DOCSLIB.ORG

UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Responding to Campus Racism: Analyzing Student Activism and Institutional Responses Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7j10b4kn Author Cho, Katherine Soojin Publication Date 2020 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Responding to Campus Racism: Analyzing Student Activism and Institutional Responses A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Education by Katherine Soojin Cho 2020 © Copyright by Katherine Soojin Cho 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Responding to Campus Racism: Analyzing Student Activism and Institutional Responses by Katherine Soojin Cho Doctor of Philosophy in Education University of California, Los Angeles, 2020 Professor Sylvia Hurtado, Chair Scholarship on student activism describes how protests, demonstrations, and hunger strikes push higher education institutions towards progress and increased institutional accountability. However, cyclical demands, particularly from Student-Activists of Color regarding campus racism, suggest more complexity at the institutional level. In comparing the responses of two public higher education institutions from 2015 to 2018, this study explored the responses by senior-level administrators, faculty, and governing boards to determine how they align with students’ concerns. Their multiple perspectives, competing demands, and layered dynamics complicate what are considered to be the institutional responses and how they are perceived by Student-Activists of Color. Situating student activism through the Institutional Response Framework, this comparative case study employs document collection, archives, and interviews. Moreover, in the traditions of Critical Race Theory and Black Feminism, these responses are contextualized within the sociopolitical histories of each campus to further illuminate the roles of incrementalism, reputation, and trust. Through critical discourse analysis and thematic analysis, I ii map these patterns, tactics, and considerations onto three dimensions of the Institutional Response Framework: control, demand, and institutionalized racism. Findings reveal how responses minimize students’ concerns, criminalize activism, co-opt initiatives, and only “claim diversity” through empty dialogues. Yet, responses also result in educational initiatives, new curricula, changes in institutional policies, and strategic ways to “protect” students. The decision-making rationales regarding morality, the university’s “best interests,” and peer group comparisons reflect the larger narratives of embedded whiteness, racism, anti-Blackness, and neoliberalism within higher education. The subtle and sometimes stark differences between these perceptions and responses demonstrate the positional pressures and competing goals of each of these groups, while still inching towards institutional improvement. The functionality of the Institutional Response Framework and mapping these differences serve as an analytical tool to inform actionable practices. The study’s intersection of organizational theory and Critical Race Theory provides a unique interrogation of how racism and color-evasiveness materialize at the institutional level. Lastly, the research design offers an alternate methodological praxis that places under scrutiny an underexplored participant: the institution and its racialized dynamics. iii The dissertation of Katherine Soojin Cho is approved. Mitchell J. Chang Valerie J. Matsumoto Cecilia Rios-Aguilar Daniel G. Solórzano Sylvia Hurtado, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2020 iv DEDICATION To the generations who fought knowing that the futures dreamed would not become realities in their lifetime v TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract of Dissertation...................................................................................................................ii Dedication........................................................................................................................................v List of Figures and Tables............................................................................................................. xi Acknowledgments.........................................................................................................................xii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................1 Background of the Problem.......................................................................................................1 Purpose of the Study..................................................................................................................2 Research Questions..............................................................................................................3 Scope of Study...........................................................................................................................4 Driving Motivation....................................................................................................................7 Significance................................................................................................................................8 CHAPTER TWO: (RE)FRAMING THE NARRATIVE OF STUDENT ACTIVISM...................9 Background and Current Context..............................................................................................9 Key Terms................................................................................................................................12 Student Activism............................................................................................................... 12 Racism and Campus Racial Climates............................................................................... 13 Institutional as Normative Structures................................................................................ 14 Institutionalized Racism.................................................................................................... 15 Student Activism and Race/Racism Research......................................................................... 15 Topics within Student Activism Research........................................................................ 16 How Student Activism has been Studied.......................................................................... 16 The Role of Administrative Allies and Institutional Documents.......................................17 Framing Student Activism and Its Related Theories...............................................................18 Race and Racism as Center Stage......................................................................................19 Shifting to Organizations and Institutions........................................................................ 21 Power, Performativity, and Partnerships.......................................................................... 22 Institutional Response Framework......................................................................................... 23 Demands, Dynamics, and Dimensions............................................................................. 24 The Four Types of Responses........................................................................................... 25 The Dimension of Institutional Racism............................................................................ 27 Function and Testing the Institutional Response Framework........................................... 28 CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS...................................................30 Comparative Case Study Methodology...................................................................................30 Case Criteria.......................................................................................................................31 Timeframe....................................................................................................................32 The Approach of Replication and Embedded Units....................................................33 The Praxis of Anonymity.........................................................................................................34 Case Contexts..........................................................................................................................35 Campus Identities and Concerns........................................................................................35 The South and Confederate Tradition.........................................................................36 The Embedded Cases within UVA....................................................................................36 vi Student-Activists of Color..........................................................................................36 Senior-Level Administrators......................................................................................37 Board of Visitors........................................................................................................38 Faculty........................................................................................................................39 The Embedded Cases within UNC-CH.............................................................................40 Students-Activists of Color..........................................................................................40
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: to Stop the Defamation of the Jewish People and to Secure Justice and Fair Treatment for All
    A report from the Center on Extremism 09 18 New Hate and Old: The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment for all. ABOUT T H E CENTER ON EXTREMISM The ADL Center on Extremism (COE) is one of the world’s foremost authorities ADL (Anti-Defamation on extremism, terrorism, anti-Semitism and all forms of hate. For decades, League) fights anti-Semitism COE’s staff of seasoned investigators, analysts and researchers have tracked and promotes justice for all. extremist activity and hate in the U.S. and abroad – online and on the ground. The staff, which represent a combined total of substantially more than 100 Join ADL to give a voice to years of experience in this arena, routinely assist law enforcement with those without one and to extremist-related investigations, provide tech companies with critical data protect our civil rights. and expertise, and respond to wide-ranging media requests. Learn more: adl.org As ADL’s research and investigative arm, COE is a clearinghouse of real-time information about extremism and hate of all types. COE staff regularly serve as expert witnesses, provide congressional testimony and speak to national and international conference audiences about the threats posed by extremism and anti-Semitism. You can find the full complement of COE’s research and publications at ADL.org. Cover: White supremacists exchange insults with counter-protesters as they attempt to guard the entrance to Emancipation Park during the ‘Unite the Right’ rally August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccorkle PLACE
    CHAPTER EIGHT: McCORKLE PLACE McCorkle Place is said to be the most densely memorialized piece of real estate in North Carolina.501 On the University’s symbolic front lawn, there are almost a dozen monuments and memorials fundamental to the University’s lore and traditions, but only two monuments within the space have determined the role of McCorkle Place as a space for racial justice movements.502 The Unsung Founders Memorial and the University’s Confederate Monument were erected on the oldest quad of the campus almost a century apart for dramatically different memorial purposes. The former honors the enslaved and freed Black persons who “helped build” the University, while the latter commemorated, until its toppling in August 2018, “the sons of the University who entered the war of 1861-65.”503 Separated by only a few dozen yards, the physical distinctions between the two monuments were, before the Confederate Monument was toppled, quite striking. The Unsung 501 Johnathan Michels, “Who Gets to be Remembered In Chapel Hill?,” Scalawag Magazine, 8 October 2016, <https://www.scalawagmagazine.org/2016/10/whats-in-a-name/>. 502 Timothy J. McMillan, “Remembering Forgetting: A Monument to Erasure at the University of North Carolina,” in Silence, Screen and Spectacle: Rethinking Social Memory in the Age of Information, ed. Lindsay A. Freeman, Benjamin Nienass, and Rachel Daniell, 137-162, (Berghahn Book: New York, New York, 2004): 139-142; Other memorials and sites of memory within McCorkle Place include the Old Well, the Davie Poplar, Old East, the Caldwell Monument, a Memorial to Founding Trustees, and the Speaker Ban Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Umass Selects a New President: Elements of a Search Strategy Richard A
    New England Journal of Public Policy Volume 8 | Issue 2 Article 3 9-23-1992 UMass Selects a New President: Elements of a Search Strategy Richard A. Hogarty University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp Part of the Education Policy Commons, and the Higher Education Administration Commons Recommended Citation Hogarty, Richard A. (1992) "UMass Selects a New President: Elements of a Search Strategy," New England Journal of Public Policy: Vol. 8: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp/vol8/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in New England Journal of Public Policy by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UMass Selects a Elements of a New President Search Strategy Richard A. Hogarty The selection of a new university president, an event of major importance in academic life, is usually filled with tensions on the part of those concerned about its outcome. The 1992 presidential search at the University of Massachusetts exemplifies such ten- sions. There were mixed reactions to the overall performance. When they finished reviewing candidates, the search committee had eliminated all but Michael K. Hooker, who, they deemed, has the necessary competence, vision, and stature for the task. The main conflict centered on the question of "process" versus "product. " The trustees rejoiced in what they considered an impressive choice, while many faculty were angered over what they considered a terrible process.
    [Show full text]
  • Carol L. Folt to Become USC's 12Th President
    Carol L. Folt to become USC BoardUSC’s of Trustees selects 12th internationally president recognized biologist and former University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill chancellor to lead the university into new era. Carol L. Folt will become the 12th president of the University of Southern California. Photo by Gus Ruelas By USC News staff | March 20, 2019 NOTED LIFE SCIENTIST, TEACHER AND was known for advancing student access we spoke to over a hundred diverse and academic leader Carol L. Folt will become and affordability, promoting research, world-class candidates. Dr. Folt stood out the University of Southern California’s discovery and academic excellence at from the very beginning as a courageous and 12th president, the USC Board of Trustees the university, and steering the campus compassionate person who always places announced today. toward greater accountability. the well-being of students, faculty, staff Formerly chancellor of the University of “As I have come to know Dr. Folt and and patients at the heart of all she does. North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Folt how she thinks, it is clear that USC has “She has a deep appreciation for the brings decades of experience in academia chosen a brilliant, principled leader with breadth and depth of USC’s mission, and to USC, launching a new era for the clarity of purpose and integrity to lead I’m confident she will further strengthen 139-year-old university. She will take the university forward and upward,” said the academic and athletic programs, office as USC’s new president on July 1.
    [Show full text]
  • FUNDING HATE How White Supremacists Raise Their Money
    How White Supremacists FUNDING HATE Raise Their Money 1 RESPONDING TO HATE FUNDING HATE INTRODUCTION 1 SELF-FUNDING 2 ORGANIZATIONAL FUNDING 3 CRIMINAL ACTIVITY 9 THE NEW KID ON THE BLOCK: CROWDFUNDING 10 BITCOIN AND CRYPTOCURRENCIES 11 THE FUTURE OF WHITE SUPREMACIST FUNDING 14 2 RESPONDING TO HATE How White Supremacists FUNDING HATE Raise Their Money It’s one of the most frequent questions the Anti-Defamation League gets asked: WHERE DO WHITE SUPREMACISTS GET THEIR MONEY? Implicit in this question is the assumption that white supremacists raise a substantial amount of money, an assumption fueled by rumors and speculation about white supremacist groups being funded by sources such as the Russian government, conservative foundations, or secretive wealthy backers. The reality is less sensational but still important. As American political and social movements go, the white supremacist movement is particularly poorly funded. Small in numbers and containing many adherents of little means, the white supremacist movement has a weak base for raising money compared to many other causes. Moreover, ostracized because of its extreme and hateful ideology, not to mention its connections to violence, the white supremacist movement does not have easy access to many common methods of raising and transmitting money. This lack of access to funds and funds transfers limits what white supremacists can do and achieve. However, the means by which the white supremacist movement does raise money are important to understand. Moreover, recent developments, particularly in crowdfunding, may have provided the white supremacist movement with more fundraising opportunities than it has seen in some time. This raises the disturbing possibility that some white supremacists may become better funded in the future than they have been in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center
    Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center before the Subcommittee on National Security, International Development and Monetary Policy Committee on Financial Services United States House of Representatives Dollars against Democracy: Domestic Terrorist Financing in the Aftermath of Insurrection February 25, 2021 My name is Lecia Brooks. I am chief of staff of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Now in our 50th year, the SPLC is a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people. SPLC lawyers have worked to shut down some of the nation’s most violent white supremacist groups by winning crushing, multimillion-dollar jury verdicts on behalf of their victims. We have helped dismantle vestiges of Jim Crow, reformed juvenile justice practices, shattered barriers to equality for women, children, the LGBTQ+ community, and the disabled, and worked to protect low-wage immigrant workers from exploitation. The SPLC began tracking white supremacist activity in the 1980s, during a resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan and other organized extremist hate groups. Today, the SPLC is the premier U.S. nonprofit organization monitoring the activities of domestic hate groups and other extremists. In the early 1990s, the SPLC launched its pioneering Teaching Tolerance program to provide educators with free, anti-bias classroom resources, such as classroom documentaries and lesson plans. Now renamed Learning For Justice, our program reaches millions of schoolchildren with award-winning curricula and other materials that promote understanding of our nation’s history and respect for others, helping educators create inclusive, equitable school environments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fringe Insurgency Connectivity, Convergence and Mainstreaming of the Extreme Right
    The Fringe Insurgency Connectivity, Convergence and Mainstreaming of the Extreme Right Jacob Davey Julia Ebner About this paper About the authors This report maps the ecosystem of the burgeoning Jacob Davey is a Researcher and Project Coordinator at ‘new’ extreme right across Europe and the US, which is the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), overseeing the characterised by its international outlook, technological development and delivery of a range of online counter- sophistication, and overtures to groups outside of the extremism initiatives. His research interests include the traditional recruitment pool for the extreme-right. This role of communications technologies in intercommunal movement is marked by its opportunistic pragmatism, conflict, the use of internet culture in information seeing movements which hold seemingly contradictory operations, and the extreme-right globally. He has ideologies share a bed for the sake of achieving provided commentary on the extreme right in a range common goals. It examines points of connectivity of media sources including The Guardian, The New York and collaboration between disparate groups and Times and the BBC. assesses the interplay between different extreme-right movements, key influencers and subcultures both Julia Ebner is a Research Fellow at the Institute for online and offline. Strategic Dialogue (ISD) and author of The Rage: The Vicious Circle of Islamist and Far-Right Extremism. Her research focuses on extreme right-wing mobilisation strategies, cumulative extremism and European terrorism prevention initiatives. She advises policy makers and tech industry leaders, regularly writes for The Guardian and The Independent and provides commentary on broadcast media, including the BBC and CNN. © ISD, 2017 London Washington DC Beirut Toronto This material is offered free of charge for personal and non-commercial use, provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecuting Domestic Terrorism
    Boston College Law Review Volume 61 Issue 1 Article 8 1-29-2020 Our Inner Demons: Prosecuting Domestic Terrorism Michael Molstad Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legislation Commons, and the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael Molstad, Our Inner Demons: Prosecuting Domestic Terrorism, 61 B.C.L. Rev. 339 (2020), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol61/iss1/8 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OUR INNER DEMONS: PROSECUTING DOMESTIC TERRORISM Abstract: The United States does not currently have a uniform framework for how it handles domestic terrorism. Although there is a terrorism section of the criminal code that criminalizes certain actions that are deemed terroristic, these laws are applied disproportionately to those with an Islamic ideology. Political motivations and protectionist interests within the United States tend to prevent similar crimes committed in the name of, for example, right-wing terrorism to be convicted under the terrorism section of the criminal code. In light of the threat posed by domestic terrorism and other trends in the political and cultural ethos, the current state of the law is inadequate to address the problem and unjustly places a stigma on one subsection of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Charlottesville Division
    08/12/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION DEANDRE HARRIS, § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. § ________________________3:19CV00046 JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER § VANGUARD AMERICA, ANDREW § ANGLIN MOONBASE HOLDINGS, LLC, § ROBERT “AZZMADOR” RAY, § NATHAN DAMIGO, ELLIOT KLINE § AKA ELI MOSLEY, IDENTITY EVROPA, § MATTHEW HEIMBACH, MATTHEW § PARROT AKA DAVID MATTHEW § PARROTT, TRADITIONALIST WORKERS § PARTY , MICHAEL HILL, MICHAEL § TUBBS, LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH, § JEFF SCHOEP, NATIONAL SOCIALIST § MOVEMENT, NATIONALIST FRONT, § AUGUSTUS SOL INVICTUS, § FRATERNAL § ORDER OF THE ALT-KNIGHTS, § MICHAEL “ENOCH” PEINOVICH, § LOYAL WHITE KNIGHTS OF THE § KU KLUX KLAN, § AND EAST COAST KNIGHTS OF THE § KU KLUX KLAN AKA EAST COAST § KNIGHTS OF THE TRUE INVISIBLE § EMPIRE, NATIONAL POLICY INSTITUTE, § THE PROUD BOYS, COUNCIL OF § CONSERVATIVE CITIZENS, AMERICAN § RENAISSANCE, THE RED ELEPHANTS, § AMERICAN FREEDOM KEEPERS, § ALTRIGHT.COM, § DANIEL P. BORDEN, § JURY TRIAL ALEX MICHAEL RAMOS, § JACOB SCOTT GOODWIN, § TYLER WATKINS DAVIS, § JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 § Defendants. § DeAndre Harris v. Jason Kessler, et al Page 1 of 25 Case 3:19-cv-00046-NKM Document 1 Filed 08/12/19 Page 1 of 25 Pageid#: 28 PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Plaintiff, DeAndre Harris, by his undersigned attorney alleges upon knowledge as to himself and his own actions and upon information and belief as to all the other matters, as follows: I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action brought by the Plaintiff against the Defendants for violation of Plaintiff’s individual rights to be free from assault and battery, and, consequently, in violation of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right
    Maik Fielitz, Nick Thurston (eds.) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right Political Science | Volume 71 Maik Fielitz, Nick Thurston (eds.) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US With kind support of Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Na- tionalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No- Derivatives 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non-commer- cial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ To create an adaptation, translation, or derivative of the original work and for com- mercial use, further permission is required and can be obtained by contacting [email protected] Creative Commons license terms for re-use do not apply to any content (such as graphs, figures, photos, excerpts, etc.) not original to the Open Access publication and further permission may be required from the rights holder. The obligation to research and clear permission lies solely with the party re-using the material. © 2019 transcript Verlag, Bielefeld Cover layout: Kordula Röckenhaus, Bielefeld Typeset by Alexander Masch, Bielefeld Printed by Majuskel Medienproduktion GmbH, Wetzlar Print-ISBN 978-3-8376-4670-2 PDF-ISBN 978-3-8394-4670-6 https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446706 Contents Introduction | 7 Stephen Albrecht, Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston ANALYZING Understanding the Alt-Right.
    [Show full text]
  • Carol Lynn Folt, Phd Chancellor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Carol Lynn Folt, PhD Chancellor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ADDRESS Office of the Chancellor 103 South Building, Campus Box 9100 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-9100 [email protected] t. 919-962-1365 PERSONAL Married: David R. Peart, Professor of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth Two children: Noah V. Peart (b. 1985) and Tessa S. Peart (b. 1987) EDUCATION University of California at Davis, PhD in Ecology 1982 University of California at Santa Barbara, MA in Biology 1978 University of California at Santa Barbara, BA in Aquatic Biology 1976 ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE Current 2013 Chancellor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Previous 2012 Interim President, Dartmouth 2010 Provost, Dartmouth 2010 Associate Director, Center for Children’s Environmental Health at Dartmouth 1997 Professor of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth 2009 Acting Provost, Dartmouth 2004 Dean of Faculty, Dartmouth 2001 Dean of Graduate Studies, Dartmouth 2001 Associate Dean of the Faculty for Interdisciplinary Programs 2000 Associate Director, Dartmouth Center for Environmental Health Sciences 1998 Associate Director, Dartmouth Toxic Metals Research Program 1991 Associate Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth 1984 Assistant Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth 1983 Research Instructor, Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth 1982 Postdoctoral Fellow at W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State 1981 Lecturer at University of California, Davis SELECTED HONORS, AWARDS & ELECTED OFFICES 2010 Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Biological Sciences 2010 Member Board of Trustees, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies 2008 Member of Board of Directors, Sherman Fairchild Foundation 2007 Endowed Professorship – The Dartmouth Professor of Biological Sciences 2002 Elected Officer American Society of Limnology & Oceanography Member-at-Large (3 year term) 1996 Member Board of Trustees, Montshire Museum of Science.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Carolina Botanical Garden at 50
    A Conservation Garden: The North Carolina Botanical Garden at 50 (1966-2016) Volume I Researched, compiled, and written by the North Carolina Botanical Garden Greenbriers February 2019 To the visionaries who came before us, the pragmatists who carried the vision forward, and the allies yet to come; and to past, present, and future seekers who find inspiration, encouragement, and solace at the North Carolina Botanical Garden. FOREWORD One would be hard pressed to walk into any botanical garden in the world and come across a compendium of historical information as complete as this one. What is even more amazing is that this compilation of the Garden’s 50-year history was authored by volunteers! Calling themselves the Greenbriers, this dedicated group of 12, under the able leadership of Joanne Lott, has spent countless hours researching, fact checking, and writing the definitive guide to the first 50 years of the North Carolina Botanical Garden. As you peruse Volume I from the Introduction to the Reference Timeline, perhaps even delve into the Volume II appendices, you will quickly come to the realization that this history goes much deeper than the last 50 years. Indeed, the story of the North Carolina Botanical Garden is the botanical legacy of the University of North Carolina, the nation’s oldest public university. Like the entangling Greenbrier vine, the two have been intertwined and inseparable since 1903 when the University’s first professor of botany, William Chambers Coker, established a teaching collection of trees and shrubs on campus which later became the Coker Arboretum. The Garden has many other branches that can trace their origin to the Coker legacy, including Battle Park, the UNC Herbarium, the Coker Pinetum, and The Rocks at the Coker/Burns estate.
    [Show full text]