DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluating Benefits of Mangroves on Fish Pond Production and Protection in Ajuy, Panay Island, the Philippines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluating Benefits of Mangroves on Fish Pond Production and Protection in Ajuy, Panay Island, the Philippines Evaluating Benefits of Mangroves on Fish Pond Production and Protection in Ajuy, Panay Island, the Philippines Natalie Jaworska September 2010 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science and the Diploma of Imperial College London. 1 Success will be had on the day my grandchildren walk with me through these habitats, understanding their importance, appreciating their diversity, and captivated by their magic (Primavera, J. H. 2005) 2 DECLARATION OF OWN WORK I declare that this thesis (insert full title) …………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………… is entirely my own work and that where material could be construed as the work of others, it is fully cited and referenced, and/or with appropriate acknowledgement given. Signature …………………………………………………….. Name of student …………………………………………….. (please print) Name of Supervisor …………………………………………. 3 Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 10 1.1 Aims and Objectives ........................................................................................................... 11 1.1.1 Aims .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.1.2 Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.1.3 Hypotheses .................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Thesis Structure Overview ................................................................................................. 12 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Mangroves ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.1.1 Mangroves and Ecosystem Services ............................................................................. 13 2.1.2 Mangroves in the Philippines ........................................................................................ 14 2.2 Aquaculture ......................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 History ........................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Management .................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.3 Pests .............................................................................................................................. 18 2.2.4 Impacts .......................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.5 The Future of Aquaculture ............................................................................................ 23 2.3 Reviews of Mangrove Benefits for Aquaculture .............................................................. 24 2.3.1 Waste Water Treatment ................................................................................................ 24 2.3.2 Nutrient Inputs .............................................................................................................. 25 2.3.3 Protection ...................................................................................................................... 25 2.4 Law ....................................................................................................................................... 27 2.4.1 Legislation Shortfalls .................................................................................................... 27 2.4.2 Mangrove Replanting and Rehabilitation ..................................................................... 28 2.5 Mangrove Structure ............................................................................................................ 30 2.6 Project Variables ................................................................................................................. 31 2.7 Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 31 3.0 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 32 3.1 Data Collection .................................................................................................................... 32 3.2 Research Assistants and Logistics ..................................................................................... 33 3.3 Social Research .................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.1 Pilot Study ..................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.2 Questionnaire Interviews .............................................................................................. 33 3.4 Mangrove Surveys .............................................................................................................. 35 4 3.5 Mangrove Calculations ....................................................................................................... 37 3.6 Data Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 38 4.0 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 39 4.1 Production ........................................................................................................................... 39 4.1.1 Anderson Darling Test in Minitab ................................................................................ 40 4.1.2 Pearson‟s Parametric Correlation Analysis in Minitab ................................................. 40 4.1.3 Response and Explanatory Variable Interactions ......................................................... 40 4.1.4 Production Analysis in R .............................................................................................. 41 4.2 Protection ............................................................................................................................. 46 4.2.1 Protection Analysis in R with Response Variable: Frequency of Dike Breaching ....... 46 4.2.2 Protection Analysis in R with Response Variable: Time Since Last Dike Breaching .. 47 4.3 Additional Analyses ............................................................................................................ 48 5.0 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 50 5.1 Production ........................................................................................................................... 50 5.1.1 Mangrove Area ............................................................................................................. 50 5.1.2 Pond Management......................................................................................................... 52 5.1.3 Additional Production Considerations .......................................................................... 54 5.1.3.1 Production and Fry Source ............................................................................................ 54 5.1.3.2 Production and Additional Recruitment........................................................................ 55 5.1.3.3 Production and Pond Water Source .............................................................................. 56 5.2 Protection ............................................................................................................................. 57 5.2.1 Dike Breach Frequency and Time Since Last Breaching ............................................. 57 5.3 Additional Mangrove Benefits ........................................................................................... 60 5.4 Additional Notes .................................................................................................................. 61 5.5 Strengths and Limitations .................................................................................................. 61 5.5.1 Strengths ....................................................................................................................... 61 5.5.2 Limitations .................................................................................................................... 61 5.5.2.1 Mangrove Surveys ........................................................................................................ 61 5.5.2.2 Interview Surveys ......................................................................................................... 62 5.6 Future Recommendations .................................................................................................. 64 5.7 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 67 6.0 References ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of a Fish Pond in Optimizing Nutrient Flows in Integrated Agriculture-Aquaculture Farming Systems
    The role of a fish pond in optimizing nutrient flows in integrated agriculture-aquaculture farming systems Dang Kieu Nhan Promotor: Prof. Dr. J.A.J. Verreth Hoogleraar Aquacultuur en Visserij Wageningen Universiteit Co-promotor: Dr. M.C.J. Verdegem Universitair Docent, Leerstoelgroep Aquacultuur en Visserij Wageningen Universiteit Promotiecommissie: Prof. Dr. Ir. A.J. van der Zijpp Wageningen Universiteit Dr. M. Ana Milstein Fish and Aquaculture Research Station, Israel Prof. Dr. R. Ruben Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen Prof. Dr. Nguyen Anh Tuan Can Tho University, Vietnam Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoeksschool Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS) The role of a fish pond in optimizing nutrient flows in integrated agriculture-aquaculture farming systems Dang Kieu Nhan Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. dr. M.J.Kropff, in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 3 oktober 2007 des namiddags te vier uur in de Aula Nhan, D.K., 2007. The role of a fish pond in optimizing nutrient flows in integrated agriculture-aquaculture farming systems. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands ISBN: 978-90-8504-739-1 Contents Chapter 1 General introduction 1 Chapter 2 Integrated freshwater aquaculture, crop and livestock production in 9 the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: determinants and the role of the pond Chapter 3 Food inputs, water quality and nutrient accumulation in integrated 37 pond systems: a multivariate approach Chapter 4 Water and nutrient budgets of ponds in integrated agriculture- 67 aquaculture systems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam Chapter 5 Economic and nutrient discharge tradeoffs of excreta-fed 93 aquaculture in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam Chapter 6 General discussion 121 References 133 Summary (English) 145 Summary (Dutch) 149 Summary (Vietnamese) 153 Acknowledgements 157 Training and Supervision Plan 159 Curriculum vitae 160 List of publications 161 Chapter 1 General introduction Chapter 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services Generated by Fish Populations
    AR-211 Ecological Economics 29 (1999) 253 –268 ANALYSIS Ecosystem services generated by fish populations Cecilia M. Holmlund *, Monica Hammer Natural Resources Management, Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, S-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden Abstract In this paper, we review the role of fish populations in generating ecosystem services based on documented ecological functions and human demands of fish. The ongoing overexploitation of global fish resources concerns our societies, not only in terms of decreasing fish populations important for consumption and recreational activities. Rather, a number of ecosystem services generated by fish populations are also at risk, with consequences for biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and ultimately human welfare. Examples are provided from marine and freshwater ecosystems, in various parts of the world, and include all life-stages of fish. Ecosystem services are here defined as fundamental services for maintaining ecosystem functioning and resilience, or demand-derived services based on human values. To secure the generation of ecosystem services from fish populations, management approaches need to address the fact that fish are embedded in ecosystems and that substitutions for declining populations and habitat losses, such as fish stocking and nature reserves, rarely replace losses of all services. © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Ecosystem services; Fish populations; Fisheries management; Biodiversity 1. Introduction 15 000 are marine and nearly 10 000 are freshwa­ ter (Nelson, 1994). Global capture fisheries har­ Fish constitute one of the major protein sources vested 101 million tonnes of fish including 27 for humans around the world. There are to date million tonnes of bycatch in 1995, and 11 million some 25 000 different known fish species of which tonnes were produced in aquaculture the same year (FAO, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Nation's Lakes
    A Survey of the Nation’s Lakes – EPA’s National Lake Assessment and Survey of Vermont Lakes Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation - Water Quality Division 103 South Main 10N Waterbury VT 05671-0408 www.vtwaterquality.org Prepared by Julia Larouche, Environmental Technician II January 2009 Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures........................................................................................................................................................................... ii Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 What We Measured..................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Water Quality and Trophic Status Indicators.......................................................................................................................................... 4 Acidification Indicator............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Ecological Integrity Indicators................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Nearshore Habitat Indicators
    [Show full text]
  • Moe Pond Limnology and Fisii Population Biology: an Ecosystem Approach
    MOE POND LIMNOLOGY AND FISII POPULATION BIOLOGY: AN ECOSYSTEM APPROACH C. Mead McCoy, C. P.Madenjian, J. V. Adall1s, W. N. I-Iannan, D. M. Warner, M. F. Albright, and L. P. Sohacki BIOLOGICAL FIELD STArrION COOPERSTOWN, NEW YORK Occasional Paper No. 33 January 2000 STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT ONEONTA ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my gratitude to the members of my graduate committee: Willard Harman, Leonard Sohacki and Bruce Dayton for their comments in the preparation of this manuscript; and for the patience and understanding they exhibited w~lile I was their student. ·1 want to also thank Matthew Albright for his skills in quantitative analyses of total phosphorous and nitrite/nitrate-N conducted on water samples collected from Moe Pond during this study. I thank David Ramsey for his friendship and assistance in discussing chlorophyll a methodology. To all the SUNY Oneonta BFS interns who lent-a-hand during the Moe Pond field work of 1994 and 1995, I thank you for your efforts and trust that the spine wounds suffered were not in vain. To all those at USGS Great Lakes Science Center who supported my efforts through encouragement and facilities - Jerrine Nichols, Douglas Wilcox, Bruce Manny, James Hickey and Nancy Milton, I thank all of you. Also to Donald Schloesser, with whom I share an office, I would like to thank you for your many helpful suggestions concerning the estimation of primary production in aquatic systems. In particular, I wish to express my appreciation to Charles Madenjian and Jean Adams for their combined quantitative prowess, insight and direction in data analyses and their friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • RIPARIAN AREASAREAS Updatedupdated June 21, 2012
    RIPARIAN AREASAREAS UpdatedUpdated June 21, 2012 A 2012 Critical Areas Update Fact Sheet THE ROLE OF RIPARIAN AREAS Some of our most valuable habitat for the diverse Trees that fall into the wildlife in Thurston County – “riparian habitat” – is water form sheltered pools found along water bodies such as rivers, streams, where fi sh can lay eggs. lakes and marine (salt water) shorelines. In the past, The trees and pools also these areas have been referred to as buffers, and the supply insects and organic terms are still used interchangeably in some cases. materials for the aquatic food chain. Approximately Riparian habitat refers to the transitional areas 90 percent of all wildlife use between the upland environment and the water. riparian areas for part or all Riparian habitats moderate the temperature of water of their life cycles. bodies, help prevent erosion, and provide a home for many types of animals and vegetation. Although Potential amendments to the Critical Areas Ordinance riparian areas are located alongside the water, they seek to protect habitat and healthy functioning also provide habitat within the water. ecosystems in order to support viable populations of fi sh and wildlife in Thurston County. ABOUT WATER TYPE CLASSIFICATIONS Like the existing Critical Areas Ordinance, the The DNR classifi cations are: potential amendments would set riparian areas according to how the streams and water bodies • Type S: Streams and water bodies that are are classifi ed or “typed” by the state Department designated “Shorelines of the State” as defi ned in of Natural Resources. The water types are based chapter 90.58.030 RCW.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Trends of Dike-Ponds Between 1978 and 2016 Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Images in Shunde District of South China
    sustainability Article Analyzing Trends of Dike-Ponds between 1978 and 2016 Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Images in Shunde District of South China Fengshou Li 1, Kai Liu 1,* , Huanli Tang 2, Lin Liu 3,4,* and Hongxing Liu 4,5 1 Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Public Security and Disaster, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; [email protected] 2 Guangzhou Zengcheng District Urban and Rural Planning and Surveying and Mapping Geographic Information Institute, Guangzhou 511300, China; [email protected] 3 Center of Geo-Informatics for Public Security, School of Geographic Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China 4 Department of Geography and Geographic Information Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of Geography, the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.L.); [email protected] (L.L.); Tel.: +86-020-8411-3044 (K.L.); +1-513-556-3429 (L.L.); Fax: +86-020-8411-3057 (K.L. & L.L.) Received: 27 August 2018; Accepted: 26 September 2018; Published: 30 September 2018 Abstract: Dike-ponds have experienced significant changes in the Pearl River Delta region over the past several decades, especially since China’s economic reform, which has seriously affected the construction of ecological environments. In order to monitor the evolution of dike-ponds, in this study we use multi-source remote sensing images from 1978 to 2016 to extract dike-ponds in several periods using the nearest neighbor classification method.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Guidelines for the Management of Pond Fish Culture
    International Journal of Environment Sciences Vol. 5 No.INTERNATIONAL 2 (July-December, 2019) JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 3, No 6, 2013 Received:© Copyright 14th May by 2019the authors Revised: - Licensee 30th June IPA 2019- Under Accepted: Creative 15th Commons July 2019 license 3.0 Research article ISSN 0976 – 4402 Water quality guidelines for the management of pond fish culture Anita Bhatnagar, Pooja Devi Department of Zoology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India-136119 [email protected] doi: 10.6088/ijes.2013030600019 ABSTRACT The Optimum fish production is totally dependent on the physical, chemical and biological qualities of water to most of the extent. Hence, successful pond management requires an understanding of water quality. Water quality is determined by variables like temperature, transparency, turbidity, water colour, carbon dioxide, pH, alkalinity, hardness, unionised ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, primary productivity, BOD, plankton population etc. In the present chapter water quality management principles in fish culture have been reviewed to make aware the fish culturist and environmentalist about the important water quality factors that influence health of a pond and are required in optimum values to increase the fish yields to meet the growing demands of present day scenario of the world, when the food resources are in a state of depletion and the population pressure is increasing on these resources. Keywords: Assessment and Monitoring, Culture, Fish productivity, Parameters, Water quality 1. Introduction Fish is an inexpensive source of protein and an important cash crop in many regions of world and water is the physical support in which they carry out their life functions such as feeding, swimming, breeding, digestion and excretion (Bronmark and Hansson, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Homeowners Guide to Protecting Ponds and Wetlands
    Homeowners Guide to Protecting Ponds and Wetlands Weston has several small ponds throughout town. Most of these ponds were originally man-made either by building a dam (i.e. Hobbs Pond and College Pond) or by dredging an area along a stream. Weston’s ponds provide habitat for numerous birds, fish, turtles, frogs, and mammals. Because these ponds are often shallow, controlling aquatic plants from over-taking them can be a challenge. Several Weston homeowners have hired professionals to prepare and implement pond management programs. These programs often involve hand removal and/or chemical treatment to control nuisance or invasive aquatic plants. However, it’s important for pond abutters to know that they too directly affect pond health and water quality. This brochure lists several ways homeowners can help protect Weston’s ponds and wetlands. 1. Nature likes it Messy Some people want to “clean up” nature to create a park like appearance. However, wildlife often needs thick tangles of undergrowth, leaf litter, and deadwood to survive. Aquatic plants are a vital part of any healthy pond and wetland ecosystem. Plants and algae provide many benefits to the pond: roots help to prevent muddy water by stabilizing the pond bottom and banks. Pond plants use nutrients that may be taken up by nuisance algae. The stems, roots, and leaves of pond plants serve as important wildlife habitat for small pond animals such as dragonfly nymphs, tadpoles, and crayfish. If you are concerned that there are too many nuisance plants or algae growing in your pond, the law requires that you speak to the Conservation Commission prior to doing any vegetation removal or chemical treatments within or near the pond.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Comparison Walk Grades
    HHHaaabbbiii tttaaat CCt ooompmpmpaaarrriii sssooon WWn aaalllk (K-2)(K-2)k Overview: In this activity, students will hike through and compare five different refuge habitats, looking for plants and animals in each habitat, and working on a Habitat Hunt Sheet. Content Standards Correlations: Science, p. 293 Grades: K-2 TTTiii mmme FFe rrramamame fofoe r CCr ooondndnduuuccctttinining TTg hihihis AAs CCCtttiii vvviii tytyty Key Concepts: A habitat Recommended Time: 30 minutes provides a home for a plant or Introduction (5 minutes) animal, with suitable food, • discuss the five habitats from the Eucalyptus Grove Overlook water, shelter, and space. • hand out binoculars, clipboards, pencils, and Habitat Hunt (if There are five habitats along provided) the trail: the upland, salt marsh, slough, mudflats, and Habitat Walk (22 minutes) salt pond. Each habitat • hike the trail from the Eucalyptus Grove Overlook to the Hunter’s supports plants and animals Cabin, walking through the upland, the salt marsh, over the slough that are adapted to living in it. and mudflats, and ending at the salt pond Objectives: • stop at the numbered stops on the map and lead discussions Students will be able to: about the habitats and the plants and animals in each habitat • identify and compare the Discussion (3 minutes) five habitats on the refuge • answer any questions about the Habitat Hunt, using the answer • identify one plant or animal sheet in each habitat • collect the equipment and Habitat Hunt Sheets Materials: Provided by the Refuge: HHHooow Thihihis AAs
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Culture in Brackish Water
    Fish Culture in Brackish Water. Item Type Journal Contribution Authors Nzioka, R.M. Download date 01/10/2021 17:26:10 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/7089 POST KENYA v.5 no. 2 May-August 1980 FISH CULTURE IN BRACKISH WATER R. M. Nzioka, Ketrya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute Introduction loose initial structure of the mud changes as moisture Brackish water is a mixture of fresh and salty water is diminished by evaporation and transpiration. The which usually occurs in estuaries, and has a salinity process of drying out results in the shrinking of the soil usually of between 15 and 30 per thousand, depending wItil it attains the proper physical character of pond on rainfall and freshwater run-off. barrier. Even though ponds very close to the shore are Some fish species like mullets are able to survive filled with undiluted seawater the great amount of rain­ in this environment. Most of the Mugi/idae shoal swim water trapped in the ponds during the monsoons, makes in or near the surface of the water and may be seen it not possible for salinity values equal or higher than jumping repeatedly in estuaries usually in the evenings. those of seawater to occur in the ponds at any time M. cepha/us and Liza aurata are potential species for other than during prolonged periods of drought. culture. These species occur in vast numbers and have very firm flesh of excellent flavour. They spawn in the Aquaculture tropics mostly from September to October. During this period they migrate away from estuaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Your Fish Pond Water Analsysis Report
    Cooperative Aquaculture/Fisheries Extension Program University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff Understanding Your Fish Pond Water Analysis Report Nathan M. Stone Figure 1 Extension Fisheries Water Analysis Report: Fish Specialist (Example) Hugh K. Thomforde pH - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -7.24 Extension Aquaculture Some sportfish and aquaculture Electrical Conductivity - - -205 mSiemens/cm Specialist pond owners choose to submit water Alkalinity, Total - - - - - 100.00 mg/l as CaCO3 samples to the University of Hardness, Total - - - - -103.80 mg/l as CaCO3 Arkansas Cooperative Extension CO (Carbonate) - - - - - 0.09 mg/l as CaCO Service for analysis. The water 3 3 samples are mailed to the Water HCO3 (Bicarbonate) - - 99.90 mg/l as CaCO3 Quality Laboratory, Arkansas Water Fe (Iron) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -0.05 mg/l Resources Center, University of Mn (Manganese) - - - - - - - - - - - - -0.01 mg/l Arkansas at Fayetteville. The labora­ F (Fluoride) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -0.15 mg/l tory tests the water and sends the Cl (Chloride) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -3.13 mg/l results back. Below are some guide­ lines for interpreting those results. SO4 (Sulfate) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.21 mg/l These guidelines describe how to NO3 (Nitrate) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.04 mg/l interpret results for both surface NO3-N (Nitrate-Nitrogen) - - - - - - - 0.01 mg/l waters and ground waters. Surface NH -N (Ammonia-Nitrogen) - - - - - 0.11 mg/l waters are those exposed to the air 3 and sunlight, such as streams, ponds, NO2-N (Nitrite-Nitrogen) - - - - - - - - 0.00 mg/l reservoirs and lakes. Ground waters PO4 (Phosphate) - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.06 mg/l are waters from wells or springs tapping underground aquifers and are often devoid of dissolved oxygen. These waters may also contain high levelsInterpreting of dissolved Results gasses or iron.
    [Show full text]
  • Silvofishery Pond: an Alternative to Disaster Mitigation Efforts
    Silvofishery Pond: An Alternative to Disaster Mitigation Efforts Meilinda Suriani Harefa 1, Zulkifli Nasution 2, Miswar Budi Mulya 3, Azhar Maksum 4 {[email protected] 1, [email protected] 2, [email protected] 3, [email protected] 4} Universitas Sumatera Utara, North Sumatera, Indonesia Abstract. This study aims to determine the background of the community practiced silvofishery pond model to mitigate disaster in Tanjungrejo village, district of Percut Sei Tuan, Deli Serdang regency. This research was conducted with a questionnaire tool, interviews and field observations of 22 informants who have good pond infrastructure and have been practicing silvofishery pond model for 5 years. This research uses the descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The results showed that all of the questions asked to farmers, there were 10 statements that were submitted and 4 of them were the most frequent statements that could be a conclusion about the background of the fish-farmer practised silvofishery pond model, including percentage of mangrove in the pond, affects non- cultivation production during the high tide (95 %), total area of mangrove stands has a positive impact on the activity of crab enlargement in the pond (91%), maintaining the presence of mangroves around the pond can better affect fisheries production (91%), and the number of stands mangroves in ponds can prevent damage from wave blows (86%). As the factors that indicate silvofishery pond model as one of disaster mitigation efforts is the continuity of the mangrove function as an instrument to protect the land from erosion and abrasion, the presence of mangroves on the pond can reduce and absorb strong winds from the sea and as a producer of organic materials that support the food chain.
    [Show full text]