DOCSLIB.ORG

<Insert Month, Day and Year>

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
<Insert Month, Day and Year> Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory Report for the East Highline Reservoir Project in El Centro, Imperial County, California Prepared for: Imperial Irrigation District 333 East Barioni Boulevard Imperial, California 92251-0937 Contact: Jessica Lovecchio Prepared by: Matthew DeCarlo, MA; Sarah Siren, MSc; Samantha Murray, MA; and Micah J. Hale, PhD, RPA 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 OCTOBER 2018 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory Report for the East Highline Reservoir Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... V NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE INFORMATION ..................................VII MANAGEMENT SUMMARY .................................................................................................. IX 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ..............................................................1 1.1 Regulatory Context ................................................................................................. 2 1.1.1 36 CFR 800 and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.... 2 1.1.2 Bureau of Reclamation Cultural Resources Management Policy ............. 12 1.1.3 California Register of Historical Resources (California Public Resources Code, Section 5020 et seq.) ..................................................... 14 1.1.4 Native American Historic Cultural Sites (California Public Resources Code, Section 5097 et seq.)....................................................................... 15 1.1.5 California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act ...... 15 1.1.6 California Environmental Quality Act ...................................................... 15 1.1.7 California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 .................................. 20 1.1.8 Paleontological Resources Protection Act ................................................ 20 1.2 Project Personnel .................................................................................................. 20 1.3 Report Structure .................................................................................................... 21 2 SETTING ..........................................................................................................................23 2.1 Natural Setting ...................................................................................................... 23 2.2 Cultural Setting ..................................................................................................... 23 2.2.1 Late Pleistocene ........................................................................................ 23 2.2.2 Terminal Pleistocene to Very Early Holocene.......................................... 24 2.2.3 Mid-Holocene ........................................................................................... 25 2.2.4 Late Holocene ........................................................................................... 25 2.2.5 Ethnohistoric Period.................................................................................. 27 2.2.6 Historic Period .......................................................................................... 27 2.3 Paleontological Setting ......................................................................................... 33 3 RESEARCH DESIGN .....................................................................................................35 3.1 Integrity ................................................................................................................. 35 3.2 Chronological Placement ...................................................................................... 35 3.3 Site Function ......................................................................................................... 36 3.4 Paleoenvironmental Change and Resource Use ................................................... 36 10154-01 i October 2018 Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory Report for the East Highline Reservoir Project TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section Page No. 3.5 Settlement Organization........................................................................................ 37 3.6 Interregional Connections ..................................................................................... 37 4 METHODS .......................................................................................................................39 4.1 South Coastal Information Center Records Search .............................................. 39 4.2 Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search ........................... 39 4.3 Survey ................................................................................................................... 40 4.4 Excavation............................................................................................................. 41 4.5 Laboratory and Cataloging Procedures ................................................................. 41 4.6 Curation................................................................................................................. 42 4.7 Paleontological Resources .................................................................................... 42 5 RESULTS .........................................................................................................................47 5.1 South Coastal Information Center Records Search .............................................. 47 5.2 Tile Drain Construction Maps .............................................................................. 51 5.3 Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search ........................... 52 5.4 Survey ................................................................................................................... 52 5.4.1 Previously Identified Resources ............................................................... 53 5.4.2 Newly Identified Resources ...................................................................... 58 5.5 Archaeological Testing Results ............................................................................ 67 5.6 Paleontological Resources .................................................................................... 68 6 ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................................71 6.1 P-13-017218; A-IMP-12805 ................................................................................. 71 7 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................73 7.1 Cultural Resource Impact Evaluation ................................................................... 73 7.2 Paleontological Resource Impact Evaluation ....................................................... 79 7.3 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................. 80 8 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................87 9 CERTIFICATION ...........................................................................................................91 10154-01 ii October 2018 Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory Report for the East Highline Reservoir Project TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page No. APPENDICES A Project Personnel Qualification B SCIC Records Search Results C NAHC Sacred Lands File Search Results and Tribal Correspondence D New and Updated DPR Site Records E Resources in APE Maps F Paleontological Records Search G Artifact Catalog FIGURES 1 Project Location ...................................................................................................................3 2A Area of Potential Effect .......................................................................................................5 2B Area of Potential Effect .......................................................................................................7 2C Area of Potential Effect .......................................................................................................9 3 Proposed Reservoir Location. Currently a plowed agricultural field. View north. ...................43 4 Northeaster section of proposed reservoir location. View south. ......................................44 5 Proposed intake canal location. Currently an active agricultural field. View east. ...................45 6 All-American Canal. View southwest. ..............................................................................56 7 View of East Highline Canal’s eastern bank from Verde School Road. View northeast. ....................................................................................................................57 8 State Road 98. View southwest. ........................................................................................60 9 P-13-017218 prehistoric ceramic sherds. ...........................................................................61 10 Decorated ceramic rim sherd at P-13-017218. ..................................................................62 11 Eastern terminus of P-13-017219. View west. ..................................................................63 12 View of gate in P-13-017220. View west. .........................................................................64 13 “EHL-Pump2” located at the eastern terminus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Relative Genetic Diversity of the Rare and Endangered Agave Shawii Ssp
    Received: 17 July 2020 | Revised: 9 December 2020 | Accepted: 14 December 2020 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7172 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Relative genetic diversity of the rare and endangered Agave shawii ssp. shawii and associated soil microbes within a southern California ecological preserve Jeanne P. Vu1 | Miguel F. Vasquez1 | Zuying Feng1 | Keith Lombardo2 | Sora Haagensen1,3 | Goran Bozinovic1,4 1Boz Life Science Research and Teaching Institute, San Diego, CA, USA Abstract 2Southern California Research Learning Shaw's Agave (Agave shawii ssp. shawii) is an endangered maritime succulent growing Center, National Park Services, San Diego, along the coast of California and northern Baja California. The population inhabiting CA, USA 3University of California San Diego Point Loma Peninsula has a complicated history of transplantation without documen- Extended Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA tation. The low effective population size in California prompted agave transplanting 4 Biological Sciences, University of California from the U.S. Naval Base site (NB) to Cabrillo National Monument (CNM). Since 2008, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA there are no agave sprouts identified on the CNM site, and concerns have been raised Correspondence about the genetic diversity of this population. We sequenced two barcoding loci, rbcL Goran Bozinovic, Boz Life Science Research and Teaching Institute, 3030 Bunker Hill St, and matK, of 27 individual plants from 5 geographically distinct populations, includ- San Diego CA 92109, USA. ing 12 individuals from California (NB and CNM). Phylogenetic analysis revealed the Emails: [email protected]; gbozinovic@ ucsd.edu three US and two Mexican agave populations are closely related and have similar ge- netic variation at the two barcoding regions, suggesting the Point Loma agave popu- Funding information National Park Services (NPS) Pacific West lation is not clonal.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Potential Coastal Receiver Areas
    4.0 POTENTIAL COASTAL RECEIVER AREAS The San Diego shoreline, including the beaches, bluffs, bays, and estuaries, is a significant environmental and recreational resource. It is an integral component of the area’s ecosystem and is interconnected with the nearshore ocean environment, coastal lagoons, wetland habitats, and upstream watersheds. The beaches are also a valuable economic resource and key part of the region’s positive image and overall quality of life. The shoreline consists primarily of narrow beaches backed by steep sea cliffs. In present times, the coastline is erosional except for localized and short-lived accretion due to historic nourishment activities. The beaches and cliffs have been eroding for thousands of years caused by ocean waves and rising sea levels which continue to aggravate this erosion. Episodic and site- specific coastal retreat, such as bluff collapse, is inevitable, although some coastal areas have remained stable for many years. In recent times, this erosion has been accelerated by urban development. The natural supply of sand to the region’s beaches has been significantly diminished by flood control structures, dams, siltation basins, removal of sand and gravel through mining operations, harbor construction, increased wave energy since the late 1970s, and the creation of impervious surfaces associated with urbanization and development. With more development, the region’s beaches will continue to lose more sand and suffer increased erosion, thereby reducing, and possibly eliminating their physical, resource and economic benefits. The State of the Coast Report, San Diego Region (USACE 1991) evaluated the natural and man- made coastal processes within the region. This document stated that during the next 50 years, the San Diego region “…is on a collision course.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Coulter's 1832 Visits
    Thomas Coulter’s Visits in 1832 the “narrow valley” of the San Luis Rey River, then crossed the Lake Hen- shaw plain and proceeded down the San Felipe valley to Vallecitos. En- Thomas Coulter (1793-1843) first came to the San Diego region in during hot days without water or much forage, the group finally passed April 1832, accompanying a group of Americans who purchased mules the Algodones Dunes and arrived south of the confluence of the Gila and and horses from the California missions and were driving them east to Colorado Rivers around May 8, 1832. Coulter camped ten days near pres- be sold in the United States [43]. He was 38 years old. He had arrived in ent-day Yuma while the Americans worked strenuously to ford the river Monterey six months earlier after working for five years in Mexico. at its seasonal height. From there he wrote a letter to de Candolle’s son, Coulter grew up Presbyterian in northeast Ireland and in 1820 be- dated May 16, 1832, saying “...here is nothing, nothing. This is truly the came a medical doctor or surgeon [44]. In 1822 he studied botany at kingdom of desolation” [49]. He then turned back west, accompanying the Jardin des Plantes in Paris and in Geneva under Augustin-Pyramus de Young, Warner, Kit Carson’s older brother Moses Carson, Isaac Williams Candolle (1778–1841), his mentor. In 1824 he took a position as surgeon and a few other men, reaching Pala around May 27. He returned to San for a British mining company and moved to central Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS in the 1830S
    SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds James Lightner San Diego Flora San Diego, California 2013 SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s Preface The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and Our knowledge of the natural environment of the San Diego region H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds in the first half of the 19th century is understandably vague. Referenc- es in historical sources are limited and anecdotal. As prosperity peaked Copyright © 2013 James Lightner around 1830, probably no more than 200 inhabitants in the region could read and write. At most one or two were trained in natural sciences or All rights reserved medicine. The best insights we have into the landscape come from nar- No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form ratives of travelers and the periodic reports of the missions’ lands. They without permission in writing from the publisher. provide some idea of the extent of agriculture and the general vegeta- tion covering surrounding land. ISBN: 978-0-9749981-4-5 The stories of the visits of United Kingdom naturalists who came in Library of Congress Control Number: 2013907489 the 1830s illuminate the subject. They were educated men who came to the territory intentionally to examine the flora. They took notes and col- Cover photograph: lected specimens as botanists do today. Reviewing their contributions Matilija Poppy (Romneya trichocalyx), Barrett Lake, San Diego County now, we can imagine what they saw as they discovered plants we know.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 Photographs in Species Accounts
    Appendix 3 Photographs in Species Accounts Fulvous Whistling-Duck: Captives at Sea World (A. Mercieca). Pied-billed Grebe: Winter-plumaged bird at Mission Bay Greater White-fronted Goose: Fall migrants at sod farm in the (A. Mercieca). Tijuana River valley, 2002 (A. Mercieca). Horned Grebe: Winter-plumaged bird at San Diego Bay Snow Goose: Wintering flock at the south end of the Salton (A. Mercieca). Sea, Imperial Co. (A. Mercieca). Eared Grebe: Winter-plumaged bird at Mission Bay Ross’s Goose: On San Diego Bay shore at Chula Vista (A. Mercieca). (A. Mercieca). Western Grebe: Pair at Sweetwater Reservoir (A. Mercieca). Brant: On San Diego Bay shore at Chula Vista (A. Mercieca). Clark’s Grebe: At Sweetwater Reservoir (A. Mercieca). Canada Goose: Captive at Sea World (A. Mercieca). Laysan Albatross: In eastern tropical Pacific (P. Unitt). Tundra Swan: Captive at Sea World (A. Mercieca). Black-footed Albatross: Near San Clemente Island Wood Duck: Male at Santee Lakes (A. Mercieca). (R. E. Webster). Gadwall: Male at El Cajon (A. Mercieca). Northern Fulmar: Captive at Sea World (K.W. Fink). Eurasian Wigeon: Captive male at Sea World (K. W. Fink). Pink-footed Shearwater: Near San Clemente Island American Wigeon: Male at Wild Animal Park (A. Mercieca). (B. L. Sullivan). Mallard: Female with ducklings at Santee Lakes (A. Mercieca). Flesh-footed Shearwater: Off Fort Bragg, Mendocino Co., Blue-winged Teal: Male at Famosa Slough (A. Mercieca). 17 August 2002 (B. L. Sullivan). Cinnamon Teal: Pair at Wild Animal Park (A. Mercieca). Buller’s Shearwater: On ocean off California (R. E. Webster). Northern Shoveler: Male at Santee Lakes (A.
    [Show full text]
  • <Insert Month, Day and Year>
    APPENDIX A Project Personnel Qualifications Brad Comeau Archaeologist Brad Comeau is an archaeologist with over 9 years’ experience EDUCATION as a field director, archaeological monitor, and laboratory University of Sheffield technician. He has conducted numerous surveys, evaluation MS, Experimental Archaeology, 2012 excavations, and data recoveries, primarily in Southern University of Massachusetts, Amherst California. He has extensive experience in San Diego County, BA, Anthropology, 2004 with additional experience in Riverside County, the Mojave BA, Italian Studies, 2004 Desert, San Joaquin Valley, and Imperial County, as well as CERTIFICATIONS Massachusetts, Arizona, and England. His research interests Occupational Health and Safety include the role of experimentation in archaeology, copper Administration Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response production techniques, and lithic production. 40-hour Course, 2011 City of San Diego, Certified Archaeological Project Experience Monitor, 2009 Development PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Society for American Archaeology, 2012 St. John Garabed Church Project, San Diego County, Bath and Camerton Archaeological California. As field director, conducted site examinations and Society, 2012 limited shovel test pit excavation for an Extended Phase 1 survey; Society for California Archaeology, 2008 directed a crew of two people; prepared a letter report of findings. Rhodes Crossing Update, Rhodes Properties, San Diego, California. As field director, led a crew of two people for a Class III pedestrian survey of 88 acres; coordinated Native American monitor participation; assisted with preparation of Archaeological Resource Management Report (ARMR). Gregory Canyon Landfill Environmental Impact Statement PHI Assessments, PCR Services Corporation, Pala, San Diego, California. As field director, conducted pedestrian survey of proposed landfill; relocated and verified previously recorded sites; led a crew of four people; coordinated with Native American monitors; prepared site forms and site descriptions for ARMR report.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Field State Park, Who Shared an Incredible Amount of Knowledge and Inspiration with Me
    Client: California State Parks Faculty Advisor: Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris A comprehensive project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Urban and Regional Planning Disclaimer: This report was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master in Urban and Regional Planning degree in the Department of Urban Planning at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). It was prepared at the direction of the Department and of California State Parks as a planning client. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department, the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, UCLA as a whole, or the client. 2 Acknowledgments UCLA’s Luskin Center for Innovation provided partial support for this project through a Graduate Research Grant. California State Parks, which provided partial support for the research completed in this project. Anne Marie Tipton, Education Coordinator at Border Field State Park, who shared an incredible amount of knowledge and inspiration with me. Jenny Rigby, of The Acorn Group, who introduced me to this project and worked with me every step of the way, providing advice and guidance, pointed me to important sources of information, and gave thorough and thoughtful edits to this document. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, my faculty advisor for this project, was also my faculty advisor throughout my master’s program. I am so grateful for her advice, guidance, and support over the past two years. My family and friends who encouraged me along the way, and understood when I wasn’t around. And especially to my husband, Charles Thomas, who has been by my side, supporting me every step of the way, and our daughters, Egeria and Emma, who lovingly and patiently were there to cheer me on.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land
    DRECP Proposed LUPA and Final EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the Affected Environment for the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Decision Area and the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) area for cultural resources. These areas overlap, and in the following programmatic discussion are referred to broadly as the “California Desert Region.” More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the DRECP area in every existing environmental context ⎼ from mountain crests to dry lake beds ⎼ and include both surface and subsurface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts (including cultural landscapes and Traditional Cultural Properties) under the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), maintained by the Secretary of the Interior (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation of California prior to prolonged European contact. These resources may include sites and deposits, structures, artifacts, rock art, trails, and other traces of Native American human behavior. In California, the prehistoric period began over 12,000 years ago and extended through the eighteenth century until 1769, when the first Europeans settled in California. Ethnographic resources represent the heritage of a particular ethnic or cultural group, such as Native Americans or African, European, Latino, or Asian immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • CENSUS TRACT REFERENCE MAP: San Diego County, CA 117.06613W
    32.812837N 32.804052N 117.559357W 2010 CENSUS - CENSUS TRACT REFERENCE MAP: San Diego County, CA 117.06613W 91.02 85.10 93.01 85.12 92.01 mi Ave 79.03 85.03 Fer LEGEND Jewell 80.02 85.09 I-805 Nb Off Ra 95.09 S 85.13 Via Bello t 95.11 97.04 Grand G d Av e R e n Fwy 78 e 96.02 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL LABEL STYLE s e rillo 93.06 97.03 Baker e 79.05 l 91.01 ab A 87.01 a v C r 80.06 i i v a nd Av r R e o e m R D o Federal American Indian d 79.08 A g a e i i Zion Ave 80.03 s St L'ANSE RES 1880 163 o D Reservation r b n r a Delfern 97.06 79.10 D Am Ingraham hore S Lom S 87.02 Larkin Pl ond d S 77.02 C D t 86 a R r Off-Reservation Trust Land, r d Friars Rd S 93.05 i n T1880 t Fwy r Corona Oriente Rd a 96.04 d Hawaiian Home Land a l R n o l D n Rd l Center June St i io o d s aj r r is av 91.03 79.07 b M 96.03 N W n o 97.05 a g o e R C i i Elsa Rd a d D Ave R s i n y v Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Area, s a i d S i 88 e n M 92.02 Waring Rd r d a l Alaska Native Village Statistical Area, a Crown Point Dr R P Fairmount s r I o KAW OTSA 5340 d p D d o m Rd e s iu n e tad Tribal Designated Statistical Area r a a s d S l t St S Is o t an Yerba Strand Way s F a e p S r t i io D a s F 5 ro R o ir e g m Santa Dr i P 805 ie o S F i o D el l R u 91.04 d de n State American Indian t B 77.01 90 F d m a a Tama Res 4125 ie rs R C Cam A rdy Ave Reservation y Fria St v 28.01 Ha s s Rio N e i ta d O e Isl c a 55th St L n Hill 35th d e S R n d t a Rd Luc a n 93.04 ille Montezum 76 D State Designated Tribal F 8 20.01 r r o M 89.01 Lumbee STSA 9815 n Statistical
    [Show full text]
  • California Route Log and Finder List
    AARoads/WestCoastRoads.com California State Route Log As of May 2005 Southern/Western Terminus Northern/Eastern Terminus Route Segment Status Route Location Route Location Areas Served Number Huntington Beach, Long Beach, 1 A Both Active/Local I-5 Exit 79, San Juan Capistrano U.S. 101 Exit 62B, El Rio Redondo Beach, Santa Monica, Malibu, Oxnard Exit 72, Emma Wood State Exit 79, Mussel Shoals/Mobil B Not Signed/Active U.S. 101 U.S. 101 Emma Wood State Beach, Seacliff Beach Pier Undercrossing Lompoc, Vandenberg Air Force C Active U.S. 101 Exit 132, Las Cruces U.S. 101 Exit 191A, Pismo Beach Base, Guadalupe Cambria, San Simeon, Big Sur, D Active U.S. 101 Exit 203B, San Luis Obispo I-280 Exit 47B, Daly City Monterey, Santa Cruz, Half Moon Bay Exit 50, San Francisco (19th San Francisco, Golden Gate Park, E Active I-280 U.S. 101 Exit 438, San Francisco Avenue) Presidio Stinson Beach, Point Reyes National F Active U.S. 101 Exit 445B, Sausalito U.S. 101 Leggett Seashore, Bodega Bay, Mendocino, Fort Bragg 2 A Locally Maintained I-10, CA 1 Exits 1A-B, Santa Monica Centinela Avenue Los Angeles City Limits Santa Monica Exit 7, Santa Monica B Both Active/Local Centinela Avenue Los Angeles City Limits U.S. 101 Los Angeles, Beverly Hills Boulevard C Active U.S. 101 Exit 4B, Alvarado Street I-210 La Canada-Flintridge Glendale Freeway D Active I-210 La Canada-Flintridge CA 138 Wrightwood, Angeles Crest Highway 3 A Active CA 36 Peanut CA 299 Douglas City Peanut, Hayfork, Douglas City Weaverville, Whiskeytown Shasta- B Active CA 299 Weaverville City Limits
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]