DOCSLIB.ORG

History of U.S. Child Sex Abuse Statutes of Limitation Reform: 2002 to 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History of U.S. Child Sex Abuse Statutes of Limitation Reform: 2002 to 2020 History of U.S. Child Sex Abuse Statutes of Limitation Reform: 2002 to 2020 2020 Annual Report: A National Overview of the Movement to Prevent Child Sex Abuse and Empower Victims through Statutes of Limitation Reform Since 2002 February 26, 2021 Lead Author: Prof. Marci A. Hamilton, Esq. Founder, CEO, and Legal Director, CHILD USA Fels Institute of Government Professor University of Pennsylvania [email protected] (215) 539-1906 Contributing Authors: Alice Bohn, Esq., Staff Attorney Alice Nasar Hanan, Esq., Staff Attorney Lauren Majewski, Esq., Staff Attorney Jessica Schidlow, Esq. Staff Attorney CHILD USA is the leading nonprofit think tank working to end child abuse and neglect in the United States. CHILD USA engages in high-level legal, social science, and medical research and analysis to derive the best public policies to end child abuse and neglect. CHILD USA produces evidence-based solutions and information needed by policymakers, organizations, lawyers, media, and society to increase child protection and the common good. Our goal is to help millions of children at a time. For more information about CHILD USA, please visit our website at https://www.childusa.org/. © 2021 CHILD USA www.childusa.org |3508 Market St., Suite 202 | Philadelphia, PA 19104 | 215.539.1906 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 4 II. The State-by-State Developments in Child Sex Abuse Statutes of Limitations After January 2002........................................................................................................................................................... 13 A. The States ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Alabama ............................................................................................................................................ 13 Alaska ............................................................................................................................................... 14 Arizona .............................................................................................................................................. 15 Arkansas ............................................................................................................................................ 16 California ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Colorado ........................................................................................................................................... 17 Connecticut ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Delaware ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Florida ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Georgia .............................................................................................................................................. 20 Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................... 21 Idaho ................................................................................................................................................. 22 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Indiana............................................................................................................................................... 23 Iowa................................................................................................................................................... 24 Kansas ............................................................................................................................................... 25 Kentucky ........................................................................................................................................... 26 Louisiana .......................................................................................................................................... 26 Maine ................................................................................................................................................ 27 Maryland ........................................................................................................................................... 27 Massachusetts ................................................................................................................................... 28 Michigan ........................................................................................................................................... 29 Minnesota .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Mississippi ........................................................................................................................................ 30 Missouri ............................................................................................................................................ 30 Montana ............................................................................................................................................ 31 Nebraska ........................................................................................................................................... 32 Nevada .............................................................................................................................................. 33 New Hampshire ................................................................................................................................ 34 New Jersey ........................................................................................................................................ 34 New Mexico ...................................................................................................................................... 35 New York .......................................................................................................................................... 36 North Carolina .................................................................................................................................. 37 North Dakota ..................................................................................................................................... 37 Ohio................................................................................................................................................... 39 Oklahoma .......................................................................................................................................... 39 Oregon............................................................................................................................................... 40 Pennsylvania ..................................................................................................................................... 41 Rhode Island ..................................................................................................................................... 42 South Carolina .................................................................................................................................. 42 South Dakota ..................................................................................................................................... 43 www.childusa.org |3508 Market Street, Suite 202 | Philadelphia, PA 19104 | 215.539.1906 2 Tennessee .......................................................................................................................................... 43 Texas ................................................................................................................................................. 44 Utah ................................................................................................................................................... 45 Vermont ............................................................................................................................................ 46 Virginia ............................................................................................................................................. 46 Washington ....................................................................................................................................... 47 West Virginia .................................................................................................................................... 48 Wisconsin .......................................................................................................................................... 49 Wyoming........................................................................................................................................... 49 Washington D.C. ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The New Laws of the Indies for the Good Treatment and Preservation of the Indians(1542) King Charles V
    The New Laws of the Indies for the Good Treatment and Preservation of the Indians (1542) King Charles V King Charles V. 1971. The New Laws of the Indies for the Good Treatment and Preservation of the Indians. New York: AMS Press Inc. The Spanish arrival in the Americas arguably posed as many challenges for the Iberian monarchy and its peoples as it did for their New World counterparts. In a very short time span, Spain grew from a loose confederation of kingdoms into a global empire. Even as Christopher Columbus was embarking upon his epic voyage to the West, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella were struggling to consolidate their power over the Iberian peninsula. The more than 700-year effort to repel the Moorish invasion from North Africa had just ended in 1492, and the monarchs faced considerable obstacles. On the one hand, they had to contend with the question of how to assimilate peoples that geography, culture, and religion (the Moors, for instance, were Muslims) long had distanced from one another. On the other hand, and in the absence of a clearly defined common enemy, they had to find a means of maintaining and strengthening their hold over the sizeable population of nobles (hidalgos) who earlier had offered them their loyalty in exchange for the possibilities of material gain. With the fighting over, the monarchs could no longer offer the longstanding incentives of land, honor, and treasure as a means of reigning in the nobility. Ferdinand and Isabella sat atop a veritable powder keg. Columbus's arrival in the New World drew Spain's internal conflicts and challenges into the global arena where distance made them even more problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Legal Heritage
    California’s Legal Heritage n the eve of California’s statehood, numerous Spanish Civil Law Tradition Odebates raged among the drafters of its consti- tution. One argument centered upon the proposed o understand the historic roots of the legal tradi- retention of civil law principles inherited from Spain Ttion that California brought with it to statehood and Mexico, which offered community property rights in 1850, we must go back to Visigothic Spain. The not conferred by the common law. Delegates for and Visigoths famously sacked Rome in 410 CE after years against the incorporation of civil law elements into of war, but then became allies of the Romans against California’s common law future used dramatic, fiery the Vandal and Suevian tribes. They were rewarded language to make their cases, with parties on both with the right to establish their kingdom in Roman sides taking opportunities to deride the “barbarous territories of Southern France (Gallia) and Spain (His- principles of the early ages.” Though invoked for dra- pania). By the late fifth century, the Visigoths achieved ma, such statements were surprisingly accurate. The complete independence from Rome, and King Euric civil law tradition in question was one that in fact de- established a code of law for the Visigothic nation. rived from the time when the Visigoths, one of the This was the first codification of Germanic customary so-called “barbarian” tribes, invaded and won Spanish law, but it also incorporated principles of Roman law. territory from a waning Roman Empire. This feat set Euric’s son and successor, Alaric, ordered a separate in motion a trajectory that would take the Spanish law code of law known as the Lex Romana Visigothorum from Europe to all parts of Spanish America, eventu- for the Hispanic Romans living under Visigothic rule.
    [Show full text]
  • The Portuguese and Spanish in the Americas
    Name: ________________________________________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Class: _____ The Portuguese and Spanish in the Americas Multiple-Choice Quiz – ANSWER KEY Directions: Select the best answer from the given options. 1. Which of the following ships was not part of the 6. Native Americans were forced to work for the fleet of Christopher Columbus in 1492? Spanish under the _____ system. a. Ana Lucia a. encomienda b. Nina b. mercantilism c. Pinta c. patron d. Santa Maria d. socialist 2. What was the capital city of the Aztec? 7. A person of mixed Native American and Spanish a. Chichen Itza descent: b. Guadalajara a. Americano c. Los Angeles b. Indian d. Tenochtitlan c. mestizo d. mulatto 3. Modern Mexico, and a portion of modern Guatemala, were once known as _____. 8. El Camino Real: a. Columbia a. The Real Country b. Los Lobos b. The Real Deal c. New Spain c. The Royal Casino d. Nueva America d. The Royal Road 4. What modern American state, located in the 9. What Aztec ruler was killed in 1520? southeast, was settled by the Spanish in the 16th a. Montezuma century? b. Sitting Bull a. Alabama c. Tupac b. Florida d. Yo Pe c. Georgia d. South Carolina 10. What Spanish explorer traveled into what is now the southwestern United States between 1540 5. A person of mixed African and Spanish descent: and 1542? a. Americano a. Cabrillo b. Indian b. Coronado c. mestizo c. Ponce de Leon d. mulatto d. Verrazzano Visit www.studenthandouts.com for free interactive test-prep games…no log-in required! Name: ________________________________________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Class: _____ 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish Colonies
    EARLY ENCOUNTERS, 1492-1734 Spanish Colonies Content Warning: This resource addresses sexual assault and physical violence. Resource: Life in Encomienda Background The spread of Catholicism was the stated goal of the Spanish conquest of the New World, but the Spanish also wanted to profit from their new territories. Once the treasure of Native civilizations was looted, colonists turned to mining and plantation farming, and needed to find cheap labor to maximize their profits. In her early instructions for the governance of the colonies, Queen Isabella I of Spain required all Native people to pay tribute to the crown or its representatives. Out of this directive, the encomienda system was born. In this system, encomenderos were awarded the control of all of the Native people who lived in a defined territory, usually in recognition of special services to the crown. For example, conquistador Hernán Cortés was awarded an encomienda territory that included 115,000 Native inhabitants. Cortés’s power over his people was absolute. He could demand tribute in the form of crops or currency. He could force them to construct forts and towns, or work the mines or plantations. He could sexually exploit the women, and even sell the people who worked for him to other encomenderos. In time, the horrors of life on the encomiendas would spark outrage back in Spain. About the Image Bartholomé de las Casas arrived in the New World in 1502 as part of one of the first waves of the Spanish invasion of the Americas. He was rewarded with an encomienda for his services to the crown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Encomienda in Early Philippine Colonial History
    THE ENCOMIENDA IN EARLY PHILIPPINE COLONIAL HISTORY by Dr. Eric A. Anderson Immediately the conquest had ended there appeared in the oolon'izatbn (of conquered territories and peoples) the need to apportion lands and Indians, as a reward to the most vigorous oonquistadores. The Indian was the essential element in the work of the land and of the mines. From this subjection of the indigene to the Spaniard \1.\'lS born the institution we know by the name enoomienda.l Introduction One of the dilemmas, of early Spanish expansion into the Indies was that of securing Indian labour sufficient to support those colonies, while ensuring to the Indians basic human rights. No royal commission, empowered to investigate and advise on Spanish-Indian relationships, was ever fully convinced of the legality (much less the morality) of the encom/enda and repartimiento for ordering natjve labour. At the same time, these or similar commissions could never escape the fact that Spanish settlement in and exploitation of the Americas was untenable with­ out native labour. 25 26 ASIAN STUDIES The encom/enda system, which had its roots in Spain of the Reconquista, 2 as a policy of rewarding meritorious crown servants in the colonies, attempted to reconcile labour needs with Indian justice. It takes no special gifts of observation or argument to realise that where the need for native labour was acute, and instru­ ments for the protection of natives inefficient and unpopular, these various ends were in continual and fundamental conflict. Encomienda, which began in the American colonies soon after permanent Spanish settlement, was scarcely distinguishable at that time from repartimiento.
    [Show full text]
  • Uimersity Mcrofihns International
    Uimersity Mcrofihns International 1.0 |:B litt 131 2.2 l.l A 1.25 1.4 1.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL 1010a (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No. 2) University Microfilms Inc. 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction Is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages In any manuscript may have Indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques Is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When It Is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to Indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to Indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right In equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page Is also filmed as one exposure and Is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or In black and white paper format. * 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro­ fiche but lack clarify on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available In black and white standard 35mm slide format.* *For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Questions on Chapter 3 Section 2
    Notes and Questions on Chapter 3 Section 2 Early Explorations • Spanish conquistadors, or conquerors, came to the Americas in search of gold and glory helping make Spain one of the richest nations in Europe. • By 1511, Spain had conquered Puerto Rico, Jamaica, and Cuba. • They were exploring the eastern coast of North and South America as they were still looking for a western route to Asia. Spanish Conquistadors • In 1520 Spanish Conquistador Hernando Cortes conquered the Aztec. Aztec’s rules in what is now modern day Mexico • A few years later, Spanish Conquistador Francisco Pizzarro sails along the Pacific coast of present-day Chile and attacks the Incas. By 1535 Pizzarro controlled much of the Incan Empire. Reasons for Spanish Victories • How did the Spanish defeat such large and powerful Native American empires? • Technology -The Spanish soldiers wore armor and used iron swords, guns, and cannons. • Weak resistance- The Aztecs were slow to fight because they thought the Spanish might be gods. The Incas were weak from fighting with each other. • Disease -Indians had no resistance to Europeans diseases like chicken pox, measles, and influenza. Governing New Spain • Spanish King decided to set up a strong system of government to rule his growing empire in the Americas. • He divided the lands into New Spain and Peru with a viceroy, royal official, in charge of each. • The Laws of the Indies stated how the viceroys were to organize and rule. • The laws provided for three types of settlements could be made; Pueblos, Presidios, and Missions. • Pueblos -towns that were the centers of farming and trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Calls for Justice in the New World: the Prophetic Life of Bartolomé De Las Casas in the Spanish Colonization of the Americas
    Whitworth Digital Commons Whitworth University History of Christianity II: TH 314 Honors Program Spring 2018 Calls for Justice in the New World: The rP ophetic Life of Bartolomé de Las Casas in the Spanish Colonization of the Americas Daniel Roberts Whitworth University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.whitworth.edu/th314h Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the History of Religions of Western Origin Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, Daniel , "Calls for Justice in the New World: The rP ophetic Life of Bartolomé de Las Casas in the Spanish Colonization of the Americas" Whitworth University (2018). History of Christianity II: TH 314. Paper 18. https://digitalcommons.whitworth.edu/th314h/18 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at Whitworth University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History of Christianity II: TH 314 by an authorized administrator of Whitworth University. Daniel Roberts TH-314 History of Christianity II Dr. Keith Beebe 26 April, 2018 Calls for Justice in the New World: The Prophetic Life of Bartolomé de Las Casas in the Spanish Colonization of the Americas For Christians of European and American descent, the history of the conquest of the Americas and further enslavement of Africans is a harsh reminder that Christians can be just as violent and destructive as any tyrant who has ever lived. Much like Shakespeare’s Lady Macbeth, Westerners have the memory of millions of dead and enslaved on their hands, a memory which cannot easily be washed away, plaguing the conscience.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.SLAVERY and CHILD TRAFFICKING in PUERTO RICO
    Revista Brasileira do Caribe ISSN: 1518-6784 [email protected] Universidade Federal do Maranhão Brasil Chinea, Jorge SLAVERY AND CHILD TRAFFICKING IN PUERTO RICO AT THE CLOSING OF THE AFRICAN SLAVE TRADE: The Young Captives of the Slaver Majesty, 1859-18651 Revista Brasileira do Caribe, vol. 17, núm. 32, enero-junio, 2016, pp. 59-98 Universidade Federal do Maranhão Sao Luís, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=159148014004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SLAVERY AND CHILD TRAFFICKING IN PUERTO RICO AT THE CLOSING OF THE AFRICAN SLAVE TRADE: The Young Captives of the Slaver Majesty, 1859-18651 Jorge Chinea History Department Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan RESUMO Quando quantifi cadas, as publicações sobre a escravidão africana nas ilhas “açucareiras” do Caribe dedicadas a Porto Rico são minoritárias A escasa cobertura da colonia espanhola pode se explicar, en parte, pela sua tardía participação nas “revoluções do açúcar» fato que conduziu à consolidação do sistema de plantações organizado en base ao trabalho servil que foi implantado no Atlántico Sul. Porto Rico participou no comercio de escravos durante un período muito breve, aproximadamente entre 1765 e 1850, num clima interno caracterizado por una escasez crónica de capital e por mudanças revolucionarias externas que, fi nalmente, levaram à probição da trata de escravos por Inglaterra a partir de 1807. Como resultado da campanha inglesa a favor da abolição internacional do comercio de escravos, Espanha viu- se obrigada assinar tratados com ela para terminar com a importação de cativos africanos nas suas colonias.
    [Show full text]
  • Tordesillas, Slavery and the Origins of Brazilian Inequality∗
    Tordesillas, Slavery and the Origins of Brazilian Inequality∗ Thomas Fujiwaray Humberto Laudaresz and Felipe Valencia Caicedox June 4, 2021 Abstract This article documents the long-term effect of slavery on inequality at the receiving end of the spectrum. We focus on Brazil, the largest im- porter of African slaves and the last country to abolish this institution in the Western Hemisphere, in 1888. To deal with the endogeneity of slav- ery placement, we use a spatial Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), exploiting the colonial boundaries between the Portuguese and Spanish empires within Brazil. We find that the number of slaves in 1872 is dis- continuously higher on the Portuguese side of the border, consistent with this power's comparative advantage in transatlantic slavery. We then show how this differential slave rate led to higher modern income inequality of 0.103 points (of the Gini coefficient), approximately 20% of average income inequality in the country. To further investigate the mechanisms at play, we use the division of the former Portuguese colony into Donatary Cap- taincies as well as the Dutch colonization experience. Aside from the effect on income inequality, we find that more slave intensive areas have higher income and educational racial imbalances, and lower state capacity today. JEL codes: O10, N36, O54, O43, I24 Keywords: Slavery, Inequality, Brazil, Regression Discontinuity Design, Colo- nization, Institutions, Racial Income Gap, Education ∗We would like to thank Gani Aldashev, Jean-Louis Arcand, Matias Cattaneo, Matteo
    [Show full text]
  • Las Casas, Destruction of the Indies, 1542
    J. Carter Brown Library, Brown University Bartolomé de las Casas A SHORT ACCOUNT OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE INDIES written 1542, published 1552* [EXCERPTS] _________________________________________ PRESENTATION by Bishop don Fray Bartolomé de las Casas or Casaus, to the most high and potent lord Prince of all the Spains don Felipe, our lord_________ Most high and potent lord: Title page, 1598 edition [Frankfurt] published by Because divine providence has ordered in this world Theodore de Bry with his engravings that for the direction and common utility of the human lineage the world be constituted by Kingdoms and peoples, with their kings like fathers and shepherds (as Homer has called them) and therefore the most noble and generous members of the republics, for that reason no doubt of the rectitude of the royal spirits of those kings may be held, or with right reason might be held. And if any wrongs, failings, defects, or evils should be suffered in those kingdoms, the only reason for that is that the kings have no notice of them. For these wrongs &c, if they be present and reported, it is the duty of the king, with greatest study and vigilant industry, to root them out. Considering, then, most potent lord, the evils and harm, the perditions and ruin the equals or likes And thus pregnant and nursing women and children and old persons and any others they might take, they of which, never were men imagined capable of doing would throw them into the holes until the pits were considering, as I say, those evils which as a man of filled, the Indians being pierced through by the stakes, fifty years’ and more experience, being in those lands which was a sore thing to see, especially the women with their children.
    [Show full text]
  • Pegasus July 2020
    July 2020 VOLUME XI, ISSUE VII PEGASUS A NEWSLETTER FOR THE CAUX ROUND TABLE FOR MORAL CAPITALISM NETWORK LOOKING AT BUSINESS ABOVE THE CLUTTER AND CONFETTI Pegasus Introduction by Richard Broderick Page 2 Slavery: A Widespread Affliction from the Middle Page 3 Ages to 19th Century Abolition by Stephen B. Young Introduction To paraphrase the old Chinese double-edged proverb, “May you live in interesting times.” We are indeed. The novel coronavirus pandemic has brought sickness and death to almost every corner in the world, with millions infected by this highly contagious zoonotic virus and rising rates of both death and suffering and the traumatic disruption of economic activity in many nations. In the U.S., unemployment rates have soared to heights not seen since the Great Depression. Meanwhile, thousands of retail businesses have been forced into bankruptcy because of the quarantine imposed in most states and countless other enterprises, both large small, struggle to survive. Most troubling of all, there is no definitive end in sight for this catastrophe, with labs around the world scrambling to create an effective vaccine. While this effort is sure to escalate, there is also no clear idea of when this pandemic will subside. It could surge again in the fall, perhaps winter or next spring. The sad fact is nobody knows for certain. As if this disruption of day-to-day life were not sufficient, there was the killing, caught in all its horror on video, of a black individual, George Floyd. His life was literally snuffed out by a Minneapolis police officer, as onlookers vocally warned the cops that Floyd was dying, which he did after one officer kneeled on Floyd’s neck for almost nine minutes, ignoring the crowd, as Floyd gasped that he could not breathe, moaned and called out to his late mother until he passed out and ultimately suffered cardiac arrest and died.
    [Show full text]