Arxiv:1702.04727V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 15 Feb 2017 Galaxies at Higher Mass and Luminosity
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft version February 17, 2017 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 THE DRAGONFLY NEARBY GALAXIES SURVEY. III. THE LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OF THE M101 GROUP Shany Danieli1,2,3, Pieter van Dokkum3, Allison Merritt3, Roberto Abraham4,5, Jielai Zhang4,5,6, I. D. Karachentsev7, and L. N. Makarova7 Draft version February 17, 2017 ABSTRACT We obtained follow-up HST observations of the seven low surface brightness galaxies discovered with the Dragonfly Telephoto Array in the field of the massive spiral galaxy M101. Out of the seven galaxies, only three were resolved into stars and are potentially associated with the M101 group at D = 7 Mpc. Based on HST ACS photometry in the broad F606W and F814W filters, we use a maximum likelihood algorithm to locate the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) in galaxy color-magnitude diagrams. +0:35 +0:21 +0:25 Distances are 6:38−0:35; 6:87−0:30 and 6:52−0:27 Mpc and we confirm that they are members of the M101 group. Combining the three confirmed low luminosity satellites with previous results for brighter group members, we find the M101 galaxy group to be a sparsely populated galaxy group consisting of seven group members, down to MV = −9:2 mag. We compare the M101 cumulative luminosity function to that of the Milky Way and M31. We find that they are remarkably similar; In fact, the cumulative luminosity function of the M101 group gets even flatter for fainter magnitudes, and we show that the M101 group might exhibit the two known small-scale flaws in the ΛCDM model, namely `the missing satellite' problem and the `too big to fail' problem. Kinematic measurements of M1010s satellite galaxies are required to determine whether the `too big to fail' problem does in fact exist in the M101 group. Subject headings: Galaxy 1. INTRODUCTION halos compared with satellites around the Milky Way Dwarf galaxies are the most abundant type of galaxy in (Boylan-Kolchin et al. 2011; Boylan-Kolchin et al. 2012). the observed Universe (Marzke & da Costa 1997). They The `missing satellite' and `too big to fail' problems are serve as unique cosmological probes and provide insight not unique to the Milky Way. Recent works have iden- into many aspects of the formation and evolution of the tified the `too big to fail' problem for Andromeda (M31) Universe on small scales. In a ΛCDM concordance cos- satellite galaxies (Tollerud et al. 2014), within the Lo- mology, the assembly history of galaxies is largely driven cal Group, not only within 300 kpc where environmental by the hierarchical growth of the underlying dark matter physics may be able to resolve the disagreement (Kirby structures and by the merger and accretion of smaller ha- et al. 2014; Garrison-Kimmel et al. 2014) and also for los (White & Rees 1978; Davis et al. 1985; Stewart et al. field galaxies (Papastergis et al. 2015). 2008 and references therein). Comparisons of observed As of today, the vast majority of the underlying studies dwarf galaxy abundances to predictions of ΛCDM for for the `missing satellite' and the `too big to fail' problems the Milky Way, have led to two possible small-scale flaws are based on data from the Local Group. Of course, it in the model. The first, dubbed `the missing satellite' is interesting to consider whether the Local Group itself problem, refers to the apparent discrepancy between the may be anomalous. Unfortunately, looking beyond the predicted number of dark matter satellites in simulations Local Group to discover whether the `too big to fail' and and the observed number of dwarf galaxies around the `missing satellite' problems are truly general is not easy. Milky Way (Kauffmann et al. 1993; Klypin et al. 1999; Star count surveys are only efficient at identifying faint Moore et al. 1999). A more concrete problem, namely dwarfs in the local universe (≤ 2-3 Mpc; Koposov et al. the `too big to fail' problem, is concerned with dwarf 2008,Walsh et al. 2009), as the luminosity of stars falls arXiv:1702.04727v1 [astro-ph.GA] 15 Feb 2017 galaxies at higher mass and luminosity. Dark matter with the square of the distance. Beyond 5 Mpc, galax- only simulations predict too many massive dense sub- ies are more easily detected in integrated light rather than star counts, as integrated surface brightness is in- 1 Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT dependent of distance. However, a key problem is that 06520, USA most dwarf galaxies within the Local Group have ex- 2 Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Yale Univer- tremely low surface brightnesses, and are thus difficult sity, New Haven, CT 06511, USA to observe; and the problem is only intensified for dwarfs 3 Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA outside of the Local Group. Even using telescopes that 4 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of are highly optimized for low surface brightness imaging, Toronto, Toronto ON, M5S 3H4, Canada one cannot easily push below µ ∼ 29 mag arcsec−2 due 5 B Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Univer- to systematic errors in flat fielding and the complex wide- sity of Toronto, Toronto ON, M5S 3H4, Canada 6 Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, Toronto, angle point spread functions of stars (Slater et al. 2009; ON, M5S 3H4, Canada but see Chiboucas et al. 2013, Karachentsev et al. 2014, 7 Special Astrophysical Observatory, Nizhnij, Arkhyz, Crnojevi´cet al. 2014 and Crnojevi´cet al. 2016 for exam- Karachai-Cherkessia 369167, Russia 2 Danieli et al. ples of detected low surface brightness dwarfs associated as well as F606W and F814W at a dithered position, ∼ 300 with other galaxy groups). away. The total exposure time per galaxy for each filter To address this problem, a new robotic refracting tele- was 1150 seconds. The ACS/WFC data was reduced scope was developed and built, called Dragonfly, that with the default HST reduction pipeline. is optimized to explore the universe at surface bright- Remarkably, only three out of the seven LSB galax- −2 ness levels below µB = 30 mag arcsec (Abraham & ies, DF1, DF2 and DF3, were resolved into stars in the van Dokkum 2014). When the observations this research HST ACS images. The rest of the analyses and results is based on were taking place, the telescope was com- presented in the paper refer only to the three resolved prised of an array of eight 400 mm f=2:8 Canon IS II galaxies. Merritt et al. 2016 discuss the other four unre- telephoto lenses which all image only slightly offset fields solved objects and consider them to be most likely asso- of view, forming effectively a 0.4 m aperture f=1:0 re- ciated with a background group at ∼ 26 Mpc, containing fractor. The telescope takes simultaneous g and r im- NGC 5485 and NGC 5473. Figure1 shows a panel of the ages over an instantaneous 2:6◦ × 1:9◦ field of view. The Dragonfly g−band and HST color images for each of the first target of the Dragonfly array was M101, the nearest three resolved dwarf galaxies. For each HST image, we massive spiral galaxy beyond M31 (van Dokkum et al. also show the rich collection of stars resolved with the 2014). Merritt et al. 2014 identified seven large, low sur- ACS resolution. face brightness (LSB) objects in the field of M101. All seven candidates lie within the M101 projected virial ra- 2.2. Stellar Photometry dius and assuming the distance to M101, their physical To measure stellar photometry, we use the publicly properties (color, size, luminosity and morphology) are available ACS module of DOLPHOT, a modified ver- consistent with Local Group dwarf satellite galaxies, as sion of HSTphot (Dolphin 2000). The photometry was shown in Merritt et al. 2014. carried out on each of the bias subtracted, flat-fielded, In this paper, we describe follow-up observations with CTE-corrected *.flc images produced by the STScI ACS the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Advanced Camera for pipeline. The ACS module of DOLPHOT provides a Surveys (ACS) images in the broad F606W and F814W set of pre-processing utilities including bad column and for all seven dwarfs, to generate Color-Magnitude Di- hot pixel masking, cosmic-ray rejection, sky determina- agrams (CMDs) from which to establish membership tion and images alignment. These pre-processing steps based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) are followed by Point Spread Function (PSF) fitting method. The primary goal of the observation is to mea- photometry with model TinyTim PSFs, generated by sure distances to the seven dwarfs and to test whether DOLPHOT. DOLPHOT parameters were set as recom- they are members of the M101 group. Using the determi- mended in the manual for ACS/WFC data. Three of nation of M101 group companionship and considering the the parameters which had the strongest influence on the extremely low limiting surface brightness in the reduced resulted photometry were the sky fitting parameter (Fit- images, our results shed some light on the possible `miss- Sky), the aperture radius (RAper) and the Force1 pa- ing satellite' and `too big to fail' problems in the context rameter which forces all sources detected to be fitted as of the M101 group. stars. These parameters were extensively studied by the ACS Nearby Galaxy Survey Treasury program (Dalcan- 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION ton et al. 2009) for crowded regions and we adopted their 2.1. HST Observations values (FitSky=3, RAper=10 pixels and Force1=1. See Establishing group membership requires accurate dis- the DOLPHOT manual and Dalcanton et al.