Performance Practice Review Volume 3 Article 2 Number 1 Spring Questions concerning the Edition of the 'Goldberg Variations' in the Neue Bach Ausgabe Erich Schwandt Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr Part of the Music Practice Commons Schwandt, Erich (1990) "Questions concerning the Edition of the 'Goldberg Variations' in the Neue Bach Ausgabe," Performance Practice Review: Vol. 3: No. 1, Article 2. DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.199003.01.2 Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol3/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Performance Practice Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Editing Problems Questions Concerning the Edition of the 'Goldberg Variations* in the Neue Bach Ausgabe Erich Schwandt The world has been waiting for almost 250 years for a completely authoritative text of the "Goldberg Variations," which were published in Bach's lifetime (in 1741 or 1742) as the fourth part of the Clavierilbung. Balthasar Schmid of Nuremburg engraved them with great care; nonetheless, his elegant engraving contained a few wrong notes, and some slurs, ties, accidentals, and ornament signs were inadvertently omitted. In addition, some of the ornaments are ambiguous, and some blurred. In the absence of Bach's autograph, Schmid's engraving must remain the primary source for the "Goldberg Variations," and Bach's own 'corrected' copy1 takes pride of place over the other extant copies corrected by Bach. When the Bach Gesellschaft (hereafter BGA) published the "Goldberg Variations" in 18532, the editor, C.