GEMPACK USER DOCUMENTATION Release 7.0

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GEMPACK USER DOCUMENTATION Release 7.0 GEMPACK USER DOCUMENTATION Release 7.0 GPD-2 TABLO Reference TABLO Reference GEMPACK Document No. GPD-2 W. J. Harrison K. R. Pearson Centre of Policy Studies and Impact Project Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Third edition October 2000 Copyright 1985-2000. The Impact Project and KPSOFT. Third edition October 2000 ISSN 1030-2514 ISBN 0 7326 1521 6 This is part of the documentation of the GEMPACK Software System for solving large economic models, developed by the IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton Vic 3800, Australia. Abstract GEMPACK is a suite of general-purpose economic modelling software especially suitable for general and partial equilibrium models. It can handle a wide range of economic behaviour and also contains powerful capabilities for solving intertemporal models. GEMPACK provides software for calculating accurate solutions of an economic model, starting from an algebraic representation of the equations of the model. These equations can be written as levels equations, linearized equations or a mixture of these two. TABLO is the GEMPACK program which translates the algebraic specification of an economic model into a form which is suitable for carrying out simulations with the model. The output from TABLO can be either computer files used to run the GEMPACK program GEMSIM or alternatively, a Fortran program, referred to as a TABLO-generated program. Either GEMSIM or the TABLO- generated program can be run to carry out simulations. This document is a complete reference to the TABLO Input language and a User’s Guide to the program TABLO. It complements GEMPACK document GPD-3 Simulation Reference: GEMSIM, TABLO-generated Programs and SAGEM which is a guide to carrying out simulations on a model using GEMSIM, TABLO-generated programs or SAGEM. We assume that readers are familiar with the first GEMPACK document GPD-1 An Introduction to GEMPACK. This document GPD-2 contains • fine print about running TABLO and its Condensation stage, • a detailed description of the syntax and semantics of the TABLO language (as used in TABLO Input files specifying models), • advice about verifying that your model is actually carrying out the calculations that you intend, and • information about implementing and solving intertemporal (that is, dynamic) models using GEMPACK. Document Attributes Name : TABLO Reference Audience : CGE Modellers Identifier : GPD-2 History : Date Author(s) Comment April 1993 Jill Harrison and Ken Pearson First Edition (Release 5.0) [Title of first edition was “User’s Guide to TABLO and TABLO-generated Programs”] April 1994 Jill Harrison and Ken Pearson Second Edition (Release 5.1) [Title of second edition was “User’s Guide to TABLO, GEMSIM and TABLO-generated Programs”] October 2000 Jill Harrison and Ken Pearson Third Edition (Release 7.0) [Title of third edition is “TABLO Reference”] Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Running TABLO on an Existing Model 1-2 1.2 Adding Equations to a Model 1-2 1.3 Writing a TABLO Input File for a New Model 1-3 1.4 Modern Ways of Writing TABLO Input Files (on a PC) 1-3 1.4.1 Using TABmate 1-3 1.4.2 Using ViewHAR to Write TABLO Code for Data Manipulation 1-3 1.5 Condensing a Large Model 1-4 2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT RUNNING TABLO 2-5 2.1 TABLO Options 2-5 2.1.1 TABLO Input File Written on the Auxiliary Files 2-6 2.1.2 TABLO File and TABLO STI File Stored on Solution File 2-7 2.1.3 Specialised Check Options 2-7 2.1.4 Doing Condensation or Going to Code Generation 2-8 2.1.5 TABLO Code Options 2-8 2.1.6 Identifying and Correcting Syntax and Semantic Errors 2-8 2.2 TABLO Linearizes Levels Equations Automatically 2-9 2.2.1 Change or Percentage-change Associated Linear Variables 2-10 2.2.2 How Levels Statements are Converted 2-10 2.2.3 Linearizing Levels Equations 2-11 2.2.4 Linearizing a Sum 2-13 2.2.5 Algorithm Used by TABLO 2-13 2.3 More Details About Condensation and Substituting Variables 2-15 2.3.1 Looking Ahead to Substitution when Creating TABLO Input Files 2-17 2.3.2 System-initiated Formulas and Backsolves 2-18 2.3.3 Absorption 2-19 2.4 Memory Management for Fortran 77 TABLO 2-20 3. BASIC SYNTAX DESCRIPTION 3-21 3.1 SET 3-23 3.1.1 Set Unions, Intersections and Complements 3-25 3.1.2 Data-dependent Sets 3-25 3.2 SUBSET 3-26 3.3 COEFFICIENT 3-27 3.4 VARIABLE 3-28 3.5 FILE 3-30 3.6 READ 3-31 i 3.7 WRITE 3-32 3.8 FORMULA 3-34 3.9 EQUATION 3-35 3.9.1 "EQUATION(NONE);" Statement 3-35 3.9.2 FORMULA & EQUATION 3-36 3.10 UPDATE 3-37 3.11 ZERODIVIDE 3-38 3.12 DISPLAY 3-39 3.13 MAPPING 3-40 3.13.1 Formulas for Mappings, and Reading and Writing Mappings 3-40 3.14 ASSERTION 3-41 3.15 TRANSFER 3-42 3.16 Setting Default Values of Qualifiers 3-43 3.17 TABLO Statement Qualifiers - A Summary 3-44 3.17.1 Spaces and Qualifier Syntax 3-45 4. SYNTAX AND SEMANTIC DETAILS 4-47 4.1 General Notes on the TABLO Syntax and Semantics 4-47 4.1.1 TABLO Statements 4-47 4.1.2 Lines of the TABLO Input file 4-48 4.1.3 Upper and Lower Case 4-48 4.1.4 Comments 4-48 4.1.5 Strong Comment Markers 4-48 4.1.6 Reserved (special) Characters 4-48 4.2 User Defined Input 4-49 4.2.1 Names 4-49 4.2.2 Labelling Information (Text between hashes #) 4-50 4.2.3 Arguments – Indices, Set Elements, Index Offsets and Index Expressions 4-51 4.3 Quantifier lists 4-53 4.4 Expressions Used in Equations, Formulas and Updates 4-53 4.4.1 Operations Used in Expressions 4-53 4.4.2 Sums over Sets in Expressions 4-54 4.4.3 Brackets in Expressions 4-54 4.4.4 Functions 4-55 4.4.5 Conditional Quantifiers and SUMs 4-57 4.4.6 Conditional Expressions 4-58 4.4.7 Linear Variables in Expressions 4-59 4.4.8 Constants in Expressions 4-60 4.4.9 Indices in Expressions 4-60 4.4.10 Index-Expression Conditions 4-61 4.5 Coefficients and Levels Variables 4-63 4.5.1 Coefficents – What are they ? 4-63 ii 4.5.2 Model Parameters 4-63 4.5.3 Integer Coefficients in Expressions and Elsewhere 4-64 4.5.4 Where Coefficients and Levels Variables Can Occur 4-65 4.5.5 Reporting Levels Values when Carrying Out Simulations 4-68 4.5.6 How Do You See the Pre-simulation and Post-simulation Levels Values? 4-69 4.5.7 Specifying Acceptable Range of Coefficients Read or Updated 4-70 4.6 Sets 4-71 4.6.1 Set Size and Set Elements 4-71 4.6.2 Not Specifying Maximum Size of SETs 4-72 4.6.3 Set Unions and Intersections 4-72 4.6.4 Set Complements 4-73 4.6.5 Sets Whose Elements Depend on Data 4-74 4.6.6 Writing the Elements of One Set 4-74 4.6.7 Writing the Elements of All (or Many) Sets 4-75 4.6.8 Empty Sets 4-75 4.6.9 Reading Set Elements from a File 4-76 4.7 Subsets 4-78 4.8 Mappings Between Sets 4-79 4.8.1 Defining Set Mapping Values 4-80 4.8.2 Checking Values of a Mapping 4-82 4.8.3 Insisting That a Set Mapping be Onto 4-82 4.8.4 Using Set Mappings 4-83 4.8.5 Set Mappings Can Only Be Used in Index Expressions 4-83 4.8.6 Two or More Set Mappings in an Index Expression 4-83 4.8.7 Set Mappings in Arguments 4-84 4.8.8 Other Semantics for Mappings 4-84 4.8.9 Writing the Values of Set Mappings 4-85 4.8.10 Reading Part of a Set Mapping BY_ELEMENTS 4-85 4.8.11 Mapping Values Can be Given by Values of Other Mapping or Index 4-85 4.8.12 Writing a Set Mapping to a Text File 4-86 4.8.13 Writing a Set Mapping as Character Data 4-87 4.8.14 Long Name when a Set Mapping is Written to a Header Array File 4-87 4.8.15 ViewHAR and Set Mappings 4-87 4.9 Files 4-88 4.9.1 Text Files 4-88 4.10 Reads, Writes and Displays 4-90 4.10.1 How Data is Associated With Coefficients 4-90 4.10.2 Partial Reads, Writes and Displays 4-90 4.10.3 FORMULA(INITIAL)s 4-91 4.10.4 Coefficient Initialisation 4-92 4.10.5 Display Files 4-93 4.10.6 Transferring Long Names when Executing Write Statements 4-93 4.11 Updates 4-95 4.11.1 Purpose of Updates 4-95 4.11.2 Which Type of Update? 4-95 4.11.3 What If An Initial Value Is Zero ? 4-96 4.11.4 UPDATE Semantics 4-96 4.11.5 Deriving Update Statements – Example 1 (Sum of Two Flows) 4-97 4.11.6 Deriving Update Statements – Example 2 (Powers of Taxes) 4-98 4.11.7 Writing Updated Values from FORMULA(INITIAL)s 4-98 4.12 Transfer Statements 4-100 iii 4.12.1 XTRANSFER Statements on Command Files 4-101 4.13 Zerodivides 4-102 4.14 Ordering 4-104 4.14.1 Ordering of the Input Statements 4-104 4.14.2 Ordering of Variables 4-104 4.14.3 Ordering of Components of Variables 4-105 4.14.4 Ordering of the Equation Blocks 4-105 4.14.5 Ordering of the Equations Within One Equation Block 4-105 4.14.6 Ordering of Reads, Formulas, Equations and Updates 4-106 4.15 TABLO Input Files with No Equations 4-108 5.
Recommended publications
  • Solution Software for CGE Modeling
    Eleventh Floor, Menzies Building Monash University, Wellington Road CLAYTON Vic 3800 AUSTRALIA Telephone: from overseas: (03) 9905 2398, (03) 9905 5112 61 3 9905 2398 or 61 3 9905 5112 Fax: (03) 9905 2426 61 3 9905 2426 e-mail: [email protected] Internet home page: http//www.monash.edu.au/policy/ Solution Software for CGE Modeling by Mark HORRIDGE and Ken PEARSON Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University General Paper No. G-214 March 2011 ISSN 1 031 9034 ISBN 978 1 921654 21 3 The Centre of Policy Studies (COPS) is a research centre at Monash University devoted to economy-wide modelling of economic policy issues. Solution Software for CGE Modeling by Mark Horridge and Ken Pearson March 2011 Abstract We describe the progress of computable general equilibrium (CGE) modeling software since the 1980s and contrast the main systems used today: GAMS, MPSGE, and GEMPACK. The development of these general-purpose modeling systems has underpinned rapid growth in the use of CGE models and allowed models to be shared and their results replicated. We show how a very simple model may be implemented and solved in all 3 systems. We note that they produce the same numerical results but have different strengths. We conclude by considering some challenges for the future. JEL classification: C63, C68, D58. Keywords: CGE, software, GAMS, GEMPACK, MPSGE CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Early days 1 3. General-purpose software 3 3.1 Allow input intelligible to modelers 3 3.2 Handle a wide range of models 3 3.3 Insulate modelers from the solution method 4 3.4 Windows programs to control simulations and examine data and results 4 3.5 Run on different computers 5 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Sensitivity Analysis with Respect to Correlated Variations in Parameters and Shocks J
    Systematic Sensitivity Analysis with Respect to Correlated Variations in Parameters and Shocks J. Mark Horridge and Ken Pearson 27 January 2010, updated 20 December 2010 and 8 March 2011 Abstract We show how you can carry out systematic sensitivity analysis (SSA) with respect to parameters and/or shocks, which vary according to a specified covariance matrix. You can use the existing SSA tools in RunGTAP or RunGEM to do this if your model is implemented in GEMPACK. Those SSA tools assume that all parameters or shocks are varying independently (i.e., the distributions of all parameters or shocks are uncorrelated) or together (i.e., are completely correlated). The techniques in this paper remove those restrictions. However, users need to make small modifications to the TAB file for the model. Different modifications are needed for different SSA scenarios. Further, the standard SSA procedure built into RunGTAP and RunGEM allows you to compute the sensitivity of model results either with respect to variations in parameter values or with respect to variations in shock values, but you cannot vary both parameters and shocks at the same time. Our discussion concentrates on the parameter case. However, we later show how shock variation may be modelled as a type of parameter variation. This opens the door to simultaneous variation of shocks and parameters. We include worked examples of the techniques described, based on the standard GTAP model. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Global CGE Models with Sectoral Models to Generate Baseline Scenarios: Approaches, Challenges, and Opportunities
    Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Volume 5 (2020), No. 1, pp. 162-195. Linking Global CGE models with Sectoral Models to Generate Baseline Scenarios: Approaches, Challenges, and Opportunities BY RUTH DELZEITa, ROBERT BEACHb, RUBEN BIBASc, WOLFGANG BRITZd, JEAN CHATEAUe, FLORIAN FREUNDf, JULIEN LEFEVREg, FRANZISKA SCHUENEMANNh,TIMOTHY SULSERi, HUGO VALINj, BAS VAN RUIJVENk, MATTHIAS WEITZELl, DIRK WILLENBOCKELm, AND KRZYSZTOF WOJTOWICZn a Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiellinie 66, 24105 Kiel, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) b RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) c Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2 Rue André Pascal, 75016 Paris, France (e-mail: [email protected]) d Institute for Food and Resource Economics, University of Bonn, Nussallee 21, 53115 Bonn, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) e Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2 Rue André Pascal, 75016 Paris, France (e-mail: [email protected]) f Thünen Institut, Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) g Centre international de recherche sur l'environnement et le développement, 45bis Avenue de la Belle Gabrielle, 94130 Nogent-sur-Marne, France (e-mail: jlefevre@centre- cired.fr) h Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiellinie 66, 24105 Kiel, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) i International Food Policy Research Institute, Eye Street, 1201 I St NW, Washington, DC 20005, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) j International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schloßpl. 1, 2361 Laxenburg, Austria (e-mail: [email protected]) k International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schloßpl.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking CAPRI and GTAP
    System for Environmental and Agricultural Modelling; Linking European Science and Society Linking CAPRI and GTAP T. Jansson, M.H. Kuiper, M. Adenäuer Partners involved: LEI, UBONN Report no.: 39 September 2009 Ref: D3.8.3 ISBN no.: 978-90-8585-127-1 Logo’s main partners involved in this publication Sixth Framework Programme SEAMLESS No. 010036 Deliverable number: D3.8.3 18 March 2009 SEAMLESS integrated project aims at developing an integrated framework that allows ex- ante assessment of agricultural and environmental policies and technological innovations. The framework will have multi-scale capabilities ranging from field and farm to the EU25 and globe; it will be generic, modular and open and using state-of-the art software. The project is carried out by a consortium of 30 partners, led by Wageningen University (NL). Email: [email protected] Internet: www.seamless-ip.org Authors of this report and contact details Name: Torbjörn Jansson Partner acronym: LEI Address: PO Box 29703, 2502 LS, The Hague, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] Name: Marijke Kuiper Partner acronym: LEI Address: PO Box 29703, 2502 LS, The Hague, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] Name: Marcel Adenäuer Partner acronym: UBONN Address: Nussallee 21, 53115, Bonn, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Page 2 of 100 SEAMLESS No. 010036 Deliverable number: D3.8.3 18 March 2009 Disclaimer 1: “This publication has been funded under the SEAMLESS integrated project, EU 6th Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration, Priority 1.1.6.3. Global Change and Ecosystems (European Commission, DG Research, contract no.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight MFR By
    Manufacturers, Publishers and Suppliers by Product Category 11/6/2017 10/100 Hubs & Switches ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS CIS SECURE COMPUTING INC DIGIUM GEAR HEAD 1 TRIPPLITE ASUS Cisco Press D‐LINK SYSTEMS GEFEN 1VISION SOFTWARE ATEN TECHNOLOGY CISCO SYSTEMS DUALCOMM TECHNOLOGY, INC. GEIST 3COM ATLAS SOUND CLEAR CUBE DYCONN GEOVISION INC. 4XEM CORP. ATLONA CLEARSOUNDS DYNEX PRODUCTS GIGAFAST 8E6 TECHNOLOGIES ATTO TECHNOLOGY CNET TECHNOLOGY EATON GIGAMON SYSTEMS LLC AAXEON TECHNOLOGIES LLC. AUDIOCODES, INC. CODE GREEN NETWORKS E‐CORPORATEGIFTS.COM, INC. GLOBAL MARKETING ACCELL AUDIOVOX CODI INC EDGECORE GOLDENRAM ACCELLION AVAYA COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS EDITSHARE LLC GREAT BAY SOFTWARE INC. ACER AMERICA AVENVIEW CORP COMMUNICATION DEVICES INC. EMC GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY ACTI CORPORATION AVOCENT COMNET ENDACE USA H3C Technology ADAPTEC AVOCENT‐EMERSON COMPELLENT ENGENIUS HALL RESEARCH ADC KENTROX AVTECH CORPORATION COMPREHENSIVE CABLE ENTERASYS NETWORKS HAVIS SHIELD ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS AXIOM MEMORY COMPU‐CALL, INC EPIPHAN SYSTEMS HAWKING TECHNOLOGY ADDERTECHNOLOGY AXIS COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER LAB EQUINOX SYSTEMS HERITAGE TRAVELWARE ADD‐ON COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AZIO CORPORATION COMPUTERLINKS ETHERNET DIRECT HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE ADDON STORE B & B ELECTRONICS COMTROL ETHERWAN HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LT ADESSO BELDEN CONNECTGEAR EVANS CONSOLES HITACHI ADTRAN BELKIN COMPONENTS CONNECTPRO EVGA.COM HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS ADVANTECH AUTOMATION CORP. BIDUL & CO CONSTANT TECHNOLOGIES INC Exablaze HOO TOO INC AEROHIVE NETWORKS BLACK BOX COOL GEAR EXACQ TECHNOLOGIES INC HP AJA VIDEO SYSTEMS BLACKMAGIC DESIGN USA CP TECHNOLOGIES EXFO INC HP INC ALCATEL BLADE NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES CPS EXTREME NETWORKS HUAWEI ALCATEL LUCENT BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES CREATIVE LABS EXTRON HUAWEI SYMANTEC TECHNOLOGIES ALLIED TELESIS BLUE COAT SYSTEMS CRESTRON ELECTRONICS F5 NETWORKS IBM ALLOY COMPUTER PRODUCTS LLC BOSCH SECURITY CTC UNION TECHNOLOGIES CO FELLOWES ICOMTECH INC ALTINEX, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • GTAP Technical Paper No. 30
    Systematic Sensitivity Analysis with Respect to Correlated Variations in Parameters and Shocks J. Mark Horridge and Ken Pearson March 2011 GTAP Technical Paper No. 30 Systematic Sensitivity Analysis with Respect to Correlated Variations in Parameters and Shocks J. Mark Horridge and Ken Pearson GTAP Technical Paper No. 30 Abstract We show how you can carry out systematic sensitivity analysis (SSA) with respect to parameters and/or shocks, which vary according to a specified covariance matrix. You can use the existing SSA tools in RunGTAP or RunGEM to do this if your model is implemented in GEMPACK. Those SSA tools assume that all parameters or shocks are varying independently (i.e., the distributions of all parameters or shocks are uncorrelated) or together (i.e., are completely correlated). The techniques in this paper remove those restrictions. However, users need to make small modifications to the TAB file for the model. Different modifications are needed for different SSA scenarios. Further, the standard SSA procedure built into RunGTAP and RunGEM allows you to compute the sensitivity of model results either with respect to variations in parameter values or with respect to variations in shock values, but you cannot vary both parameters and shocks at the same time. Our discussion concentrates on the parameter case. However, we later show how shock variation may be modelled as a type of parameter variation. This opens the door to simultaneous variation of shocks and parameters. We include worked examples of the techniques described, based on the standard GTAP Model. 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Systematic Sensitivity Analysis (SSA) ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research Collection
    Research Collection Doctoral Thesis Transportation Networks and Economic Equilibrium Modeling Issues and Applications Author(s): van Nieuwkoop, Renger H. Publication Date: 2014 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010276775 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library DISS. ETH NO. 22241 Transportation Networks and Economic Equilibrium Modeling Issues and Applications A thesis submitted to ETH ZURICH for the degree of Doctor of Sciences presented by RENGER HERMAN VAN NIEUWKOOP lic. rer. pol. University of Berne born on April 2, 1959 Dutch Citizen of Lucerne (LU), Switzerland accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Sebastian Rausch Prof. Kay W. Axhausen Prof. Thomas F. Rutherford 2014 It is so easy to do something the hard way, and so hard to do it the easy way. Abstract This thesis is composed of three essays on integrated transport and economic equilibrium modeling. The models are used for the analysis of different parking policies and cordon tolls in Zurich. In the first essay we give a pedagogical introduction into the field of mixed complementarity (MC) format modeling for transport and computable equilibrium models. This format allows the re- searcher to use general-purpose modeling software and concentrate on the model structure without the need of formulating algorithms for solving the model. We show how to set up the Wardropian transportation equilibrium model as a link flow-based MC model, and use the Arrow-Debreu frame- work to implement a computable general equilibrium model in MC format.
    [Show full text]
  • The GTAP Model in R the Benefits of Involving the Community in the Development of General Equilibrium Tools for the Future
    The GTAP model in R The benefits of involving the community in the development of general equilibrium tools for the future Maros Ivanic1 1Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture June 1, 2020 The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the au- thor and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. Abstract Computable general equilibrium analysis has been greatly facili- tated by dedicated computing frameworks, such as GEMPACK, that allow the specification of models and scenarios in a largely human- readable format and are also able to solve them efficiently. While GEMPACK does its job well, it remains privately developed software that follows standards and conventions that have departed signifi- cantly from the mainstream which make it hard to integrate it with most commonly used analytical frameworks, such as R. In this paper we try to answer the question whether open-source, community-supported solutions may provide a viable substitute to GEMPACK's functionality. We perform a sample GTAP model simu- lation in R using several newly available R packages and compare the results and performance between the frameworks. We find that while the speed of the solvers currently available in R is lagging, especially for larger models, it is likely that the community of researchers would be able to eliminate this performance gap. We also expect that the benefits of being integrated in the R framework with its vast ecosystem of solutions more than compensates for the extra run time in R. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 The important role of GEMPACK in computable general equi- librium analysis .
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Regional Economic Impacts of the Present Drought on NSW
    1 Estimating the regional economic impacts of the present drought on NSW Report prepared by Glyn Wittwer, Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University 26 October 2018 Paper prepared for the 2019 AARES conference, Melbourne 2 Executive summary The economy of New South Wales has suffered from a drought which started in the northern part of the state in 2017 and has spread over much of the state in 2018. Prolonged droughts impose greater hardship on regional communities than a drought lasting one year. Given the prolonged nature of the present drought, this study uses a dynamic, multi-regional computable general equilibrium model of the Australian economy, VU-TERM, to estimate the impacts on regions within New South Wales. Modelling results indicate that state-wide real GDP falls relative to forecast by 0.4% or $2.2 billion in 2017-18 and prospectively by 0.9% or $5.3 billion in 2018-19. These impacts reflect a severe diminution of farm output, given that agriculture accounts for around 1.6% and downstream processing for around 3.5% of NSW’s income. State-wide modelled job arises due to drought are around 0.24% or 7,700 FTE jobs in 2017- 18 and 0.54% or 17,300 jobs in 2018-19. At the regional level, relatively farm-intensive parts of the state suffer proportionally greater drought-induced losses. The worst affected region is New England–North West, in which real GDP in 2018-19 falls more than 12% below forecast, with an accompanying drop in employment of 3.9%. Other hard-hit regions include Far West-Orana, in which 2018-19 real GDP falls 9.5% and employment falls 2.8% below forecast.
    [Show full text]
  • GEMPACK USER DOCUMENTATION Release 7.0
    GEMPACK USER DOCUMENTATION Release 7.0 GPD-3 Simulation Reference : GEMSIM, TABLO-generated Programs and SAGEM Simulation Reference : GEMSIM, TABLO-generated Programs and SAGEM GEMPACK Document No. GPD-3 W. J. Harrison K. R. Pearson Centre of Policy Studies and Impact Project Monash University, Melbourne, Australia First edition October 2000 Copyright 1985-2000. The Impact Project and KPSOFT. First edition October 2000 ISSN 1030-2514 ISBN 0-7326-1522-4 This is part of the documentation of the GEMPACK Software System for solving large economic models, developed by the IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton Vic 3800, Australia. Abstract GEMPACK is a suite of general-purpose economic modelling software especially suitable for applied general equilibrium models. GEMPACK provides software for calculating accurate solutions of an economic model, starting from an algebraic representation of the model. Simulations to solve for the endogenous variables given the exogenous variables and the shocks to these variables, are run in GEMPACK using one of the following programs: • the program GEMSIM, • the TABLO-generated program written by TABLO from the TABLO Input file for the model, or • the program SAGEM. This document is a complete reference for running simulations. Details are given of the syntax used in Command files and the methods used in solving the equations of the model. We assume that you are familiar with GEMPACK document GPD-1 An Introduction to GEMPACK. Document Attributes Name : Simulation Reference : GEMSIM, TABLO-generated Programs and SAGEM Audience : CGE Modellers Identifier : GPD-3 History : Date Author(s) Comment October 2000 Jill Harrison and Ken Pearson First Edition (Release 7.0) In the Release 6.0 documentation, GEMPACK document GPD-3 was “How to Create and Modify GEMPACK Header Array Files Using the Program MODHAR”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard GTAP Model in GAMS, Version 7
    Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Volume 3 (2018), No. 1, pp. 1-83. The Standard GTAP Model in GAMS, Version 7 BY DOMINIQUE VAN DER MENSBRUGGHEa The purpose of this paper is to describe a version of the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) computable general equilibrium (CGE) model implemented in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) that is a literal implementation of the standard General Economic Modeling Package (GEMPACK) version. There are a number of GAMS-based models that rely on the basic GTAP Data Base structure, but none is an exact replica of the GTAP model itself. This paper relies on version 7.0 of the GTAP model released in 2017 and that represents the latest version of the ’standard’ GTAP model, acknowledging that there are multiple variants. The code has been tested with release 9 of the GTAP Data Base that has 57 commodities and 140 countries/regions. JEL codes: C68, D58, D60, F1 Keywords: Applied general equilibrium analysis; international trade policy; global economic analysis 1. Introduction Tom Hertel and colleagues at the Center for Global Trade Analysis (GTAP) at Purdue University started development of the so-called Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model in the early 1990s in parallel with the development of the GTAP Data Base—the first widely available and public database of global economic activity designed for global computable general equilibrium (CGE) models.1 The model, database and applications were described in detail in Hertel (1997). The GTAP model has become a de facto standard for global computable general equi- librium (CGE) modeling, aided to some extent by the tools developed to ease the use of the model and interpretation of the results, and the extensive instructional support provided by the Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Ccsenet.Org/Ijef International Journal of Economics and Finance Vol
    International Journal of Economics and Finance; Vol. 7, No. 1; 2015 ISSN 1916-971X E-ISSN 1916-9728 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Pessimism Shocks in a Model of Global Macroeconomic Interdependence Rod Tyers1 1 Business School, University of Western Australia and Research School of Economics, Australian National University, Australia Correspondence: Rod Tyers, Business School, University of Western Australia, Perth, M251 Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Tel: 61-8-6488-5632. E-mail: [email protected] Received: September 22, 2014 Accepted: October 28, 2014 Online Published: December 25, 2014 doi:10.5539/ijef.v7n1p37 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v7n1p37 Abstract Insights into the four-region strategic behaviour that drives global economic performance can be derived from applications of the elemental multi-region, macroeconomic simulation model introduced in this paper. It has a global general equilibrium structure that embodies bilateral linkages between represented regions via both trade and investment. It is applied to strategic monetary policy during the post-GFC period, which has been characterised in the US, the EU and Japan by increased aversion to downside risk, the stochastic equivalent of pessimism over prices, disposable income levels and capital returns. The retention of full employment in the pessimistic regions is shown to require very considerable monetary expansions and these tend to flood the other regions with liquidity, temporarily raising their terms of trade, real consumption and investment while appreciating their real exchange rates. The results further suggest elements of a coordination game structure amongst the big four economies in which equilibria are characterised by collective monetary responses and deviations are punished via reduced output and employment.
    [Show full text]