DOCSLIB.ORG

Moscow Victory Parade to See Dozens of Russian World-Class Bestsellers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moscow Victory Parade to See Dozens of Russian World-Class Bestsellers Moscow Victory Parade to see dozens of Russian world-class bestsellers Rosoboronexport, a member of Rostec, works ceaselessly to promote Russia's modern weapons in the world arms market. Some of them will end up in the parade to take place in Moscow on May 9 in commemoration of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War in 1941-1945. “While reminding us of the Great Victory, the parade serves as a demonstration of state-of- the-art equipment, developed by Russia's defense industry. Keeping up with the tradition, dozens of Russian weapons and military equipment will roll out to Red Square, including Uralvagonzavod’s armored vehicles, High Precision Systems’ SAMs, Tecmash’s MLRSs, Russian Helicopters’ aviation systems, etc. Among the most prominent newcomers is the upgraded A-50 flying radar, an airborne command post of the Air Force. Quite a few of Rostec’s products have proved their characteristics in real combat. Considerable interest in our equipment of foreign countries is evident in the ever-growing export,” notes Rostec's head Sergey Chemezov. Export derivatives of the Russian equipment expected in Red Square on May 9 are also listed in Rosoboronexport's catalog. These include Buk-M2E and Tor-M2E SAM systems, Pantsir-S1 gun and missile AD system, Iskander-E tactical missile system, Msta-S SP howitzer, Smerch multiple-launched rocket systems, numerous wheeled armored vehicles, namely Tigr-M, Typhoon-K and BTR-82A, as well as T-72-class tanks, BMPT tank support vehicle, IL-76MD-90A(E) military transport aircraft, MiG-29M multirole frontline fighter, Su-30SME multirole super-maneuverable fighter, Su-32 fighter-bomber and Su-35 multirole supermaneuverable fighter, Mi-28NE and Ka-52 gunships, and Mi-26T2 heavy transport helicopter. May 9 will also see the Armata tank, Bumerang personnel carrier, and Kurganets-25 fighting vehicle, all of them boasting a huge export potential. By taking part in the Victory Parade these systems demonstrate to our foreign partners the outstanding level of the latest developments and cutting-edge technologies of Russia’s defense industry. "Military and technical cooperation between Russia and foreign states has been on the rise. Only in the first four months of 2019 Rosoboronexport delivered abroad $4.9 bln. worth of military equipment, let alone signed new contracts for a total of $5.2 bln.,” reports Alexander Mikheev, Rosoboronexport's Director General. “We owe these to Russian specialists, involved in the military and technical cooperation, and manufacturers, conducting this enormous marketing endeavor, in which demonstrations at parades and exhibitions play by no means the least role.” According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, the military parades to take place all over Russia on May 9 will see an aggregate total of 1,600-plus pieces of military equipment. Foreign guests, among them military diplomats and correspondents of leading mass media agencies of the world, will be able to see military systems, not just comprising the backbone of the Russian military but enjoying the status of Russia's bestselling weapons in the world arms market. In 2019, mock-ups of military equipment exported by Rosoboronexport will also find their way to specialized exhibitions hosted by Russia, namely International Military and Technical Forum ARMY-2019 (June 25-30, Kubinka, Moscow region, rusarmyexpo.ru), International Maritime Defense Show IMDS-2019 (July 10-14, St. Petersburg, navalshow.ru) and MAKS-2019 (August 27 – September 1, Zhukovsky, Moscow region, aviasalon.com). Russian Federation, ROSOBORONEXPORT, 27 Stromynka str., 107076, Moscow, Public Relations and Media Service Phone: +7 (495) 534 61 83; Fax: +7 (495) 534 61 53 www.roe.ru Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consolidated Canadian Autonomous Sanctions List / La Liste Consolidée Des Sanctions Autonomes Canadiennes
    Consolidated Canadian Autonomous Sanctions List / La Liste consolidée des sanctions autonomes canadiennes Date of Birth / Date de naissance (Day- Item # / Numero Regulation / Réglement Entity / Entité Title / Titre Last Name / Nom de famille Given Names / Prénom Aliases / Alias Schedule jour/month-mois/year-année) d’article Burma / Birmanie Air Bagan Air Bagan Holdings Pte. Ltd., Air Bagan Limited 1 1 Burma / Birmanie Bandoola Transportation Co. Ltd. 1 2 Burma / Birmanie Berger Paint Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1 3 Burma / Birmanie Dagon Brewery 1 4 Burma / Birmanie Granite Tile Factory (Kyaikto) 1 5 Hantha Waddy Golf Resort and Myodaw Burma / Birmanie 1 6 (City) Club Ltd. Htoo Wood, Htoo Wood Products, Htoo Wood Products Burma / Birmanie Htoo Furniture 1 7 Pte. Limited, Htoo Wood-Based Industry Htoo Trading Company Limited, Htoo Trading Group Burma / Birmanie Htoo Group of Companies 1 8 Company Burma / Birmanie Innwa Bank 1 9 Burma / Birmanie MEC Disposable Syringe Factory 1 10 Burma / Birmanie MEC Marble Mine 1 11 Burma / Birmanie MEC Marble Tiles Factory 1 12 Burma / Birmanie MEC Burma Cable Wire Factory 1 13 Burma / Birmanie MEC Oxygen and Gases Factory 1 14 Burma / Birmanie MEC Ship Breaking Service 1 15 Burma / Birmanie MEC Steel Mills (Hmaw Bi/Pyi/Ywama) 1 16 Myanma Investment and Commercial Bank, Burma Burma / Birmanie MICB 1 17 Investment and Commercial Bank Myaing Galay (Rhino Brand) Cement Burma / Birmanie 1 18 Factory Burma / Birmanie Myanma Economic Bank Burma Economic Bank 1 19 Burma / Birmanie Myanma Economic Corporation (MEC) 1 20 Burma / Birmanie Myanma Foreign Trade Bank Burma Foreign Trade Bank 1 21 Burma / Birmanie Burma Ar (Power) Construction Services 1 22 Burma / Birmanie Burma Brewery Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Fondation Pierre Du Bois | Ch
    N°2 | February 2021 Structures of Genocide: Making Sense of the New War for Nagorno-Karabakh Joel Veldkamp * “Terrorists we’re fighting and we’re never gonna stop The prostitutes who prosecute have failed us from the start Can you see us?” - System of a Down, “Genocidal Humanoidz” On December 10, 2020, Turkey and Azerbaijan held a joint victory parade in Azerbaijan’s capital of Baku. Turkey’s president Tayyib Recep Erdogan and Azerbaijan’s president Ilham Aliyev stood together on a dais in front of twenty Turkish and Azerbaijani flags, as 3,000 members of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces marched by, displaying military hardware captured from their Armenian foes. Military bands played the anthems of the old Ottoman Empire, the Turkish dynasty that ruled much of the Middle East in the name of Islam until World War I. Azerbaijani jets roared over the capital, dropping smoke in the green, blue and red colors of the Azerbaijani flag. Certainly, there was much to celebrate. In forty-four days of brutal combat, Azerbaijani forces reversed the humiliating defeat they experienced at Armenia’s hands in 1994 and recaptured much of the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. Turkey worked with Azerbaijan hand-in-glove during the war, supplying it with weapons, providing intelligence and air support, and bringing in thousands of battle-hardened fighters from Syria to fight on the ground.1 The victory opened up the possibility that the hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijanis driven from Armenian-occupied territory in the first Karabakh war, many of whom had lived for decades in squalid camps in Baku and its environs, would be able to go home.2 It was an impressive vindication of the alliance of these two Turkish states, exemplifying their alliance’s motto, “two states, one nation.” But a darker spirit was on display during the parade.
    [Show full text]
  • [Public Notice 10159] Guidance on Specified Persons Under Section
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/04/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-26087, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4710-27 DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 10159] Guidance on Specified Persons Under Section 231 of the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 ACTION: Guidance to specify persons that are part of, or operate for or on behalf of, the defense and intelligence sectors of the Government of the Russian Federation; notice. SUMMARY: The Department of State is issuing this guidance to specify the persons that are part of, or operate for or on behalf of, the defense and intelligence sectors of the Government of the Russian Federation. This guidance, including the list specifying persons, was developed through a robust interagency process and may be updated or amended as circumstances warrant. APPLICABLE DATES: The specification of persons identified in this notice pursuant to the Act is applicable on [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip A. Foley Director, Office of Counterproliferation Initiatives, Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, tel.: 202-647-5193, [email protected]. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the authority in Section 231(d) of the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (Pub. L. 115-44), (“the Act”), the Secretary of State is issuing this guidance to specify the following as persons that are part of, or
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine in World War II
    Ukraine in World War II. — Kyiv, Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance, 2015. — 28 p., ill. Ukrainians in the World War II. Facts, figures, persons. A complex pattern of world confrontation in our land and Ukrainians on the all fronts of the global conflict. Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance Address: 16, Lypska str., Kyiv, 01021, Ukraine. Phone: +38 (044) 253-15-63 Fax: +38 (044) 254-05-85 Е-mail: [email protected] www.memory.gov.ua Printed by ПП «Друк щоденно» 251 Zelena str. Lviv Order N30-04-2015/2в 30.04.2015 © UINR, texts and design, 2015. UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF NATIONAL REMEMBRANCE www.memory.gov.ua UKRAINE IN WORLD WAR II Reference book The 70th anniversary of victory over Nazism in World War II Kyiv, 2015 Victims and heroes VICTIMS AND HEROES Ukrainians – the Heroes of Second World War During the Second World War, Ukraine lost more people than the combined losses Ivan Kozhedub Peter Dmytruk Nicholas Oresko of Great Britain, Canada, Poland, the USA and France. The total Ukrainian losses during the war is an estimated 8-10 million lives. The number of Ukrainian victims Soviet fighter pilot. The most Canadian military pilot. Master Sergeant U.S. Army. effective Allied ace. Had 64 air He was shot down and For a daring attack on the can be compared to the modern population of Austria. victories. Awarded the Hero joined the French enemy’s fortified position of the Soviet Union three Resistance. Saved civilians in Germany, he was awarded times. from German repression. the highest American The Ukrainians in the Transcarpathia were the first during the interwar period, who Awarded the Cross of War.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 193/Wednesday, October 5, 2016
    69190 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Notices system. The MTSNAC will consider congestion and increase mobility Authority: 49 CFR part 1.93(a); 5 U.S.C. new bylaws, form subcommittees and throughout the domestic transportation 552b; 41 CFR parts 102–3; 5 U.S.C. app. working groups, and develop work system; Sections 1–16 plans and recommendations. e. actions designed to strengthen By Order of the Maritime Administrator. DATES: The meeting will be held on maritime capabilities essential to Dated: September 29, 2016. Tuesday, October 18, 2016 from 8:00 economic and national security; T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr., f. ways to modernize the maritime a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and Wednesday, Secretary, Maritime Administration. October 19, 2016 from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 workforce and inspire and educate the next generation of mariners; [FR Doc. 2016–23989 Filed 10–4–16; 8:45 am] p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time BILLING CODE 4910–81–P (EDT). g. actions designed to encourage the continued development of maritime ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at innovation and; the St. Louis City Center Hotel, 400 h. any other actions MARAD could South 14th Street, St. Louis, MO 63103. take to meet its mission to foster, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric promote, and develop the maritime Office of Foreign Assets Control Shen, Co-Designated Federal Officer at: industry of the United States. (202) 308–8968, or Capt. Jeffrey Public Participation Sanctions Actions Pursuant to Flumignan, Co-Designated Federal Executive Orders 13660, 13661, 13662, The meeting will be open to the Official at (212) 668–2064 or via email: and 13685 [email protected] or visit the MTSNAC public.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE of FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL CHANGES to the Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List
    OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL CHANGES TO THE Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List SINCE JANUARY 1, 2015 This publication of Treasury's Office of Foreign center/sanctions/Programs/Pages/ukraine.aspx# Order 13662 Directive Determination - Subject to Assets Control ("OFAC") is a reference tool directives. [UKRAINE-EO13662] (Linked To: Directive 2; alt. Executive Order 13662 Directive providing actual notice of actions by OFAC with OPEN JOINT-STOCK COMPANY ROSNEFT Determination - Subject to Directive 4; For more respect to persons that are identified pursuant to OIL COMPANY). information on directives, please visit the Executive Order 13662 and are listed on the AKTSIONERNOE OBSHCHESTVO following link: http://www.treasury.gov/resource- Sectoral Sanctions I dentifications List (SSI List). KOMMERCHESKI BANK GLOBEKS (f.k.a. center/sanctions/Programs/Pages/ukraine.aspx# The latest changes may appear here prior to their CJSC GLOBEXBANK; a.k.a. GLOBEKSBANK, directives. [UKRAINE-EO13662] (Linked To: publication in the Federal Register, and it is AO; a.k.a. GLOBEX COMMERCIAL BANK, OPEN JOINT-STOCK COMPANY ROSNEFT intended that users rely on changes indicated in JOINT STOCK COMPANY; a.k.a. OIL COMPANY). this document. Such changes reflect official GLOBEXBANK; f.k.a. ZAKRYTOE BANK BELVEB OJSC (a.k.a. actions of OFAC, and will be ref lected as soon as AKTSIONERNOE OBSHCHESTVO BELVESHECONOMBANK OAO; a.k.a. practicable in the Federal Register under the KOMMERCHESKI BANK GLOBEKS), d. 59 str. BELVNESHECONOMBANK OPEN JOINT index heading "Foreign Assets Control." New 2 ul. Zemlyanoi Val, Moscow 109004, Russia; STOCK COMPANY), 29 Pobeditelei ave., Minsk Federal Register notices with regard to SWIFT/BIC GLOB RU MM; Website 220004, Belarus; SWIFT/BIC BELB BY 2X; identifications made under Executive Order 13662 globexbank.ru; Executive Order 13662 Directive Website bveb.by; Executive Order 13662 may be published at any time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Victory Contingent, 1946: Australia, Britain, And
    Victory contingent, 1946 By Anton Donohoe-Marques Abstract In the early months of 1946, approval by the Australian Cabinet to send a 250 strong contingent of Australia’s armed forces to the Victory Parade in London, to be held later that year. The parade, was to celebrate the triumph of the Allied forces in the Second World War. The Contingent performed its function, met with significant controversy, and returned to a relatively flat reception in Australia. And yet, the story of the Contingent, as a social and cultural exchange, says much about the state of Australia’s relationship with Britain and the Empire in the post-war period. 1 In March of 1946, a contingent was raised from the Australia’s military forces for the purpose of taking part in the planned victory celebrations in London later that year. After some difficulties in raising the group, the Australian Victory Contingent left Australia in April of 1946. Making stops along the way, the contingent arrived in England in late May. The day of the parade came on 8 June and crowds of more than five million people came out to watch the marchers. After the parade, many in the contingent took the chance to tour Britain and Europe, and a small group was specially selected to tour Germany. The contingent finally left Europe in early July, stopping at a number of ports on the way home – which was not entirely without incident. The Australian Victory contingent was ostensibly a chance for Australians to celebrate their involvement in the victory of the Allied powers over their Axis enemies.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Turkey
    Security Review GiorgiZurab B Batiashviliilanishvili Turkey-Greece Confrontation and Georgia: Threats and Challenges Turkey's Place and Role in the Second Karabakh War 2020 1 All rights reserved and belong to Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, including electronic and mechanical, without the prior written permission of the publisher. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies. Copyright © 2020 Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies 2 The second, 44-day war in Karabakh lasted from September 27 to November 10, 2020 ending with the signing of a ceasefire agreement by the presidents of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia. This document is plainly a capitulation of the Armenian side. This war has three clear winners - Azerbaijan, Russia and Turkey: - Azerbaijan, which after a 27-year pause, has regained control of most of the occupied territories, also enabling the return of refugees thereto. - Russia, which has deployed its peacekeeping forces in Nagorno-Karabakh for at least five years and gained control of the Lachin corridor connecting Armenia to Nagorno- Karabakh, will also control the pass connecting Nakhichevan to the rest of Azerbaijan.1 - Turkey, which became a game changer in the conflict by providing assistance to its brotherly Azerbaijani side. In fact, Ankara has for the first time and successfully participated in the ongoing military conflict in the post-Soviet space and strengthened its influence in the Caucasus. This issue, therefore, requires a more detailed discussion and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir Putin and the Celebration of World War II in Russia*
    ! e Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 38 (2011) 172–200 brill.nl/spsr Performing Memory: Vladimir Putin and the Celebration of World War II in Russia* Elizabeth A. Wood Professor, History Faculty, M.I.T. Abstract By making World War II a personal event and also a sacred one, Vladimir Putin has created a myth and a ritual that elevates him personally, uniting Russia (at least theoretically) and showing him as the natural hero-leader, the warrior who is personally associated with defending the Motherland. Several settings illustrate this personal performance of memory: Putin’s meetings with veterans, his narration of his own family’s suff erings in the Leningrad blockade, his visits to churches associated with the war, his participation in parades and the creation of new uniforms, and his creation of a girls’ school that continues the military tradition. In each of these settings Putin demonstrates a connection to the war and to Russia’s greatness as dutiful son meeting with his elders, as legitimate son of Leningrad, and as father to a new generation of girls associated with the military. Each setting helps to reinforce a masculine image of Putin as a ruler who is both autocrat and a man of the people. Keywords Vladimir Putin ; World War II; memory ; patriotism; gender ; masculinity; Stalin ; Stalinism ; Dmitry Medvedev From his fi rst inauguration on May 7, 2000 and his fi rst Victory Day speech on May 9, 2000, over the course of the next eleven years, Vladimir Putin has repeatedly personifi ed himself as the defender, even the savior of the Motherland.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating Diversity in the Guard and Reserve
    DEOMI 2001 Calendar Cover Images The images on the cover of the 2001 DEOMI calendar attempts to capture the theme of the calendar, “A Celebration of Diversity and Multiculturalism in the Armed Forces Reserve and National Guard.” These images, from left to right and top to bottom are: Lt. Gen. Edward Baca, chief of the National Guard Bureau, 1992-96, is of Mexican-American heritage, from New Mexico. Appointed by President William Clinton in October 1994 as the Guard Bureau’s 24th chief, General Baca retired on July 31, 1998, after 42 years of military service. In his 46 months as chief of the National Guard Bureau, he was one of the most widely traveled chiefs in National Guard history, and influential in expanding the Guard’s horizons beyond this nation’s borders. Photo courtesy of National Guard Bureau A wounded WWI veteran of the 369th Infantry Regiment, 93d Infantry Division, watches the 1919 Victory Parade, New York City, with his family. Nicknamed “Harlem Hellfighters,” the much-decorated 369th was the redesignated National Guard 15th New York Infantry Regiment. Photo courtesy of New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs: Military History The 200th Coast Artillery, a redesignated New Mexico National Guard unit, was photographed in preparations for defense of the Philippines in WWII. The predominantly Mexican-American unit, chosen partly for Spanish language skills, played a crucial role in covering the retreat of the Philippines’ defenders into Bataan. Photo courtesy of Bataan-Corregidor Memorial Foundation of New Mexico, IncSociety Cover of the Air National Guard magazine Citizen Airman.
    [Show full text]
  • Client Update U.S. Issues Guidance on Sanctions Relating to Russia's
    Client Update 1 October 30, 2017 Client Update U.S. Issues Guidance on Sanctions Relating to Russia’s Defense and Intelligence Sectors On Friday, October 27, the U.S. Department of State issued public guidance on the implementation of Section 231 of the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA). Section 231 of CAATSA requires the U.S. President to impose potential sanctions against individuals or entities that knowingly engage in “significant transactions” with persons that are a part of, or operating for or on behalf of, Russia’s defense or intelligence sectors. An overview of CAATSA is provided in our Client Update of July 28, 2017. The new guidance is accompanied by a list of entities considered to be operating in Russia’s defense or intelligence sectors. The guidance indicates, however, that not all large transactions with the listed entities will be considered “significant.” Rather, the State Department will focus largely on defense-related or intelligence-related transactions. Section 231 of CAATSA authorizes sanctions for conduct engaged on or after August 2, 2017, with any sanctions imposed becoming effective on or after January 29, 2018. The State Department also has stated that it intends, when possible, to “work with” persons contemplating transactions with the listed persons to help avoid sanctionable transactions. DEFENSE AND INTELLIGENCE SECTORS Over thirty entities, listed in the appendix to this update, are identified in the guidance as persons that are part of, or operating for or on behalf of, Russia’s defense or intelligence sectors. As the State Department’s guidance makes clear, the entities named in the guidance are not subject to U.S.
    [Show full text]