DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter One Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter One Introduction Chapter One Introduction The 1960s marked the appearance of movements for the liberation of women in virtually every capitalist country, a phenomenon that had not been seen for half a century. Beginning in North America, this sec- ond wave of militant feminism spread quickly. Great Britain and the nations of Europe reacted first to the North American stimulus, and a new feminist con- sciousness emerged as well in such places as Japan, India, Iran, and Latin America. Although reminis- cent of earlier feminism, the women’s movement of the 1960s and 1970s necessarily constituted a specific response to new social conditions. Not the least of its peculiarities was the existence of a significant trend within it known as socialist feminism or Marxist femi- nism, which sought to merge the two traditions so self-consciously linked together. Socialist feminism, argued its proponents, represents ‘a unique politics that addresses the interconnection of patriarchy and capitalism, with the goal of dealing with sexism, class conflict, and racism’.1 The emergence of a socialist-feminist trend in the late 1960s was an extremely important develop- ment. Socialist feminism stood in solidarity with anti- imperialist and progressive struggles both at home and abroad. Simultaneously, it placed itself in opposition 1. Red Apple Collective 1978, p. 39. While socialism and Marxism are of course not synonymous, I use the terms socialist feminism and Marxist feminism interchangeably, following ordinary practice within the contemporary women’s movement in the United States. Socialist feminism is not, moreover, the exclusive province of women: the New American Movement called itself a socialist-feminist organisation. 2 • Chapter One to a growing radical-feminist tendency that considered male supremacy the root of all human oppression and the main obstacle to female liberation. By the mid-1970s, however, the socialist-feminist movement began to lose some of its momentum and bearings, as anti-imperialist activity receded and as many Marxist women withdrew from socialist-feminist organisations, if not from the women’s movement altogether. The theoretical and organisational perspectives of radical feminism now appeared to offer more guidance to socialist feminists than they had before, particularly on the critical questions of sexuality, inter- personal relations, ideology, and the persistence of male domination through- out history. At the same time, women’s experience in revolutionary movements and socialist countries seemed more removed from immediate socialist-feminist concerns. A certain pessimism regarding the achievements of existing socialist movements and the possibilities of current revolutionary initiatives developed. In this atmosphere, some socialist feminists became persuaded that Marxism could not be transformed or extended by means of the application of feminist insight. They suggested, moreover, that such a goal is not only unattainable, but betrays women’s liberation to the demands of socialism. Whereas social- ist feminism had originated in a commitment to the simultaneous achievement of women’s liberation and socialist revolution, that double commitment now threatened to break apart. This book constitutes an argument for the power of Marxism to analyse the issues that face women today in their struggle for liberation. It strongly rejects, however, the assumption made by many socialists that the classical-Marxist tra- dition bequeaths a more or less complete analysis of the problem of women’s oppression. In this sense, it could be called a socialist-feminist work, although it shares neither the current scepticism among socialist feminists as to the useful- ness of Marxist theory, nor their high hopes for radical-feminist perspectives. Instead, the text argues that the socialist tradition is deeply flawed, that it has never adequately addressed the question of women, but that Marxism can nev- ertheless be used to develop a theoretical framework in which to situate the problems of women’s oppression and women’s liberation. The force and character of the feminist upsurge of the 1960s and 1970s, and of its socialist-feminist component, owe much to the particular circumstances of the post war period. Serious transformations in capitalist domination followed the end of World-War II as the structure of power began to undergo profound changes, both within each nation and internationally. Women, regardless of their class, soon faced significantly altered tasks, expectations, and contradictions. During World-War II, an emergency mobilisation had thrust women into an unprecedented variety of new roles, many of them traditionally the preserve of men. With the War’s end and the return of the soldiers, the situation changed .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More
    THE UNHAPPY MARRIAGE OF MARXISM AND FEMINISM TOWARDS A MORE PROGRESSIVE UNION Heidi I . Hartmann This paper argues that the relation between marxism and feminism has, in all the forms it has so far taken, been an unequal one . While both marxist method and feminist analysis are necessary to an understanding of capi- talist societies, and of the position of women within them, in fact femi- nism has consistently been subordinated . The paper presents a challenge to both marxist and radical feminist work on the "woman question", and argues that what it is necessary to analyse is the combination of patriarchy and capitalism . It is a paper which, we hope, should stimulate considerable debate . The 'marriage' of marxism and feminism has been like the marriage of husband and wife depicted in English common law : marxism and feminism are one, and that one is marxism (1). Recent attempts to integrate marxism and feminism are unsatisfactory to us as feminists because they subsume the feminist struggle into the 'larger' struggle against capital . To continue our simile further, either we need a healthier marriage or we need a divorce . The inequalities in this marriage, like most social phenomena, are no accident . Many marxists typically argue that feminism is at best less impor- tant than class conflict and at worst divisive of the working class . This political stance produces an analysis that absorbs feminism into the class struggle . Moreover, the analytic power of marxism with respect to capital has obscured its limitations with respect to sexism . We will argue here that while marxist analysis provides essential insight into the laws of historical development, and those of capital in particular, the categories of marxism are sex-blind .
    [Show full text]
  • Escaping the Master's House: Claudia Jones & the Black Marxist Feminist
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2017 Escaping the Master’s House: Claudia Jones & The Black Marxist Feminist Tradition Camryn S. Clarke Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Feminist Philosophy Commons, and the Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Camryn S., "Escaping the Master’s House: Claudia Jones & The Black Marxist Feminist Tradition". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2017. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/608 Escaping the Master’s House: Claudia Jones & The Black Marxist Feminist Tradition Camryn S. Clarke Page !1 of !45 Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Abstract ii Introduction 5 To Be Black: Claudia Jones, Marcus Garvey, and Race 14 To Be Woman: Claudia Jones, Monique Wittig, and Sex 21 To Be A Worker: Claudia Jones, Karl Marx, and Class 27 To Be All Three: Claudia Jones and the Black Marxist Feminist Tradition 36 Conclusion 41 Bibliography 44 Page !2 of !45 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I cannot express enough thanks to my advisors for their support, encouragement, and enlightenment: Dr. Donna-Dale Marcano and Dr. Seth Markle. Thank you for always believing in me in times when I did not believe in myself. Thank you for exposing me to Human Rights and Philosophy through the lenses of gender, race, and class globally. Thank you. My completion of this project could not have been accomplished without the support and strength of the Black Women in my life: my great-grandmother Iris, my grandmother Hyacinth, my mother Angela, my sister Caleigh, and my aunt Audrey.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Erenreich, “What Is Socialist Feminism?”
    You are a woman in a capitalist society. For good reasons, then, women are You get pissed off: about the job, about the considering whether or not “socialist bills, about your husband (or ex), about the feminism” makes sense as a political theory. kids’ school, the housework, being pretty, For socialist feminists do seem to be both not being pretty, being looked at, not being sensible and radical—at least, most of them looked at (and either way, not listened to), evidently feel a strong antipathy to some of etc. If you think about all these things and the reformist and solipsistic traps into which how they fit together and what has to be increasing numbers of women seem to be changed, and then you look around for some stumbling. words to hold all these thoughts together in To many of us more unromantic types, the abbreviated form, you almost have to come Amazon Nation, with its armies of strong- up with ‘socialist feminism.’ limbed matriarchs riding into the sunset, (Barbara Erenreich, “What is Socialist is unreal, but harmless. A more serious Feminism?”) matter is the current obsession with the Great Goddess and assorted other objects From all indications a great many women of worship, witchcraft, magic, and psychic have “come up” with socialist feminism phenomena. As a feminist concerned with as the solution to the persistent problem transforming the structure of society, I find of sexism. “Socialism” (in its astonishing this anything but harmless. variety of forms) is popular with a lot of Item One: Over fourteen hundred women people these days, because it has much to went to Boston in April, 1976 to attend a offer: concern for working people, a body of women’s spirituality conference dealing in revolutionary theory that people can point to large part with the above matters.
    [Show full text]
  • De Beauvoir and the Second Sex: a Marxist Interpretation
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL De Beauvoir and The Second Sex: A Marxist Interpretation being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of PhD in the University of Hull by Angela Shepherd, BA (hons) Philosophy, MA Philosophy of Mind and Body December 2015 1 ABSTRACT The Second Sex is Simone de Beauvoir’s seminal text. There have been numerous interpretations and critiques of this text since its inception in 1949. Most notable is the reading of her work as merely incorporating Sartrean existentialism and applying it to the social position of women. However recent theoretical discussion recognises her work as also an exploration of Marxism and this thesis follows that line of argument as, read in this context, the distinctiveness of her philosophical contribution can be made visible. Chapter one, endorses Marx’s historical materialism. Historically variable material conditions lead to historically variable human characteristics. De Beauvoir’s focus is with regard to women. Chapter two introduces the One and Other as a feature of human consciousness and a feature of women’s social oppression. Her account of why this structure explains women’s oppression is inspired by Marx’s historical materialism. Chapter three concerns the myths of femininity which also contribute to women’s oppression and are ideological in the Marxist sense of the word. Myths are productive, yet distorting and false, with the aim being to promote the interests of the powerful at the expense of those who are powerless. Chapter four expresses de Beauvoir’s views on the body insisting that the experience of biology as oppressive is a consequence of what culture makes of the body, again, utilising Marx’s historical materialism.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Liberation of All Women: Socialist Feminism and Materialist Ecofeminism Gina Gaebl St
    Acta Cogitata: An Undergraduate Journal in Philosophy Volume 5 Article 2 2018 On the Liberation of All Women: Socialist Feminism and Materialist Ecofeminism Gina Gaebl St. Mary's College of Maryland Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/ac Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Gaebl, Gina (2018) "On the Liberation of All Women: Socialist Feminism and Materialist Ecofeminism," Acta Cogitata: An Undergraduate Journal in Philosophy: Vol. 5 , Article 2. Available at: http://commons.emich.edu/ac/vol5/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History and Philosophy at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Acta Cogitata: An Undergraduate Journal in Philosophy by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. On the Liberation of All Women: Socialist Feminism and Materialist Ecofeminism Gina Gaebl, St. Mary’s College of Maryland Abstract Feminists of the Western world claim to be striving for the liberation of all women, yet face a number of challenges in the pursuit of truly acting upon this objective. One of these challenges is the way in which western structures, such as capitalism, thrive off of the exploitation of women in developing countries. Other related challenges include the unintentional belittling of the cultures and feminist movements of developing countries through cultural imperialism and culture-blaming. In this paper, I argue that the only version of feminism that truly works for the liberation of all women is socialist feminism. Furthermore, this must be a version of socialist feminism that allows for feminists to approach the dismantling of capitalism in whatever way is most feasible and effective for them to do as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Subjectivity to (Transnational) Governance Networks Mariana Valverde University of Toronto
    UC Irvine Law Review Volume 4 Issue 1 “Law As . .” II, History As Interface for the Article 15 Interdisciplinary Study of Law 3-2014 The Rescaling of Feminist Analyses of Law and State Power: From (Domestic) Subjectivity to (Transnational) Governance Networks Mariana Valverde University of Toronto Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucilr Part of the Law and Gender Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Mariana Valverde, The Rescaling of Feminist Analyses of Law and State Power: From (Domestic) Subjectivity to (Transnational) Governance Networks, 4 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 325 (2014). Available at: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucilr/vol4/iss1/15 This Article and Essay is brought to you for free and open access by UCI Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UC Irvine Law Review by an authorized editor of UCI Law Scholarly Commons. The Rescaling of Feminist Analyses of Law and State Power: From (Domestic) Subjectivity to (Transnational) Governance Networks Mariana Valverde* Introduction .................................................................................................................... 325 I. Feminist Legal Theory Rescaled: Geography, Cultural Difference, and the Invisibilization of “Ordinary” Feminine Subjectivity .................................. 330 II. Whatever Happened to the Critique of Marriage and Domesticity? ............... 344 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 350 INTRODUCTION In the mid- and late 1980s—a time that could arguably be described as the golden age of feminist legal thought, for North America at any rate—empirical researchers as well as theorists were virtually obliged to take sides in the cross- disciplinary debate (or dialogue of the deaf) concerning “postmodernism.”1 The intrafeminist fights often focused on the work of feminist philosopher Judith Butler.
    [Show full text]
  • In Saudi Arabia Madawi Al-Rasheed Excerpt More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76104-8 - A Most Masculine State: Gender, Politics, and Religion in Saudi Arabia Madawi Al-Rasheed Excerpt More information Introduction The ‘Woman Question’ in Saudi Arabia Saudi women often conjure up contradictory images. They are either excluded, heavily veiled victims of their own religion and society, or wealthy, glamorous, cosmopolitan entrepreneurs benefiting from inher- ited wealth and state education. Notwithstanding these sensational ste- reotypes, the 2010 Global Gender Gap Report demonstrates that Saudi women lag behind in economic participation and political empowerment, although in health and educational attainment they may achieve better scores. The country has a very high gender gap index, ranked at 129 out of 134.1 Saudi women remain excluded from full participation in society, despite a recent increase in employment. In 2008, the unemployment rate for women was high, reaching 24.9%.2 Their employment opportunities increased during a four-year period, but women remain underrepresented in the economy in general. Their economic marginalisation is combined with strict rules that affect their lives as women. Their movement, edu- cational choices, employment, and even health are subject to decisions made by their male guardians. In the West, the ban on women driving attracts attention and comment, but the deep-rooted exclusion of women and their subordination at the legal, social, political, and economic levels remains perhaps unmatched in the Muslim world. Throughout the second half of the twentieth century, an early genera- tion of educated Saudi women highlighted their plight and scrutinised 1 Ricardo Hausmann, Laura Tyson, and Saadia Zahidi, The Global Gender Gap Report, Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomism and Anarchy
    Toward Anarchist and Autonomist Marxist Geographies Nathan Clough1 University of Minnesota, Duluth [email protected] Renata Blumberg University of Minnesota, Twin Cities [email protected] Introduction In recent months, the Occupy movement has reinvigorated the imagination of the Left in the United States and elsewhere, by moving radical politics in new directions and creating spaces based upon participatory and non-hierarchical modes of organizing. Anarchist, autonomist Marxist and libertarian socialist ideas have played critical roles in imagining and enacting Occupy spaces, achieving renewed influence in the process. Writing about this turning point in politics for The Nation, Nathan Schneider states: “The anarchists’ way of operating was changing our very idea of what politics could be in the first place. This was exhilarating” (2011 unpaginated online source). This volume brings together geographic scholarship on anarchism and autonomist Marxism for the first time. Even before Occupy Wall Street, anarchism and autonomist Marxism as political ideologies and radical methodologies have been on the rise in the West at least since the 1999 World Trade Organization 1 Published under the Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works Towards Anarchist and Autonomous Marxist Geographies 336 protests in Seattle, when anarchistic protesters exploded onto the international media landscape due to their successful application of direct action tactics to stop the trade ministerial meeting (De Armond, 2001; Sheppard, 2002; Graeber, 2004; Levi, 2006). That anarchism and autonomist Marxism have been deeply implicated in the alter-globalization movement of the past decade cannot be denied. For example, radical movements such as Ya Basta!, the edu-factory movement, European movements of students and precarious workers, and the contemporary Industrial Workers of the World union in the United States have integrated autonomist Marxist theory into their broadly anti-authoritarian and anarcho- syndicalist perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • & Workers' Liberty See Article on Page 3
    So& Wloirkdersa’ Lirbeirtty y No 281 10 April 2013 30p/80p www.workersliberty.org For a workers’ government Thatcher is dead. Marxism and Debate on Kill Thatcherism! the oppressed Syria page 5 pages 6-7 pages 9-10 STOP “BEDROOM See article on page 3 TAX” EVICTIONS! 2 NEWS What is the Alliance for Workers’ Liberty? Who are FEMEN? Today one class, the working class, lives by selling its labour power to another, the capitalist class, which owns the means of production. Society is shaped by the capitalists’ By Elizabeth relentless drive to increase their wealth. Capitalism causes poverty, unemployment, the blighting of lives Butterworth by overwork, imperialism, the destruction of the environment and much else. When Tunisian feminist Against the accumulated wealth and power of the Amina Tyler posted top - capitalists, the working class has one weapon: solidarity. less pictures of herself The Alliance for Workers’ Liberty aims to build solidarity through online with “Fuck Your struggle so that the working class can overthrow capitalism. We want Morals” and “My body be - socialist revolution: collective ownership of industry and services, longs to me and is not a workers’ control and a democracy much fuller than the present system, source of anyone’s hon - with elected representatives recallable at any time and an end to our” written across her bureaucrats’ and managers’ privileges. chest, she received death We fight for the labour movement to break with “social partnership” threats and was put in a and assert working-class interests militantly against the bosses. psychiatric hospital. “Top - Our priority is to work in the workplaces and trade unions, less Jihad Day” was the supporting workers’ struggles, producing workplace bulletins, helping Ukrainian feminist group organise rank-and-file groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Participatory Politics: the Communal Power of Street Art in Revolutionary Egypt, Warring Syria, and Divided Lebanon
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2020 Visualizing Participatory Politics: The Communal Power of Street Art in Revolutionary Egypt, Warring Syria, and Divided Lebanon Erin Baranko Claremont McKenna College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the Islamic World and Near East History Commons Recommended Citation Baranko, Erin, "Visualizing Participatory Politics: The Communal Power of Street Art in Revolutionary Egypt, Warring Syria, and Divided Lebanon" (2020). CMC Senior Theses. 2492. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2492 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Visualizing Participatory Politics: The Communal Power of Street Art in Revolutionary Egypt, Warring Syria, and Divided Lebanon Submitted to Professor Heather Ferguson by Erin Baranko for Senior Thesis Fall 2019 - Spring 2020 May 11, 2020 i Acknowledgements I would like to extent my sincere thanks to Professor Heather Ferguson—an advisor on much more than this thesis. This thesis would not be possible without her continued guidance, wisdom, and compassion. Thank you for teaching me to be reflective and intentional, in writing and in life. Thank you to my family for cultivating my love of learning. I am infinitely grateful to my parents for the sacrifices they have made to provide me the opportunity to study my passions at Claremont McKenna College. To my friends and peers, thank you for believing in this project and in me.
    [Show full text]
  • Module on Marxist and Socialist Feminism
    Details Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Sujata Patel Professor Department of Sociology University of Hyderabad Paper Coordinator Anurekha Chari Assistant Professor Wagh Department of Sociology Centre for Advanced Studies Savitribai Phule Pune University Content Writer/Author Sudeshna Mukherjee Assistant Professor (CW) Centre for Women‘s Studies Bangalore University Content Reviewer (CR) Anurekha Chari Assistant Professor Wagh Department of Sociology Centre for Advanced Studies SavitribaiPhule Pune University Language Editor (LE) Anurekha Chari Assistant Professor Wagh Department of Sociology Centre for Advanced Studies SavitribaiPhule Pune University Module Structure: 1. Introduction , 2. Basic tenets of Marxism and subordination of gender perspective under class perspective, 3. Engel‘s on a) Productive and reproductive labor and b) The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State 4. From Marxism to Marxist Feminism : ( Thinkers: Margaret Benston , Mariarosa Dalla Costa and Selma James) 5. Issues: Socialization of Domestic work Wages for House work Theory of comparable worth 6. From Marxist Feminism to Socialist Feminism 7. Emergence of Socialist Feminism: A synthesis of Marxist Feminism, Radical Feminism and Psychoanalytic Feminism 8. Socialist Feminism on Patriarchy and Capitalism 9. Dual System Theory(Juliett Mitchell , Heidi Hartmann) 10. Unified System Theory(Irish Young , Alison Jagger ) 11. Contemporary Socialist Feminism 12. Critiques of Marxist and Socialist Feminism 13. Socialist feminism in Indian Context (B) Description of Module Items Description of Module Subject Name Sociology Paper Name Sociology of Gender Module Name/ Title Marxist and Socialist Feminism Module ID Pre-requisites Objectives The basic postulates of the Marxian model of class oppression based on economic determinism. Gender blind nature of ‗oppression‘ under Marxism and necessary push initiated by 2 Marxist feminists to address gender based oppression along with class oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxist Feminism and Postmodernism
    Journal of Language and Culture Vol.1(3). pp. 28-34, November, 2010 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/JLC ISSN 2141-6540 ©2010 Academic Journals Review Marxist feminism and postmodernism Mohammad KhosraviShakib Department of Persian Language and Literature, Human Science Faculty, Lorestan University, I. R. Iran. E- mail: Khosravi_fafa@yahoo. Accepted 25 August, 2010 Arguing that it is too easy to release postmodernism as just another example of Western intellectual's separation from activism, this essay considers the connection between feminism and postmodernism as a largely anti-Marxist endeavour. The type of post-modern feminist theory that has blossomed, has presented distinct and well-documented challenges. It has destabilised previously secured categories and encouraged theorists to analyse meaning and relationships of power in a way that has called into question unitary, universal concepts and radically opened discussions concerning subjectivity, sex and gender. Taking into consideration postmodernism as a historically-situated occurrence rather than an intellectual abstraction or movement, the author contends that feminists and their allies need the fragmentation of identities not as a cause for celebration or an oppositional strategy, but rather as an effect of oppressive structures that must be analyzed within the context of their historical, political and economic specificity. It is this tension in postmodernism (between what is expressed and its expression between the latent and manifest) and its parallelism in feminist theory that is the interest of the study. It is the contention of the study that feminist postmodernism, like any other system of thought, has internalised contradictions that heightened during the 1980s and are now becoming self- evident.
    [Show full text]