DOCSLIB.ORG

Milwaukee CFC Booklet 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Milwaukee CFC Booklet 2004 Letter from the Chair My Fellow Colleagues: As employees of the United States of America, we have very few opportunities where we can come together and speak with one voice on an issue upon which we can all agree. As we are all public employees, I would like to think we all have freely chosen to serve the public and as such are concerned about the well being of our fellow citizens. That being assumed, I would like you to join me in supporting the Combined Federal Campaign, our vehicle for showing the general public that we are concerned about our fellow human beings. The one chance where we can come together and make a positive statement about whom we are and show that we do care, in a UNITED VOICE. I know that many of us would like to have more discretionary income than we currently have. We all want the best for our families, but I ask each of you to stop for a moment and consider the strife that many of our fellow human beings experience every day, some in this country and many more abroad. There are so many who need help. I ask you to look into your hearts and find a way to support the Combined Federal Campaign. If we could average just $2 a week ($4 a pay period) per employee, we could raise almost $1 1/2 million, well over the $699,000 goal of last year’s campaign. To do it everyone would have to give. It is easy to rationalize not giving. I have heard, “I give to my favorite charity”, or “I don’t support one of the organizations that gets money from CFC.” I know you can find a charity in CFC that you believe in. If you designate that they get the money then they get the money! Be a donor in your organization, give and ask others to give. Take pride in who you are and who we are. Let’s show Eastern Wisconsin that federal employees give freely of their time, talent and money to help those who need our help. Thank you for making our (yours and mine) drive a success. Colonel John G. Cozad 128th Air Refueling Wing Wisconsin Air National Guard COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN What is CFC? The CFC was established to provide a once-a-year, in the Table of Contents workplace, fund-raising campaign for non-profit, charitable BE A SUPER GIVER!...........................................................4 organizations. PLEDGE CARD INSTRUCTIONS.....................................5 Who is the CFC? All Eastern Wisconsin area: CFC MISSION / INTRODUCTION ....................................6 • Armed Forces Personnel INDEX . .8 • Federal Employees • U.S. Postal Service Employees NATIONAL / INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS..............................................................17 How much should I give? Animal Charities of America . .17 • A personal decision Military, Veterans & Patriotic Service Organizations of America . .19 • A suggestion would be one hour’s pay per month Women, Children & Family Service Charities of America . .20 • Last year’s average annual gift was $184.78 Human & Civil Rights Organizations of America . .22 Conservation & Preservation Charities of America . .24 United Way of America . .27 Why give by payroll deduction? Sports Charities, USA . .28 • It’s a gift that gives all year long Educate America! . .29 • A small periodic donation adds up Human Service Charities of America . .30 • It’s an efficient way to contribute United Service Organizations (USO) . .31 Earth Share . .31 How can my contribution help? National/International Unaffiliated Organizations . .33 An Annual Christian Charities USA . .44 Community Health Charities . .46 Gift of: Provides Christian Service Charities . .47 America’s Charities . .50 $500 Food, clothing and shelter for three, National Black United Federation of Charities . .51 following a disaster. American Red Cross . .52 $50 Membership to a youth club for 40 children. Children First - America’s Charities . .52 $100 36 blankets to children in a refugee camp. Health & Medical Research Charities of America . .53 $150 School books and supplies for eight children for Medical Research Charities . .58 a year. Human Care Charities of America . .59 $200 Two hours a week of speech therapy for a year. Hispanic United Fund . .61 The Arts Federation . .62 $300 60 days transportation for kidney dialysis Children’s Charities of America . .63 treatment. $400 Corn seed to plant, harvest and feed 18 needy INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS . .69 families. Do Unto Others: America’s Emergency Relief, Development and Humanitarian Outreach Agencies . .69 What does your gift mean to you? International Unaffiliated Organizations . .70 Giving the Cost of: Is An Annual Gift of: Aid to Africa . .71 Global Impact . .72 One candy bar per week $36 LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS..............................................74 One Soft drink per week $45 Community Health Charities of Wisconsin ......................................................................74 One can of beer per week $50 Community Shares of Greater Milwaukee........................................................................75 Sheboygan Area United Way.............................................................................................76 One movie per month $90 United Performing Arts Fund............................................................................................77 One pack of cigarettes per week $220 United Way Fox Cities, Inc................................................................................................78 United Way of Greater Milwaukee....................................................................................78 United Way of Lake County..............................................................................................81 United Way of Racine County...........................................................................................82 Remember, when you designate, United Way in Waukesha County......................................................................................83 only the organization you Local Unaffiliated Organizations......................................................................................84 LOCAL FEDERAL specifically select will COORDINATING COMMITTEE ........Inside Back Cover receive your gift, no other. # 3 COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN Be A Super Giver! What is a Federation: An ideal gift to ensure the success of the Combined Federal A federation is a voluntary group of charitable human Campaign is one hour’s pay per month, our Super Giver health and welfare agencies established for the purpose of contribution level. providing common fundraising, administrative, and management services to its members. Federations may be The following guide will help you determine the amount of national, international or local representing local, regional, your Super Giver pledge: national and international agencies. The listing of local organizations representing charitable Annual Gross Standard Bi-Weekly Monthly organizations in Eastern Wisconsin begins on page 74. This Income Guideline Amount Amount listing includes the following counties: Brown, Door, Fond Up to 8,329 $51.00 $1.96 $4.00 du Lac, Jefferson, Kenosha, Manitowoc, Marathon, $8,330 to 10,409 60.00 2.30 5.00 Marinette, Milwaukee, Outagamie, Ozaukee, Racine, 10,410 to 12,499 72.00 2.77 6.00 12,500 to 14,579 84.00 3.23 7.00 Shawano, Sheboygan, Walworth, Washington, Waukesha, 14,580 to 16,669 96.00 3.70 8.00 Waupaca, and Winnebago. The Local organizations will fol- 16,670 to 18,749 108.00 4.15 9.00 low the International organizations. If you wish to designate 18,750 to 20,829 120.00 4.62 10.00 20,830 to 22,219 132.00 5.08 11.00 all or some of the portion of your contribution to a federa- 22,920 to 24,999 144.00 5.54 12.00 tion, record that federation’s code number in one of the 25,000 to 27,079 156.00 6.00 13.00 boxes on your pledge card. 27,080 to 29,169 168.00 6.46 14.00 29,170 to 31,249 180.00 6.92 15.00 31,250 to 33,339 192.00 7.38 16.00 Contributions designated to a federation will be shared in 33,340 to 35,419 204.00 7.85 17.00 accordance with the federation’s policy. 35,420 to 37,499 216.00 8.30 18.00 37,500 to 39,589 228.00 8.77 19.00 39,590 to 41,669 240.00 9.23 20.00 41,670 to 43,749 252.00 9.70 21.00 43,750 to 45,839 264.00 10.15 22.00 45,840 to 47,919 276.00 10.62 23.00 47,920 to 49,999 288.00 11.08 24.00 50,000 to 52,089 300.00 11.54 25.00 52,090 to 54,169 312.00 12.00 26.00 54,170 to 56,249 324.00 12.46 27.00 56,250 to 58,339 336.00 12.92 28.00 58,340 to 60,419 348.00 13.38 29.00 60,420 to 62,499 360.00 13.85 30.00 62,500 to 64,589 372.00 14.30 31.00 64,590 to 66,669 384.00 14.77 32.00 66,670 to 68,749 396.00 15.23 33.00 68,750 to 70,839 408.00 15.70 34.00 70,840 to 72,919 420.00 16.16 35.00 72,920 to 74,999 432.00 16.62 36.00 75,000 to 77,089 444.00 17.08 37.00 77,090 to 79,179 456.00 17.54 38.00 79,180 to 81,249 468.00 18.00 39.00 81,250 to 83,339 480.00 18.46 40.00 83,340 to 85,419 492.00 18.92 41.00 85,420 to 87,499 504.00 19.38 42.00 87,500 to 89,589 516.00 19.85 43.00 89,590 to 91,669 528.00 20.30 44.00 91,670 to 93,749 540.00 20.77 45.00 93,750 to 95,839 552.00 21.23 46.00 95,840 to 97,919 564.00 21.70 47.00 97,920 to 99,999 576.00 22.15 48.00 Every 1 of Us! 100,000 to 102,089 588.00 22.62 49.00 102,090 to 104,169 600.00 23.08 50.00 104,170 to 106,249 612.00 23.54 51.00 106,250 to 108,329 624.00 24.00 52.00 # 4 COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN Pledge Card Instructions Combined Federal Campaign-Eastern Wisconsin Drawer Number 782, Milwaukee, WI 53278-0782 A CFC pledge card identifies the contributor, amount of 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 8364 Licensed Charities As of 3/10/2020 MICS 24404 MICS 52720 T
    8364 Licensed Charities as of 3/10/2020 MICS 24404 MICS 52720 T. Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving, Inc. The David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust USA, Inc. 100 E. Pratt St 25283 Cabot Road, Ste. 101 Baltimore MD 21202 Laguna Hills CA 92653 Phone: (410)345-3457 Phone: (949)305-3785 Expiration Date: 10/31/2020 Expiration Date: 10/31/2020 MICS 52752 MICS 60851 1 For 2 Education Foundation 1 Michigan for the Global Majority 4337 E. Grand River, Ste. 198 1920 Scotten St. Howell MI 48843 Detroit MI 48209 Phone: (425)299-4484 Phone: (313)338-9397 Expiration Date: 07/31/2020 Expiration Date: 07/31/2020 MICS 46501 MICS 60769 1 Voice Can Help 10 Thousand Windows, Inc. 3290 Palm Aire Drive 348 N Canyons Pkwy Rochester Hills MI 48309 Livermore CA 94551 Phone: (248)703-3088 Phone: (571)263-2035 Expiration Date: 07/31/2021 Expiration Date: 03/31/2020 MICS 56240 MICS 10978 10/40 Connections, Inc. 100 Black Men of Greater Detroit, Inc 2120 Northgate Park Lane Suite 400 Attn: Donald Ferguson Chattanooga TN 37415 1432 Oakmont Ct. Phone: (423)468-4871 Lake Orion MI 48362 Expiration Date: 07/31/2020 Phone: (313)874-4811 Expiration Date: 07/31/2020 MICS 25388 MICS 43928 100 Club of Saginaw County 100 Women Strong, Inc. 5195 Hampton Place 2807 S. State Street Saginaw MI 48604 Saint Joseph MI 49085 Phone: (989)790-3900 Phone: (888)982-1400 Expiration Date: 07/31/2020 Expiration Date: 07/31/2020 MICS 58897 MICS 60079 1888 Message Study Committee, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal People News
    European Commission votes to ban dog &cat fur B R U S S E L S ––The European Commis- sion on November 20 adopted a proposal to ban the import, export, and sale of cat and dog fur throughout the European Union. “The draft regulation will now be considered by the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers for adoption by the co- decision procedure,” explained the EC Asian dog. (Kim Bartlett) announcement. “There is evidence that cat and dog fur been found not just on clothing, but also on a is being placed on the European market, usually number of personal accessories, as well as chil- dren’s soft toys.” Asian rabbits. (Kim Bartlett) undeclared as such or disguised as synthetic and other types of fur,” the EC announcement sum- “Just the idea of young children playing marized. “The vast majority of the cat and dog with toys which have been made with dog and Olympics to showcase growing fur is believed to be imported from third coun- cat fur is really something we cannot accept,” tries, notably China.” European Consumer Protection Commissioner Fifteen of the 25 EU member nations Markos Kyprianou said. Chinese animal testing industry have already individually introduced legislation “Kyprianou stopped short of calling B E I J I N G ––The 2008 Olympic Glenn Rice, chief executive of Bridge against cat and dog fur. “The proposed regula- for every product containing fur to have a label Games in Beijing will showcase the fast- Pharmaceuticals Inc., is outsourcing the tion adopted today addresses EU citizens con- detailing its exact origin,” wrote London Times growing Chinese animal testing industry, work to China, where scientists are cheap cerns, and creates a harmonized approach,” the European correspondent David Charter, the official Xinhua news agency disclosed and plentiful and animal-rights activists are EC announcement stipulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Results of Charitable Solicitation Campaigns Conducted by Commercial Fundraisers in Calendar Year 2016
    SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF CHARITABLE SOLICITATION CAMPAIGNS CONDUCTED BY COMMERCIAL FUNDRAISERS IN CALENDAR YEAR 2016 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General State of California SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF CHARITABLE SOLICITATION BY COMMERCIAL FUNDRAISERS FOR YEAR ENDING 2016 (Government Code § 12599) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES SUMMARY 1 - 5 TABLE SUBJECT/TITLE 1 ALPHABETICAL LISTING BY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION 2 LISTING BY PERCENT TO CHARITY IN DESCENDING ORDER 3 THRIFT STORE OPERATIONS – GOODS PURCHASED FROM CHARITY 4 THRIFT STORE OPERATIONS – MANAGEMENT FEE/COMMISSION 5 VEHICLE DONATIONS – ALPHABETICAL BY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION 6 COMMERCIAL COVENTURERS – ALPHABETICAL BY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION California Department of Justice November 2017 SUMMARY Every year Californians provide generous support to a wide array of charities, either directly or through commercial fundraisers that charities hire to solicit donations on their behalf. The term “commercial fundraiser” refers generally to a person or corporation that contracts with a charity, for compensation, to solicit funds. The commercial fundraiser charges either a flat fee or a percentage of the donations collected. By law, commercial fundraisers are required to register with the Attorney General’s Registry of Charitable Trusts and file a Notice of Intent before soliciting donations in California. For each solicitation campaign conducted, commercial fundraisers are then required to file annual financial disclosure reports that set forth total revenue and expenses incurred. This Summary Report is prepared from self-reported information contained in the annual financial disclosure reports filed by commercial fundraisers for 2016 and includes statistics for donations of both cash and used personal property (such as clothing and vehicles) for the benefit of charity. Only information from complete financial reports received before October 20, 2017 is included.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greyhound Protection Act More Than 100 Nonprofit Organizations
    The Greyhound Protection Act More than 100 nonprofit organizations and community leaders support the Greyhound Protection Act, which phases out commercial greyhound racing and additionally bans the use of live-animal lures used in training dogs in this industry. Key Endorsements Animal Wellness Action Eastwood Ranch Rescue Federation of Humane Organizations of West Virginia GREY2K USA Education Fund GREY2K USA Worldwide National Greyhound Adoption Program Stop Predatory Gambling The Center for a Humane Economy Local Animal Shelters Alaska SPCA (Alaska) Stone County Humane Society (Arkansas) Humane Society of Ventura County (California) spcaLA (California) Dumb Friends League (Colorado) The Animal Haven, Inc. (Connecticut) Alaqua Animal Refuge (Florida) Flagler Humane Society (Florida) Gulf Coast Humane Society (Florida) Humane Society of Manatee County (Florida) Humane Society Naples (Florida) Humane Society of Tampa Bay (Florida) Humane Society of the Treasure Coast (Florida) Jacksonville Humane Society (Florida) Peggy Adams Animal Rescue League (Florida) Southeast Volusia Humane Society (Florida) Your Humane Society SPCA (Florida) Atlanta Humane Society (Georgia) Kaua'i Humane Society (Hawaii) Hinsdale Humane Society (Illinois) Naperville Area Humane Society (Illinois) West Suburban Humane Society (Illinois) Bartholomew County Humane Society (Indiana) Animal Rescue League of Iowa (Iowa) Great Plains SPCA (Kansas) Kingman County Humane Society (Kansas) Leavenworth County Humane Society, Inc. (Kansas) PAWS Animal Adoption Center (Maine) The Heart of the Earth Sanctuary and Rescue (Maryland) Animal Rescue League of Boston (Massachusetts) Baypath Humane Society of Hopkinton (Massachusetts) Cape Ann Animal Aid (Massachusetts) A Helping Paw Humane Society (Massachusetts) Medfield Animal Shelter (Massachusetts) MSPCA-Angell (Massachusetts) Michigan Humane (Michigan) Blue Earth Nicollet County Humane Society (Minnesota) Minnesota Humane Society (Minnesota) Oktibbeha County Humane Society (Mississippi) Center for Animal Rescue and Enrichment of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Animal Equality 2015
    Additional information - for Animal Charity Evaluators - Assessment of Animal Equality 2015 Due date: October 7th 2015 1 1. What are your goals? Your vision? Your mission? (Update after strategic lines 2015) Vision Animal Equality works to create a world without animal suffering. Mission Animal Equality is a voice for farmed animals all over the world inspiring society and companies to adopt compassionate choices. 2. What are our objectives of the year? Goals in 3 or 5 years? Strategy Plan 2016 ­ 2020: Animal Equality has just finished its strategic plan for 2016­2020 and is working with an external company to have it summarized and transformed into a more visual document. As part of the strategic plan the organization has done a thorough internal and external analysis. Internal analysis: compilation of the financial, relations, material goods, management, function, procedures, dynamics of the organization in 8 countries. It has given insight to some of the internal problems that must be addressed as part of the strategy plan. As part of the external analysis we have analysed the education, legislation and companies in the 8 countries we are working in. This adds on to our STEP and SWOT analysis carried out sometime ago,as well as to the meat study being carried out in Germany to give AE an idea of what will be the areas of focus of the organization in the next years taking into account the organization's reality and resources. The organization’s country and international directors then had a 3 day meeting to discuss the organization's reality, identity and focus in the upcoming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Fall 2003 Volume 52 Number 4 About the Cover
    AWI Quarterly Fall 2003 Volume 52 Number 4 ABOUT THE COVER Buck is one of more than 100 dogs seized from the premises of random source animal dealer C.C. Baird. Buck, emaciated and suffering from heartworms and ehrlichia, was taken in by the Doberman Rescue Group of Oklahoma. After receiving much-needed medical attention and time to recuperate, Buck and another hound, Max, will be available for adoption. All of the animals seized, who have no doubt been through a nightmarish situation, will eventually be placed in new, loving homes. The case against Baird is ongoing, and indictments have not been issued yet. We hope that 1) USDA will revoke Baird’s license to do business as a dealer selling animals for experimentation, 2) the U.S. government will WILDLIFE gain custody of the more than 600 dogs that reportedly remain at Baird’s Martin Endangered Species for Sale...2 Creek Kennel in Williford, Arkansas, and 3) the U.S. Department of Justice will When Ethics Fail You, Just Make Threats…4 AWI vigorously pursue a case against Baird, prosecuting him for his crimes against the Quarterly animals to the fullest extent allowed by law (see story pages 10-11). USDA Ignores Ringling Bros.’ Elephant Abuse...5 Fall 2003 Volume 52 Number 4 FREE TRADE FOUNDER Christine Stevens Endangered Species for Sale AWI at the WTO Dolphins Swim Down the Streets of Cancun…6-7 DIRECTORS Marjorie Cooke Roger Fouts, Ph.D. our government wants to facilitate trophy hunters importing markhor from Jen Rinick/AWI NEWS FroM CAPItoL HILL John Gleiber Pakistan and wood bison from Canada, leather manufacturers importing Fredrick Hutchison, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrenn Colostate 0053A 13455.Pdf
    DISSERTATION PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION Submitted by Corey Lee Wrenn Department of Sociology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Michael Carolan Lynn Hempel Michael Lacy Marcela Velasco Copyright by Corey Lee Wrenn 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION This project explores the intra-movement interactions between professionalized and radical factions in the social movement arena using a content analysis of movement literature produced by the Nonhuman Animal rights movement between 1980 and 2013. Professionalized factions with greater symbolic capital are positioned to monopolize claimsmaking, disempower competing factions, and replicate their privilege and legitimacy. Radical factions, argued to be important variables in a movement’s health, are thus marginalized, potentially to the detriment of movement success and the constituency for whom they advocate. Specifically, this study explores the role of professionalization in manipulating the tactics and goals of social movement organizations and how the impacts of professionalization may be aggravating factional boundaries. Boundary maintenance may prevent critical discourse within the movement, and it may also provoke the “mining” of radical claimsmaking for symbols that have begun to resonate within the movement and the public. Analysis demonstrates a number of important consequences to professionalization that appear to influence the direction of factional disputes, and ultimately, the shape of the movement. Results indicate some degree of factional fluidity, but professionalization does appear to be a dominant force on movement trajectories by concentrating power in the social change space.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Animals: 2001 More Than a Slap on the Wrist
    Overview: The State of Animals in 2001 Paul G. Irwin he blizzard of commentary tors have taken part in a fascinating, environments; and change their inter- marking the turn of the millen- sometimes frustrating, dialogue that actions with other animals, evolving Tnium is slowly coming to an end. seeks to balance the needs of the nat- from exploitation and harm to Assessments of the past century (and, ural world with those of the world’s respect and compassion. more ambitiously, the past millenni- most dominant species—and in the Based upon that mission, The HSUS um) have ranged from the self-con- process create a truly humane society. almost fifty years after its founding gratulatory to the condemnatory. The strains created by unrestrained in 1954, “has sought to respond cre- Written from political, technological, development and accelerating harm atively and realistically to new chal- cultural, environmental, and other to the natural world make it impera- lenges and opportunities to protect perspectives, some of these commen- tive that the new century’s under- animals” (HSUS 1991), primarily taries have provided the public with standing of the word “humane” incor- through legislative, investigative, and thoughtful, uplifting analyses. At porate the insight that our human educational means. least one commentary has concluded fate is linked inextricably to that of It is only coincidentally that the that a major issue facing the United all nonhuman animals and that we choice has been made to view the States and the world is the place and all have a duty to promote active, animal condition through thoughtful plight of animals in the twenty-first steady, thorough notions of justice analysis of the past half century—the century, positing that the last few and fair treatment to animals and life span of The HSUS—rather than of decades of the twentieth century saw nonhuman nature.
    [Show full text]
  • 8/4/39 Agricultural, Consumer & Environmental Sciences Consumer
    The materials listed in this document are available for research at the University of Record Series Number Illinois Archives. For more information, email [email protected] or search http://www.library.illinois.edu/archives/archon for the record series number. 8/4/39 Agricultural, Consumer & Environmental Sciences Consumer Sciences & Agricultural Economics Department Harold Guither Papers, 1977-2001 Box 1: ANIMAL RIGHTS/WELFARE ORGANIZATIONS FILES–Includes promotional literature, publications, reports, mailings, etc., of these groups. Action for Animals, 1994 Alliance for Animals, The, 1990 American Anti-Vivisection Society, 1990 American Dietetic Association, 1988-93 American Farm Bureau Federation, 1988-94 (2 folders) American Fund for Alternatives to Animal Research, 1990 American Humane Association, The, 1990 American Kennel Club, 1994 American Medical Association, 1987-92 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, The, 1988-96 (2 folders) American Veal Association, 1993 American Vegan Society, The, 1991 Animal Industry Foundation, 1981-99 Animal Legal Defense Fund, 1993 Animal Liberation Front, 1986-98 Animal Protection Institute of America, 1982 Animal Rights Coalition, 1990 Animal Rights Information and Education Service, Inc., 1991, 1993 Animal Rights International, 1988 Animal Rights Mobilization, 1981-92 Animal Rights Network, 1985, 1997 1994 The Animals' Agenda, January/February 1991-October 1996 Animal Welfare Institute, 1990-93 Animals' Voice, The, 1990 Anti-Cruelty Society, 1990 Ark Trust, Inc., The Australian
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Hunting Groups, Arguments and Tactics, July 2019
    Anti-Hunting Groups, Arguments and Tactics July 3, 2019 Authors Micah Peel Rob Shaul Anti-Hunting Groups, Arguments and Tactics Background: Hunting is declining as an outdoors activity in the United States, and overall the number of self-reported hunters is small part of the population. Hunter numbers in the United States dropped 15% from 2011 to 2016, according to a 2016 US Fish & Wildlife Service Report. In 2016, the report found 11.5 million hunters in the United States, of which 9.2 million are big game hunters. Big Game hunters are just 2.8% over the overall US Census estimated 2016 population of 323 million. Despite declining hunter numbers, and small percentage of the overall population which hunts, a 2017 Study found that strong majority of US Residents, 87%, agreed that it was acceptable to hunt for food. However, only 37% agreed that it was acceptable to hunt for a trophy. Recent successful predator anti-hunting campaigns, and widespread national condemnation of hunters who have killed trophy or exotic animals demonstrate that anti-hunting sentiment in the United States is increasing. As well, there was a 600% increase in people identifying as vegans in the U.S between 2014 and 2017. According to a report by research firm GlobalData, only 1% of U.S.consumers claimed to be vegan in 2014. And in 2017, that number rose to 6% - twice the number of big game hunters in the country. Vegans believe it’s unethical to eat animals, and opposed hunting for food. This study attempts to identify the most prominent and successful anti-hunting arguments, tactics and groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal-Industrial Complex‟ – a Concept & Method for Critical Animal Studies? Richard Twine
    ISSN: 1948-352X Volume 10 Issue 1 2012 Journal for Critical Animal Studies ISSN: 1948-352X Volume 10 Issue 1 2012 EDITORAL BOARD Dr. Richard J White Chief Editor [email protected] Dr. Nicole Pallotta Associate Editor [email protected] Dr. Lindgren Johnson Associate Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Laura Shields Associate Editor [email protected] Dr. Susan Thomas Associate Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Richard Twine Book Review Editor [email protected] Vasile Stanescu Book Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Carol Glasser Film Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Adam Weitzenfeld Film Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Matthew Cole Web Manager [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD For a complete list of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board please see the Journal for Critical Animal Studies website: http://journal.hamline.edu/index.php/jcas/index 1 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 10, Issue 1, 2012 (ISSN1948-352X) JCAS Volume 10, Issue 1, 2012 EDITORAL BOARD ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LCA to Hold 33Rd Annual Fur-Free Friday
    Source: Last Chance for Animals November 15, 2019 16:31 ET Last Chance for Animals To Hold 33rd Annual Fur-Free Friday Protest In Beverly Hills LOS ANGELES, Nov. 15, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Last Chance for Animals (LCA) and a coalition of animal rights organizations—including Animal Defenders International, Chino Cow Save, CompassionWorks International, Direct Action Everywhere, In Defense of Animals, Los Angeles Animal Save, Orange County Animal Liberation, and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)—will be joined by actress Donna D’Errico and countless supporters to protest the sale of fur products along Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills as part of the annual Fur-Free Friday observance on November 29, 2019. Each year, millions of fur-bearing animals are raised in horrific conditions on farms only to be brutally killed for the sake of fashion. In October 2019, Governor Newsom signed AB 44 into law to outlaw the sale and manufacture of new fur products statewide, making California the first state in the nation to enact such a ban. The new law, which is a monumental victory for fur-bearing animals, goes into effect in January 2023. This year, the Fur-Free Friday demonstration—held on one of the busiest shopping days of the year— aims to urge retailers still selling fur to commit to going fur-free immediately, and not just in California but worldwide. Protesters will also educate consumers about the inherent cruelty of the fur industry and the impact they can create by supporting cruelty-free brands. WHEN: Friday, November 29, 2019 from 11:00 am to 1:00 pm PST WHERE: Demonstrators will gather at Beverly Gardens Park at the northwest corner of N.
    [Show full text]