DOCSLIB.ORG

An IRAF Package for the Quantitative Morphology Analysis of Distant Galaxies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An IRAF Package for the Quantitative Morphology Analysis of Distant Galaxies Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VII ASP Conference Series, Vol. 145, 1998 R. Albrecht, R. N. Hook and H. A. Bushouse, eds. GIM2D: An IRAF package for the Quantitative Morphology Analysis of Distant Galaxies Luc Simard UCO/Lick Observatory, Kerr Hall, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, Email: [email protected] Abstract. This paper describes the capabilities of GIM2D, an IRAF package for the quantitative morphology analysis of distant galaxies. GIM2D automatically decomposes all the objects on an input image as the sum of a S´ersic profile and an exponential profile. Each decompo- sition is then subtracted from the input image, and the results are a “galaxy-free” image and a catalog of quantitative structural parameters. The heart of GIM2D is the Metropolis Algorithm which is used to find the best parameter values and their confidence intervals through Monte- Carlo sampling of the likelihood function. GIM2D has been successfully used on a wide range of datasets: the Hubble Deep Field, distant galaxy clusters and compact narrow-emission line galaxies. 1. Introduction GIM2D (Galaxy IMage 2D) is an IRAF package written to perform detailed bulge/disk decompositions of low signal-to-noise images of distant galaxies. GIM2D consists of 14 tasks which can be used to fit 2D galaxy profiles, build residual images, simulate realistic galaxies, and determine multidimensional galaxy selection functions. This paper gives an overview of GIM2D capabili- ties. 2. Image Modelling The first component (“bulge”) of the 2D surface brightness used by GIM2D to model galaxy images is a S´ersic (1968) profile of the form: Σ(r)=Σexp b[(r/r )1=n 1] (1) e {− e − } where Σ(r) is the surface brightness at r. The parameter b is chosen so that re remains the projected radius enclosing half of the light in this component. Thus, the classical de Vaucouleurs profile has n = 4. The second component (“disk”) is an exponential profile of the form: Σ(r)=Σ0exp( r/r )(2) − d where Σ0(r) is the central surface brightness, and rd is the disk scale length. The model has a total of 12 parameters: the total luminosity L, the bulge fraction 108 Copyright 1998 Astronomical Society of the Pacific. All rights reserved. GIM2D: Quantitative Morphology Analysis of Distant Galaxies 109 B/T, the bulge effective radius re, the bulge ellipticity e, the bulge position angle φe,theS´ersic index n, the disk scale length rd, the disk inclination i,the disk position angle φd, the centroiding offsets dx and dy, and the residual sky background level db. Detector undersampling (as in the HST/WFPC2 camera) is taken into ac- count by generating the surface brightness model on an oversampled grid, con- volving it with the appropriate Point-Spread-Function (PSF) and rebinning the result to the detector resolution. 3. Parameter Search with the Metropolis Algorithm The 12-dimensional parameter space can have a very complicated topology with local minima at low S/N ratios. It is therefore important to choose an algorithm which does not easily get fooled by those local minima. The Metropolis Algo- rithm (Metropolis et al. 1953) was designed to search for parameter values in a complicated topology. Compared to gradient search methods, the Metropolis is not efficient i.e., it is CPU intensive. On the other hand, gradient searches are greedy. They will start from initial parameter values, dive in the first minimum they encounter and claim it is the global one. The Metropolis does its best to avoid this trap. The Metropolis in GIM2D starts from an initial set of parameters given by the image moments of the object and computes the likelihood P(w D, M) that the parameter set w is the true one given the data D and the model| M. It then generates random perturbations ∆x about that initial location with a given “temperature”. When the search is “hot”, large perturbations are tried. After each trial perturbation, the Metropolis computes the likelihood value P1 at the new location, and immediately accepts the trial perturbation if P1 is greater than the old value P0. However, if P1 <P0, then the Metropolis will accept the trial perturbation only P1/P0 of the time. Therefore, the Metropolis will sometime accept trial perturbations which take it to regions of lower likelihood, and this apparently strange behavior is very valuable. If the Metropolis finds a minimum, it will try to get out of it, but it will only have a finite probability (related to the depth of the minimum) of succeeding. The step matrix for the trial perturbations ∆x is given by the simple equa- tion ∆x = Q u where the vector u consists of randomly generated numbers between 0 and· 1, and the matrix Q is obtained through Choleski inversion of the local covariance matrix. In short, the sampling of parameter space shapes itself to the local topology. Convergence is achieved when the difference between two likelihood val- ues separated by 100 iterations is less than 3-σ of the likelihood fluctuations. After convergence, the Metropolis Monte-Carlo samples the region where the likelihood is thus maximized and stores the accepted parameter sets as it goes along to build the distribution P(w D, M). Once the region has been suffi- ciently sampled, the Metropolis computes| the median of P (w D, M)foreach model parameter as well as the 99% confidence limits. The output| of the fitting process consists of a PSF-convolved model image O, a residual image R,anda log file containing all Metropolis iterations, the final parameter values and their confidence intervals, and image asymmetry indices. 110 Simard 4. Image Reduction Pipeline GIM2D has a simple image reduction pipeline for HST (or ground-based) images which makes GIM2D particularly suitable for the analysis of archival data: Obtain archival data, combine image stacks and remove cosmic rays. Cos- • mic rays can be removed using tasks such as STSDAS/CRREJ. Run SExtractor (Bertin & Arnouts 1996) on the science image to pro- • duce an object catalog and a “segmentation” image. Pixel values in this segmentation image indicate to which object a given pixel belongs. The segmentation image is used by GIM2D to deblend galaxy images. For HST images, Data Quality Files obtained with a science image stack • can be combined and apply to the SExtractor segmentation image. Bad pixels identified by the DQF images are excluded from the bulge/disk decompositions. Create a Point-Spread-Function (PSF) for each object. Tiny Tim can be • used for HST images. GIM2D accepts three types of PSFs: Gaussian, Tiny Tim and user-specified. Run bulge/disk decompositions. These decompositions are run under an • IRAF script which can be sent to multiple computers so that they can simultaneously work on the same science image. Create a residual image. The GIM2D task GRESIDUAL creates a galaxy- • subtracted version of the input image `alaDAOPHOT. GRESIDUAL sums up all the output galaxy model images and subtracts this sum from the original image. The resulting residual image is extremely useful to visually inspect the residual images of hundreds of objects at a glance. See Figure 1. Determine galaxy selection function. The observed distribution of a pa- • rameter (e.g., bulge fraction) derived from a large number of objects in an image is the intrinsic distribution multiplied by the galaxy selection function which gives the probability that an object with a given set of structural parameters will be detected by SExtractor. GIM2D determines the galaxy selection function by taking an empty background section of the science image, adding simulated galaxies to that image section and running SExtractor to determine whether it would have been detected or not. The resulting multidimensional selection function can then be used to “flat-field” the observed structural parameter distributions. 5. Scientific Results 5.1. Hubble Deep Field Hubble Deep Field F814W images were analyzed with GIM2D (Marleau and Simard 1998). The number of bulge-dominated galaxies is much lower ( 10%) than indicated by qualitative morphological studies. Some of these≤ studies quoted bulge-dominated galaxy fraction as high as 30% (van den Bergh et al. NOAO/IRAF [email protected] Fri Sep 12 00:03:5200:01:44 1997 GIM2D: Quantitative Morphology Analysis of Distant Galaxies 111 cl24w4t - GAL-CLUS-002635+17 cl24w4t_res - GAL-CLUS-002635+17 600 600 400 400 200 200 200 400 600 800 200 400 600 800 z1=-14.23 z2=25.83 ztrans=linear Con=-0.70 Brt=0.67 cmap=Grayscale ncolors=201 z1=-14.23 z2=25.83 ztrans=linear Con=-0.70 Brt=0.67 cmap=Grayscale ncolors=201 -14 -6 1 9 17 25 -14 -6 1 9 17 25 Figure 1. Left: HST/WFPC2/WF4 4400 seconds image of a region in the z = 0.4 cluster CL0024+16. Right: GIM2D residual image. 157 objects were fitted, and galaxies which were too close to the edge of the image were not analyzed. 1996). It was also found that a number of HDF galaxies have surface bright- ness profiles with S´ersic index n 1. Some of them exhibit double exponential profiles which can be easily mistaken≤ for pure bulge systems. However, these systems have spectra resembling those of late-type star-forming galaxies. Other HDF objects are best-fitted with a single n<1component. 5.2. The Distant Cluster CL0024+16 The rich cluster CL0024+16 at z = 0.4 was the perfect testing ground for the galaxy image deblending in GIM2D. CL0024+16 had been extensively studied for gravitational lensing effects, but a quantitative morphological analysis had never been performed. A total of 560 objects were analyzed in two colors with GIM2D, and about 260 objects were large and/or bright enough to produce reliable bulge/disk decompositions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Probing Star Formation and Radio Activity Using Faint Galaxy Redshift Surveys
    Durham E-Theses Probing star formation and radio activity using faint galaxy redshift surveys Davies, Gregory Tudor How to cite: Davies, Gregory Tudor (2008) Probing star formation and radio activity using faint galaxy redshift surveys, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2224/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Probing Star Formation and Radio Activity using Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey by Gregory Tudor Davies A thesis submitted to the University of Durham in accordance with the regulations for admittance to the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Physics University of Durham October 2008 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author or the university to which it was submitted. No quotation from it, or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author or university, and any information derived from it should be acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalog of Mid-Infrared Sources in the Extended Groth Strip
    A catalog of mid-infrared sources in the Extended Groth Strip P. Barmby,1,2 J.-S. Huang,1 M.L.N. Ashby,1 P.R.M. Eisenhardt,3 G.G. Fazio,1 S.P. Willner,1 E.L. Wright4 ABSTRACT The Extended Groth Strip (EGS) is one of the premier fields for extragalactic deep surveys. Deep observations of the EGS with the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope cover an area of 0.38 deg2 to a 50% completeness limit of 1.5 µJy at 3.6 µm. The catalog comprises 57434 objects detected at 3.6 µm, with 84%, 28%, and 24% also detected at 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 µm. Number counts are consistent with results from other Spitzer surveys. Color distributions show that the EGS IRAC sources comprise a mixture of populations: low-redshift star-forming galaxies, quiescent galaxies dominated by stellar emission at a range of redshifts, and high redshift galaxies and AGN. Subject headings: infrared: galaxies — galaxies: high-redshift — surveys — catalogs 1. Introduction Observations of unbiased, flux-limited galaxy samples via ‘blank-field’ extragalactic sur- veys have been a mainstay in the field of galaxy formation and evolution for several decades, with the well-known Hubble Deep Field (Williams et al. 1996) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (York et al. 2000) exemplifying two very different types of galaxy survey. Extending the wavelength coverage as broadly as possible has led to numerous changes in the understand- ing of how galaxies form, evolve, and interact over cosmic time. New technologies and larger telescopes continually increase the volume of discovery space, making some ‘state-of-the-art’ observations obsolete in just a few years.
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th HEAD Meeting Session Table of Contents
    16th HEAD Meeting Sun Valley, Idaho – August, 2017 Meeting Abstracts Session Table of Contents 99 – Public Talk - Revealing the Hidden, High Energy Sun, 204 – Mid-Career Prize Talk - X-ray Winds from Black Rachel Osten Holes, Jon Miller 100 – Solar/Stellar Compact I 205 – ISM & Galaxies 101 – AGN in Dwarf Galaxies 206 – First Results from NICER: X-ray Astrophysics from 102 – High-Energy and Multiwavelength Polarimetry: the International Space Station Current Status and New Frontiers 300 – Black Holes Across the Mass Spectrum 103 – Missions & Instruments Poster Session 301 – The Future of Spectral-Timing of Compact Objects 104 – First Results from NICER: X-ray Astrophysics from 302 – Synergies with the Millihertz Gravitational Wave the International Space Station Poster Session Universe 105 – Galaxy Clusters and Cosmology Poster Session 303 – Dissertation Prize Talk - Stellar Death by Black 106 – AGN Poster Session Hole: How Tidal Disruption Events Unveil the High 107 – ISM & Galaxies Poster Session Energy Universe, Eric Coughlin 108 – Stellar Compact Poster Session 304 – Missions & Instruments 109 – Black Holes, Neutron Stars and ULX Sources Poster 305 – SNR/GRB/Gravitational Waves Session 306 – Cosmic Ray Feedback: From Supernova Remnants 110 – Supernovae and Particle Acceleration Poster Session to Galaxy Clusters 111 – Electromagnetic & Gravitational Transients Poster 307 – Diagnosing Astrophysics of Collisional Plasmas - A Session Joint HEAD/LAD Session 112 – Physics of Hot Plasmas Poster Session 400 – Solar/Stellar Compact II 113
    [Show full text]
  • Important Events in Chile
    No. 87 – March 1997 Important Events in Chile R. GIACCONI, Director General of ESO The political events foreseen in the December 1996 issue of The Messenger did take place in Chile in the early part of December 1996. On December 2, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Chile, Mr. Miguel Insulza, and the Director General of ESO, Professor Riccardo Giacconi, exchanged in Santiago Instruments of Ratification of the new “Interpretative, Supplementary and Amending Agreement” to the 1963 Convention between the Government of Chile and the European Southern Observatory. This agreement opens a new era of co-operation between Chilean and European Astronomers. On December 4, 1996, the “Foundation Ceremony” for the Paranal Observatory took place on Cerro Paranal, in the presence of the President of Chile, Mr. Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle, the Royal couple of Sweden, King Carl XVI Gustaf and Queen Silvia, the Foreign Minister of the Republic of Chile, Mr. José Miguel Insulza, the Ambassadors of the Member States, members of the of the ESO Executive, ESO staff and the Paranal contractors’ workers. The approximately 250 guests heard addresses by Dr. Peter Creo- la, President of the ESO Council, Professor Riccardo Giacconi, Direc- tor General of ESO, Foreign Minis- ter José Miguel Insulza and Presi- dent Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle. The original language version of the four addresses follows this introduction. (A translation in English of the Span- ish text is given on pages 58 and 59 in this issue of The Messenger.) A time capsule whose contents are described in Dr. Richard West's article was then deposited by Presi- dent Frei with the works being bless- ed by the Archbishop of Antofagas- ta, Monsignor Patricio Infante.
    [Show full text]
  • Hubble Space Telescope's
    Hubble Space Telescope’s Top Science Findings When Galileo used his homemade telescope 400 years ago to view mountains on the Moon, satellites cir- cling Jupiter, and a myriad of stars in our Milky Way Galaxy, he launched a revolution that changed our view of an Earth-cen- tered universe. The launch of NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope aboard the space shuttle Discovery 17 years ago initiated another revolution in astronomy. For the first time, a large telescope that sees in visible light be- gan orbiting above Earth’s distorting atmosphere, which blurs starlight and makes images appear fuzzy. Astronomers anticipated great discoveries from Hubble. The telescope has delivered as promised and continues serving up new discoveries. Astronomers and astrophysicists using Hubble data have published more than 4,000 scientific papers, on top- ics from the solar system to the very distant universe. The following list highlights some of Hubble’s greatest achievements. 2 Hubble Space Telescope’s Top Science Findings Shining a Light on Dark Matter Astronomers used Hubble to make the first three-dimensional map of dark matter, which is considered the construction scaffolding of the universe. Dark matter’s invisible gravity allows normal matter in the form of gas and dust to collect and build up into stars and galaxies. The Hubble telescope played a starring role in helping to shed light on dark matter, which is much more abundant than normal matter. Although astronomers cannot see dark matter, they can detect it in galaxy clusters by observ- ing how its gravity bends the light of more distant background galaxies, a phenomenon called gravitational lensing.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 28 Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility
    January 2001 Number 28 Page 1 Number 28 January 2001 This 140 nm ultraviolet image of Jupiter was taken with the Hubble Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) on 26 November 1998 (Credit: NASA; ESA & John T. Clarke, Univ. of Michigan) when Jupiter was at a distance of 700 million km from Earth. In addition to the main auroral oval, centred on the magnetic north pole, and a pattern of more diffuse emission inside the polar cap, unique features are the ‘magnetic footprints’ of three of Jupiter’s satellites, Io, Ganymede and Europa. Space Telescope ST-ECF Newsletter ST-ECF European Coordinating Facility Page 2 ST–ECF Newsletter European news As the ESA contribution to HST moves away Group and, in September, by the Space Science Advisory from hardware provision, support for another Committee that NGST be selected as the next ‘Flexi-mission’ project has been agreed for the ST-ECF. in ESA’s future plan for implementation between 2008 and Following the successful provision of a 2013. This selection was endorsed by the Science Programme software package for extraction of NICMOS Committee at its meeting in October. grism spectra (NICMOSLook, see ST-ECF Newsletter 24, p. 7, This approval has allowed ESA to follow up the industry 1997), support for the spectroscopic modes of the ACS will studies it funded during 1999 with new investigations also be provided. ACS has both grisms and prisms: the Wide focussed on the specific European contributions to the Field Camera, with a coverage of 3.4' × 3.4', is fitted with a mission. In November, a study of the 1–5µm near-IR multi- grism offering 40Å/pixel resolution (5500–11000Å) over the object spectrograph to be provided by ESA was awarded to a full WFC field; the High resolution Camera (26'' × 29'') consortium headed by Astrium (Munich) and Laboratoire provides 30Å/pix grism spectra and prism spectra with a d’Astronomie Spatiale (Marseille).
    [Show full text]
  • NASA-ATP09-Submitted
    Cover Page for Proposal NASA Proposal Number Submitted to the National Aeronautics and 09-ATP09-0189 Space Administration NASA PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING PROPOSALS This proposal shall be used and disclosed for evaluation purposes only, and a copy of this Government notice shall be applied to any reproduction or abstract thereof. Any authorized restrictive notices that the submitter places on this proposal shall also be strictly complied with. Disclosure of this proposal for any reason outside the Government evaluation purposes shall be made only to the extent authorized by the Government. SECTION I - Proposal Information Principal Investigator E-mail Address Phone Number Joel Primack [email protected] 831-459-2580 Street Address (1) Street Address (2) 1156 High St Physics Department City State / Province Postal Code Country Code Santa Cruz CA 95064-1077 US Proposal Title : Evolution of Structure and of the Cosmic Population of Galactic Spheroids Proposed Start Date Proposed End Date Total Budget Year 1 Budget Year 2 Budget Year 3 Budget Year 4 Budget 01 / 01 / 2010 12 / 31 / 2012 577090.00 168877.00 200832.00 207381.00 0.00 SECTION II - Application Information NASA Program Announcement Number NASA Program Announcement Title NNH09ZDA001N-ATP Astrophysics Theory For Consideration By NASA Organization (the soliciting organization, or the organization to which an unsolicited proposal is submitted) Astrophysics Date Submitted Submission Method Grants.gov Application Identifier Applicant Proposal Identifier 05 / 29 / 2009 Electronic Submission
    [Show full text]
  • Instrument Handbook V7.0
    Version 7.0 October 2004 Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer Instrument Handbook for Cycle 14 Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21218 [email protected] Operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration User Support For prompt answers to any question, please contact the STScI Help Desk. • E-mail: [email protected] • Phone: (410) 338-1082 (800) 544-8125 (U.S., toll free) World Wide Web Information and other resources are available on the NICMOS World Wide Web site: • URL: http://www.stsci.edu/hst/nicmos Revision History Version Date Editors 1.0 June 1996 D.J. Axon, D. Calzetti, J.W. MacKenty, C. Skinner 2.0 July 1997 J.W. MacKenty, C. Skinner, D. Calzetti, and D.J. Axon 3.0 June 1999 D. Calzetti, L. Bergeron, T. Böker, M. Dickinson, S. Holfeltz, L. Mazzuca, B. Monroe, A. Nota, A. Sivaramakrishnan, A. Schultz, M. Sosey, A. Storrs, A. Suchkov. 4.0 May 2000 T. Böker, L. Bergeron, D. Calzetti, M. Dickinson, S. Holfeltz, B. Monroe, B. Rauscher, M. Regan, A. Sivaramakrishnan, A. Schultz, M. Sosey, A. Storrs 4.1 May 2001 A. Schultz, S. Arribas, L. Bergeron, T. Böker, D. Calzetti, M. Dickinson, S. Holfeltz, B. Monroe, K. Noll, L. Petro, M. Sosey 5.0 October 2002 S. Malhotra, L. Mazzuca, D. Calzetti, S. Arribas, L. Bergeron, T. Böker, M. Dickinson, B. Mobasher, K. Noll, L. Petro, E. Roye, A. Schultz, M. Sosey, C. Xu 6.0 October 2003 E. Roye, K. Noll, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Classification of Local Luminous Infrared Galaxies
    A&A 591, A1 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628093 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics Morphological classification of local luminous infrared galaxies A. Psychogyios1, V. Charmandaris1; 2, T. Diaz- Santos3, L. Armus4, S. Haan5, J. Howell6, E. Le Floc’h7, S. M. Petty8, and A. S. Evans9; 10 1 Department of Physics, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece e-mail: [email protected] 2 IAASARS, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Penteli, Greece 3 Núcleo de Astronomía de la Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Diego Portales, Av. Ejército Libertador 441, Santiago, Chile 4 Spitzer Science Center, Calfornia Institute of Technology, MS 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, ATNF, PO Box 76, Epping 1710, Australia 6 Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, MS 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 7 CEA Saclay, DSM/Irfu/Service d’Astrophysique, Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France 8 Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 9 Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA 10 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA Received 8 January 2016 / Accepted 22 February 2016 ABSTRACT We present analysis of the morphological classification of 89 luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs) from the Great Observatories All-sky LIRG Survey (GOALS) sample, using non-parametric coefficients and compare their morphology as a function of wavelength. We rely on images that were obtained in the optical (B- and I-band) as well as in the infrared (H-band and 5.8 µm). Our classification is based on the calculation of Gini and the second order of light (M20) non-parametric coefficients, which we explore as a function of stellar mass (M?), infrared luminosity (LIR), and star formation rate (SFR).
    [Show full text]
  • NICMOS Data Handbook
    Version 5.0 January, 2002 NICMOS Data Handbook Hubble Division 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21218 [email protected] Operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration User Support For prompt answers to any question, please contact the STScI Help Desk. • E-mail: [email protected] • Phone: (410) 338-1082 (800) 544-8125 (U.S., toll free) World Wide Web Information and other resources are available on the Web site: • URL: http://hst.stsci.edu/nicmos. NICMOS Revision History Version Date Editors 3.0 October 1997 Daniela Calzetti 4.0 December 1999 Mark Dickinson 5.0 January 2002 Mark Dickinson, NICMOS Editor Bahram Mobasher, Chief Editor Contributors STScI NICMOS Group (past & present members), including: Santiago Arribas, Eddie Bergeron, Torsten Boeker, Howard Bushouse, Daniela Calzetti, Luis Colina, Mark Dickinson, Sherie Holfeltz, Lisa Mazzuca, Bahram Mobasher, Keith Noll, Antonella Nota, Erin Roye, Chris Skinner, Al Schultz, Anand Sivaramakrishnan, Megan Sosey, Alex Storrs, Anatoly Suchkov, Chun Xu ST-ECF: Wolfram Freudling. Citation In publications, refer to this document as: Dickinson, M. E. et al. 2002, in HST NICMOS Data Handbook v. 5.0, ed. B. Mobasher, Baltimore, STScI Send comments or corrections to: Hubble Division Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21218 E-mail:[email protected] Table of Contents Preface .................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Instrument Overview .................. 1-1 1.1 Instrument Overview ................................................. 1-1 1.2 Detector Readout Modes ......................................... 1-4 1.2.1 MULTIACCUM......................................................... 1-5 1.2.2 ACCUM.................................................................... 1-5 1.2.3 BRIGHTOBJ ............................................................ 1-6 1.2.4 RAMP .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Galaxy Mergers and Morphology at Z< 1.2 in The
    accepted to the Astrophysical Journal A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY MERGERS AND MORPHOLOGY AT Z < 1.2 IN THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP Jennifer M. Lotz1,2, M. Davis3, S.M. Faber4, P. Guhathakurta4, S. Gwyn5, J. Huang6, D.C. Koo4, E. Le Floc’h7,8,9, Lihwai Lin4, J. Newman10, 11 K. Noeske4, C. Papovich9,12, C.N.A. Willmer12, A. Coil11, 12, C. J. Conselice13, M. Cooper3, A. M. Hopkins14, A. Metevier4, 15, J. Primack16, G. Rieke12, B. J. Weiner12 accepted to the Astrophysical Journal ABSTRACT We present the quantitative rest-frame B morphological evolution and galaxy merger fractions at 0.2 <z< 1.2 as observed by the All-wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS). We use the Gini coefficent and M20 to identify major mergers and classify galaxy morphology for a ∗ volume-limited sample of 3009 galaxies brighter than 0.4LB, assuming pure luminosity evolution of 1.3 MB per unit redshift. We find that the merger fraction remains roughly constant at 10 ± 2% for 0.2 <z< 1.2. The fraction of E/S0/Sa increases from 21 ± 3% at z ∼ 1.1 to 44 ± 9% at z ∼ 0.3, while the fraction of Sb-Ir decreases from 64 ± 6% at z ∼ 1.1 to 47 ± 9% at z ∼ 0.3. The majority of z < 1.2 11 Spitzer MIPS 24 µm sources with L(IR) > 10 L⊙ are disk galaxies, and only ∼ 15% are classified as major merger candidates. Edge-on and dusty disk galaxies (Sb-Ir) are almost a third of the red sequence at z ∼ 1.1, while E/S0/Sa make up over 90% of the red sequence at z ∼ 0.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the HST Data Handbooks
    Version 8.0 May 2011 Introduction to the HST Data Handbooks Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21218 [email protected] Operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration User Support For prompt answers to any question, please contact the STScI Help Desk. • Send E-mail to: [email protected]. • Phone: 410-338-1082. • Within the USA, you may call toll free: 1-800-544-8125. World Wide Web Information and other resources are available on the Web site: • URL: http://www.stsci.edu Revision History Version Date Editors 8.0 May 2011 Ed Smith Technical Editors: Susan Rose & Jim Younger 7.0 January 2009 HST Introduction Editors: Brittany Shaw, Jessica Kim Quijano, & Mary Elizabeth Kaiser HST Introduction Technical Editors: Susan Rose & Jim Younger 6.0 January 2006 HST Introduction Editor: Diane Karakla HST Introduction Technical Editors: Susan Rose & Jim Younger. 5.0 July 2004 Diane Karakla and Jennifer Mack, Editors, HST Introduction. Susan Rose, Technical Editor, HST Introduction. 4.0 January 2002 Bahram Mobasher, Chief Editor, HST Data Handbook Michael Corbin, Jin-chung Hsu, Editors, HST Introduction 3.1 March 1998 Tony Keyes 3.0, Vol. II October 1997 Tony Keyes 3.0, Vol. I October 1997 Mark Voit 2.0 December 1995 Claus Leitherer 1.0 February 1994 Stefi Baum Contributors The editors are grateful for the careful reviews and revised material provided by Azalee Boestrom, Howard Bushouse, Stefano Casertano, Warren Hack, Diane Karakla and Matt Lallo. Citation In publications, refer to this document as: Smith, E., et al.
    [Show full text]