INTRODUCTION for Nine Years from 1998 to 2007, Poso District In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INTRODUCTION for Nine Years from 1998 to 2007, Poso District In CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION For nine years from 1998 to 2007, Poso district in Central Sulawesi province became the site of the most protracted interreligious conflict in post- authoritarian Indonesia. What started as a brawl between two local youths escalated first to urban riots, then to widespread killings and war-like vio- lence, before a long period of sporadic shootings and bombings. Along the way, a little known and sparsely-populated district in the outer islands of Indonesia with no recent history of violence came to global attention as one of the most important theatres of operations for the Jemaah Islamiyah terrorist network. Overall, between 600 and 1000 people were killed out of a pre-conflict population of approximately 400,000 people, and tens of thousands more were displaced amid immense physical destruction. The extent of the destruction wrought during the conflict was captured in a wry local saying, ‘Win and you’re charcoal, lose and you’re ash.’ The onset of violence in Poso coincided with the democratic transition that followed President Suharto’s May 1998 resignation, ending more than 40 years of authoritarian rule in Indonesia. Poso was not the only site to experience large-scale communal fighting during this transition—four other provinces were also rocked by episodes of violence in which several hundred to several thousand people were killed. At a superficial level, this outbreak of violence was not a surprise. Indonesia’s own history and con- temporary circumstances contributed to pessimism that unrest would accompany the end of authoritarian rule. Even as the transition began, three of Indonesia’s then 27 provinces were already gripped by long-run- ning separatist insurgencies, each of which intensified as the central authoritarian regime fell. Moreover, the previous two instances of regime change, in 1945–9 and 1965–6, had been accompanied by periods of wide- spread social violence. In comparative terms, furthermore, countries in the midst of democratization are often observed to be particularly prone to communal violence (Snyder 2000; van Klinken 2007). Equally, however, no one had predicted that the pattern of violence dur- ing the transition would be defined by large-scale outbreaks of communal fighting in Indonesia’s outer islands. Indeed it is barely possible that such a prediction could have been made, given the unfamiliarity to that point <UN> <UN> 2 chapter one of both the forms and locations of large-scale violence. Communal fight- ing had been mostly absent under Suharto’s regime, with the two excep- tions of anti-Chinese violence and, at the very end of authoritarian rule, an episode of ethnic violence in West Kalimantan province in 1997. Each eventual site of communal conflict had also been wholly anonymous in national affairs. Even within Indonesia and well after fighting in Poso had commenced, mention of my research site often elicited a puzzled stare. Moreover, the situation in Poso and these other sites of violence in fact stood in stark contrast to conditions in most of the rest of Indonesia. The eight provinces that experienced large-scale communal or separatist vio- lence encompassed just 7 per cent of Indonesia’s population (Aspinall 2008).1 Numerous other locations experienced localised low-intensity conflicts, crime like social violence or short-lived riots.2 Both Jakarta and Medan, two of Indonesia’s four largest cities, experienced massive anti- Chinese riots just weeks before the end of authoritarian rule, for example. Nevertheless, for the majority of Indonesia’s citizenry, rather than large- scale violence, the democratic transition heralded peaceful democratic participation, improved civil liberties, and a gradually recovering econ- omy following the 1997 monetary crisis. Even within Central Sulawesi province itself, circumstances in Poso differed sharply from other loca- tions. No other district experienced significant communal blood-letting. Indeed, at the very moment that war-like violence raged between Poso’s Table 1. Sites of large-scale violent conflict during Indonesia’s democratic transition. Communal Separatist Interreligious Inter-ethnic Central Sulawesi (Poso) West Kalimantan Papua Maluku Central Kalimantan Aceh North Maluku East Timor* * In 1999, East Timor province voted to secede from Indonesia, becoming present- day Timor-Leste. 1 Varshney, Tadjoeddin and Panggabean (2008:385) express this point at district level, observing that 85.5 per cent of deaths from 1990–2003 occurred in fifteen districts and municipalities comprising just 6.5 per cent of Indonesia’s population in 2000. (Their data- set excludes Papua and West Papua province.) 2 Barron and Sharpe (2008) provide one initial survey of localised violence outside of areas of high intensity violence. <UN> <UN>.
Recommended publications
  • Gender Protection Analysis in the CRS Central Sulawesi Response
    GENDER PROTECTION ANALYSIS IN THE CENTRAL SULAWESI RESPONSE Supplies provided by CRS and partners in Sulawesi. Photo by Yusuf Wahil for CRS Gender Protection Analysis in the CRS Central Sulawesi Response A study of the gender dynamics and protection risks that differently influenced men and women in the emergency response and early recovery process of the 2018 Central Sulawesi tsunami-earthquake response in Indonesia. DECEMBER 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................1 Objective.......................... ..............................................................................................................................1 Interventions and Implementing Partners................................................................................................1 Key Findings .................................................................................................................................................1 Key Recommendations .................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................... ..................................2 METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................................................2 Key Assessment Questions..........................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Integration and Conflict in Indonesia's Spice Islands
    Volume 15 | Issue 11 | Number 4 | Article ID 5045 | Jun 01, 2017 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Integration and Conflict in Indonesia’s Spice Islands David Adam Stott Tucked away in a remote corner of eastern violence, in 1999 Maluku was divided into two Indonesia, between the much larger islands of provinces – Maluku and North Maluku - but this New Guinea and Sulawesi, lies Maluku, a small paper refers to both provinces combined as archipelago that over the last millennia has ‘Maluku’ unless stated otherwise. been disproportionately influential in world history. Largely unknown outside of Indonesia Given the scale of violence in Indonesia after today, Maluku is the modern name for the Suharto’s fall in May 1998, the country’s Moluccas, the fabled Spice Islands that were continuing viability as a nation state was the only place where nutmeg and cloves grew questioned. During this period, the spectre of in the fifteenth century. Christopher Columbus Balkanization was raised regularly in both had set out to find the Moluccas but mistakenly academic circles and mainstream media as the happened upon a hitherto unknown continent country struggled to cope with economic between Europe and Asia, and Moluccan spices reverse, terrorism, separatist campaigns and later became the raison d’etre for the European communal conflict in the post-Suharto presence in the Indonesian archipelago. The transition. With Yugoslavia’s violent breakup Dutch East India Company Company (VOC; fresh in memory, and not long after the demise Verenigde Oost-indische Compagnie) was of the Soviet Union, Indonesia was portrayed as established to control the lucrative spice trade, the next patchwork state that would implode.
    [Show full text]
  • Name and Address Supplied
    CURRENT AND FUTURE DANGERS IN AUSTRALIA'S RELATIONS WITH INDONESIA ALL words and sentences in Red above and throughout this ciocament must he omitted ' from any publicly released documents. ;P1 ' I SUMMARYOF KEY ISSUES RAISED IN THIS PAPER: 1. Dangers to Australia's long-term security caused by a variety of factors influencing the course of events in Indonesia. 2. The probability of a large-scale refugee exodus to Australia within the next 3-5 years if oppression of minority groups left unchecked. 3. Recently discussions with a number of local Indonesian and overseas leaders regarding the concerns of Islamists controlling the national agenda 4. What can Australia do to help create better relations with Indonesia and to help Indonesia to be a more stable and reliable partner? 1. Dangers to Australia's long-term security caused by a variety of factors influencing the course of events in Indonesia. a. Despite the oflcial disbanding of the "Laskar Jihad" there are still ongoing & only partially restrained attacks by the Islamic "Jihad" and their trained followers in Central Sulawesi, Ambon, and North Maluku. The Islamic Jihad is a network or brotherhood consisting of numerous organizations whose goal is the establishing of Islamic Sharia Law throughout Indonesia and Indonesia becoming an Islamic State. Some of the more visionary radical elements aligned with "Jama 'ah Islamiyah " want to establish a S.E.Asian Islamic nation which would then set its goal on conquering, if necessary by force, other nations in the region, such as Australia, for Islam. To the present time these Islamic Jihad forces are acting with impunity and apparent immunity, although the Bali bombing seems to have caused a temporary halt to many of the major attacks, but in their place there has been a massive increase in the numbers of small bombings and bomb-threats throughout the country: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (COVID-19) Situation Report
    Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) World Health Organization Situation Report - 64 Indonesia 21 July 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • As of 21 July, the Government of Indonesia reported 2 983 830 (33 772 new) confirmed cases of COVID-19, 77 583 (1 383 new) deaths and 2 356 553 recovered cases from 510 districts across all 34 provinces.1 • During the week of 12 to 18 July, 32 out of 34 provinces reported an increase in the number of cases while 17 of them experienced a worrying increase of 50% or more; 21 provinces (8 new provinces added since the previous week) have now reported the Delta variant; and the test positivity proportion is over 20% in 33 out of 34 provinces despite their efforts in improving the testing rates. Indonesia is currently facing a very high transmission level, and it is indicative of the utmost importance of implementing stringent public health and social measures (PHSM), especially movement restrictions, throughout the country. Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Indonesia across the provinces reported from 15 to 21 July 2021. Source of data Disclaimer: The number of cases reported daily is not equivalent to the number of persons who contracted COVID-19 on that day; reporting of laboratory-confirmed results may take up to one week from the time of testing. 1 https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran-covid19 1 WHO Indonesia Situation Report - 64 who.int/indonesia GENERAL UPDATES • On 19 July, the Government of Indonesia reported 1338 new COVID-19 deaths nationwide; a record high since the beginning of the pandemic in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • AUP) Programme
    Delegation of the European Union ■ Indonesia EC Aid to Uprooted People (AUP) Programme The European Commission (EC) supports conflict prevention, peace and security in Indonesia through a number of instruments and initiatives. Through the "Aid to Uprooted People" programme, the EC supports internally displaced people (IDPs), refugees, returnees and ex‐ combatants to reintegrate into society. Projects to date have supported the material and non‐material needs of people affected by the social and ethnic conflicts which erupted between 1998‐2000 in the Indonesian provinces of Maluku, North Maluku, Central Sulawesi, West Timor and Central Kalimantan. Since 2005, when the peace agreement was signed in Aceh, the EC has supported the reintegration of ex‐combatants. 1. Project: PULIH provide Uprooted communities access to Livelihood and Health recovery Duration: 2005‐2007, EC co‐financing: € 1.5 million Beneficiary regions: West Timor, Central Sulawesi Implementing partner: CARE Netherlands Project description: The PULIH project aims to support 9750 uprooted families in two provinces (Central Sulawesi and West Timor) to (re)‐gain access to propriety, livelihood assets and recovered social, ‐ economic infrastructure and health. 2. Project: Maluku Recovery Programme Duration: 2006‐2009, EC co‐financing: € 1.5 million Beneficiary regions: Maluku Implementing partner: Mercy Corps Project description: A two‐year project to support the reintegration of 10,000 IDP families in 40 villages in 7 sub‐districts on Seram, Ambon, and the Lease Islands through
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Snapshot (April - May 2013)
    INDONESIA: Humanitarian Snapshot (April - May 2013) Highlights The incidence and humanitarian impact of floods, landslides and whirlwinds increased in April and May Some 220,000 persons were affected or displaced in about 198 natural disasters during April and May – an increase since the last reporting period. Floods from Bengawan Solo ACEH River inundated parts six district RIAU ISLANDS in Central and East Java NORTH SUMATRA Provinces. The floods killed 11 EAST KALIMANTAN GORONTALO NORTH SULAWESI NORTH MALUKU persons and affected up to ten RIAU WEST KALIMANTAN thousand persons. WEST SUMATRA CENTRAL SULAWESI WEST PAPUA CENTRAL KALIMANTAN The alert level status of three JAMBI BANGKA BELITUNG ISLANDS SOUTH KALIMANTAN WEST SULAWESI SOUTH SUMATRA MALUKU volcanoes has been increased BENGKULU SOUTH SULAWESI SOUTHEAST SULAWESI to level 3: Mt Soputan (North PAPUA LAMPUNG Sulawesi), Mt Papandayan (in West Java) and Mt. BANTEN WEST JAVA Sangeangapi (in West Nusa CENTRAL JAVA Tenggara). EAST JAVA BALI EAST NUSA TENGGARA WEST NUSA TENGGARA Whirlwind, despite being the second most frequent disaster event, caused a comparatively smaller humanitarian impact than other disaster types. Legend 41 10 1 Disaster Events (April - May 2013) April 2013 104 NATURAL DISASTER FIGURES Indonesia: Province Population In million May 2013 94 Disaster events by type (Apr - May 2013) There are 198 natural disaster events 50 < 1,5 1,5 - 3,5 3,5 - 7 7 - 12 12 - 43 April period of April - May 2013. 40 Number of Casualties (April - May 2013) May 30 68 117 casualties April 2013 20 May 2013 49 Total affected population 10 0 220,051 persons Flood Flood and landslide Whirlwind Landslide Other The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations Creation date: 28 June 2013 Sources: OCHA, BPS, BMKG, BIG, www.indonesia.humanitarianresponse.info www.unocha.org www.reliefweb.int.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Composite Measure of Regional Sustainable Development in Indonesia
    sustainability Article Development of a Composite Measure of Regional Sustainable Development in Indonesia Hania Rahma 1, Akhmad Fauzi 2,* , Bambang Juanda 2 and Bambang Widjojanto 3 1 Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia; [email protected] 2 Regional and Rural Development Planning, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Law, Trisaksi University, Jakarta 10150, Indonesia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 September 2019; Accepted: 21 October 2019; Published: 22 October 2019 Abstract: Sustainable development has been the main agenda for Indonesia’s development at both the national and regional levels. Along with laws concerning the national development plan and regional development that mandate a sustainable development framework, the government has issued President Regulation No. 59/2017 on the implementation of sustainable development goals. The issuance of these recent regulatory frameworks indicates that sustainable development should be taken seriously in development processes. Nevertheless, several factors affect the achievement of sustainable development. This paper investigates how economic, social, and environmental factors could be integrated into regional sustainable development indicators using a new composite index. The index is calculated based on a simple formula that could be useful for practical implementation at the policy level. Three measures of indices are developed: arithmetic, geometric, and entropy-based. The indices are aggregated to be used for comparison purposes among regions in terms of their sustainability performance. Lessons learned are then drawn for policy analysis and several recommendations are provided to address challenges in the implementation stages. Keywords: regional sustainable development index; sustainable development; composite index; regional development goals 1.
    [Show full text]
  • GATHER the SCATTERED in KAILI LAND: Pluralism, Religiosity, and Integration of Central Sulawesi Society
    GATHER THE SCATTERED IN KAILI LAND: Pluralism, Religiosity, and Integration of Central Sulawesi Society Andriansyah, Syakir Mahid Universitas Tadulako Jl. Seroja No. 1AB, Palu, 94226 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Ismail Suardi Wekke Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Sorong Jl. Klamono-Sorong, KM. 17, Klablim, Sorong 98417, West Papua e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Based on the ethnic division of the population, Central Sulawesi Province consists of 12 ethnics groups “original,” and many tribal immigrants such as Bugis, Makassar, Java, Bali, and other tribes that have implications for the differentiation of indigenous communities and immigrant communities. The diversity of the tribes is also accompanied by the diversity of their historical background, religion, and culture which might cause friction one another. Based on the existing historical reality, it is showed that the Central Sulawesi region is often hit by ethnic, economic, and religious violences with different intensity. If the diversity among the people of Central Sulawesi is not properly managed, it can lead to disintegration. This article would identify the existence of the plural society in Central Sulawesi and try to formulate the integration efforts of the people of Central Sulawesi. Abstrak: Mengumpul yang Berserak: Pluralisme, Religiositas, dan Integrasi Masyarakat Sulawesi Tengah. Berdasarkan pembagian etnis penduduk, Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah terdiri atas dari 12 etnis asli, dan banyak juga suku pendatang seperti Suku Bugis, Makassar, Jawa, dan Bali yang berimplikasi pada diferensiasi masyarakat asli dan masyarakat pendatang yang berpotensi menimbulkan gesekan antara satu dengan lainnya. Realitas historis menunjukkan bahwa wilayah Sulawesi Tengah sering dilanda kekerasan bermotif etnis, ekonomi dan agama dengan intensitas yang berbeda-beda.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Assistance for Recovery and Rehabilitation from Recent Disasters
    Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors Project Number: 52324-001 November 2018 Proposed Loan Republic of Indonesia: Emergency Assistance for Recovery and Rehabilitation from Recent Disasters Distribution of this document is restricted until it has been approved by the Board of Directors. Following such approval, ADB will disclose the document to the public in accordance with ADB's Public Communications Policy 2011. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 12 November 2018) Currency unit – rupiah (Rp) Rp1.00 = $0.000067 $1.00 = Rp14,731 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BAPPENAS – Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (National Development Planning Agency) BNPB – Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (National Disaster Management Agency) BPK – Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia EAL – emergency assistance loan MOF – Ministry of Finance TA – technical assistance NOTE In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. Vice-President Stephen Groff, Operations 2 Director General Ramesh Subramaniam, Southeast Asia Department (SERD) Directors Vijay Padmanabhan, Urban Development and Water Division, SERD Sona Shrestha, Public Management, Financial Sector, and Trade Division, SERD Winfried Wicklein, Country Director, Indonesia Resident Mission, SERD Team leaders Yurendra Basnett, Country Economist, SERD Robert Boothe, Public Management Specialist, SERD Arghya Sinha Roy, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Sustainable Development and Climate Change Department Team members Priasto Aji, Senior Economics
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia: Durable Solutions Needed for Protracted Idps As New Displacement Occurs in Papua
    13 May 2014 INDONESIA Durable solutions needed for protracted IDPs as new displacement occurs in Papua At least three million Indonesians have been internally displaced by armed conflict, violence and human rights violations since 1998. Most displacement took place between 1998 and 2004 when Indonesia, still in the early stages of democratic transition and decentralisation, experienced a period of intense social unrest characterised by high levels of inter-commu- nal, inter-faith and separatist violence. Although the overwhelming majority of 34 families displaced since 2006 have been living in this abandoned building in Mata- Indonesia’s IDPs have long returned home at ram, West Nusa Tenggara province, Indonesia. (Photo: Dwianto Wibowo, 2012) least 90,000 remain in protracted displacement, over a decade after the end of these conflicts. Many are unable to return due to lack of government as- sistance to recover lost rights to housing, land and property. In areas affected by inter-communal violence communities have been transformed and segregated along religious or ethnic lines. Unresolved land dis- putes are rife with former neighbours often unwilling to welcome IDPs back. IDPs who sought to locally in- tegrate in areas where they have been displaced, or who have been relocated by the government, have also struggled to rebuild their lives due to lack of access to land, secure tenure, livelihoods and basic services. Over the past ten years, new displacement has also continued in several provinces of Indonesia, although at much reduced levels. According to official government figures some 11,500 people were displaced between 2006 and 2014, including 3,000 in 2013 alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccination and Reiterated That Vaccination Does Not Guarantee 100% Protection Against the Virus
    Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) World Health Organization Situation Reportn - 70 Indonesia 1 September 2021 HIGHLIGHTS • As of 1 September, the Government of Indonesia reported 4 100 138 (10 337 new) confirmed cases of COVID-19, 133 676 (653 new) deaths and 3 776 891 recovered cases from 510 districts across 34 provinces.1 As of the same date, the number of people fully vaccinated per 100 population was 13.4 nationwide; DKI Jakarta reported the highest number among all provinces (56.3).2 • As of 29 August, the weekly case incidence per 100 000 population nationwide, in Java-Bali and non-Java-Bali regions were 48.6, 44.0 and 54.9, respectively. The weekly case incidence in non-Java-Bali region has remained at the level of high incidence over the past six weeks. • From 23 to 25 August, WHO supported the Ministry of Health to conduct a monitoring meeting to review the implementation of Intra-Action Review (IAR) recommendations. During the meeting, achievements in response were shared, persistent challenges and gaps were identified and recommendations for the ten pillars of the COVID-19 response were formulated (page 13). Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of confirmed COVID-19 cases reported in the last seven days per 100 000 population in Indonesia across provinces reported from 26 August to 1 September 2021. Source of data Disclaimer: The number of cases reported daily is not equivalent to the number of persons who contracted COVID-19 on that day; reporting of laboratory-confirmed results may take up to one week from the time of testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing, Land and Property Advisor to the Global Shelter Cluster HLP
    Housing, Land and Property Advisor to the Global Shelter Cluster HLP Scoping Mission Field Review Report Central Sulawesi and West Nusa Tenggara 20th– 30th May 2019 Background On 29th July 2018, a 6.4 magnitude earthquake struck off Lombok, province of West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Since then, four further earthquakes and multiple aftershocks have impacted the districts of North Lombok, East Lombok, West Lombok, Central Lombok and Mataram in addition to Bali and Sumbawa islands. BNPB estimated that 600 thousand people have been affected by the series of tremors, with over 85,000 houses listed as heavily damaged or destroyed and an even greater number mildly damaged, leaving hundreds of thousands of people in need of shelter and settlements assistance. On 28 September 2018 a series of strong earthquakes struck Central Sulawesi Province. The strongest of which measured at 7.4 and was just 10km deep with its epicentre in Donggala regency, close to the provincial capital Palu. The earthquake triggered a tsunami whose waves reached up to three meters in some areas, striking Talise beach in Palu and Donggala. The earthquakes, tsunami and resulting liquefaction and landslides have caused significant damage and loss of life in affected areas. Areas affected by the earthquake, tsunami, landslides and liquefaction suffered extensive damage of buildings and infrastructure. An estimated 65,000 houses have been impacted, with approximately 10,000 houses lost in areas requiring relocations and a further 10-15,000 houses heavily destroyed in sites that may allow for reconstruction. It is estimated that more than 35,000 households were left in need of emergency shelter support for a shorter term.
    [Show full text]