DOCSLIB.ORG

Philosophia, Ethica and Aesthetica in the Far-Eastern Cultural Sphere: Receptions of the W Estern Ideas and Reactions to the W Estern Cultural Hegemony

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philosophia, Ethica and Aesthetica in the Far-Eastern Cultural Sphere: Receptions of the W Estern Ideas and Reactions to the W Estern Cultural Hegemony 【講演】 (Public lecture)“Philosophia, ethica et aesthetica in the Far-Eastern Cultural Sphere: Receptions of the Western Ideas and Reactions to Western Cultural Hegemony, ” International Symposium, Cultures of Knowledge, Institut français d'Extrême -Orient, Pondichery, India, Oct. 21, 2005. Cultures of Knowledge : Paper Inaga Shigemi Philo-sophia and aesthetica: Transcultura Pondicherry 2005 10.20. Draft as for 2005 .10.11 am.3:15 revised 31 Oct.200 & final version: fev.17.2007 Philosophia, Ethica and Aesthetica in the Far-Eastern Cultural Sphere: Receptions of the W estern Ideas and Reactions to the W estern Cultural Hegemon Shigemi INAGA International Research Center for ,apanese Studies Postgraduate School for Advanced Studies, Kyoto, ,APAN .et us begin by pointing out a plain fact. 0hile both in China and Korea the category of 1Chinese philosophy“ and 1Korean philosophy“ are retrospectively recognized as an official designation and currently used, the ,apanese academia until now does not use the term of 1,apanese philosophy.“ 0hy did the divergence take place and what was the socio-historical background for this divergence? 6ere is my first 7uestion. 8ased on this 7uery, we will then e9pand the field of our investigation onto the domain of ethics and aesthetics. This would provide us with the basic 4nowledge on the 4nowledge in the :ar-Eastern cultural sphere in the modern era. This also leads us to the 7uestion of translatability of 4ey concepts in Asian cultures and, in extension, the possibilities of Oriental philosophies must be examined. 1Possibilities“ here imply at least three 7uestions. :irst: is the 0estern philosophical tradition capable of referring to the Oriental tradition5 Second: can the Occidental academic tradition of referring to the Orient be regarded as compatible with the scheme of 1dialogue“ between the East and the 0est5 And third: In what way can the global reciprocity be attainable without being caught by the hidden desire of 1monopolizing“ the 4nowledge for the benefit of those who possess it5 1 The term ືቇ (1tetsu-gaku2= was invented by a ,apanese Nishi Amane ⷏๟(1829-1897) in 1860 as the translation of 0estern term of —philosophy.“ China accepted the same neologism ືቇ13hé-9ue“ in 1890s and the same combination of the two Chinese characters was also transmitted to Korea by 1884. The Chinese character 13hé“ is a combination of 1clear-cut“ and 1mouth“ <1bien articulé oralement“) and from which is derived the secondary meaning designating a person bestowed with wisdom in Confucian tradition. 19ue“ means a house where the 4nowledge is transmitted from master to disciple. Previously, Nishi had proposed a term of Ꮧືቇ (14i-tetsu-gaku2=, probably named after a passage by the Chinese neo-Confucian scholar, ChDu .ián-9F ๟ộᷧ(1017-1073), namely 1a person worthy of the name loo4s after the cleverness“ (8Gan 200 :89) The first character 19F“ Ꮧ corresponds to the Greek notion of 1philo-“ in Chinese. 8ut the notion of —philo2 could not survive, probably because of ,apanese preference of two-word terms in idiom formation (Habu 200 ). Etymologically the term which lacks in —philo“ may be a mistranslation as it means literally 1sophist learning“ to which Socrates opposed his idea. Het 13hA2 may also be interpreted as an abbreviated form of 1వື“ i.e. 1teachers of intelligence,“ which would be in good tune with the idea of Ifollowing faithfully the trace of one‘s master.J And yet one should 4eep in mind that Nishi was strongly impressed by the contrast between the Chinese classical Confucian learning and the 0estern Philosophy. :or him, the progress made by A. Comte‘s positivism and ,.S. Mill‘s inductive method were a revelation. To his eye, even the Neo-Confucianism of the Sung Dynasty loo4ed outmoded and remained in stagnation, as it was lacking in renewal and innovation. In contrast, the 0estern philosophy, which he absorbed while in Nederland, was perceived as ma4ing steady progress through equitable tradition of fair debates. Thus 1philosophy“ was recogni3ed by the ,apanese of the mid 19th Century as a new 0estern scholarly method which stood in sharp opposition to the Chinese Confucianism in stagnation. According to Nishi, the Confucianism is —deductive“ in its application of personal moral to the ruling of the society as a whole, whereas 0estern philosophy is 1inductive“ in its search for the truth in accordance with 0estern natural science, where Ludgements were based on observations and analysis. 8ut NishiJs pro-0estern stance was challenged by one of his colleagues. Nishimura Shigeki ⷏᧛⨃᮸(1828-1902), who also studied with Nishi in 6olland, remar4ed several shortcomings of the 0estern philosophy in the mirror of Chinese scholarship. 0hile the 0estern philosophy puts emphasis on 14nowledge“ (⍮ 13hF2=, it tends to overloo4 the —action2<ⴕ 1hEng2=- and it does not much care about —purifying the spirit“(ᵞᔃ 19iMn 9Fn2=. Thus Nishimura found the 0estern philosophy is lacking in ethical dimension Ludging from the Chinese criteria. Clearly Nishimura is referring to the Neo-Confucianism of 0áng HEng-mNng ₺㓁 ᣿(1472-1 28) who claimed that the concordance of thin4ing and doing (⍮ⴕว৻) is essential in ethical Ludgement. Nishimura‘s reserve may well be compared with Aristotle who included theoria (h theortik epistm) and pra9is (h praktik epistm) in the category of episteme. And yet, it may be fair to observe that even nowadays Chinese scholars tend to thin4 that ethical dimension (ੱ୶) is relatively lacking in the 0estern philosophical tradition (which stands in sharp contrast to 0estern accusation of Chinese lack in human right). 1-1 1 The anecdote suggests one of the cultural conflicts which occurred at the introduction of 0estern philosophy in Non- 0estern, and in this conte9t, :ar Eastern cultural sphere. In the formative years of ,apanese ImodernJ academia under 0esterni3ation from around 1880s, philosophy was first established as a university discipline. .et us have a brief loo4 at the first generation. O4a4ura Tenshin ጟୖᄤᔃ(1863-1913), ,apanese pioneer of 0estern style art historical study, was one of the first graduates from the To4yo Oniversity. 6e is 4nown to have learned 6egelian philosophy from an American professor E.:. :enollosa (18 3-1908) before his graduation in 1880. The courses for 1Indian and Chinese PhilosophyPies2 were introduced in the following year of 1881 at the department of philosophy as neighbouring disciplines to 10estern philosophy2 in the faculty of letters. The notion of 1Oriental Philosophy2 ᧲ᵗືቇ was promoted by Inoue TetsuLirQ ੗਄ືᰴ㇢(18 -1944), first recipient of the chair of philosophy. Clearly Inoue felt the necessity of supplementing 0estern discipline with Eastern traditions and he coined the term of 1Oriental philosophy2 by way of analogy. 8ehind his intention of establishing a 1synthesis of the East and the 0est,2 we may detect his nationalistic intention: The East should show that it is perfectly e7uipped with an e7uivalent of 0estern philosophical tradition and can rival to the 0est. Though his approach is critici3ed as superficial and Ludged syncretic at best, Inoue non-the-less made it clear that a passive reception of the 0estern academic discipline was not enough for an Eastern nation-state to moderni3e its scholarly outloo4 (Shimomura 196 P200 :22). Curiously, however, 1,apanese philosophy2 was absent in the curriculum proposed by Inoue, and it remains so until today. :or more than 120 years since the founding days, it seems that the department of philosophy in ,apanese university is satisfied with the triple subdivision into 0estern, Indian and Chinese philosophies. The Indian philosophy department succeeded domestic siddham studies in the 8uddhist temples (since the 9th century) and grafted to it 0estern philology of Sans4rit and Pali reading. The Chinese philosophy department maintained more or less faithfully the legacy of e9egesis of Chinese Confucian or Taoist classics, without strongly influenced by 0estern scholarship. In the meanwhile, 0estern philosophy in ,apan mainly consisted of translating important classics and e9pounding them. Though it is commonly said that 1philosophieren2 was in fashion among students of the pre-war period, 0estern style meditation or reflection did not directly ta4e root in ,apan but gave way either to the 3en 8uddhist practice or to the faith in Christianity through conversion. Predominant in the pre-war high-school study in humanities (which covered only less than R of the population) was a scholastic philology which was conducted through the reading training of 0estern original te9ts such as Descartes, Kant and Schopenhauer, not to mention Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. It may be worth mentioning that, here again, the 0estern idea of 1philology2 highly appreciated by a Nishi Amane, was surreptitiously replaced by the 4ind of e9egesis which Nishi despised in his Confucian learning. Meticulous reading of the classics and the attempt of their translation into ,apanese (which were 7uite often too difficult for the usual readers to understand) as well as the introduction of the latest 0estern contemporary outcomes constituted (and still constitutes) most of the ,apanese academic activities in 0estern philosophy department. Dialog and debate, which resided at the ideal core of 0estern philosophical tradition, were replaced by the authoritarian monolog delivered by professors from the platform of the classroom. As far as the number of chairs and students are concerned, the 10estern Philosophy2 occupied the main place in modern ,apanese academia of philosophy, and the Indian and Chinese philosophies too4 secondary and au9iliary positions. Such was, in brief, the ,apanese pre-war institutional mimicry of the 0estern scholarly department of philosophy. 1-2 In China, a ,esuit missionary, ,ulio Aleni (1 82-1649) first provided a phonetic transcription of 1philosophia2 (᢫㍳ᚲ 㕖੝) in the 17th century, without being understood by the Chinese. It was in 1898 that HEn :S ෩ᓳ(18 4-1921) gave another phonetic transcription for 1philosophy2 (᢫ᵡ↨㕖) in his translation of A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newsletter of the Centre of Jaina Studies
    Jaina Studies NEWSLETTER OF THE CENTRE OF JAINA STUDIES March 2009 Issue 4 CoJS Newsletter • March 2009 • Issue 4 Centre for Jaina Studies' Members _____________________________________________________________________ SOAS MEMBERS EXTERNAL MEMBERS Honorary President Paul Dundas Professor J Clifford Wright (University of Edinburgh) Vedic, Classical Sanskrit, Pali, and Prakrit Senior Lecturer in Sanskrit language and literature; comparative philology Dr William Johnson (University of Cardiff) Chair/Director of the Centre Jainism; Indian religion; Sanskrit Indian Dr Peter Flügel Epic; Classical Indian religions; Sanskrit drama. Jainism; Religion and society in South Asia; Anthropology of religion; Religion ASSOCIATE MEMBERS and law; South Asian diaspora. John Guy Professor Lawrence A. Babb (Metropolitan Mueum of Art) Dr Daud Ali (Amherst College) History of medieval South India; Chola Professor Phyllis Granoff courtly culture in early medieval India Professor Nalini Balbir (Yale University) (Sorbonne Nouvelle) Dr Crispin Branfoot Dr Julia Hegewald Hindu, Buddhist and Jain Architecture, Dr Piotr Balcerowicz (University of Manchester) Sculpture and Painting; Pilgrimage and (University of Warsaw) Sacred Geography, Archaeology and Professor Rishabh Chandra Jain Material Religion; South India Nick Barnard (Muzaffarpur University) (Victoria and Albert Museum) Professor Ian Brown Professor Padmanabh S. Jaini The modern economic and political Professor Satya Ranjan Banerjee (UC Berkeley) history of South East Asia; the economic (University of Kolkata)
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Philosophy: the Basics PDF Book
    EASTERN PHILOSOPHY: THE BASICS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Victoria S. Harrison | 224 pages | 11 Sep 2012 | Taylor & Francis Ltd | 9780415587334 | English | London, United Kingdom Eastern Philosophy: The Basics PDF Book Harrison The basics. This item has been added to your basket View basket Checkout. Details if other :. Start your review of Eastern Philosophy: The Basics. Syntax Advanced Search. Philosophy of language. Nathan Benmargi marked it as to-read Feb 02, Classical China philosophy starts with Kongzi and the beginning of Confucianism, about the importance of tradition, family, and cultivation of goodness ren. Would you like to proceed to the App store to download the Waterstones App? Carlo Rovelli. Dmitry rated it really liked it Jan 09, It includes study questions for each chapter, an updated bibliography, a new section on the Yijing and expanded discussion of Indian philosophies and their basis in experience. Exploring familiar metaphysical and ethical questions from the perspectives of different Eastern philosophies, including Confucianism, Daoism, and strands of Buddhism and Hinduism, this book covers key figures, issues, methods and concepts. Nash Eleena added it May 26, Rebel Ideas. It also touches on how India came into contact with China, and how Buddhism was integrated into Chinese culture, merging with the then official doctrine of Daoism. This lays the metaphysical ground for views of the self and spirituality, which is perhaps the most known in the West. All of this is quite metaphysical in nature. While there are most certain patterns across different philosophies that aggregate into a specific culture and its neighbors, it nevertheless has countless branches and quite often is not a mere deviation, but they actually oppose each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on the Life of Shao Yong Qing MING1,A
    2020 2nd International Conference on Education, Economics and Information Management (EEIM 2020) ISBN: 978-1-60595-684-8 Research on the Life of Shao Yong Qing MING1,a 1Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, China [email protected] Keywords: Shao Yong, A History of the Song Dynasty, Life, Chan Buddhism. Abstract. Shao Yong (1012-1077), a renowned philosopher of the northern Song dynasty (960-1126), was known for his scholarship on the philosophy of Changes (yixue zhexue) and Neo-Confucianism. There is often a relationship between one’s way of life and one’s philosophy. In order to deepen understanding Shao Yong’s philosophy, this paper will take the life of Shao Yong as its subject of study, and this subject will be approached by focusing on the life of Shao Yong and his study of Buddhism along with and his practice of Chan Buddhism. 1. Introduction When it comes to discussing the life of Shao Yong, there is something of a mystery. In the existing scholarship, most researchers did not identify the Buddhist influence on the life of Shao Yong. Even those scholars who accepted that Buddhism did influence Shao Yong’s philosophy, they however did not mention how Buddhism influenced him in detail. Therefore, in this paper his Buddhist background will be interpreted in its widest sense. This will lay the groundwork for how Shao Yong’s Chan Buddhism background directed his redefinition of the Supreme Ultimate. 2. The Life of Shao Yong According to A History of the Song Dynasty, an Outer Record of Master Shao Kangjie, A Critical Biography of Shao Yong and “A Neo-Confucianist of the Northern Song: Shao Yong and His Works,” We can draw an overview of the life of Shao Yong as follows: Shao’s style name was Yao Fu, his honorific name was Kangjie, and he was also called Master Peace-and-Happiness (anle xiansheng).
    [Show full text]
  • Imagery of Monks -Bodhidharma and Aṟavaṇa-Aṭikaḷ in Visual Art
    Journal of Fine Arts Volume 2, Issue 4, 2019, PP 4-17 ISSN 2637-5885 Saṅgama of Buddhism in the Asiatic Diaspora: Imagery of Monks -Bodhidharma and Aṟavaṇa-Aṭikaḷ in Visual Art R.K.K. Rajarajan* Gandhigram Rural University, Gandhigram, Tamil Nadu, India *Corresponding Author: R.K.K. Rajarajan, Gandhigram Rural University, Gandhigram, Tamil Nadu, India, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Buddhism is a creative religion in Asiatic civilization, creative in the sense the proliferation of a rich literature and visual art leading to Universal Harmony. The present article is an attempt to examine the imagery of Buddhist monks in visual arts with special reference to Bodhidharma/ Aṟavaṇa-aṭikaḷ, propagator of the Buddhist creed. Bodhidharma hailing from Kāñcīpuram lived in China to propagate the Buddhist dharma in the land of Confucianism and Taoism. The imagery of Bodhidharma is popular in Chinese and Japanese annals and visual art through the ages. Visual culture is an authoritative source to demonstrate how a personality was viewed some 1000 or 2000 years ago, e.g. the murals and fresco in the Ajaṇṭā caves that illustrate the Buddhist annals. The Buddha‟s nativity was Nepāḷa, which means his physiognomy should have been of the Mongoloid milieu. The article examines the facial anatomy of the Buddha with reference to monks that propagated Buddhism. Bodhidharma was of the Tamil stock, which means what anthropologists normally designate Drāviḍian. Āryan and Mongolian are of different genres and pigments, viz. Āryan-white, Mongolian-yellow (or golden) and Drāviḍian-black. By the way, the personality of the Mongol reflected in Vassili Yan‟s novelJenghiz Khan is corroborated while dealing with facial anatomy that is known as mukhalakṣaṇa in Indian iconographic jargon.
    [Show full text]
  • Korean Philosophy and Religions Prof. Young-Chan Ro This Course Is A
    Korean Philosophy and Religions Prof. Young-chan Ro Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Credit: 3 This course is a survey of the philosophical ideas and religious traditions of Korea including Confucianism, Buddhism, the Daoist influence, and a native belief system such as shamanism. The main thrust of the course is to find the major characteristics of Korean worldview and ways of thinking that are manifested in various forms of religious practices and philosophical issues. The ways of thinking and the system of values of Korean people are found not only in the native, folk belief system but also in the way how Koreans have transformed the foreign religious and philosophical traditions into uniquely Korean way and created “Korean Buddhism,” “Korean Confucianism,” and “Korean Shamanism,” etc. The emphasis of the course will be on finding a unique aspect of the Korean character among the East Asian religious and cultural traditions. Required Text James Huntley Grayson, Korea- A Religious History. London and New York: Routledge- Curzon, 2002 Young-chan Ro, Korean Philosophy (printed material will be available at the bookstore) Optional Texts: Charles Allen Clark, Religions of Old Korea. New York and London: Garland Publishing Inc. 1981 (Reprint of the 1932 ed. Published by F.H. Revell Co. New York) Ch’oe, Lee (ed.), Sources of Korean Tradition (vol. 1 and vol. 2). New York: Columbia University Press. 1997 (vol. 1) and 2001 (vol. 2) Requirements: 1. Participation in class including assigned readings and discussion. 2. Mid-term exam consists of several short answers and one essay question 3.
    [Show full text]
  • MORALITY and METAPHYSICS in KOREAN NEO-CONFUCIANISM1 Donald L
    MORALITY AND METAPHYSICS IN KOREAN NEO-CONFUCIANISM1 Donald L. Baker, University of British Columbia Original English version of chapter than appeared as “sinyuhak-ŭi todŏk kwa hyŏngisanghak,” in Chosŏn hugi yugyo wa ch’ŏnjugyo ŭi taerip (Iljogak, 1997), pp.1-26 A century or two from now, when future historians look back on our time, they might notice two important opposing strands weaving a woof and a warp through the fabric that is the twentieth century. This has been a century of global cultural convergence, of new technologies of communication and transportation bringing the nations of the world closer together and making possible an exchange of goods and ideas on a scale never before imaginable in human history. It has also been a century of increasing nationalism, of subject peoples demanding and winning the right to both political and cultural self-determination, of a multitude of communities each asserting pride in its own unique history and heritage. Korea is no exception. In the twentieth century the Korean people have rejected the sadae juŭi (subservience to China) of the past and now stand tall, masters of their own destiny and proud of their distinctive Korean alphabet, Korean literature, and Korean art. Yet, along with nationalism, the Korean people have also adopted internationalization. The urban architecture of modern Korea is a blend of the traditional and the imported. Korea's industrial technology has much more in common with the industrial technology of other countries than it does with the technology of Korea's past. And the modern universities on the peninsula resemble the universities of other nations more than they resemble the National Confucian Academy of the Chosŏn dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Jin Y. Park in Conversation with Erin Mccarthy, Leah Kalmanson, Douglas L
    Journal of World Philosophies Author Meets Readers/ 155 Jin Y. Park in Conversation with Erin McCarthy, Leah Kalmanson, Douglas L. Berger, and Mark A. Nathan* ______________________________________________________________________________ Kim Iryŏp: Buddhist Feminist? ERIN MCCARTHY St. Lawrence University, USA ([email protected]) As Jin Y. Park suggests in the introduction to her translation of Kim Iryŏp’s (born Kim Wŏnju, 1896–1971) Reflections of a Zen Buddhist Nun,1 Iryŏp’s life before and after becoming a monastic are not necessarily unrelated. A major figure in the Korean New Woman2 movement of the 1920s before becoming a Zen Buddhist nun, Iryŏp did not simply leave her feminist concerns at the door of the hermitage. As Park writes, her “creative activities as a writer, social rebellion as a new woman, and religious practice as a Zen Buddhist nun were paths toward the single goal of how to be fully human and thus to live as an absolutely free being with unlimited capacity” (2). Arguably, this is precisely the goal of feminism—to live fully human and free. In the following discussion of Iryŏp’s work as translated and analyzed by Park in this recent volume, I examine Kim Iryŏp’s place as a woman in Buddhism and further explore the relationship between her feminism and her Buddhism. I pay particular attention to the relationship between Iryŏp’s work and that of Hiratsuka Raichō (1886–1971), the Japanese feminist thinker who in part influenced and inspired Iryŏp’s work. In addition, I hold that while Iryŏp’s Buddhist writings may not address feminist concerns directly, a closer analysis of some of the texts translated by Park both in this volume and elsewhere3 reveal that Iryŏp’s Buddhist philosophy is, in fact, related to her previously held fundamentally feminist concerns, such as freedom and a search for authentic selfhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Neo-Confucian Perspectives on the Way 2008
    TWO NEO-CONFUCIAN PERSPECTIVES ON THE WAY YI YI’S AND LI ZHI’S COMMENTARIES ON THE LAOZI KIM, HAK ZE (B.A., KOREA UNIVERSITY) (M.A., ACADEMY OF KOREAN STUDIES) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is a result of my recent exploration in East Asian thought. For me East Asian thought is a spiritual learning for self and society. It relates equally to religions, literature, politics, and history, thereby obscuring the boundaries between them and bewildering students. Nevertheless, students find that such a characteristic of East Asian thought can turn into richness in learning. Since East Asian thinkers expressed their thought through occasional talks, letters, and poems more than explanatory philosophical works, discerning their meaning can be an exhaustive undertaking. Nevertheless, the whole process of learning in East Asian thought has been a pleasure for me. My immediate academic indebtedness in this study should be attributed to Alan K.L. Chan (NUS) and Choi Jin-Duk 최진덕 (AKS). Prof. Chan, my current supervisor, has led me here by his excellent mentorship and scholarship on Chinese tradition. He has been the strongest supporter of my research in NUS. Without his generous yet careful guidance, I could not have completed my study in NUS. Prof. Choi Jin-Duk, a traditional Korean teacher and my former supervisor, has scolded and encouraged me by his fine scholarship and passion since I met him in the Academy of Korean Studies in 1997. As a representative Korean researcher in the field of Joseon and Song-Ming thought, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neo-Confucianism of the Joseon Dynasty: Its Theoretical Foundation and Main Issues
    DOI: 10.4312/as.2016.4.1.165-194 165 The Neo-Confucianism of the Joseon Dynasty: Its Theoretical Foundation and Main Issues HaeSung LEE*1 Abstract The theoretical foundation of Joseon Neo-Confucianism, which started with the theory of the Principle and Material Force (Seongriseol), seeks for the fundamental values of all things in the universe by means of the theories of Cosmology (Ujuron) and Mind and Nature (Simseongron). The theory of Self-Cultivation (Suyangron) pursues ideal char- acter training to reach the ultimate Noble Gentleman’s (Gunja) status; then established the theory of Fidelity (Yiriron), which stresses moral practice against injustice. These theories functioned organically with the theory of Ritual Formalities (Yeseol) and the theory of Statecraft Ideas (Gyeongseron), deeply rooted in Democentrism (Minbonjuyi), in order to realize Confucian ideas as methodological indicators. The theory of Four Beginnings and Seven Emotions (Sadanchiljeongron) extended to be the theories of the Principle’s Dominance (Juriron) and Material Force’s Dominance (Jugiron). Likewise, the theory of Sameness-Difference of Human Nature and Material Nature (Inmulseong Dongiron) became the Horak debates, which formed the Neo-Confucian academic ge- nealogies of the Joseon dynasty. Keywords: Neo-Confucianism, Joseon dynasty, Korean philosophy, theory of Principle and Material Force Izvleček Teoretske osnove novokonfucijanstva korejske dinastije Joseon, ki so zakoreninjene v te- oretskem modelu načela in materialne sile (Seongriseol), vidijo osnovne vrednote vsega bivajočega v teorijah (Ujuron) ter srčni zavesti in naravi (Simseongron). Teorija samo-kulti- vacije (Suyangron) opisuje kultivacijo posameznika, katerega značaj naj bi v tem postopku sčasoma dosegel stopnjo plemenitnika (Gunja). Utemeljena je tudi na teoriji zvestobe oziroma lojalnosti (Yiriron), ki poudarja moralno prakso in si prek nje prizadeva odprav- iti nepravičnost.
    [Show full text]
  • The NAKPA COURIER a Quarterly E-Newsletter of the North American Korean Philosophy Association No
    The NAKPA COURIER A Quarterly E-Newsletter of the North American Korean Philosophy Association No. 9, February, 2016 Greetings from the Desktop Editor Dear Friends and Colleagues, Greetings— I trust you are doing splendidly and enjoying the season. In this issue of the NAKPA Courier, you are able to find the full program of the sessions on Korean philosophy at the 2016 Pacific APA meetings. For details, see the relevant section below First off, I am happy to pass on the inaugural message that Prof. Jin Y Park has sent us as new president. Dear members of the North American Korean Philosophy Association Greetings and happy New Year! I am honored to serve as president of this innovative and important organization. I thank Professor Hwa Yol Jung for his service to the NAKPA as the first president for the past two years. Professor Jung has been a model figure for Korean American philosophers in North America, especially with his emphasis on the importance of cross-cultural philosophy. I am humbled to succeed him in this important role. The organization is young, but its existence has a lot of meaning not only to Korean and Korean American philosophers but also to those who are engaged in Asian and East–West comparative philosophy. As the world becomes more globalized, both in academia and in our society, we hear a lot about diversity and inclusion. Unfortunately, more often than not, we see that the idea of diversity and inclusion remains simply talk rather than reality. I believe NAKPA can make its own contribution to make this dream of diversity and inclusion a reality in our society and academia.
    [Show full text]
  • CH'oe HAN'gi and the PHILOSOPHY of KI the Problem of Korean Philosophy
    CH'OE HAN'GI AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF KI The Problem of Korean Philosophy by UNSOK PEK M.A., Sogang University, 1996 B.A., Sogang University, 1990 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Asian Studies) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October 2003 © Unsok Pek, 2003 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be a I lowed wi thout my wr i tten permission. Department The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada ABSTRACT What concerns me here is 'how cognitive changes were made' and 'how such changes affected a cognitive agent and a community of cognitive agents, in perceiving contents.' My thesis is, in this sense, a text-based case study of cognitive changes (to say, the phenomena of Enlightenment). In practice, this focuses on a Korean writer, Ch'oe Han'gi (1803-1877)'s works and their related literature, proceeding an inquiry into his intellectual changes through reading and writing practice of Asian and Western texts mainly of philosophy and sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Korean Philosophy
    Contents Foreword ix Preface xi Guide to Romanization xiii PARTI: GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO KOREAN PHILOSOPHY Continuity and Discontinuity of Traditional and 3 Modem Philosophy in Korea Lee Seung-hwan Korean Thought: Its Development Pattern Examined 25 in the Context of Social Circumstances Pak Tong-hwan PART II: CONFUCIANISM AND ITS MODERN IMPACT Neo-Confuciarusm in the EarlyJoseon Dynasty: 43 Some Reflections on the Role of Ye Martina Deuchler • ' Jeong Do-jcon's Philosophy of Political Reform 55 Han Yeong-u vi Contents Contents vii Toegye's Creative Interpretation of Zhu Xi's Philosophy , , ^ ?ART IV: PRACTICAL LEARNING: TRANSFORMATION of Principle OF TRADITION Tu Warning An Introduction to Silhak 293 Confucianism and Its Modern Transformation in Blast Asia 95 Michael':Cl kdtt&h Koh Byong-ik Yi Bi and Practical Learning 323 The Legacy of Confucian Culture and South Korean Politics 121 SongChu-yong and Economics: An Interpretation KihlYmingWhan Dasan's View of Man 337 LeeEul-ho Confucianism and Democracy in East Asia: A Critique of 145 Samuel P. Huntington's The Third Wave Jeong Yak-yong: The Man and His Thought 357 KangjungIn Han Yeong-u The Empiricism of Choe Han-gi 373 Park Chong-hong PARTffl: THE SPIRIT OF KOREAN BUDDHISM Word and Wordlessness: The Spirit of Korean Buddhism 169 ) KeelHee-Sung PART V: KOREAN PHILOSOPHY IN THE ERA OF Wonhyo and the Foundation of Korean Buddhism > , 185 IMPERIALISM AND MODERNIZATION Ko Ik-chin , , Human Liberation in Early Modern Korean Thought 399 Seon Buddhist Tradition in Korea as Reflected in 201 Keumjang-tae Jinul's Seon The Social Thought of the Independence Club 421 SimChae+yong , v Manhae's Understanding of Buddhism 225 The Philosophical World of Sin Chae-ho Huh Woosung 441 Buddhism in Modern Korea 257 On the Concepts of "New Korea" Envisioned Mokjeong-Bae 463 by Enlightenment Reformers Lee Sang-Ik viii Contents Sin Nam-cheol's Adoption of Marxist Philosophy and ,,,, , 491 Its Korean Characteristics , , , Kimjae-hyun Ham Seok-hcon's National Spirit and Christian Thought 519 Park Joe Soon Index-Glossary 555.
    [Show full text]