Boudicca, the Iceni Queen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Boudicca, the Iceni Queen Almost 2000 years ago there was a Celtic tribe called the Iceni that lived in Norfolk. Their ruler was called Prasutagus and his wife was Boudicca. When Romans came to Britain they promised Prasutagus to leave his people in peace. Unfortunately, when Prasutagus died, the Romans broke their promise and turned on the Iceni people. They stole from them, made people slaves and even whipped Boudicca and her daughters. Boudicca was very angry and decided to fight back. She asked other tribes to join her and formed an army called the Britons. One day the Britons led by Boudicca attacked the Romans. They managed to destroy Colchester and defeat a part of the Roman army. Then they carried on and also destroyed Londinium (today’s London) and Verulamium (today’s St. Albans). Over 70 000 people died in the battles. Later on the Roman army managed to regroup and eventually defeated Boudicca and the Britons. No one knows what happened to Boudicca. Some people say she was killed in the battle, some say she fell ill and died. But it remains a mystery. A Roman writer called Dio described Boudicca as a tall woman with red hair hanging below her waist. She had a harsh voice and piercing glare. She wore a large golden necklace, a colourful tunic and a thick cloak fastened by a brooch. Boudicca is famous for her inspirational speech to her people: “I am fighting as someone like you who has lost their freedom. I am fighting for my bruised body. The gods will grant us the revenge we deserve. Think of how many of us are fighting, and why. Then you will win this battle or die. That is what I, a woman, plan to do. Let the men live as slaves if they want. I won’t!” This is a statue of Boudicca near Westminster in London..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Colchester and Ipswich Museum Service Ancient Gold of the Iceni
Colchester and Ipswich Museum Service Ancient gold of the Iceni found in Suffolk A morning’s metal detecting back in 2008 lead to the discovery of 840 Iron Age gold coins - the largest hoard of its type found in Britain in over 150 years. Now Colchester and Ipswich Museum Service has until the end of June to raise £300,000 to save this outstanding archaeological treasure for the nation and people of Suffolk. The coins were buried just over 2000 years ago by members of the Iceni tribe whose kingdom covered Norfolk, north Suffolk and parts of Cambridgeshire. The coins were buried about 40 years before queen Boudica led her famous revolt against the Romans. They offer an unparalleled glimpse into life on the eve of the Roman invasion and are part of the origins and long history of Suffolk communities. Whilst the museum gets down to the business of fundraising people will be able to have a sneak preview of 200 of the coins at Ipswich Museum from May 3 rd until June 10 th . The coins officially belong to the Crown until the museum has raised the money to buy them and they are on display with special permission from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Caroline McDonald, Curator of archaeology at the museum is particularly excited at their arrival. ‘Suffolk earth has revealed some of the nations most outstanding treasure finds in recent decades. The Amazing Anglo-Saxon ship burial at Sutton Hoo in 1939, the stunning silver Roman dinner service found at Mildenhall during World War II and more recently the Hoxne hoard of Roman coins and artefacts found in the 1990s.
[Show full text]
Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410
no nonsense Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410 – interpretation ltd interpretation Contract number 1446 May 2011 no nonsense–interpretation ltd 27 Lyth Hill Road Bayston Hill Shrewsbury SY3 0EW www.nononsense-interpretation.co.uk Cadw would like to thank Richard Brewer, Research Keeper of Roman Archaeology, Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, for his insight, help and support throughout the writing of this plan. Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47-410 Cadw 2011 no nonsense-interpretation ltd 2 Contents 1. Roman conquest, occupation and settlement of Wales AD 47410 .............................................. 5 1.1 Relationship to other plans under the HTP............................................................................. 5 1.2 Linking our Roman assets ....................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Sites not in Wales .................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Criteria for the selection of sites in this plan .......................................................................... 9 2. Why read this plan? ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Aim what we want to achieve ........................................................................................... 10 2.2 Objectives.............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
A Very Rough Guide to the Main DNA Sources of the Counties of The
A Very Rough Guide To the Main DNA Sources of the Counties of the British Isles (NB This only includes the major contributors - others will have had more limited input) TIMELINE (AD) ? - 43 43 - c410 c410 - 878 c878 - 1066 1066 -> c1086 1169 1283 -> c1289 1290 (limited) (limited) Normans (limited) Region Pre 1974 County Ancient Britons Romans Angles / Saxon / Jutes Norwegians Danes conq Engl inv Irel conq Wales Isle of Man ENGLAND Cornwall Dumnonii Saxon Norman Devon Dumnonii Saxon Norman Dorset Durotriges Saxon Norman Somerset Durotriges (S), Belgae (N) Saxon Norman South West South Wiltshire Belgae (S&W), Atrebates (N&E) Saxon Norman Gloucestershire Dobunni Saxon Norman Middlesex Catuvellauni Saxon Danes Norman Berkshire Atrebates Saxon Norman Hampshire Belgae (S), Atrebates (N) Saxon Norman Surrey Regnenses Saxon Norman Sussex Regnenses Saxon Norman Kent Canti Jute then Saxon Norman South East South Oxfordshire Dobunni (W), Catuvellauni (E) Angle Norman Buckinghamshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Bedfordshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Hertfordshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Essex Trinovantes Saxon Danes Norman Suffolk Trinovantes (S & mid), Iceni (N) Angle Danes Norman Norfolk Iceni Angle Danes Norman East Anglia East Cambridgeshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Huntingdonshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Northamptonshire Catuvellauni (S), Coritani (N) Angle Danes Norman Warwickshire Coritani (E), Cornovii (W) Angle Norman Worcestershire Dobunni (S), Cornovii (N) Angle Norman Herefordshire Dobunni (S), Cornovii
[Show full text]
RULES of PLAY COIN Series, Volume VIII by Marc Gouyon-Rety
The Fall of Roman Britain RULES OF PLAY COIN Series, Volume VIII by Marc Gouyon-Rety T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 1.0 Introduction ............................2 6.0 Epoch Rounds .........................18 2.0 Sequence of Play ........................6 7.0 Victory ...............................20 3.0 Commands .............................7 8.0 Non-Players ...........................21 4.0 Feats .................................14 Key Terms Index ...........................35 5.0 Events ................................17 Setup and Scenarios.. 37 © 2017 GMT Games LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232 • www.GMTGames.com 2 Pendragon ~ Rules of Play • 58 Stronghold “castles” (10 red [Forts], 15 light blue [Towns], 15 medium blue [Hillforts], 6 green [Scotti Settlements], 12 black [Saxon Settlements]) (1.4) • Eight Faction round cylinders (2 red, 2 blue, 2 green, 2 black; 1.8, 2.2) • 12 pawns (1 red, 1 blue, 6 white, 4 gray; 1.9, 3.1.1) 1.0 Introduction • A sheet of markers • Four Faction player aid foldouts (3.0. 4.0, 7.0) Pendragon is a board game about the fall of the Roman Diocese • Two Epoch and Battles sheets (2.0, 3.6, 6.0) of Britain, from the first large-scale raids of Irish, Pict, and Saxon raiders to the establishment of successor kingdoms, both • A Non-Player Guidelines Summary and Battle Tactics sheet Celtic and Germanic. It adapts GMT Games’ “COIN Series” (8.1-.4, 8.4.2) game system about asymmetrical conflicts to depict the political, • A Non-Player Event Instructions foldout (8.2.1) military, religious, and economic affairs of 5th Century Britain.
[Show full text]
The Defeat of Boudicca's Rebellion
Boudicca, Queen of the Iceni and leader of the rebellion against Roman domination, was defeated in battle in 61 A.D. Fact. But where was that battle fought and how did the outnumbered Romans manage to win? In this brief book local military historian Martin Marix Evans explains his theory that the fight took place just south of Towcester in Northamptonshire. His version of the story informed the August 2004 BBC Battlefield Britain programme on the rebellion, and this book includes a guide to the public footpaths visitors can use to see the site for themselves. Published by Gemini Press, Towcester © Martin Marix Evans, 2004. Artwork by courtesy of Osprey Publishing, Oxford. Cover illustration: A British chariot warrior of the 1st century. © Osprey Publishing Ltd Martin Marix Evans h Introduction Local tradition has it that a battle was fought in ancient times at Toothole or Toothill, south of Towcester. This name happens also to be that of a field to the left of the stream that flows through Cuttle Mill, three kilometres (two miles) south-east of the town, towards the River Tove. The legends go as far as claiming it as the site of Boudicca’s defeat by the Romans in AD61. Given that the site is close to the Roman road we know as Watling Street, added to which Towcester itself was a Roman town, the story might not be untrue; at least the possibility of its being true seemed to me worth investigating. A number of questions had to be answered: What were the opposing forces like? What were their fighting methods and usual tactics? What reports survive of these events? What clues do we have about the physical characteristics of the location in which the battle took place? Is there a way in which we can home in on the likely location, either by examining the landscape or by considering military strategy or, best of all, both of these? These questions are in no particular order because all of them matter.
[Show full text]
'J.E. Lloyd and His Intellectual Legacy: the Roman Conquest and Its Consequences Reconsidered' : Emyr W. Williams
J.E. Lloyd and his intellectual legacy: the Roman conquest and its consequences reconsidered,1 by E.W. Williams In an earlier article,2 the adequacy of J.E.Lloyd’s analysis of the territories ascribed to the pre-Roman tribes of Wales was considered. It was concluded that his concept of pre- Roman tribal boundaries contained major flaws. A significantly different map of those tribal territories was then presented. Lloyd’s analysis of the course and consequences of the Roman conquest of Wales was also revisited. He viewed Wales as having been conquered but remaining largely as a militarised zone throughout the Roman period. From the 1920s, Lloyd's analysis was taken up and elaborated by Welsh archaeology, then at an early stage of its development. It led to Nash-Williams’s concept of Wales as ‘a great defensive quadrilateral’ centred on the legionary fortresses at Chester and Caerleon. During recent decades whilst Nash-Williams’s perspective has been abandoned by Welsh archaeology, it has been absorbed in an elaborated form into the narrative of Welsh history. As a consequence, whilst Welsh history still sustains a version of Lloyd’s original thesis, the archaeological community is moving in the opposite direction. Present day archaeology regards the subjugation of Wales as having been completed by 78 A.D., with the conquest laying the foundations for a subsequent process of assimilation of the native population into Roman society. By the middle of the 2nd century A.D., that development provided the basis for a major demilitarisation of Wales. My aim in this article is to cast further light on the course of the Roman conquest of Wales and the subsequent process of assimilating the native population into Roman civil society.
[Show full text]
History Boudicca's Attack on Colchester Please Watch the Following Video: If
History Boudicca’s attack on Colchester Please watch the following video: https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/clips/zk3b4wx If you cannot watch the video, look at the transcript below: Transcript of video: Colchecter was built in Roman style, all the usual features. Forum: Roman marketplace,basilica: government building, Temple….. “How do you know that?” “It was emperor Claudius’ temple, wasn’t it?” “Yes.” “The one especially built to celebrate his victory?” “Yes.” “And the one destroyed by the Iceni tribe, who if I remember rightly, were Clets!” “Yes, but they didn’t destroy it all did they?” “Didn’t they?” “No, you can still see signs of it in that building over there.” “That’s not a Roman building” “No, but the signs of us Romans can be found… underneath!” “There you are, the foundations of the temple. Those are 100% Roman.” “Shame they are not 100% here.” “Rom, remind me exactly what happened here in Colchester. Surely we Celts didn’t get the better of your splendid Roman army!” “Can’t quite remember to tell you the truth.” “Can’t you? Well I think I may be able to. I believe it had something to do to Boudicca, who if my memory serves me well, wasn’t only a Celt, but a woman, and a very brave one too.” “Boudicca? Never heard of her.” “Well I expect your gadget will be able to tell us” “Very well” (plays a button on a device) From device: Boudicca was Queen of the Iceni tribe, a group of Celts who lived north of Colchester.
[Show full text]
Celtic Britain
1 arfg Fitam ©0 © © © © ©©© © © © © © © 00 « G XT © 8 i imiL ii II I IWtv,-.,, iM » © © © © © ©H HWIW© llk< © © J.Rhjsffi..H. © I EARLY BRITAIN, CELTIC BRITAIN. BY J. RHYS, M.A., D.Litt. (Oxon/). Honorary LL.D. (Edin.). Honorary D.Litt. (Wales). FROFESSOR OF CELTIC IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD J PRINCIPAL OF JESUS COLLEGE, AND LATE FELLOW OF MERTON COLLEGE FELLOW OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY. WITH TWO MAPS, AND WOODCUTS OF COIliS, FOURTH EDITION. FUBLISHED UNDER THE D.RECTION OF THE GENERAL LITERATURE COMMITTEE. LONDON: SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE, NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE, W.C. ; 43, queen victoria street, e.c. \ Brighton: 129, north street. New York : EDWIN S. GORHAM. iqoP, HA 1^0 I "l C>9 |X)VE AND MALCOMSON, LIMITED, PRINTERS, 4 AND 5, DEAN STREET, HIGH HOLBORN, LONDON, W.C. PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. These are the days of little books, and when the author was asked to add one to their number, he accepted the invitation with the jaunty simplicity of an inexperienced hand, thinking that it could not give him much trouble to expand or otherwise modify the account given of early Britain in larger works ; but closer acquaintance with them soon convinced him of the folly of such a plan— he had to study the subject for himself or leave it alone. In trying to do the former he probably read enough to have enabled him to write a larger work than this ; but he would be ashamed to confess how long it has occupied him. As a student of language, he is well aware that no severer judgment could be passed on his essay in writing history than that it should be found to be as bad as the etymologies made by historians are wont to be ; but so essential is the study of Celtic names to the elucidation of the early history of Britain that the risk is thought worth incurring.
[Show full text]
Prehistoric Britain
Prehistoric Britain Plated disc brooch Kent, England Late 6th or early 7th century AD Bronze boars from the Hounslow Hoard 1st century BC-1st century AD Hounslow, Middlesex, England Visit resource for teachers Key Stage 2 Prehistoric Britain Contents Before your visit Background information Resources Gallery information Preliminary activities During your visit Gallery activities: introduction for teachers Gallery activities: briefings for adult helpers Gallery activity: Neolithic mystery objects Gallery activity: Looking good in the Neolithic Gallery activity: Neolithic farmers Gallery activity: Bronze Age pot Gallery activity: Iron Age design Gallery activity: An Iron Age hoard After your visit Follow-up activities Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Background information Prehistoric Britain Archaeologists and historians use the term ‘Prehistory’ to refer to a time in a people’s history before they used a written language. In Britain the term Prehistory refers to the period before Britain became part of the Roman empire in AD 43. The prehistoric period in Britain lasted for hundreds of thousands of years and this long period of time is usually divided into: Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic (sometimes these three periods are combined and called the Stone Age), Bronze Age and Iron Age. Each of these periods might also be sub-divided into early, middle and late. The Palaeolithic is often divided into lower, middle and upper. Early Britain British Isles: Humans probably first arrived in Britain around 800,000 BC. These early inhabitants had to cope with extreme environmental changes and they left Britain at least seven times when conditions became too bad.
[Show full text]
Changes in Celtic Consumption: Roman Influence on Faunal-Based Diets of the Atrebates
CHANGES IN CELTIC CONSUMPTION: ROMAN INFLUENCE ON FAUNAL-BASED DIETS OF THE ATREBATES by Alexander Frey Submitted to the Faculty of The Archaeological Studies Program Department of Archaeology and Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Alexander Frey All rights reserved ii CHANGES IN CELTIC CONSUMPTION: ROMAN INFLUENCE ON FAUNAL DIETS OF THE ATREBATES Alexander Frey, B.A. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, 2016 This study addresses cultural impacts of the Roman Empire on the British Celtic group, the Atrebates. The Atrebates held large portions of land in southern Britain, and upon Roman invasion in A.D. 43, became a client kingdom of the Roman Empire. With Roman rule also came Roman animal husbandry and consumption habits, reflected in archaeological faunal remains. To better understand this dietary transition, 23 faunal datasets were analyzed from within and around the capital city of Calleva Atrebatum, spanning from the pre-Roman Britain Iron Age to the post-Roman Saxon Age. In the analysis, published Number of Individual Specimens (NISP) and Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI) values were assessed to examine changes in the prominence of sheep, pigs, and cattle over time. This research demonstrates the pervasive impact of the Roman Empire on populations with whom they interacted, changing not only governing bodies, but also dietary practices. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the wonderful help and support from my friends and family during the process of writing this thesis. Special thanks to my readers, Dr. David A.
[Show full text]
Map 8 Britannia Superior Compiled by A.S
Map 8 Britannia Superior Compiled by A.S. Esmonde-Cleary, 1996 with the assistance of R. Warner (Ireland) Introduction Britain has a long tradition of antiquarian and archaeological investigation and recording of its Roman past, reaching back to figures such as Leland in the sixteenth century. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the classically-educated aristocracy and gentry of a major imperial and military power naturally felt an affinity with the evidence for Rome’s presence in Britain. In the twentieth century, the development of archaeology as a discipline in its own right reinforced this interest in the Roman period, resulting in intense survey and excavation on Roman sites and commensurate work on artifacts and other remains. The cartographer is therefore spoiled for choice, and must determine the objectives of a map with care so as to know what to include and what to omit, and on what grounds. British archaeology already has a long tradition of systematization, sometimes based on regions as in the work of the Royal Commissions on (Ancient and) Historic Monuments for England (Scotland and Wales), but also on types of site or monument. Consequently, there are available compendia by Rivet (1979) on the ancient evidence for geography and toponymy; Wacher (1995) on the major towns; Burnham (1990) on the “small towns”; Margary (1973) on the roads that linked them; and Scott (1993) on villas. These works give a series of internally consistent catalogs of the major types of site. Maps of Roman Britain conventionally show the island with its modern coastline, but it is clear that there have been extensive changes since antiquity, and that the conventional approach risks understating the differences between the ancient and the modern.
[Show full text]
Boudicca's Rebellion Against the Roman Empire in 60 AD Daniel Cohen Union College - Schenectady, NY
Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2016 Boudicca's Rebellion Against the Roman Empire in 60 AD Daniel Cohen Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Celtic Studies Commons, European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Cohen, Daniel, "Boudicca's Rebellion Against the Roman Empire in 60 AD" (2016). Honors Theses. 135. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/135 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Boudicca’s Rebellion Against the Roman Empire in 60 AD By Daniel Cohen ********* Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History UNION COLLEGE June, 2016 ii ABSTRACT Cohen, Daniel Boudicca’s Rebellion Against the Roman Empire in 60 AD This paper examines the rebellion of Boudicca, the queen of the Iceni tribe, during the Roman Empire’s occupation of Britannia in 60 AD. The study shows that had Boudicca not changed her winning strategy in one key battle, she could have forced the Roman Empire to withdraw their presence from Britannia, at least until it was prudent to invade again. This paper analyzes the few extant historical accounts available on Boudicca, namely those of the Roman historians Tacitus and Cassius Dio, to explore the effectiveness of tactics on both sides of the rebellion.
[Show full text]