DOCSLIB.ORG

Salmon Sub-Program: Marine Currents, Nutrients and Plankton in the Coastal Waters of South Eastern Tasmania and Responses to Changing Weather Patterns

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salmon Sub-Program: Marine Currents, Nutrients and Plankton in the Coastal Waters of South Eastern Tasmania and Responses to Changing Weather Patterns Salmon Sub-program: Marine currents, nutrients and plankton in the coastal waters of south eastern Tasmania and responses to changing weather patterns Kerrie M. Swadling Ruth S. Eriksen Jason M. Beard Christine M. Crawford June 2017 FRDC Project No 2014/031 © 2017 Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN Print: 978-1-86295-890-6 ISBN Electronic: 978-1-86295-891-3 Salmon Sub-program: Marine currents, nutrients and plankton in the coastal waters of south eastern Tasmania and responses to changing weather patterns 2014/031 2017 Ownership of Intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation [and if applicable insert research provider organisation/s e.g. CSIRO Marine Research] This publication (and any information sourced from it) should be attributed to [Swadling, K.M., Eriksen, R.S., Beard, J.M. and Crawford, C.M. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, 2017, Salmon Sub-program: Marine currents, nutrients and plankton in the coastal waters of south eastern Tasmania and responses to changing weather patterns, Hobart, Tasmania, June. CC BY 3.0] Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of this document should be sent to: [email protected] Disclaimer The authors do not warrant that the information in this document is free from errors or omissions. The authors do not accept any form of liability, be it contractual, tortious, or otherwise, for the contents of this document or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. The information, opinions and advice contained in this document may not relate, or be relevant, to a readers particular circumstances. Opinions expressed by the authors are the individual opinions expressed by those persons and are not necessarily those of the publisher, research provider or the FRDC. The Fisheries Research and Development Corporation plans, invests in and manages fisheries research and development throughout Australia. It is a statutory authority within the portfolio of the federal Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, jointly funded by the Australian Government and the fishing industry. Researcher Contact Details FRDC Contact Details Name: Address: 25 Geils Court Address: Deakin ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6285 0400 Phone: Fax: 02 6285 0499 Fax: Email: [email protected] Email: Web: www.frdc.com.au In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to FRDC publishing this material in its edited form. ii Contents Tables ..................................................................................................................................................... iv Figures ................................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................. ix Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................... x Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. xi 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Methods ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Characteristics of water masses influencing Tasmania ................................................................4 2.2 Sampling sites in Storm Bay ........................................................................................................7 2.3 Baseline water quality data ..........................................................................................................9 2.4 Plankton sampling ........................................................................................................................9 2.5 Data analysis ..............................................................................................................................10 3. Results ..................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Storm Bay – general overview of conditions .............................................................................11 3.2 Sites in Storm Bay .....................................................................................................................26 3.3 Phytoplankton and Zooplankton ................................................................................................38 3.4 Detection of Neoparamoeba perurans in Storm Bay ................................................................52 3.5 Primary Production in Storm Bay ..............................................................................................54 3.6 Historical Comparison ...............................................................................................................59 4. Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 63 4.1 Physical and chemical water quality in Storm Bay ....................................................................63 4.2 Historical comparison ................................................................................................................65 4.3 Phytoplankton and Zooplankton in Storm Bay ..........................................................................67 4.4 Detection of Neoparamoeba perurans in Storm Bay ................................................................70 4.5 Assessment of the FRRF in Storm Bay .....................................................................................70 5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 71 Implications .......................................................................................................................................... 72 Further development ........................................................................................................................... 73 Extension and Adoption ...................................................................................................................... 74 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................ 75 Project materials developed................................................................................................................ 76 Presentations ....................................................................................................................................76 iii Student projects ................................................................................................................................76 Scientific papers ...............................................................................................................................76 Industry update.................................................................................................................................77 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................... 78 Appendix 1: List of researchers and project staff (boat skippers, technicians, consultants) ...........78 Appendix 2: Intellectual Property ....................................................................................................78 Appendix 3: References ...................................................................................................................79 Appendix 4 .......................................................................................................................................85 Tables Table 2.1 Longitude and latitude of sites sampled in Storm Bay, with maximum depth sampled (approximately 5 m from the bottom) at each site. ........................................................................................ 8 Table 3.1 Neoparamoeba perurans detected in Storm Bay during 2014 and 2015. Temperature and salinity at the time and depth of sampling are also shown. ...................................................................................... 53 Table 3.2. Light (PAR, µmol photons m-2 s-1), Chlorophyll (Chl, mg chla m-3) and Fv/Fm (dimensionless) at sites 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 9, depths of 10 m and 20 m (or the greatest depth if less than 20 m) on the 15th January, 10th March and 22nd April 2015....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania
    ; 97 IHE FREiNCH IN VAN DIEMEN'S LAND, AND THE FIRST SETTLEMENT AT THE DERWENT. BY JAMES B. WALKER. Prefatory Note. As the subject of the present Paper may appear to be scarcely within the scope of the objects of the Royal Society, it seems proper to state briefly the occasion of its being written and submitted to the consideration of the Fellows. Some two years ago, the Tasmanian Government—of which the Hon. James Wilson Agnew, Honorary Secretary of the Royal Society, was Premier—following the good example set by the Governments of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Now Zealand, directed search to be made iu the English State Record Office for papers relating to the settlement and early history of this Colony. The idea originated in a suggestion from Mr. James Bonwick, F.R.G.S., the well-known writer on the Tasmanian Aborigines, who had been employed for years on similar work for various Colonial Governments, and to him the task was entrusted by Dr. Agnew. Mr. Bonwick searched, not only the Record Office, but the papers of the Admiralty, the Foreign Office, the Privy Council, and the British Museuni, and discovered and co|)ied a large mass of docunu'nts rohiting to the oarly days of Tasmania. in the early jiart of this year, these coj)ics, extending over some (J4() foolscap pages, were received in Ilobart, and the ))resent Premier —the Hon. Philip Oakley Fysh—obligingly allowed me to jioruse them. I found them to be of great interest. They threw (piite a new light on the causes which led to the first occupation of this Islaiul ; gave a complete history of Bowen's first settlement at Risdon Cove and supplied materials for other hitherto unwritten — 98 FRENCH IN VAN DIEMEN's LAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Update Feb 2019 – July 2019 Contents Prepared by Kaylene Allan
    Prepared by Kaylene Allan Cat Management Officer Courtesy of Pademelon Creative Kingborough Council Project update Feb 2019 – July 2019 Contents Control of feral and stray cats ………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Results of elevated platform trial …………………………………………………………. 4 Diet of feral cats …………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Monitoring and research Feral cat density and distribution on North Bruny ……………………………….. 5 Tracking of feral cats at the Neck Game Reserve ………….………………………. 6 Monitoring of seabirds and Hooded Plovers ………………………………………... 7 Influence of feral cats and seabirds on rodent populations ………………….. 9 University of Tasmania PhD research …………………………………………………... 10 Management of domestic cats …………………………………………………………………………. 11 Bruny Island Cat By-law ……………………………………………………………………….. 11 Assistance to Bruny cat owners ………..…………………………………………………. 11 Bruny cat holding facility ………………....…………………………………………………. 11 Community engagement ………………………………………………………………………………….. 12 Views from the Bruny community ……………………………………………………….. 12 Bruny Island District School ………….…..…………………………………………………. 13 Bruny Island Aboriginal Ranger Program …………………………………………..…. 13 Future directions ………………….………………………………………………………………………….. 14 Control of feral and stray cats Since the program commended in late 2016 122 stray and feral cats have been managed from the Neck Game Reserve, Simpsons Bay and Alonnah areas. This includes 17 feral cats trapped by Bruny Farming between April and July (2019) within the Neck Game Reserve seabird colonies. Roughly half of these 17 cats were trapped
    [Show full text]
  • Population Decreases in Little Penguins Eudyptula Minor in Southeastern Tasmania, Australia, Over the Past 45 Years
    Stevenson & Woehler: Little Penguins in southeastern Tasmania 71 POPULATION DECREASES IN LITTLE PENGUINS EUDYPTULA MINOR IN SOUTHEASTERN TASMANIA, AUSTRALIA, OVER THE PAST 45 YEARS CARYN STEVENSON & ERIC J. WOEHLER School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Private Box 05, Hobart, Tasmania ([email protected]) Received 25 March 2006, accepted 4 April 2007 SUMMARY STEVENSON, C. & WOEHLER, E.J. 2007. Population decreases in Little Penguins Eudyptula minor in southeastern Tasmania, Australia, over the past 45 years. Marine Ornithology 35: 71–76. We investigated the distribution and abundance of Little Penguins Eudyptula minor at 12 known colony locations on mainland southeastern Tasmania, Australia. Surveys of scientific journals, unpublished field surveys and oral records were compiled to assess the historical distribution (before 1996) of this species within a 150-km radius of Hobart. Current status of each site was assessed by conducting surveys of the areas of historical distribution during the 2002/03 breeding season. Transects were used to conduct burrow counts, supplemented by counts of penguins coming ashore at night. Of the 12 colonies examined, four have disappeared and two have decreased appreciably in size within the last decade. Potential causes of these decreases include predation by introduced vertebrates, habitat modification and destruction and incidental drowning in recreational gillnets. Key words: Little Penguin, Eudyptula minor, population decrease, predation, human impacts INTRODUCTION the extent of suitable habitat. Housing and commercial industries are rapidly expanding into many coastal areas, resulting in the destruction Only one penguin species, the Little Penguin Eudyptula minor, or alteration of current and potential breeding habitats (Dann 1994). breeds on the Australian mainland.
    [Show full text]
  • Huon Aquaculture Company Trumpeter EIS Storm Bay MFDP
    Huon Aquaculture Company Trumpeter EIS Storm Bay MFDP Appendix K Stakeholder Consultation Document Dear Bruny Island resident, Huon Aquaculture intends to begin farming within our currently unused lease site on the east side of Bruny Island in Trumpeter Bay soon. Until now, we have been unable to farm the lease as we have not had the infrastructure to safely farm in Storm Bay. As a result of significant innovation and investment we are now in a position to commence farming at the site safely. Our plan is to place five pens on the existing lease in Trumpeter Bay in September this year. This will in effect be a “mini-lease” which will allow us to undertake rigorous monitoring and testing of our infrastructure and systems in a production setting. We will also be applying to the Tasmanian Government shortly to split the existing lease into four smaller leases and move them further out from shore. Our company is in the process of revolutionising the way we farm fish with sustainability at the core of everything we do. Included in this letter is a brochure on our future vision as well as information regarding our operations around Bruny Island. Your views are important to us and we welcome your feedback. Please contact me on 6295 8139 or at [email protected] if you have further questions or would like additional information. More information on our operations can be found on our website, www.huonaqua.com.au and our Sustainability Dashboard, www.dashboard.huonaqua.com.au. Sincere regards, Jane Gallichan Corporate Affairs Manager, Huon Aquaculture THE FUTURE OF FISH FARMING We are 100 per cent committed to investing in our business and the communities we are part of to achieve our aims.
    [Show full text]
  • South-East Marine Region Profile
    South-east marine region profile A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region June 2015 © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 South-east marine region profile: A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘South-east marine region profile: A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region, Commonwealth of Australia 2015’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Front cover: Seamount (CSIRO) Back cover: Royal penguin colony at Finch Creek, Macquarie Island (Melinda Brouwer) B / South-east marine region profile South-east marine region profile A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region Contents Figures iv Tables iv Executive Summary 1 The marine environment of the South-east Marine Region 1 Provincial bioregions of the South-east Marine Region 2 Conservation values of the South-east Marine Region 2 Key ecological features 2 Protected species 2 Protected places 2 Human activities and the marine environment 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Operational Modelling Platform for INFORMD Progress Report
    Wealth From Oceans project: Linking models to sensor networks – an operational modelling platform for INFORMD Progress report by N. Margvelashvili, M. Herzfeld, K. Wild-Allen, J. Andrewartha, F. Rizwi, J. Skerratt. CMAR, Hobart, June 2009 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 2. OPERATIONAL HYDRODYNAMIC MODELS 6 2.1. Modelling Strategy 7 2.2. Topography Data 7 2.3. Meteorological Data 9 2.4. Ocean Forcing Data 10 2.5. River-Forcing Data 12 2.6. Sea-Level Data 15 2.7. Salinity/Temperature Data 16 2. 8. Model Grids 17 2.9. Model Run Set-Up 22 2.10 ROAM control framework 23 2.11 Model output and testing 23 3. EVALUATION OF TRANSPORT MODELS 30 4. FIELD PROGRAMS 42 4.1 Gliders 42 4.2 Evaluation of Nitrate Sensor 43 1. Executive Summary This document reports first year progress made in “Linking models and sensor networks” project. The project aims at the development of operational models for South-East Tasmanian region integrating across hydrodynamics, sediment transport and biogeochemistry, and assimilating data from sensor networks and other sources. This fist year of the project targeted three key areas (1) the development of operational hydrodynamic models (2) testing and evaluating transport models and (3) field work involving trial deployment of gliders and evaluation of the nitrate sensor. The data assimilation work and the development of pilot biogeochemical model are planned to commence in the second year of the project. Operational Hydrodynamic model The success of operational modelling requires near-real time access to the data streams to force and validate models. This includes global model products, atmospheric products, river flows and assimilation-data to test and improve numerical algorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • Capture-Induced Physiological Stress and Post-Release Survival of Recreationally Caught Southern Bluefin Tuna
    CCSBT-ESC/1609/Info 01 Capture-induced physiological stress and post-release survival of recreatonally caught Southern Bluefn Tuna Tuna Southern Bluefn caught of recreatonally survival and post-release stress physiological Capture-induced Capture-inducedCapture-induced physiological physiological stress stress and and post-release post-release Capture-induced physiological stress and post-release survivalsurvival of recreationally of recreationally caught caught Southern Southern Bluefin Bluefin Tuna Tuna Capture-inducedCapture-inducedsurvivalCapture-induced of recreatonally physiological physiological physiological caught stress stress stress and Southernand and post-release post-release post-release Bluefn Tuna survival of recreationally caught Southern Bluefin Tuna FRDCsurvival FRDCsurvivalProject Project No.of 2013-15 recreationally No.of 2013-15recreationally caught caught Southern Southern Bluefin Bluefin Tuna Tuna 2016FRDC2016 Project No. 2013-15 FRDCFRDCFRDC Project Project Project No. 2013-15 No. No. 2013-15 2013-25 2016 201620162016 Sean SeanTracey, Tracey, Klaas Klaas Hartmann, Hartmann, Jaime Jaime McAllister, McAllister, Simon Simon Conron Conron and Melanie and Melanie Leef Leef Sean Tracey, Klaas Hartmann, Jaime McAllister, Simon Conron and Melanie Leef Sean Tracey, Klaas Hartmann, Jaime McAllister, Simon Conron and Melanie Leef SeanSean Tracey, Tracey, Klaas Klaas Hartmann, Hartmann, Jaime Jaime McAllister, McAllister, Simon Simon Conron Conron and Melanie and Melanie Leef Leef The InsttuteThe Insttute for Marine for Marineand
    [Show full text]
  • CSIRO Studies 1985-89
    Huon Aquaculture Company Trumpeter EIS Storm Bay MFDP Comparison to historical data - CSIRO studies 1985-89 Harris et al., (1991) undertook weekly observations at a sampling station in Storm Bay (43°10'S, 147°32'E) over a period of 4 years from March 1985 to March 1989. They provided strong evidence for the very dynamic nature and variability of the waters in Storm Bay and the strong influence of wind events in the productivity of the system: Sea surface temperature (SST) could warm by 2.5°C from the cool, windy summer of 1986-87 to 1989. Warm years were characterized by an increased north-easterly, subtropical influence and cool years by an increased south-westerly, subantarctic influence. Intrusions of subtropical water could be detected by increased salinities and very low dissolved inorganic phosphorus Phosphate concentrations in Storm Bay in the summer of 1988-89 were one-half of the concentrations measured in 1985. Winter nitrate concentrations in 1988 were also one-half of average. Total nitrogen (range 2-20uM), phosphorus and dissolved organic carbon (range 60- 200uM) concentrations in surface waters (10m depth) fell steadily throughout the sampling period. Pulses of algal growth (measured as Chlorophyll) followed peaks in the 40-day wind oscillation and resulted from the re-suspension of nutrients regenerated by decomposition in bottom waters. Surface nitrate concentration ranged from 0-4.5uM and bottom nitrate was always higher with a maximum of 8uM, surface phosphate ranged from 0-0.8uM, and Chlorophyll ranged from 0.5-8ug/l. Windy periods (such as the summer of 1986-87) were marked by high nitrate and dissolved organic nitrogen concentrations in surface waters.
    [Show full text]
  • South Bruny National Park, Management Plan
    South Bruny National Park, Waterfall Creek State Reserve, Green Island Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000 Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment South Bruny National Park, Waterfall Creek State Reserve, Green Island Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000 Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment South Bruny National Park, Waterfall Creek State Reserve, and Green Island Nature Reserve - Management Plan 2000 SOUTH BRUNY NATIONAL PARK WATERFALL CREEK STATE RESERVE GREEN ISLAND NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2000 This management plan for the South Bruny National Park, the Waterfall Creek State Reserve and the Green Island Nature Reserve has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Part IV of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970. A draft of this plan was released for public comment from 2 October 1999 to 26 November 1999. Unless otherwise specified, this plan adopts the interpretation of terms given in Section 3 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970. The term “Minister” when used in the plan means the Minister administering the Act. The term “Park” refers to the South Bruny National Park. The term "Reserve" refers to the Waterfall Creek State Reserve or the Green Island Nature Reserve depending upon the context. In accordance with Section 23(1)(a) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970, the managing authority for the Park and the Reserves, in this case the Director of National Parks and Wildlife, is to manage them in accordance with this management plan. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have assisted in the preparation of this plan by providing information and comments on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicative Storm Bay Environmental Monitoring Program
    INDICATIVE STORM BAY ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SYNOPSIS An indicative broadscale environmental monitoring program (BEMP) and a localised lease-specific monitoring program have been developed by the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) and Planning Authority (PA) in consultation with the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) and Commonwealth Scientific Industry Research Organisation (CSIRO) to monitor key environmental indicators within and adjacent to marine farming lease areas and throughout Storm Bay, south-east Tasmania. The main objective of the proposed monitoring programs is to provide an understanding of interactions between salmonid farming and the receiving environment. This is to be achieved through monitoring key environmental stressors/indicators at varying temporal and spatial scales to determine the quantum of change from the background environment of the Storm Bay region. Similar environmental monitoring programs have been implemented in other marine farming regions in Tasmania with the overall aim of monitoring the combined effects of multiple salmonid farming operations to better inform management decisions in a whole of ecosystem context. The results of this monitoring program will be used in the ongoing adaptive management framework for salmonid farming in Storm Bay. ADAPTIVE MANGEMENT Marine farming in Tasmania is managed under an adaptive monitoring and management regime. This process allows for adjustment of management framework (based on environmental performance indicators) with the aim of sustainable development. Such decisions require comprehensive environmental monitoring and the establishment of robust datasets to accurately inform regulatory bodies for effective management. This process builds appropriate environmental performance indicators (representative of ecosystem health/condition) to ensure that critical ecosystem signals are observed and acted upon promptly and appropriately through mechanisms developed in the adaptive management framework.
    [Show full text]
  • STORM BAY – OFF SHORE FARMING • Huon Aquaculture Pioneered Offshore Farming in Tasmania and We Have Been Successfully Farming in Storm Bay Since 2014
    August 2020 STORM BAY – OFF SHORE FARMING • Huon Aquaculture pioneered offshore farming in Tasmania and we have been successfully farming in Storm Bay since 2014. A significant amount of research, undertaken over many years, has informed our operations in Storm Bay, one of the roughest aquaculture farming areas in the world. • During the five-year implementation phase of the Controlled Growth Strategy, we focused on re- engineering every step in the production processes to enable us to operate in high-energy sites offshore. • Prior to commencing farming in Storm Bay we had closed down our shallowest inshore sites in the Huon River, to reduce our impact on neighbours and improve navigation and safety while reducing our environmental impact. • Huon operates five farm lease sites in Storm Bay on the Eastern side of Bruny Island, which is located within a Marine Farming Development Plan (MFDP) area. Of the five, we have four active leases, East of Yellow Bluff and four lease areas zoned Storm Bay 1, 2, 3 and 4 (SB1-4). • In 2014, Trumpeter Bay was Huon’s first active offshore lease (one pen of salmon was grown in 1995 as a trial) although this was decommissioned in late 2019 to allow for better separation between the remaining leases. • With stringent biosecurity principles applied to the farming area, each farm lease is positioned to maximise the distance between salmon production zones, thereby reducing the risk of disease transfer between year classes in the MFDP area. OFFSHORE FARMING Offshore farming for Huon means that the location must meet certain environmental conditions and that the equipment and farming practices enable farming to be undertaken safely.
    [Show full text]
  • Tricky Tassie Coast by Kenn Batt, Bureau of Meteorology, Sydney and Alasdair Hainsworth, Bureau of Meteorology, Hobart
    Tricky Tassie Coast by Kenn Batt, Bureau of Meteorology, Sydney and Alasdair Hainsworth, Bureau of Meteorology, Hobart A question that is often put to us is “Which part of the Sydney to Hobart race track is the most difficult weather-wise?” Our reply is “All things being equal, it would have to be the east coast of Tasmania, Storm Bay and the Derwent that have given most competitors, including Kenn, the most headaches in the past” So let’s have a closer look at these trouble spots: The East Coast of Tasmania (Eddystone Point to Tasman Island): There are two positions on the race track that one should stick to religiously. The first is stay at least 30 nm off Eddystone Point and the second, stay at least 10 nm off Schouten Island. What we call the 30/10nm rule. Inside of these distances, wind conditions can be very flukey (apart from wind directions from the south through the east to the north). It is hard to discipline oneself to do this at times but do it! Complex tidal and ocean currents can draw yachts in being closer than they would like to be. The navigator should be particularly vigilant. (i) Under broad westerly (NW to SW) gradient (900m) wind flow, a lee trough will usually form on the east coast of Tasmania, and affect waters up to 30 nm of the coast (Figure 1). Figure 1. Lee trough over Eastern Tasmania. (From Wind, Waves and Weather. Tasmania) However, the effects of a northwesterly versus a southwesterly can vary markedly.
    [Show full text]