Rehabilitation and Augmentation of Butere, Musanda and Navakholo Water Supply Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rehabilitation and Augmentation of Butere, Musanda and Navakholo Water Supply Systems REPUBLIC OF KENYA Public Disclosure Authorized LAKE VICTORIA NORTH WATER SERVICES BOARD WATER AND SANITATION SERVICES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized (WaSSIP) REHABILITATION AND AUGMENTATION OF BUTERE, MUSANDA AND NAVAKHOLO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) Public Disclosure Authorized Client / Employer: Consulting Engineers: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CES / MANGAT, I.B. PATEL & PARTNERS JV LAKE VICTORIA NORTH WATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS SERVICES BOARD P.O. BOX 48674, 00100 – GPO P.O. BOX 673 - 50100 NAIROBI, KENYA KAKAMEGA TEL.: +254-20-2710500 / 1, FAX: +254-20-2710549 KENYA EMAIL: [email protected] MARCH 2011 EIA / EMP BUTERE, MUSANDA & NAVAKHOLO TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 GENERAL INFORMATION....................................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................1 1.2 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT PROPONENT ................................................................1 1.3 TITLE OF PROJECT ............................................................................................................2 1.4 OVERALL OBJECTIVE OF PROJECT ....................................................................................2 1.5 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................2 1.6 LOCATION OF PROJECT .....................................................................................................2 1.7 PROJECT MANAGER ..........................................................................................................2 1.8 PROJECT MANAGER ’S REPRESENTATIVE ..........................................................................2 1.9 CONTRACTOR ...................................................................................................................2 1.10 PROJECT COST ................................................................................................................2 1.11 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS ..................................................................................................3 1.12 RELEVANT BANK OPERATIONAL POLICIES .........................................................................3 1.13 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY (EHS) G UIDELINES ..............................................4 2 BASELINE SURVEY..............................................................................................................1 2.1 PROJECT AREA .................................................................................................................1 2.1.1 Administrative Description ..........................................................................................1 2.1.2 Socio Economic Infrastructure....................................................................................1 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE ..............................................................................................2 2.2.1 Butere Town and Musanda Trading Centre - Butere/Mumias District.......................2 2.2.2 Navakholo Trading Centre - Kakamega District.........................................................3 2.2.3 Water Resources ........................................................................................................4 2.3 POPULATION AND WATER DEMAND ...................................................................................6 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT OF EXISTING FOR BUTERE , M USANDA AND NAVAKHOLO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS .........................................................................................................................7 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................................1 3.1 SCOPE OF PROJECT .........................................................................................................1 3.1.1 Butere Works ..............................................................................................................1 3.1.2 Musanda and Navakholo Works.................................................................................1 4 POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES ...........................1 4.1 MAJOR ELEMENTS OF THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT .................................................1 4.2 MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ..........................................................1 4.3 POSSIBLE SEVERITY , D ISTRIBUTION AND DURATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ..........1 4.4 POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................1 5 THE NO-PROJECT OPTION .................................................................................................1 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) ..............................................................1 CES/MIBP JV i EIA / EMP BUTERE, MUSANDA & NAVAKHOLO ANNEX 1 - MINUTES OF STAKEHOLDERS MEETING CES/MIBP JV i EIA / EMP BUTERE, MUSANDA & NAVAKHOLO GENERAL INFORMATION Introduction The Government of the Republic of Kenya (GoK) has mainstreamed its National Water Policy to envisage 100% access to safe water for the Country’s population by 2030. To achieve this target, the GoK has been implementing a far reaching sector reform program since 2002 aimed at harmonizing the Management of Water Resources and Water Supply and Sanitation (WSS) throughout the Country. This reform has been propelled by the Water Act (2002), which aims at harmonizing the Management of Water Resources and Water Supply and Sanitation Services. The World Bank has been supporting the GoK in its Water Sector Reforms through financing of programmes towards improvement of Water and Sanitation Services in the Country. In this regard, the (GoK) and World Bank, through the International Development Association (IDA), have agreed on the implementation of the Water and Sanitation Services Improvement Project (WaSSIP). This Project aims at supporting the Water Sector Reform effort by achieving the following three objectives namely: (i) Increase access to reliable, affordable and sustainable Water Supply and Sanitation Services. (ii) Improve the Water and Wastewater Services. (iii) Institutional Strengthening and capacity building of Water Service Providers, within the Lake Victoria North Water Services Board (LVNWSB) area of jurisdiction. One of the activities identified under Component (3) is – Rehabilitation and Augmentation of Butere, Musanda and Navakholo Water Supply Systems. LVNWSB has undertaken Detailed Designs and prepared Tender Documents and Drawings for the Works. LVNWSB is in the process of procuring a Contractor for the Implementation of these Works. The present Water Services in Butere, Musanda and Navakholo are under extreme pressure due to the high population increase, development and growth over the last decade. In addition, sections of the system are either dilapidated or require urgent rehabilitation due to normal wear, tear and age. The problems are at times compounded by interference with the existing infrastructure such as damage to appurtenances etc. The suppressed water supply in some areas affects the well being and living standards of the population in these areas. Name and Address of Project Proponent Chief Executive Officer Lake Victoria North Water Services Board (LVNWSB) Off Kakamega – Kisumu Road P.O. Box 673 – 50100 KAKAMEGA, Kenya Tel.: +254-56-30795 / 31552 ; Fax: +254-56-31506 E-mail: [email protected] CES/MIBP JV 1 EIA / EMP BUTERE, MUSANDA & NAVAKHOLO Title of Project Rehabilitation and Augmentation of Butere, Musanda and Navakholo Water Supply Systems Contract No. NC / PH III / LOT 6 / Butere, Musanda and Navakholo (C) Overall Objective of Project The overall objective of the Project is to expand treated water output and transmit the same to supply Butere, Musanda and Navakholo Towns and part of their environs. Project Development The following Reports have been prepared as part of Project Development: • Inception Report • Final Design Report • Tender (Bid) Documents for Implementation of Works Location of Project The Project Location Plan is shown in Figure 1.1 on page 1-5. Project Manager Chief Executive Officer Lake Victoria North Water Services Board (LVNWSB) Off Kakamega – Kisumu Road P.O. Box 673 – 50100 KAKAMEGA, KENYA Tel.: +254-56-30795 / 31552 Fax: +254-56-31506 E-mail: [email protected] Project Manager’s Representative (To be appointed) Contractor (To be appointed) Project Cost The Contract Price based on Final Design (Exclusive of Contingencies) for the Works is Kshs 107,406,658. CES/MIBP JV 2 EIA / EMP BUTERE, MUSANDA & NAVAKHOLO Public Consultations Pursuant to Legislative Requirements, a Stakeholders’ Meeting was held on 21st July 2010 in Butere for Stakeholders interested in the Project to allow for their active interaction for the Project to move to Construction Stage. Minutes of the Stakeholders’ Meeting are given in this Report as Annex 1 . Relevant Bank Operational Policies The following are the relevant World Bank Operational Policies that have been taken into account in this Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) / Environmental Management Plan (EMP). 1. OP/BP 4.01 Environmental Assessment (January 1999) Environmental Assessment is one of the 10 safeguard policies of the World Bank. The objective of the World Bank Environment and Social Safeguard Policies is to improve decision making, to ensure
Recommended publications
  • THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered As a Newspaper at the G.P.O.)
    SPECIAL ISSUE THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered as a Newspaper at the G.P.O.) Vol. CXXII—No. 80 NAIROBI, 30th April, 2020 Price Sh. 60 GAZETTE NOTICE NO. 3306 CAUSE NO. 1258 OF 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI By (1) Mary Wanjiru Omondi and (2) Vani Atieno Judith Omondi, both of P.O. Box 30621–00100, Nairobi in Kenya, the deceased’s PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION widow and daughter, respectively, through Messrs. Mary Wanjiru TAKE NOTICE that applications having been made in this court Omondi, advocate of Nairobi, for a grant of letters of administration in: intestate to the estate of James Pascal Omondi, late of Kiambu, who died at District Hospital, Kiambu in Kenya, on 30th July, 2016. CAUSE NO. 84 OF 2015 CAUSE NO. 1279 OF 2019 By Grace Njambi Ng’ang’a, of P.O. Box 291–00232, Ruiru in Kenya, the deceased’s daughter, through Messrs. F. N. Kimani & By (1) Jane Jepkosgei Keitany and (2) Margaret Jerotich Keitany, Associates, advocates of Nairobi, for a grant of letters of both of P.O. Box 54465–00200, Nairobi in Kenya, the deceased’s administration intestate to the estate of Naftali Ng’ang’a, late of sisters, through Messrs. Kivuva Omuga & Co., advocates of Nairobi, Nairobi, who died at Kenyatta National Hospital in Kenya, on 5th for a grant of letters of administration intestate to the estate of Florence December, 1982. Jemchor Keitany alias Florence J. Keitany, late of Nairobi, who died at Kenyatta National Hospital in Kenya, on 22nd February, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Voters Per Constituency for 2017 General Elections
    REGISTERED VOTERS PER CONSTITUENCY FOR 2017 GENERAL ELECTIONS COUNTY_ CONST_ NO. OF POLLING COUNTY_NAME CONSTITUENCY_NAME VOTERS CODE CODE STATIONS 001 MOMBASA 001 CHANGAMWE 86,331 136 001 MOMBASA 002 JOMVU 69,307 109 001 MOMBASA 003 KISAUNI 126,151 198 001 MOMBASA 004 NYALI 104,017 165 001 MOMBASA 005 LIKONI 87,326 140 001 MOMBASA 006 MVITA 107,091 186 002 KWALE 007 MSAMBWENI 68,621 129 002 KWALE 008 LUNGALUNGA 56,948 118 002 KWALE 009 MATUGA 70,366 153 002 KWALE 010 KINANGO 85,106 212 003 KILIFI 011 KILIFI NORTH 101,978 182 003 KILIFI 012 KILIFI SOUTH 84,865 147 003 KILIFI 013 KALOLENI 60,470 123 003 KILIFI 014 RABAI 50,332 93 003 KILIFI 015 GANZE 54,760 132 003 KILIFI 016 MALINDI 87,210 154 003 KILIFI 017 MAGARINI 68,453 157 004 TANA RIVER 018 GARSEN 46,819 113 004 TANA RIVER 019 GALOLE 33,356 93 004 TANA RIVER 020 BURA 38,152 101 005 LAMU 021 LAMU EAST 18,234 45 005 LAMU 022 LAMU WEST 51,542 122 006 TAITA TAVETA 023 TAVETA 34,302 79 006 TAITA TAVETA 024 WUNDANYI 29,911 69 006 TAITA TAVETA 025 MWATATE 39,031 96 006 TAITA TAVETA 026 VOI 52,472 110 007 GARISSA 027 GARISSA TOWNSHIP 54,291 97 007 GARISSA 028 BALAMBALA 20,145 53 007 GARISSA 029 LAGDERA 20,547 46 007 GARISSA 030 DADAAB 25,762 56 007 GARISSA 031 FAFI 19,883 61 007 GARISSA 032 IJARA 22,722 68 008 WAJIR 033 WAJIR NORTH 24,550 76 008 WAJIR 034 WAJIR EAST 26,964 65 008 WAJIR 035 TARBAJ 19,699 50 008 WAJIR 036 WAJIR WEST 27,544 75 008 WAJIR 037 ELDAS 18,676 49 008 WAJIR 038 WAJIR SOUTH 45,469 119 009 MANDERA 039 MANDERA WEST 26,816 58 009 MANDERA 040 BANISSA 18,476 53 009 MANDERA
    [Show full text]
  • 12146361 02.Pdf
    Proposed Development Plans Water Supply Development Plan Urban Water Supply Development (32 Urban Centers) 1) Rehabilitation (30 UC) 699,000 m3/day 2) Expansion (29 UC) 1,542,000 m3/day 3) New Construction (2 UC) 19,000 m3/day 4) Service Population 17.01 million Rural Water Supply (10 Counties) 1) Large Scale 209,000 m3/day 2) Small Scale 110,000 m3/day 3) Target Population 4.04 million Sanitation Development Plan Sewerage Development (25 Urban Centers) 1) Rehabilitation (6 UC) 244,000 m3/day 2) Expansion (6 UC) 715,000 m3/day 3) New Construction (19 UC) 430,000 m3/day 4) Service Population 16.26 million On-site Sanitation (10 Counties) 1) Installation of Proper On-site Sanitation Facilities by Individual or Communities 2) Target Population 4.28 million Irrigation Development Plan Large Scale Irrigation Area 1) Large Scale Irrigation 37,280 ha (4 Projects) MA -MA F - 33 2) Small Scale Irrigation 6,484 ha (10 Counties) 3) Private Sector Irrigation 2,344 ha (10 Counties) P Hydropower Development Plan 1) Munyu Multipurpose Dam Project 40MW 2) Thwake Multipurpose Dam Project 20MW Water Resources Development Plan 1) Storage Dams 16 nos. (1,689 MCM) 2) Small Storage Dams and 1,880 nos. Pans (94 MCM) 3) Boreholes 350 nos. (35 MCM/year) 4) Inter-basin Transfer 168 MCM/year (from Tana CA to Nairobi, Ext.) 5) Intra-basin Transfer 37 MCM/year (from Mzima Spring to Mombasa/Kwale/Ukunda, Ext.) 6) Intra-basin Transfer 31 MCM/year (from Athi R. to Mombasa/ Malindi/Kilifi/Mtwapa, Ext.) 7) Desalination for Mombasa 93 MCM/year LEGEND Dam(Existing) Water
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of 100 Tachoni Proverbs and Wise Sayings
    A COLLECTION OF 100 TACHONI PROVERBS AND WISE SAYINGS By ANNASTASI OISEBE African Proverbs Working Group NAIROBI, KENYA AUGUST, 2017. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to acknowledge and thank the relentless effort for all those who played a major part in completion of this document. My utmost thanks go to Fr. Joseph G. Healey, both financial and moral support. My special thanks goes to CephasAgbemenu, Margaret Ireri and Elias Bushiri who guided me accordingly to ensure that my research was completed. Furthermore I also want to thank Edwin Kola for his enormous assistance, without forgetting publishers of Tachoni proverbs and resources who made this research possible. DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my parents Anthony and Margret Oisebe and the entire African Proverbs working group Nairobi and all readers of African literature. INTRODUCTION Location The Tachoni (We shall be back in Kalenjin) are Kalenjins assimilated by Luhya people of Western Kenya, sharing land with the Bukusu tribe. They live mainly in Webuye, Chetambe Hills, Ndivisi (of Bungoma County) and the former Lugari District in the Kakamega County. Most Tachoni clans living in Bungoma speak the 'Lubukusu' dialect of the Luhya language making them get mistaken as Bukusus. They spread to Trans-Nzoia County especially around Kitale, Mumias and Busia. The ethnic group is rich in beliefs and taboos. The most elaborate cultural practice they have is circumcision. The ethnographical location of the Tachoni ethnic group in Kenya Myth of Origin One of the most common myths among the Luhya group relates to the origin of the Earth and human beings. According to this myth, Were (God) first created Heaven, then Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Mumias Settlement Into an Urban Centre to Circa 1940 Godwin Rapando Murunga
    The evolution of Mumias settlement into an urban centre to circa 1940 Godwin Rapando Murunga To cite this version: Godwin Rapando Murunga. The evolution of Mumias settlement into an urban centre to circa 1940. Geography. 1998. dumas-01302363 HAL Id: dumas-01302363 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01302363 Submitted on 14 Apr 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THE EVOLUTION OF MUMIAS SETTLEMENT INTO AN URBAN CENTRE TO CIRCA 1940 BY GODWIN RAPANDO MURUNGA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MASTER OF ARTS DEGREE AT KENYATTA UNIVERSITY IFRA 111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 IFRA001481 No. d'inventaire Date te0 Cote August 1998 .1 •MS,Har,f..42G. , , (1. R Y 001 l°\1)..j9". E DECLARATION This thesis is my original work, and to the best of my knowlehe, has not been submitted for a degree in any university. GODWIN RAPANDO MURUNGA This thesis has been submitted with my approval as a University supervisor. .4010 PROF.ERIC MASINDE ASEKA iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my wife Carolyne Temoi Rapando and to my sons Tony Wangatia Rapando and Claude Manya Rapando for their patience and constant understanding during the long years of working.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya: Displacement and Humanitarian Response (As of 17 Jan 2008)
    Kenya: Displacement and Humanitarian Response (as of 17 Jan 2008) KENYA GMT +3 S U D A N E T H I O P I A 255,000 IDPs (UN) Estimates from National SITUATION Disasters Operation Centre (15 Jan) • Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Rift Valley: 78,156 Response Plan 2008 totalling Western: 12,271 USD 41.8 million launched on Nyanza: 2,778 Nairobi: 1,976 16 Jan in Nairobi ,to provide Eastern Central: 2,220 humanitarian and Coast: 261 early-recovery assistance to Province some 500,000 affected people. 311 IDP sites est. • Top priorities: food, protection, U G A N D A Rift Valley shelter, water and sanitation, UGANDA disease outbreak prevention Province and non-food items . Western 5,909 refugees • Opposition demonstrations Province (Uganda RCS, 16 Jan) Inadequate power Bukwo North Eastern continue for a second day in supply and lack of Mt Elgon Please note that gures change according Kenya with claims of multiple electrical lights at Manafwa Province to date and source as people are still in ux. killings by police. night poses safety Tororo Malaba Lugari risk for refugees Eldoret Busia Mumias LINKS Kakamega S O M A L I A Kampala Butere Burnt Forest K E N YA • UNCT Situation Report No. 15 Sirisia Meru Siaya • Latest updates for Kenya Kisumu Nakuru INDIAN • Related maps Central • OCHA Kenya Nyanza Province Province OCEAN Lake Narok Migori Disclaimer: Victoria Nairobi Nairobi The boundaries and names shown and the International Boundary designations used on all maps do not imply Province official endorsement or acceptance by the Number of IDPs and Refugees Provincial Boundary United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Kenya Sugar Industry; with Specific Reference to Nyanza
    1 - THE WESTERN KENYA SUGAR INDUSTRY; WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO NYANZA AND WESTERN PROVINCES. .)/ BY i J OBUffl J.C.A. (MRS.) s'... \ * T'TT'T'rn ppr M -9 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PART FULFILMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS, DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI. JANUARY 1980. UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI LIBRARY 0101369 7 'DECLARATION: This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University. 1 (Candidate), Department of Geography. This thesis has been submitted for examination with my approval*as University Supervisor. Department of Geography. Ill ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It gives me great pleasure to acknowledge with gratitude the assistance provided by various institutions and a number of persons. I would like to thank the Research Grants Commitee/ the Univer­ sity of Nairobi which provided the-funds for the field work. To Professor R.B. Ogendo, I ewe a raj or debt of gratitude for his encouragement and excellent supervision throughout: this study. I am most grateful to Professor F.F. Ojany, Mr. D.A. Obara and other members of staff in the Department of Geography for their encouragement and for taking keen interest in my work. Mytlianks are also due to my fellcw post-graduate students in the Department of Geography, whose advice was most valuable. also My thanks are/due to the Government of Kenya and, in particular,.several of its ministries tor providing the necessary . statistical and other required materials. I would also like to thank the Office of the President for offering me a research . permit which rade ny field work a success.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Mumias Agro-Industry in Western Kenya" I
    ) 1 i xil~ "DETERMINANTS OF INTRA-RURAL LABOUR MIGRATION: A CASE STUDY OF MUMIAS AGRO-INDUSTRY IN WESTERN KENYA" I BY / » A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN POPULATION STUDIES AT THE POPULATION STUDIES AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE, UNIVERSITY OF/NAIROBI. / L985 S 7 TO MY PARENTS AND SIBLINGS: YOUR FAITH CARRIED ME THROUGH THE GOOD AND BAD TIMES ‘VsPo’' .*£ \ DECLARATION This Thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University. JOSEPHAT M. NYAGERO This Thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as the University Supervisors. - DR. SHANYISA A. KHASIANI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To specifically mention everyone who assisted me while writing this thesis is impossible. I can only say thanks to them. However, I wish to single out some of these people for special acknowledgements. I wish to thank those who awarded me a two-year scholarship to study at the Population Studies and Research Institute, University of Nairobi, namely; the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA) . Obviously, without their financial support, this work would not have been achieved. Appreciation of roles played by my two supervisors, Dr. J. O. Oucho and Dr. S. A. Khasiani, can hardly be fully expressed. Their patience in going through all my drafts, untiring guidance and constant advice led to the completion of this work. At times, their suggestions and sharp scholarly criticisms almost put me off. However, acting on their advice, I found the work assuming a much satisfying shape and with its present flavour. Thanks to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download List of Physical Locations of Constituency Offices
    INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION PHYSICAL LOCATIONS OF CONSTITUENCY OFFICES IN KENYA County Constituency Constituency Name Office Location Most Conspicuous Landmark Estimated Distance From The Land Code Mark To Constituency Office Mombasa 001 Changamwe Changamwe At The Fire Station Changamwe Fire Station Mombasa 002 Jomvu Mkindani At The Ap Post Mkindani Ap Post Mombasa 003 Kisauni Along Dr. Felix Mandi Avenue,Behind The District H/Q Kisauni, District H/Q Bamburi Mtamboni. Mombasa 004 Nyali Links Road West Bank Villa Mamba Village Mombasa 005 Likoni Likoni School For The Blind Likoni Police Station Mombasa 006 Mvita Baluchi Complex Central Ploice Station Kwale 007 Msambweni Msambweni Youth Office Kwale 008 Lunga Lunga Opposite Lunga Lunga Matatu Stage On The Main Road To Tanzania Lunga Lunga Petrol Station Kwale 009 Matuga Opposite Kwale County Government Office Ministry Of Finance Office Kwale County Kwale 010 Kinango Kinango Town,Next To Ministry Of Lands 1st Floor,At Junction Off- Kinango Town,Next To Ministry Of Lands 1st Kinango Ndavaya Road Floor,At Junction Off-Kinango Ndavaya Road Kilifi 011 Kilifi North Next To County Commissioners Office Kilifi Bridge 500m Kilifi 012 Kilifi South Opposite Co-Operative Bank Mtwapa Police Station 1 Km Kilifi 013 Kaloleni Opposite St John Ack Church St. Johns Ack Church 100m Kilifi 014 Rabai Rabai District Hqs Kombeni Girls Sec School 500 M (0.5 Km) Kilifi 015 Ganze Ganze Commissioners Sub County Office Ganze 500m Kilifi 016 Malindi Opposite Malindi Law Court Malindi Law Court 30m Kilifi 017 Magarini Near Mwembe Resort Catholic Institute 300m Tana River 018 Garsen Garsen Behind Methodist Church Methodist Church 100m Tana River 019 Galole Hola Town Tana River 1 Km Tana River 020 Bura Bura Irrigation Scheme Bura Irrigation Scheme Lamu 021 Lamu East Faza Town Registration Of Persons Office 100 Metres Lamu 022 Lamu West Mokowe Cooperative Building Police Post 100 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Winning Hearts and Minds? Examining the Relationship Between Aid and Security in Kenya Mark Bradbury and Michael Kleinman ©2010 Feinstein International Center
    A PR I L 2 0 1 0 Strengthening the humanity and dignity of people in crisis through knowledge and practice Winning Hearts and Minds? Examining the Relationship Between Aid and Security in Kenya Mark Bradbury and Michael Kleinman ©2010 Feinstein International Center. All Rights Reserved. Fair use of this copyrighted material includes its use for non-commercial educational purposes, such as teaching, scholarship, research, criticism, commentary, and news reporting. Unless otherwise noted, those who wish to reproduce text and image files from this publication for such uses may do so without the Feinstein International Center’s express permission. However, all commercial use of this material and/or reproduction that alters its meaning or intent, without the express permission of the Feinstein International Center, is prohibited. Feinstein International Center Tufts University 200 Boston Ave., Suite 4800 Medford, MA 02155 USA tel: +1 617.627.3423 fax: +1 617.627.3428 fic.tufts.edu Acknowledgements The report has been written by Mark Bradbury and Michael Kleinman, who take responsibility for its contents and conclusions. We wish to thank our co-researchers Halima Shuria, Hussein A. Mahmoud, and Amina Soud for their substantive contribution to the research process. Andrew Catley, Lynn Carter, and Jan Bachmann provided insightful comments on a draft of the report. Dawn Stallard’s editorial skills made the report more readable. For reasons of confidentiality, the names of some individuals interviewed during the course of the research have been withheld. We wish to acknowledge and thank all of those who gave their time to be interviewed for the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Development of Farm Forestry in Lugari District, Kakamega County, Western Kenya
    IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS) e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372. Volume 7, Issue 7 Ver. II (July. 2014), PP 06-13 www.iosrjournals.org Factors Influencing Development of Farm Forestry in Lugari District, Kakamega County, Western Kenya. Otsieno Fredrick Sikuku 1, Musa Gweya Apudo 2 and Gilbert O. Ototo3. 1 Kenya Forestry College, Londiani, Kenya ; 2 School of Natural Resource and Environmental Management, University of Kabianga, P.O. Box 2030 – 20200, Kericho, Kenya; 3School of Natural Resource Management, University of Eldoret, Kenya. Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This study was conducted to establish the factors influencing the development of farm forestry in Lugari Division, Western Kenya. Data was collected between December 2007 to January 2008. Structured questionnaires/schedules, key informant interviewing, and secondary sources of data were used to collect data. All collected data were entered in SPSS 13.5 to facilitate statistical analysis using descriptive statistics such as frequency distributions and cross tabulations. Significant differences between expected and observed attributes were analyzed by non-parametric Chi-square tests. Farm sizes, species preferences, end use of tree products, access to and availability of preferred germplasm and planting materials, availability of resources for raising seedlings, access to extension services, and marketing constraints as well as biological and technical factors such as diseases, pests and planting methodologies were established as important factors influencing farm forestry and tree planting in general, in the division. This study has also demonstrated that farm forestry can be a useful tool for enhancing the livelihoods of many people and contributing to rural development in Lugari, and can be readily adopted if identified challenges can be comprehensively addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lugari Constituency Complete1
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface…………………………………………………………………….. i 1. District Context………………………………………………………… 1 1.1. Demographic characteristics………………………………….. 1 1.2. Socio-economic Profile………………………………………….. 1 2. Constituency Profile………………………………………………….. 1 2.1. Demographic characteristics………………………………….. 1 2.2. Socio-economic Profile………………………………………….. 1 2.3. Electioneering and Political Information……………………. 2 2.4. 1992 Election Results…………………………………………… 2 2.5. 1997 Election Results…………………………………………… 2 2.6. Main problems……………………………………………………. 2 3. Constitution Making/Review Process…………………………… 3 3.1. Constituency Constitutional Forums (CCFs)………………. 3 3.2. District Coordinators……………………………………………. 5 4. Civic Education………………………………………………………… 6 4.1. Phases covered in Civic Education…………………………… 6 4.2. Issues and Areas Covered……………………………………… 6 5. Constituency Public Hearings……………………………………… 7 5.1. Logistical Details…………………………………………………. 5.2. Attendants Details……………………………………………….. 7 5.3. Concerns and Recommendations…………………………….. 7 8 Appendices 31 1. DISTRICT CONTEXT. Lugari Constituency is a constituency in Lugari District. Lugari District is one of 8 districts of the Western Province of Kenya. 1.1. Demographic Characteristics Male Female Total District Population by Sex 105,273 110,647 215,920 Total District Population Aged 18 years & 64,133 63,606 127,739 Below Total District Population Aged Above 18 years 41,140 47,041 88,181 Population Density (persons/Km2) 322 1.2. Socio-Economic Profile Lugari District: • Is one of the least densely populated districts in the
    [Show full text]