DOCSLIB.ORG

Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against You

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against You Case 1:18-cv-02364-DKC Document 1 Filed 08/02/18 Page 1 of 134 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CITY OF COLUMBUS 90 W. Broad St. Columbus, OH 43215; MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE 100 N. Holliday St., Suite 101 Baltimore, MD 21202; CITY OF CINCINNATI City Hall, Room 214 801 Plum St. Cincinnati, OH 45202; CITY OF CHICAGO 121 N. Lasalle St., Room 600 Chicago, IL 60602 STEPHEN VONDRA c/o Democracy Forward Foundation 1333 H St. NW Washington, DC 20005; and BONNIE MORGAN c/o Democracy Forward Foundation 1333 H St. NW Washington, DC 20005; Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 18-cv-2364 DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20500; Case 1:18-cv-02364-DKC Document 1 Filed 08/02/18 Page 2 of 134 ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20201; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 200 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20201; SEEMA VERMA, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21244; and the CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES 7500 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21244, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Case 1:18-cv-02364-DKC Document 1 Filed 08/02/18 Page 3 of 134 TABLE OF CONTENTS NATURE OF THE ACTION ......................................................................................................... 4 JURISDICTION AND VENUE ..................................................................................................... 7 PARTIES ........................................................................................................................................ 7 FACTS ............................................................................................................................................ 9 I. The Individual Health Insurance Markets and the Affordable Care Act ................ 9 II. The Administration’s Intent to Repeal the ACA, With or Without Congress ...... 17 DEFENDANTS’ EXECUTIVE ACTIONS TO SABOTAGE THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT ........................................................................................................ 28 I. The 2019 Rule ....................................................................................................... 29 Eliminating Protections that the ACA Guarantees ................................... 29 1. Permitting Exchanges to Strip Individuals of Eligibility for Tax Credits Without Providing Direct Notification ...................... 29 2. Outsourcing to States the Compliance Review of Insurance Plans to be Offered on Federal Exchanges ................................... 32 3. Reducing Oversight of Insurance Brokers Participating in Direct Enrollment .......................................................................... 35 Deterring Americans from Enrolling in Quality Health Insurance Plans .......................................................................................................... 37 1. Making It Harder to Compare Insurance Plans............................. 37 2. Undermining the Navigator Program ............................................ 39 3. Making Small Business Exchanges Less User-Friendly .............. 42 4. Imposing Unnecessary Income Verification Requirements ......... 43 Driving Up Costs ...................................................................................... 46 1. Exacerbating Risk Selection ......................................................... 46 2. Curtailing Review of Insurance Rate Increases ............................ 49 3. Reducing Rebates for Poor Insurer Performance .......................... 52 II. Additional Executive Actions Demonstrating Defendants’ Violation of Their Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the ACA ................................... 55 Directing Agencies to Sabotage the Act ................................................... 55 Attempting to Destabilize the Exchanges ................................................. 57 1. Promoting Bare-Bones Plans to Try to Weaken ACA Exchanges ............................................................................ 61 2. Undermining the Individual Mandate ........................................... 65 Case 1:18-cv-02364-DKC Document 1 Filed 08/02/18 Page 4 of 134 3. Refusing to Grant State Waiver Requests that Would Further the ACA’s Goals .............................................................. 68 4. Attempting to Weaken Public Confidence in ACA Exchanges .... 70 Working to Decrease Enrollment .............................................................. 73 1. Shortening Open Enrollment ........................................................ 74 2. Cutting Funding for Advertising and Refusing to Publicize Open Enrollment ........................................................... 77 3. Cutting Funding for Navigators and Encouraging Them to Undermine the Act ........................................................................ 82 4. Refusing to Participate in Enrollment Events and Other Outreach .............................................................................. 88 Refusing to Defend the Act....................................................................... 89 DEFENDANTS’ UNLAWFUL ACTIONS ARE HARMING PLAINTIFFS ............................. 91 I. Defendants’ Unlawful Actions Are Causing Premiums to Rise and the Rate of the Uninsured to Increase ............................................................ 91 II. Defendants’ Unlawful Actions Harm the City Plaintiffs by Forcing Them to Spend More on Uncompensated Care ....................................... 96 Columbus, Ohio ...................................................................................... 102 Baltimore, Maryland ............................................................................... 106 Cincinnati, Ohio ...................................................................................... 111 Chicago, Illinois ...................................................................................... 114 III. Defendants’ Unlawful Actions Harm the Individual Plaintiffs by Making Insurance Coverage Harder and More Expensive to Procure ............................. 118 CLAIMS FOR RELIEF .............................................................................................................. 124 Count One (Violation of the Administrative Procedure Act) ......................................... 124 Count Two (Violation of the Take Care Clause) ............................................................ 126 PRAYER FOR RELIEF ............................................................................................................. 126 ii Case 1:18-cv-02364-DKC Document 1 Filed 08/02/18 Page 5 of 134 Plaintiffs the City of Columbus, Ohio, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Maryland, the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, the City of Chicago, Illinois, Stephen Vondra, and Bonnie Morgan hereby sue Defendants Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Seema Verma, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and allege as follows: 1. Having failed to persuade Congress to repeal the Affordable Care Act, President Trump and his Administration are waging a relentless campaign to sabotage and, ultimately, to nullify the law. President Trump has repeatedly admitted as much: because Congress rejected his demand to have “Obamacare repealed,” he has said, he decided “to go a different route” and “end[] Obamacare” through his own actions. To that end, President Trump and his Administration are deliberately trying to make the Act fail. They are discouraging Americans from enrolling in comprehensive plans that protect them against debilitating medical expenses. They are working to raise prices and reduce choices for Americans seeking insurance in the Act’s exchanges. And they are misappropriating funds Congress allocated to support the Act, instead using those funds to attack it. The Trump Administration’s strategy: to deceptively shift the blame from their own actions to the Act itself. Their objective: to pressure Congress to repeal the Act or, if that fails, to achieve de facto repeal through executive action alone. The Administration’s actions are unlawful. 2. The scope of this Complaint is testament to the breadth and persistence of the Trump Administration’s efforts to undermine the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). As Plaintiffs— Case 1:18-cv-02364-DKC Document 1 Filed 08/02/18 Page 6 of 134 individuals and cities representing almost 4.5 million Americans—allege in detail below, the Administration has tried to prevent families from obtaining health insurance through the ACA’s exchanges by, for example: promoting insurance that does not comply with the ACA’s requirements, including insurance that does not cover preexisting conditions; slashing funding for outreach strategies that have been proven to encourage individuals, and healthy individuals in particular, to sign up for coverage; misusing federal funds for advertising campaigns aimed at smearing the ACA and its exchanges,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy
    JOE RIIS JOE Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy By Matt Lee-Ashley April 2014 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy By Matt Lee-Ashley April 2014 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 Oil and gas industry investments in three major sportsmen groups 5 Safari Club International 9 The National Rifle Association 11 Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation 13 Impact of influence: How the oil and gas industry’s investments are paying off 14 Threats to endangered and threatened wildlife in oil- and gas-producing regions 19 Threats to the backcountry 22 Threats to public access and ownership 25 Conclusion 27 About the author and acknowledgments 28 Endnotes Introduction and summary Two bedrock principles have guided the work and advocacy of American sports- men for more than a century. First, under the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, wildlife in the United States is considered a public good to be conserved for everyone and accessible to everyone, not a commodity that can be bought and owned by the highest bidder.1 Second, since President Theodore Roosevelt’s creation of the first wildlife refuges and national forests, sportsmen have fought to protect wildlife habitat from development and fragmentation to ensure healthy game supplies. These two principles, however, are coming under growing fire from an aggressive and coordinated campaign funded by the oil and gas industry. As part of a major effort since 2008 to bolster its lobbying and political power, the oil and gas industry has steadily expanded its contributions and influ- ence over several major conservative sportsmen’s organizations, including Safari Club International, or SCI, the National Rifle Association, or NRA, and the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Thousand Commandments Executive Summary
    Ten Thousand Commandments An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State 2020 Edition by Clyde Wayne Crews, Jr. Executive Summary Spending control and deficit restraint are in- ing above $5 trillion by FY 2022, and nearly dispensable to a nation’s stability and long- $7.5 trillion by 2030.5 The national debt term economic health. Yet alarm over lack of now stands at $23.2 trillion, up more than spending restraint under President Donald $2 trillion since 2018.6 Trump’s administration, even with the ben - efit of a healthy economy, has not stemmed As imposing as that is, the cost of govern- disbursements.1 Without significant changes, ment extends even beyond what Washington more will soon be spent on debt service than collects in taxes and the far greater amount on the entire defense budget, especially as in- it spends. Federal environmental, safety and terest rates rise.2 Meanwhile, magical think- health, and economic regulations and inter- ing that government outlays create wealth is ventions affect the economy by hundreds of now fashionable among emboldened progres- billions—even trillions—of dollars annu- sives who advocate Medicare for All, a Green ally. These regulatory burdens can operate New Deal, and a guaranteed national income, as a hidden tax.7 Unlike on-budget spend- while supposed fiscal conservatives have lost ing, regulatory costs caused by government the appetite for addressing spending.3 are largely obscured from public view. As the least disciplined aspect of government In March 2019, the White House budget activity, regulation can be appealing to law- proposal requested $4.746 trillion in outlays makers.
    [Show full text]
  • HARD, SOFT and DARK MONEY Introduction Early Political Scandals
    HARD, SOFT AND DARK MONEY Introduction Early political scandals involved money used for bribery or buying votes. Modern day scandals involve the appearances of corruption depending where gifts and campaign money came from. The U.S. Supreme Court has made a number of controversial decisions expanding the amounts of money in politics by characterizing political donations and expenditures to be exercises of freedom of speech. Among other results, those decisions have created a large and growing category of election related donations and contributions called “dark money.” Important Terms Defined Terms relating to money in politics that are used in this paper have definitions more exactly set out by law. These terms are fully addressed in the MIP paper Definitions for Money in Politics, Disclosure Requirements for PACs The relationships of PACs to their disclosure requirements are shown in the chart below. May Funding Disclosure Donations coordinate Corporations Sources required limited with can donate candidate Political parties PAC’s Super Pac’s 527’s 501(c)’s Dark Money Twenty-nine types of corporations are listed in §501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as qualified for nonprofit status. Social Welfare Organizations under §501(c) (4), Labor Unions under §501(c)(5), and Trade Associations under §501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code are not required to report from whom they get their donations. Hence these donations are referred to as dark money. Since social welfare or business interests often intersect with political issues, these groups are allowed to use funds to influence elections, but there is otherwise no dollar limit on how much that can be, and they only need to report the majority of their expenditures in general terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 Complaint of ) ) Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause, and ) Sunlight Foundation ) ) Against ) ) Hearst Properties, Inc., licensee of WISN-TV, ) Milwaukee, Wisconsin ) ) For Violations of the Communications Act ) §317 and FCC Rule 47 CFR §73.1212 ) To: Media Bureau COMPLAINT The Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause, and Sunlight Foundation1 file this complaint regarding violations of the Communications Act and the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) regulations by Hearst Properties, Inc., licensee of WISN-TV. WISN-TV is an ABC broadcast television station in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. In November 2015, WISN-TV aired political advertisements identified as paid for by Independence USA PAC (“Independence”). Despite the fact that even a cursory search of the public record would have shown that Michael Bloomberg is the sole funder of Independence USA PAC, WISN-TV did not identify Michael Bloomberg as the sponsor of the advertisements or, evidently, make inquiry of Independence USA of its sources of funding, and instead identified the sponsor of the ads as “Independence USA PAC.” On November 19, 2015, while the advertisements were still running on WISN-TV, Complainants provided evidence directly to WISN-TV establishing that Independence USA PAC 1 Descriptions of these organizations can be found in Exhibit A. was not the ad’s true sponsor.2 Specifically, Complainants provided evidence that Michael Bloomberg has provided 100 per cent of Independence’s funding since its creation.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGETOWN LAW INSTITUTE for PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Directors 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 312 Hope M
    GEORGETOWN LAW INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Directors 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 312 Hope M. Babcock Washington, DC 20001-2075 Angela J. Campbell Telephone: 202-662-9535 Michael T. Kirkpatrick Fax: 202-662-9634 Benton Senior Counselor Andrew Jay Schwartzman Staff Attorneys Meghan M. Boone Justin Gundlach Daniel H. Lutz* Aaron Mackey July 6, 2015 Cathy Williams Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 via email to [email protected] and [email protected] RE:` Information Collection regarding Local Public Inspection Files and Political Files OMB Control Number 3060-0215 Dear Ms. Williams, The Campaign Legal Center, Sunlight Foundation, and Common Cause (“CLC et al.”) are writing to strongly support the continued collection of information under FCC Rules 47 CFR §§ 73.3526 and 73.3527 (local public inspection files) and §76.1701 and §73 1943 (political files). They also offer some suggestions to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected. The information in the public inspection file is necessary for the Commission to carry out its public interest responsibilities The Notice correctly states that the public and FCC use public file information to evaluate licensee performance, ensure that broadcast stations address issues of concern to their communities of license, and ensure that stations comply with Commission policies concerning licensee control. 80 Fed. Reg. 26048 (May 6, 2015). To serve these functions, it is essential that the public have access to the information in the public files. Requiring television stations to make their public inspection files available online has greatly improved public access.
    [Show full text]
  • Delegate Research Information
    MSC 65th Student Conference on National Affairs Texas A&M University Delegate Research Information Round Table Modern Monopolies: The Influence of Mega-Corporations Facilitator: Casey Fleming ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This delegate research information is not intended to be a comprehensive assessment of your assigned round table topic, but rather a starting point to help launch your own personal investigations into the various associated issues. It is encouraged, if not expected, that your policy proposals will be inclusive of aspects pertaining to your round table topic that are not covered in this research compilation. You, your facilitator, your round table host, and your fellow roundtable delegates are all responsible for crafting a policy proposal that takes this into consideration. Terms & Actors Terms Bureaucracy - agencies made by the federal government to help enforce laws made. Most direct source of corruption from corporations. Citizens United vs. Federal Election Committee- landmark Case settled in 2010 by the Supreme Court that overturned certain long-standing restrictions on political fundraising and spending. Federal Campaign Act - passed in 1971, this law is the primary source of regulation concerning political fundraising and spending. Later amendments would go on to establish the Federal Election Committee (FEC). Lobbying- communicating with a public official for the purpose of influencing the passage, defeat, amendment, or postponement of legislative or executive action. Megacorporation- a large collection of companies owned by a single parent company. Shadowban - when an individual(s)’ content isn’t shown to the public despite not being officially “banned” by the network. Actors “Big Oil” - the supermajors are considered to be BP, Chevron Corporation, ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Total and Eni (and sometimes ConocoPhillips).
    [Show full text]
  • May 20, 2020 COVID-19: Federal Government Response
    May 20, 2020 COVID-19: Federal Government Response May 12: H.R. 6800, the Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions (HEROES) Act, was introduced in the United States House of Representatives. This is the fifth legislative bill to be introduced to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. The bill includes additional funds for state and local governments to pay essential workers during the coronavirus pandemic. It also includes provisions for additional stimulus payments to Americans, more funding for vaccines and treatments, and health coverage for people that have been left unemployed and without health insurance. A number of the provisions included are consistent with Academy- driven policy recommendations during COVID-19 such as: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention $2.1 billion to support federal, state, and local public health agencies to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus, including: $2 billion for State, Local, Territorial, and Tribal Public Health Departments $130 million for public health data surveillance and analytics infrastructure modernization Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicaid: Increases Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) payments to state Medicaid programs by a total of 14 percentage points starting July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 National Institutes of Health (NIH) $4.745 billion to expand COVID-19-related research on the NIH campus and at academic institutions across the country and to support the shutdown and startup costs of biomedical research laboratories nationwide
    [Show full text]
  • Box 1. Prominent Executive Actions on Regulatory Process Reform During Trump’S Term
    Box 1. Prominent Executive Actions on Regulatory Process Reform during Trump’s Term 2017 2019 • Presidential Memorandum, Streamlining Permitting and • Executive Order 13855, Promoting Active Management of Reducing Regulatory Burdens for Domestic Manufacturing, America’s Forests, Rangelands, and Other Federal Lands to January 24, 2017.19 Improve Conditions and Reduce Wildfire Risk, December • Executive Order 13766, Expediting Environmental Reviews 21, 2018.38 and Approvals for High Priority Infrastructure Projects, • Executive Order 13891, Promoting the Rule of Law January 24, 2017.20 through Improved Agency Guidance Documents, October • Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and Control- 9, 2019.39 ling Regulatory Costs, January 30, 2017.21 • Executive Order 13892, Promoting the Rule of Law • Executive Order 13772, Core Principles for Regulating the through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative United States Financial System, February 8, 2017.22 Enforcement and Adjudication, October 9, 2019.40 • Executive Order 13777, Enforcing the Regulatory Reform • Executive Order 13879, Advancing American Kidney Agenda, February 24, 2017.23 Health, July 10, 2019.41 • Executive Order 13781, Comprehensive Plan for • Executive Order 13878, Establishing a White House Reorganizing the Executive Branch, March 13, 2017.24 Council on Eliminating Regulatory Barriers to Affordable • Executive Order 13789, Identifying and Reducing Tax Housing, June 25, 2019.42 Regulatory Burdens, April 21, 2017.25 • Executive Order 13874, Modernizing the Regulatory
    [Show full text]
  • Voting Margaret E
    Voting Margaret E. Heggan Free Public Library You can find books to check out using the following call number range: 324.62 – 324.973 923.2 – 923.8 973.0496 - 973.8 Search the library’s catalog using the following subjects: African Americans--Suffrage Voting Voting Rights Act of 1965. United States Women--Suffrage 1. Go to www.hegganlibrary.org 2. Click Advanced Search. 3. Click the arrow next to words or phrase and select subject. 4. Type in one of the subjects listed above and click Search. The following books are a selection of the larger collection. Ask the librarian for help finding additional books. Voting –Juvenile Voting / Sarah De Capua. Women’s Suffrage / Brenda Stalcup. J 324.63 DEC YA 305.42 WOM Biography Elizabeth Cady Stanton / Lori D. Ginzberg. Susan B. Anthony, a crusader for women's rights / B STANTON, ELIZABETH CADY Barbara Salsini. B ANTHONY, SUSAN B. Voting Rights Act of 1965 Bending toward justice: the Voting Rights Act and Judgment days: Lyndon Baines Johnson, Martin the transformation of American democracy / Gary Luther King, Jr., and the laws that changed May. America / Nick Kotz. 973.0496 MAY 973.923 KOT Reference - Reference books (REF) cannot be checked out. International encyclopedia of women's suffrage. Guide to political campaigns in America. REF 324.623 HAN REF 324.973 GUI Databases The online databases are an excellent resource that can be used in the library or from home. Ask the reference librarian for assistance. Websites New Jersey Voter Information NJ Division of Elections NJ Voter Information Page http://www.njelections.org/ https://voter.njsvrs.com/PublicAccess/jsp/Home.jsp National Voter Information Can I Vote http://www.canivote.org/ Can I Vote was created by the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS).
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., 2021 Executive Order 14009
    Administration of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., 2021 Executive Order 14009—Strengthening Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act January 28, 2021 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. In the 10 years since its enactment, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has reduced the number of uninsured Americans by more than 20 million, extended critical consumer protections to more than 100 million people, and strengthened and improved the Nation's healthcare system. At the same time, millions of people who are potentially eligible for coverage under the ACA or other laws remain uninsured, and obtaining insurance benefits is more difficult than necessary. For these reasons, it is the policy of my Administration to protect and strengthen Medicaid and the ACA and to make high-quality healthcare accessible and affordable for every American. Sec. 2. Special Enrollment Period. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic has triggered a historic public health and economic crisis. In January of 2020, as the COVID–19 pandemic was spreading, the Secretary of Health and Human Services declared a public health emergency. In March of 2020, the President declared a national emergency. Although almost a year has passed, the emergency continues—over 5 million Americans have contracted the disease in January 2021, and thousands are dying every week. Over 30 million Americans remain uninsured, preventing many from obtaining necessary health services and treatment. Black, Latino, and Native American persons are more likely to be uninsured, and communities of color have been especially hard hit by both the COVID–19 pandemic and the economic downturn.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving State Government Digital Information Minnesota Historical Society
    Preserving State Government Digital Information Minnesota Historical Society Sunlight Foundation’s NDIIPP projects Summary The following report was written by the Sunlight Foundation to describe their involvement with the NDIIPP project. Sunlight developed a OpenGovernment page using Minnesota data as well as a mobile application using OpenState data; both of these show how accessible government information can be used by outside parties. Any comments, corrections, or recommendations may be sent to the project team, care of: Carol Kussmann Collections Assistant, State Archives Minnesota Historical Society [email protected] / 651.259.3262 Summary During the past year Sunlight Foundation has created two products serving the purpose of increasing public access to state legislative data: the Open Government website (OpenGovernment.org) and the Open States iOS app (to be publicly released Q1 2012). Both of these sites are powered by the Open States API, a data service that provides a common interface to state legislative data including bills, legislators, roll call votes, and committees. OpenGovernment.org OpenGovernment.org is the name given to the public-facing website built around Sunlight’s Open States data. The site presents a common, easy to use interface to state legislative information with additional context pulled from news aggregation services, social media, and partner organizations such as Project Vote Smart for legislator contact information and National Institute on Money in State Politics for campaign finance. When a user visits a state page (such as http://mn.opengovernment.org) they are presented with an overview of data for that state, including popular bills, legislators, and issues (determined by online mentions).
    [Show full text]
  • WDIV-AFP.Pdf
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 Complaint of ) ) Campaign Legal Center and Sunlight ) Foundation ) ) Against ) ) Post-Newsweek Stations, Inc., licensee of ) WDIV-TV, Detroit, MI ) ) For Violations of the Communications Act ) § 315 and FCC Regulation § 73.1212 ) To: Enforcement Bureau COMPLAINT The Campaign Legal Center and the Sunlight Foundation file this complaint regarding violations of the Communications Act and the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) regulations by Post-Newsweek Stations, Inc., licensee of WDIV-TV. In January 2014, WDIV- TV ran a political ad sponsored by Americans for Prosperity (“AFP”). The station failed to disclose in its online political file information about AFP and the ad as required by the Communications Act and the FCC’s regulations. I. Facts A. Parties The Campaign Legal Center is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that promotes awareness and enforcement of political broadcasting laws. The Campaign Legal Center’s mission is to represent the public interest in the enforcement of media and campaign laws. Through public education, advocacy for federal rulemaking proceedings, and congressional 1 action, the Campaign Legal Center seeks to shape political broadcasting policies and promote effective enforcement of the public interest obligations of the media.1 The Sunlight Foundation is a nonpartisan nonprofit that advocates for open government globally and uses technology to make government more accountable to all. Sunlight accomplishes these goals at municipal, federal,
    [Show full text]