DOCSLIB.ORG

Wilbur D. Mills Interview I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wilbur D. Mills Interview I LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON LIBRARY ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION The LBJ Library Oral History Collection is composed primarily of interviews conducted for the Library by the University of Texas Oral History Project and the LBJ Library Oral History Project. In addition, some interviews were done for the Library under the auspices of the National Archives and the White House during the Johnson administration. Some of the Library's many oral history transcripts are available on the INTERNET. Individuals whose interviews appear on the INTERNET may have other interviews available on paper at the LBJ Library. Transcripts of oral history interviews may be consulted at the Library or lending copies may be borrowed by writing to the Interlibrary Loan Archivist, LBJ Library, 2313 Red River Street, Austin, Texas, 78705. WILBUR MILLS ORAL HISTORY, INTERVIEW I PREFERRED CITATION For Internet Copy: Transcript, Wilbur Mills Oral History Interview I, 11/2/71, by Joe B. Frantz, Internet Copy, LBJ Library. For Electronic Copy on Diskette from the LBJ Library: Transcript, Bess Wilbur Mills History Interview I, 11/2/71, by Joe B. Frantz, Electronic Copy, LBJ Library. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON LIBRARY Legal Agreement Pertaining to the Oral History Interview of Wilbur Mills In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 21 of Title 44, United States Code and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, I, Wilbur Mills of Kensett, Arkansas do hereby give, donate and convey the United States of America all my rights, title, and interest in the tape recording and transcript of the personal interview conducted on November 2, 1971 in Washington, D.C. and prepared for deposit in the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library. This assignment is subject to the following terms and conditions: (1) The transcript shall be available for use by researchers as soon as it has been deposited in the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library. (2) The tape recording shall be available to those researchers who have access to the transcript. (3) I hereby assign to the United States Government all copyright I may have in the interview transcript and tape. (4) Copies of the transcript and the tape recording may be provided by the Library to researchers upon request. (5) Copies of the transcript and tape recording may be deposited in or loaned to institutions other than the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library. Signed by Wilbur Mills on November 13, 1978 Accepted by James E. O'Neill, Acting Archivist of the United States on December 6, 1978 Original Deed of Gift on File at the Lyndon B. Johnson Library, 2313 Red River, Austin, TX 78705 ACCESSION NUMBER 79-41 INTERVIEW I DATE: November 2, 1971 INTERVIEWEE: WILBUR MILLS INTERVIEWER: JOE B. FRANTZ PLACE: The Capitol in Washington Tape 1 of 1 F: Mr. Congressman, you came to Congress in 1938, or [were] elected in 1938, came in 1939, right? M: That's right, January 3. F: Did you know Lyndon Johnson previously to that? M: I did not, but I became acquainted with him almost immediately after I came to Congress. F: Because you were bordering states, or some other reason? M: That's right. F: How did you first meet him? M: My recollection is behind the rail on the House floor. F: Did you develop a fairly close relationship in that time? M: I thought we had a very close relationship, yes. F: I presume that Sam Rayburn sort of acted as, to use the expression, midwife in this in a way. M: We were thrown together an awful lot as a result of Sam Rayburn, yes. F: You have often been spoken of, in a sense, as one of Sam Rayburn's boys. M: I am always honored when anybody says that. Wilbur Mills -- Interview I -- 2 F: Did you get in on these Board of Education meetings that came along? M: Oh, yes. F: Did you have a feeling in those days that Lyndon Johnson was going to go beyond the House and try for something a little broader? M: I didn't get that impression of him. I didn't know enough about his ambitions, of course, but I thought he was ideally fitted for the legislative branch of government, and that when he was elected to the Senate and became majority leader that that was probably what he had as his top ambition. I was not intimately acquainted with his desires or with his ambitions. F: Did you work with him on any committees in the House? M: No, he was on the old Naval Affairs Committee in the House. I was on the Banking and Currency first and then the Ways and Means later. So we were not on the same committees. I worked with him not only in the House but to an even greater extent after he went to the United States Senate and became majority leader. F: Yes. Now then, when he became Senate majority leader your relations continued, in fact, if anything it seemed to deepen. Is that right? M: Oh, yes, we became much closer while he was in the Senate, really, than had been the case while we were in the House. F: Now, why is that? M: I don't know unless it was the fact that he occupied a more preeminent position in the Senate than he did in the House. He had no real seniority in the House by the time he ran for the Senate. He had been here a while, but he had not gone up to be chairman of the committee or anything. F: Meanwhile though you're climbing the seniority level. M: Yes. F: Did you work together on legislation? M: Oh yes, altogether. F: Did you find any sort of House-Senate conflict under his leadership? Wilbur Mills -- Interview I -- 3 M: No. The Senate, I think, under Lyndon Johnson operated far more cooperatively with the House than at any time since I have been here. F: That's before or since? M: Before or since. F: Were there feelings in the House among the House members that maybe he paid too much attention to the House, which is not his body? M: No, I don't think that could be said of him. He was very loyal to the House while he was here, but then after he became a senator his loyalty shifted to the Senate, He was intensely loyal to that body while a member of it. F: Were you active in the 1956 Democratic convention, the one that picked Adlai Stevenson for the second time and nominated Estes Kefauver? M: Yes, I was there. F: Do you have any light to throw on why Texas abandoned Kefauver and went for Kennedy? M: I was not really in on a lot of the caucusing that took place at that time. My own state went for Kennedy as well. F: Yes. M: I never really knew why the old pros of the Democratic Party did not like Estes Kefauver enough to want him to be nominated. Apparently they thought more of Kennedy than they did of Kefauver, because practically all of them that I knew anything about it at the convention were very definitely for Kennedy. F: This would have extended to Sam Rayburn, too? M: I don't know about that. I don't about that. He was presiding as the permanent chairman of the convention. I never did talk to him about it. I don't know what his views were. But I think very definitely the Senate Majority Leader at the time was on the Kennedy side. F: Did you ever have any opportunity in these Senate days of Lyndon Johnson to observe his relationship with J. William Fulbright? M: No, I thought they were pretty good friends in those days. I had occasion to visit with Wilbur Mills -- Interview I -- 4 both of them. I don't know that I ever heard Lyndon Johnson say anything about Bill Fulbright, but it is my recollection that Bill had a great deal of respect for him as majority leader. Whether they were close personally, I never knew. F: Was there a feeling that quite apart from being a Texas senator and a majority leader for the whole nation, that Johnson was a fairly good representative of a section? M: Oh, absolutely, he was probably the greatest senator Texas has had since I have been here, and so far as Texas interests are concerned that includes Senator [Tom] Connally and Senator [Morris] Sheppard, who were in the Senate when I first came. I don't mean to say they weren't great senators--they were. But I do know that Lyndon Johnson was very tenacious when it came to resolving problems and obtaining things for his native state. F: Did the passage of the civil rights act in the late 1950's reduce Johnson's influence among the southern delegations? M: I don't think so. I never detected it. F: Did they sort of accept it as something he had to do. M: He was very close to members of the Senate from the South when he became president. He was very close to them when he was running for the presidency in 1960. They were unable to deliver perhaps as much as he thought they would be able to deliver. F: Did you have any intimation of his making a try for the nomination in 1960? M: I think all of us knew sometime in early 1960 or late 1959 that he would make this try to get the Democratic nomination in 1960.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arkansas Department of Health 1913 – 2013
    Old State House, original site of the Arkansas Department of Health 100 years of service Arkansas Department of Health 1913 – 2013 100yearsCover4.indd 1 1/11/2013 8:15:48 AM 100 YEARS OF SERVICE Current Arkansas Department of Health Location Booklet Writing/Editing Team: Ed Barham, Katheryn Hargis, Jan Horton, Maria Jones, Vicky Jones, Kerry Krell, Ann Russell, Dianne Woodruff, and Amanda Worrell The team of Department writers who compiled 100 Years of Service wishes to thank the many past and present employees who generously provided information, materials, and insight. Cover Photo: Reprinted with permission from the Old State House Museum. The Old State House was the original site of the permanent Arkansas State Board of Health in 1913. Arkansas Department of Health i 100 YEARS OF SERVICE Table of Contents A MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR ................................................................................................. 1 PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 4 INFECTIOUS DISEASE .......................................................................................................................... 4 IMMUNIZATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
    [Show full text]
  • The House Committee on Ways and Means
    This dissertation has been 65-13,211 microfilmed exactly as received CATALDO, Everett Felix, 1935- THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1965 Political Science, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University Everett F. Cataldo, B.A., M.A. ****** The Ohio State University 1965 Approved by Adyz.ser u Department orPolitical Science VTTA October 5? 1935 Born - Franklin, Massachusetts 1957.......... B.A., College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts 1959.......... M.A., Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts I96O- 6 2....... Teaching Assistant, Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1 9 6 2 -6 3....... Congressional Fellow of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C. 1 9 6 3 -6 5....... Visiting Lecturer, Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Political Science American Government and Politics. Professors Harvey C. Mansfield and Myron Q. Hale Parties, Politics, and Political Processes. Professors Allen E. Helms, Lawrence J. R. Herson, and James B. Christoph Political Theory. Professor David Spitz Comparative Government. Professors Harold Zink and James B. Christoph TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES............ v INTRODUCTION....................................... 1 Chapter I. THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: STRUCTUAL PROPERTIES..................... 12 Committee Organization Recruitment of Committee Members Summary and Conclusion II. PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF WAYS AND MEANS MEMBERS................... 51 Summary and Conclusions III. GENESIS OF THE TAX PROGRAM................
    [Show full text]
  • Taxes, Politics and the History of Organizational Choice in the 1950'S
    Alabama Law Scholarly Commons Articles Faculty Scholarship 2008 When American Small Business Hot the Jackpot: Taxes, Politics and the History of Organizational Choice in the 1950's Mirit Eyal-Cohen University of Alabama - School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles Recommended Citation Mirit Eyal-Cohen, When American Small Business Hot the Jackpot: Taxes, Politics and the History of Organizational Choice in the 1950's, 6 Pitt. Tax Rev. 1 (2008). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles/110 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Alabama Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Alabama Law Scholarly Commons. ARTICLES WHEN AMERICAN SMALL BUSINESS HIT THE JACKPOT: TAXES, POLITICS AND THE HISTORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHOICE IN THE 1950s Mirit Eyal-Cohen* When I came to study the income tax problems of the small business man, I had a feeling I had looked at all the ills and diseases of the tax law. -Charles T. Akre, Nebraska Tax Institute, 19431 INTRODUCTION While many political developments affected American small businesses during the twentieth century, the enactment of Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) was of particular significance.2 Under Subchapter S, a small business corporation could elect to be treated as a partnership and have its shareholders taxed at the end of each year on their tax return in a pass- through manner.3 The elimination of double taxation for the small business * S.J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Affordable Care Act and Medicaid Expansion
    THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND MEDICAID EXPANSION: EXAMINING THE ARKANSAS PRIVATE OPTION AS AN ALTERNATIVE MEDICAID WAIVER DESIGN TO EXPAND HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR THE UNINSURED A thesis presented by Brian Dermot Coyne To Doctor of Law and Policy Program In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Law and Policy College of Professional Studies Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts May 2016 To my parents Dr. Dermot P. Coyne and Dr. Ann Coyne Who instilled in me a lifelong love of learning. That love continues. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to especially thank Dr. Neenah Estrella-Luna, who served as my thesis advisor, for her thoughtful guidance and encouraging support throughout this project. I would also like to thank Professor Kenneth Apfel, who served as my external reviewer, and who provided me with constructive comments and ongoing advice during the writing process. I want to thank Professor Dan Urman, James Passanisi, and all the faculty and staff in the Doctor of Law and Policy Program at Northeastern University for their work to make this program challenging and thought-provoking each and every day. Finally, I would like to thank my family, my wife, Maureen, and my son, Patrick, for their support of me during this journey. It has been a while since I was a student. They put up with my frustrations and shared in my successes. Their love and support was steadfast as I took on this new challenge. I can never thank them enough for allowing me the opportunity to seek the degree of Doctor of Law and Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Power and Rural Resistance in the Arkansas Ozarks
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2014 Dynamics of Defiance: Government Power and Rural Resistance in the Arkansas Ozarks J. Blake Perkins Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Perkins, J. Blake, "Dynamics of Defiance: Government Power and Rural Resistance in the Arkansas Ozarks" (2014). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 6404. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6404 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dynamics of Defiance: Government Power and Rural Resistance in the Arkansas Ozarks J. Blake Perkins Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Kenneth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D., Committee Chairperson Elizabeth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D. Joseph Hodge, Ph.D. James Siekmeier, Ph.D. Brooks Blevins, Ph.D. Department of History Morgantown, WV 2014 Keywords: Ozarks; Arkansas; rural; government; liberal state; populism; resistance; dissent; smallholder; agrarianism; industrialization; agribusiness; liberalism; conservatism; economic development; politics; stereotypes Copyright 2014 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Supreme Court Project Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society Interview with Ray Thornton Little Rock, Arkansas September 20, 2011
    This oral history with former Justice Ray Thornton was conducted in two parts, on September 20, 2011, by Scott Lunsford of the David and Barbara Pryor Center for Oral and Visual History at the University of Arkansas and on February 21, 2013, by Ernest Dumas. The second interview goes into more detail on some aspects of his political career, particularly the Supreme Court. The Dumas interview follows the end of the Lunsford interview. Arkansas Supreme Court Project Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society Interview with Ray Thornton Little Rock, Arkansas September 20, 2011 Interviewer: Scott Lunsford Scott Lunsford: Today’s date is September 20 and the year is 2011 and we’re in Little Rock at 1 Gay Place. I’m sorry, I don’t know the name of the person whose residence we are at, but we decided we wanted kind of a quiet, withdrawn place to do this interview and Julie Baldridge, your loyal helper… Ray Thornton: She and I have worked together for many years and she is really an extraordinary person. And on this day she has just been named the interim director of the Arkansas Scholarship Lottery Commission staff in Little Rock. SL: That’s a great honor. RT: Well, it is for her and she deserves it. SL: Well, we’re very grateful for her help in finding this place and getting us together. Let me say first that it is a great honor to be sitting across from you and I’ve looked forward to this for some time. Now, let me give you a brief description of what we’re doing here.
    [Show full text]
  • John L. Mcclellan Collection Container List Range R Through Range V (Political Oversize Items) Box 1 – Box 1079 File Numbers Are Inside Brackets [ ]
    John L. McClellan Collection Container List Range R through Range V (Political Oversize Items) Box 1 – Box 1079 File numbers are inside brackets [ ] Range: R: 1 Box 1 Dates: 1942 Arkansas Counties Correspondence: 1942 Arkansas County [1] Ashley County [2] Baxter County [3] Benton County [4] Bradley County [5] Boone County [6] Calhoun County [7] Carroll County [8] Chicot County [9] Clark County [10] Clay County [11] Clebourne County [12] Cleveland County [13] Columbia County [14] Conway County [15] Craighead County [16] Crawford County [17] Crittenden County [18] Cross County [19] Dallas County [20] Drew County [21] 1 Desha County [22] Faulkner County [23] Franklin County [24] Fulton County [25] Garland County [26] Grant County [27] Greene County [28] Hempstead County [29] Hot Spring County [F30] Howard County [31] Independence County [32] Izard County [33] Jackson County [34] Jefferson County [35] Johnson County [36] Lafayette County [37] Lawrence County [38] Lee County [39] Lincoln County [40] Little River County [41] Logan County [42] Lonoke County [43] Madison County [44] Marion County [45] Miller County [46] Mississippi County [47] Monroe County [48] Montgomery County [49] Nevada County [50] Ouachita County [51] Perry County [52] Phillips County [53] Pike County [54] 2 Poinsett County [55] Polk County [56] Pope County [57] Prairie County [58] Pulaski County [59A-59C] Randolph County [60] Saline County [-61] Scott County [62] MISSING Searcy County [63] Sevier County [-64] Sebastian County [65] Sharp County [66] St. Francis County [67]
    [Show full text]
  • Directories - Congressional Club (2)” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 34, folder “Directories - Congressional Club (2)” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Betty Ford donated to the United States of America her copyrights in all of her unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. ill:~e QI:ongressional Qtlub ~asqingtnn, c!0· OL 0 I> . <... !ear l8nok 1971-1973 <!r~e Qfongressfonal QUuh ~asqington, ~· OL !ear ~nok 1971-1973 ll I I THE PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE The wealth of service rendered by the wives of Washington officialdom has been a continuing source of inspiration to those charged with the responsibilities for "life, liberty and the pnrsuit of happiness" in our Nation's Capital. Since it was chartered by the Congress in 1908 as an educational, civic and social organization, the Congressional Club has channeled its richly diverse and talented membership into meaningful avenues of service. Throughout our sixty-three Club years our informative pro­ \. grams and social contacts have advised us of the needs and challenges, and our classes and workshops have provided us with the necessary knowledge and special skills to meet them.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2020 Commencement Program Book
    Spring 2020 Fayetteville, Arkansas Contents: Commencement Program – 3 The Academic Procession – 4 The Official Party – 5 Notes on Ceremony – 6 Honorary Degree Recipient – 7 Degree Candidates – 8 Senior Scholars – 25 Past Honorary Degree Recipients – 82 Board of Trustees – 84 Colleges: Graduate School – 3 School of Law – 21 Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences – 27 Fay Jones School of Architecture and Design – 36 J. William Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences – 38 College of Education and Health Professions – 50 College of Engineering – 57 Sam M. Walton College of Business – 68 2 GRADUATE SCHOOL SPRING 2020 2 THE ACADEMIC PROCESSION Chief Marshal and Bearer of the Mace Candidates for Specialist Degrees The Official Party Candidates for Master’s Degrees Faculty of the University Candidates for Juris Doctor Degrees Candidates for Doctoral Degrees Candidates for Baccalaureate Degrees Chief Marshal and Bearer of the Mace Stephen Caldwell, Chair of the Campus Faculty Associate Professor, Music Marshals Adnan A. K. Alrubaye, Research Assistant Douglas D. Rhoads, University Professor, Professor, Biological Sciences Biological Sciences and Poultry Science Barbara B. Shadden, University Professor Emerita, Valerie H. Hunt, Associate Professor, Rehabilitation, Human Resources and Political Science Communication Disorders Charles Leflar,Clinical Professor, Kate Shoulders, Associate Professor, Accounting Agricultural Education, Communication and Harry Pierson, Assistant Professor, Technology Industrial Engineering Anna Zajicek, Professor, Sociology and Criminology Banner Carriers Nancy Arnold, Director of Credit Studies, John M. Norwood, Professor, Global Campus Accounting Kristopher R. Brye, Professor, Graduate School and Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences International Education Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Gary Prinz, Associate Professor, Life Sciences Civil Engineering Alphonso W.
    [Show full text]
  • 1959 *I975 the Mills Committee
    1959 *I975 The Mills Committee The House Committee on Ways and Means maintainea a position 01 power and prestige during the 16 years of Wilbur Mills’ chairmanship (1958-1974). The Arkansas Democrat was one of the most influential leaders in congressional history. His committee’s bills, most often con- sidered under closed rules, had an enviable record of success in the House. Mills also had great success in dealing with the Senate in con- ference committee. A congressional reform movement in the early 1970s altered, if not weakened, the committee by 1) enlarging it from 25 to 37 members, 2) creating permanent subcommittees, and 3) re- moving its Democratic members’ function as their party’s Committee on Committees. Personal problems led to Mills’ resignation from the chairmanship in 1974. “I think a book on the he congressional committee system developed its greatest struc- IVays and Means T tural stability in the period from the end of World War I1 Cornmillee would have to through the 1960s. Only one standing committee was added in both the House and the Senate. With the exceptions of but two Congresses be a book on Wilbur (the Eightieth, 1947-1949, and the Eighty-third, 1953-1955), the Milk ” (Anonymous Democratic Party maintained control of both Houses. Moreover, member of the Committee membership was extremely stable, with more than 80 percent of mem- on Ways and Means, bers reelected from one Congress to the next. In the context of this 1970) overall structural stability, strong committee chairmen reemerged, in- cluding over 20 who served for more than a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Coattails: Explaining John Paul Hammerschmidt's Victory in 1966 Jesse Ray Sims University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 Beyond Coattails: Explaining John Paul Hammerschmidt's Victory in 1966 Jesse Ray Sims University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the American Politics Commons, American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Sims, Jesse Ray, "Beyond Coattails: Explaining John Paul Hammerschmidt's Victory in 1966" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 1968. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1968 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Beyond Coattails: Explaining John Paul Hammerschmidt’s Victory in 1966 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History by Jesse Sims University of Arkansas Bachelor of Arts in History, 2015 May 2017 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ____________________________________ Dr. Patrick Williams Thesis Director ____________________________________ Dr. Michael Pierce Committee Member ____________________________________ Dr. Jeannie Whayne Committee Member Abstract This study examines the campaign issues, demographic factors, and voting trends that helped Republican John Paul Hammerschmidt defeat incumbent Democratic congressman James W. Trimble in Arkansas’s third congressional district in 1966. Much of the historiography addressing this election largely neglects the historic significance of Hammerschmidt’s successful campaign and the factors contributing to his victory. Instead, historians primarily write about the election of Republican Winthrop Rockefeller to the governor’s office that year.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelve Elections That Shaped a Century I Tawdry Populism, Timid Progressivism, 1900-1930
    Arkansas Politics in the 20th Century: Twelve Elections That Shaped a Century I Tawdry Populism, Timid Progressivism, 1900-1930 One-gallus Democracy Not with a whimper but a bellow did the 20th century begin in Arkansas. The people’s first political act in the new century was to install in the governor’s office, for six long years, a politician who was described in the most graphic of many colorful epigrams as “a carrot-headed, red-faced, loud-mouthed, strong-limbed, ox-driving mountaineer lawyer that has come to Little Rock to get a reputation — a friend of the fellow who brews forty-rod bug juice back in the mountains.”1 He was the Tribune of the Haybinders, the Wild Ass of the Ozarks, Karl Marx for the Hillbillies, the Stormy Petrel, Messiah of the Rednecks, and King of the Cockleburs. Jeff Davis talked a better populism than he practiced. In three terms, 14 years overall in statewide office, Davis did not leave an indelible mark on the government or the quality of life of the working people whom he extolled and inspired, but he dominated the state thoroughly for 1 This quotation from the Helena Weekly World appears in slightly varied forms in numerous accounts of Davis's yers. It appeared in the newspaper in the spring of 1899 and appears in John Gould Fletcher, Arkansas (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1947) p. 2. This version, which includes the phrase "that has come to Little Rock to get a reputation" appears in Raymond Arsenault, The Wild Ass of the Ozarks: Jeff Davis and the Social Bases of Southern Politics (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1984), p.
    [Show full text]