DOCSLIB.ORG

Mauna Kea Public Access Plan January 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PUBLIC ACCESS PLAN FOR THE UH MANAGEMENT AREAS ON MAUNA KEA A Sub-Plan of the Mauna Kea Comprehensive Management Plan January 2010 Prepared for: Office of Mauna Kea Management University of Hawai‘i-Hilo 200 W. Kawili Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Prepared by: Sustainable Resources Group Intn’l, Inc. Island Planning Island Transitions, LLC 111 Hekili Street, Suite A373 1405 Waianuenue Avenue P.O. Box 202 Kailua, HI 96734 Hilo, HI 96720 Pa‘auilo, HI 96776 Acknowledgements The Public Access Plan was funded by the Office of Mauna Kea Management (OMKM). Interim Director Stephanie Nagata was instrumental in setting up and overseeing all aspects of the contract with Sustainable Resources Group Intn’l Inc (SRGII). She provided critical reviews of plan drafts and insight to the operational history and current policies that have shaped activities in the UH Management Areas on Mauna Kea over the years. Ms. Nagata and her assistant, Dawn Pamarang, were of great assistance throughout the project. Special appreciation is due to several groups and individuals. Members of Kahu Kū Mauna generously contributed their time as a group and in subcommittee and roundtable discussions to assist in this planning process. David Byrne, Visitor Information Station (VIS) Supervisor, was readily available and enabled his staff to meet with the planners, resulting in better understanding of the ranger program, daily operations at the VIS and appreciation of how the current management of public use on the mountain has evolved over the years. The Mauna Kea Rangers, both past and present, shared quality data, observations, suggestions and concerns that can only come from daily interactions with the public on Mauna Kea. Ron Koehler and his staff at Mauna Kea Observatories Support Services (MKSS), also provided essential insight into what it takes to safely accommodate public activities and maintain infrastructure in the challenging environment atop Hawai‘i’s highest peak. A list of plan participants is in Appendix C. Each of these nearly 100 individuals helped in a variety of ways: some participated in in-depth interviews; others attended structured roundtable discussions; and others responded whenever there were special needs or requests. Collectively this group served as the “brain trust” for the plan and each has contributed positively to the final outcome. Special thanks are due to Ron Terry whose commitment to good planning and resource protection on Mauna Kea is important to this and other recent planning efforts surrounding the Mauna Kea Comprehensive Management Plan. Steve McPeek provided excellent facilitation services for the roundtable discussions. Mahalo nui to Kirk Pu‘uohau-Pummill of Gemini Observatory who shared many of the quality photographs in the document, including the cover image. Other photographs were provided by individual rangers, OMKM and Lisa Hadway. Last but not least, this plan was inspired by ka ‘āina Mauna Kea itself. It was written with respect and recognition of the remarkable physical, cultural and spiritual values of this wahi pana, legendary place, so beloved by all who contributed to the plan. Mahalo nui loa! Mauna Kea Public Access Plan January 2010 Executive Summary This Public Access Plan (PAP) is a sub-plan of the Mauna Kea Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP). It was required as a condition of approval of the CMP by the Hawai‘i State Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) in April 2009. The purpose of the PAP is to provide guidance to the University of Hawai‘i (UH) in addressing public access in full cooperation with DLNR’s authority over public access and activities within the UH Management Areas, including the Mauna Kea Science Reserve, Summit Access Road, and mid-level facilities at Hale Pōhaku. The objective of the PAP is to provide a set of principles and policies to guide the University in the development of management actions relating to public and commercial activities and eventual administrative rules that will be subject to review and approval of BLNR.. The PAP also discusses current and future public and commercial activities in the UH Management Areas; terms of the lease with regards to public hunting, recreational activities and existing trails; public access-related issues; and makes recommendations regarding those issues. The University is responsible for the UH Management Areas on Mauna Kea under the terms of its lease agreements with BLNR. This responsibility includes the obligation to protect the natural, cultural and scientific resources on the lands leased from the State, and to work with the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to ensure that the rich heritage of Mauna Kea is preserved for future generations. The University’s challenge lies in balancing the public’s right to access Mauna Kea while protecting its natural, cultural and scientific resources, responsibly managing its use, and protecting public health and safety. Key tenets of the Plan are: Public Resource The UH Management Areas on Mauna Kea are part of the Public Land Trust, and the State and UH hold these lands in trust for Native Hawaiians and the general public. Health and Safety The protection of public health and safety is of utmost importance to UH as manager of these public lands. Education The most effective management tool is the ability of each individual to take responsibility for his/her own actions and to be open to learning new behaviors. An informed public is best prepared to make good decisions and act responsibly. Traditional and Customary Rights The ability of Native Hawaiians to exercise their traditional and customary rights in the UH Management Areas is legally and constitutionally protected and subject to reasonable regulation of such rights as permitted by law. Adaptive Management Management decisions will be based on reliable data. Management actions will be adapted as lessons are learned from the outcomes of past and current management activities. Mauna Kea Public Access Plan January 2010 i Management Methods and Authority UH has the responsibility to adopt formal rules to manage public activities in the UH Management Areas, subject to review and approval of the BLNR. A range of management control methods will be used, with compliance first sought at the lowest levels of control. The Public Access Plan is organized into seven main sections: Section 1. Introduction Provides background, purpose and objective of the PAP; its relationship to the Mauna Kea CMP and other planning efforts; the PAP’s methodology; and highlights selected laws related to public access rights on public lands. Section 2. Description of Planning Area Describes the planning area geographically, its surrounding land owners and land use designations, and the UH and DLNR management entities involved. Summarizes the regulatory environment; describes the planning area’s infrastructure and important natural, cultural and scientific resources; highlights selected laws relevant to Native Hawaiian traditional and customary rights on Mauna Kea; and describes key health and safety concerns. Section 3. Summary of Public Activities Provides a brief history of public activities in the planning area; describes data sources and collection methods used; and describes what is currently known about the activity levels and impacts of the various user groups in the planning area. Section 4. Public Access Control Methods Describes the range of public access control methods currently available and used in the UH Management Areas, ranging from personal responsibility and education at the lowest levels of control, to higher levels in the form of contractual requirements and situational control, to collaborative and primary law enforcement at the highest level. Section 5. Principles and Policies Identifies a set of principles and supporting policies intended to guide the development of management actions relating to public and commercial activities and future administrative rules to be adopted for the UH Management Areas. Section 6. Issues and Recommendations Details the key public access-related issues that were identified by participants in the planning process and, for UH consideration, makes recommendations regarding the issues based on suggestions received as well as from other sources of information. Section 7. Public Access Management Plan Updates Recommends reviews and updates of the Public Access Plan every five years as part of the evaluation and revision process for the Mauna Kea CMP. Mauna Kea Public Access Plan January 2010 ii A list cross-referencing Mauna Kea CMP management actions to related sections in the Public Access Plan is provided in Table 1 to aid managers tasked with implementing both plans. The sections listed in the table provide background information related to, or other pertinent information in support of, the Mauna Kea CMP management actions. Table 1. Mauna Kea CMP Management Actions Cross-Referenced to the Public Access Plan PAP Mauna Kea CMP Management Action Section CMP Section 7.1.1: Native Hawaiian Cultural Resources Management CR-1 Kahu Kū Mauna shall work with families with lineal and historical connections to Mauna 2.3, 3.3.9, Kea, kūpuna, cultural practitioners, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs and other Native 5.2, 6.1, 6.2, Hawaiian groups, including the Mauna Kea Management Board’s Hawaiian Culture 6.3, 6.8 Committee, toward the development of appropriate procedures and protocols regarding cultural issues. Conduct educational efforts to generate public awareness about the importance of 3.3.5, 4.2, CR-3 preserving the cultural landscape. 5.2, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 Cultural Practices Develop and adopt guidelines for the culturally appropriate placement and removal of 3.3.9, 5.2, CR-5 offerings. 6.1, 6.3, 6.8 Develop and adopt guidelines for the visitation and use of ancient shrines. 2.7.2, 2.7.3, CR-6 3.3.9, 5.2, 6.1, 6.3, 6.8 A management policy for the culturally appropriateness of building ahu or “stacking of 3.3.9, 6.3, CR-9 rocks” will need to be developed by Kahu Kū Mauna who may consider similar policies 6.8 adopted by Hawai’i Volcanoes National Park.
Recommended publications
  • Life in Mauna Kea's Alpine Desert

    Life in Mauna Kea's Alpine Desert

    Life in Mauna Kea’s by Mike Richardson Alpine Desert Lycosa wolf spiders, a centipede that preys on moribund insects that are blown to the summit, and the unique, flightless wekiu bug. A candidate for federal listing as an endangered species, the wekiu bug was first discovered in 1979 by entomologists on Pu‘u Wekiu, the summit cinder cone. “Wekiu” is Hawaiian for “topmost” or “summit.” The wekiu bug belongs to the family Lygaeidae within the order of insects known as Heteroptera (true bugs). Most of the 26 endemic Hawaiian Nysius species use a tube-like beak to feed on native plant seed heads, but the wekiu bug uses its beak to suck the hemolymph (blood) from other insects. High above the sunny beaches, rocky coastline, Excluding its close relative Nysius a‘a on the nearby Mauna Loa, the wekiu bug and lush, tropical forests of the Big Island of Hawai‘i differs from all the world’s 106 Nysius lies a unique environment unknown even to many species in its predatory habits and unusual physical characteristics. The bug residents. The harsh, barren, cold alpine desert is so possesses nearly microscopically small hostile that it may appear devoid of life. However, a wings and has the longest, thinnest legs few species existing nowhere else have formed a pre- and the most elongated head of any Lygaeid bug in the world. carious ecosystem-in-miniature of insects, spiders, The wekiu bug, about the size of a other arthropods, and simple plants and lichens. Wel­ grain of rice, is most often found under rocks and cinders where it preys diur­ come to the summit of Mauna Kea! nally (during daylight) on insects and Rising 13,796 feet (4,205 meters) dependent) community of arthropods even birds that are blown up from lower above sea level, Mauna Kea is the was uncovered at the summit.
  • Determining the Depths of Magma Chambers Beneath Hawaiian Volcanoes

    Determining the Depths of Magma Chambers Beneath Hawaiian Volcanoes

    Determining the Depths of Magma Chambers beneath Hawaiian Volcanoes using Petrological Methods Senior Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Science Degree At The Ohio State University By Andrew Thompson The Ohio State University 2014 Approved by Michael Barton, Advisor School of Earth Sciences Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................4 Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 Geologic Setting .......................................................................................... 6 Methods Filtering ............................................................................................ 9 CIPW Normalization ............................................................................. 11 Classification .................................................................................... 12 Results Kilauea ............................................................................................ 14 Mauna Kea ........................................................................................ 18 Mauna Loa ........................................................................................ 20 Loihi ............................................................................ ................... 23 Discussion ................................................................................................
  • Mauna Loa Reconnaissance 2003

    Mauna Loa Reconnaissance 2003

    “Giant of the Pacific” Mauna Loa Reconnaissance 2003 Plan of encampment on Mauna Loa summit illustrated by C. Wilkes, Engraved by N. Gimbrede (Wilkes 1845; vol. IV:155) Prepared by Dennis Dougherty B.A., Project Director Edited by J. Moniz-Nakamura, Ph. D. Principal Investigator Pacific Island Cluster Publications in Anthropology #4 National Park Service Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park Department of the Interior 2004 “Giant of the Pacific” Mauna Loa Reconnaissance 2003 Prepared by Dennis Dougherty, B.A. Edited by J. Moniz-Nakamura, Ph.D. National Park Service Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park P.O. Box 52 Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 November, 2004 Mauna Loa Reconnaissance 2003 Executive Summary and Acknowledgements The Mauna Loa Reconnaissance project was designed to generate archival and inventory/survey level recordation for previously known and unknown cultural resources within the high elevation zones (montane, sub-alpine, and alpine) of Mauna Loa. Field survey efforts included collecting GPS data at sites, preparing detailed site plan maps and feature descriptions, providing site assessment and National Register eligibility, and integrating the collected data into existing site data bases within the CRM Division at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (HAVO). Project implementation included both pedestrian transects and aerial transects to accomplish field survey components and included both NPS and Research Corporation University of Hawaii (RCUH) personnel. Reconnaissance of remote alpine areas was needed to increase existing data on historic and archeological sites on Mauna Loa to allow park managers to better plan for future projects. The reconnaissance report includes a project introduction; background sections including physical descriptions, cultural setting overview, and previous archeological studies; fieldwork sections describing methods, results, and feature and site summaries; and a section on conclusions and findings that provide site significance assessments and recommendations.
  • University of Hawaii Telescopes at Mauna Kea Observatory

    University of Hawaii Telescopes at Mauna Kea Observatory

    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII TELESCOPES AT MAUNA KEA OBSERVATORY USER MANUAL Fourth Edition, April 1996 Last modi®ed, June 1997 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General : ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 1 1.2 About this Manual :: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 1 1.3 Observing TimeÐPolicy and Procedures : :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 1 1.3.1 Students and Assistants :: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 3 1.3.2 Information before Arrival : ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 3 1.3.3 Colloquia :: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 3 1.3.4 Reports to the Director ::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 3 1.3.5 Publications and Acknowledgments ::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 3 1.4 Newsletter :: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 4 1.5 Information for Visiting Observers : ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 4 1.5.1 Transportation from Hilo to Hale Pohaku and Mauna Kea Observatory :: :::: ::: :::: : 4 1.6 AccommodationÐThe Mid-level Facility, Hale Pohaku :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 8 1.6.1 Telephone Service : :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 8 1.6.2 Mail Service : ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 8 1.6.3 Library :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 8 2 VISITING OBSERVER EQUIPMENT 11 2.1 Packing Goods for Shipping :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: : 11 2.2 Transport ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: :::
  • Hawaiian Volcanoes: from Source to Surface Site Waikolao, Hawaii 20 - 24 August 2012

    Hawaiian Volcanoes: from Source to Surface Site Waikolao, Hawaii 20 - 24 August 2012

    AGU Chapman Conference on Hawaiian Volcanoes: From Source to Surface Site Waikolao, Hawaii 20 - 24 August 2012 Conveners Michael Poland, USGS – Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, USA Paul Okubo, USGS – Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, USA Ken Hon, University of Hawai'i at Hilo, USA Program Committee Rebecca Carey, University of California, Berkeley, USA Simon Carn, Michigan Technological University, USA Valerie Cayol, Obs. de Physique du Globe de Clermont-Ferrand Helge Gonnermann, Rice University, USA Scott Rowland, SOEST, University of Hawai'i at M noa, USA Financial Support 2 AGU Chapman Conference on Hawaiian Volcanoes: From Source to Surface Site Meeting At A Glance Sunday, 19 August 2012 1600h – 1700h Welcome Reception 1700h – 1800h Introduction and Highlights of Kilauea’s Recent Eruption Activity Monday, 20 August 2012 0830h – 0900h Welcome and Logistics 0900h – 0945h Introduction – Hawaiian Volcano Observatory: Its First 100 Years of Advancing Volcanism 0945h – 1215h Magma Origin and Ascent I 1030h – 1045h Coffee Break 1215h – 1330h Lunch on Your Own 1330h – 1430h Magma Origin and Ascent II 1430h – 1445h Coffee Break 1445h – 1600h Magma Origin and Ascent Breakout Sessions I, II, III, IV, and V 1600h – 1645h Magma Origin and Ascent III 1645h – 1900h Poster Session Tuesday, 21 August 2012 0900h – 1215h Magma Storage and Island Evolution I 1215h – 1330h Lunch on Your Own 1330h – 1445h Magma Storage and Island Evolution II 1445h – 1600h Magma Storage and Island Evolution Breakout Sessions I, II, III, IV, and V 1600h – 1645h Magma Storage
  • HAWAII National Park HAWAIIAN ISLANDS

    HAWAII National Park HAWAIIAN ISLANDS

    HAWAII National Park HAWAIIAN ISLANDS UNITED STATES RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION N AT IONAL PAR.K. SERIES n A 5 o The world-famed volcano of Kilauea, eight miles in circumference An Appreciation of the Hawaii National Park By E. M. NEWMAN, Traveler and Lecturer Written Especially for the United States Railroad Administration §HE FIRES of a visible inferno burning in the midst of an earthly paradise is a striking con­ trast, afforded only in the Hawaii National Park. It is a combination of all that is terrify­ ing and all that is beautiful, a blending of the awful with the magnificent. Lava-flows of centuries are piled high about a living volcano, which is set like a ruby in an emer­ ald bower of tropical grandeur. Picture a perfect May day, when glorious sunshine and smiling nature combine to make the heart glad; then multiply that day by three hundred and sixty-five and the result is the climate of Hawaii. Add to this the sweet odors, the luscious fruits, the luxuriant verdure, the flowers and colorful beauty of the tropics, and the Hawaii National Park becomes a dreamland that lingers in one's memory as long as memory survives. Pa ae three To the American People: Uncle Sam asks you to be his guest. He has prepared for you the choice places of this continent—places of grandeur, beauty and of wonder. He has built roads through the deep-cut canyons and beside happy streams, which will carry you into these places in comfort, and has provided lodgings and food in the most distant and inaccessible places that you might enjoy yourself and realize as little as possible the rigors of the pioneer traveler's life.
  • I COPV of HAWAI R SYSTEM FEB 2 3 2018

    I COPV of HAWAI R SYSTEM FEB 2 3 2018

    David LaS5ner UNIVERSITY President 1 I COPV of HAWAI r SYSTEM FEB 2 3 2018 February 12, 2018 ~..., . Mr. Scott Glenn, Director o 0 (X) c::o - ;o Office of Environmental Quality Control l> ...,, r .,., m Department of Health -rri rr, --i :z CD 0 State of Hawai'i -< < ,n 235 South Beretania Street, Room 702 r. :::i -N Oo Honolulu, Hawai'i 96813 :Z :;r.: -i:, < --i7::.,:;=;:-, rn -vi ·"":) Subject: Environmental Impact Statement Preparation Notice for Lancr' := 0 Authorizations for Long-Term Continuation of Astronomy on Maunakea Dear Director Glenn: The University of Hawai'i (UH) has determined at the outset that it will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for its proposed new land authorizations for the continuation of astronomy on Maunakea. UH will prepare the EIS in accordance with the provisions and requirements of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 343. Pursuant to HRS Chapter 343-S(c), an Agency Publication Form and Environmental Impact Statement Preparation Notice (EISPN) are attached. The EISPN includes a description of the requested land authorization and a brief discussion of the kinds of potential environmental impacts which will be analyzed in the forthcoming EIS. In accordance with Hawai'i Administrative Rules Chapter 11-200, we respectfully request that you publish this notice in the next available edition of The Environmental Notice for the public to submit comments to UH during the statutory 30-day public consultation period. If you have any further questions about this letter or its attachments, please contact Stephanie Nagata, Director, Office of Mauna Kea Management, at (808) 933-0734.
  • Hawaiian Hotspot

    Hawaiian Hotspot

    V51B-0546 (AGU Fall Meeting) High precision Pb, Sr, and Nd isotope geochemistry of alkalic early Kilauea magmas from the submarine Hilina bench region, and the nature of the Hilina/Kea mantle component J-I Kimura*, TW Sisson**, N Nakano*, ML Coombs**, PW Lipman** *Department of Geoscience, Shimane University **Volcano Hazard Team, USGS JAMSTEC Shinkai 6500 81 65 Emperor Seamounts 56 42 38 27 20 12 5 0 Ma Hawaii Islands Ready to go! Hawaiian Hotspot N ' 0 3 ° 9 Haleakala 1 Kea trend Kohala Loa 5t0r6 end Mauna Kea te eii 95 ol Hualalai Th l 504 na io sit Mauna Loa Kilauea an 509 Tr Papau 208 Hilina Seamont Loihi lic ka 209 Al 505 N 98 ' 207 0 0 508 ° 93 91 9 1 98 KAIKO 99 SHINKAI 02 KAIKO Loa-type tholeiite basalt 209 Transitional basalt 95 504 208 Alkalic basalt 91 508 0 50 km 155°00'W 154°30'W Fig. 1: Samples obtained by Shinkai 6500 and Kaiko dives in 1998-2002 10 T-Alk Mauna Kea 8 Kilauea Basanite Mauna Loa -K M Hilina (low-Si tholeiite) 6 Hilina (transitional) Hilina (alkali) Kea Hilina (basanite) 4 Loa Hilina (nephelinite) Papau (Loa type tholeiite) primary 2 Nep Basaltic Basalt andesite (a) 0 35 40 45 50 55 60 SiO2 Fig. 2: TAS classification and comparison of the early Kilauea lavas to representative lavas from Hawaii Big Island. Kea-type tholeiite through transitional, alkali, basanite to nephelinite lavas were collected from Hilina bench. Loa-type tholeiite from Papau seamount 100 (a) (b) (c) OIB OIB OIB M P / e l p 10 m a S E-MORB E-MORB E-MORB Loa type tholeiite Low Si tholeiite Transitional 1 f f r r r r r r r f d y r r d b b
  • SAB 009 1986 P15-32 Study Areas.Pdf

    SAB 009 1986 P15-32 Study Areas.Pdf

    HAWAIIAN FOREST BIRDS 15 FIGURE 9. Study areas on the island of Hawaii STUDY AREAS forests (Figs. 9 and 16). Most rainfall is derived from We established seven study areas on Hawaii (Fig. 9): a large horizontal vortex wind pattern, but rainfall dis- Kau, an isolated montane rainforest of ohia and koa tribution resembles the convection cell pattern of pre- on the southeast slopes of Mauna Loa; Hamakua, the cipitation. The top boundary of the study area lies near windward montane rainforest of ohia and koa on Mauna the inversion layer in dry alpine scrub. Below this is Kea and Mauna Loa; Puna, the low elevation ohia well-developed wet native forest (Fig. 17). Areas de- rainforest on Kilauea; Kipukas, a high elevation dry voted to sugar cane, macadamia nuts, and cattle border scrub area on the windward side with scattered pockets the study area below and laterally. of mesic forest; Kona, the diverse leeward montane The Kau study area is relatively undisturbed by hu- area on Mauna Loa and Hualalai; Mauna Kea, the man activity, as reflected in the closed canopy cover subalpine mamane-naio woodland on Mauna Kea; and (Fig. 18). Decreasing canopy cover at higher elevations Kohala, an isolated lower elevation ohia rainforest on marks the transition to subalpine scrublands. No sta- the northern end of the island. tion had more than 20% cover of introduced trees, We established two study areas on Maui, and one introduced shrubs, or passiflora. Koa-ohia forest is the each on Molokai, Lanai, and Kauai (Figs. 10-l 1). These dominant habitat in the northeast half of the study areas are mostly in montane ohia rainforests, although area, and ohia forest elsewhere.
  • Effective Aperture 3.6–4.9 M) 4.7 M 186″ Segmented, MMT (6×1.8 M) F

    Effective Aperture 3.6–4.9 M) 4.7 M 186″ Segmented, MMT (6×1.8 M) F

    Effective Effective Mirror type Name Site Built aperture aperture (m) (in) 10.4 m 409″ Segmented, Gran Telescopio Roque de los Muchachos 2006/9 36 Canarias (GTC) Obs., Canary Islands, Spain 10 m 394″ Segmented, Keck 1 Mauna Kea Observatories, 1993 36 Hawaii, USA 10 m 394″ Segmented, Keck 2 Mauna Kea Observatories, 1996 36 Hawaii, USA 9.8 m 386″ Segmented, Southern African South African Astronomical 2005 91 Large Telescope Obs., Northern Cape, South (SALT) Africa 9.2 m 362″ Segmented, Hobby-Eberly McDonald Observatory, 1997 91 Telescope (HET) Texas, USA (11 m × 9.8 m mirror) 8.4 m×2 330″×2 Multiple Large Binocular Mount Graham 2004 (can use mirror, 2 Telescope (LBT) Internationals Obs., Phased- Arizona array optics for combined 11.9 m[2]) 8.2 m 323″ Single Subaru (JNLT) Mauna Kea Observatories, 1999 Hawaii, USA 8.2 m 323″ Single VLT UT1 (Antu) Paranal Observatory, 1998 Antofagasta Region, Chile 8.2 m 323″ Single VLT UT2 (Kueyen) Paranal Observatory, 1999 Antofagasta Region, Chile 8.2 m 323″ Single VLT UT3 (Melipal) Paranal Observatory, 2000 Antofagasta Region, Chile 8.2 m 323″ Single VLT UT4 (Yepun) Paranal Observatory, 2001 Antofagasta Region, Chile 8.1 m 318″ Single Gemini North Mauna Kea Observatories, 1999 (Gillett) Hawaii, USA 8.1 m 318″ Single Gemini South Cerro Pachón (CTIO), 2001 Coquimbo Region, Chile 6.5 m 256″ Honeycomb Magellan 1 Las Campanas Obs., 2000 (Walter Baade) Coquimbo Region, Chile 6.5 m 256″ Honeycomb Magellan 2 Las Campanas Obs., 2002 (Landon Clay) Coquimbo Region, Chile 6.5 m 256″ Single MMT (1 x 6.5 M1) F.
  • Arxiv:2009.11049V2 [Astro-Ph.IM] 24 Sep 2020

    Arxiv:2009.11049V2 [Astro-Ph.IM] 24 Sep 2020

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics manuscript no. (LATEX: ms2020-0197.tex; printed on September 25, 2020; 1:02) The estimate of sensitivity for large infrared telescopes based on measured sky brightness and atmospheric extinction Zhi-Jun Zhao1,4, Hai-Jing Zhou1, Yu-Chen Zhang2, Yun Ling3 and Fang-Yu Xu∗2 1 School of Physics, Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007, China; xu [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Yunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650216, China; 3 Kunming Institute of Physics, Kunming 650216, China; 4 Henan Key Laboratory of Infrared Materials & Spectrum Measures and Applications, Xinxiang 453007, China Received 20xx month day; accepted 20xx month day Abstract : In order to evaluate the ground-based infrared telescope sensitivity affected by the noise from the atmosphere, instruments and detectors, we construct a sensitivity model that can calculate limiting magnitudes and signal-to-noise ratio (S/N). The model is tested with tentative measurements of M′-band sky brightness and atmospheric extinction obtained at the Ali and Daocheng sites. We find that the noise caused by an excellent scientific detector and instruments at 135◦C can be ignored compared to the M′-band sky background noise. − Thus, when S/N =3 and total exposure time is 1 second for 10 m telescopes, the magnitude limited by the atmosphere is 13.01m at Ali and 12.96m at Daocheng. Even under less-than- − arXiv:2009.11049v2 [astro-ph.IM] 24 Sep 2020 ideal circumstances, i.e., the readout noise of a deep cryogenic detector is less than 200e and the instruments are cooled to below 87.2◦C, the above magnitudes decrease by 0.056m − at most.
  • Minutes Regular Meeting Mauna Kea Management Board Wednesday

    Minutes Regular Meeting Mauna Kea Management Board Wednesday

    University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 640 N. A‘ohoku Place, Room 203, Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720 Telephone: (808) 933-0734 Fax: (808) 933-3208 Mailing Address: 200 W. Kawili Street, Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720 Minutes Regular Meeting Mauna Kea Management Board Wednesday, May 19, 2010 ʻImiloa Astronomy Center Moana Hoku Hall 600 ʻImiloa Place Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attending MKMB: Chair Barry Taniguchi, 2nd Vice Chair/Secretary Ron Terry, John Cross, Lisa Hadway, Herring Kalua, and Christian Veillet BOR: Dennis Hirota and Eric Martinson Kahu Kū Mauna: Ed Stevens OMKM: Stephanie Nagata and Dawn Pamarang Others: Robert Albarson, Jim Albertini, Laura Aquino, Dean Au, Madeline Balo-Keawe, Sean Bassle- Kukonu, David Byrne, Rob Christensen, Gregory Chun, Nan Chun, Vaughn Cook, Sandra Dawson, Donn delaCruz, Gerald DeMello, Richard Dods, Suzanne Frayser, Paul Gillett, MRC Greenwood, Richard Ha, Katherine Hall, Cory Harden, Inge Heyer, Clyde Higashi, Nelson Ho, Arthur Hoke, Jacqui Hoover, Stewart Hunter, Stew Hussey, Leslie Isemoto, Mark Ishii, Paul Kagawa, Mike Kaleikini, Ka’iu Kimura, Kyle Kinoshita, Ron Koehler, Randy Kurohara, Susan Law, Tim Law, Karina Leasure, Jonathan Lee, Pete Lindsey, George Martin, Tani Matsubara, Jeff Melrose, Jon Miyata, Delbert Nishimoto, Eugene Nishimura, James Nixon, Cynthia Nomura, Alton Nosaka, Derek Oshita, Tom Peek, Koa Rice, Helen Rogers, Skylark Rossetti, Gary Sanders, Ian Sandison, Bill Stormont, Leonard Tanaka, Rose Tseng, Ross Watson II, Josh Williams, Ross Wilson, Greg Wines, Harry Yada, Mason Yamaki, Miles Yoshioka I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Taniguchi called the meeting of the Mauna Kea Management Board (MKMB) to order at 9:03 a.m. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Upon motion by Herring Kalua and seconded by Ron Terry the minutes of the April 21, 2010 meeting of the MKMB were unanimously approved.