Oddities of the Insect World
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’ -
Report-VIC-Croajingolong National Park-Appendix A
Croajingolong National Park, Victoria, 2016 Appendix A: Fauna species lists Family Species Common name Mammals Acrobatidae Acrobates pygmaeus Feathertail Glider Balaenopteriae Megaptera novaeangliae # ~ Humpback Whale Burramyidae Cercartetus nanus ~ Eastern Pygmy Possum Canidae Vulpes vulpes ^ Fox Cervidae Cervus unicolor ^ Sambar Deer Dasyuridae Antechinus agilis Agile Antechinus Dasyuridae Antechinus mimetes Dusky Antechinus Dasyuridae Sminthopsis leucopus White-footed Dunnart Felidae Felis catus ^ Cat Leporidae Oryctolagus cuniculus ^ Rabbit Macropodidae Macropus giganteus Eastern Grey Kangaroo Macropodidae Macropus rufogriseus Red Necked Wallaby Macropodidae Wallabia bicolor Swamp Wallaby Miniopteridae Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis ~ Eastern Bent-wing Bat Muridae Hydromys chrysogaster Water Rat Muridae Mus musculus ^ House Mouse Muridae Rattus fuscipes Bush Rat Muridae Rattus lutreolus Swamp Rat Otariidae Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus ~ Australian Fur-seal Otariidae Arctocephalus forsteri ~ New Zealand Fur Seal Peramelidae Isoodon obesulus Southern Brown Bandicoot Peramelidae Perameles nasuta Long-nosed Bandicoot Petauridae Petaurus australis Yellow Bellied Glider Petauridae Petaurus breviceps Sugar Glider Phalangeridae Trichosurus cunninghami Mountain Brushtail Possum Phalangeridae Trichosurus vulpecula Common Brushtail Possum Phascolarctidae Phascolarctos cinereus Koala Potoroidae Potorous sp. # ~ Long-nosed or Long-footed Potoroo Pseudocheiridae Petauroides volans Greater Glider Pseudocheiridae Pseudocheirus peregrinus -
The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation
M DC, — _ CO ^. E CO iliSNrNVINOSHilWS' S3ldVyan~LIBRARlES*"SMITHS0N!AN~lNSTITUTl0N N' oCO z to Z (/>*Z COZ ^RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniIiSNI_NVINOSHllWS S3ldVaan_L: iiiSNi'^NviNOSHiiNS S3iavyan libraries Smithsonian institution N( — > Z r- 2 r" Z 2to LI ^R I ES^'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTlON'"NOIini!iSNI~NVINOSHilVMS' S3 I b VM 8 11 w </» z z z n g ^^ liiiSNi NviNOSHims S3iyvyan libraries Smithsonian institution N' 2><^ =: to =: t/J t/i </> Z _J Z -I ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS SSIdVyan L — — </> — to >'. ± CO uiiSNi NViNosHiiws S3iyvaan libraries Smithsonian institution n CO <fi Z "ZL ~,f. 2 .V ^ oCO 0r Vo^^c>/ - -^^r- - 2 ^ > ^^^^— i ^ > CO z to * z to * z ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNl NVINOSHllWS S3iaVdan L to 2 ^ '^ ^ z "^ O v.- - NiOmst^liS^> Q Z * -J Z I ID DAD I re CH^ITUCnMIAM IMOTtTIITinM / c. — t" — (/) \ Z fj. Nl NVINOSHIIINS S3 I M Vd I 8 H L B R AR I ES, SMITHSONlAN~INSTITUTION NOIlfl :S^SMITHS0NIAN_ INSTITUTION N0liniliSNI__NIVIN0SHillMs'^S3 I 8 VM 8 nf LI B R, ^Jl"!NVINOSHimS^S3iavyan"'LIBRARIES^SMITHS0NIAN~'lNSTITUTI0N^NOIin L '~^' ^ [I ^ d 2 OJ .^ . ° /<SS^ CD /<dSi^ 2 .^^^. ro /l^2l^!^ 2 /<^ > ^'^^ ^ ..... ^ - m x^^osvAVix ^' m S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — NOIlfliliSNrNVINOSHimS^SS iyvyan~LIBR/ S "^ ^ ^ c/> z 2 O _ Xto Iz JI_NVIN0SH1I1/MS^S3 I a Vd a n^LI B RAR I ES'^SMITHSONIAN JNSTITUTION "^NOlin Z -I 2 _j 2 _j S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVaan LI BR/ 2: r- — 2 r- z NVINOSHiltNS ^1 S3 I MVy I 8 n~L B R AR I Es'^SMITHSONIAN'iNSTITUTIOn'^ NOlin ^^^>^ CO z w • z i ^^ > ^ s smithsonian_institution NoiiniiiSNi to NviNosHiiws'^ss I dVH a n^Li br; <n / .* -5^ \^A DO « ^\t PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A. -
Ecological Consequences Artificial Night Lighting
Rich Longcore ECOLOGY Advance praise for Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting E c Ecological Consequences “As a kid, I spent many a night under streetlamps looking for toads and bugs, or o l simply watching the bats. The two dozen experts who wrote this text still do. This o of isis aa definitive,definitive, readable,readable, comprehensivecomprehensive reviewreview ofof howhow artificialartificial nightnight lightinglighting affectsaffects g animals and plants. The reader learns about possible and definite effects of i animals and plants. The reader learns about possible and definite effects of c Artificial Night Lighting photopollution, illustrated with important examples of how to mitigate these effects a on species ranging from sea turtles to moths. Each section is introduced by a l delightful vignette that sends you rushing back to your own nighttime adventures, C be they chasing fireflies or grabbing frogs.” o n —JOHN M. MARZLUFF,, DenmanDenman ProfessorProfessor ofof SustainableSustainable ResourceResource Sciences,Sciences, s College of Forest Resources, University of Washington e q “This book is that rare phenomenon, one that provides us with a unique, relevant, and u seminal contribution to our knowledge, examining the physiological, behavioral, e n reproductive, community,community, and other ecological effectseffects of light pollution. It will c enhance our ability to mitigate this ominous envirenvironmentalonmental alteration thrthroughough mormoree e conscious and effective design of the built environment.” -
Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, Microsites and Traits of Noctuidae and Butterflies
Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 35 Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Ken G.M. Bond and Tom Gittings Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science University College Cork Citation: Bond, K.G.M. and Gittings, T. (2008) Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies. Irish Wildlife Manual s, No. 35. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photo: Merveille du Jour ( Dichonia aprilina ) © Veronica French Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2008 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Database of Irish Lepidoptera ____________________________ CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................2 The concept of the database.....................................................................................................................2 The structure of the database...................................................................................................................2 -
Scottish Macro-Moth List, 2015
Notes on the Scottish Macro-moth List, 2015 This list aims to include every species of macro-moth reliably recorded in Scotland, with an assessment of its Scottish status, as guidance for observers contributing to the National Moth Recording Scheme (NMRS). It updates and amends the previous lists of 2009, 2011, 2012 & 2014. The requirement for inclusion on this checklist is a minimum of one record that is beyond reasonable doubt. Plausible but unproven species are relegated to an appendix, awaiting confirmation or further records. Unlikely species and known errors are omitted altogether, even if published records exist. Note that inclusion in the Scottish Invertebrate Records Index (SIRI) does not imply credibility. At one time or another, virtually every macro-moth on the British list has been reported from Scotland. Many of these claims are almost certainly misidentifications or other errors, including name confusion. However, because the County Moth Recorder (CMR) has the final say, dubious Scottish records for some unlikely species appear in the NMRS dataset. A modern complication involves the unwitting transportation of moths inside the traps of visiting lepidopterists. Then on the first night of their stay they record a species never seen before or afterwards by the local observers. Various such instances are known or suspected, including three for my own vice-county of Banffshire. Surprising species found in visitors’ traps the first time they are used here should always be regarded with caution. Clerical slips – the wrong scientific name scribbled in a notebook – have long caused confusion. An even greater modern problem involves errors when computerising the data. -
First Photographic Inland Records of Bull Shark Carcharhinus Leucas (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae) in Sumatran Waters, Indonesia
Ecologica Montenegrina 22: 171-176 (2019) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em First photographic inland records of bull shark Carcharhinus leucas (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae) in Sumatran waters, Indonesia MUHAMMAD IQBAL1, ELISA NURNAWATI2, ARUM SETIAWAN2, ZULKIFLI DAHLAN2 & INDRA YUSTIAN2* 1Conservation Biology Program, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Padang Selasa 524, Palembang, Sumatera Selatan 30129, Indonesia. 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Raya Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, Sumatera Selatan 30662, Indonesia. * Corresponding author [[email protected]] Received 13 January 2019 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 18 September 2019 │ Published online 29 September 2019. Abstract Two specimens (c.700 mm) of bull sharks Carcharhinus leucas (Müller & Henle, 1839) were caught and photographed by fishermen using trammel net on 29 September and 1 October 2017 in Musi River, South Sumatra province, Indonesia. These photos are considered as second record after 20 years (1997-2017), and first confirm inland record for Sumatra. Photographic records indicate specimens of C. leucas found in Musi River basin recorded about 75 km inland, and apparently very young juveniles. Further study and monitoring is needed to asses the possibility of the importance of Musi River basin as nursery area of C. leucas. Key words: Present, Carcharhinidae, Carcharhinus leucas, Indonesia, Musi River, freshwater. Introduction The requiem sharkfamily (Carcharhinidae) is one of the largest, most important shark families, with many common and wide-ranging species in tropical and warm temperates waters (Campagno & Niem, 1998; Ebert et al., 2013). Although most species inhabitat continental coastal and offshore marine waters, but the family includes the only freshwater shark species (Compagno et al., 2005; Ebert et al., 2013). -
Recording Days 2019 Review
Recording Days 2019 Review by Stuart Colgate What are they? • A day during which we record as many species as possible within a specific site. • All recorders welcome, from beginners to experts. Purpose of Recording Days… • Improve data coverage or refresh data in under-recorded areas • Allow Recorders access to new sites • Bring Recorders together from around the county and share skills and enthusiasm • Have fun Although not a training event… Those new to recording get the opportunity to spend time with more experienced recorders and perhaps pick up identification tips, etc. Assist by spotting species that might have otherwise been missed! Where we went in 2019… • Lowther Estate, Lowther, near Penrith • Harrington N.R., Salterbeck, Workington • Willowford Farm, Gilsland • Gowbarrow Hall, Watermillock, near Ullswater No. records collected No. species recorded 1064 1030 583 579 348 553 512 367 Lowther Harrington Lowther Harrington Willowford Gowbarrow Willowford Gowbarrow Lowther Estate, Lowther, near Penrith Saturday, 22nd June 2019 15 recorders attended A species Recording Day was held in the grounds of Lowther Park and farms. The main habitats comprise limestone exposures, limestone grassland, mesotrophic grassland, waterbodies and woodlands. Decoy Pond, Lowther Estate Copyright: Stuart Colgate Decoy Pond, Lowther Estate Copyright: David Benham Parkland, Lowther Estate Copyright: Stuart Colgate Melanohalea exasperata on tree cage rail Copyright: Chris Cant Lichen survey, Lowther Estate Copyright: Chris Cant Common cudweed Filago vulgaris Lowther Estate. Copyright: Jeremy Roberts Black Snipe Fly Chrysopillus cristatus Lowther Estate. Copyright: David Benham Common green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea, Lowther Estate. Copyright: Guy Broome Harrington Nature Reserve, Salterbeck, Workington Saturday, 6th July 2019 16 recorders attended This recording day was set on land that had been recently transformed from a silted reservoir to a more habitat diverse area. -
Arthropod Faunal Diversity and Relevant Interrelationships of Critical Resources in Mt
Arthropod Faunal Diversity and Relevant Interrelationships of Critical Resources in Mt. Malindang, Misamis Occidental Myrna G. Ballentes :: Alma B. Mohagan :: Victor P. Gapud Maria Catherine P. Espallardo :: Myrna O. Zarcilla Arthropod Faunal Diversity and Relevant Interrelationships of Critical Resources in Mt. Malindang, Misamis Occidental Myrna G. Ballentes, Alma B. Mohagan, Victor P. Gapud Maria Catherine P. Espallardo, Myrna O. Zarcilla Biodiversity Research Programme (BRP) for Development in Mindanao: Focus on Mt. Malindang and Environs The Biodiversity Research Programme (BRP) for Development in Mindanao is a collaborative research programme on biodiversity management and conservation jointly undertaken by Filipino and Dutch researchers in Mt. Malindang and its environs, Misamis Occidental, Philippines. It is committed to undertake and promote participatory and interdisciplinary research that will promote sustainable use of biological resources, and effective decision-making on biodiversity conservation to improve livelihood and cultural opportunities. BRP aims to make biodiversity research more responsive to real-life problems and development needs of the local communities, by introducing a new mode of knowledge generation for biodiversity management and conservation, and to strengthen capacity for biodiversity research and decision-making by empowering the local research partners and other local stakeholders. Philippine Copyright 2006 by Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA) Biodiversity Research Programme for Development in Mindanao: Focus on Mt. Malindang and Environs ISBN 971-560-125-1 Wildlife Gratuitous Permit No. 2005-01 for the collection of wild faunal specimens for taxonomic purposes, issued by DENR-Region X, Cagayan de Oro City on 4 January 2005. Any views presented in this publication are solely of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of SEARCA, SEAMEO, or any of the member governments of SEAMEO. -
Xiaoming CHEN
EdibleEdible InsectsInsects inin ChinaChina Xiaoming CHEN Professor and PhD Research Institute of Resource Insects ( RIRI ) Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAF) . History . Common species . Nutrition analysis . Cooking ways . Utilization 1.History1.History ofof edibleedible insectsinsects inin ChinaChina . MoreMore thanthan 3000yrs3000yrs historyhistory ofof edibleedible insectsinsects inin ChinaChina ((Y.Zhou,1981,S.W.Zhou.1982,History of entomology of China )) . In China ancient, edible insect as cate to respect gust. Some edible insects are both food and medicine . Even today, edible insect is popular in restaurant. By historian By entomologist 2.2. CommonCommon speciesspecies ofof edibleedible insectsinsects inin ChinaChina therethere areare 177species177species thatthat areare fromfrom 9696 genera,54genera,54 families,families, 1111 ordersorders recordedrecorded inin TheThe EdibleEdible InsectsInsects ofof ChinaChina (( ChenChen && Feng,1999Feng,1999)) .. (1)(1) EphemeridaEphemerida . ThereThere areare 3-43-4 speciesspecies asas food.food. CommonCommon speciesspecies isis EphemerellaEphemerella jianghongensisjianghongensis.. TheThe nutritiousnutritious elementselements ofof EE..jianghongensisjianghongensis havehave beenbeen analyzed.analyzed. Adult nymph nymph (2)(2) OdonataOdonata . 66 toto 77 speciesspecies dragonflydragonfly larvaelarvae areare recordedrecorded asas food.food. TheThe nutritiousnutritious elementselements ofof 33 speciesspecies havehave beenbeen analyzed.analyzed. Dragonfly (3)(3) IsopteraIsoptera . 1616 speciesspecies -
Featured Butterflies
Featured Butterflies African Moon Moth (Argema mimosae) Family: Saturniidae Region: Sub-Saharan Africa Wingspan: 100-120 cm (3.9-4.7 in) Larval host plants: Corkwoord (Commiphora), Marula (Sclerocarya birrea), and Tamboti (Spirostachys Africana) Habitats: Sub-tropical woodlands Atlas Moth (Attacus atlas) Family: Saturniidae Region: Indomalaya Wingspan: 159–300 mm (6.25-12 in) Larval host plants: Willow (Salix), popular (Populus) and privet (Ligustrum) Habitats: Tropical forests and lowlands Banded Peacock (Papilio palinurus) Family: Papilionidae Region: Indomalaya Wingspan: 85 mm (3.38 in) Larval host plants: Rutaceae (Zanthoxylum rhetsa) Habitats: Rain Forests Chocolate Pansy (Junonia iphita) Family: Nymphalidae Region: Indomalaya Wingspan: 50.8-60.96 mm (2-2.4 in) Larval host plants: Acanthaceae (Hygrophila costata) Habitats: Tropical rainforest Common Morpho (Morsho peleides) Family: Nymphalidae Region: Neotropical Wingspan: 95-120 mm (3.75-4.75 in) Larval host plants: Fabaceae Habitats: Forests Giant Charaxes (Charaxes castor) Family: Nymphalidae Region: Sub-Saharan Africa Wingspan: 110 mm (4.38 in) Larval host plants: Phyllanthaceae (Bridelia micrantha), Fabaceae (Afzelia quanzensis) Habitats: Woodlands and associated brush Great Mormon (Papilio memnon) Family: Papilionidae Region: Indomalaya, Paleartic Wingspan: 120-150 mm (4.7-5.9 in) Larval host plants: Rutaceae (citrus) Habitats: Rainforest Leopard Lacewing (Cethosia cyane) Family: Nymphalidae Region: Indomalaya Wingspan: 100 mm (4 in) Larval host plants: Passifloraceae (Passiflora) -
An Invertebrate Perspective to Hutchinson's Ratio Using
MAJOR ARTICLE TAPROBANICA, ISSN 1800–427X. August, 2015. Vol. 07, No. 04: pp. 224–234. © Research Center for Climate Change, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia www.taprobanica.org AN INVERTEBRATE PERSPECTIVE TO HUTCHINSON’S RATIO USING CO-OCCURRING TIGER BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CICINDELIDAE) ASSEMBLAGES Section Editor: Jörg Gebert Submitted: 31 December 2014, Accepted: 27 July 2015 Chandima Deepani Dangalle1, 2 and Nirmalie Pallewatta1 1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Colombo, Cumaratunga Munidasa Mawatha, Colombo 03, P.O. Box 00300, Sri Lanka; 2 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Tiger beetles co-occur for cryptic advantage, interspecific hybridization, reproductive synchrony and thermoregulation. Successful co-occurrence relies on the absence of competition and Hutchinson (1959) has proposed body size ratios for co-occurrence of bird and mammal taxa. The present study calculates body size ratios for co-occurring tiger beetle assemblages and investigates similarities with ratios for co-occurring birds and mammals. Ratios obtained using measurements of different morphological characters are considered and compared. Association of body size ratios of co- occurring tiger beetles with habitat type and number of species in co-occurring tiger beetle assemblage are determined. The study revealed a body weight ratio and body length ratio for co- occurring tiger beetles that was similar to Hutchinson’s ratios for birds and mammals. Different ratios were obtained when using different morphological parameters. Body size ratios inferred using mandible lengths differed significantly according to habitat type. Further, relatively higher values were observed for assemblages occupying terrestrial habitats while lower values were found for assemblages of aquatic habitats. Keywords: body size, competition, morphology, habitat type, Sri Lanka Introduction Many animals “co-occur” in multispecies in communities invaded by other species assemblages in various ecosystems.