Arxiv:2012.02436V5 [Physics.Ins-Det] 18 May 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Prepared for submission to JINST Design and Commissioning of the PandaX-4T Cryogenic Distillation System for Krypton and Radon Removal Xiangyi Cui,0,2 Zhou Wang,1,2,1 Yonglin Ju3,1 Xiuli Wang,3 Huaxuan Liu,3 Wenbo Ma,1 Jianglai Liu,0,1,2 Li Zhao,1,2 Xiangdong Ji0,1,4 Shuaijie Li,0 Rui Yan,3 Haidong Sha,3 Peiyao Huang,3 Jifang Zhou, 5 Changsong Shang, 5 Liqiang Liu 5 0Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China 1INPAC and School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai 200240, China 2Shanghai Jiao Tong University Sichuan Research Institute, Chengdu 610000, China 3Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240, China 4Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA 5 Yalong River Hydropower Development Company, Ltd., Chengdu 610051, China E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: An online cryogenic distillation system for the removal of krypton and radon from xenon was designed and constructed for PandaX-4T, a highly sensitive dark matter detection experiment. The krypton content in a commercial xenon product is expected to be reduced by 7 orders of magnitude with 99% xenon collection efficiency at a flow rate of 10 kg/h by design. The same system can reduce radon content in xenon by reversed operation, with an expected radon reduction factor of about 1.8 in PandaX-4T under a flow rate of 56.5 kg/h. The commissioning of this system was completed, with krypton and radon operations tested under respective working conditions. The krypton concentration of the product xenon was measured with an upper limit of 8.0 ppt. Keywords: Distillation; Kr removal; Rn removal; Dark Matter; PandaX arXiv:2012.02436v5 [physics.ins-det] 18 May 2021 1Corresponding author. Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Design of the column2 2.1 Distillation method for the Kr and Rn2 2.2 Column design method4 2.2.1 Reflux ratio and number of theoretical plates5 2.2.2 Superficial velocity and the column diameter6 2.3 Radon removal8 2.3.1 Radon reduction without tower emanation8 2.3.2 Radon reduction with tower emanation9 2.3.3 Estimate radon reduction factor in the PandaX-4T detector 10 3 Construction of the tower 11 4 Operation modes of the distillation tower 12 5 Commissioning operation and optimization 13 5.1 Efficiency of the heat exchanger 14 5.2 Gas loading and the optimization 14 5.3 Production krypton measurement 15 6 Conclusion 15 1 Introduction In recent years, liquid xenon has been a leading target in the dark matter direct detection experi- ments [1–8]. The PandaX project consists of a series of xenon-based experiments located at the China Jinping Underground Laboratory (CJPL) [9, 10]. The PandaX-I and PandaX-II are the two completed experiments, utilizing gas-liquid dual-phase xenon Time Projection Chambers (TPCs) with targets of 120 kg and 580 kg, respectively. PandaX-4T is the new generation experiment, which has a target of 4-ton liquid xenon. The expected sensitivity of PandaX-4T is better than 10−47 cm2 to dark matter-nucleon spin-independent cross section for a dark matter mass around 40 GeV/c2 [11], a 10-fold improvement in comparison to PandaX-II. 85Kr and 222Rn are the two most important intrinsic contaminants of radioisotopes in liquid xenon detectors. 85Kr, continually increased in the atmosphere [12], has a half-life of 10.76 years. At present time, its concentration in natural krypton is about 2 × 10−11 mol/mol. The different physical properties between xenon and krypton make it possible to separate krypton from xenon, via distillation [13] or adsorption [14]. The cryogenic distillation method, based on the different boiling – 1 – points of krypton and xenon, was used in XMASS [15], PandaX-II [16, 17], XENON100 [18], and has achieved a reduction of krypton level by three orders of magnitude for one pass. The upgraded distillation system of XMASS could reduce the amount of krypton by five orders of magnitude with one pass [19]. In the recent result of the XENON1T distillation system [20], the krypton reduction factor of 6.5×105 is achieved. On the other hand, the LUX experiment used the adsorption-based gas chromatography method, which decreased the krypton concentration by a Kr reduction factor of 3×104 for each batch [21, 22]. 222Rn is a decay progeny of 238U, therefore is emanating continuously from detector materials, pipes, and parts in direct contact with xenon. Radon can easily diffuse into the liquid xenon, then distributes homogeneously in the target volume as its half-life is 3.8 days. One of the daughter isotopes, 214Pb, is a V-emitter and an important background in the liquid xenon detector. The achieved 222Rn activity is 10.3 `Bq/kg in XMASS [3], 4.5 `Bq/kg in XENON1T experiment [23], and 32 `Bq/kg (214Pb) in LUX [22]. The XENON100 collaboration demonstrated the feasibility of radon removal by online distillation at a flow rate of 4.5 standard liters per minute (slpm), under which a radon reduction factor of 27 was achieved [24]. On the other hand, XMASS and LZ have developed adsorption-based gas chromatography method [25, 26] to reduce the radon concentration. In order to improve the sensitivity to search for dark matter by more than one order of mag- nitude, the PandaX-4T experiment requires a krypton concentration of less than 0.1 ppt [11]. This specification poses significant technical challenge to the distillation tower. The 222Rn concentration in PandaX-II, on the other hand, was measured to be ∼32 `Bq/kg (3.3×10−24 mol/mol) [7, 27]. Additional reduction method in radon level is desired as well. This paper presents a high efficiency cryogenic distillation column which has been initially designed and constructed for the krypton removal, with an increased purification speed of 10 kg/h and an expected reduction factor of 107 for krypton. Reversed radon distillation, compared to the krypton removal, with the same column is considered in design. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The design of the distillation column is described in section2. The hardware setup and standard operation modes are discussed in section3 and section4. The commissioning of the column and results are discussed in section5, before we conclude in section6. 2 Design of the column The boiling points of the krypton, radon and xenon are 120 K, 211 K and 165 K under the atmosphere pressure, respectively. This indicates that the krypton and radon removal process could be implemented at the same temperature near the xenon boiling point. During the krypton distillation operation, krypton is the more volatile component, which is enriched in the gaseous phase. Conversely, xenon is the more volatile component compared to radon in the radon removal process, so that radon will be enriched in the liquid phase. 2.1 Distillation method for the Kr and Rn The separation power to different gas species by the distillation can be quantified by the relative volatility U, which is the ratio of the saturation vapor pressures. The saturation vapor pressure curves versus temperature for krypton, xenon and radon are shown in figure1[28, 29]. The operation temperature is chosen to be 178 K, considering the narrow temperature range of the liquid xenon – 2 – phase. At this temperature, the ratio of volatility between Kr and Xe (UKrº is 10.7 and that between Xe and Rn (URnº is 11.3. 104 103 102 10 Krypton Saturated vapor Pressure [kPa] 1 Xenon Radon 10−1 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200 Temperature [K] Figure 1. Saturation vapor pressure curves for Kr, Rn, Xe. Raoult’s law and Dalton’s law are used for the ideal gas and liquid to derive the concentration of the volatile component at equilibrium state. The relationship of the volatile component concentration in the gaseous phase (H) and in the liquid phase (G) at the state of equilibrium is defined by eq. (2.1): U · G H = . (2.1) 1 ¸ ¹U − 1º · G The packed column can be segmented to several theoretical stages, in which the gas-liquid equilibrium is maintained. As shown in figure2, the feeding flow is injected in the feeding stage with the flow rate 퐹 and the concentration of volatile component H퐹 . Volatile component is enriched in the rectifying section above the feeding stage, which achieves a content H퐷 eventually in the ceiling stage with an extracted flow rate of 퐷. On the other side of the distillation column, the less volatile component is depleted stage by stage in the stripping section below the feeding stage, and the content declines to G, eventually in the base stage with an extracted flow rate of ,. Eq. (2.2) shows the conservation equations of the total mass flow and the concentration of volatile component, respectively. 퐹 = 퐷 ¸ ,, (2.2a) 퐹 · H퐹 = 퐷 · H퐷 ¸ , · G, . (2.2b) Reflux ratio ' is another important factor, defined as the ratio of the reflux liquid mass flow ! and the extracted gas mass flow 퐷 in the top condenser (' = !/퐷). It determines the liquid and vapor mass flow rate in the column, along with a liquid fraction @ in the feeding flow. During the – 3 – Top Gas D yD Condenser L y1 Equilibrium 1 Rectifying Section Equilibrium m xm ym+1 Equilibrium m+1 Fed F Equilibrium yF or xF Equilibrium n xn yn+1 Equilibrium n+1 Stripping Equilibrium N Section xN Bottom Liquid W Reboiler xW Figure 2.