UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Responding to Campus
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Responding to Campus Racism: Analyzing Student Activism and Institutional Responses A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Education by Katherine Soojin Cho 2020 © Copyright by Katherine Soojin Cho 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Responding to Campus Racism: Analyzing Student Activism and Institutional Responses by Katherine Soojin Cho Doctor of Philosophy in Education University of California, Los Angeles, 2020 Professor Sylvia Hurtado, Chair Scholarship on student activism describes how protests, demonstrations, and hunger strikes push higher education institutions towards progress and increased institutional accountability. However, cyclical demands, particularly from Student-Activists of Color regarding campus racism, suggest more complexity at the institutional level. In comparing the responses of two public higher education institutions from 2015 to 2018, this study explored the responses by senior-level administrators, faculty, and governing boards to determine how they align with students’ concerns. Their multiple perspectives, competing demands, and layered dynamics complicate what are considered to be the institutional responses and how they are perceived by Student-Activists of Color. Situating student activism through the Institutional Response Framework, this comparative case study employs document collection, archives, and interviews. Moreover, in the traditions of Critical Race Theory and Black Feminism, these responses are contextualized within the sociopolitical histories of each campus to further illuminate the roles of incrementalism, reputation, and trust. Through critical discourse analysis and thematic analysis, I ii map these patterns, tactics, and considerations onto three dimensions of the Institutional Response Framework: control, demand, and institutionalized racism. Findings reveal how responses minimize students’ concerns, criminalize activism, co-opt initiatives, and only “claim diversity” through empty dialogues.
[Show full text]