DOCSLIB.ORG

33536 SP WEB FM 00I-Xii.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
33536 SP WEB FM 00I-Xii.Indd Process Approaches to Consciousness in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Mind Edited by MICHEL WEBER AND ANDERSON WEEKES Process Approaches to Consciousness in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Mind SUNY series in Philosophy George R. Lucas Jr., editor Process Approaches to Consciousness in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Mind Edited by Michel Weber and Anderson Weekes Published by State University of New York Press, Albany © 2009 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publisher. For information, contact State University of New York Press, Albany, NY www.sunypress.edu Production by Cathleen Collins Marketing by Anne M. Valentine Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Process approaches to consciousness in psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind / edited by Michel Weber and Anderson Weekes. p. cm. — (SUNY series in philosophy) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4384-2941-0 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Consciousness. 2. Process philosophy. 3. Psychology. 4. Neurosciences. 5. Philosophy of mind. I. Weber, Michel. II. Weekes, Anderson, 1960– B808.9.P77 2010 126—dc22 2009010131 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 In memoria ingentis ingenii, dedicamus librum hunc ad Alecem MDCDLXXVI – MMVII vi Contents For much of the twentieth century, all sciences, including biology, were obsessed with reductionism: viewing the world at all levels, from the smallest to the largest, as merely a machine made of parts. Take the machine apart, examine the individual pieces, and we would understand how the world works. Reductionism has had many triumphs in under- standing the nature of the parts and how some parts fi t together. It enabled us to build computers and devise powerful medicines for example. But some scientists admit that reductionism falls short of its ultimate goal: understanding how the world works. It falls short because it fails to recognize the connectedness, the unity, that is the deep essence of nature in all realms. Not in the sense of physicists seeking the ultimate fundamental particle or the theory of everything. There is a oneness in nature in the sense of interdependence. —Irene Pepperberg, Alex and Me Contents vii Contents List of Figures and Tables ix Key to Abbreviations of Whitehead’s Work xi Introduction Michel Weber and Anderson Weekes 1 Part I Setting the Stage 1. Process Thought as a Heuristic for Investigating Consciousness Michel Weber and Anderson Weekes 37 2. Whitehead as a Neglected Figure of Twentieth-Century Philosophy Michel Weber and Anderson Weekes 57 3. Consciousness as a Topic of Investigation in Western Thought Anderson Weekes 73 4. Whitehead’s Unique Approach to the Topic of Consciousness Anderson Weekes 137 Part II Psychology and Philosophy of Mind 5. Consciousness as Subjective Form: Whitehead’s Nonreductionist Naturalism David Griffi n 175 6. The Interpretation and Integration of the Literature on Consciousness from a Process Perspective Michael Katzko 201 viii Contents 7. Windows on Nonhuman Minds Donald Redfi eld Griffi n 219 Part III From Metaphysics to (Neuro)Science (and Back Again) 8. Panexperientialism, Quantum Theory, and Neuroplasticity George W. Shields 235 9. The Evolution of Consciousness Max Velmans 261 10. The Carrier Theory of Causation Gregg Rosenberg 273 Part IV Clinical Applications: Consciousness as Process 11. The Microgenetic Revolution in Contemporary Neuropsychology and Neurolinguistics Maria Pachalska and Bruce Duncan MacQueen 295 12. From Coma to Consciousness: Recovery and the Process of Differentiation Avraham Schweiger, Michael Frost, and Ofer Keren 327 13. Consciousness and Rationality from a Process Perspective Michel Weber 345 Part V History (and Future?) of Philosophy 14. Consciousness, Memory, and Recollection According to Whitehead Xavier Verley 387 15. Consciousness and Causation in Whitehead’s Phenomenology of Becoming Anderson Weekes 407 List of Contributors 463 Index 467 Contents ix Figures and Tables Figure 10.1. Depiction of a Center Cell and its Neighborhood on a “Life” World Grid 274 Figure 10.2. Necker Cube 284 Figure 11.1. Schematic Representation of the Three Primary Planes of Evolutionary Development in the Human Brain 301 Figure 11.2. A Microgenetic Model of Behavior 309 Figure 11.3. Medial Cross-section of the Human Brain 312 Figure 11.4. Levels in the Mental State 323 Figure 13.1. The Nuclear Pivotal Model of Normal Consciousness 348 Table 10.1. How the Experiencing of Phenomenal Individuals Fills the Carrier Role 288 Table 12.1. The Homomorphism of the Four Processual Spheres 342 ix x Contents Contents xi Key to Abbreviations of Whitehead’s Works AI Adventures of Ideas, 1933/1967 (New York: The Free Press) CN The Concept of Nature, 1920/1964 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) ESP Essays in Science and Philosophy, 1947 (New York: The Philosophical Library) FR The Function of Reason, 1929/1958 (Boston: Beacon Press) MT Modes of Thought, 1938/1968 (New York: The Free Press) PM Principia Mathematica, 1910–13/1925–1927 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) PNK Principles of Natural Knowledge, 1919/1982 (New York: Dover) PR Process and Reality, 1929/1978 (Corrected edition, New York: The Free Press) PRel The Principle of Relativity, 1922 (Cambridge: The University Press) S Symbolism, Its Meaning and Effect, 1927/1985 (New York: Fordham University Press) SMW Science and the Modern World, 1925/1967 (New York: The Free Press) UA A Treatise on Universal Algebra, 1898/1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) xi Introduction 1 Introduction Michel Weber and Anderson Weekes We introduce this volume with a brief preview of its overall concerns (Section I), followed by a précis of the individual contributions (Section II) and an overview of the most important literature with a similar or related focus (Section III). The preview will show that this is not a collection of specialty scholarship, but a volume rightly intended for the broadest pos- sible learned readership. The uniqueness of its approach is tempered by the generality of its concerns. The précis then situate each contribution in the larger context of the book’s philosophical and interdisciplinary ambitions, while the last section situates the book in the broader context of today’s intellectual landscape, where a growing body of literature reinforces its cause without anticipating its results. In this Introduction, we adopt the following conventions in referring to the chapters that follow. (1) Chapters are identifi ed by authorship. Contribu- tors’ proper names, including those of the editors, refer to their respective contributions to Parts II–V. Proper names do not reference the contributions to Part I, which resulted from collaboration (chapters 1 and 2) or consensus (chapters 3 and 4) between the editors. These chapters in Part I we refer to simply as the contributions of “the editors.” “Contribution(s) of the editors” does not refer their individual contributions in Parts IV and V. (2) Source and locus will not be given for quotations if they are taken from the chapters that follow. Unless otherwise indicated, all quotations in this Introduction are from the named author’s contribution to the present volume. Main Themes of the Book Alfred North Whitehead’s philosophy was a protest against the compart- mentalization of knowledge. A specialized subfi eld of philosophy focused 1 2 Michel Weber and Anderson Weekes on Whitehead interpretation is therefore something of a paradox. Given the daunting complexity of Whitehead’s writing, literal exegesis and historical scholarship aiming at an “immanent” interpretation of his thought have a continuing and obviously important role to play, but Whitehead himself would scarcely recognize such activities as his rightful legacy. A failure of Whiteheadians to be suffi ciently Whiteheadian in this regard may well be the reason Whitehead’s ideas have seemed at times to be threatened with extinction and mostly available in fossil form. If this is changing, it is at least partly because outsiders are storming the museum. Straightaway this has opened vast avenues of new dialogue with unsuspected partners, to which this book bears witness. This volume brings multiple disciplinary perspectives to bear on White- head’s psychology (which, in a way, is his whole philosophy—a metaphysics of experience) in order to analyze it in terms of relevance to contemporary consciousness studies. Accordingly, we have gathered contribution from scholars whose areas of research are diverse and often do not include Whiteheadian process philosophy as a subfi eld of expertise, but whose own intellectual paths have led them to recognize an important kinship with Whitehead. The area of consciousness studies proves to be a busy intersection: a place where one can’t help but meet everything from metaphysics to psycho- therapy. This is not happenstance. It refl ects the nature of the beast we are tracking, and we have not shied from it. This accounts for both the broad scope of the volume and the diversity of its contributions. In important respects, this book complements David Griffi n’s Unsnarling the World-Knot: Consciousness, Freedom, and the Mind-Body Problem (1998), which grew out of an interdisciplinary conference sponsored by the Center for Process Studies at the Claremont Colleges in 1994, “Consciousness in Humans, Animals and Computers. A Scientifi c-Philosophical Conference.” Bringing a Whiteheadian perspective to contemporary consciousness studies, Griffi n effects a broad synthesis of the issues currently under debate and at the same time provides an excellent introduction to Whitehead’s psychology. We reverse directions. Bringing different contemporary perspectives (including Griffi n’s) to bear on Whitehead’s psychology, we replace synthesis with analysis and highlight the richness and polyvalence of Whitehead’s ideas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • William James As American Plato? Scott Sinclair
    WILLIAM JAMES AS AMERICAN PLATO? ______________________________________________________________________________ SCOTT SINCLAIR ABSTRACT Alfred North Whitehead wrote a letter to Charles Hartshorne in 1936 in which he referred to William James as the American Plato. Especially given Whitehead’s admiration of Plato, this was a high compliment to James. What was the basis for this compliment and analogy? In responding to that question beyond the partial and scattered references provided by Whitehead, this article briefly explores the following aspects of the thought of James in relation to Whitehead: the one and the many, the denial of Cartesian dualism, James’s background in physiology, refutation of Zeno’s paradoxes, religious experience, and other kinships. In the end, the author agrees with Robert Neville that James had seminal ideas which could correctly result in a complimentary analogy with Plato. Therefore, a greater focus on the important thought of James is a needed challenge in contemporary philosophy. Michel Weber provided a very helpful article in two parts entitled, “Whitehead’s Reading of James and Its Context,” in the spring 2002 and fall 2003 editions of Streams of William James. Weber began his article with a reference to Bertrand Russell: “When Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) visited Harvard in 1936, ‘there were two heroes in his lectures – Plato and James.’”1 Although he goes on to affirm that Whitehead could have said the same, Weber either overlooks the fact, or is not aware, that Whitehead actually did compare James to Plato in his January 2, 1936 hand-written letter to Charles Hartshorne, as printed by Whitehead’s biographer, Victor Lowe: European philosophy has gone dry, and cannot make any worthwhile use of the results of nineteenth century scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • A Winter with the Swallows
    k AAAA A A AA AAAJl THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELED '* ''** (Henri V of France, Duke of Bordeaux) Born 182O Acquired by Maggs Bros. Ltd. A WINTER WITH THE SWALLOWS. LONDON; Printed by STRANQEWATS AND WALDEN, Castle St. Leicester Sq. ARABS AT PRAYER. FROM A DRAWING BY E. F. BRIDEI.L. A WINTER THE SWALLOWS J-'iinii n Itrnving by /?. L 8. Rodickon. MATILDA BETITAM EDWARDS. LONDON: HURST AND IJLAf'KETT, PUBLISHERS, SUCCESSORS TO HKNRY COLBURN, is, C;REAT MAKI.HOKOUUH STREET.. 1 S(J7. Tlit i-'jl.t f Ti-niitl'tHi> is n*rcid: TO MADAME BODICHON OF ALGIERS. Fain would I link your dear and honoured name or of To some bright page of story song ; That so my praises might not do you wrong, And I might take your thanks and feel no shame. But be my patron, though I feebly praise A time, when with the swallows taking flight, I sought your lovely land that loves the light, And woke anew and lived enchanted days : Ah ! could I tell with what a glory towers The palm-tree flushing gold on purple skies, Or how white temples, each a marvel rise, 'Mid oleanders tipped with rosy flowers. This little book were such for its own sake, A poet well might give an artist take ! 890082 CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Intra Muros Meeting Old Friends Algerian Types Shopping The Little Moorish Girls at their Em- broidery Frames ... 1 CHAPTER II. Christmas Day in Africa How we kept Holiday The Hills and Hedge-rows The Orphans' Home in the Atlas Biblical Associations The Old Man amongst the Ruins .
    [Show full text]
  • Madn Ess, R Eligion, an D Th E Lim Its of R Eas On
    MADNESS, RELIGION, AND THE LIMITS OF REASON EDITED BY JONNA BORNEMARK & SVEN-OLOV WALLENSTEIN SÖDERTÖRN PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Södertörn Philosophical Studies is a book series published under the direction of the Department of Philosophy at Södertörn University. Th e series consists of monographs and anthologies in philosophy, with a special focus on the Continental-European tradition. It seeks to provide a platform for innovative contemporary philosophical research. Th e volumes are published mainly in English and Swedish. Th e series is edited by Marcia Sá Cavalcante Schuback and Hans Ruin. Cover image: Extas - Den Heliga Teresa / Ecstasy - The Holy Theresa, 1988, 75x183 cm, photography and lacquer on board, Maya Eizin Öijer MADNESS, RELIGION, AND THE LIMITS OF REASON SÖDERTÖRN PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES 16 2015 Madness, Religion, and the Limits of Reason Edited by Jonna Bornemark & Sven-Olov Wallenstein SÖDERTÖRN PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES 16 Södertörn University The Library SE-141 89 Huddinge www.sh.se/publications © The authors Cover image: Extas – Den Heliga Teresa / Ecstasy – The Holy Theresa, 1988, 75x183 cm, photography and lacquer on board, Maya Eizin Öijer Graphic Form: Per Lindblom & Jonathan Robson Printed by Elanders, Stockholm 2015 Södertörn Philosophical Studies 16 ISSN 1651-6834 Södertörn Academic Studies 62 ISSN 1650-433X ISBN 978-91-87843-24-2 (print) ISBN 978-91-87843-25-9 (digital) Contents Introduction: Madness, Religion and the Limits of Reason 7 JONNA BORNEMARK & SVEN-OLOV WALLENSTEIN Forget Rationality: Is There Religious Truth? 23 JOHN D. CAPUTO On Enthusiasm 41 MARCIA SÁ CAVALCANTE SCHUBACK Divine Frenzy and the Poetics of Madness 53 ANDERS LINDSTRÖM Ghostly Reason: A Phenomenological Interpretation of Paul and Pneumatology 75 HANS RUIN Matter, Magic and Madness: Giordano Bruno’s Philosophy of Creativity 99 JONNA BORNEMARK The Unjustifiable in a Philosophical Rationality.
    [Show full text]
  • Theorizing Gender Solidarity in Times of Global Power Shift
    International Journal of Communication 8 (2014), 506–523 1932–8036/20140005 Developmental Bodies and the Occupation of Time: Theorizing Gender Solidarity in Times of Global Power Shift KATHERINE REILLY1 Simon Fraser University Global power shift (GPS) offers an opportunity to rethink assumptions underlying feminist theories of solidarity with a view toward more historically engaged theorizing. During the globalist moment, feminist critical theory relied on the idea of “transversity” as a foundation for the theorizing solidarity because it created a bridge between dualities (local–global, rationalism–postmodernism). More recently, feminist critical theory has turned to intersectionality as a means to redress the dualities inherent in transversity. I argue that expressions of transversal solidarity tended to reify historical sedimentation of power, while intersectional theories of solidarity emphasize collective identities at the expense of transformative agendas. Drawing on the work of Mendieta, Kompridis, and Trouillot, I propose we understand gender solidarity in terms of developmental bodies that occupy time such that women can engage with GPS in proactive ways. This resituates communication’s role in solidarity building as a conversation with history rather than a dialogue between identities. Introduction Much of the literature on contemporary global power shift (GPS) has been concerned with whether and how the changing fortunes of nation-states will influence the functioning of international institutions, their regulation of global markets, or the possibility of diplomatic breakdown leading to war (e.g., Altman, 2009; Ferguson, 2009; Hoge, 2004; Ross & Friedberg, 2009). But for critical theories, GPS challenges us to look beyond regime theories when trying to make sense of historical change.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/29/2021 10:30:42AM Via Free Access
    JOBNAME: EE0 d’Aspremont PAGE: 1 SESS: 6 OUTPUT: Wed Jan 30 08:58:14 2019 1. Introduction: The life of international law and its concepts Sahib Singh and Jean d’Aspremont ‘What meaning has the concept of murder, when we are confronted with the mass production of corpses?’1 Hannah Arendt asks this question of her readers as she attempts to understand the workings of totalitarianism. It may, though, also sound apt for today’s international law and its concepts. Contemporary international lawyers ply their trade knowing full well that significant parts of this law are structurally implicated in and perpetuate on-going economic and social injustices. Yet lawyers idealistically and increasingly resort to international law’s promises. How could our greater recourse to concepts such as universality, aggression, development, humanity or rights (to name but a few) not be tinged with a sense of futility? But this would miss Arendt’s point, for her question is a critique of how we are prone to think with concepts. Recourse to the concept of murder in order to understand, explain and evaluate the known horrors of the concentration camps meant giving in to a certain common sense. It was to concede to the ‘great temptation to explain away the intrinsically incredible by means of liberal rationalizations’.2 Modes of thought or attitudes that seek to reduce the complexities (and horrors) of our social world to inadequate categories are not merely unwarranted but potentially dangerous. It is, after all, not inadequate concepts or attempts to grasp the ungraspable and infinitely complex that Arendt indicts, but rather those who would do so by turning away from life and hence responsibility.3 Rather the question becomes: may we think of the relation(s) between concepts, life and living in international law? We broach this question in three sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Thrownness, Attunement, Attention: a Heideggerian Account Of
    Thrownness, Attunement, Attention: A Heideggerian Account of Responsibility Darshan Cowles A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Essex October 2017 Abstract: This thesis argues that Heidegger’s existential analytic of human existence challenges the traditional understanding of responsibility as lying in the power or mastery of the subject. In contrast to secondary literature that attempts to read Heidegger as showing that we take responsibility through some kind of self-determination or control, I argue that Heidegger’s account of our thrownness, and its first-personal manifestation in our attunement, contests such understandings and points to an account of responsibility that does not find its locus in the power of the subject. In light of this, I argue that taking responsibility for our being-in-the-world should be understood as becoming attentive. By emphasizing the ‘movement’ of thrownness and the meaning of this as finding ourselves always already gripped by way of being attuned, my analysis demonstrates the pervasive power of that which is beyond the subject. I show that we must always already find ourselves submitted to particular possibilities and, more fundamentally, to the enigma of being Dasein. From this analysis, and via the work of Harry Frankfurt, I demonstrate how our thrownness speaks against seeing responsibility for our being-in-the-world in terms of choice, rational judgement, or wholeheartedness. A further analysis of anxiety, contrasting with accounts which read it as manifesting a privileged space for freedom and self-determination, emphasizes the revelation of the ‘I’ as essentially bound to what is beyond it.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychiatry* Thomas A
    1 Carlos Morra and Mateo Kreiker 4. Thomas A. Ban: The Birth of a Medical Discipline: Psychiatry* Table of Contents From Cullen’s “neuroses” to Reil’s “psychiaterie” February 22, 2018 Classifications of insanity in the late 18thand early 19th century March 1, 2018 Bayle’s concept of dementia April 5, 2018 Reflexes of the brain March 22, 2018 Sechenov’s re-evaluation of mental faculties March 29, 2018 Thomas A. Ban: The Birth of a Medical Discipline: Psychiatry From William Cullen’s “neuroses” to Johann Christian Reil’s “psychiaterie” Madness may be as old as mankind (Porter 2002). Yet, development of the discipline dedicated to study and treat “madness,” that was to be referred to as “psychiatry,” began only in the late 18th century. Instrumental to this development was William Cullen (1712-1790), a professor of medicine and physics at the University of Edinburgh, in Scotland. Stimulated by the research of Boissier de Sauvages (1706-1767) at the University of Montpellier, in France, who described and classified diseases as botanists describe and classify plants (Sauvages 1768), Cullen (1769, 1777), classified diseases into four classes (pyrexias, neuroses, cachexias and locales), with as many as 19 orders and 132 genera (Doig, Ferguson, Milne and Passmore 1993). Cullen (1772), defined disease as an excess or deficiency of “sensibilities” in his Synopsis Nosologiae Methodicae and in his treatise published in 1777 with the title “First Lines of Practice 2 of Physic” he introduced the term “neuroses” for a class of disease he believed were
    [Show full text]
  • The Apocryphal Whitehead Michel Weberi
    Contact Made Vision: The Apocryphal Whitehead Michel Weberi Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness. It runs through three stages, if it evolves to its final satisfaction. It is the transition from God the void to God the enemy, and from God the enemy to God the companion. (RM 16)1 Introduction The present Whiteheadian dialogue between natural process theology and Whiteheadian scholarship exploits a tangential approach that will provide new ways of contrasting Whitehead’s worldview by adding a third unexpected speaker: Thomas, the Gnostic Jew who wrote his Gospel perhaps as early as 60 years after Jesus’ death and could thus have constituted an earlier corpus than the canonical gospels—and their hypothetical Q.2 Some readers might consider that the price to pay is too high to venture oneself on such a cross-interpretative path: there is no need to impose an unfashionable syncretic burden either on Whitehead or on Thomas; the inflexion required on each of them to bring them together is simply too demanding and totally unscientific anyway. At least four answers immediately come to mind: first, there is no such thing as a totally objective interpretation in these matters (even the “hard-core” scientific enterprise does not completely escape from the social construction of its issues); second, this hermeneutical wager carries important consequences for each party; third, the rapprochement is operational only at the level of the fundamental intuition—of course not at the level of the technicalities (for the most part absent in Thomas anyway); fourth, what matters above all is to highlight new ways of understanding the human condition, not to stick sclerotically to dead abstractions.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants
    “Nature and Value” WORKSHOP 2016 LONDON LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Akeel Bilgrami is the Sidney Morgenbesser Professor of Philosophy at Columbia University, where he is also a Professor on the Committee on Global Thought. He was the Director of the Humanities Center at Columbia University for seven years and is currently the Director of its South Asian Institute. Akeel got a B.A in English Literature from Elphinstone College, Bombay University and went to Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar where he read Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. He has a Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of Chicago. His publications include the books Belief and Meaning (1992), Self-Knowledge and Resentment (2006), and Secularism, Identity and Enchantment (2014). He is due to publish two short books in the near future: What is a Muslim? and Gandhi's Integrity. His long-term future [email protected] work is on the relations between agency, value, and practical reason. Akeel Bilgrami has been leading the NOMIS series of workshops on Nature and Value since 2012. David Bromwich is Sterling Professor of English at Yale University. He received his PhD in Yale, was promoted Mellon Professor of English at Princeton University and returned to Yale where he became Sterling Professor in 2006. David is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He has published widely on Romantic criticism and poetry, and on eighteenth-century politics and moral philosophy. His book Politics by Other Means concerns the role of critical thinking and tradition in higher education, and defends the practice of liberal education against political encroachments from both Left and Right.
    [Show full text]
  • 15Aprhoddercat Autumn21 FO
    FICTION 3 CRIME & THRILLERS 35 NON-FICTION 65 CORONET 91 HODDER STUDIO 99 YELLOW KITE & LIFESTYLE 117 sales information 136 FICTION N @hodderbooks M HodderBooks [ @hodderbooks July 2021 Romantic Comedy . Contemporary . Holiday WELCOME TO FERRY LANE MARKET Ferry Lane Market Book 1 Nicola May Internationally bestselling phenomenon Nicola May is back with a brand new series. Thirty-three-year-old Kara Moon has worked on the market’s flower stall ever since leaving school, dreaming of bigger things. When her good-for-nothing boyfriend cheats on her and steals her life savings, she finally dumps him and rents out her spare room as an Airbnb. Then an anonymous postcard arrives, along with a plane ticket to New York. And there begins the first of three trips of a lifetime, during which she will learn important lessons about herself, her life and what she wants from it – and perhaps find love along the way. Nicola May is a rom-com superstar. She is the author of a dozen novels, all of which have appeared in the Kindle bestseller charts. The Corner Shop in Cockleberry Bay spent 11 weeks at the top of the Kindle bestseller chart and was the overall best-selling fiction ebook of 2019 across the whole UK market. Her books have been translated into 12 languages. 9781529346442 • £7.99 Exclusive territories: Publicity contact: Rebecca Mundy B format Paperback • 384pp World English Language Advance book proofs available on request eBook: 9781529346459 • £7.99 US Rights: Hodder & Stoughton Author lives in Ascot, Berkshire. Author Audio download: Translation Rights: is available for: interview, features, 9781529346466 • £19.99 Lorella Belli, LBLA festival appearances, local events.
    [Show full text]
  • Bergsoniana, 1
    Bergsoniana 1 | 2021 Reassessing Bergson What Bergson Should Have Said to Einstein Steven Savitt Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/bergsoniana/333 DOI: 10.4000/bergsoniana.333 ISSN: 2800-874X Publisher Société des amis de Bergson Electronic reference Steven Savitt, “What Bergson Should Have Said to Einstein”, Bergsoniana [Online], 1 | 2021, Online since 01 July 2021, connection on 14 September 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/bergsoniana/ 333 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/bergsoniana.333 Les contenus de la revue sont mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. WHAT BERGSON SHOULD HAVE SAID TO EINSTEIN1 Steven SAVITT Let me begin by repeating (changing only the name) a paragraph from a recent paper by David Chalmers: I should say that I am not a historian or a serious scholar of Bergson. These are merely some speculative remarks not well-grounded in scholarly attention to Bergson’s texts. But I think the speculative question is interesting. I’m going to sketch one speculative answer. I’m going to be interested to hear from people who know much more about Bergson than I do about whether this speculation has any remote plausibility. If the historical speculation has none, as may well be possible, I think there is still a very interesting philosophical project in the neighbourhood which is itself worthy of attention (Chalmers 2018). My speculative remarks concern the famous debate between Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein that took place in Paris on 6 April 1922. This encounter has recently received a book-length treatment (Canales 2015), but little of the substance of the debate was actually reported in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix! Fyodor Dostoevsky and Vladimir Solovyov*
    Appendix! Fyodor Dostoevsky and Vladimir Solovyov* (In memory of Dr Nicolas M. Zernov, 1898-1980) The volume and scope of critical and commentarial literature devoted to Dostoevsky's thought in the century since his death is clear evidence of the richness and complexity encountered in his works. In the figure of Vladimir Solovyov - both in his person and his writings - we also encounter a high degree of complexity. Tracing the patterns of his thought, we find certain tensions and a number of striking incongruities. Here was - a man who was, at heart, a monarchist, but aroused the anger and suspicions of the Tsar and Holy Synod through his advocacy of theocratic government; a man who embraced so much that was characteristic of the Slavophiles, and yet was a staunch supporter of their arch-enemy, Peter the Great; a man so seemingly keen to reaffirm the worth of contemplative spirituality, but who personally resisted the decision to join a monastery, a step that he at one time regarded as 'flight' from the world. Those who knew Solovyov at first hand stressed what they regarded either as his sanctity or his eccentricity (his chudachestvo ). Accounts of the excitement generated by his university lectures on philosophy certainly show that he commanded a surprising degree of authority and respect. On the other hand, Solovyov had to contend with numerous uncharitable gibes and with accusations to the effect that he had set himself up as a 'prophet'. Perhaps his best response to adverse criticism of this kind was to deflate his *A Paper delivered at the VI Symposium of the International Dostoevsky Society, 9-16 August 1986, University of Nottingham.
    [Show full text]