346,000 3073 Lushoto District Council 3,092,479,000 2,451,378,000 5,543,857,000 3093 Kilindi District Council 3,223,981,000 1,940,690,000 5,164,671,000 3106 Mkinga District Council 1,878,651,000 1,255,017,000 3,133,668,000 3141 Bumbuli District Council 2,547,702,000 1,120,279,000 3,667,981,000 Total 25,646,908,000 20,647,088,000 46,293,996,000 3 Vote 86 Tanga Region Code Description 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Actual Expenditure Approved Expenditure Estimates Local Foreign Local Foreign Local Foreign Total Shs. Shs. Shs. 86 Tanga Region 3280 Rural Water Supply & Sanitation 1,111,549,000 0 0 5,455,968,000 0 5,031,986,000 5,031,986,000 4170 Road Fund 5,546,704,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 4390 Secondary Education Development 0 0 0 2,023,640,000 0 3,640,200,000 3,640,200,000 Programme 4399 Local Government Resources Centre Project 0 2,922,037,000 0 0 0 0 0 4404 District Agriculture Development Support 0 0 0 0 0 1,272,750,000 1,272,750,000 4486 Agriculture Sector Dev. Prog. Support 0 0 0 1,812,250,000 0 826,500,000 826,500,000 4628 Participatory Forest Management 0 0 0 441,028,000 0 0 0 4946 LGA's Own Sources Project 0 0 0 0 10,638,863,000 0 10,638,863,000 5421 Health Sector Prog. Support-Districts 0 0 0 4,438,919,000 0 3,242,179,000 3,242,179,000 5486 Health Sector Programme Support 0 0 0 0 0 636,860,000 636,860,000 5492 Tanzania Multisectoral HIV/AIDS Project 0 0 0 0 0 317,716,000 317,716,000 5493 Global Fund HIV/AIDS Prev. Project 0 0 0 325,616,000 0 0 0 5499 HIV/AIDS 0 325,616,000 0 802,636,000 0 94,712,000 94,712,000 6240 Support to District Councils 0 0 4,070,000,000 1,948,358,000 0 0 0 6277 Local Govt Support Programme 0 0 9,563,494,700 0 9,323,382,000 1,888,819,000 11,212,201,000 6385 Construction of Council's Headquarters 0 0 0 0 2,500,000,000 0 2,500,000,000 6401 District Councils 2,350,000,000 0 0 0 2,556,876,000 0 2,556,876,000 6402 Town/Munucipal/City Councils 0 0 0 0 627,787,000 0 627,787,000 6403 Tanzania Strategic Cities Proj 0 495,100,000 0 3,777,006,000 0 2,759,300,000 2,759,300,000 6405 Urban Local Government Strengthening Prog 0 0 0 192,816,000 0 936,066,000 936,066,000 Vote Total 9,008,253,000 3,742,753,000 13,633,494,700 21,218,237,000 25,646,908,000 20,647,088,000 46,293,996,000 4 Vote 86 Tanga Region A. ESTIMATE of the amount required in the year ending 30th June 2015, for the councils in the Tanga Region Forty Six Billion Two Hundred and Ninety Three Million Nine Hundred and Ninety Six Thousand (Shs. 46,293,996,000) B. Projects under which this Vote will be accounted for by the REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY, Tanga Region, are set out in the details below. Vote 86 Tanga Region Code Description 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Actual Approved Estimates Expenditure Expenditure Local Foreign Local Foreign Local Foreign Donor Total Shs. Shs. Shs. Council 2018 Tanga City Council Project 0000 Undefined project 5005 Trade and Economy 0 0 1,916,355,500 110,000,000 0 0 Own Sources 0 Total of Project 0 0 1,916,355,500 110,000,000 0 0 0 Project 3280 Rural Water Supply & Sanitation 5018 Urban Water Supply 0 0 0 206,914,000 106,619,000 ADF 106,619,000 Total of Project 0 0 0 206,914,000 106,619,000 106,619,000 Project 4390 Secondary Education Development Programme 5008 Secondary Education 0 0 0 237,994,000 0 373,532,000 WORLD BANK 373,532,000 Total of Project 0 0 0 237,994,000 0 373,532,000 373,532,000 Project 4404 District Agriculture Development Support 5033 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 75,000,000 BASKET 75,000,000 Total of Project 0 0 0 0 0 75,000,000 75,000,000 Project 4457 Rural Financial Services Programmes 5 Vote 86 Tanga Region Code Description 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Actual Approved Estimates Expenditure Expenditure Local Foreign Local Foreign Local Foreign Donor Total Shs. Shs. Shs. 5033 Agriculture 0 0 0 75,000,000 0 0 Agriculture 0 Sectoral Programme Funding Total of Project 0 0 0 75,000,000 0 0 0 Project 4946 LGA's Own Sources Project 5004 Administration and General 0 0 0 0 4,653,239,000 0 GoT 4,653,239,000 Total of Project 0 0 0 0 4,653,239,000 0 4,653,239,000 Project 5421 Health Sector Prog. Support-Districts 5012 Health Centres 0 0 80,537,000 0 0 300,000,000 BASKET 300,000,000 5013 Dispensaries 0 0 53,000,000 0 0 184,433,000 BASKET 184,433,000 Total of Project 0 0 133,537,000 0 0 484,433,000 484,433,000 Project 5492 Tanzania Multisectoral HIV/AIDS Project 5027 Community Development, Gender 0 0 0 101,798,000 0 47,762,000 WORLD BANK 47,762,000 & Children Total of Project 0 0 0 101,798,000 0 47,762,000 47,762,000 Project 6277 Local Govt Support Programme 5004 Administration and General 0 0 0 38,403,000 0 32,527,000 BASKET 32,527,000 5005 Trade and Economy 0 0 1,228,305,800 215,563,000 0 176,553,000 BASKET 176,553,000 5010 Health Services 0 0 256,070,700 0 0 0 LGCDG - 0 Capital Development 5012 Health Centres 0 0 302,354,000 0 0 0 LGCDG - 0 Capital Development 6 Vote 86 Tanga Region Code Description 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Actual Approved Estimates Expenditure Expenditure Local Foreign Local Foreign Local Foreign Donor Total Shs. Shs. Shs. 5013 Dispensaries 0 0 137,800,000 0 0 0 LGCDG - 0 Capital Development 5014 Works 0 0 0 0 1,029,260,000 0 GoT 1,029,260,000 Total of Project 0 0 1,924,530,500 253,966,000 1,029,260,000 209,080,000 1,238,340,000 Project 6290 Strategic Urban Planning 5014 Works 0 0 0 3,777,006,000 0 0 WORLD BANK 0 Total of Project 0 0 0 3,777,006,000 0 0 0 Project 6402 Town/Munucipal/City Councils 5000 Administration and General 0 0 0 0 52,029,000 0 GoT 52,029,000 5005 Trade and Economy 0 0 0 0 550,000,000 0 GoT 550,000,000 Total of Project 0 0 0 0 602,029,000 0 602,029,000 Project 6403 Tanzania Strategic Cities Proj 5014 Works 0 0 0 0 0 2,759,300,000 WORLD BANK 2,759,300,000 Total of Project 0 0 0 0 0 2,759,300,000 2,759,300,000 Total of Tanga City Council 0 0 3,974,423,000 4,762,678,000 6,284,528,000 4,055,726,000 10,340,254,000 Council 2025 Korogwe Town Council Project 3280 Rural Water Supply & Sanitation 5017 Rural Water Supply 0 0 0 337,428,000 0 109,726,000 ADF 109,726,000 Total of Project 0 0 0 337,428,000 0 109,726,000 109,726,000 Project 4390 Secondary Education Development Programme 5008 Secondary Education 0 0 0 177,169,000 0 261,704,000 WORLD BANK 261,704,000 7 Vote 86 Tanga Region Code Description 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Actual Approved Estimates Expenditure Expenditure Local Foreign Local Foreign Local Foreign Donor Total Shs. Shs. Shs. Total of Project 0 0 0 177,169,000 0 261,704,000 261,704,000 Project 4404 District Agriculture Development Support 5033 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 287,000,000 BASKET 287,000,000 Total of Project 0 0 0 0 0 287,000,000 287,000,000 Project 4486 Agriculture Sector Dev. Prog.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland
    The United Republic of Tanzania June, 2018 The United Republic of Tanzania National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland The National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017) was compiled by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) in collaboration with National Technical Working Group on Environment Statistics. The compilation work of this report took place between December, 2016 to March, 2018. Funding for compilation and report writing was provided by the Government of Tanzania and the World Bank (WB) through the Tanzania Statistical Master Plan (TSMP) Basket Fund. Technical support was provided by the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) and the East African Community (EAC) Secretariat. Additional information about this report may be obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics through the following address: Director General, 18 Kivukoni Road, P.O.Box 796, 11992 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Telephone: 255-22-212-2724; email: [email protected]; website: www.nbs.go.tz). Recommended citation: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania] 2017. National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Mainland. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Maps ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNITED REPUBLIC of TANZANIA Comprehensive Food
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Comprehensive Food Security and Nutrition Assessment Report Coordinated by the Disaster Management Department - Prime Minister’s Office and The National Food Security Division - Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries Dar es Salaam Prepared by the Tanzania Food Security and Nutrition Analysis System - MUCHALI Tanzania FEBRUARY 2017 The Mfumo wa Uchambuzi wa Uhakika wa Chakula na Lishe (MUCHALI) Partners ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... v LIST OF ANNEX ......................................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF ACRONMYS ........................................................................................................................... viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ ix CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Overview of the National
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Wuchereria Bancrofti Infection in Mosquitoes from Pangani District, Northeastern Tanzania Godlisten S
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Prevalence of Wuchereria bancrofti Infection in Mosquitoes from Pangani District, Northeastern Tanzania Godlisten S. Materua aNational Institute for Medical Research, Tukuyu Research Centre, Mbeya, Tanzania Correspondence to Godlisten S. Materu ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Background: Wuchereria bancrofti is the most widely distributed of the 3 nematodes known to cause lymphatic filariasis, the other 2 being Brugia malayi and Brugia timori. Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus are the main vectors. However, the relative contributions of mosquito vectors to disease burden and infectivity are becoming increasingly important in coastal East Africa, and this is particularly true in the urban and semiurban areas of Pangani District, Tanzania. Methods: Mosquitoes were sampled from 5 randomly selected villages of Pangani District, namely, Bweni, Madanga, Meka, Msaraza, and Pangani West. Sampling of mosquitoes was done using standard Centers for Disease Control light traps with incandescent light bulbs. The presence of W. bancrofti in mosquitoes was determined via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays using NV1 and NV2 primers, and PoolScreen 2 software was used to determine the estimated rate of W. bancrofti infection in mosquitoes. Results: A total of 951 mosquitoes were collected, of which 99.36% were Culex quinquefasciatus, 0.32% were Anopheles gambiae, and 0.32% other Culex species. The estimated rate of W. bancrofti infection among these mosquitoes was 3.3%. Conclusion: This was the first study employing the use of PoolScreen PCR to detectW. bancrofti circulating in mosquito vectors in Pangani District, northeastern Tanzania. The presence of W. bancrofti infection suggests the possibility of infected humans in the area. The high abundance of Cx.
    [Show full text]
  • 3069 Muheza District Council 5003 Internal Audit 5004 Admin and HRM 5005 Trade and Economy 5006 Administration and Adult Education 5007 Primary Education
    Council Subvote Index 86 Tanga Region Subvote Description Council District Councils Number Code 2018 Tanga City Council 5003 Internal Audit 5004 Admin and HRM 5005 Trade and Economy 5006 Administration and Adult Education 5007 Primary Education 5008 Secondary Education 5009 Land Development & Urban Planning 5010 Health Services 5011 Preventive Services 5012 Health Centres 5013 Dispensaries 5014 Works 5018 Urban Water Supply 5022 Natural Resources 5027 Community Development, Gender & Children 5031 Salaries for VEOs 5032 Salaries for MEOs 5033 Agriculture 5034 Livestock 5036 Environments 2025 Korogwe Town Council 5003 Internal Audit 5004 Admin and HRM 5005 Trade and Economy 5006 Administration and Adult Education 5007 Primary Education 5008 Secondary Education 5009 Land Development & Urban Planning 5010 Health Services 5011 Preventive Services 5012 Health Centres 5013 Dispensaries 5014 Works 5018 Urban Water Supply 5022 Natural Resources 5027 Community Development, Gender & Children 5031 Salaries for VEOs 5032 Salaries for MEOs 5033 Agriculture 5034 Livestock 5036 Environments 3069 Muheza District Council 5003 Internal Audit 5004 Admin and HRM 5005 Trade and Economy 5006 Administration and Adult Education 5007 Primary Education ii Council Subvote Index 86 Tanga Region Subvote Description Council District Councils Number Code 3069 Muheza District Council 5008 Secondary Education 5009 Land Development & Urban Planning 5010 Health Services 5011 Preventive Services 5012 Health Centres 5013 Dispensaries 5014 Works 5017 Rural Water Supply 5022
    [Show full text]
  • Pangani Basin: a Situation Analysis
    Pangani Basin: A Situation Analysis IUCN Eastern Africa Programme 2003 i Published by: Copyright: © 2003 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources This publication may be produced in whole or part and in any form for education or non-profit uses, without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. IUCN would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication which uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purpose without the prior written permission of IUCN. Citation: IUCN Eastern Africa Programme, 2003. The Pangani River Basin: A Situation Analysis, xvi + 104pp. ISBN: 2-8317-0760-9 Design and layout: Gordon O. Arara Printed by: ScanHouse Press Ltd. Photo 1: The summit of Mount Kilimanjaro; Photo 2: Forest stand at 1 Shire Njoro; Photo 3: Gate controlling the release of water into irrigation furrows; Photo 4: Children swimming in an irrigation 3 4 reservoir; Photo 5: Sisal plantations; Photo 6: Irrigated rice scheme; 2 Photo 7: Water gauging station at Chemka Spring; Photo 8: Vandalized gate controlling the release of water into irrigation furrows; Photo 9: 5 Dam wall at Nyumba ya Mungu Reservoir (color changes mark the declining water levels); Photo 10: A vendor sells water from a borehole 6 9 10 Photos 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 copyright 2003 Kelly West; Photos 2, 7 7 8 copyright 2002 Kim Geheb; Photos 4, 10 copyright 2003 Ger Bergkamp. Available from: IUCN- EARO Publications Service Unit, P. O. Box 68200 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya; Telephone ++ 254 20 890605-12; Fax ++ 254 20 890615; E-mail: [email protected] The designations of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the participating organiza- tions concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or con- cerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Rural Poverty in Tanzania: Evidence from Mkinga District, Tanga Region
    Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) Vol.5, No.6, 2015 Determinants of Rural Poverty in Tanzania: Evidence from Mkinga District, Tanga Region Hanifa Mohamed Yusuf 1 Phillip D. Daninga 2,3* Li Xiaoyun 1 1.College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University. No.17 Qing Hua Dong Lu, Haidian District, Beijing 100083 P.R.China 2.Department of Economic Studies, The Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy, P.O. Box 9193 Dar es salaam, Tanzania 3.Information Analysis and Evaluation Division, Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science No.12 South Zhongguancun St. Beijing 100081, China * E-mail of the corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Identification of factors that are strongly linked to poverty is an important aspect in developing successful strategies intended for poverty reduction. This study aimed at assessing the determinants of poverty in Mkinga district in rural Tanzania. Ordinal regression model was used to model events of observing scores of livelihood status in the area of study. The study revealed that nearly 93% of respondents in the area were poor. Gender, size of land the household owns, the size of farm used in farming, Household size and the dependency ratio were found to be related to poverty, hence influencing poverty in the area of study. While the government is responsible in providing proper infrastructural settings, this paper recommends that, people especially women in this area should be empowered to have positive attitudes towards participating into economic activities using resources around them. Keywords: Rural poverty, Economic growth, Poverty determinants, and Mkinga district 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanga Coastal Zone Conservation and Development Programme
    Tanga Coastal Zone Conservation and Development Programme End of Phase III Evaluation EARO/75969/801 I PREFACE “Behold! In the creation of the heavens and the earth; in the alteration of the Night and the Day; in the sailing of the ships through the Ocean for the profit of mankind; in the rain which He sends down from the skies, and the life which He gives therewith to an earth that is dead; in the beasts of all kinds that He scatters though the earth, in the change of the winds, and the clouds which they trail like their slaves between the sky and the earth; - here indeed are signs for a people who are wise”. Sura 2 aya 164 II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Evaluators would like to thank all those involved in the Evaluation Process and listed in Appendix 1. The Evaluation Team also appreciates the comments received on the draft of this report from the Districts, the SU, IUCN and Ireland Aid. Thanks are due to Dr Eric Verheij, Technical Advisor, Mr Solomon Makoloweka Regional Coastal Management Facilitator and the Staff of the support Unit for their support of the evaluation process. We should also like to make note of those Community members who made time to participate in the Village level meetings. Apologies are also due to Communities that were kept waiting due to over runs in the schedule for earlier meetings. Finally thanks are due to Government at National, Regional and District level particularly to DEDs, DNROs and DCs from Pangani and Muheza Districts and Tanga Municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Th August, 2019 at 11.00Am, Tanga District Forest Manager’S Office at Chumbageni in Tanga City
    THE SALE OF STANDING TEAK TREES BY AUCTION AT MUHEZA DISTRICT AND NILO NATURE RESERVE AT KOROGWE DISTRICT, TANGA. 1. Tanzania Forest Services Agency (TFS) intends to sale teak trees with a total volume of 1,600.883 cubic meters grown along forest reserves boundaries of Muheza District and at NILO Nature reserve in Korogwe District in Tanga Region. The standing teak trees will be sold through Auction on 13th August, 2019 at 11.00Am, Tanga district forest manager’s office at Chumbageni in Tanga City. The sales will be carried out in accordance with the auctions procedures as stated under regulation 31(ii) in the Forest Regulation of 2004. The standing teak trees are sold as on “as is where is” basis and the selling entity shall have no further liability after the sales. 2. Interested firms/Individuals must submit his/her wishes and other information in a sealed envelope indicating name of the forest reserve and volume, price per cubic meter he/she is able and willing to pay or offer as shown in table 1 below. Also, interested party has to submit copies of registration for sawmill trade of forest products, business license and the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). 3. After submitting the request, the wishing buyer will be required to participate in the auction. The buyer, who will offer the highest price per meter cubic, will be required to make payments as stipulated in paragraph 9 of this Advert. After the payments, the buyer will sign a selling contract with TFS to grant a buyer a permit to harvest the standing teak trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Tanzania
    AFB/PPRC.5/15 June 3, 2011 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee Fifth Meeting Bonn, June 20, 2011 PROPOSAL FOR TANZANIA I. Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund, adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board, state in paragraph 41 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the approval by the Board. In the second step, the fully-developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would finally require Board‟s approval. 2. The Templates Approved by the Adaptation Fund Board (Operational Policies and Guidelines for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund, Annex 3) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • KOROGWE DC CWIQ Survey on Poverty, Welfare and Services in Korogwe DC
    PMO-RALG KOROGWE DC CWIQ Survey on Poverty, Welfare and Services in Korogwe DC APRIL 2007 Implemented by: EDI (Economic Development Initiatives) PO Box 393, Bukoba Tanzania Telephone and Fax: +255-(0)28-2220059 Email: [email protected] www.edi-africa.com II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was commissioned by the Prime Minister’s Office – Regional Administration and Local Governance (PMO-RALG) and implemented by EDI (Economic Development Initiatives). It is part of an effort to conduct CWIQ surveys in 34 districts across Tanzania. The project Director is Joachim De Weerdt. Field work operations are being co-coordinated by Respichius Mitti and Francis Moyo. Field supervision was in the hands of Matovu Davies, Wilson Kabito, Henry Kilapilo, Henry Lugakingira, Josephine Lugomora, George Musikula, and Neema Mwampeta. The listing team was formed by Felix Kapinga and Benjamin Kamukulu. Interviewers were Dativa Balige, Geofrey Bakari, Rukia Charles, Abbanova Gabba, George Gabriel, Jamary Idrissa, Felix James, Batista John, Gloria Joseph, Placidia Josephat, Justina Katoke, Makarius Kiyonga, Sampson Mutalemwa, Faustine Misinde, Jessica Nkonjerwa, Kamugisha Robert, Resti Simon, Pius Sosthenes, Aissa Soud, Adella Theobald, and Honoratha Wycliffe. The data processing software was written by Jim Otto and Neil Chalmers. The data entry team consisted of Mary Stella Andrew and Alieth Mutungi, and was supervised by Thaddeus Rweyemamu. Formatting the final document layout was in the hands of Amina Suedi. The data analysis and report writing were undertaken by Anitha Philbert and Manuel Barron. Assistance from Charles Citinka and Howard Clegg from PMO-RALG is acknowledged. III DEFINITIONS General Accessible Cluster Within a district, accessible clusters are villages located closer to the district capital, all-weather roads, and public transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Five Years of CEPF Investment in the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya
    Assessing Five Years of CEPF Investment in the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya A Special Report June 2009 1 CONTENTS Overview …………………………………………………………………………………. …………… 3 CEPF Five-Year Logical Framework Reporting……………………………………………………….. 24 Appendices …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 32 2 OVERVIEW Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) investment in the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya commenced in June 2003 with the approval of an ecosystem profile developed with stakeholders and a grant allocation of $7 million to be awarded over five years. The Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests shelter one of the greatest densities of plant and vertebrate species found nowhere else, or endemic, in the world. Juxtaposed with a high degree of forest fragmentation and threats, this area is considered among the areas most likely to witness the extinction of species in the near future. The Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests comprise part of the larger Eastern Afromontane and Coastal Forests of Eastern Africa biodiversity hotspots, respectively. At the time the ecosystem profile was prepared, the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests region was classified as a biodiversity hotspot itself. However, a reappraisal of the hotspots released in 2005 divided this region and placed it within the two newly identified hotspots mentioned above. The profile and CEPF investments focused strictly on the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Kenya and Tanzania that comprise the original hotspot. This report aims to assess the impact made possible by CEPF investment and is based upon grant recipients’ project performance and final reports. All available final reports can be accessed from the publications section of the CEPF Web site, www.cepf.net.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Profile for Tanzania Mainland 2014 District Volume II Including Threats Prioritisation
    Coastal Profile for Tanzania Mainland 2014 District Volume II Including Threats Prioritisation Investment Prioritisation for Resilient Livelihoods and Ecosystems in Coastal Zones of Tanzania List of Contents List of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. x List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... xiii Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................... xiv Table of Units ....................................................................................................................................... xviii 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 19 Coastal Areas ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Vulnerable Areas under Pressure ..................................................................................................................... 19 Tanzania...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]