Map: Conservation Outcomes Northern Mesoamerica 2005
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Conservation Outcomes 88°W Northern Mesoamerica Roster of Key Biodiversity Areas * denotes priority 90°W Conservation Outcomes * 1 Selva Zoque atán * 2 Complejo Sierra de las Minas, Motagua, Biotopo e Yuc sula d 50 0 50 100 150 * 3 Sierra Madre de Chiapas enín e la P osta Norte d kilometers * 4 Cuchumatanes C * 5 Lacandona Cancún scale: 1/1,500,000 * 6 Laguna del Tigre projection: Albers Equal Area Conic Northern Mesoamerica central meridian: 90° west longitude * 7 El Gran Petén standard parallels: 15° & 20° north latitude * 8 Chiquibul/Montañas Mayas Mérida gu 9 Bosques Mesófilos del Norte de Chiapas a La na 1 / 1,500,000 nt 10 Sian Ka'an Pu ta ar CEPF focal area Biodiversity hotspots are regions 11 Corredor Sian Ka'an Calakmul all r V that harbor especially high 12 Volcanes Occidentales do 29 July 2005 rre numbers of endemic species and, 13 Izabal Caribe Co Valladolid at the same time, have been 14 Pantanos de Centla / Laguna de Terminos CEPF investment corridor significantly impacted by human 15 Cozumel 16 Costa Norte de la Península de Yucatán activities. Each hotspot faces Cozumel extreme threats and has already 17 Sierra de Ticul - Punto PUT Lacandona Key Biodiversity Area, CEPF Priority lost at least 70 percent of its 18 Humedales Costeros de Chiapas original natural vegetation. Over 19 Río Hondo Cozumel 50 percent of the world’s plant 20 Corredor Vallarta Punta Laguna 21 Selvas de Tabasco Cozumel species and 42 percent of all Key Biodiversity Area, Other terrestrial vertebrate species are 22 Zona Huave 23 Alta Verapaz a endemic to the biodiversity hotspots, making them urgent 24 Montebello † protected area priorities for biodiversity c G U L F O F conservation at a global scale. 20°N 20°N i Huehuetenango town (national capitals underlined) S i e r r a d e T i c u l - P u n t o P U T Campeche r country border e river Felipe Carrillo Puerto M E X I C O Si a n K a ' a n lake scale: 1/244,000,000 m projection: Albers Equal Area Conic 38° east longitude 7° south latitude † IUCN Categories Ia, Ib, II-VI a C o r r e d o r S i a n 92°W K a ' a n C a l a k m u l o data: o d 2000 National Forest Inventory of Mexico n o Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, México s H 2001 Central American Ecosystem Map Comisión Centroamericana de Ambiente y Desarrollo o U Laguna de í and World Bank s u Escarcega R Bahía m BirdLife International De e Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, México a Terminos c Xpujil Chetumal Chetumal Comisión Nacional de Áreas Protegidas, Guatemala i 94°W n Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad ta Consejo Internacional para la Preservación de las Aves México P a n t a n o s d e C e n t l a / L a g u n a d e T e r m i n o s Center for Applied Biodiversity Science at o a d Conservation International, Washington, DC USA v l n a M Conservation International, Selva Maya j o i Digital Chart of the World (DCW) r H G Global Shoreline Database, January 2001, Veridian (GDAIS) Ministerio de Ambiente, Ganadería y Alimentación de Guatemala Coatzacoalcos a Villahermosa C ri tomado del Plan Ecoregional de la Selva Maya, Z oque y Olmeca Jonuta an de la T NC-Pronatura Yucatán 18°N The Central American System of Protected Areas 18°N PROARCA-TNC-WCPA-CBM-CI Las Choapas VMap0, National Geospatial- Intelligence Agency E C l n extensive data preparation provided by: G A R.Jiménez Cruz - Regional Monitoring Coordinator r r H.Pulido Arguello - Monitoring Project Manager M E X I C O a Conservation International, Northern Mesoamerica Program n R P e t é n e I this map was produced by the Conservation Mapping Program Palenque M.Denil - Chief Cartographer S Laguna del Tigre a B K.Koenig - Cartographer S e l v a s d e T a b a s c o Belize City Tenosique n Center for Applied Biodiversity Science P B E L I Z E B Conservation International ed h 1919 M Street, NW ro E Washington, DC, USA e A i z t © June 2005 B e l Belmopan N Pr esa Ne zah B o s q u e M e s ó f i l o s S e l v a Z o q u e ua U S lc ó The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of yo s r t u Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of l d e l N o r t e d e C h i a p a s m E ac Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. A fundamental goal of i n A CEPF is to ensure civil society is engaged in biodiversity conservation. Santa María Chimalapas t a s a o Ocosingo Flores y a The political and geographic designations shown on this map do not imply the SELVA MAYA E ISLAS M expression of any opinion on the part of CEPF concerning the legal status or Tuxtla Gutiérrez San Cristóbal de las Casas Frontera s deliniation of the frontiers of any country, territory or area. Corozal Y CAYOS DEL CARIBE a ñ a Las Cruces t 86°W N n o M Benemérito / l M de las Américas u o b REGIÓN ZOQUE Y TIERRA S ALTAS n t i e q u b e h i l l C Z o n a H u a v e o Poptun S i L a c a n d o n a e Comitán de Domínguez G U L F O F 84°W Arriaga r r a • M Pre sa de 16°N Golfo de Tehuantepec a la H O N D U R A S d An g 16°N r ost e ura d Bahía de e C Ángel Albino Corzo Amatique H h Barillas 94°W u i m a A l t a V e r a p a z Chisec e p d a C u c h u m a t a n e s a s s l e s C I z a b a l C a r i b e o s t L a g o d e e e r o G U A T E M A L A I z a b a l s d e c h i c l o C Huehuetenango P o h i m a C o m p l e j o S i e r r a d e l a s p H O N D U R A S a P s Salama M i n a s , M o t a g u a , B i o t o p o Colonia Municipal o A Tapachula V o o t a g u a l c a n M c e s O c c i d e e n C t t t a l a e i s h Lago de While species outcomes have been defined in Honduras and c u Atitlán El Salvado r, site and corridor outcomes have yet to be identified. I S Guatemala u á l a F m a S O I C Tegucigalpa 14°N 14°N n O 84°W 92°W 86°W o C San Salvador i E t A E L S A L V A D O R N 90°W N I C A R A G U A a The CEPF Niche for Investment v The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) These targets are defined at three levels, species, their potential to conserve habitat of wide-ranging, ecosystem profile and five-year investment sites and landscapes, representing discrete units higher trophic level species. Because CEPF is a r strategy for the Northern Mesoamerica region was along an ecological continuum, using a data-driven global initiative, the team gave more weight in the developed based on stakeholder consultation and process and standardized criteria. While species analysis to considerations related to ranking in 88°W review of background reports coordinated by CI. outcomes have been defined all of Northern Critically Endangered species. Therefore, the final prioritization reflected more the species- e Seventy-four experts representing 42 scientific, Mesoamerica, including Honduras and El Salvador, governmental and nongovernmental organizations site and corridor outcomes have been identified only based ranking that emphasizes globally threatened from Belize, Guatemala and Mexico participated for the Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala portion of the species. In the end, CEPF decided to focus on eight s in the preparation of the profile. region. Species outcomes aim to avoid extinctions, of the 24 Key Biodiversity Areas, based on the Topography and the primary set of targets for species outcomes prioritization and an analysis of current investment. Overview Forest Cover Data on biodiversity, socioeconomic factors, are those species that are globally threatened Mesoamerican Hotspot Central America, 2001 Elevation (in meters) institutional context and conservation efforts were (Critically Endangered, Endangered and Vulnerable) For some species, protecting sites alone will not be Mexico, 2000 6000 n compiled and synthesized from more than 330 according to the IUCN Red List. In Northern sufficient to ensure their conservation in the long- 3000 organizations, representing international donors, Mesoamerica, a total of 470 species representing six term.