DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description March 2012 Citation: Newall, P.R. and Lloyd, L.N. 2012. Ecological Character Description for the Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar Site. Lloyd Environmental Pty Ltd Report (Project No: LE0944) to the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPaC), Australian Government. Lloyd Environmental, Syndal, Victoria, 2nd March 2012. Copyright © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2012. The Ecological Character Description for the Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar site is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘Ecological Character Description for the Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River Ramsar site, Commonwealth of Australia 2012’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Acknowledgements: • Chris Bobbi, Senior Water Environment Officer, Water Assessment Branch, Water Resources Division, Department of Primary Industries and Water (DPIW) • Sally Bryant, Manager Threatened Species Section, Biodiversity Conservation Branch, DPIW • Jenny Davis, Associate Professor, School of Environmental Science, Murdoch University, Western Australia • Louise Gilfedder, (Senior Conservation Scientist), Private Land Conservation Program, DPIW • Kath Jerie, Earth Science Section, Resource Management and Conservation Division, DPIW • Bronwen Wicks, Wetlands Section, SEWPaC • Anya Lam, Wetlands Section, SEWPaC • Ken Morgan, Wetlands Section, SEWPaC • John Pemberton, Senior Geologist, Industrial Minerals and Land Management, Mineral Resources Tasmania • Greg Pinkard, Manager, Land Conservation Branch, DPIW • Andrew Baldwin, NRM North • Adrian James, NRM North • Jay Wilson, NRM North Facilitator • Elisha Atchison, Lloyd Environmental Pty Ltd This project was funded by NRM North Tasmania and the Australian Government. The steering committee was comprised of the following: • Scott Schilg, Program Manager, Healthy Coasts and Seas, NRM North • Emma Williams, Healthy Coasts and Seas Coordinator, NRM North • Imogen Birley, SEWPaC • Stewart Blackhall, Wildlife Biologist, Wildlife and Marine Conservation Section, Biodiversity Conservation Branch, DPIW • Dominique Couzens, Ranger in Charge – Scottsdale, Parks & Wildlife, Tasmania • Jay Wilson, Dorset Natural Resource Management Facilitator, Dorset Council 1 Introductory Notes This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (National Framework) (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the EPBC Act, nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. This ECD Publication is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this ECD are correct, the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of the Environment does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the currency, accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the information in this ECD. Note: There may be differences in the type of information contained in this ECD publication, to those of other Ramsar wetlands. Cover photos (left to right): The Ringarooma River - Michelle McAulay, SEWPaC; Panoramic View of the Ringarooma River - Michelle McAulay, SEWPaC; The Ringarooma River - Michelle McAulay, SEWPaC; The Ringarooma River - Michelle McAulay, SEWPaC. 2 Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 6 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 18 1.1. PURPOSE................................................................................................................................................. 18 1.2. SITE DETAILS ........................................................................................................................................ 19 1.3. DATE OF DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 20 1.4. RELEVANT TREATIES, LEGISLATION OR REGULATIONS ...................................................................... 21 1.4.1. INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND STRATEGIES .................................................................................. 21 1.4.2. COMMONWEALTH LEGISLATION AND POLICY .................................................................................. 22 1.4.3. STATE LEGISLATION .......................................................................................................................... 23 2. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE ............................................................... 24 2.1 SETTING ................................................................................................................................................. 24 2.2 RAMSAR LISTING ................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.1 Original Listing Criteria ............................................................................................................... 28 2.2.2 Assessment of remaining criteria ........................................................................................... 32 2.3 LAND USE AND TENURE ........................................................................................................................ 33 3. ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF THE FLOOD PLAIN LOWER RINGAROOMA RIVER RAMSAR SITE ..................................................................................................... 38 3.1 ECOLOGICAL ZONES OF THE SITE ........................................................................................................ 38 3.1.1 The Coastal Zone ..................................................................................................................... 40 3.1.2 The Estuary Zone .................................................................................................................... 43 3.1.3 The Freshwater Zone ............................................................................................................. 45 3.2 COMPONENTS AND PROCESSES OF THE SITE ...................................................................................... 49 3.2.1 Climate ........................................................................................................................................ 49 3.2.2 Geomorphology ........................................................................................................................ 52 3.2.3 Substrate .................................................................................................................................... 54 3.2.4 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................... 54 3.2.5 Water Quality ............................................................................................................................ 57 3.2.6 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. 58 3.2.7 Fauna ........................................................................................................................................... 62 3.3 BENEFITS AND SERVICES OF THE SITE ................................................................................................ 68 3.4 CRITICAL COMPONENTS AND PROCESSES AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS ............................................. 72 3.4.1 Critical components and processes .................................................................................. 72 3.4.2 Essential elements .................................................................................................................. 75 3.5 CRITICAL BENEFITS AND SERVICES .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 250 State Secretary: [email protected] Journal Editors: [email protected] Home Page
    Tasmanian Family History Society Inc. PO Box 191 Launceston Tasmania 7250 State Secretary: [email protected] Journal Editors: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.tasfhs.org Patron: Dr Alison Alexander Fellows: Dr Neil Chick, David Harris and Denise McNeice Executive: President Anita Swan (03) 6326 5778 Vice President Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Vice President Peter Cocker (03) 6435 4103 State Secretary Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 State Treasurer Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Committee: Judy Cocker Margaret Strempel Jim Rouse Kerrie Blyth Robert Tanner Leo Prior John Gillham Libby Gillham Sandra Duck By-laws Officer Denise McNeice (03) 6228 3564 Assistant By-laws Officer Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Webmaster Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Journal Editors Anita Swan (03) 6326 5778 Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 LWFHA Coordinator Anita Swan (03) 6394 8456 Members’ Interests Compiler Jim Rouse (03) 6239 6529 Membership Registrar Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Publications Coordinator Denise McNeice (03) 6228 3564 Public Officer Denise McNeice (03) 6228 3564 State Sales Officer Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Branches of the Society Burnie: PO Box 748 Burnie Tasmania 7320 [email protected] Devonport: PO Box 587 Devonport Tasmania 7310 [email protected] Hobart: PO Box 326 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 [email protected] Huon: PO Box 117 Huonville Tasmania 7109 [email protected] Launceston: PO Box 1290 Launceston Tasmania 7250 [email protected] Volume 29 Number 2 September 2008 ISSN 0159 0677 Contents Editorial ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 1.0MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57( I): 143-165 ( 1998) 1 May 1998 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1998.57.08 FISHES OF WILSONS PROMONTORY AND CORNER INLET, VICTORIA: COMPOSITION AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC AFFINITIES M. L. TURNER' AND M. D. NORMAN2 'Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, PO Box 1379,Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia ([email protected]) 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia (corresponding author: [email protected]) Abstract Turner, M.L. and Norman, M.D., 1998. Fishes of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. Victoria: composition and biogeographic affinities. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57: 143-165. A diving survey of shallow-water marine fishes, primarily benthic reef fishes, was under­ taken around Wilsons Promontory and in Comer Inlet in 1987 and 1988. Shallow subtidal reefs in these regions are dominated by labrids, particularly Bluethroat Wrasse (Notolabrus tet­ ricus) and Saddled Wrasse (Notolabrus fucicola), the odacid Herring Cale (Odax cyanomelas), the serranid Barber Perch (Caesioperca rasor) and two scorpidid species, Sea Sweep (Scorpis aequipinnis) and Silver Sweep (Scorpis lineolata). Distributions and relative abundances (qualitative) are presented for 76 species at 26 sites in the region. The findings of this survey were supplemented with data from other surveys and sources to generate a checklist for fishes in the coastal waters of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. 23 I fishspecies of 92 families were identified to species level. An additional four species were only identified to higher taxonomic levels. These fishes were recorded from a range of habitat types, from freshwater streams to marine habitats (to 50 m deep).
    [Show full text]
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Phylogeny, Biogeography and Taxonomy of Galaxioid Fishes
    Aspects of the phylogeny, biogeography and taxonomy of galaxioid fishes Jonathan Michael Waters, BSc. (Hons.) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, / 2- Oo ( 01 f University of Tasmania (August, 1996) Paragalaxias dissim1/is (Regan); illustrated by David Crook Statements I declare that this thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published o:r written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text. This thesis is not to be made available for loan or copying for two years following the date this statement is signed. Following that time the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signed Summary This study used two distinct methods to infer phylogenetic relationships of members of the Galaxioidea. The first approach involved direct sequencing of mitochondrial DNA to produce a molecular phylogeny. Secondly, a thorough osteological study of the galaxiines was the basis of a cladistic analysis to produce a morphological phylogeny. Phylogenetic analysis of 303 base pairs of mitochondrial cytochrome b _supported the monophyly of Neochanna, Paragalaxias and Galaxiella. This gene also reinforced recognised groups such as Galaxias truttaceus-G. auratus and G. fasciatus-G. argenteus. In a previously unrecognised grouping, Galaxias olidus and G. parvus were united as a sister clade to Paragalaxias. In addition, Nesogalaxias neocaledonicus and G. paucispondylus were included in a clade containing G.
    [Show full text]
  • Aire River Estuary Management Plan
    SCOPING STUDY: Aire River estuary management plan August 2009 Document history Revision: Revision no. 02 Author/s M. Stacey R. Hardie S. Tilleard Checked R. Hardie Approved R. Hardie Distribution: Revision no. 01 Issue date 28 May 2009 Issued to Simone Wilkie (CCMA) Description: Draft for comment Revision no. 02 Issue date 26 August 2009 Issued to Simone Wilkie (CCMA) Description: Final Citation: Please cite this document as: Stacey, M, Hardie, R and Tilleard, S. (2009). Aire River estuary management plan: scoping study. Report P109021R01 by Alluvium for Corangamite CMA, Colac Ref: L:\Projects\2009\021_Aire_River_Mgt_Plan\1_Deliverables\P109021 _R01V02b.docx Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Approach 1 2.1 Site inspection and familiarisation 1 2.2 Literature and legislative review 1 Definition of a watercourse 8 2.3 Review and collation of additional background information 9 Historic ground photography 9 Development of a program logic 9 2.4 Development of a spatial activity plan 9 Public land boundaries 10 Attachment A Spatial activity plan and program logic Attachment B Historic ground photography Attachment C Historic aerial photography comparison Attachment D Tasmanian Mudfish ( Neochanna Cleaveri) information Tables Table 1. Planning and management literature reviewed for the project 2 Table 2. Key legislation reviewed for the project 3 Table 3. Relevant management recommendations identified in the literature reviewed for this project 4 Abbreviations Alluvium Alluvium Consulting Pty Ltd CCMA Corangamite Catchment Management Authority CRHS Corangamite river health strategy. DSE Department of Sustainability and Environment MERI Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting and Improvement Aire River estuary management plan: scoping study i 1 Introduction The Corangamite Catchment Management Authority (CCMA) commissioned Alluvium Consulting Pty Ltd (Alluvium) to undertake a scoping study for the Aire River Management Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Dredging Best Practice Environmental Management
    BEST PRACTICE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR DREDGING BEST PRACTICE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR DREDGING Environment Protection Authority 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA © Environment Protection Authority, October 2001 Publication 691 ISBN 0 7306 7578 5 Printed on recycled paper FOREWORD Dredging is necessary to create and maintain shipping and boating channels so that we can continue to engage in international trade and to enjoy safe fishing and recreational boating. However, dredging has the potential for significant environmental impact. These guidelines identify such impacts and suggest measures that may be taken to minimise them. They have been developed in consultation with organisations that undertake dredging, dredging contractors and conservation interests. In many cases impacts are minimal, but any impacts can cause considerable public concern. For example, discharge of black anaerobic sand onto sandy beaches looks and smells unpleasant, but the environmental impacts are minimal, and a typical sand colour returns after a few days exposure to air. Where the impacts of dredging are poorly known these are identified in the guidelines and addressed through monitoring or targeted research where this is considered more appropriate. A new mandatory process for consideration of dredging proposals is outlined. This represents a new step towards better control of the impacts of dredging that started when EPA developed the Trial Dredge Protocol in 1992. It involves a cooperative approach between Environment Protection Authority and the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, and the issuing of a Coastal Management Act 1995 consent for dredging works. Further advances in dredging technology and in our understanding of the major impacts will, in time, lead to further improvements to these guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Mudfish (Neochanna Galaxiidae) Literature Review
    1 0 . 2 C omp E tition and pr E dation Analysis of NZFFD records indicates that Neochanna species occurred in habitats without any other fish species on more than half of the occasions they were recorded (Table 10). Although a wide variety of other fish species may sometimes co-occur with Neochanna species, the incidence of co-occurrence is typically low except for one or two species. It is thought that Neochanna species are generally intolerant of competition because of their small size, general lack of aggression, small mouth and low metabolic rate, all of which may reduce their potential to be dominant competitors (Meredith 1985). While Neochanna are not inherently territorial or aggressive towards con-specifics, Barrier & Hicks (1994) reported that adult N. diversus were aggressive towards G. affinis, and Eldon (1969) found N. apoda were aggressive when outnumbered, or in the presence of a multitude of species in aquaria (Eldon 1969). It has also been suggested (Meredith 1985) that Neochanna species may lack predator-avoidance mechanisms. However, when disturbed suddenly, N. cleaveri can jump to a height of 50–60 mm above the water before immediately diving down to the pool bottom. Fish may repeat this manoeuvre two or three times in quick succession and it is likely used to facilitate their escape from aquatic predators (Andrews 1991). Juvenile N. burrowsius exhibit a similar behaviour when startled, although not jumping as high (L. O’Brien, pers. obs.). The following sections provide further information on commonly occurring inter-specific interactions. 10.2.1 Anguilla species Eels (Anguillidae; Anguilla) prey on Neochanna, including larger (120 mm) individuals (Mitchell 1995; Eldon 1978b, 1979a), and there is a surprisingly low level of co-occurrence between Neochanna species and eels, considering the ubiquitous distribution of Anguilla species (Table 10).
    [Show full text]
  • Neochanna Cleaveri, Australian Mudfish
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2019: T122904064A123382186 Scope: Global Language: English Neochanna cleaveri, Australian Mudfish Assessment by: Whiterod, N., Hammer, M., Freeman, R., Raadik, T. & Coleman, R. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Whiterod, N., Hammer, M., Freeman, R., Raadik, T. & Coleman, R. 2019. Neochanna cleaveri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T122904064A123382186. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T122904064A123382186.en Copyright: © 2019 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Actinopterygii Osmeriformes Galaxiidae Taxon Name: Neochanna cleaveri (Scott, 1934) Synonym(s): • Galaxias cleaveri Scott, 1934 • Galaxias upcheri Scott, 1942 • Saxilaga anguilliformis Scott, 1936 Common Name(s): • English: Australian Mudfish Taxonomic Source(s): Eschmeyer, W.N., Fricke, R., and Ven der Laan, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Irrigation Pty Ltd, Benbullen Quarry
    Tasmanian Irrigation Pty Ltd Benbullen Quarry Environmental Effects Report February 2017 Table of contents 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................................3 2. Proponent Information....................................................................................................................4 3. Project Description .........................................................................................................................4 3.1 Description of Project...........................................................................................................4 3.2 Project Area, Map and Site Plan..........................................................................................5 3.3 Rationale and Alternatives.................................................................................................10 4. Potential Environmental Effects ...................................................................................................10 4.1 Flora and Fauna.................................................................................................................10 4.2 Rivers, Creek, Wetlands and Estuaries .............................................................................15 4.3 Significant Areas ................................................................................................................17 4.4 Air Emissions .....................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Tasmanian Mudfish, Galax/As Cleaver/ (Pisces: Galaxiidae)
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Tasmania Open Access Repository Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 125, 1991 55 OBSERVATIONS ON THE TASMANIAN MUDFISH, GALAX/AS CLEAVER/ (PISCES: GALAXIIDAE) by A.P. Andrews (with two tables, one text-figure and two plates) ANDREWS, A.P., 1991 (20:xii): Observation on the Tasmanian mudfish, Galaxias cleaveri (Pisces: Galaxiidae). Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 125: 55-59. ISSN 0080-4703. Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, 40 Macquarie Street, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000. Meristic and morphometric comparisons are made of the three known populations of the Tasmanian mudfish; mainland Tasmania, Flinders Island and Victoria. The results of observations on the ecology and behaviour are reported. Key Words: Tasmanian mudfish, taxonomy, ecology, behaviour. INTRODUCTION a proprietary flake food. This diet was supplemented occasionally with small pieces of finely chopped worms and Most members of the genus Calaxias are small to medium­ crayfish. sized, fast-swimming, mid-water fishes that can be either lacustrine or diadromous (Whitley 1935). However, one species, Calaxias cleaveri Scott 1934, differs so markedly TAXONOMY from typical Tasmanian members of the genus that at one stage it was referred to tpe genus Saxilaga by Scott (1936). The taxonomy of C. cleaveri has been considered (Andrews Meristic and morphometric comparison of the mainland 1976) at both generic and specific levels, and subsequent Tasmanian, Flinders Island and Victorian populations authors, such as McDowall & Frankenberg (1981) and indicate that the three are conspecific. Jackson & Davies (1982), have neither made nor suggested The principal non-taxonomic differences between C.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogical Society of Tasmania Inc
    GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA INC. Volume 20 Number 1—June 1999 GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA INC. PO Box 60 Prospect Tasmania 7250 State Secretary: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.tased.edu.au/tasonline/geneal Patron: Emeritus Professor Michael Roe Executive: President Mrs Anne Bartlett (03) 6344 5258 Vice President Mr David Harris (03) 6424 5328 Vice President Vacant Executive Secretary Miss Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Executive Treasurer Miss Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Committee: Mrs Elaine Burton Mr Peter Cocker Mrs Judy Cocker Mr John Dare Mrs Isobel Harris Mrs Pat Harris Mrs Denise McNeice Mrs Colleen Read Mrs Rosalie Riley Mrs Dian Smith By-laws Officer Mrs Denise McNeice (03) 6228 3564 Exchange Journal Coordinator Mrs Thelma McKay (03) 6229 3149 Home Page Coordinator Mr Peter Cocker (03) 6435 4103 Journal Editor Mrs Rosemary Davidson (03) 6278 2464 Journal Coordinator Mr David Freestun (03) 6243 9384 Library Coordinator Mrs Rosalie Riley (03) 6264 1036 LWFHA Coordinator Mr Don Gregg (03) 6229 6519 Members’ Interests Mr Allen Wilson (03) 6244 1837 Membership Secretary Mr John Dare (03) 6424 7889 Publications Coordinator Mrs Anne Bartlett (03) 6344 5258 Public Officer Mrs Denise McNeice (03) 6228 3564 Research Coordinator Mrs Denise McNeice (03) 6228 3564 Sales Coordinator Mrs Pat Harris (03) 6344 3951 TAMIOT Coordinator Mrs Betty Calverley (03) 6344 5608 VDL Heritage Index Mr Neil Chick (03) 6266 4072 Branches of the Society Burnie: PO Box 748 Burnie Tasmania 7320 Devonport: PO Box 587 Devonport Tasmania 7310 Hobart: GPO Box 640 Hobart Tasmania 7001 Huon: PO Box 117 Huonville Tasmania 7109 Launceston: PO Box 1290 Launceston Tasmania 7250 Volume 20 Number 1 June 1999 ISSN 0159 0677 Contents Editorial .
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Freshwater Fish Fauna of the Tarkine Region, North-West Tasmania
    Bush Blitz – Tarkine Region North-West Tasmania, 27 January to 6 February 2015 A survey of the freshwater fish fauna of the Tarkine region, north-west Tasmania 27 January – 6 February 2015 Submitted: 26 March 2015 Scott Hardie Page 1 of 29 Bush Blitz – Tarkine Region North-West Tasmania, 27 January to 6 February 2015 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Collection methods .................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 General methods .................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 8 2.3 Identifying the collections .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]