MONTENEGRO on Its European Path #Euenlargement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

MONTENEGRO on its European path #EUenlargement ©Balsa Rakocevic Trade & Mobility & 09/2021 investment empowerment Key milestones ● The EU is Montenegro’s biggest trading ● Visa-free travel to the EU partner since December 2009 ● The EU’s Foreign Direct Investment in ● Over 4,153 participants from Montenegro Last updated: DECEMBER 2008 Montenegro reached €87.5 million in in student, academic and youth exchanges 2020 under ERASMUS+ (2014-2020) Application for EU ● Volume of trade in goods In 2020 ● Reforms of the social welfare and child- Membership with the EU was €1.1 care systems implemented with EU billion in 2020 38% support in exports ● €14.4 million in support to civil society MAY 2010 44% (2014-2020) in imports Entry into force of the Stabilisation and Supporting Association Agreement EU funding transformation ● The EU is the largest provider ● Strengthening democracy: rule of law, DECEMBER 2010 of financial assistance to Montenegro justice and fundamental rights ● €504.9 million in EU pre-accession funds ● Reforming public administration EU candidate country 2007-2020 status granted ● Fostering competitiveness and supporting ● €804 million provided in European business development Investment Bank loans since 1999 ● Working towards a cleaner environment ● €194.9 million provided since 2009 in and safer food supply JUNE 2012 Western Balkans Investment Framework EU decides to open grants, to leverage investments of Support accession negotiations estimated €1.8 billion 14% for key 22% sectors JUNE 2020 After eight years of accession negotiations all the 33 screened Democracy and Competitiveness, €269.2 millon chapters have been governance innovation, 2014 - 2020 opened, of which 3 are agriculture and rural Rule of law and development provisionally closed fundamental rights 16% Education, 36% Environment, climate employment and action and energy social policies Transport 7% 5% COVID-19 response In December 2020, the Commission adopted a €70 million package of grants to help fund the access of Western Balkans partners to COVID-19 vaccines. A part of these grants covered the delivery of almost 650,000 doses of BioNTech/ Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines to all the Western Balkans - funded by the EU and facilitated by Austria – between May and August 2021. In February 2021, the Commission launched a project of over €7 million jointly with WHO, to support readiness for vaccination efforts and resilient health systems in the Western Balkans. Source: EU Data ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement | facebook.com/EUnear | twitter.com/eu_near .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Montenegro's Tribal Legacy
WARNING! The views expressed in FMSO publications and reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Montenegro's Tribal Legacy by Major Steven C. Calhoun, US Army Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS. This article appeared in Military Review July-August 2000 The mentality of our people is still very patriarchal. Here the knife, revenge and a tribal (plemenski) system exist as nowhere else.1 The whole country is interconnected and almost everyone knows everyone else. Montenegro is nothing but a large family—all of this augurs nothing good. —Mihajlo Dedejic2 When the military receives an order to deploy into a particular area, planners focus on the terrain so the military can use the ground to its advantage. Montenegro provides an abundance of terrain to study, and it is apparent from the rugged karst topography how this tiny republic received its moniker—the Black Mountain. The territory of Montenegro borders Croatia, Bosnia- Herzegovina, Serbia and Albania and is about the size of Connecticut. Together with the much larger republic of Serbia, Montenegro makes up the current Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). But the jagged terrain of Montenegro is only part of the military equation. Montenegro has a complex, multilayered society in which tribe and clan can still influence attitudes and loyalties. Misunderstanding tribal dynamics can lead a mission to failure. Russian misunderstanding of tribal and clan influence led to unsuccessful interventions in Afghanistan and Chechnya.3 In Afghanistan, the rural population's tribal organization facilitated their initial resistance to the Soviets.
[Show full text]
10 Years After Bucharest Why NATO Should Double-Down on Georgian
C - 0; M - 95; Y - 100; K - 2; PANTONE 485 CP C - 0; M - 98; Y - 91; K - 30; PANTONE 7621 CP C - 0; M - 97; Y - 87; K - 60; PANTONE 7624 CP POLICY BRIEF EUROPE IN THE WORLD PROGRAMME 3 JULY 2018 10 years after Bucharest Why NATO should Amanda Paul Senior Policy Analyst, EPC double-down on Ana Andguladze Georgian membership Policy Researcher, ISPED 2018 is a momentous year for Georgia: it marks the interest to strengthen ties with Tbilisi. As a reliable 100th anniversary of the first Democratic Republic of partner that shares common interests and values, the Georgia. It is also the 10th anniversary of the war with country offers the West a strategic foothold in the South Russia (August 2008) and of the Bucharest Summit, Caucasus. The Alliance must reaffirm its membership when Tbilisi was promised a seat at NATO’s table. commitment and reiterate that no third country has a veto on its enlargement. It should further deepen A decade on, NATO-Georgia cooperation has practical cooperation and bolster Georgia’s ability substantially deepened. The country now meets to defend itself. Reaffirming NATO’s support would NATO standards in many areas: it has modernised its reassure Georgian society, boost reform efforts and move armed forces and interoperability between Georgian the country ever closer to the Alliance. troops and the armies of NATO countries has increased. Georgia has contributed more to international NATO missions than many existing members and also meets the Alliance’s defence spending target. Tbilisi has also undertaken reforms to strengthen democracy, eradicate Georgia has contributed more to corruption and ensure civilian control of the military.
[Show full text]
Deloitte Legal Perspectives: International Dismissal Survey
Deloitte Legal Perspectives International Dismissal Survey February 2018 Brochure / report title goes here | Section title goes here Contents Introduction 5 Cost projection 6 Main conclusions 13 Dismissal Calculator 20 Country reports 25 This is a survey conducted in December 2017 and consequently reflects the legislation of the different countries at that particular time. The figures used in the cost projection date from December 2017 and therefore do not take into account any changes in legislation of a later date. Although this survey has been performed with the greatest care, the material in this guide is only for information purposes on general practices. The authors may not be held responsible in any way for any possible error that might occur or for any use or interpretation that could be made of this information. It is not intended to be used as advice in any event. 3 International Dismissal Survey Countries across all Introduction regions (America, This 4th edition of the International Dismissal Survey is more than a refresh. Firstly, the number of participating countries has increased by 15. In addition to more European countries (Cyprus, Servia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, etc.), the survey for the first Europe and APAC) time also includes countries from Latin America (e.g. Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador) and the Asia- Pacific region (e.g. China, Singapore, Japan etc.). In total, this survey comprises the legislation of 46 countries: share many similar Austria, Albania, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Montenegro, Myanmar, employment termination Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Singapore, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Vietnam.
[Show full text]
CROATIA, MONTENEGRO and SERBIA Early Childhood
CROATIA, MONTENEGRO AND SERBIA Early childhood education for children with disabilities; system strengthening and innovation; – Harnessing technology to promote communication, education and social inclusion for young children with developmental delays and disabilities in Croatia, Montenegro, and Serbia. Every child has the right to learn – In the case of Croatia, Montenegro and Serbia, affordable Assistive Technology for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) is being introduced to support young children with complex communication needs who may otherwise may be left out of early childhood education services. This innovation promotes interaction and helps vulnerable children to develop language, steering them towards an education and active social life right from the early years. Problem Initiative Many young children with communication-related In Croatia, Montenegro, and Serbia, preschool teachers, speech and disabilities are not identified or referred for necessary language therapists, psychologists, and special educators are being attention in a timely fashion, resulting in their exclusion trained to identify and support young children with speech, language, from critical early learning opportunities. This is due to a and communication-related difficulties who could benefit from assistive lack of: 1) capacity among professionals to identify technology. An open license AAC tablet-based communicator – developmental delays early on; 2) familiarity with using Cboard, which has been customized for languages in the pilot assistive technology with young children; and 3) access countries – is being tested for effectiveness. UNICEF’s Innovation to affordable and appropriate assistive technological Fund supported the development of Cboard to improve the availability solutions that can be operated in local languages. of affordable AAC solutions that can be scaled up sustainably.
[Show full text]
The Covid-19 Crisis in Montenegro
THE COVID-19 CRISIS IN MONTENEGRO 31 January 2021 COVID-19 health situation – December 2020/January 2021 • After having successfully achieved zero cases at the end of May, Montenegro began experiencing a second wave of infections throughout the summer and autumn, reaching new peak levels in November. The number of daily new cases decreased and stabilised in December and January, however, 10 048 total cases per 100 000 inhabitants, Montenegro continues to record one of the highest number of cases in Europe. On 28 January, the total number of cases reached 60 288, with 790 deaths since the outbreak. Evolution of active cases in Montenegro Source: Worldometers.info • Wearing protective masks indoors and outdoors remains mandatory, including for children older than five years. Strict controls will continue to check whether people wear masks, while private business owners are in charge of assuring that on-site customers respect sanitary measures. Policy reactions – December 2020/January 2021 Measures to slow the spread of the virus and support the health system • Mobility and event restrictions: The National Coordination Body introduced uniform economy-wide measures on 14 November, which will remain in place until at least 10 February. A countrywide curfew THE COVID-19 CRISIS IN MONTENEGRO © OECD 2021 | 2 remains in place until at least 10 February, whereby leaving the place of residence is prohibited from 22:00 to 5:00. Walking in groups larger than four remains prohibited and only registered cultural events of up to 25 people and lasting no longer than 60 minutes are allowed. Religious and private gatherings are forbidden, while religious ceremonies can be performed without visitors.
[Show full text]
Montenegro Guidebook
MONTENEGRO PREFACE Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro, lies in a broad plain crossed by five rivers and surrounded by mountains, just 20 kilometers from the Albanian border. The city has a population of around 180,000 people. Bombed into rubble during World War II, Podgorica was rebuilt into a modern urban center, with high-rise apartment buildings and new office and shopping developments. While the latest Balkan war had a low impact on the physical structures, the economic sanctions had a devastating effect on employment and infrastructure. With the help of foreign investment, urban renewal is evident throughout the city, but much of it may still appear run down. Podgorica has a European-style town center with a pedestrian- only walking street (mall) and an assortment of restaurants, cafes, and boutiques. To many, its principal attraction is as a base for the exploration of Montenegro’s natural beauty, with mountains and wild countryside all around and the stunning Adriatic coastline less than an hour away. This is a mountainous region with barren moorlands and virgin forests, with fast-flowing rivers and picturesque lakes; Skadar Lake in particular is of ecological significance. The coastline is known for its sandy beaches and dramatic coves: for example, Kotor – the city that is protected by UNESCO and the wonderful Cathedral of Saint Typhoon; the unique baroque Perast; Saint George and Our Lady of the Rock islands – all locations that tell a story of a lasting civilization and the wealth of the most wonderful bay in the world. The area around the city of Kotor is a UNESCO World Heritage site for its natural beauty and historic significance.
[Show full text]
Montenegro Media Sector Inquiry with Recommendations for Harmonisation with the Council of Europe and European Union Standards
Montenegro Media Sector Inquiry with Recommendations for Harmonisation with the Council of Europe and European Union standards Report by Tanja Kerševan Smokvina (ed.) Jean-François Furnémont Marc Janssen Dunja Mijatović Jelena Surčulija Milojević Snežana Trpevska 29 December 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................5 PROJECT BACKGROUND 5 FINDINGS AND PROPOSALS 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 13 PURPOSE 13 SCOPE 13 ORGANISATION 14 STRUCTURE 14 METHODOLOGY 16 CH. I: MARKET OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT ................................................................................... 17 CONTEXT AND ENVIRONMENT 17 ACCESS AND OFFER 18 ECONOMIC HEALTH AND DYNAMICS 20 LEGAL AND REGULATORY INTERVENTIONS 22 IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC 23 POLICY BRIEF 24 CH. II: LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................. 26 HARMONISATION: A STEP FORWARD, TWO BACK 26 LEGISLATION: OVERVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS 26 INSTITUTIONS: GAPS, OVERLAPS AND CAPTURE 35 THE NATIONAL REGULATORY AUTHORITY 40 POLICY BRIEF 42 CH. III: PUBLIC SERVICE MEDIA ......................................................................................................... 44 PUBLICLY FUNDED MEDIA IN MONTENEGRO 44 ORGANISATION AND GOVERNANCE 44 FUNDING 46 AUTONOMY AND INDEPENDENCE 47 CONTENT: UNIVERSALITY AND
[Show full text]
WESTERN BALKANS REGULAR ECONOMIC REPORT No.19 | Spring 2021
WESTERN BALKANS REGULAR ECONOMIC REPORT No.19 | Spring 2021 Public Disclosure Authorized Subdued Recovery Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Western Balkans Regular Economic Report No.19 Subdued Recovery Spring 2021 Acknowledgements This Regular Economic Report (RER) covers economic developments, prospects, and economic policies in the Western Balkans’ region: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia. The report is produced twice a year by a team led by Edith Kikoni and Enrique Blanco Armas (Task Team Leaders). This issue’s core team included World Bank staff working on the Western Balkan countries (with additional contributions to specific sections): Christoph Ungerer, Nicolo Dalvit (Growth section), Sanja Madžarević-Šujster, Filip Jolevski (Labor section), Trang Nguyen, Ana Maria Oviedo, Leonardo Lucchetti (Poverty section), Milan Lakićević, Besart Myderrizi (Fiscal section), Hilda Shijaku (Monetary section), Johanna Jaeger (Financial sector section), Sandra Hlivnjak (External section), Lazar Šestović (Outlook section) and Tania Ghossein, Sylvia Solf and Ahmed Nauraiz Rana (Spotlight). Additional contributions were made by: Stefanie Koettl- Brodmann (Spotlight); Collette Wheeler (Outlook Section); Carlos Gustavo Ospino Hernandez (Poverty section); Alena Kantarovich, Alper Oguz, Gunhild Berg, Keler Gjika and Qianye Zhang (Financial sector section) and Marc Schiffbauer and Asli Senkal. Research assistance was provided by Suzana Jukić. Anne Grant provided assistance in editing, and Budy Wirasmo assistance in designing. The cover image was created by Sanja Tanić. The dissemination of the report and external and media relations are managed by an External Communications team comprised of John Mackedon, Artem Kolesnikov, Paul A. Clare, Lundrim Aliu, Anita Božinovska, Ana Gjokutaj, Jasmina Hadžić, Gordana Filipovic, Mirjana Popović, Sanja Tanić and Carl P.
[Show full text]
Serbia (Srbija), Montenegro (Crna Gora) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosna I Hercegovina)
Serbia (Srbija), Montenegro (Crna Gora) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosna i Hercegovina) Recent history Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH) were all (along with Croatia and FYR Macedonia) formed as a result of the break-up of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. BIH declared its independence from Yugoslavia in 1992, following a referendum. This break-up sparked conflict among the three large ethnic groups within the federation. Bosniaks and Croats generally favoured independence, whereas Bosnian Serbs, supported by the Serbian government, wished for a union with Serbia. Further conflict later erupted between the Croat statelet of Herzog-Bosnia and the Bosniaks. The wars lasted until the intervention of NATO and the signing of the Dayton Accords in 1995, by which time an estimated 100,000 people had been killed, many in acts of ethnic cleansing. Under the Dayton Accords, BIH was administratively decentralised and divided into two entities, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska. Central government is consociational, with three rotating Presidents and set numbers of seats in both Houses of the Parliamentary Assembly for Croats, Bosniaks and Serbs. After the dissolution of Yugoslavia,How Serbia does did maintaina General a federation Election with Montenegro. actually However, work? this gradually evolved into a looser relationship, and Montenegrins narrowly voted for independence from Serbia in May 2006. Montenegro The UK is a liberal democracy. This means that we democratically elect politicians, who is now recognised as a separate nation by both Serbia and the EU. represent our interests. It also involves that individual rights are protected. Much more problematic has been Serbia’s relationship with Kosovo, which has a majority (90%) ethnic Albanian population.
[Show full text]
Serbia and Montenegro
Serbia and Montenegro Main objectives Serbia and Montenegro • Provide legal assistance and encourage Serbia and Montenegro (SCG) to adopt a law on refugees, and create a national asylum system, including fair and efﬁ cient Refugee Status Determination (RSD) procedures; • Phase out assistance to post-Dayton refugees by ensuring their inclusion in bilateral and government- sponsored development programmes, with continued assistance only for the most vulnerable; and • Facilitate the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) to Kosovo where possible and continue to as- sist the most vulnerable in their situation of displace- ment. Kosovo • Contribute towards the creation of conditions which will prevent further displacement of minorities in Kosovo; facilitate the voluntary return of minority IDPs and refu- gees to their places of origin and help to promote their subsequent long-term reintegration; • Identify and facilitate the attainment of durable solu- to refugees and IDPs. Furthermore, refugees and IDPs tions for refugees from Croatia and Bosnia and Her- are now included in the World Bank’s Poverty Reduction zegovina (BiH). Strategy Paper processes. A large number of collective centres have been closed and the residents assisted in ﬁ nding alternative housing. Working environment Recent developments Planning figures: Serbia and Montenegro Serbia and Montenegro Population Jan. 2004 Dec. 2004 The new State Union of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (refugees) 89,950 40,000 Montenegro (SCG) was established Croatia (refugees) 180,000 70,000 in February 2003. Upon accession IDPs 220,000 200,000 to the Council of Europe in April Mandate refugees and asylum-seekers 280 6,000 2003, SCG committed itself to the Other refugees 50 20 enactment of national legislation Returnee IDPs 2,000 2,000 compliant with international law Total 492,280 318,020 and standards, including refugee legislation, but, at the time of writing, Planning figures: Kosovo basic issues of institutional compe- Population Jan.
[Show full text]
Rules for Companies Operating in Denmark
Juni 2018 Rules for companies operating in Denmark Foreign companies and posted workers performing work in Denmark must be familiar with Danish labour market regulations and must comply with these rules. In this leaflet you can read more about working conditions in Denmark, RUT, health and safety requirements and tax rules. You can read more on WorkplaceDenmark.dk. 2 Rules and rights when working in Denmark Contents Register of Foreign Service Providers Register of Foreign Service Providers (RUT) 4 Working conditions in Denmark The right to organise 5 Wages and salaries 5 Working hours 6 Holiday rules 6 Prohibition against discrimination 9 Equal opportunities and equal pay 9 VAT and tax VAT and tax 10 Danish working environment rules The Danish Working Environment Authority 12 Requirements for health and safety collaboration 12 Alternating workplaces 13 Workplace risk assessments 13 Industrial injuries Working for longer periods in Denmark 15 List of insurance companies in Denmark 15 Reporting industrial injuries 16 Health and safety in the building and construction sector Advice for ensuring safe and healthy building sites 19 Handbook on health and safety in the building and construction sector 19 Rules and rights when working in Denmark 3 Register of Foreign Service Providers As a foreign employer temporarily pro- pany has been registered, you will viding services in Denmark, you must receive a receipt containing your RUT notify the Register of Foreign Service number. You will need to use this when Providers (RUT) electronically about you contact the Danish authorities. your company and services. This also applies to self-employed contractors If you perform work in building and without employees.
[Show full text]
Contact List - Hospitals – Serbia, Montenegro and North Macedonia
Contact List - Hospitals – Serbia, Montenegro and North Macedonia The names and contact details of medical services in Serbia, Montenegro and North Macedonia appearing below have been compiled by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) from publicly-available information. DFAT does not endorse any of the medical services appearing in this list, provides no guarantees as to its currency and does not accept any liability if you choose to engage one of these medical services. Name Address Contact Details Contact: Institute for Infectious and Bulevar Oslobodjenja 16, Belgrade B: (+381-11)268 33 66 Tropical Diseases Belgrade Serbia Contact: Novi Sad - Clinical Centre Hajduk Veljkova 1-9, Novi Sad 21000 B: (+381-21)484 3484 Novi Sad Serbia Contact: Pediatrics - Institute of Radoja Dakica 8, New Belgrade B: (+381-11) 3108 108 Mother and Child- (Dr Srdjan Pasic and Belgrade Dr Jovan Kosutic) Serbia Contact: Bel Medic - Private Clinic Krste Jovanovica 87, Belgrade B: (+381-11) 309 1000 Belgrade Serbia Contact: Belgrade - Emergency Centre Pasterova 2, 11000 Belgrade B: (+381-11) 361-8444, Belgrade Serbia Contact: Milos Klinika - Dr Zoran Radoslava Grujica 25 B: (+381-11) 2455 759 (8-20h) Kuljaca Belgrade Email: [email protected] Serbia Contact: Nis - Clinical Centre Zorana Djindjica 48, Nis 18000 B: (+381-18) 506-906 Nis Email: [email protected] Serbia Contact: Burns Centre Zvecanska 9, Belgrade B: (+381-11) 2647-766 Belgrade Serbia Contact: Anlave Clinic 1-Private Clinic Vase Pelagica 68, Belgrade B: (+381 11) 2 650 950, for emergency Belgrade 063 35 12 35 Serbia Contact: Dedinje Cardiovascular Narodnih Heroja Milana Tepica 1, B: (+381-11) 3601-700; 3601 714; 3601 Institute Belgrade 711 Serbia Email: [email protected] 1 Contact List - Hospitals – Serbia, Montenegro and North Macedonia The names and contact details of medical services in Serbia, Montenegro and North Macedonia appearing below have been compiled by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) from publicly-available information.
[Show full text]