Annual Review of Environment and Resources Ecotourism for Conservation? Amanda L. Stronza,1 Carter A. Hunt,2 and Lee A. Fitzgerald3 1Applied Biodiversity Science Program and Departments of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, and Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2261, USA; email:
[email protected] 2Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management, and Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA 3Applied Biodiversity Science Program and Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2258 Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2019. 44:5.1–5.25 Keywords The Annual Review of Environment and Resources is tourism, conservation and sustainable development, biodiversity, wildlife, online at environ.annualreviews.org parks and protected areas, livelihoods https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718- 033046 Abstract Copyright © 2019 by Annual Reviews. Ecotourism originated in the 1980s, at the dawn of sustainable development, All rights reserved as a way to channel tourism revenues into conservation and development. Despite the “win-win” idea, scholars and practitioners debate the meaning and merits of ecotourism. We conducted a review of 30 years of ecotourism research, looking for empirical evidence of successes and failures. We found the following trends: Ecotourism is often conflated with outdoor recreation and other forms of conventional tourism; impact studies tend to focus on either ecological or social impacts, but rarely both; and research tends to lack time series data, precluding authors from discerning effects over time, either on conservation, levels of biodiversity, ecosystem integrity, local gov- ernance, or other indicators. Given increasing pressures on wild lands and wildlife, we see a need to add rigor to analyses of ecotourism.