DOCSLIB.ORG

Signatories to the Urban Design Protocol [Ministry for the Environment] ATTACHMENT 3 to REPORT 06.671 PAGE 1 of 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Signatories to the Urban Design Protocol [Ministry for the Environment] ATTACHMENT 3 to REPORT 06.671 PAGE 1 of 4 Signatories to the Urban Design Protocol [Ministry for the Environment] ATTACHMENT 3 TO REPORT 06.671 PAGE 1 OF 4 Signatories to the Urban Design Protocol The leading signatories to the New Zealand Urban Design Protocol come from a wide range of organisations spanning central government, local government, the private sector, educational institutes, professional bodies and other sector groups. Each of these organisations has made a commitment to create quality urban design through their own actions. By setting an example for others to follow, they will make a real difference to the quality of our urban areas. Signatories as at 5 October 2006: 119 Central Government • Accident Compensation Corporation (22 June 2006) • Auckland Regional Public Health Service • Department of Building and Housing • Department of Labour (19 December 2005) • Housing New Zealand • Land Transport New Zealand • Landcare Research • Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management • Ministry for Culture and Heritage • Ministry of Economic Development (10 March 2005) • Ministry of Education • Ministry for the Environment • Ministry of Health • Ministry of Justice (8 February 2006) • Ministry of Transport • New Zealand Defence Force • New Zealand Historic Places Trust • New Zealand Police • SPARC (17 March 2006) • Toi Te Ora Public Health • Transit New Zealand Local Government • Auckland City Council • Auckland Regional Council • Christchurch City Council • Dunedin City Council • Environment Waikato • Environment Canterbury (22 April 2005) • Far North District Council (7 April 2005) • Franklin District Council • Hamilton City Council (11 August 2005) • Hastings District Council http://www.mfe.govt.nz/issues/urban/design-protocol/signatories.html 07/11/2006 Signatories to the Urban Design Protocol [Ministry for the Environment] ATTACHMENT 3 TO REPORT 06.671 PAGE 2 OF 4 • Invercargill City Council • Kaikoura District Council (2 October 2006) • Kapiti Coast District Council (22 June 2005) • Local Government New Zealand • Manukau City Council (15 March 2005) • Matamata Piako District Council (1 August 2006) • North Shore City Council • Papakura District Council (15 August 2005) • Queenstown Lakes District Council (17 May 2006) • Rodney District Council • Southland District Council (5 July 2005) • Tauranga City Council (30 March 2005) • Timaru District Council (20 May 2005) • Waitakere City Council • Wellington City Council • Wellington Waterfront Limited (30 August 2005) Developers and Investors • Hopper Developments • Kitchener Group of Companies • McConnell Property • Pritchard Group (22 June 2005) • Property Council of New Zealand • Vodafone NZ Consultants • Antanas Procuta Architects (22 August 2005) • Architecture Workshop • Architectus • Beca • Boffa Miskell • Boon Goldsmith Bhaskar - Team Architecture • Chow:Hill Architects (11 January 2006) • Connell Wagner (15 May 2006) • Davis Ogilvie Partners • Envision New Zealand (21 July 2005) • Fox Associates • GHD Ltd (10 February 2006) • Graeme Mclndoe • Harrison Grierson Consultants (6 May 2005) • Hill Young Cooper • Hugh Briggs Partnership (24 November 2005) • Ian Butcher Architects • Isthmus Group • Landlink Ltd (22 June 2005) http://www.mfe.govt.nz/issues/urban/design-protocol/signatories.html 07/11/2006 Signatories to the Urban Design Protocol [Ministry for the Environment] ATTACHMENT 3 TO REPORT 06.671 PAGE 3 OF 4 • Jerram Tocker Architects • MWH New Zealand • Opus International Consultants • Planit R W Batty Associates (14 April 2005) • RA Skidmore Urban Design • Roger Boulter Consulting • Steve Abley - Chartered Transportation Engineering (19 December 2005) • Streets in Sync Limited (8 February 2006) • Surveying the Bay (18 October 2005) • Thornley Design (17 March 2005) • Transport Planning Solutions Ltd (27 March 2006) • Transurban • Tse Group Limited (2 June 2006) • Urban Design Network (27 March 2006) • Urbanismplus • Urban Perspectives • URS New Zealand (22 December 2005) • Wes Edwards Consulting Professional Institutes • Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand • IPENZ Transportation Group • New Zealand Institute of Architects • New Zealand Institute of Landscape Architects • New Zealand Institute of Surveyors • New Zealand Planning Institute • Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Educational Institutes • Department of Planning, the University of Auckland • Lincoln University • Massey University (17 October 2005) • University of Otago • University of Waikato (4 July 2006) • Unitec New Zealand • Victoria University of Wellington Sector Organisations • Building Research Association of New Zealand • Cancer Society of New Zealand • Canterbury Employers Chamber of Commerce (21 March 2005) • CCS • Christchurch Civic Trust • Committee for Auckland http://www.mfe.govt.nz/issues/urban/design-protocol/signatories.html 07/11/2006 Signatories to the Urban Design Protocol [Ministry for the Environment] ATTACHMENT 3 TO REPORT 06.671 PAGE 4 OF 4 • Cycling Advocates Network * • Environment and Business Group • Living Streets Aotearoa * • National Heart Foundation of New Zealand (3 March 2006) • New Zealand Construction Industry Council * • Royal Astronomical Society of New Zealand * • Sustainable Business Network * • Sustainable Otautahi Christchurch Inc. (10 July 2006) • Town Centres Association of New Zealand * Organisations who signed up prior to the launch of the Protocol on 8 March 2005 http://wwvv.mfe.govt.nz/issues/urban/design-protocol/signatories.html 07/11/2006.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2006/07
    Hamilton City Council 2006/07 Annual Report Building A Vibrant Hamilton INVESTING IN OUR PEOPLE CREATING IDENTITY & PROSPERITY PROTECTING OUR FUTURE Hamilton City Council Municipal Offices Garden Place Private Bag 3010 Hamilton 3240 Ph: 07 838 6699 Fax: 07 838 6599 Email: [email protected] Website: www.hamilton.co.nz ISSN 1178-1017 Whakatauki and He Mihi Kotahi ano te kohao te ngira E kuhuna ai te miro ma, te miro whero Me te miro pango. A muri I a au kia mau ki te ture, Ki te whakapono, ki te aroha. Hei aha te aha! Hei aha te aha! There is but one eye of the needle Through which the white, red and black threads must pass. After me obey the commandments, keep faith, And hold fast to love and charity Forsake all else. Na take i korerohia e tatau i mua Tui ai te kupu korero I korerotia Kia tu te winiwini kia tu te wanawana I nga pu korero I wanangatia I roto I te whai ao I te ao marama We bring our combined history and past discussions Into our plans here for the future. Be open and stand strongly For the issues considered and discussed, To benefit the world, now and in the future. Na Potatau Te Wherowhero, 1858 This Annual Report was adopted by Hamilton City Council on 28 September 2007. The report, which was audited by Audit New Zealand, received an unqualified audit opinion. Table of Contents (RAARANGI KORERO) 1.0 Mayor and Chief Executive’s Letter....................................................................1 2.0 The Annual Report In Context............................................................................5 3.0 Your City,
    [Show full text]
  • Monthy Grant Summary April 2019-Feb 2020 .Xlsx
    Organisation Name TLA Amount Requested Allocated Amount WAIKATO / BOP Animal Evac New Zealand Trust Board Whakatane District Council $8,262.00 $2,817.62 Bay of Plenty Pipes & Drums Inc Tauranga City Council $24,070.00 $7,000.00 Beerescourt Tennis Club Inc. Hamilton City Council $5,480.00 $3,000.00 Blue Light Ventures Inc - Whakatane Whakatane District Council $55,000.00 $30,000.00 Box Office Boxing Inc New Plymouth District Council $22,000.00 $2,200.00 Coastguard Eastern Region Inc Tauranga City Council $126,695.00 $50,000.00 East End Surf Life Saving Club Inc New Plymouth District Council $27,200.00 $8,000.00 Frankton School Hamilton City Council $51,270.00 $25,000.00 Hamilton Cricket Assn Inc Hamilton City Council $35,000.00 $30,000.00 Hamilton Squash & Tennis Club Inc Hamilton City Council $30,000.00 $20,000.00 Hillcrest High School Hamilton City Council $18,350.00 $13,755.00 Hukanui School Hamilton City Council $40,000.00 $10,000.00 Katch Katikati Inc Western Bay of Plenty District Council $25,000.00 $10,000.00 Knighton Normal School Hamilton City Council $17,690.00 $8,000.00 Lake Taupo Cycle Challenge Trust Taupo District Council $8,346.00 $8,299.70 Maketu Volunteer Fire Brigade Inc Western Bay of Plenty District Council $2,299.00 $2,299.00 Matamata Childcare Centre Inc Matamata-Piako District Council $1,414.00 $1,230.00 Mount Maunganui Badminton Club Inc Tauranga City Council $8,732.00 $7,000.00 Mt Maunganui Primary School Tauranga City Council $2,181.00 $2,181.00 Northern Districts Cricket Assn Inc Western Bay of Plenty District
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Disposal Facilities
    Waste Disposal Facilities S Russell Landfill ' 0 Ahipara Landfill ° Far North District Council 5 3 Far North District Council Claris Landfill - Auckland City Council Redvale Landfill Waste Management New Zealand Limited Whitford Landfill - Waste Disposal Services Tirohia Landfill - HG Leach & Co. Limited Hampton Downs Landfill - EnviroWaste Services Ltd Waiapu Landfill Gisborne District Council Tokoroa Landfill Burma Road Landfill South Waikato District Council Whakatane District Council Waitomo District Landfill Rotorua District Sanitary Landfill Waitomo District Council Rotorua District Council Broadlands Road Landfill Taupo District Council Colson Road Landfill New Plymouth District Council Ruapehu District Landfill Ruapehu District Council New Zealand Wairoa - Wairoa District Council Waiouru Landfill - New Zealand Defence Force Chatham Omarunui Landfill Hastings District Council Islands Bonny Glenn Midwest Disposal Limited Central Hawke's Bay District Landfill S ' Central Hawke's Bay District Council 0 ° 0 4 Levin Landfill Pongaroa Landfill Seafloor data provided by NIWA Horowhenua District Council Tararua District Council Eves Valley Landfill Tasman District Council Spicer Valley Eketahuna Landfill Porirua City Council Silverstream Landfill Tararua District Council Karamea Refuse Tip Hutt City Council Buller District Council Wainuiomata Landfill - Hutt City Council Southern Landfill - Wellington City Council York Valley Landfill Marlborough Regional Landfill (Bluegums) Nelson City Council Marlborough District Council Maruia / Springs
    [Show full text]
  • South Island Infrastructure Investment
    South Island Infrastructure Investment • Rolling out more than $7 billion of investment in transport projects, schools, hospitals and water infrastructure across the South Island. • Commitment to rolling our shovel-ready projects and a pipeline of long-term projects to create certainty for our construction sector. Labour will continue to build on its strong record of investment in infrastructure and roll out more than $7 billion of infrastructure investment in the South Island. Our $7 billion of infrastructure investment in the South Island provides certainty to the regions and employers. This investment will result in long-term job creation and significant economic benefits. In government, we have managed the books wisely. With historically low interest rates, we are able to outline this much-needed investment in infrastructure. This investment is both affordable and the right thing to do. This will not be all of our infrastructure investment in the next term, and we will continue to invest in capital infrastructure for health, housing, transport and local government, as well as other areas. But this provides a pipeline of work that will assist us in recovering from the impacts of COVID-19. The overall infrastructure investment for the South Island includes: • $274.1 million of investment via the New Zealand Upgrade programme for transport projects • $368.72 million from the Provincial Growth Fund • $667 million from the IRG projects • $3.5 billion from the National Land Transport Programme (forecast 2018-2021). • $6 million from the
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand G-.Azette
    ~umb. 42. 1715 THE NEW ZEALAND G-.AZETTE JJublisgtb hu iutgorit11. WELLINGTON, THURSD.AYJ JUNE 8, 1939. Additional Land taken for Post and Telegraph Purposes in Additional Land taken for the Purposes of a Secund,ary Sc}wol the City of Nelson. in the Borough of Thames. · · [L.S.] GALWAY, Governor-General. [L.S.] · GALWAY, Governor-General. A PROCLAMATION. A PROCLAMATION. N pursuance and exercise of the powers and authorities N pursuance and exercise of the powers ·and authorities I vested in me by the Public Works Act, 1928, and of I vested in me by the Public Works Act, 1928, and of every other power and authority in anywise enabling me every other power and authority in anywise enabling me in in this behalf, I, George Vere Arundel!, Viscount Galway, this behalf, I, George Vere Arundell, Viscount• Gahvruy, Governor=General of the Dominion of New Zealand, do Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, do hereby proclaim and declare that the land described in hereby -proclaim and declare that the land described· in the the Schedule hereto is hereby taken for Post and Telegraph Schedule hereto is hereby taken for the purposes of a purposes; and I do also declare that this Proclamation secondary school; and I do also declare that this Proclamation shall take effect on .and after the twelfth day of June, one shall take effect on and after the twelfth day of June, thousand nine hundred and thirty-nine. one thousand nine hundred and thirty-nine. SCHEDULE. SCHEDULE. APPROXIMATE area of the piece of land taken : 1 rood .APPROXIlllATE area of the piece of land taken : 26·7 perches.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Stand Made Easy a Candidate’S Guide to Local Government
    Making a stand made easy A candidate’s guide to local government Welcome Lawrence Yule President, Local Government New Zealand I am pleased that you are considering Democracy only works when citizens are standing for election. Local government prepared to stand up and contribute to the provides for the well-being of communities public good and, to be effective, elected and leads, nurtures and responds members need to reflect the diversity of to community views. A key principle our communities. underpinning local democracy is that To stand for office you simply need to be decision-making power should rest as a New Zealand citizen and enrolled on close as possible to the communities the Parliamentary electoral roll, willing to affected by the decisions made. participate and committed to serving your It’s also important councils represent local community. Elected members take an their communities and operate oath to faithfully, impartially and according effectively and efficiently. to their best skill and judgement, execute and perform their duties in the interests of Local Government New Zealand believes the community, city, district or region. that local democracy is about: • having the right mix of people, The role of an elected member can be elected locally, to best represent demanding at times, but it is also highly each community; rewarding. I hope this publication gives • ensuring services are provided to you valuable information to help you the community in the best way on your way. If you would like more possible; information please check out our website • taking a collective approach to at www.lgnz.co.nz or speak to the electoral meeting community needs; and officer of the council in the area you want • creating a sense of local identity to stand in.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthy Grant Summary April 2019-Feb 2020 .Xlsx
    Organisation Name TLA Amount Requested Allocated Amount WAIKATO / BOP Prostate Cancer Foundation of N Z Inc Hamilton City Council $64,434.54 $35,000.00 K'aute Pasifika Trust Hamilton City Council $25,690.00 $10,000.00 Swim Waikato Inc Hamilton City Council $56,000.00 $45,000.00 Matamata Clay Target Club Inc Matamata-Piako District Council $8,849.00 $7,703.00 Highlands Amateur Swimming Club Inc New Plymouth District Council $10,000.00 $3,333.00 T F K A - Pukekura Free Kindergarten New Plymouth District Council $3,600.00 $3,600.00 Fitzroy Surf Club Inc New Plymouth District Council $8,945.00 $5,000.00 Opotiki Primary School Opotiki District Council $20,580.00 $20,580.00 Photoplayer Restoration Trust Opotiki District Council $28,200.00 $10,000.00 B o P Indoor Bowls Centre Inc Rotorua District Council $5,579.00 $5,579.00 Thames Rugby & Sports Club Inc Thames-Coromandel District Council $31,620.00 $20,000.00 Thames Valley Tangata Ora Trust Thames-Coromandel District Council $4,768.00 $4,311.00 Whangamata Community Services Trust Thames-Coromandel District Council $1,285.00 $1,048.00 Tauranga Primary School Tauranga City Council $10,000.00 $7,000.00 Bay of Plenty Dragon Boat Club Inc Tauranga City Council $18,689.00 $5,000.00 Tauranga Living Without Violence Collective Trust Tauranga City Council $40,000.00 $20,000.00 Otumoetai Tennis Club Inc Tauranga City Council $26,211.00 $10,000.00 W B O P P A - Pyes Pa Playcentre Tauranga City Council $9,685.30 $6,000.00 Oropi School Tauranga City Council $23,990.00 $10,000.00 Kidz Need Dadz Charitable
    [Show full text]
  • Monthy Grant Summary April 2019-Feb 2020 .Xlsx
    Organisation Name TLA Amount Requested Allocated Amount WAIKATO / BOP Waikato Institute for Leisure & Sport Studies Hamilton City Council $60,000.00 $45,000.00 Te Rapa Rugby Club Inc Hamilton City Council $29,604.00 $20,000.00 Endometriosis Waikato Hamilton City Council $12,673.04 $12,673.00 Te Tamawai Trust Hamilton City Council $64,800.00 $45,000.00 Hamilton B M X Club Inc Hamilton City Council $34,600.00 $20,000.00 Waikato Badminton Assn Inc Hamilton City Council $13,123.00 $12,177.00 Waikato Basketball Council Inc Hamilton City Council $168,267.00 $50,000.00 Waikato Diving Inc Hamilton City Council $3,700.00 $3,286.00 Waikato Rugby Union Inc Hamilton City Council $120,000.00 $120,000.00 University of Waikato Hockey Club Hamilton City Council $25,000.00 $5,000.00 Waikato University Netball Club Inc Hamilton City Council $15,000.00 $4,000.00 Melville Assn Football Club Inc Hamilton City Council $39,861.00 $30,336.00 University of Waikato Basketball Club Hamilton City Council $5,000.00 $2,500.00 Waikato Community Broadcasting Charitable Trust Hamilton City Council $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Hamilton East Croquet Club Inc Hamilton City Council $3,153.00 $3,153.00 Thames Valley Basketball Assn Inc Hauraki District Council $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Tarawera High School Kawerau District Council $16,420.00 $14,278.00 Morrinsville Bowling Club Inc Matamata-Piako District Council $68,000.00 $40,000.00 Morrinsville Agricultural & Pastoral Soc Inc Matamata-Piako District Council $21,266.00 $10,000.00 Morrinsville Primary School Matamata-Piako District Council
    [Show full text]
  • $Qghuvrq +Rxvh
    Anderson House Feasibility Study for a Multi-Use Solution for Anderson House and Park Venture Southland September 2017 1 Table of Contents Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 Background ........................................................................................................................... 5 Strategic Context .................................................................................................................. 7 Community and social benefits ...................................................................................... 7 Market Analysis.............................................................................................................. 7 Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................... 9 Proposed Friends of Anderson House and Park Trust ................................................. 10 Concept .............................................................................................................................. 11 Operational model ........................................................................................................ 11 Commercial viability ..................................................................................................... 12 Infrastructure Requirements ......................................................................................... 13 Functions Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Monthy Grant Summary April 2019-Feb 2020 .Xlsx
    Organisation Name TLA Amount Requested Allocated Amount WAIKATO / BOP Alan Duff Charitable Foundation Western Bay of Plenty District Council $70,500.00 $70,000.00 Alzheimers Soc Eastern Bay of Plenty Inc Whakatane District Council $27,688.00 $15,883.00 Alzheimers Soc Taupo Inc Taupo District Council $55,412.00 $20,000.00 Apanui Ki-Whakatane Kohanga Reo Whakatane District Council $60,520.00 $20,000.00 Bay of Plenty Hockey Assn Inc Taupo District Council $10,000.00 $3,600.00 Canoe Slalom Bay of Plenty Inc Western Bay of Plenty District Council $25,000.00 $15,000.00 Catholic Family Support Services Hamilton City Council $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Citizens Advice Bureau Inc - Hauraki Hauraki District Council $2,700.00 $2,329.00 Citizens Advice Bureau Inc - Whakatane Whakatane District Council $17,500.00 $17,500.00 City Hope Charities Trust Hamilton City Council $10,608.00 $4,583.34 C N I K T - Central Kids Thames Kindergarten Thames-Coromandel District Council $4,449.00 $4,449.00 Coastguard Opotiki Inc Opotiki District Council $52,158.00 $28,329.00 Family and Financial Solutions Trust Taupo District Council $5,265.00 $3,500.00 Hamilton B M X Club Inc Hamilton City Council $50,000.00 $18,811.63 Hamilton Boys High School Hamilton City Council $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Hamilton Woodturners Inc Hamilton City Council $6,000.00 $2,000.00 Hearing Assn Hamilton & Districts Inc Hamilton City Council $3,450.00 $3,450.00 Matamata Rose Soc Inc Matamata-Piako District Council $622.00 $622.00 Merrilands School New Plymouth District Council $2,839.00 $2,839.00 Morrinsville
    [Show full text]
  • Of New Zealand's Local Government
    Peter Hodder Measuring the Effectiveness of New Zealand’s Taken together, these results reveal Local Government an emphasis on assessing managerial activity, with less attention being paid to Abstract effective engagement with ratepayers. A reorientation of the programme to better Local Government New Zealand’s recently introduced CouncilMARK™ meet current expectations of central scheme assesses local councils’ effective management of finance government and ratepayers for improved and resources, their leadership and their responsiveness to their community well-being is suggested. communities, and enables them to be compared and the prospect Setting the scene for a quality enhancement for collaboration towards improved performance explored. Other regime Local governments in New Zealand own measures of reputation and ratepayer participation suggest that $119 billion in fixed assets, employ 25,000 CouncilMARK may be over-emphasising managerial capability staff and spend annually nearly $10 billion relative to stakeholder engagement, which may have implications (Productivity Commission, 2018, p.4). Seventy-eight local authorities, which vary for the scheme’s value if community well-being is introduced as a considerably in size, deliver about 10% of prominent measure of performance. total public services. A small proportion of spending is locally allocated compared to Keywords local government, quality enhancement, stakeholder most OECD countries, but many central engagement, reputation, localism government services rely strongly on local authorities for delivery. In response to its ocal Government New Zealand management, service delivery and asset reputation research (discussed later in this (LGNZ) has established a voluntary management, and stakeholder engagement. article), Local Government New Zealand Lquality enhancement programme – This article compares the results of developed a ‘Local Government Excellence CouncilMARK – for local authorities in this assessment for the participating Programme’, of which CouncilMARK is a New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil and Political Rights
    Chapter Seven Civil and political rights What’s in this chapter? Te Tiriti o Waitangi/ Treaty of Waitangi Community involvement in council decision making Voter turnout Representation on local decision making bodies 144 I Quality of Life in Twelve of New Zealand’s Cities 2007 Introduction This chapter looks at the participation of Residents of the cities in the Auckland region generally residents in representative governance have more concerns about their level of understanding and decision making processes at local and input to their local council’s decision making. They also have lower levels of confi dence that their council and national levels. Civil and political makes decisions that are in the best interest of their city. rights are a fundamental aspect of human Voter turnout is higher for elections at the national than rights, protecting the ability of people to local level, with 80.9% turnout nationally in the 2005 participate in politics and decision making general election compared with an average of 42.5% in by expressing views, protesting, having the 2004 local city council elections. Across the 12 cities input and voting. combined, voter turnout declined slightly between the 2001 and 2004 local elections. Some details around the Why this is important 2007 local council elections were not available in time Enabling democratic local decision making is one of the for inclusion in this report. Based on preliminary results, key purposes of local government and is also important average voter turnout across city and district councils in in promoting the social, economic, environmental and the 2007 elections was 43.2% cultural wellbeing of communities.
    [Show full text]