DOCSLIB.ORG

Handbook on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Armed Forces Personnel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Handbook on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Armed Forces Personnel Handbook on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Handbookof Armed on ForcesHuman Personnel Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Armed Forces Personnel ODIHR Published by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Al. Ujazdowskie 19 00-557 Warsaw Poland www.osce.org/odihr © OSCE/ODIHR 2008 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE/ODIHR as the source. ISBN 978-83-60190-53-1 Designed by Nona Reuter Printed in Poland by Agencja Karo Handbook on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Armed Forces Personnel Acknowledgements This manual was written by Prof. Ian Leigh of the Durham University Human Rights Cen- tre (United Kingdom) and Dr. Hans Born of the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces (Switzerland), with the assistance of Ms. Cecilia Lazzarini (DCAF) and Mr. Ian Clements (Durham University). ODIHR and DCAF express their gratitude to the governments of Germany and Romania for hosting the roundtable events “Citizen in Uniform: Implementing Human Rights in the Armed Forces” and “Military Unions and Associations”, respectively. They also thank the members of the expert review panel assembled to evaluate an earlier version of this hand- book: Col. Britt Brestrup, Deputy Commander at the Norwegian National Defence Col- lege; Dr. Nataliya Danilova, Research Fellow, Governance Research Centre, Department of Politics, University of Bristol; Ms. Allison Gill, Director, Moscow Office, Human Rights Watch; Mr. Emmanuel Jacob, President, European Organisation of Military Associations (EUROMIL); Prof. Michael Noone, Professor of Law, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, former prosecutor-general of the US Air Force; Ms. Paulyn Marrinan Quinn, SC, Ombudsman for the Irish Defence Forces; Captain Katja Roeder, Equal Rights Advisor of the German Federal Armed Forces Association; Prof. Peter Rowe, Professor of Law, Lancaster University Law School, UK; Prof. Dr. Ruth Seifert, Professor of Sociol- ogy at the University of Applied Sciences Regensburg, Germany; Mr. Irakli Sesiashvili, Director of the association Justice and Liberty, former Deputy Ombudsman on Military Issues, Georgia. Furthermore, thanks are expressed to Mr. Willem F. van Eekelen, former Minister of Defence of the Netherlands; Mr. Jos Weerts, Head of the Research Department of the Netherlands Institute for Veterans; as well as Mr. David Nowsworthy, Megan Bastick and Major General (ret.) Guy de Haynin de Brie (all at DCAF) for their useful comments on earlier drafts of the handbook. ODIHR and DCAF are grateful to the governments of Austria, Germany, Finland, and the Netherlands for their financial contribution to the development of this handbook. 5 Handbook on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Armed Forces Personnel Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms 9 Preface 11 Section I 13 Chapter 1 How to Use This Handbook 14 Chapter 2 Human Rights in the Armed Forces: Scope and Issues at Stake 17 Chapter 3 The Importance of Human Rights of Armed Forces Personnel 22 Section II 25 Chapter 4 OSCE Commitments 26 Chapter 5 International Human Rights Law 31 Chapter 6 General Constitutional Framework 42 Chapter 7 Domestic Legislation 47 Section III 55 Chapter 8 Civil and Political Rights 56 Chapter 9 Military Unions and Associations 65 Chapter 10 Conscientious Objection to Military Conscription and Service 74 Chapter 11 Religion in the Armed Forces 87 Section IV 99 Chapter 12 Ethnic and Linguistic Minorities in the Armed Forces 100 Chapter 13 Women in the Armed Forces 113 Chapter 14 Gays and Lesbians in the Armed Forces 129 Section V 143 Chapter 15 Children Associated with Armed Forces 144 Chapter 16 Preventing Mistreatment of Armed Forces Personnel 161 Chapter 17 Working Conditions 173 Chapter 18 Veterans 188 Section VI 203 Chapter 19 Human Rights Education 204 Chapter 20 The Responsibility of Commanders and Individual Accountability 209 Chapter 21 Discipline and Military Justice 219 Chapter 22 Ombudsmen 230 Annex 1. Selected OSCE Commitments 245 Bibliography 249 Selected Internet Resources 251 7 Handbook on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Armed Forces Personnel Abbreviations and Acronyms BVerfGE - Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) CAP - Civil Air Patrol (United States) CRC - Convention on the Rights of the Child CEDAW - Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women CF - Canadian Forces CSFM - Conseil Supérieur de la Fonction Militaire (Higher Military Council, France) DACOWITS - Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (USA) DCAF - Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces DoD - Department of Defense (United States) EC - European Community ECHR - European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms EEC - European Economic Community ESC - European Social Charter EU - European Union EUROMIL - European Organisation of Military Associations FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation (United States) HC - House of Commons Papers (United Kingdom) HPAT - Homosexual Policy Assessment Team of the UK Armed Forces ICCPR - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICERD - International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination ICESCR - International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights IGK - Inspecteur-Generaal der Krijgsmacht (Inspector-General for the Armed Forces, the Netherlands) ILO - International Labour Organization IOM - International Organization for Migration KMFRC - Kingston Military Family Resource Centre (Canada) LUVA - Luchtmacht Vrouwenafdeling (women’s volunteer force of the Dutch Air Force) MARVA - Marine Vrouwenafdeling (women’s volunteer force of the Dutch Royal Marine Corps) MILVA - Militaire Vrouwenafdeling (women’s volunteer force of the Dutch Army) NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization NCO - Non-commissioned officer NGO - Non-governmental organization ODIHR – OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights OSCE - Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe PRISMA - Project for Resettlement and Retraining (Serbia) PTSD - Post-traumatic stress disorder QC - Queen’s counsel SAMO - Swedish Association of Military Officers SPARS - United States Coast Guard Women’s Reserve UDHR - Universal Declaration of Human Rights UN - United Nations UNDP - United Nations Development Programme UNICEF - United Nations Children’s Fund VA - United States Department of Veterans’ Affairs WAC - Women’s Army Corps (United States) WAVES - Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service (United States) 9 Handbook on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Armed Forces Personnel Preface Armed forces are an integral part of a democratic state and society. By fulfilling their defence and national-security functions, the armed forces play a key role in enabling a security environment that allows us to enjoy the inalienable rights and freedoms to which we are all entitled as human beings. As representatives of the state structure, armed forces personnel are bound to respect human rights and international humanitarian law in the exercise of their duties. But only when their rights are guaranteed within their own institu- tion will armed forces personnel be likely to uphold these in the discharge of their tasks — both when in the barracks and during operations. Many states have had to adapt their military structures in order to respond to a rapidly changing security environment. An increasing number of OSCE participating States have transformed their military from conscription-based to a fully volunteer professional force. The role and tasks of the military are also changing, with many participating States in- volved in international peace-keeping and humanitarian missions. In addition, there is an increasing realization of the necessity for participating States to ensure democratic control over their military forces and to review their military structures with the aim of making them consistent with international human rights obligations. These changes reflect a recognition that, as “citizens in uniform”, armed forces personnel — whether they are career servicemen or -women or conscripts — are entitled to the same human rights and fundamental freedoms as all other citizens. Indeed, the cornerstone of all international human rights treaties to which OSCE participating States are bound is that all human beings, regardless of their professional situation or position in society, are entitled to their inalienable rights and freedoms. The ODIHR-DCAF project to develop this Handbook on Human Rights and Fundamen- tal Freedoms of Armed Forces Personnel was inspired by the OSCE Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security. This document, adopted by the participating States in 1994, requires states to “reflect in their laws or other documents the rights and duties of armed forces personnel” and to “ensure that the military, paramilitary and security forces personnel will be able to enjoy and exercise their human rights and fundamental free- doms”. It also requires participating States to “provide appropriate legal and administrative procedures to protect the rights of all its forces personnel”. As the world’s largest regional security organization, the OSCE is uniquely positioned to address the issue of human rights of members of the armed forces. In our comprehensive approach
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armed Forces As a Significant Actor in Turkish Foreign Policy: Refahyol Government Period in Turkey*
    Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt 74, No. 1, 2019, s. 257 - 282 Araştırma Makalesi ARMED FORCES AS A SIGNIFICANT ACTOR IN TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY: REFAHYOL GOVERNMENT PERIOD IN TURKEY* Arş. Gör. Duygu Kabak Doç. Dr. Müge Aknur ODTÜ Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi İşletme Fakültesi ORCID: 0000-0002-9341-4194 ORCID: 0000-00002-1407-7047 ● ● ● Abstract The Turkish military, which dominated Turkish domestic politics in a continuation of its coups throughout the 1970s and 1980s, also dramatically increased its interference in foreign policy for a brief period in the mid-1990s during the Refahyol coalition government. This involvement in foreign policy was evidenced in Turkey’s relations with various Middle Eastern countries including Israel, and with the EU, in addition to the extension of Operation Provide Comfort. This article investigates why Turkish military’s role in foreign policy decision-making increased at this time by drawing on three approaches: Claude Welch’s classification of “military control with partners”, Michael Desch’s framework on the relationship of civilian control to intensity of internal threats and Joe Hagan’s fragmented regime analysis. Keywords: Turkish foreign policy, Refahyol government, Civil-military relations, Civilian control, Internal and external threats, and fragmented regimes Türk Dış Politikasında Önemli Bir Aktör Olarak Ordu: Türkiye’de Refahyol Hükümeti Dönemi Öz 1970 ve 1980’ler boyunca özellikle darbeler sonrasında Türk siyasi hayatında baskın bir rol oynayan Türk ordusu, 1990’ların ortasında özellikle Refahyol hükümeti döneminde kısa bir sure için Türk dış politikasındaki müdahelesini de arttırmıştır. Ordunun dış politikaya bu müdahelesi kendini Türkiye’nin İsrail de dahil olmak üzere Orta Doğu ülkeleri ve de AB ile ilişkilerinde, ayrıca Huzur Harekatı’nın (Çekiç Güç Harekatı’nın) süresinin uzatılmasında göstermiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Forces Bill 2021 Summary
    Headline can be Armedon three Forces lines Bill 2021 Title Summary Sub-title or short context to document Armed Forces Bill 2021 – Summary Background Since the Bill of Rights 1688, the legislation making the provision necessary for the Armed Forces to exist as a disciplined force has been subject to regular renewal by an Act of Parliament. The next renewal is needed by the end of 2021. The primary purpose of these Acts is to provide for the continuation for a further period of up to five years of the legislation enabling the Armed Forces to be recruited and maintained as disciplined bodies; that legislation is the Armed Forces Act 2006.The 2006 Act introduced a single system of law and the Service Justice System that applies to all Service personnel wherever in the world they are operating. The 2006 Act was implemented in 2009, replacing three separate Service Discipline Acts that dated back to the 1950s. The 2006 Act continues to serve our Armed Forces well and subsequent Armed Forces Acts have brought the 2006 Act up to date for the contemporary needs of the Services. In 2017, in preparation for this Bill, MOD commissioned an independent review of the Service Justice System (SJS) to ensure that it continues to be transparent, fair and efficient. The review made 79 recommendations for improvement and the Bill includes provision to implement a few of these which require primary legislation. In common with other five-yearly Bills, this one contains a small number of proposals which fall outside the ambit of Service discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy Police
    Royal Navy Police An inspection of the leadership of the Royal Navy Police in relation to its investigations July 2016 © HMIC 2016 ISBN: 978-1-78655-157-3 www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic Contents Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 2. How effective is the overall strategic leadership and direction of the RNP, including the structures and mechanisms in support of these areas? .............. 10 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 10 Findings ................................................................................................................ 10 3. How effective are the oversight, governance, monitoring and assessment arrangements within the RNP to ensure investigations are effective and kept free from improper interference? ........................................................................... 24 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 24 Findings ................................................................................................................ 25 4. How well does the RNP use the National Intelligence Model in identifying strategic policing priorities that influence strategic planning and resourcing? 31 What we were looking for ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Bios
    SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES Kate Hansen Bundt, Secretary General of the Norwegian Atlantic Committee and Chair of the Board of NUPI Kate has been Secretary General of the Norwegian Atlantic Committee since 2010. She is a political scientist (MA) and foreign policy analyst with expertise on German, European and transatlantic security and strategy. She is chair of the board at NUPI (Norwegian Institute of International Affairs) since 2014, a board member of NOREF (Norwegian Centre for Conflict Resolution) since 2017, member of the CSIS Stuart Center Advisory Council since 2016 and a member of the council at Fridtjof Nansen Institute (FNI) in Oslo since 2013. Prior to her current position, she worked at NUPI from 1990-93 and she was Research Director at the Oslo-based think tank “Europa-programmet” for thirteen years. In 2009 she graduated from the executive course at the Norwegian Defence University College, were she still lectures. Kate has been member of several Government appointed expert committees on security, defence and EU-issues and she is frequently invited by the media to comment on developments in Germany, NATO, and the EU. Ambassador Sergiu Celac, Honorary Chairman of New Strategy Center, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Romania Sergiu Celac is a career ambassador who joined the diplomatic service in 1961. He served as Minister of Foreign Affairs in the first post-communist government (1989-1990), then as ambassador to the United Kingdom and Ireland, ambassador-at-large and personal adviser to the President of Romania. After retirement, he worked as president of the Romanian Institute of International Studies, alternate director general of the International Centre for Black Sea Studies in Athens and is currently Vice-President of the Romanian Association for the Club of Rome, member of the Board of the European Institute of Romania, Black Sea University Foundation, Energy Policy Group, member of the Writers’ Union of Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Defensive War of 1939 an Overview After 80 Years
    POLISH DEFENSIVE WAR OF 1939 AN OVERVIEW AFTER 80 YEARS 1939 – 2019 Alexander M. Jablonski Prologue The 80th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II brings many reflections. As a Pole by birth I had been brought up in the deep love to my home country and also to her armed forces as majority of men in my family served in the Polish Armed Forces and fought in both World Wars and in the Polish-Bolshevik War of 1919-1921. This is typical for many Polish families in the last century. World War II left a deep wound in the Polish nation. The defeat of September 1939 campaign was very special. The results of it are felt to the present day not only in every family but also in the life of the Polish nation as the whole. World War II was the largest military conflict in the contemporary world history. Military operations covered several continents and involved 61 countries and many nations. It divided the war into two fighting camps: axis forces of Berlin - Rome -Tokyo and allied forces (with some changes after 1941). The war lasted six years from September 1, 1939 (the German invasion of Poland) to September 4, 1945, marked by the surrender of Imperial Japan, and Europe by the capitulation of Germany on May 8 and 9, 1945. In different countries the beginning of this war is different and it depends on the date of actual access to the fight. The main reason of this war was the continuous German attempts to break the Versailles treaty, which established a new world and especially European order in 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • Da´Il E´Ireann
    Vol. 580 Tuesday, No. 1 17 February 2004 DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DA´ IL E´ IREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Tuesday, 17 February 2004. Ceisteanna—Questions Taoiseach ………………………………… 1 Minister for Finance Priority Questions …………………………… 14 Other Questions …………………………… 28 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 34 Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 35 Requests to move Adjournment of Da´il under Standing Order 31 ……………… 42 Order of Business ……………………………… 43 Finance Bill 2004: Allocation of Time Motion …………………… 52 Ministerial Rota for Parliamentary Questions: Motion ………………… 53 Motor Vehicle (Duties and Licences) Bill 2004: Second Stage ……………… 54 Private Members’ Business Electronic Voting: Motion ………………………… 82 Motor Vehicle (Duties and Licences) Bill 2004: Second Stage (resumed)……………………………114 Referral to Select Committee ………………………… 139 Adjournment Debate Community Employment Schemes ……………………… 139 School Closures ……………………………… 142 Hepatitis C Incidence …………………………… 144 Social Welfare Benefits …………………………… 148 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 153 1 2 DA´ IL E´ IREANN DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL OFFICIAL REPORT Imleabhar 580 Volume 580 De´ Ma´irt, 17 Feabhra 2004. Tuesday, 17 February 2004. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 2.30 p.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Ceisteanna — Questions. 5. Mr. Rabbitte asked the Taoiseach if the Government has plans for the holding of ———— constitutional referenda during 2004; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [2892/04] Constitutional Amendments. 6. Mr. Rabbitte asked the Taoiseach the 1. Mr. Kenny asked the Taoiseach the progress made to date with regard to the constitutional referenda he intends to hold during implementation of the recommendations of the 2004; and if he will make a statement on the Oireachtas committee on the Constitution; and if matter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chief of Defence Staff S.K.Sinha
    The Chief of Defence Staff S.K.Sinha India as a nation went through a very traumatic experience in 1962. Our faith in the impregnability of the Himalayas, the infallibility of our foreign policy and the invincibility of our Army, got shattered. I was then an Instructor at Staff College. I was assigned the task of preparing a Telephone Battle exercise for Staff College on mountain warfare, based on our experience in the Himalayas. I toured the battle zone in the North-East to study the terrain and the course of operations that had recently taken place there. This also enabled me to interact with some of the officers who had taken part in those operations. The tour of the battlefield and research at Staff College,led one to conclude that there were three main reasons for our debacle in the Himalayas. First, a total mismatch between Indian foreign and defence policies. Second, the loss of élan amongst the officer corps in the Indian Army. Third, an irrational higher defence organization in which the Defence Services were increasingly isolated from the process of decision making in defence matters. Vital issues of war and peace, concerning the nation were being dealt with in a casual manner. For instance, in September 1962, on his way to Colombo, the Prime Minister had issued a statement to the Press at Chennai, that he had ordered the Army to evict the Chinese from the Himalayas. The Army Chief then at Tezpur, wanted written orders to that effect. A Joint Secretary in the Ministry of Defence present at Tezpur gave him those orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Forces As an Element of National Power, and Compulsory Military Service
    Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Volume: 3 – Issue: 4 – October - 2013 Armed Forces as an Element of National Power, and Compulsory Military Service Suat Begeç, Turkey Abstract Whether military service should be done as a national duty or left to the professionals has been discussed for a long time both in Turkey and across the world. In order to answer this question and make relevant suggestions, this paper begins with the recruitment system in the Turkish Armed Forces during the history. Subsequently, armed forces of neighbor countries, their communication strategies and of those politically linked with Turkey as well as the world armies carrying weight for the scope of this study are all analyzed. Thirdly, current military service and its flawed aspects are explained. Finally come suggestions on how the military service should be. Keywords: Armed forces, compulsory military service, national army, recruitment © Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 179 Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Volume: 3 – Issue: 4 – October - 2013 Introduction Neither numbers nor technology wins in a war… The winner is always the heart. There is no might that can stand against a unit banded together. Soldiers believe that if they lose their life in a war, they will die a martyr and be worthy of heaven; and that if they survive they will be a veteran and leave unforgettable memories to his children. This belief renders them fearless. This bestows on their commanders a power that few leaders have. Power is the ability to influence people and events. Power is the ability that leaders and managers gain and enjoy through their personalities, activities and situations within the organizational structure [Newstrom & Davis, 2002:272].
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey and Black Sea Security 3
    SIPRI Background Paper December 2018 TURKEY AND SUMMARY w The Black Sea region is BLACK SEA SECURITY experiencing a changing military balance. The six littoral states (Bulgaria, siemon t. wezeman and alexandra kuimova* Georgia, Romania, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine) intensified their efforts to build up their military potential after Russia’s The security environment in the wider Black Sea region—which brings takeover of Crimea and the together the six littoral states (Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, Russia, Turkey start of the internationalized and Ukraine) and a hinterland including the South Caucasus and Moldova— civil war in eastern Ukraine is rapidly changing. It combines protracted conflicts with a significant con- in 2014. ventional military build-up that intensified after the events of 2014: Russia’s Although security in the takeover of Crimea and the start of the internationalized civil war in eastern Black Sea region has always Ukraine.1 Transnational connections between conflicts across the region been and remains important for and between the Black Sea and the Middle East add further dimensions of Turkey, the current Turkish insecurity. As a result, there is a blurring of the conditions of peace, crisis defence policy seems to be and conflict in the region. This has led to an unpredictable and potentially largely directed southwards, high-risk environment in which military forces with advanced weapons, towards the Middle East. including nuclear-capable systems, are increasingly active in close proxim- Russian–Turkish relations have been ambiguous for some years. ity to each other. Turkey has openly expressed In this context, there is an urgent need to develop a clearer understanding concern about perceived of the security dynamics and challenges facing the wider Black Sea region, Russian ambitions in the Black and to explore opportunities for dialogue between the key regional security Sea region and called for a actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Armed Forces (Offences and Jurisdiction) (Jersey) Law 201
    STATES OF JERSEY r DRAFT ARMED FORCES (OFFENCES AND JURISDICTION) (JERSEY) LAW 201- Lodged au Greffe on 6th June 2017 by the Minister for Home Affairs STATES GREFFE 2017 P.51 DRAFT ARMED FORCES (OFFENCES AND JURISDICTION) (JERSEY) LAW 201- European Convention on Human Rights In accordance with the provisions of Article 16 of the Human Rights (Jersey) Law 2000, the Minister for Home Affairs has made the following statement – In the view of the Minister for Home Affairs, the provisions of the Draft Armed Forces (Offences and Jurisdiction) (Jersey) Law 201- are compatible with the Convention Rights. Signed: Deputy K.L. Moore of St. Peter Minister for Home Affairs Dated: 2nd June 2017 Page - 3 ◊ P.51/2017 REPORT The proposed Armed Forces (Offences and Jurisdiction) (Jersey) Law 201- (“the proposed Law”) makes provision for the treatment of British armed forces and those visiting from other countries when they are in Jersey, particularly in relation to discipline and justice. The proposed Law also establishes appropriate powers for the Jersey police and courts in relation to deserters and others, creates civilian offences in relation to the armed forces, protects the pay and equipment of the armed forces from action in Jersey courts, and enables the States Assembly by Regulations to amend legislation to provide for the use of vehicles and roads by the armed forces. Background The United Kingdom Visiting Forces Act 1952 was introduced in order to make provision with respect to naval, military and air forces of other countries visiting the United Kingdom, and to provide for the apprehension and disposal of deserters or absentees without leave in the United Kingdom from the forces of such countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Officers of the Irish Defence Forces and Civilian Higher Education Since the 1960S
    Socialisation, Role Theory, and Infrapolitics: Officers of the Irish Defence Forces and Civilian Higher Education since the 1960s Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy Trinity College Dublin November, 2020 Andrew Gerard Gibson Supervisor: Dr John Walsh Title: Socialisation, Role theory, and Infrapolitics: Officers of the Irish Defence Forces and Civilian Higher Education since the 1960s. Author: Andrew Gerard Gibson Abstract: The military profession has a long history, and its institutions of education have been central to the development of military officers. Questions about the higher education of officers became increasingly important in the wake of World War 2 and the changing nature of military authority and the roles that military officers would be expected to fill. In Ireland these changes became manifest in the advent of the decision in 1969 to send Army officers to university in University College Galway. Combining documentary and archival research with data generated through semi-structured interviews with 46 retired and serving officers, it adopts a conceptual frameworK of role theory combined with ideas from James C. Scott in a case study approach to examine the origins and effects of the USAC scheme for the civilian higher education of Irish military officers since 1969. It answers the question of how officers in the Defence Forces interacted with civilian higher education at undergraduate level, and how this influenced their socialisation, professional formation, and the implications of higher education for them as individuals and for their military role. Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Implications of Possible Changes to Women in Service Restrictions: Practices of Foreign Militaries and Other Organizations
    Assessing the Implications of Possible Changes to Women in Service Restrictions: Practices of Foreign Militaries and Other Organizations Annemarie Randazzo-Matsel • Jennifer Schulte • Jennifer Yopp DIM-2012-U-000689-Final July 2012 Photo credit line: Young Israeli women undergo tough, initial pre-army training at Zikim Army Base in southern Israel. REUTERS/Nir Elias Approved for distribution: July 2012 Anita Hattiangadi Research Team Leader Marine Corps Manpower Team Resource Analysis Division This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. Cleared for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N00014-11-D-0323. Copies of this document can be obtained through the CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Copyright 2012 CNA This work was created in the performance of Federal Government Contract Number N00014-11-D-0323. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in DFARS 252.227-7013 and/or DFARS 252.227-7014. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the read-ing or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. Contents Executive summary . 1 Foreign militaries . 3 Australia . 4 ADF composition .
    [Show full text]