DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond Close Air Support Forging a New Air-Ground Partnership

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beyond Close Air Support Forging a New Air-Ground Partnership CHILD POLICY This PDF document was made available CIVIL JUSTICE from www.rand.org as a public service of EDUCATION the RAND Corporation. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE Jump down to document6 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit POPULATION AND AGING research organization providing PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY objective analysis and effective SUBSTANCE ABUSE solutions that address the challenges TERRORISM AND facing the public and private sectors HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND around the world. INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Beyond Close Air Support Forging a New Air-Ground Partnership Bruce R. Pirnie, Alan Vick, Adam Grissom, Karl P. Mueller, David T. Orletsky Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Beyond close air support : forging a new air-ground partnership / Bruce R. Pirnie ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MG-301.” ISBN 0-8330-3741-2 (pbk.) 1. Close air support. 2. Military doctrine—United States. 3. United States. Air Force. I. Pirnie, Bruce, 1940– UG700.B48 2005 358.4'142—dc22 2004030608 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2005 RAND Corporation All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2005 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 202, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1516 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface Although airmen have been providing close air support (CAS) to friendly ground forces since World War I, recent operations in Af- ghanistan and Iraq have brought renewed attention to the unique demands of this mission. The Army increasingly views air power as indispensable to its future warfighting concepts and seeks mecha- nisms to ensure that it is available and responsive to the needs of the land forces. For the Air Force, counterland operations are becoming more important, but airmen remain concerned with ensuring that air power’s unique ability to mass rapidly is not lost in efforts to provide on-call fires to small ground elements spread across a large battle space. To address these and related policy challenges, Project AIR FORCE conducted a study of close support on the future battlefield. The study addressed three major policy questions: (1) How should air attack and ground maneuver be integrated? (2) How should the CAS terminal attack control function be executed? (3) How should ground maneuver/fires and air attack be deconflicted? This research builds on work done in Project AIR FORCE over the past ten years to provide a better understanding of the air-ground partnership as well as to en- hance the Air Force contribution in operations against enemy land forces. Previous RAND reports in this area include: • The Stryker Brigade Combat Team: Rethinking Strategic Respon- siveness and Assessing Deployment Options, by Alan Vick, David T. Orletsky, Bruce Pirnie, and Seth G. Jones, MR-1606-AF, 2002. iii iv Beyond Close Air Support: Forging a New Air-Ground Partnership • Aerospace Operations Against Elusive Ground Targets, by Alan Vick, Richard M. Moore, Bruce Pirnie, and John Stillion, MR-1398-AF, 2001. • Aerospace Operations in Urban Environments: Exploring New Concepts, by Alan Vick, John Stillion, Dave Frelinger, Joel S. Kvitky, Benjamin S. Lambeth, Jefferson P. Marquis, and Matthew C. Waxman, MR-1187-AF, 2000. • Enhancing Airpower’s Contribution Against Light Infantry Targets, by Alan Vick, John Bordeaux, David T. Orletsky, and David A. Shlapak, MR-697-AF, 1996. The research reported here was sponsored by the Director of Operational Planning, Headquarters, U.S. Air Force, and was con- ducted within the Strategy and Doctrine Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE. RAND Project Air Force RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF), a division of the RAND Corpo- ration, is the U.S. Air Force’s federally funded research and develop- ment center for studies and analyses. PAF provides the Air Force with independent analyses of policy alternatives affecting the development, employment, combat readiness, and support of current and future aerospace forces. Research is conducted in four programs: Aerospace Force Development; Manpower, Personnel, and Training; Resource Management; and Strategy and Doctrine. The research reported here was prepared under contract F49642-01-C-0003. Additional information about PAF is available at http://www. rand.org/paf. Contents Preface ...................................................................... iii Figures ...................................................................... ix Tables....................................................................... xi Summary .................................................................. xiii Acknowledgments......................................................... xxi Abbreviations .............................................................xxv CHAPTER ONE Introduction.................................................................1 Background ..................................................................1 Purpose and Organization of This Report...................................4 CHAPTER TWO The Evolving Relationship Between Air Power and Land Power .......7 Air Power Against Armies: Counterland Operations ........................7 The Spectrum of Counterland Missions..................................8 Differences Among the Counterland Missions ......................... 10 Operational Conceptions of Air Power and Land Power.................. 13 Air Power Augments Land Power ...................................... 14 Air Power Complements Land Power .................................. 15 Air Power Partners with Land Power ................................... 16 Air Power Dominates Land Power ..................................... 18 Air Power Trumps Land Power......................................... 19 The Air-Land Partnership in Perspective ............................... 20 v vi Beyond Close Air Support: Forging a New Air-Ground Partnership Envisioning Air Power and Land Power on Future Battlefields ........... 21 Counterland Operations Are Critical to U.S. Strategy ................. 21 Air Power Is Increasingly Effective Against Land Forces ............... 22 Land Forces Provide Unique and Essential Capabilities................ 25 Land Forces Are Increasingly Reliant on Aerial Firepower ............. 26 Enemy Reactions Reinforce the Need for Air-Land Integration........ 27 Why Forge a New Air-Land Partnership? ................................ 28 CHAPTER THREE Trends in Counterland Operations...................................... 31 Introduction ............................................................... 31 Land Forces Are the Critical Target Set ................................... 32 Joint Action Is Improving Counterland ................................... 33 Jointness Is Descending to Lower Echelons ............................... 36 Kosovo (Operation Allied Force) ......................................... 38 Strategy.................................................................. 38 Operations .............................................................. 41 Insights.................................................................. 44 Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom) ............................. 46 Strategy.................................................................. 46 Operations .............................................................. 50 Insights.................................................................. 56 Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom) .......................................... 61 Strategy.................................................................. 61 Operations .............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The LLI Review: Fall 2011, Volume 6
    Volume 6 Fall 2011 The Annual Journal of the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Explorations by and about older learners In this issue: ■ Research and Theory ■ Life Stories ■ Best Practices ■ Poetry ■ Learning Resources The LLI Review Editor E. Michael Brady Professor of Adult Education and Senior Research Fellow Osher Lifelong Learning Institute University of Southern Maine Associate Editors Robert Atkinson Professor of Human Development and Senior Research Fellow Osher Lifelong Learning Institute University of Southern Maine Rick Lamb Osher Lifelong Learning Institute University of Southern Maine Betty Welt Coastal Senior College Thomaston, Maine Poetry Editor Pat Budd Osher Lifelong Learning Institute University of Southern Maine Editorial Board Pauline Abbott, OLLI at California State University at Fullerton Marilyn Blumsack, OLLI at Tufts University Anne Cardale, National Resource Center for the Osher Lifelong Learning Institutes Richard B. Chobot, Consultant Rebecca Goodman, OLLI at University of Hawaii Marvin Hunt, School of Professional and Graduate Programs, Baker University Nona Lyons, University College, Cork (Ireland) Barbara Peterson, OLLI at Northwestern University Ara Rogers, OLLI at the University of South Florida Lucille D. Salerno, OLLI at University of Missouri-Columbia, Michelle Sierpina, OLLI at University of Texas Medical Branch Vincent Waldron, OLLI at Arizona State University Print ISSN 1932–7625 Online ISSN 1932–7633 The LLI Review is indexed in EBSCOHOST including Academic Search Premier and Education Research Complete. For information about how to obtain additional print copies of The LLI Review, please go to www.osher.net Cover photographs by Michael Saukstelis, Promax Productions, Inc. Copy editor: Kyle Allen The LLI Review Fall 2011 Welcome elcome to Volume 6 of The LLI Review.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-09.3, Close Air Support, As a Basis for Conducting CAS
    Joint Publication 3-09.3 Close Air Support 08 July 2009 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for planning and executing close air support. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for interagency coordination and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, and subordinate components of these commands, and the Services. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Kulturelle Aneignung Des Spielraums. Vom Virtuosen Spielen
    Alexander Knorr Die kulturelle Aneignung des Spielraums Vom virtuosen Spielen zum Modifizieren und zurück Ausgangspunkt Obgleich der digital divide immer noch verhindert, dass Computerspiele zu ge- nuin globalen Gütern werden, wie es etwa der Verbrennungsmotor, die Ka- laschnikow, Hollywoodikonen, Aspirin und Coca Cola längst sind, sprengt ihre sich nach wie vor beschleunigende Verbreitung deutlich geografische, natio- nale, soziale und kulturelle Schranken. In den durch die Internetinfrastruktur ermöglichten konzeptuellen Kommunikations- und Interaktionsräumen sind Spieler- und Spielkulturen wesentlich verortet, welche weiten Teilen des öf- fentlichen Diskurses fremd und unverständlich erscheinen, insofern sie über- haupt bekannt sind. Durch eine von ethnologischen Methoden und Konzepten getragene, lang andauernde und nachhaltige Annäherung ¯1 an transnational zusammengesetzte Spielergemeinschaften werden die kulturell informierten Handlungen ihrer Mitglieder sichtbar und verstehbar. Es erschließen sich so- ziale Welten geteilter Werte, Normen, Vorstellungen, Ideen, Ästhetiken und Praktiken – Kulturen eben, die wesentlich komplexer, reichhaltiger und viel- schichtiger sind, als der oberflächliche Zaungast es sich vorzustellen vermag. Der vorliegende Artikel konzentriert sich auf ein, im Umfeld prototypischer First-Person-Shooter – genau dem Genre, das im öffentlichen Diskurs beson- ders unter Beschuss steht – entstandenes Phänomen: Die äußerst performativ orientierte Kultur des trickjumping. Nach einer Einführung in das ethnologische
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Sentry Is Pub- Lished by BHG, Inc., a Private fi Rm Operating Independently of the U.S
    NORTHERN SENTRY FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 1 FREE | VOL. 55 • ISSUE 36 | WWW.NORTHERNSENTRY.COM | MINOT AIR FORCE BASE | FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 U.S. AIR FORCE PHOTO | AIRMAN 1ST CLASS ALYSSA M. AKERS 2 FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 NORTHERN SENTRY AIRMAN 1ST CLASS ALYSSA M. AKERS | MINOT AIR FORCE BASE PUBLIC AFFAIRS MINOT AIR FORCE causing it to capsize. 429 Lawrence was one of laid to rest at Immanuel Airmen, families and BASE, N.D. -- sailors and marines were the missing who were Lutheran Church in Willow military veterans. More “Yesterday, December trapped, giving the ultimate identifi ed. Creek. than 200 people lined the 7th, 1941, a date which will sacrifi ce, their life. He was fi nally returned Lawrence was welcomed live in infamy, the United “I thought it was home to North Dakota, on by Willow City natives, States of America was impossible he was dead,” Aug. 13, 2017. He was Minot Air Force Base Continued on page 3 suddenly and deliberately said Anderson. “We all attacked by naval and air thought maybe he went to forces of the Empire of town and stayed overnight. Japan.” We just received Christmas With those words, cards from him. [But] a few President Franklin days after, we were told he Roosevelt ensured America was killed.” would never forget Pearl In 1943, the Oklahoma Harbor. was removed from the Betty Anderson was only ocean and the bodies were 15 years old, but this would recovered. Due to the lack be a day she and her family of technology at the time, would never forget.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoughts About My Tour in Vietnam
    CW2 Martin Beckman in the Operations area Delta Company, 227th 1st Cavalry Division, Lai Khe, Republic of Vietnam May, 1970. Thoughts on My Tour of Duty in the Republic of Vietnam By Martin P Beckman Jr. Friday, 07 July, 2006 1 I was born in Anderson, South Carolina and finished High School there. I attended The Citadel and graduated in 1968. I was then drafted and tested to go to flight school with the U.S. Army. For primary helicopter training I was in WOC class 69-19 at Fort Walter’s Texas and afterwards assigned to Fort Rucker, Alabama. There I was promoted to Warrant Officer One and received my Army Aviator “Silver Wings”. I was selected for a Cobra transition at Fort Stewart, Georgia in route to Vietnam. In my th first tour I flew Cobra’s with the Delta Company, 227 Group, 1st Air Calvary Division from August 1969 until August 1970. I later extended my time in Vietnam to fly the UH1 with the 2nd Signal Group. When I arrived in the Republic of Vietnam, we first went to the assignment station where you waited to receive orders to your Unit. I remember all the second tour soldiers and aviators looking very anxiously at the list on the wall next to the orderly room that was posted several times a day. After a few days of waiting my name was on the list for the 1st Calvary st st Division. From there the 1 “Cav” soldiers were bused to the 1 Team Academy at Bien Hoa.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Air Force Presentation to the Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel United States
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY PERSONNEL UNITED STATES SENATE SUBJECT: AIR FORCE RESERVE PROGRAMS STATEMENT OF: Lieutenant General James E. Sherrard III Chief of Air Force Reserve MARCH 31, 2004 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE 1 Air Force Reserve 2004 Posture Statement Mr Chairman, and distinguished members of the Committee, I would like to offer my sincere thanks for this opportunity, my last, to testify before you. As of 30 Sep 03, United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR) has a total of 8,135 people mobilized under Partial Mobilization Authority. These individuals are continuing to perform missions involving; Security, Intelligence, Flight Operations for Combat Air Patrols (CAPs), Communications, Air Refueling Operations, Strategic and Tactical Airlift Operations, Aero Medical, Maintenance, Civil Engineering and Logistics. The Partial Mobilization for the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) is the longest sustained, large-scale mobilization in the history of the Air Force. AFR mobilizations peaked at 15,332 on April 16, 2003 during OIF with a cumulative 28,239 mobilizations sourced in every contingency supporting GWOT since September 11, 2001. Early GWOT operations driven by rapid onset events and continued duration posed new mobilization and re- mobilization challenges, which impacted OIF even though only a portion of the Reserve capability was tapped. In direct support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF), Operation IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF), and the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), Air Force Reservists have flown a multitude of combat missions into Afghanistan and Iraq. The 93rd Bomb Squadron is an example of one of the many units to successfully integrate with active duty forces during combat missions in OEF and OIF.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Minutes – 2016 Archive
    Final Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Florida Defense Support Task Force Minutes for the Florida Defense Support Task Force Meeting #41 on Thursday, January 21, 2016 The Florida Defense Support Task Force held a publicly noticed meeting at DoubleTree by Hilton,Tallahassee, Florida 09:00 AM EST – 11:20 AM EST. For Agenda: See Page 2 Task Force Members Present: Tom Neubauer, Bay Defense Alliance, Vice Chairman Senator Mike Bennett, Manatee County Supervisor of Elections BrigGen Chip Diehl, USAF, Ret. ADM Mark Fitzgerald, USN, Ret. Commissioner Barbara Stewart, Highlands County Representative Ritch Workman Representative Dana Young Task Force Members on the Phone: None Task Force Members Absent: Senator Garrett Richter, Chairman MG Mike Calhoun, USA, The Adjutant General of Florida CW5 Derrick Fritts, USA Representative Clay Ingram J.R. McDonald, Lockheed Martin MG Joseph Taluto, USA, Ret. Speakers Present: Secretary Tony Principi, The Principi Group (TPG) MG Mike Jones, USA, Ret., TPG Gary Clark, Deputy Secretary, Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) Deb Keller, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) LtCol Kevin Beeker, USAF, 598th Range Squadron Commander (RANS) Others Present: Ana Richmond, Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) Bob Black, US Congressman Jeff Miller’s Office Brian Mimbs, US Senator Marco Rubio’s Office Kent Watson, US Congresswoman Gwen Graham’s Office Lindsey Smith, Senator Thad Altman’s Office Beth Walker, DEO Barbara Foster, DEO Rod Lewis, CareerSource Florida MAJ Adam Bailey, USA, Department of Military Affairs/Florida
    [Show full text]
  • User Instructions
    HOW TO PLAY WALKTHROUGH REFERENCE & ANALYSIS A EXTRAS USER INSTRUCTIONS MAP: FLORENCE PRESENT 01 SEQUENCE 01 SEQUENCE 02 MAP: TUSCANY SEQUENCE 03 SEQUENCE 04 WALKTHROUGH MAPS: LEGEND SEQUENCE 05 The two main icons used on our maps are the same as those used in the game, ensuring instant MAP: ROMAGNA identification. SEQUENCE 06 ICON REPRESENTS PRESENT 02 Viewpoint USER INSTRUCTIONS MAP: VENICE Codex Pages SEQUENCE 07 Before you go any further, take a few seconds to familiarize yourself with the structure and SEQUENCE 08 systems used in the Walkthrough chapter with this simple illustrated guide. SEQUENCE 09 Overview maps – Whenever you have access to a new region in the game, you will find A a corresponding overview map in the guide. Each of these provides a top-down view of the SEQUENCE 10 entire location, with lines marking the borders of individual districts within larger cities. To avoid potential spoilers, and because practically all collectibles and points of interest already SEQUENCE 11 appear on the in-game maps, our maps are designed purely as an aid to easy navigation, with annotations used only to document notable landmarks, viewpoints and Codex Pages (see SEQUENCE 14 “Walkthrough Maps: Legend” text box) – the latter being a special collectible required to complete the game. We cover other items of note in the Extras chapter. PRESENT 03 Left-hand pages: main walkthrough – The main walkthrough guides you through every B main Memory (for which, read: mission) in the story. It has been written to offer just the right amount of knowledge required to successfully complete all missions, but without giving too much away.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Strafing
    The Art of Strafing By Richard B.H. Lewis ODERN fighter pilots risk their lives Mevery day performing the act of strafing, which to some may seem like a tactic from a bygone era. Last Novem- ber, an F-16 pilot, Maj. Troy L. Gilbert, died strafing the enemy in Iraq, trying Painting by Robert Bailey to protect coalition forces taking fire on the ground. My first thought was, “Why was an F-16 doing that mission?” But I already knew the answer. In the 1980s, at the height of the Cold War, I was combat-ready in the 512th Fighter Squadron, an F-16 unit at Ramstein AB, Germany. We had to maintain combat status in air-to- air, air-to-ground, and nuclear strike operations. We practiced strafing oc- casionally. We were not very good at it, but it was extremely challenging. There is a big difference between was “Gott strafe England” (“God punish flight controls and a 30 mm Gatling flying at 25,000 feet where you have England”). The term caught on. gun. I have seen the aircraft return from plenty of room to maneuver and you In the World War I Battle of St. Mihiel, combat with one engine and major parts can barely see a target, and at 200 feet, Capt. Eddie Rickenbacker once strafed of a wing and flight controls blown off. where the ground is rushing right below eight German artillery pieces, each Unquestionably, the A-10 is the ultimate you and you can read the billboards drawn by a team of six horses.
    [Show full text]
  • Air-To-Ground Battle for Italy
    Air-to-Ground Battle for Italy MICHAEL C. MCCARTHY Brigadier General, USAF, Retired Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 2004 Air University Library Cataloging Data McCarthy, Michael C. Air-to-ground battle for Italy / Michael C. McCarthy. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-128-7 1. World War, 1939–1945 — Aerial operations, American. 2. World War, 1939– 1945 — Campaigns — Italy. 3. United States — Army Air Forces — Fighter Group, 57th. I. Title. 940.544973—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112–6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . v ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii PREFACE . ix INTRODUCTION . xi Notes . xiv 1 GREAT ADVENTURE BEGINS . 1 2 THREE MUSKETEERS TIMES TWO . 11 3 AIR-TO-GROUND BATTLE FOR ITALY . 45 4 OPERATION STRANGLE . 65 INDEX . 97 Photographs follow page 28 iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Foreword The events in this story are based on the memory of the author, backed up by official personnel records. All survivors are now well into their eighties. Those involved in reconstructing the period, the emotional rollercoaster that was part of every day and each combat mission, ask for understanding and tolerance for fallible memories. Bruce Abercrombie, our dedicated photo guy, took most of the pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • Repüléstudományi Közlemények (ISSN: 1417-0604) 2002., Pp
    Varga Mihály mk. alezredes ZMNE KLHTK Dékáni Titkárság [email protected] Doctrine, organization and weapon systems of close air support of the Luftwaffe in World War II A Lufwaffe közvetlen légi támogatási doktrínája, szervezete és fegyver-rendszerei a második világháborúban Resume The author presents the essence of doctrine, organization, command and control and weapon systems of close air support of Luftwaffe in World War II. He gives an overview about most frequently used aircraft and their tactical-technical features. The article demonstrates that the close air support is one of the most important components of the tactics success and it was since the appearance of the aerial warfare. Rezümé A szerző ismerteti a lényegét a második világháborús Luftwaffe közvetlen légi támogatási doktrínájának, a végrehajtásért felelős szervezetnek és a légi vezetési és irányítási rendszernek. A szerző áttekinti a leggyakrabban alkalmazott fegyver- rendszereket, csata és bombázó repülőgépeket, valamint azok jellemzőit. A cikk demonstrálja, hogy a harcászati siker egyik legfontosabb összetevőjének tekinthetjük a csapatok közvetlen légi támogatását a légi hadviselés kezdetei óta. Introduction The close air support (generally supporting the land forces from air with fire) one of the most important components of the tactics success and it was since the appearance of the aerial warfare. According to the definition of close air support (CAS): „air action against hostile targets which are in close proximity to friendly forces and which require detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of those forces” 1 At the beginning of the world war II, only the Luftwaffe had made a theory of deployment and a tactical-technical procedures for direct fire support for ground forces.
    [Show full text]