DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ethnic Triangle: State, Majority and Minority in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ethnic Triangle: State, Majority and Minority in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarBank@NUS THE ETHNIC TRIANGLE: STATE, MAJORITY AND MINORITY IN INDONESIA, MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE SUN TSAI-WEI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2010 THE ETHNIC TRIANGLE: STATE, MAJORITY AND MINORITY IN INDONESIA, MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE SUN TSAI-WEI MA (National Taiwan Univ.; UCLA) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe thanks to many people for helping me during my doctoral work. My deepest gratitude goes first and foremost to Associate Professor Hussin Mutalib, my main supervisor, for his constant encouragement and guidance. Words cannot express my gratitude for Professor Hussin’s firm support and illuminating comments. Most importantly, without his patience with my slow writing process, this thesis could not have reached its present form. I would also like to record my heartfelt gratitude to my three co-supervisors: Dr. Kenneth Paul Tan, Dr. Jamie Davidson, and Dr. Wang Cheng-Lung, for their valuable comments and suggestions on the draft of my thesis. I particularly appreciate their tolerance of my insistence on writing this thesis my way. I am also greatly indebted to the professors at the Department of Political Science—Professor Shamsul Haque, A/P Lee Lai To, Dr. Kilkon Ko, Dr. Ethan Putterman, and Dr. Bradley Williams—for their kind words of encouragement and support during my time at NUS. I also owe my sincere gratitude to my friends and my fellow classmates Yew Chiew Ping, Ang Ming Chee, and Andy Mickey Choong, who assisted me in adapting to life in Singapore, preparing for my qualifying exams and fieldworks, as well as lending a listening ear and helping me work out my problems during the difficult course of my study. Because of them and many other friends at NUS and Taiwan, I had a joyful and memorable time in the past five years. i I would also like to thank the National University of Singapore for awarding me a Research Scholarship for four years and the Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies, RCHSS, Academia Sinica (Taiwan) for providing me a Ph.D Candidate Research Grant during my final stage of thesis writing. Both funds enabled me to carry on with my research. Lastly, my thanks go to my life-time mentor Professor Wu Yu-shan, my dearest father Professor Sun Chen-ching and mother Huang Hsien-rong, and my sweetest husband Dr. Liao Chien-neng, for their loving support and confidence in me all through these years. At this time when I am writing this acknowledgement, I thank God not only for the completion of this thesis, but more so for having them. Tsai-wei February 2010 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Table of Contents iii Summary v List of Tables and Figures vi CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1 The Argument 4 Research Method and Data Source 8 Thesis Organization 11 CHAPTER II: THEORIES OF ETHNIC CONFLICT AND VIOLENCE 13 Literature Review and Alternative Framework 13 The Ethnic Triangle 25 Conclusion 49 CHAPTER III: ETHNIC DIFFERENCE, DISCRIMINATION, AND ETHNIC 51 CONFLICT: A CROSS-NATIONAL STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Ethnic Difference, Discrimination, and Ethnic Conflict 51 The Chinese in Southeast Asia 72 CHAPTER IV: INDONESIA 1950-2009 79 Phase I (1950-1965): Formation of the State-Minority Alliance and its Breakup 80 Phase II (1966-1998): From State-Pribumi Marriage to a Stable Unit-Veto Triangle 89 Phase III (1998-2009): A Romantic Triangle in the Democratization Era 111 Summary and Conclusion 127 CHAPTER V: MALAYSIA 1957-2008 131 Phase I (1957-1969): the Breakdown of the State-Chinese Marriage 132 Phase II (1970-1987): the Consolidation of the State-Malay Marriage 142 Phase III (1988-2008): the Ups and Downs of the State-Malay Relations 157 Summary and Conclusion 169 CHAPTER VI: SINGAPORE 1965-2008 173 Phase I (1965-1979): From Unit-Veto to Romantic Triangle 174 Phase II (1979-1988): the Outcast State? 188 Phase III (1988-2008): the “ Ménage à Trois” Triangle and its Challenges 203 Summary and Conclusion 218 CHAPTER VII: CONCLUSION 221 The Ethnic Triangle: Purposes and Concepts 221 The Ethnic Triangle: The Empirical Applications 225 Conclusion: Implications of the “Ethnic Triangle Paradigm” to Future Research 233 BIBLIOGRAPHY 237 iii APPENDICES A: Employed MAR Variables in Chapter III 263 B-1: State-Pribumi -Chinese Conflict Incidents and Government Responses, Indonesia 265 B-2: State-Malay-Chinese Conflict Incidents and Government Responses, Malaysia 268 B-3: State-Chinese-Malay Conflict Incidents and Government Responses, Singapore 269 C: GDP Growth Rate (%) of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore, 1961-2007 270 iv SUMMARY Conventional studies of ethnic conflict and violence have offered general explanations as to the factors that variously influence the escalation of conflicts into violence. The validity of such explanations, by and large, has been confirmed via numerous empirical and quantitative research studies. This particular study, however, does not intend to figure out which factors are more important in bringing about ethnic conflict and violence but rather, is more concerned with interpreting how the various “master cleavages” in selected countries affect ethnic groups and inter-ethnic relations in general. More specifically, this thesis aims to investigate “the processes” by which Governments adopt in managing ethnic relations, specifically, the series of institutional arrangements or policy designs, which in turn lead to changes in the balance of ethnic groups’ relative status and strength. Given the dynamic characteristic of inter-ethnic relations, especially majority-minority relations, invariably, there are bound to be different responses from ethnic groups of such state-initiated policy moves. In turn, these could force the government to further mediate, if not amend, its policies—with the similar corresponding chain reactions from affected ethnic groups, being repeated again and again. It is argued in this thesis that such processes, although admittedly dynamic and somewhat complicated, can actually be better understood through the “ethnic triangle model”, which is adapted from the “strategic triangle” theory in international relations. Applying this theoretical paradigm, this dissertation reviews and analyzes the dynamic, on-going change consequent to State actions, in the relationships among the principal actors in the “triangle”, namely, the State, the Chinese, and the indigenous population, in three post-colonial countries—Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. v LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES A. Tables Table 2-1: Ethnic Triangle and Ethnic Violence 43 Table 3-1: Selected Countries and Ethnic Groups 54 Table 3-2: Descriptive Statistics 59 Table 3-3: Correlation Coefficients Between Independent Variables 63 Table 3-4: Regression Results for Three Types of Ethnic Conflict 65 Table 3-5: The Chinese in Southeast Asian Countries 73 Table 4-1: Indonesian Parliamentary Election Results, 1971-2009 95 Table 5-1: Institutional Sources of Malay Electoral Advantage, 1955-2004 136 Table 5-2: Malaysian Parliamentary Election Results, 1959-2008 142 Table 5-3: Mean Monthly Household Income and Poverty Rates, 1970-2007 152 Table 5-4: Ownership of Share Capital of Limited Companies (%), 1970-2004 152 Table 5-5: Demographic Transition in Malaysia, 1970-2000 163 Table 6-1: Singaporean Parliamentary Election Results, 1968-2006 186 Table 6-2: Key Educational and Economic Indicators of the Resident Population 193 Table 6-3: Revealed Ethnic Preferences in the Resale Market for HDB Flats 201 Table 6-4: Distribution of SMD/GRC MPs and Opposition Performance 204 Table 6-5: Elected MPs and Ethnicity, 1968-2006 212 B. Figures Figure 2-1: The strategic Triangle 27 Figure 2-2: Analytical Framework of the Research 50 Figure 4-1: Shifts of the Ethnic Triangle in Indonesia, 1950-2009 80 Figure 5-1: Shifts of the Ethnic Triangle in Malaysia, 1957-2008 131 Figure 5-2: Number of Parliament Seats won by Major Political Forces, 1959-2008 166 Figure 6-1: Shifts of the Ethnic Triangle in Singapore, 1965-2008 172 Figure 6-2: Educational Performance by Malays and Chinese, 1980-2008 217 Figure 7-1: Multiple Ethnic Triangles 225 vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION This dissertation adapts an international relations theory, the “strategic triangle” model, to interpret the dynamic changes in relations between the state and ethnic groups over time. Using this model, it assesses the likelihood of ethnic violence in general and the nature of relations between ethnic Chinese and native populations in three Southeast Asian countries—Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore—in particular. Specifically, this study focuses on the effects of policy and institutional factors on state-majority-minority relations, which lead to either ethnic peace or ethnic violence. Over the last decade, ethnic and nationalist strife across the world has drawn both public and academic attention to ethno-cultural violence as a “striking symptom of the ‘new world disorder’” (Brubaker & Laitin, 1998: 424). Recognizing that ethnic war or peace has profound effects on prospects for democracy and economic growth in many countries 1, a multitude of explanations has been offered to account for the causes of ethnic violence. These include primordial-cultural, socio-economic, and political factors that contribute to ethnic mobilization and conflict. Scholars and policy-makers have also sought ways of managing ethnic tension and preventing potential violent conflict. These include various designs of constitutional and electoral systems, elite level negotiation and co-operation, and, as a last resort, interventions by international peacekeeping institutions. A review of some of the major research in ethnic-conflict studies will be presented in Chapter II. It appears that some are more theory-oriented, 1 For empirical reports on the effect of ethnic conflict on economic growth, see Alesina, et al. (1999), Easterly & Levine (1997), and Rodrik (1999) for some of the examples. For discussions on the relationship between ethnic heterogeneity on the one hand, and political participation, social capital, and the fate of democracy on the other hand, see Alesina & La Ferrara (2000) and Horowitz (1993).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ethnicity and Poverty-Reduction: the Case for a Differentiated Treatment for Indigenous Tribal Peoples ....13 Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers
    Indigenous and Tribal Peoples: An Ethnic Audit of Selected Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Indigenous and Tribal Peoples: An Ethnic Audit of Selected Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers by Manuela Tomei International Labour Office, Geneva Copyright © International Labour Organization 2005 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the Publications Bureau (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP [Fax: (+44) (0)20 7631 5500; email: [email protected]], in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 [Fax: (+1) (978) 750 4470; email: [email protected]] or in other countries with associated Reproduction Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. ISBN 92-2-117451-4 (print) ISBN 92-2-117452-2 (web pdf) First published 2005 The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Transnational Media Flow in Nusantara: Cross-Border Content Broadcasting in Indonesia and Malaysia
    Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 49, No. 2, September 2011 Revisiting Transnational Media Flow in Nusantara: Cross-border Content Broadcasting in Indonesia and Malaysia Nuurrianti Jalli* and Yearry Panji Setianto** Previous studies on transnational media have emphasized transnational media organizations and tended to ignore the role of cross-border content, especially in a non-Western context. This study aims to fill theoretical gaps within this scholarship by providing an analysis of the Southeast Asian media sphere, focusing on Indonesia and Malaysia in a historical context—transnational media flow before 2010. The two neighboring nations of Indonesia and Malaysia have many things in common, from culture to language and religion. This study not only explores similarities in the reception and appropriation of transnational content in both countries but also investigates why, to some extent, each had a different attitude toward content pro- duced by the other. It also looks at how governments in these two nations control the flow of transnational media content. Focusing on broadcast media, the study finds that cross-border media flow between Indonesia and Malaysia was made pos- sible primarily in two ways: (1) illicit or unintended media exchange, and (2) legal and intended media exchange. Illicit media exchange was enabled through the use of satellite dishes and antennae near state borders, as well as piracy. Legal and intended media exchange was enabled through state collaboration and the purchase of media rights; both governments also utilized several bodies of laws to assist in controlling transnational media content. Based on our analysis, there is a path of transnational media exchange between these two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bab 2 Industri Dan Regulasi Penyiaran Di Indonesia
    BAB 2 INDUSTRI DAN REGULASI PENYIARAN DI INDONESIA 2.1. Lembaga Penyiaran di Indonesia Dalam kehidupan sehari-hari, istilah lembaga penyiaran seringkali dianggap sama artinya dengan istilah stasiun penyiaran. Menurut Peraturan Menkominfo No 43 Tahun 2009, yang ditetapkan 19 Oktober 2009, lembaga penyiaran adalah penyelenggara penyiaran, baik Lembaga Penyiaran Publik, Lembaga Penyiaran Swasta, Lembaga Penyiaran Komunitas, maupun Lembaga Penyiaran Berlangganan yang dalam melaksanakan tugas, fungsi dan tanggungjawabnya berpedoman pada peraturan perundangan yang berlaku. Jika ditafsirkan, lembaga penyiaran adalah salah satu elemen dalam dunia atau sistem penyiaran. Dengan demikian walau lembaga penyiaran bisa dilihat sebagai segala kegiatan yang berhubungan dengan pemancarluasan siaran saja, namun secara implisit ia merupakan keseluruhan yang utuh dari lembaga-lembaga penyiaran (sebagai lembaga yang memiliki para pendiri, tujuan pendiriannya/visi dan misi, pengelola, perlengkapan fisik), dengan kegiatan operasional dalam menjalankan tujuan-tujuan penyiaran, serta tatanan nilai, dan peraturan dengan perangkat-perangkat regulatornya. Sedangkan stasiun penyiaran adalah tempat di mana program acara diproduksi/diolah untuk dipancarluaskan melalui sarana pemancaran dan/atau sarana transmisi di darat, laut atau antariksa dengan menggunakan spektrum frekuensi radio melalui udara, kabel, dan/atau media lainnya untuk dapat diterima secara serentak dan bersamaan oleh masyarakat dengan perangkat penerima siaran. Sedangkan penyiaran adalah kegiatan pemancarluasan
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalized Leadership: Resilient Hegemonic Party Autocracy in Singapore
    Institutionalized Leadership: Resilient Hegemonic Party Autocracy in Singapore By Netina Tan PhD Candidate Political Science Department University of British Columbia Paper prepared for presentation at CPSA Conference, 28 May 2009 Ottawa, Ontario Work- in-progress, please do not cite without author’s permission. All comments welcomed, please contact author at [email protected] Abstract In the age of democracy, the resilience of Singapore’s hegemonic party autocracy is puzzling. The People’s Action Party (PAP) has defied the “third wave”, withstood economic crises and ruled uninterrupted for more than five decades. Will the PAP remain a deviant case and survive the passing of its founding leader, Lee Kuan Yew? Building on an emerging scholarship on electoral authoritarianism and the concept of institutionalization, this paper argues that the resilience of hegemonic party autocracy depends more on institutions than coercion, charisma or ideological commitment. Institutionalized parties in electoral autocracies have a greater chance of survival, just like those in electoral democracies. With an institutionalized leadership succession system to ensure self-renewal and elite cohesion, this paper contends that PAP will continue to rule Singapore in the post-Lee era. 2 “All parties must institutionalize to a certain extent in order to survive” Angelo Panebianco (1988, 54) Introduction In the age of democracy, the resilience of Singapore’s hegemonic party regime1 is puzzling (Haas 1999). A small island with less than 4.6 million population, Singapore is the wealthiest non-oil producing country in the world that is not a democracy.2 Despite its affluence and ideal socio- economic prerequisites for democracy, the country has been under the rule of one party, the People’s Action Party (PAP) for the last five decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Content
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Elites and economic policies in Indonesia and Nigeria, 1966-1998 Fuady, A.H. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Fuady, A. H. (2012). Elites and economic policies in Indonesia and Nigeria, 1966-1998. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:29 Sep 2021 Chapter 6 Elites and Industrialization Policy Industrialization has been regarded as a major factor contributing to divergent economic development in Asia and Africa. This has also been a feature of Indonesia–Nigeria comparisons since the 1980s. Since the mid- 1980s, the manufacturing sector has been an engine of growth in Indonesia. Contribution of the sector to the country‟s GDP increased significantly, from 8 percent in 1965 to 29 percent in 2003 (World Bank, 2007b).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded at 298.Pdf
    Singapore Academy of Law From the SelectedWorks of Jack Tsen-Ta LEE December, 2012 Shall the Twain Never Meet? Competing Narratives and Discourses of the Rule of Law in Singapore Jack Tsen-Ta Lee Available at: https://works.bepress.com/jacklee/37/ School of Law Singapore Management University 60 Stamford Road, #04-11, Singapore 178900 [email protected] y http://www.law.smu.edu.sg 3 October 2012 Shall the Twain Never Meet? Competing Narratives and Discourses of the Rule of Law in Singapore Jack Tsen-Ta Lee* * LLB (Hons) (Nat’l University of Singapore), LLM (UCL, Lond); PhD (B’ham); Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore), Solicitor (England & Wales); Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University. © 2012. This article was published as [2012] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 298– 330 and may be downloaded at http://law.nus.edu.sg/sjls/articles/SJLS-Dec-12- 298.pdf. It may also be obtained from the Singapore Management University Repository at http://works.bepress.com/jacklee/37/ and the Social Sciences Research Network at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2236053. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies [2012] 298–330 SHALL THE TWAIN NEVER MEET? COMPETING NARRATIVES AND DISCOURSES OF THE RULE OF LAW IN SINGAPORE Jack Tsen-Ta Lee∗ This article aims to assess the role played by the rule of law in discourse by critics of the Singapore Government’s policies and in the Government’s responses to such criticisms. It argues that in the past the two narratives clashed over conceptions of the rule of law, but there is now evidence of convergence of thinking as regards the need to protect human rights, though not necessarily as to how the balance between rights and other public interests should be struck.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Migration, Social Network, and Identity
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Migration, Social Network, and Identity: The Evolution of Chinese Community in East San Gabriel Valley, 1980-2010 A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Yu-Ju Hung August 2013 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Clifford Trafzer, Chairperson Dr. Larry Burgess Dr. Rebecca Monte Kugel Copyright by Yu-Ju Hung 2013 The Dissertation of Yu-Ju Hung is approved: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements This dissertation would hardly have possible without the help of many friends and people. I would like to express deepest gratitude to my advisor, Professor Clifford Trafzer, who gave me boundless patience and time for my doctoral studies. His guidance and instruction not only inspired me in the dissertation research but also influenced my interests in academic pursuits. I want to thank other committee members: Professor Larry Burgess and Professor Rebecca Monte Kugel. Both of them provided thoughtful comments and valuable ideas for my dissertation. I am also indebted to Tony Yang, for his painstaking editing and proofreading work during my final writing stage. My special thanks go to Professor Chin-Yu Chen, for her constant concern and insightful suggestions for my research. I am also grateful to all people who assisted me in the process of my fieldwork: Cary Chen, Joseph Chang, Norman Hsu, David Fong, Judy Haggerty Chen, Ivy Kuan, Chuching Wang, Charles Liu, Livingstone Liu, Scarlet Treu, Chien-kuo Shieh, Champion Tang, and Sam Lo. They both served as my interviewees and informants, providing me valuable first-hand materials and access to local Chinese community.
    [Show full text]
  • China, Cambodia, and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence: Principles and Foreign Policy
    China, Cambodia, and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence: Principles and Foreign Policy Sophie Diamant Richardson Old Chatham, New York Bachelor of Arts, Oberlin College, 1992 Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2001 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics University of Virginia May, 2005 !, 11 !K::;=::: .' P I / j ;/"'" G 2 © Copyright by Sophie Diamant Richardson All Rights Reserved May 2005 3 ABSTRACT Most international relations scholarship concentrates exclusively on cooperation or aggression and dismisses non-conforming behavior as anomalous. Consequently, Chinese foreign policy towards small states is deemed either irrelevant or deviant. Yet an inquiry into the full range of choices available to policymakers shows that a particular set of beliefs – the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence – determined options, thus demonstrating the validity of an alternative rationality that standard approaches cannot apprehend. In theoretical terms, a belief-based explanation suggests that international relations and individual states’ foreign policies are not necessarily determined by a uniformly offensive or defensive posture, and that states can pursue more peaceful security strategies than an “anarchic” system has previously allowed. “Security” is not the one-dimensional, militarized state of being most international relations theory implies. Rather, it is a highly subjective, experience-based construct, such that those with different experiences will pursue different means of trying to create their own security. By examining one detailed longitudinal case, which draws on extensive archival research in China, and three shorter cases, it is shown that Chinese foreign policy makers rarely pursued options outside the Five Principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary & Territory Briefing
    International Boundaries Research Unit BOUNDARY & TERRITORY BRIEFING Volume 2 Number 6 The Land Boundaries of Indochina: Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam Ronald Bruce St John Boundary and Territory Briefing Volume 2 Number 6 ISBN 1-897643-32-2 1998 The Land Boundaries of Indochina: Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam by Ronald Bruce St John Edited by Clive Schofield International Boundaries Research Unit Department of Geography University of Durham South Road Durham DH1 3LE UK Tel: UK + 44 (0) 191 334 1961 Fax: UK +44 (0) 191 334 1962 E-mail: [email protected] www: http://www-ibru.dur.ac.uk The Author Ronald Bruce St John is an independent scholar specialising in the political economy and foreign policy of developing states. He has worked as an advisor and researcher in Southeast Asia for almost 30 years and remains a regular visitor to Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. He holds a B.A. in political science from Knox College and an M.A. and Ph.D. in international relations from the Graduate School of International Studies, University of Denver. Dr St John has published widely on Asian issues, including recent articles in Asian Survey, Asian Affairs, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, Contemporary Southeast Asia, and Journal of the Siam Society. He is the author of two earlier Boundary and Territory Briefings, The Boundary Between Ecuador and Peru and The Bolivia-Chile-Peru Dispute in the Atacama Desert. Dr St John is currently completing a major study of economic reform and economic development in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. The opinions and comments contained herein are those of the author and are not necessarily to be construed as those of the International Boundaries Research Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese in Cambodia. William E
    CHINESE CAMBODIAN FROM WIKIPEDIA, THE FREE ENCYCLOPEDIA "The Khmer Rouge reduced the numbers of the sino-cambodian from 430,000 in 1975 to 215,000 in 1979" Chinese Cambodians are Cambodian citizens of Chinese descent. During the late 1960s and early 1970s, they were the largest ethnic group in Cambodia; there were an estimated 425,000. However, by 1984, there were only 61,400 Chinese Cambodians left. This has been attributed to a combination of warfare, Khmer Rouge and Vietnamese persecution, and emigration. In 1963, William Willmott, an expert on overseas Chinese communities, estimated that 90% of the Chinese in Cambodia were involved in commerce. Today, an estimated 60% are urban dwellers engaged mainly in commerce, with most of the rural population working as shopkeepers, processors of food products (such as rice, palm sugar, fruit, and fish), and moneylenders. Those in Kampot Province and parts of Kaoh Kong Province cultivate black pepper and fruit (especially rambutans, durians, and coconuts). Additionally, some rural Chinese Cambodians are engaged in salt water fishing. Most Chinese Cambodian moneylenders wield considerable economic power over the ethnic Khmer peasants through usury. Studies in the 1950s revealed that Chinese shopkeepers in Cambodia would sell to peasants on credit at interest rates of 10-20% a month. This might have been the reason why seventy-five percent of the peasants in Cambodia were in debt in 1952, according to the Australian Colonial Credit Office. There seemed to be little distinction between Chinese and Sino-Khmer (offspring of mixed Chinese and Khmer descent) in the moneylending and shopkeeping enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal and Political Party Reforms in Asia
    Government and Opposition (2020), 1–22 . doi:10.1017/gov.2020.26 ARTICLE Federal and Political Party Reforms in Asia: Is There a New Model of Federal Democracy Emerging in Ethnically Diverse Countries in Asia? https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Michael G. Breen* School of Social and Political Science, University of Melbourne, Australia *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (Received 7 May 2020; revised 15 September 2020; accepted 22 September 2020) Abstract How do ethnically divided countries create inclusive and stable democratic institutions? Why do some kinds of federalism fail while others evolve? Scholars looking for answers to these kinds of questions have tended to focus on the West. Yet there are important les- sons arising from the substantial democratic and federal reforms that have taken place in Asia over the last few decades. These reforms signal a new model of federal democracy in Asia, comprising multilevel ethnoterritorial federalism, mixed-majoritarianism and a party system that includes both ethnic and multi-ethnic parties. This model has emerged , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at as a response to ethnic conflict and secession risks and reflects the high diversity of clus- tered communities and cross-cutting cleavages. Despite its overarching majoritarianism, the federal model has led to highly fragmented party systems and coalition governments, with positive implications for democratic stability. Together, these features go some way towards blending otherwise conflicting consociational and centripetal paradigms. 14 Mar 2021 at 01:37:17 , on Keywords: federalism; political parties; electoral systems; Asia; ethnic politics; consociationalism How do ethnically divided countries balance demands for autonomy with objec- 194.193.48.186 tives of stability and national unity? Why do some kinds of federalism fail while others evolve? Scholars looking for answers to these kinds of questions have tended to focus on the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Minorities in the Post-Soviet Space: a Comparative Analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan
    Russian minorities in the Post-Soviet Space: a Comparative analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan By Zhyldyz Abaskanova Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts CEU eTD Collection Supervisor: Associate Professor Thomas Fetzer Word count: 13, 428 Budapest, Hungary 2016 i Abstract Under the Soviet Union, Russians were spread out over the entire territory of the USSR. Russians held high positions in the Soviet Union. However, after the disintegration of the USSR, Russians who lived outside of Russia acquired the new status of being a minority. The sudden collapse of the USSR raised many concerns and fears for Russians who lived outside of Russia, since successor states prioritized nation-building processes. This study examines the treatment of Russian memories in Uzbekistan and in Kyrgyzstan by using Rogers Brubaker’s framework of triadic nexus. The research covers the relations between national minority with nationalizing state and relation of national minority with external national homelands. Primarily, this thesis considers Uzbekistan’s and Kyrgyzstan’s treatment of Russians minorities on the basis of language and access to politics. There are examined nationalizing policies of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan and Russian minorities’ opinion toward such policies. In addition, it provides an analysis of Russian Federation policies on supporting its compatriots in foreign countries and Russian minorities’ assessment of Russia as a state that support and pursue their interest. Based on qualitative and quantitative data, I claim that the treatments of Russians in both states are different in terms of language policies and politics.
    [Show full text]