DOCSLIB.ORG

Airport Air Quality Manual ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airport Air Quality Manual ______ Doc 9889 Airport Air Quality Manual ________________________________ Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority First Edition — 2011 International Civil Aviation Organization CAEP-SG/20153-WP/34 Appendix G APPENDIX G Published in separate English, Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish editions by the INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION 999 University Street, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 5H7 For ordering information and for a complete listing of sales agents and booksellers, please go to the ICAO website at www.icao.int Doc 9889, Airport Air Quality Manual Order Number: 9889 ISBN 978-92-9231-862-8 © ICAO 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing from the International Civil Aviation Organization. AMENDMENTS Amendments are announced in the supplements to the Catalogue of ICAO Publications; the Catalogue and its supplements are available on the ICAO website at www.icao.int. The space below is provided to keep a record of such amendments. RECORD OF AMENDMENTS AND CORRIGENDA AMENDMENTS CORRIGENDA No. Date Entered by No. Date Entered by TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword .............................................................................................................................................. (ix) Glossary .............................................................................................................................................. (xi) Acronyms and abbreviations .............................................................................................................. (xiii) ICAO publications ............................................................................................................................... (xvii) Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 The Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection ....................................................... 1-2 1.3 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Air quality assessment .......................................................................................................... 1- Chapter 2. Regulatory framework and drivers .............................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Drivers for action .................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3 Local air quality regulations and pollutant regulation .......................................................... 2-3 2.4 Aircraft engine and road vehicle emissions standards and regulations ................................ 2-6 2.5 Changing regulations and technology targets ....................................................................... 2-8 2.6 Regulatory responses ............................................................................................................ 2-8 Chapter 3. Emissions inventory ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Emissions inventory parameters ........................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Emissions species ................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.4 Airport-related emissions sources ......................................................................................... 3-4 3.5 Local and regional emissions ................................................................................................ 3-5 3.6 Quality assurance .................................................................................................................. 3-5 3.7 Forecasting ............................................................................................................................ 3-6 Appendix 1. Methodologies for the estimation of aircraft emissions ............................................ 3-A1-1 Appendix 2. Aircraft handling emissions ........................................................................................ 3-A2-1 Appendix 3. Infrastructure-related and stationary sources of emissions .................................... 3-A3-1 Appendix 4. Vehicle traffic emissions .............................................................................................. 3-A4-1 Chapter 4. Temporal and spatial distribution of emissions .......................................................... 4-1 4.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 General emissions distribution considerations ..................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Spatial distribution ................................................................................................................ 4-5 4.4 Temporal distribution ........................................................................................................... 4-6 4.5 Use of computer models ....................................................................................................... 4-6 4.6 Data formatting and reporting .............................................................................................. 4-7 Chapter 5. Dispersion modelling ..................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 External requirements and drivers ........................................................................................ 5-1 5.3 General dispersion concepts ................................................................................................. 5-2 5.4 Required model inputs .......................................................................................................... 5-5 5.5 Dispersion calculation .......................................................................................................... 5-8 5.6 Model outputs ....................................................................................................................... 5-11 5.7 Modelling application and interpretation of results .............................................................. 5-12 Appendix 1. Overview of dispersion modelling methodologies ..................................................... 5-A1-1 Appendix 2. Commonly used dispersion models in the vicinity of airports ................................. 5-A2-1 Appendix 3. Climatological information sources ........................................................................... 5-A3-1 Chapter 6. Ambient air quality measurements for airports ......................................................... 6-1 6.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Requirements and drivers for air quality measurements ....................................................... 6-1 6.3 Measurement plan ................................................................................................................. 6-2 6.4 Analysis of data .................................................................................................................... 6-6 6.5 Measurement quality assurance/quality control ................................................................... 6-9 Appendix 1. Description of selected measurement methods ......................................................... 6-A1-1 Appendix 2. Examples of measurement methods ........................................................................... 6-A2-1 Appendix 3. References (selection) .................................................................................................. 6-A3-1 Chapter 7. Mitigation options .......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Mitigation planning methodology ........................................................................................ 7-1 7.3 Mitigation options ................................................................................................................. 7-3 Appendix to Chapter 7. References ................................................................................................. 7-A1-1 Chapter 8. Interrelationships associated with methods for mitigating environmental impacts 8-1 8.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 Recommendations for evaluating interdependencies...........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Factors Responsible for The
    CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE - -v - - - IN THE AUBURN CITY WATER SUPPLY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION/AUBURN UNIVERSITY R. DENNIS ROUSE, DIRECTOR AUBURN, ALABAMA BULLETIN 490 JULY 1977 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........ .. .. ............... 3 Background on Odors of Biological Origin in Water .......................... 3 Odor in the Auburn Water ........................... 5 PROCEDURES ............................ 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........... ...... .......... 7 Biological Factors................................ 7 Chemical Factors ............................... 22 Environmental Factors Related to the Growth and Production of Odorous Substances by Actinomycetes ....... 24 Correlation of Rainfall, Temperature, and Threshold Odor Number (TON) ................... 39 SUMMARY ... ... ...................... ........... 41 REFERENCES ................... ....... ... .......... 45 FIRST PRINTING 3M, JULY 1977 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank the Auburn Water Board for the financial support of this project, the Auburn Water Treatment Plant for supplying TON values, Dr. John Lawrence for use of the carbon analyzer, and Sandy Williams, Frank Seesock, and Susan Brownlee for technical assistance. Information contained herein is available to all without regard to race, color, or nationalorigin. CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, and ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS RESPONSIBLE for the EARTHY ODOR in the AUBURN CITY WATER SUPPLY J. D. WEETE, W. T. BLEVINS, G. R.WILT, and D. DURHAM' INTRODUCTION Background On Odors Of Biological Origin in Water HE OCCURRENCE of objectionable odors in water used for drinking and commercial purposes is well documented in certain regions of the United States (1, 4, 12, 15) and various other parts of the world. (1, 8, 9, 11). Odors in sur- face waters may originate from industrial and municipal sewage effluents or from biological activities of algae or heterotrophic microorganisms. Odors of biological origin may be due to decomposition of organisms or to the produc- tion of microbial metabolites.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary: Facing the Challenge of Gene-Environment Interaction: the Two-By-Four Table and Beyond
    American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 10 Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health Printed in U.S.A. All rights reserved The Challenge of Gene-Environment Interaction Botto and Khoury PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY Commentary: Facing the Challenge of Gene-Environment Interaction: The Two-by-Four Table and Beyond Lorenzo D. Botto1 and Muin J. Khoury2 As a result of the Human Genome Project, epidemiologists can study thousands of genes and their interaction with the environment. The challenge is how to best present and analyze such studies of multiple genetic and environmental factors. The authors suggest emphasizing the fundamental core of gene-environment interaction—the separate assessment of the effects of individual and joint risk factors. In the simple analysis of one genotype and an exposure (both dichotomous), such study can be summarized in a two-by-four table. The advantages of such a table for data presentation and analysis are many: The table displays the data efficiently and highlights sample size issues; it allows for evaluation of the independent and joint roles of genotype and exposure on disease risk; and it emphasizes effect estimation over model testing. Researchers can easily estimate relative risks and attributable fractions and test different models of interaction. The two-by-four table is a useful tool for presenting, analyzing, and synthesizing data on gene-environment interaction. To highlight the role of gene-environment interaction in disease causation, the authors propose that the two-by-four table is the fundamental unit of epidemiologic analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:1016–20.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Factors Affecting the Composition and Diversity of The
    Imai et al. Journal of Ecology and Environment (2017) 41:8 Journal of Ecology DOI 10.1186/s41610-017-0027-2 and Environment RESEARCH Open Access Environmental factors affecting the composition and diversity of the avian community in igune, a traditional agricultural landscape in northern Japan Haruka Imai1*, Tohru Nakashizuka1,2 and Michio Oguro1,3 Abstract Background: “Igune,” a traditional agricultural landscape in the Tohoku region of Japan, is characterized by small-scale artificial woodlots surrounding a farmer’s house that are interspersed with paddy fields. During the rapid economic growth of Japan over recent decades, some igune woodlots have been abandoned or logged. Biodiversity conservation is an important issue worldwide, and traditional agricultural landscapes are of particular interest. To elucidate the role of igune landscapes in conserving biodiversity, we examined the effects of environmental factors on avian communities. Results: The study was conducted in the suburban areas of Oshu and Hanamaki cities, Iwate Prefecture, Japan, at eight sites that varied in the density and area of igune woodlots within the landscape. Bird surveys were conducted from the middle to late breeding season, and several environmental factors of the igune landscape were also measured. The results of canonical correspondence analysis indicated that the characteristics of avian communities were mainly determined by the total forested area in the landscape. Increased total forested area and shrubs layer of igune woodlots did not cause a reduction in number of bird species of any habitat and foraging types, while increased both in species number and abundance of insectivores and forest species. The number of raptor species increased in igune sites without shrubs.
    [Show full text]
  • How Much Global Ill Health Is Attributable to Environmental Factors?
    ORIGINAL ARTICLES How Much Global Ill Health Is Attributable to Environmental Factors? Kirk R. Smith,1 Carlos F. Corvalán2, and Tord Kjellström3 Over the years, estimates have been made of the portions of attributed to environmental risk factors. Children under 5 human mortality and morbidity that can be attributed to years of age seem to bear the largest environmental burden, environmental factors. Frustratingly, however, even for a and the portion of disease due to environmental risks seems single category of disease such as cancer, these estimates to decrease with economic development. A summary of have often varied widely. Here we attempt to explain why these estimates first appeared in the 1997 report, "Health such efforts have come to such different results in the past and Environment in Sustainable Development," which was and to provide guidance for doing such estimates more the World Health Organization's contribution to the 5-year consistently in the future to avoid the most important pitfalls. anniversary of the Rio Earth Summit. A full explanation of We do so by carefully defining what we mean by the terms how these estimates were made is first presented here. We "environmental," "ill health," and "attributable." Finally, end with a call for a program of "strategic epidemiology," based on these recommendations, we attempt our own which would be designed to fill important gaps in the estimate, appropriately qualified according to the many understanding of major environmental health risks in remaining uncertainties. Our estimate is that 25-33% of the important population groups worldwide. (Epidemiology global burden of disease can be 1999;10:573-584) Keywords: environmental exposures, morbidity, mortality, children, environmental health risks, populations, global factors, public health.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Classifications Project – Determinants of Health
    Public Health Classifications Project – Determinants of Health Phase Two: Final Report Acknowledgements We acknowledge the National Public Health Partnership for leading the first phase of work on public health classification; the New South Wales Department of Health and the Public Health Information Development Unit, the University of Adelaide for sponsoring this Project; colleagues from both for their support of the Project Officer; the Sax Institute for providing meeting premises and equipment; and the National Centre for Classification in Health for access to ICD-10, the 11th coding conference and opportunities to meet and discuss issues with ICD coders. NSW DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 73 Miller Street NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2060 Tel. (02) 9391 9000 Fax. (02) 9391 9101 TTY. (02) 9391 9900 www.health.nsw.gov.au Report prepared for the New South Wales Department of Health Report prepared by Su Gruszin, the Project Officer; Louisa Jorm, the Chair of the Project Working Group; and Working Group members: Tim Churches, Richard Madden, Sarah Thackway, and Ros Madden. This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part for study training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source. It may not be reproduced for commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those indicated above requires written permission from the NSW Department of Health. © NSW Department of Health 2010 SHPN (CER) 100195 ISBN 978-1-74187-461-7 Further copies of this document can be downloaded from the NSW Health website www.health.nsw.gov.au December 2010 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................. 3 Section 1: Introduction .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bioactive Nutrients and Nutrigenomics in Age-Related Diseases
    molecules Review Bioactive Nutrients and Nutrigenomics in Age-Related Diseases Tania Rescigno 1, Luigina Micolucci 2,3, Mario F. Tecce 1 and Anna Capasso 1,* 1 Department of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, Fisciano 84084, Italy; [email protected] (T.R.); [email protected] (M.F.T.) 2 Computational Pathology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60120, Italy; [email protected] 3 Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60120, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-089-989744 Academic Editor: Philippe Bulet Received: 18 November 2016; Accepted: 3 January 2017; Published: 8 January 2017 Abstract: The increased life expectancy and the expansion of the elderly population are stimulating research into aging. Aging may be viewed as a multifactorial process that results from the interaction of genetic and environmental factors, which include lifestyle. Human molecular processes are influenced by physiological pathways as well as exogenous factors, which include the diet. Dietary components have substantive effects on metabolic health; for instance, bioactive molecules capable of selectively modulating specific metabolic pathways affect the development/progression of cardiovascular and neoplastic disease. As bioactive nutrients are increasingly identified, their clinical and molecular chemopreventive effects are being characterized and systematic analyses encompassing the “omics” technologies (transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) are being conducted to explore their action. The evolving field of molecular pathological epidemiology has unique strength to investigate the effects of dietary and lifestyle exposure on clinical outcomes. The mounting body of knowledge regarding diet-related health status and disease risk is expected to lead in the near future to the development of improved diagnostic procedures and therapeutic strategies targeting processes relevant to nutrition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exposome & Precision Medicine
    Institute for Exposomic Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai The Exposome & Precision Medicine “Everything that rises must converge” Flannery O’Connor Robert O. Wright MD MPH Ethel H Wise Professor and Chairman Department of Environmental Medicine Director: Mount Sinai Institute for Exposomics Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai What is Precision Medicine? • NRC Definition – Tailoring of medical treatment to the characteristics of each patient. • classify individuals into subpopulations that differ in their susceptibility to a disease, prognosis, or response to a specific treatment. • Interventions are concentrated on those who benefit, sparing expense and side effects for those who will not. In essence, it means understanding the patient’s individual background - that influences disease severity, progression and response to treatment Operates in a setting where the Probability of illness = 1 (i.e. prevention no longer matters) The promise of precision medicine • Pharmacogenomics – Increased drug efficacy & decreased toxicity – Decreased exposure to ineffective drugs – Target therapy to the most effective drugs – Targeting of behavioral modifications based on individual risk factors • Improved counseling and decision making • Improved patient outcomes and satisfaction • Improved tolerance of therapy improve adherence But we know that genetics is only 1 piece of a much bigger puzzle Genes Behavior Nutrition Infections Chemicals Physical environment Culture/society Stress Introduction to the special issue in Science was entitled: “It's Not Just the Genes” Vol 296, 2002 Paula Kiberstis, Leslie Roberts For many programs in Precision Medicine, there is no mention of environment Complex Disease Research “So, how did we get here?” -David Byrne ADHD, Obesity, Asthma, COPD, Parkinson’s, Cancer etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Environmental Factors As Quality Determinants in Medicinal Plants ⁎ B
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com South African Journal of Botany 82 (2012) 11–20 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Review Quality from the field: The impact of environmental factors as quality determinants in medicinal plants ⁎ B. Ncube, J.F. Finnie, J. Van Staden Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa Available online 5 September 2012 Abstract Plants have been used extensively in both pharmaceutical and food industries, with consumers showing increasing interests in these products. Phytomedicines exploit a pool of biogenic resources produced by plants. However, the quality and quantity of these chemical metabolites in plants are influenced by a multitude of factors, chief among them, environmental. This review provides an overview of plant-produced chemical compounds with medicinal properties and how their production is affected by different environmental factors. An insight into how these factors can be manipulated within the plants' growing environments as a way of ensuring quality is also discussed. © 2012 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Environment; Phytomedicine; Quality; Secondary metabolite; Stress factors Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................. 11 2. Plant secondary metabolism ...................................................... 12 3. Environmental factors - a force behind secondary metabolism? ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Health Outcomes Across the Least, Average and Healthiest States in America
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons School of Public Service Theses & Dissertations School of Public Service Summer 2017 Factors Influencing Health Outcomes Across the Least, Average and Healthiest States in America Somayeh Hooshmand Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/publicservice_etds Part of the Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Hooshmand, Somayeh. "Factors Influencing Health Outcomes Across the Least, Average and Healthiest States in America" (2017). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, School of Public Service, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/sqdq-xm77 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/publicservice_etds/7 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Public Service at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Public Service Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTORS INFLUENCING HEALTH OUTCOMES ACROSS THE LEAST, AVERAGE AND HEALTHIEST STATES IN AMERICA by Somayeh Hooshmand B.A. May 2005, Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran Ph.D. September 2014, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2017 Approved by: Dr. John Morris (Director) Dr. Mohammad Najand (Member) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Behavioral Risk Factors and Social-Environmental Factors on Non-Communicable Diseases in South Korea: a National Survey Approach
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Effects of Behavioral Risk Factors and Social-Environmental Factors on Non-Communicable Diseases in South Korea: A National Survey Approach Nam Jeong Jeong 1, Eunil Park 1,* and Angel P. del Pobil 1,2,* 1 Department of Interaction Science, College of Computing, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea; [email protected] 2 Robotic Intelligence Laboratory, Engineering and Computer Science Deparment, University Jaume-I, 12071 Castellon, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.P.); [email protected] (A.P.d.P.); Tel.: +82-2-740-1864 (E.P.); +34-964-72.82.93/94 (A.P.d.P.) Abstract: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are one of the major health threats in the world. Thus, identifying the factors that influence NCDs is crucial to monitor and manage diseases. This study investigates the effects of social-environmental and behavioral risk factors on NCDs as well as the effects of social-environmental factors on behavioral risk factors using an integrated research model. This study used a dataset from the 2017 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. After filtering incomplete responses, 5462 valid responses remained. Items including one’s social-environmental factors (household income, education level, and region), behavioral factors (alcohol use, tobacco use, and physical activity), and NCDs histories were used for analyses. To develop a comprehensive index of each factor that allows comparison between different concepts, the researchers assigned scores to indicators of the factors and calculated a ratio of the scores. A series of path analyses were conducted to determine the extent of relationships among NCDs and risk factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene–Environment Interactions in Molecular Psychiatry
    Molecular Psychiatry (2002) 7, 123–124 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1359-4184/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/mp EDITORIAL Gene–environment interactions in Molecular Psychiatry Molecular Psychiatry (2002) 7, 123–124. DOI: 10.1038/ concentrations of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5- sj/mp/4001066 HIAA), where monkeys reared normally by their mothers were not. Specifically, peer-raised monkeys Individuals experiencing the same catastrophe or the with two copies of the long variant of the serotonin same loss can react very differently: some develop psy- transporter regulatory region (l/l), which was shown to chiatric symptoms that evolve to full blown psychiatric be associated with higher transcriptional activity, had disorders such as major depression or post-traumatic higher levels of CSF 5-HIAA than those with one copy stress disorder, while others stay symptom-free. Such of the long variant and one copy of the short one (l/s). disparate responses might be due to variations in gen- Those differences in CSF 5-HIAA levels were not seen etic substrates. Likewise, no single genetic variation in mother-reared monkeys. These data illustrate how will always cause the same degree of psychiatric symp- gene–environment interactions cause a specific bio- toms. Our field, which is now so focused on the identi- chemical phenotype. fication of genetic substrates, will eventually move to The genome is incredibly complex and genes for psy- the understanding of penetrance, which is likely to be chiatric disorders remain elusive. The umbrella of highly variable in psychiatry. Penetrance can be affec- environmental contributions encompasses a wide ted by the effects of other genes as well as by the range of elements, including but not restricted to cli- environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Efactor October 2009
    October 2009 NIEHS Spotlight Science Notebook Council Meeting Highlights NIEHS Director Gives Mission Accomplishments Distinguished Lecture Throughout the September 15–16 NIEHS and National Toxicology meeting of the National Advisory Program (NTP) Director Linda Environmental Health Sciences Birnbaum, Ph.D., D.A.B.T., A.T.S., Council (NAEHSC) at NIEHS, the presented the first seminar of the discussions were upbeat. ...read more 2009 – 2010 NIEHS Distinguished Lecture Series on September 8 titled “Halogenated Flame Retardants: Does the Benefit Justify the Risk?” ...read more Fellows Recognized at Regional Showcase in Cincinnati NIEHS Microarray Group The University of Cincinnati (UC) Hosts Genomics Day Center for Environmental Genetics (CEG) joined with other NIEHS- NIEHS Genomics Day, held on supported training programs, Centers September 1, offered scientists at and Superfund Research Programs to celebrate the first NIEHS and visitors an afternoon of Environmental Health Sciences Regional Showcase of talks by investigators and trainees, Fellows on September 18 at UC. ...read more a poster session, and an opportunity to learn more about the NIEHS Microarray Laboratory. ...read more 2009 ONES Awardees Named Genome-Wide Association NIEHS announced the selection of six early-stage tenure-track Study Focuses on Asthma investigators as 2009 Outstanding in Children New Environmental Scientist (ONES) A new genome-wide association awardees. ....read more study (GWAS) published August 28 in PLoS Genetics identified the chromosome 9q21.31 region
    [Show full text]