DOCSLIB.ORG

Module on Marxist and Socialist Feminism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Details Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Sujata Patel Professor Department of Sociology University of Hyderabad Paper Coordinator Anurekha Chari Assistant Professor Wagh Department of Sociology Centre for Advanced Studies Savitribai Phule Pune University Content Writer/Author Sudeshna Mukherjee Assistant Professor (CW) Centre for Women‘s Studies Bangalore University Content Reviewer (CR) Anurekha Chari Assistant Professor Wagh Department of Sociology Centre for Advanced Studies SavitribaiPhule Pune University Language Editor (LE) Anurekha Chari Assistant Professor Wagh Department of Sociology Centre for Advanced Studies SavitribaiPhule Pune University Module Structure: 1. Introduction , 2. Basic tenets of Marxism and subordination of gender perspective under class perspective, 3. Engel‘s on a) Productive and reproductive labor and b) The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State 4. From Marxism to Marxist Feminism : ( Thinkers: Margaret Benston , Mariarosa Dalla Costa and Selma James) 5. Issues: Socialization of Domestic work Wages for House work Theory of comparable worth 6. From Marxist Feminism to Socialist Feminism 7. Emergence of Socialist Feminism: A synthesis of Marxist Feminism, Radical Feminism and Psychoanalytic Feminism 8. Socialist Feminism on Patriarchy and Capitalism 9. Dual System Theory(Juliett Mitchell , Heidi Hartmann) 10. Unified System Theory(Irish Young , Alison Jagger ) 11. Contemporary Socialist Feminism 12. Critiques of Marxist and Socialist Feminism 13. Socialist feminism in Indian Context (B) Description of Module Items Description of Module Subject Name Sociology Paper Name Sociology of Gender Module Name/ Title Marxist and Socialist Feminism Module ID Pre-requisites Objectives The basic postulates of the Marxian model of class oppression based on economic determinism. Gender blind nature of ‗oppression‘ under Marxism and necessary push initiated by 2 Marxist feminists to address gender based oppression along with class oppression. Inadequacies in Marxism and emergence of socialist feminism combining Marxist, Radical and Psychoanalytic Feminisms. Socialist feminism‘s emphasis on both patriarchy and capitalism in explaining women‘s subordination. Keywords Alienation, Capitalism, Marxism, class and class struggle, Dual System Theory, Unified System Theory, Marxist feminism, mode of production, patriarchy, Private Property, Productive Labor, Reproductive labor, sexual division of labor, Socialist Feminism , Socialization of domestic work, Wages for House Work, Comparative Worth, women‘s oppression 3 Marxist and socialist Feminism Module Introduction: Interdisciplinary and intersectionalilty have been influencing feminist theorizing since inception. Feminist theorizing has been reshaped by multiple mainstream theoretical perspectives in its understanding of women‘s oppression. Inability of the liberal welfarism and radical patriarchal feminist agendas of women‘s liberation, paved the ways for Marxist and socialist feminism. Marxist and socialist feminists‘ claim that it is impossible for women, to achieve true freedom in a class-based capitalist society where the powerless many, that produce the wealth, are deprived of it. Private ownership of the means of production by relatively few persons, originally all male, inaugurated a class system whose contemporary manifestations are corporate capitalism and imperialism. Reflection on this state of affairs suggests that capitalism itself, not just the larger social rules that privilege men over women, is the cause of women‘s oppression. Women‘s true liberation demands, the capitalist system must be replaced by a socialist system in which the means of production belong to everyone. No longer economically dependent on men, women will be just as free as men. Basic tenets of Marxism: subordination of gender perspective under class perspective: Marxism, based on influential works by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels (1848) in ‗The Communist Manifesto’ ,Marx (1859) in ‗A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy’ and Engels‘ ‗The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State’ , regard classism rather than sexism as the fundamental cause of women‘s oppression. For the Marxist, material forces— the production and reproduction of social life—are the prime movers in history. In other words, Marx believed a society‘s total mode of production—that is, its forces of production (the raw materials, tools, and workers that actually produce goods) plus its relations of production (the ways in which production is organized)— generates a superstructure (a layer of legal, political, and social ideas) that in turn reinforces the mode of production (Tong,2009). 4 Marx and Engels focused on class struggle as the driving forces of history; they paid scant attention to ―sex class.‖ Shulamith Firestone, a radical feminist, following Marxian dialectics claimed that the material basis for the sexual/political ideology of female submission and male domination was rooted in the reproductive roles of men and women. She proposed to make up for this by developing a feminist version of historical materialism in which sex class, rather than economic class, is the central concept. Firestone said it would take a major biological and social revolution to effect this kind of human liberation. “Historical Materialism is that view of the course of history which seeks the ultimate cause and great moving power of all historical events in the economic development of society, in the changes of the modes of production and exchange, in the consequent division of society into distinct classes, and in the struggles of these classes against one another.” Friedrich Engels (Socialism: Utopian or Scientific, quoted in Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex, pp. 1–12). Historical materialism is that view of the course of history which seeks the ultimate cause and the great moving power of all historical events in the dialectic of sex: the division of society into two distinct biological classes for procreative reproduction, and the struggles of these classes with one another; in the changes in the modes of marriage, reproduction and child care created by these struggles; in the connected development of other physically-differentiated classes (castes); and in the first division of labor based on sex which developed into the (economic-cultural) class system. Shulamith Firestone, (Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex, p. 12). Accordin g to Marxist feminists, women's liberation can only be achieved through a radical restructuring of the current capitalist economy, in which much of women's labor is uncompensated and invisible. In the capitalist system, two types of labor exist. Followed by Engels, Marxist feminists like Margaret Benston and Peggy Morton stressed on: Productive Labor: in which the labor results in goods or services that have monetary value in the capitalist system and are thus compensated by the producers in the form of a paid wage. Reproductive labor: which is associated with the private sphere and involves anything that people have to do for themselves that is not for the purposes of receiving a wage (i.e. cleaning, cooking, having children). Engels- The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State: Although the fathers of Marxism did not take women‘s oppression as seriously as they did workers‘ oppression, but Engels did offer explanations for women‘s oppression. Engels in ―The 5 Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State‖ (1845), showed how changes in the material conditions of people affect the organization of their family relations. Engels speculated that primitive hunting gathering; promiscuous societies may have been not merely matrilineal but also matriarchal societies in which women ruled at the political, social, and economic levels (Tong, 2009). Only when the site of production changed, women lost their advantaged position. Engels said a site change did occur with the advent of agriculture, domestication of animals and the breeding of herds. Somehow, the male-female power balance shifted in favor of men, as men learned to produce more than enough animals to meet the tribe‘s needs for milk and meat. As men‘s work and production grew in importance, the value of women‘s work, production and status of women decreased. With new found social status, suddenly men wanted their own biological children (by imposing control on pre-existing free female sexuality) to get their possessions and exerted enormous pressure to convert society from a matrilineal one into a patrilineal one. Engels presented the ―overthrow of mother right‖ as ―the world-historic defeat of the female sex‖ (Engels, 1845: 118– 119).In this new familial order, said Engels, the husband ruled by virtue of his economic power: ―He is the bourgeois and the wife represents the proletariat‖ (Engels, 1845: 118–119) Engels believed men‘s power over women is rooted in the men‘s control over private property. He believed the oppression of women will cease only with the dissolution of the institution of private property. From Marxism to Marxist Feminism: Classical Marxist feminists work within the conceptual terrain laid out by Marx, Engels, Lenin, and other nineteenth-century thinkers. During the Communist Revolution of 1917 in Russia, women were invited to enter the productive workforce with expectation that economic independence would increase the possibility of women‘s developing self-confidence and viewing themselves as makers of meaningful human history (Tong, 2009). But it was
Recommended publications
  • The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More

    The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More

    THE UNHAPPY MARRIAGE OF MARXISM AND FEMINISM TOWARDS A MORE PROGRESSIVE UNION Heidi I . Hartmann This paper argues that the relation between marxism and feminism has, in all the forms it has so far taken, been an unequal one . While both marxist method and feminist analysis are necessary to an understanding of capi- talist societies, and of the position of women within them, in fact femi- nism has consistently been subordinated . The paper presents a challenge to both marxist and radical feminist work on the "woman question", and argues that what it is necessary to analyse is the combination of patriarchy and capitalism . It is a paper which, we hope, should stimulate considerable debate . The 'marriage' of marxism and feminism has been like the marriage of husband and wife depicted in English common law : marxism and feminism are one, and that one is marxism (1). Recent attempts to integrate marxism and feminism are unsatisfactory to us as feminists because they subsume the feminist struggle into the 'larger' struggle against capital . To continue our simile further, either we need a healthier marriage or we need a divorce . The inequalities in this marriage, like most social phenomena, are no accident . Many marxists typically argue that feminism is at best less impor- tant than class conflict and at worst divisive of the working class . This political stance produces an analysis that absorbs feminism into the class struggle . Moreover, the analytic power of marxism with respect to capital has obscured its limitations with respect to sexism . We will argue here that while marxist analysis provides essential insight into the laws of historical development, and those of capital in particular, the categories of marxism are sex-blind .
  • Escaping the Master's House: Claudia Jones & the Black Marxist Feminist

    Escaping the Master's House: Claudia Jones & the Black Marxist Feminist

    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2017 Escaping the Master’s House: Claudia Jones & The Black Marxist Feminist Tradition Camryn S. Clarke Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Feminist Philosophy Commons, and the Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Camryn S., "Escaping the Master’s House: Claudia Jones & The Black Marxist Feminist Tradition". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2017. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/608 Escaping the Master’s House: Claudia Jones & The Black Marxist Feminist Tradition Camryn S. Clarke Page !1 of !45 Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Abstract ii Introduction 5 To Be Black: Claudia Jones, Marcus Garvey, and Race 14 To Be Woman: Claudia Jones, Monique Wittig, and Sex 21 To Be A Worker: Claudia Jones, Karl Marx, and Class 27 To Be All Three: Claudia Jones and the Black Marxist Feminist Tradition 36 Conclusion 41 Bibliography 44 Page !2 of !45 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I cannot express enough thanks to my advisors for their support, encouragement, and enlightenment: Dr. Donna-Dale Marcano and Dr. Seth Markle. Thank you for always believing in me in times when I did not believe in myself. Thank you for exposing me to Human Rights and Philosophy through the lenses of gender, race, and class globally. Thank you. My completion of this project could not have been accomplished without the support and strength of the Black Women in my life: my great-grandmother Iris, my grandmother Hyacinth, my mother Angela, my sister Caleigh, and my aunt Audrey.
  • Barbara Erenreich, “What Is Socialist Feminism?”

    Barbara Erenreich, “What Is Socialist Feminism?”

    You are a woman in a capitalist society. For good reasons, then, women are You get pissed off: about the job, about the considering whether or not “socialist bills, about your husband (or ex), about the feminism” makes sense as a political theory. kids’ school, the housework, being pretty, For socialist feminists do seem to be both not being pretty, being looked at, not being sensible and radical—at least, most of them looked at (and either way, not listened to), evidently feel a strong antipathy to some of etc. If you think about all these things and the reformist and solipsistic traps into which how they fit together and what has to be increasing numbers of women seem to be changed, and then you look around for some stumbling. words to hold all these thoughts together in To many of us more unromantic types, the abbreviated form, you almost have to come Amazon Nation, with its armies of strong- up with ‘socialist feminism.’ limbed matriarchs riding into the sunset, (Barbara Erenreich, “What is Socialist is unreal, but harmless. A more serious Feminism?”) matter is the current obsession with the Great Goddess and assorted other objects From all indications a great many women of worship, witchcraft, magic, and psychic have “come up” with socialist feminism phenomena. As a feminist concerned with as the solution to the persistent problem transforming the structure of society, I find of sexism. “Socialism” (in its astonishing this anything but harmless. variety of forms) is popular with a lot of Item One: Over fourteen hundred women people these days, because it has much to went to Boston in April, 1976 to attend a offer: concern for working people, a body of women’s spirituality conference dealing in revolutionary theory that people can point to large part with the above matters.
  • A Conversation with Juliet Mitchell

    A Conversation with Juliet Mitchell

    A Conversation with Juliet Mitchell TAMAR GARB and MIGNON NIXON Mignon Nixon: The occasion for this conversation is the publication of Siblings: Sex and Violence (2003), which comes fast on the heels of your groundbreaking study of hysteria, Mad Men and Medusas: Reclaiming Hysteria and the Effects of Sibling Relations on the Human Condition in 2000. In both books you argue that psychoanalysis is trapped in a vertical paradigm that privileges inter- generational relations—parents and children—at the expense of lateral, intragenerational relationships which find their origin in siblings. What galva- nized your thinking about siblings? And how has this turn to the horizontal, lateral dimension of experience affected your thinking about feminism? Juliet Mitchell: Freud says the Oedipus complex opens out onto a social family com- plex. At no point do I want to say that there is not a crucial intergenerational relationship. Of course there is. This is not an attempt to displace that in any sense. It is an attempt to say that at certain points there is an interaction between the intergenerational and the lateral. This idea came from my clini- cal work as a psychoanalyst, from being stuck while trying to understand something about hysteria. It also came very specifically through the question of the male hysteric. But you ask about feminism, so perhaps I should back- track and talk about my relationship to feminism. Nixon: In 1974, you published Psychoanalysis and Feminism, the first major study to consider second-wave feminism and psychoanalysis together. Maybe you could start by telling us what brought you to write that book.
  • GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought

    GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought

    GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought Tuesday, Thursday 12-1.15 Fall Semester 2018 Professor Katrina Forrester Office Hours: Tuesday, Thursday 2-3 Office: CGIS K437 E-mail: [email protected] Teaching Fellow: Leah Downey E-mail: [email protected] Course Description: What is feminism? What is patriarchy? What and who is a woman? How does gender relate to sexuality, and to class and race? Should housework be waged, should sex be for sale, and should feminists trust the state? This course is an introduction to feminist political thought since the mid-twentieth century. It introduces students to classic texts of late twentieth-century feminism, explores the key arguments that have preoccupied radical, socialist, liberal, Black, postcolonial and queer feminists, examines how these arguments have changed over time, and asks how debates about equality, work, and identity matter today. We will proceed chronologically, reading texts mostly written during feminism’s so-called ‘second wave’, by a range of influential thinkers including Simone de Beauvoir, Shulamith Firestone, bell hooks and Catharine MacKinnon. We will examine how feminists theorized patriarchy, capitalism, labor, property and the state; the relationship of claims of sex, gender, race, and class; the development of contemporary ideas about sexuality, identity, and gender; and how and whether these ideas change how fundamental problems in political theory are understood. 1 Course Requirements: Participation (25%) includes (a) active participation in discussion (15%); and (b) weekly responses: each week you will send 2-3 brief questions/ comments about the reading to your TF by 5pm the day before section (10%) Paper 1 (25%) 5-6 pages due October 18 4pm.
  • They Call It Love Wages for Housework and Emotional

    They Call It Love Wages for Housework and Emotional

    THEY CALL IT LOVE WAGES FOR HOUSEWORK AND EMOTIONAL REPRODUCTION ALVA GOTBY A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of West London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2019 1 Abstract This thesis is a study of two sets of literature on capitalism, gender, and emotion. Firstly, it explores the writings of the Wages for Housework (WFH) movement – a network of Marxist feminist activist groups, founded in 1972, whose activity was centred on women’s reproductive labour. Secondly, this thesis draws on the body of writing on emotional labour. Coined by Arlie Hochschild in 1983, this term describes the work of producing emotional states in another person. While WFH were attentive to emotional aspects of reproductive labour, their writings mention emotional labour only in passing. Hochschild’s work concentrates on emotional labour in particular service occupations, but neglects broader issues of social reproduction. Synthesising these bodies of work, I introduce the concept of emotional reproduction, thus applying the WFH perspective to the theme introduced by Hochschild. Emotional reproduction denotes processes across waged and unwaged forms of labour, intended to enhance the relative emotional wellbeing of a recipient, to the extent that they are able to participate in waged labour. These processes often take place in the private sphere, and are constructed as a typically feminine activity. I argue for the importance of understanding these processes as a form of labour, which is integral to capitalist social reproduction. Through the notion of emotional reproduction, this thesis offers an account of gendered subjectivity. It highlights the construction of gendered and historically specific forms of skill, which are essential for emotional labour.
  • An Affective Feminist Materialism?: Reproduction, Marxist Feminism, and Affective Capacity

    An Affective Feminist Materialism?: Reproduction, Marxist Feminism, and Affective Capacity

    An Affective Feminist Materialism?: Reproduction, Marxist Feminism, and Affective Capacity John McMahon, The Graduate Center, CUNY [email protected] Prepared for 2016 Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting **Draft: Please do not cite or circulate without permission Abstract: How can affect theory – particularly a notion of the body understood in terms of affective capacity – extend Marxist feminist concerns with social reproduction? To what extent can affect contribute to different elaborations of Marxist feminism? I answer these questions by theorizing Marxist feminism through affect theory’s embodied concepts of capacity, force, and power. If one of the central tasks of Marxist feminism is to analyze the material basis of patriarchal control, then I contend that affect theory and Marxist feminism are essential to achieving each other’s critical potential. The first part of this paper analyzes the Marxist feminist concept of “social reproduction” in terms of affect. The second part engages an affective reading of three thinkers in the Marxist feminist tradition, rearticulating one particularly vital concept developed by each: Gayle Rubin and the sex/gender system; Lise Vogel and social reproduction; and Rosemary Hennessy and the need for sensation and affect. I conclude by sketching the implications of my reading for the concept of freedom, which is complicated by Black feminist critiques of Marxist feminism. Ultimately this paper – by exploring both the generative connections and the distinct disjunctions between affect and thinkers within Marxist feminism – argues for the continued vitality of Marxist feminism for inquiry into affect, into Marx, into labor, into materialism, and into capitalism. 1 An Affective Feminist Materialism?: Reproduction, Marxist Feminism, and Affective Capacity Introduction Not all bodies circulate, produce, and affectively interact in the same way within the relations and modes of capitalism.
  • Unit 2 Feminism and Psychoanalysis

    Unit 2 Feminism and Psychoanalysis

    Feminist Theories UNIT 2 FEMINISM AND PSYCHOANALYSIS Anu Aneja Structure 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Objectives 2.3 Freud, Psychoanalysis and Feminism 2.3.1 Introduction to Sigmund Freud 2.3.2 Basic Concepts in Freudian Theory 2.3.3 Freud’s Theory of Infantile Sexuality and the Oedipus Complex 2.3.4 Female Sexuality in Freudian Theory 2.3.5 Feminist Detractors of Freud: Kate Millett and Nancy Chodorow 2.4 Lacan and Feminism 2.4.1 Lacan and Psychoanalysis 2.4.2 Lacanian Feminist Theorists: Juliet Mitchell and Jacqueline Rose 2.5 Let Us Sum Up 2.6 Glossary 2.7 Unit End Questions 2.8 References 2.9 Suggested Readings 2.1 INTRODUCTION In the previous block (i.e. Block 4), you have seen how feminist theorists have made significant interventions in different disciplinary areas. In Unit 3 of Block 4, we looked at feminist critiques of knowledge in the humanities, more specifically in the areas of literature, philosophy, and psychoanalysis. In this unit, you will read further about some of the contributions made by feminist theorists who have examined psychoanalytical concepts and theories and attempted to understand their relevance for women. You will also read about the ways in which they have contributed to a critique of some of the gaps and misrepresentations prevalent in these theories. The contributions of feminist theorists will be examined in relationship to the psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan, two major thinkers of the twentieth century whose works have provoked a rich body of diverse feminist responses and counter-theories.
  • Women: the Longest Revolution

    Women: the Longest Revolution

    Juliet Mitchell Women: the Longest Revolution The situation of women is different from that of any other social group. This is because they are not one of a number of isolable units, but half a totality: the human species. Women are essential and irreplaceable; they cannot therefore be exploited in the same way as other social groups can. They are fundamental to the human condition, yet in their economic, social and political roles, they are marginal. It is precisely this combination—fundamental and marginal at one and the same time—that has been fatal to them. Within the world of men their position is comparable to that of an oppressed minority: but they also exist outside the world of men. The one state justifies the other and precludes protest. In advanced industrial society, women’s work is only marginal to the total economy. Yet it is through work that man changes natural conditions and there- by produces society. Until there is a revolution in production, the labour situation will prescribe women’s situation within the world of men. But women are offered a universe of their own: the family. Like woman herself, the family appears as a natural object, but it is actually a cultural creation. There is nothing inevitable about the form or role of the family any more than there is about the character or role of women. It is the function of ideology to present these given social types as aspects of Nature itself. Both can be exalted para- doxically, as ideals. The ‘true’ woman and the ‘true’ family are images of peace and plenty: in actuality they may both be sites of violence and despair.
  • A N Z<+Lote2svz

    A N Z<+Lote2svz

    a n z<+lote2svz no- BETTY FRIEDAN'S ROLE AS REFORMER IN THE WOMEN'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT, 1960-1970 Glenda F. Hodges Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of < the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY June 1980 Approved: Advisor VITA April 12, 1951...............Born - Selma, North Carolina 1972 ......................... B.A. - Virginia State College, Petersburg, Virginia 1972 - 1973 ................. Research Assistant - National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence, Washington, D.C. 1975 ......................... M.A. - Howard University, Washington, D.C. 1975 - 1977 ................. Instructor, Tuskegee Institute, Tuskegee, Alabama 1977 - 1979 ................. Assistant Director, Basic Speech Course, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Interpersonal and Public Communication Studies in Interpersonal Communication. Dr. James Wilcox Studies in Public Address. Dr. Raymond Yeager Studies in Persuasion. Dr. John Rickey Studies in Rhetoric. Dr. Donald Enholm Studies in Human Communication and Research Design. Dr. Raymond Tucker Studies in Business Management. Dr. William Hoskins Ill ABSTRACT The activities of the sixties that addressed the issue of women’s rights have been given considerable attention by historians. These activities called for justice and equality for women through legal reform. Betty Goldstein Friedan, noted women's rights advocater, has been regarded by some historians as one of the leaders that attempted to change status-quo conditions of the sixties, relative to women's equal­ ity. Friedan's publication of The Feminine Mystique, in 1963, cautioned women that they did not have to adhere to society's image that supposedly prescribed their lifestyles. Betty Friedan noted that there is often a discrepancy between what women feel they want to achieve and what society has mandated that they attempt to achieve.
  • The Power of Place: Structure, Culture, and Continuities in U.S. Women's Movements

    The Power of Place: Structure, Culture, and Continuities in U.S. Women's Movements

    The Power of Place: Structure, Culture, and Continuities in U.S. Women's Movements By Laura K. Nelson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kim Voss, Chair Professor Raka Ray Professor Robin Einhorn Fall 2014 Copyright 2014 by Laura K. Nelson 1 Abstract The Power of Place: Structure, Culture, and Continuities in U.S. Women's Movements by Laura K. Nelson Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Berkeley Professor Kim Voss, Chair This dissertation challenges the widely accepted historical accounts of women's movements in the United States. Second-wave feminism, claim historians, was unique because of its development of radical feminism, defined by its insistence on changing consciousness, its focus on women being oppressed as a sex-class, and its efforts to emphasize the political nature of personal problems. I show that these features of second-wave radical feminism were not in fact unique but existed in almost identical forms during the first wave. Moreover, within each wave of feminism there were debates about the best way to fight women's oppression. As radical feminists were arguing that men as a sex-class oppress women as a sex-class, other feminists were claiming that the social system, not men, is to blame. This debate existed in both the first and second waves. Importantly, in both the first and the second wave there was a geographical dimension to these debates: women and organizations in Chicago argued that the social system was to blame while women and organizations in New York City argued that men were to blame.
  • De Beauvoir and the Second Sex: a Marxist Interpretation

    De Beauvoir and the Second Sex: a Marxist Interpretation

    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL De Beauvoir and The Second Sex: A Marxist Interpretation being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of PhD in the University of Hull by Angela Shepherd, BA (hons) Philosophy, MA Philosophy of Mind and Body December 2015 1 ABSTRACT The Second Sex is Simone de Beauvoir’s seminal text. There have been numerous interpretations and critiques of this text since its inception in 1949. Most notable is the reading of her work as merely incorporating Sartrean existentialism and applying it to the social position of women. However recent theoretical discussion recognises her work as also an exploration of Marxism and this thesis follows that line of argument as, read in this context, the distinctiveness of her philosophical contribution can be made visible. Chapter one, endorses Marx’s historical materialism. Historically variable material conditions lead to historically variable human characteristics. De Beauvoir’s focus is with regard to women. Chapter two introduces the One and Other as a feature of human consciousness and a feature of women’s social oppression. Her account of why this structure explains women’s oppression is inspired by Marx’s historical materialism. Chapter three concerns the myths of femininity which also contribute to women’s oppression and are ideological in the Marxist sense of the word. Myths are productive, yet distorting and false, with the aim being to promote the interests of the powerful at the expense of those who are powerless. Chapter four expresses de Beauvoir’s views on the body insisting that the experience of biology as oppressive is a consequence of what culture makes of the body, again, utilising Marx’s historical materialism.