Chemical Yields from Low-Temperature Pyrolysis of CCA-Treated Wood
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
United States Department of Agriculture Chemical Yields Forest Service from Low-Temperature Forest Products Laboratory Pyrolysis of CCA-Treated Research Paper Wood FPL–RP–652 Qirong Fu Dimitris S. Argyropolous Lucian A. Lucia David C. Tilotta Stan T. Lebow Abstract Acknowledgment Low-temperature pyrolysis offers a feasible option for This project was supported by a grant from the Advanced wood-waste management and the recovery of a variety of Housing Research Center. useful chemicals. The effect of chromated copper arsenate (CCA) wood preservative on the yield and composition of Contents various pyrolysis products was investigated in the present Page research. A novel quantitative 31P nuclear magnetic reso- nance (NMR) spectroscopy methodology has been devel- Introduction ..........................................................................1 oped to quantify levoglucosan and levoglucosenone from Management Options for Reuse .......................................1 the pyrolysate of CCA-treated and untreated wood. The CCA treatment of wood had a notable effect on the charac- Low-Temperature Pyrolysis .............................................2 teristics of the carbohydrate-derived degradation products Experimental ........................................................................2 of tar. In particular, yields of the important pharmaceutical precursors levoglucosan and levoglucosenone were elevated Materials ..........................................................................2 by 3 and 4.5 times, respectively, when compared with those Pyrolysis Apparatus .........................................................3 from untreated wood. Phosphoric acid has proven to be an efficient catalyst to favor levoglucosenone formation. The Gas Chromatography Analysis ........................................3 pyrolysis of CCA-treated wood in the presence of phos- 31P NMR Analysis of Tar .................................................3 phoric acid gave rise to high yields of levoglucosenone, demonstrating the potential for a new pathway in the ratio- Metal Analysis .................................................................3 nal use of CCA-treated wood waste. Pretreatment of wood Pyrolysis of Microcrystalline Cellulose ...........................3 with metal compounds has demonstrated that K2Cr2O7 and CuSO4 salts promote the formation of levoglucosan. The Impregnation Studies with Phosphoric Acid ....................3 CrO3 treatment was found to favor the formation of levog- lucosenone. A kinetic study of the pyrolysis of CCA-treated Materials for the Metal Salt Study ...................................3 wood by thermogravimetric analysis has shown that CCA Pretreatment of Wood with Metal Compounds ................4 components have a significant influence on the thermal de- Gravimetric Analysis .......................................................4 composition behavior of CCA-treated wood and accelerate the weight loss of wood and the oxidation of the char. Results and Discussion ........................................................4 Keywords: CCA, treated wood, disposal, low-temperature 1. Quantification of Tar Products from pyrolysis, tar, levoglucosenone Pyrolysis of CCA-Treated Wood and Untreated Wood ...........................................................4 January 2009 2. Pyrolysis of CCA-Treated Wood in the Presence of Phosphoric Acid .......................................7 Fu, Qirong; Argyropolous, Dimitris S.; Lucia, Lucian A.; Tilotta, David C.; Lebow, Stan T. 2009. Chemical yields from low-temperature pyrolysis 3. Understanding Pyrolysis of Wood of CCA-treated wood. Research Paper FPL-RP-652. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. Pretreated with Metal Compounds ...............................8 18 p. 4. Use of TGA to Follow the Thermal A limited number of free copies of this publication are available to the public from the Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Decomposition of CCA-Treated Wood ......................12 Madison, WI 53726–2398. This publication is also available online at www.fpl.fs.fed.us. Laboratory publications are sent to hundreds of libraries Conclusions ........................................................................14 in the United States and elsewhere. The Forest Products Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the References ..........................................................................15 University of Wisconsin. The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) of any product or service. The USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orienta- tion, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program informa- tion (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimi- nation, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250–9410, or call (800) 795–3272 (voice) or (202) 720–6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Chemical Yields from Low-Temperature Pyrolysis of CCA-Treated Wood Qirong Fu, Graduate Student Dimitris S. Argyropolous, Professor Lucian A. Lucia, Associate Professor David C. Tilotta, Associate Professor Department of Wood and Paper Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina Stan T. Lebow, Research Forest Products Technologist U.S. Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin Introduction metals loss compared with combustion. The recombination and agglomeration of metals in the residue char allows the Chromated copper arsenate (CCA) preservatives, introduced use of dry separation (pneumatic centrifugal separation) to in the 1930s, have been the main chemical formulation used recover the metals, which makes the metal recycling process for pressure-treated wood. The most commonly used CCA more feasible. formulation, CCA Type C, has an actives ratio of 47.5% The existing and emerging technologies for managing CCA- CrO3, 18.5% CuO, and 34.0% As2O5 (AWPA 2007). Each of the components of CCA preservative serves a specific treated wood waste include recycling and recovery, chemi- purpose: copper is an effective fungicide and arsenic is an cal extraction, bioremediation, electrodialytic remediation, effective insecticide, whereas chromium serves to prevent and thermal destruction (Helsen and others 2005). Many corrosion and bind the chemical preservative to the wood additional technological options to manage waste of CCA- (Lebow 2006). As recently as 2001, CCA was used in about treated wood are summarized below, all of which have their 98% of the pressure-treated wood produced for residential limitations and problems. uses. Management Options for Reuse Prior to 2004, CCA-treated wood was widely used for many With the management option of reusing CCA-treated wood, outdoor applications, including utility poles, decks, fence the barriers are that wood waste is bulky and inefficient to posts, boat docks, and wooden playgrounds. However, an transport and contaminated sawdust may be generated. This agreement between CCA manufacturers and the U.S. Envi- option could be good for industrial products but it is of lim- ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) has largely limited the ited potential for residential treated products. current uses of CCA-treated wood to non-residential appli- Refining CCA-Treated Wood for Recycling cations (Lebow 2004). The need for strategies for disposing of residual CCA-treated wood remains, however, because Wood-Based Composites industry experts estimate that 75 billion board feet of CCA- Presently the market is not in favor of using CCA-treated treated boards are in current use nationwide (EPA 2003). wood in conventional wood composite manufacturing. Efficient recycling of decommissioned CCA-treated wood We also have questions about safety for workers and the remains a challenging problem in the United States. environment. Environmentally friendly recovery or disposal technologies, yyWe need to address the issue of using metal-containing or both, need to be developed for the large amounts of future and contaminated wood and the loss of ownership of CCA-treated lumber waste. Although CCA-treated wood treated wood. (The product should be identified as one can currently be placed in approved landfills in most regions containing treated wood.) of the United States, landfill disposal does not produce any yyLandfill disposal is only deferred, not avoided. benefit from either the wood fiber or preservative elements. yyCCA tends to interfere with adhesives. Burning CCA-treated wood for energy production is one possible option, but this option faces challenges because it Biodegradation by Fungi generates toxic gases (Marutzky 1990, Wilkins and Mur- With our current technology, biodegradation by fungi as an ray 1980, Dobbs and others 1978). Conventional pyrolysis option for refining CCA-treated wood for recycling is not systems (fixed bed, batch, or