The School of Ammonius, Son of Hermias, on Knowledge of the Divine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ELIAS TEMPELIS THE SCHOOL OF AMMONIUS, SON OF HERMIAS, ON KNOWLEDGE OF THE DIVINE ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΦΙΛΟΛΟΓΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΛΛΟΓΟΥ ΠΑΡΝΑΣΣΟΣ ΑΘΗΝΑΙ 1998 THE SCHOOL OF AMMONIUS, SON OF HERMIAS, ON KNOWLEDGE OF THE DIVINE ELIAS TEMPELIS THE SCHOOL OF AMMONIUS, SON OF HERMIAS, ON KNOWLEDGE OF THE DIVINE ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΦΙΛΟΛΟΓΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΛΛΟΓΟΥ ΠΑΡΝΑΣΣΟΣ ΑΘΗΝΑΙ 1998 ISBN 9608521254 1998 © Ηλίας Τεμπέλης, 'Ογδόη οδός 3,152 36 Π. Πεντέλη ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΦΙΛΟΛΟΓΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΛΛΟΓΟΥ ΠΑΡΝΑΣΣΟΣ Πλατεία Αγ. Γεωργίου Καρύτση 8,105 61 'Αθήναι Υπεύθυνος Τυπογραφείου: ΕΥΑΓΓ. ΜΠΟΥΛΟΥΚΟΣ Όδός Μίλωνος 26,117 45 Αθήναι Τηλ.: 93.45.204 - Fax: 93.17.188 To my wife Christina PREFACE This book is a slightly revised version of my Ph.D. thesis, on which I ' began work in 1990 and which I defended at the University of London in 1994. My study undertakes a reconstruction and critical assessment of the theory of the Neoplatonic school of Ammonius, son of Hermias, on the presuppositions of the acquisition of knowledge of the divine and also on the contents and the purpose of this knowledge. The metaphysical position of the human soul between the intelligible and the sensible worlds allows it to know the intelligible world and the divine, in particular, provided that the cognitive reason-principles in the human intellect are activated. The purpose of such knowledge is the as• similation to the divine and is achieved by means of a personal struggle with the help of theoretical and practical philosophy. The school of Am• monius compared its own philosophical attempt at knowledge of the di• vine to previous similar methods. In this respect what is shown are the reasons for the inadequacy or efficiency of methods followed by previous philosophers. As expected, a method was found inadequate if it deviated from the Neoplatonic one. Since the One is unknowable, the members of this school believed that man can know to some extent the Demiurge, who belongs to the second level of the intelligible world. The members of the school had different views on affirmative and negative theology. The intelligible ante rem uni• versal, the most fundamental of which is Substance, constitute the cogni• tive and creative reason-principles of the demiurgic Intellect. The eternal activation of these principles result in the Demiurge's omniscience and the creation of the world, which is coeternal with the Demiurge. The Demi• urge is incorporeal and exercises providence for what He has created, but He is not omnipotent. The theory of the school of Ammonius on knowledge of the divine is shown to be broadly consistent, though not necessarily convincing. The factor which determined the choice of the subject-matter is the scant scholarship devoted to it and, more generally, to the final expres• sions of late antiquity. Much of the lack of interest may be due to the — 8 — aversion caused by the untranslated volumes of this school's Greek com• mentaries. It is hoped that more recent scholarship may contribute to a drastic change of the persistent preconception about the decline and fall of classical thought by the time of Ammonius and his students. Thanks are due to many people who helped me in my work on the school of Ammonius. In particular I should like to express my deepest gratitude to my thesis advisor Dr Robert Heinaman, of the Department of Philosophy, University College London. I thank him for his comments as well as his patience and kindness. To Professor Koenraad Verrycken, Philip Pilkington and Dr Margaret Gullan - Whur goes credit for their appreciative comments. My examiners, Dr Henri - Dominique Saffrey and Dr Anne Sheppard, have been most careful critics of my work and encouraged me to publish it. For the knowledge of ancient philosophy I shall be always grateful to my teachers at the University of Athens. I wish to mention specifically Professor Grigorios Kostaras, to whom I am indebted in very many ways, but most especially for having taught me to think for myself. I also feel fortunate to have consulted Professors Gerard J.P. O'Daly and Robert Sharpies, of the Department of Greek and Latin, University College London, thus having benefited from their knowledge of Greek Philosophy. During my postgraduate studies I had the privilege to attend the seminars in ancient philosophy organized by Professor Richard So- rabji at the Institute of Classical Studies. My studies in England would not have been possible without a three- and-a-half year scholarship which was awarded to me by the Greek State Scholarships Foundation (IKY). The very least I can do on this occasion is to thank the Administrative Board of the Foundation. It is my pleasure to thank the President of the Parnassos Literary Society Professor Nikolaos Livadaras for accepting this book in the series of editions of the Parnassos Literary Society. To my father John and my late mother Eriphyle Tempelis I owe more than I can say for their warm encouragement over the years. I should also like to mention my brother George for the proof-checking of my work. Finally, I must turn in gratitude to my wife Christina - Panagiota Mano- lea for her personal and scientific support. BIBLIOGRAPHY a. Primary Sources Agathon, Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, ed. Β. Snell, vol. 1, Gòttingen Ruprecht 1971, 161168. Alcinous, Epitome doctrinae Platonicae, ed. J. Whittaker, Paris 1990. —, Introducilo in Platonem, ed. Κ.F. Hermann, Platonis dialogi secundum Thrasylli tetra logias dispositi, vol. 6, Leipzig 1853, 147151. Alexander, In Aristotelis Metaphysica, ed. M. Hayduck, Commentarla in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. I, Berlin 1891. —, In Aristotelis Meteorologicorum libros, ed. M. Hayduck, op. cit., vol. III.2, Berlin 1890. —, Quaestiones, ed. I. Bruns, op. cit., vol. suppl. II.2, Berlin 1892, 1163. —, De fato, ed. I. Bruns, ibid., 164212. —, De mixtione, ed. I. Bruns, ibid., 213238. AlFarabi, Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle's De Interpretatione, Translated with an introduction and Notes by F. W. Zimmermann, The British Academy, Clas sical and Medieval Logic Texts, London 1981. —, On the Perfect State {Abu Nasr alFarabis. Marabi ara ahi al madina alfadila), A revised text with introduction, translation and commentary by R. Walzer, Oxford 1985. Ammonius, In Porphyrii Isagogen sive quinque voces, ed. A. Busse, Commentarla in Ari stotelem Graeca, vol. IV.3, Berlin 1891. —, In Aristotelis Categorias, ed. A. Busse, op. cit., vol. IV.4, Berlin 1895. —, In Aristotelis de Interpretatione, ed. A. Busse, op. cit., vol. IV.5, Berlin 1897. —, In librum peri hermeneias Aristotelis recordatio, éd. G. Verbeke, Commentaire sur le Peri Hermeneias d'Aristote, Traduction de G. de Moerbeke, Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum, vol. II, Paris Louvain 1961. —, In Aristotelis Analyticorum Priorum i, éd. M. Wallies, Commentarla in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. IV.6, Berlin 1899. Anonymous, Prolegomena Philosophiae Platonicae, ed. L.G. Westerink, Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon, Paris 1990. Anonymous, In Aristotelis de Interpretatione, éd. L. Tarân, Anonymous Commentary on Aristotle's De Interpretatione (Codex Parisinus Graecus 2064), Beitràge zur klassi schen Philologie, 95, Meisenheim am Gian 1978, 1120. Apuleius, De Platone et eius dogmate, ed. J. Beaujeu, Paris 1973, 49107. Aristotle, Analytica priora et posteriora, ed. W.D. Ross, Oxford 1964 (repr. 1968). —, De Anima, éd. W.D. Ross, Oxford 1961 (repr. 1967). —, De caelo, éd. P. Moraux, Aristote. Du ciel, Paris 1965. —, Categoriae, éd. L. Minio Paluello, Aristotelis categoriae et liber de interpretatione, Oxford 1949 (repr. 1966), 345. —, De generatione et corruptione, ed. C. Mugler, Aristote. De la génération et de la cor ruption, Paris 1966. —, De interpretatione, éd. L. Minio Paluello, Aristotelis categoriae et liber de interpreta tione, Oxford 1949 (repr. 1966), 4772. — 10 — —, Metaphysica, ed. W.D. Ross, 2 vols., Oxford 1953 (repr. 1970). —, Physica, ed. W.D. Ross, Oxford 1950 (repr. 1966). —, De philosophia, in Fragmenta selecta, ed. W.D. Ross, Oxford 1955, 7396. Asclepius, In Aristotelis Metaphysicorum Libros AZ, ed. M. Hayduck, Commentarla in Aristotelem Graeca, voi. VI.2, Berlin 1888. —, In Nicomachi Geraseni Pythagorei introductionem arithmeticam, ed. L. Tarân, Ascle pius of Tralles. Commentary to Nicomachus' introduction to Arithmetic, Transa ctions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s. 59.4, 1969. Atticus, Fragmenta, ed. E. des Places, S.J., Paris 1977. Augustine, De civitate Dei, vol. 1 (Lib. IXIII), éd. A. Kalb, Leipzig 1928; vol. 2 (Lib. XIVXXII), eds. B. Dombart and A. Kalb, Leipzig 1981. Chrysippus, Fragmenta Logica et physica, ed. J. von Arnim, Stoicorum veterum frag menta, vol. 2, Leipzig 1903 (repr. Stuttgart 1968), 1348. Cicero, De Finibus honorum et malorum, éd. Th. Schiche, Fase. 43, Leipzig 1915. —, De divinatione, ed. R. Giomini, Leipzig 1975. Clement of Alexandria, Stromata, eds. Ο. Stâhlin, L. Friichtel and U. Treu, Clemens Ale xandrinus, Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller, 52 (15), 17, Berlin, vol. 2: 1960, vol. 3: 1970. Damascius, De primis Principiis, ed. L. G. Westerink, Traité des premiers principes, Paris, vol. 1: 1986, vol. 2: 1989, vol. 3: 1991. —, In Platonis Phaedonem, éd. L. G. Westerink, The Greek commentaries on Plato's Phaedo, vol. 2, Amsterdam Oxford N. York 1977. —, Vitae Isidori reliquiae, ed. C. Zintzen, Hildesheim 1967. David, Prolegomena and In Porphyrii Isagogen, éd. A. Busse, Commentarla in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. XVIII.2, Berlin 1904. —, Definitions and Divisions of Philosophy, English translation of the Old Armenian ver sion with Introduction and Notes by B. Kendall and R. W. Thomson, Armenian Texts and Studies, vol. 5, Chico, CA 1983. Didymus, Commentarli in Job, ed. U. Hagedorn, D. Hagedorn and L. Koenen, Didymos der Blinde. Kommentar zu Hiob (7.20cll), pt. 3, Papyrologische Texte und Ab handlungen, vol. 3, Bonn 1968. Elias, In Porphyrii Isagogen and In Aristotelis Categorias, ed. A. Busse, Commentarla in Aristotelem Graeca, vol.