1/4 ページ BBC NEWS | Programmes | File on 4 | How Cancer Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1/4 ページ BBC NEWS | Programmes | File on 4 | How Cancer Studies BBC NEWS | Programmes | File on 4 | How cancer studies wasted cash 1/4 ページ Home News Sport Radio TV Weather Languages nmlkji UK version nmlkj International version | About the versions Low graphics | Accessibility help News services Your news when you want BBC News 24 it News Front Page Last Updated: Tuesday, 20 November 2007, 16:30 GMT E-mail this to a friend Printable version How cancer studies wasted cash By Gerry Northam File On 4 Africa Expensive and time- Americas consuming work in Home Asia-Pacific laboratories around the ABOUT THE PROGRAMME Europe world has rendered many Listen Again Middle East cancers treatable, bringing Transcripts South Asia added years, even decades, Coming Up UK for countless patients and Reporter profiles Business their families. INTERACT Health File on 4 SMS alerts Science/Nature So it comes as a shock to learn Cell-line mistakes have made Contact Us Technology that millions of pounds in thousands of cancer studies invalid Questions & Answers Entertainment charitable donations and from taxpayers are being wasted on Also in the news "worthless" research for lack of good housekeeping practice SEARCH FILE ON 4: ----------------- in the lab. Video and Audio ----------------- BBC File On 4 has discovered that many scientists fail to PODCAST Have Your Say carry out simple and inexpensive checks to ensure that they Download or subscribe to this In Pictures are working with the right experimental materials - particular programme's podcast Country Profiles forms of human cancer cells. Special Reports As a result, thousands of studies are invalid. RELATED BBC SITES SPORT The experience of Dr Chris Tselepis at the Cancer Research SEE ALSO WEATHER UK laboratories in Birmingham University, highlights the Cancer studies 'wasted millions' ON THIS DAY problem. 20 Nov 07 | File on 4 EDITORS' BLOG RELATED INTERNET LINKS For more than 20 years, researchers in many countries have Cancer Research UK used a particular experimental culture of cancer cells known Medical Research Council as TE7 to study one type of oesophageal cancer. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites This 'cell-line' has been sold worldwide and formed the basis MOST POPULAR STORIES NOW of hundreds of published studies. MOST E-MAILED MOST READ Olmert warns of 'end of Israel' But Dr Tselepis and an It is an incredible Manila coup bid ends in surrender international group of frustration because brain Hackers hijack web search colleagues discovered that TE7 tumour research is extremely results poorly funded and its hard- is the wrong type of cancer, UK teacher goes to court in fought money and when we and the implications for two Sudan get money into the laboratory decades of study are grave. we need to produce good Morrissey insists on NME apology strong results, good strong Most popular now, in detail "If there's a study which is data and we need to report claiming that a particular drug back to those organisations which are mainly charities has a particular effect on a cell who are funding our research. type and potentially you could use this drug for the Prof Geoff Pilkington, University of treatment of patients that Portsmouth clearly is going to be misfounded," he explained. The result is a waste of time and money. But how can this happen? The problem of misidentification of cell-lines arises because to the naked eye they look similar - a cluster of tiny dots on the bottom of a laboratory flask. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/file_on_4/7104070.stm 2007/11/29 BBC NEWS | Programmes | File on 4 | How cancer studies wasted cash 2/4 ページ Even under a powerful microscope, it can be hard to tell one cancer cell from another. Professor Geoff Pilkington, of the University of Portsmouth learned this the hard way , "There are two incidences that I'm aware of in the laboratories whereby we've had what we call squeaky contaminants and these are whereby our human cell lines, where those have become contaminated with either rat or mouse cell lines." It meant the whole research into brain tumours had to be binned and started again. "It is an incredible frustration because brain tumour research is extremely poorly funded and its hard-fought money and when we get money into the laboratory we need to produce good strong results, good strong data and we need to report back to those organisations which are mainly Some academics have called for tough charities who are funding our action to authenticate cell-lines research." The problems created by contaminated or misidentified cell- lines have a wider impact as studies based on the wrong materials regularly find their way into scientific journals and become part of the accepted literature - muddying the foundation for further research. This danger troubles one of Britain's leading experts, Karol Sikora Professor of Cancer Medicine at Imperial College London. Although he is quick to point out that no patient is likely to be directly harmed by such invalid lab work. 'Sloppy science' "One of the problems of course is that investigators are competitive, eager to get the results. They don't want to waste their time doing what they regard as a technical exercise, typing the cell lines. They believe someone else should do it for them. And that's led to this sloppiness, I guess, in science." And even after a false cell-line has been unmasked, scientists carry on using it as if it were the real thing while other studies are utterly invalidated by the error. Professor Gertrude Buehring, found a third of studies involving a false cell-line in publications from 1969 to 2004 used it in an invalid way as if it were the cell type of origin and obviously having no idea it was a contaminant. The expert on leukaemia and breast cancer at the University of California in Berkeley, was one of 19 eminent specialists from Britain and America who wrote this summer to the United States Health Secretary calling for tough action to eliminate such "worthless" research. The Director of the Federal Research Agency National Institutes of Health responded: "There appears to be abundant evidence that contaminated or misidentified cultures have compromised the validity of many studies and publications." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/file_on_4/7104070.stm 2007/11/29 BBC NEWS | Programmes | File on 4 | How cancer studies wasted cash 3/4 ページ But the response from We would expect labs to scientists was lukewarm authenticate their work or use according to the originator of properly-sourced cells. the Open Letter, Professor Roland Nardone of the Dr Rob Buckle, Medical Research Catholic University of America. Council "They morphed into ostriches, is the best explanation I have." He now advocates zero tolerance with respect to advocating "no authentication, no grant; no authentication, no publication in a good scientific journal. " We wanted to ask the editors of leading UK journals and funding bodies their response to the no authentication, no publication policy. No-one from the leading British journal 'Nature' was available for interview. Nor was the editor of the British Journal of Cancer. The journal's parent body, Cancer Research UK, did not put up anyone for interview but in a statement stressed it carried out stringent checks on its own bank of cell-lines, including a DNA authenticating service. And there was a cautious response from the leading source of public funding, the Medical Research Council, which spends £500m of public money a year - more than £70m of it on cancer research. Cell authentication The MRC's Dr Rob Buckle said: "We would expect labs to authenticate their work or use properly-sourced cells." It may seem unbelievable to those outside the scientific establishment that there should be a problem of using false research samples especially when a relatively cheap authentication process is now available. But even within the establishment, voices are now calling for science to put its house in order, joined by Prof Sikora. "I think we as a scientific community have to do something about it. Just no grant or no publication, but no publication is probably more powerful. If one of the leading journals, which all of us want to publish in, said 'okay, you have used cell lines, wonderful, just give us the certificate of authenticity.' Now we can tell all that and it doesn't necessarily cost a lot of money." You hear the full story on File On 4, Tuesday 20 November 2007, 2000 GMT, repeated Sunday 25 November 2007, 1700 GMT. E-mail this to a friend Printable version Bookmark with: What are these? Delicious Digg reddit Facebook StumbleUpon FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS Fantastical feast Verbal blows 'St Petersburg clan' Golden Compass stars Republican presidential Russia's former capital talk about the eagerly- hopefuls turn on each is now a launch-pad to awaited film other as race heats up the Kremlin's top jobs http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/file_on_4/7104070.stm 2007/11/29 BBC NEWS | Programmes | File on 4 | How cancer studies wasted cash 4/4 ページ PRODUCTS & SERVICES E-mail news Mobiles Alerts News feeds Podcasts MMVII Most Popular Now | The most read story in Australasia is: Olmert warns of 'end of Israel' Back to top ^^ Help Privacy and cookies policy News sources About the BBC Contact us http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/file_on_4/7104070.stm 2007/11/29.
Recommended publications
  • Commissioning Brief 2020 FACTUAL (Including Arts) Proposals for Specific Ideas
    RADIO COMMISSIONING FRAMEWORK Commissioning Brief 2020 FACTUAL (including arts) Proposals for specific ideas Production of factual programmes Commissions mainly for broadcast from April 2021 to March 2022 Proteus 2021-2022 Round 1 Version 1 18.06.2020 LL 1 of 36 CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................. 1 SECTION A: ABOUT RADIO 4 ............................................................................................. 3 SECTION B: TIMETABLE ........................................................................................................ 4 SECTION C: THE COMMISSIONING PROCESS ..................................................... 5 STAGE 1: SHORT PROPOSAL ....................................................................................... 5 STAGE 2: FULL PROPOSAL .......................................................................................... 7 STAGE 3: CONDITIONAL COMMISSION ..................................................................... 9 SECTION D: EDITORIAL OPPORTUNITIES ................................................................ 11 Version 1 18.06.2020 LL 2 of 36 SECTION A: ABOUT RADIO 4 Radio 4 Radio 4 is unique in the breadth and quality of its informative, educational and entertaining programming. Every day, on air and online, Radio 4 has more original content than any other broadcaster in the world. Its authoritative news and current affairs journalism is complemented by programmes exploring
    [Show full text]
  • Saturday, July 7, 2018 | 15 | WATCH Monday, July 9
    6$785'$<-8/< 7+,6,6123,&1,& _ )22' ,16,'( 7+,6 :((. 6+233,1* :,1(6 1$',<$ %5($.6 &KHFNRXW WKH EHVW LQ ERWWOH 683(50$5.(7 %(67 %8<6 *UDE WKH ODWHVW GHDOV 75,(' $1' 7(67(' $// 7+( 58/(6 :H FKHFN RXW WRS WUDYHO 1$',<$ +XVVDLQ LV D KDLUGU\HUV WR ORRN ZDQWDQGWKDW©VZK\,IHHOVR \RXGRQ©WHDWZKDW\RX©UHJLYHQ WRWDO UXOHEUHDNHU OXFN\§ WKHQ \RX JR WR EHG KXQJU\§ JRRG RQ WKH PRYH WKHVH GD\V ¦,©P D 6KH©V ZRQ 7KLV UHFLSH FROOHFWLRQ DOVR VHHV /XFNLO\ VKH DQG KXVEDQG $EGDO SDUW RI WZR YHU\ %DNH 2II SXW KHU IOLS D EDNHG FKHHVHFDNH KDYH PDQDJHG WR SURGXFH RXW D VOHZ RI XSVLGH GRZQ PDNH D VLQJOH FKLOGUHQ WKDW DUHQ©W IXVV\HDWHUV GLIIHUHQW ZRUOGV ¤ ,©P %ULWLVK HFODLU LQWR D FRORVVDO FDNH\UROO VR PXFK VR WKDW WKH ZHHN EHIRUH 5(/$; DQG ,©P %DQJODGHVKL§ WKH FRRNERRNV DQG LV DOZD\V LQYHQW D ILVK ILQJHU ODVDJQH ZH FKDW VKH KDG DOO WKUHH *$0(6 $336 \HDUROG H[SODLQV ¦DQG UHDOO\ VZDS WKH SUDZQ LQ EHJJLQJ KHU WR GROH RXW IUDJUDQW &RQMXUH XS RQ WKH WHOO\ ¤ SUDZQ WRDVW IRU FKLFNHQ DQG ERZOIXOV RI ILVK KHDG FXUU\ EHFDXVH ,©P SDUW RI WKHVH 1DGL\D +XVVDLQ PDJLFDO DWPRVSKHUH WZR DPD]LQJ ZRUOGV , KDYH ¦VSLNH§ D GLVK RI PDFDURQL ¦7KH\ ZHUH DOO RYHU LW OLNH WHOOV (//$ FKHHVH ZLWK SLFFDOLOOL ¤ WKH ¨0XPP\ 3OHDVH FDQ ZH KDYH 086,& QR UXOHV DQG QR UHVWULFWLRQV§ :$/.(5 WKDW 5(/($6(6 ZRPDQ©V D PDYHULFN WKDW ULJKW QRZ"© , ZDV OLNH ¨1R +HQFH ZK\ WKUHH \HDUV RQ IURP IRRG LV PHDQW +RZHYHU KHU DSSURDFK WR WKDW©V WRPRUURZ©V GLQQHU ,©YH :H OLVWHQ WR WKH ZLQQLQJ *UHDW %ULWLVK %DNH 2II WR EH IXQ FODVKLQJDQG PL[LQJ IODYRXUVDQG MXVW FRRNHG LW HDUO\ \RX©YH JRW ODWHVW DOEXPV WKH /XWRQERUQ
    [Show full text]
  • “File on 4” – “Unmasked: Stories from the Ppe Frontline”
    BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION RADIO 4 TRANSCRIPT OF “FILE ON 4” – “UNMASKED: STORIES FROM THE PPE FRONTLINE” CURRENT AFFAIRS GROUP TRANSMISSION: Tuesday 9th February 2021 2000 - 2040 REPEAT: Sunday 14th February 2021 1700 - 1740 REPORTER: Phil Kemp PRODUCER: Anna Meisel EDITOR: Gail Champion PROGRAMME NUMBER: 20VQ6342LH0 - 1 - THE ATTACHED TRANSCRIPT WAS TYPED FROM A RECORDING AND NOT COPIED FROM AN ORIGINAL SCRIPT. BECAUSE OF THE RISK OF MISHEARING AND THE DIFFICULTY IN SOME CASES OF IDENTIFYING INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS, THE BBC CANNOT VOUCH FOR ITS COMPLETE ACCURACY. “FILE ON 4” Transmission: Tuesday 9th February 2021 Repeat: Sunday 14th February 2021 Producer: Anna Meisel Reporter: Phil Kemp Editor: Gail Champion ACTUALITY OF BEEPING HOSSAIN: I’m just getting up for my night shifts that I’ve had to pick up because two of our colleagues have come down with Covid and so now there is a rota gap. KEMP: This is not the first year in the NHS that Dr Pushpo Babul Hossain was expecting. HOSSAIN: That means staying up all night, looking after sick patients and wearing PPE for most of the time. So, I shall take you with me on my PPE journey today. KEMP: It’s late January and she’s working as a junior doctor in a South London hospital, on the Covid wards. As we join her on the night shift, we’re going to hear how vitally important the masks, gowns and gloves the NHS provides are for keeping her safe. Some of this equipment ran dangerously short in the early months of the pandemic. In response, the Government belatedly - and at the top of the market - splurged hundreds of millions on kit that’s not fit for purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Abuse As a Sentinel for Human Violence: a Critique ∗ Emily G
    Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2009, pp. 589--614 Animal Abuse as a Sentinel for Human Violence: A Critique ∗ Emily G. Patterson-Kane American Veterinary Medical Association Heather Piper Manchester Metropolitan University It has been suggested that acts of violence against human and nonhuman an- imals share commonalities, and that animal abuse is a sentinel for current or future violence toward people. The popular and professional acceptance of strong connections between types of violence is beginning to be used to justify social work interventions and to influence legal decision making, and so requires greater scrutiny. Examination of the limited pool of empirical data suggests that animal abuse is relatively common among men, with violent offenders having an increased probability of reporting prior animal abuse—with the majority of violent offend- ers not reporting any animal abuse. Causal explanations for “the link,” such as empathy impairment or conduct disorder, suffer from a lack of validating research and, based on research into interhuman violence, the assumption that violence has a predominant, single underlying cause must be questioned. An (over)emphasis on the danger that animal abusers pose to humans serves to assist in achieving a consensus that animal abuse is a serious issue, but potentially at the cost of failing to focus on the most common types of abuse, and the most effective strategies for reducing its occurrence. Nothing in this review and discussion should be taken as minimizing the importance of animals as frequent victims of violence, or the co-occurrence of abuse types in “at-risk” households.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Ethics Report
    ........................................................................ Professional Ethics Report Publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Scientific Freedom, Responsibility & Law Program in collaboration with the Committee on Scientific Freedom & Responsibility, Professional Society Ethics Group VOLUME XIX NUMBER 2 Spring 2006 s ADVISING AND INFLUENCING legislative process? My own research successful at grasping unfamiliar SCIENCE POLICY IN THE UK AND investigates these questions by comparing scientific concepts (4). While increasing THE US the mechanisms of government particularly the number of qualified scientists in as they relate to areas of science policy elected government would undoubtedly By Richard Elliott upon which these two nations have failed assist the accurate communication of to agree (e.g. stem cell research, climate science, in theory, there is no reason Richard Elliott, a former intern with the change, and genetically modified agricul- why the advice of a third party (provided AAAS Scientific Freedom, Responsibility ture). it is accurate, impartial and reflects the and Law Program, recently completed a diversity of scientific opinion and Master’s degree in Science, Culture and The role of scientifically trained politi- acknowledges the often inconclusive Communication at the University of cians nature of research) cannot provide a Bath, UK. He holds a BSc in molecular The landslide Labour victory of 1997 substitute for scientific training among biology from the University of Edinburgh elected more Members of Parliament (MPs) legislators. and studied for a year on international with scientific qualifications than there had exchange at the University of California ever been before, but there are still only Governmental scientific advisory groups Santa Barbara. about 10% with a degree-level qualification Key bodies with science advisory in science, medicine or engineering (1).
    [Show full text]
  • DN Master Doc COMMISSIONING GUIDELINES SPRING 2011
    COMMISSIONING GUIDELINES SPRING 2012 1: THE COMMISSIONING PROCESS..............................................................................2 1:1 TIMETABLE.........................................................................................................2 1:2 HOW TO SUBMIT AN IDEA TO RADIO 4...........................................................3 1:3 RESPONSES TO PROPOSALS.........................................................................5 1:4 HOW THE COMMISSIONING BRIEFS WORK...................................................7 1:5 FAQ ABOUT THE COMMISSIONING PROCESS & PROTEUS.........................9 1:6 BBC GUIDELINES & COMPLIANCE.................................................................11 1:7 CHECKLIST FOR DRAMA AND SCRIPTED COMEDY....................................12 1:8 SUPPORTING MATERIALS FOR DRAMA AND COMEDY..............................13 2: THE BBC RADIO 4 AUDIENCE.................................................................................15 3: DRAMA COMMISSIONING BRIEFS..........................................................................17 4: COMEDY & ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSIONING BRIEFS.....................................46 5: SPECIALIST FACTUAL BRIEFS...............................................................................60 6: GENERAL FACTUAL BRIEFS...................................................................................79 7: SPECIAL EVENTS AND SEASONS...........................................................................96 8: WORKING WITH BBC RADIO 4................................................................................98
    [Show full text]
  • “File on 4” – “Torture by Facts?”
    BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION RADIO 4 TRANSCRIPT OF “FILE ON 4” – “TORTURE BY FACTS?” CURRENT AFFAIRS GROUP TRANSMISSION: Tuesday 28th July 2009 2000 - 2040 REPEAT: Sunday 2nd August 2009 1700 - 1740 REPORTER: Stephen Grey PRODUCER: Ian Muir-Cochrane EDITOR: David Ross PROGRAMME NUMBER: 09VQ4555LH0 Downloaded from The Rendition Project www.therenditionproject.org.uk 1 THE ATTACHED TRANSCRIPT WAS TYPED FROM A RECORDING AND NOT COPIED FROM AN ORIGINAL SCRIPT. BECAUSE OF THE RISK OF MISHEARING AND THE DIFFICULTY IN SOME CASES OF IDENTIFYING INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS, THE BBC CANNOT VOUCH FOR ITS COMPLETE ACCURACY. “FILE ON 4” Transmission: Tuesday 28th July 2009 Repeat: Sunday 2nd August 2009 Producer: Ian Muir-Cochrane Reporter: Stephen Grey Editor: David Ross MADNI: They put me in handcuffs and shackles and then they take me to plane, the CIA aircraft. Inside the aircraft they put me inside a box, was like a wood box, I was can’t move my body because the shackle was very tight and was very painful. GREY: This man says Britain was complicit in his extraordinary rendition. Others who’ve been tortured also claim a British connection. BINYAM: The interrogator was actually bringing in files and saying, ‘This is the British file.’ We spent months and months just answering questions from these files that were coming in from the UK. GREY: Tonight File on 4 asks if the British Government really was complicit in the torture of terrorist suspects and if British ministers should have spoken out sooner. Do you think in hindsight that the right degree of attention was paid to these matters? GOLDSMITH: Well, I, I, I … Well I took a bit of a different view on some of these issues, maybe to have been stronger in our condemnation of some of the things that had taken place might have been a good thing to do, for example, about treatment of detainees.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    HCO005214-0001 Other Document Form Title...~"-""r I fZ’4"4J~ " ’ 04"’ ~ 0 (" t,3 ~ /~ C444" ,’~ (Include source and any document number if relevant) Receivers instructions urgent action Ye~ Document registered/indexed as indicated No(s) of actions raised Statement readers instructions Indexed as indicated Code A No(s) of actions raised Examined - further action to be taken Further action no(s) When satisfied all ai~tions raised Office Manager to endorse other Document Master Number Form ..................................... I ..................................l-- HCO005214-0002 BBC Radio 4 - News - File on 4 - 25th Anniversary Page 1 of 4 Text only BBC Homepage BBC Radio A PR~ Radio 4 I I .I,sEo FILE ON 4 Go to the Liste~ Programme Finder: A-Z Transcript of the webchat with Dr James Kennedy, Listen Again Royal College of General Practitioners and Jenny ON/~R NOW Chryss, File on 4 producer. 09:00 - 09:45 What’s On Melvyn Bragg: In Presenter Biogs Audio Help News [ Curr’t Affairs BBC-Host: Hello and welcome to File On 4 Interactive. You Gambling (09/10/ Arts and Drama Linguistic Diversit can send in your questions and comments on tonight’s Comedy I Quizzes (02/1012002) programme to our guest, Dr James Kennedy, speaking on Sperm Donors (2! Science prescribing for the Royal College of General Practitioners, Farming (18/09/2 Religion 1 Ethics Testing in School: and to the programme producer, Jenny Chryss. Party Political Fun History Unfortunately, we won’t be able to discuss individual cases (04/09/2002) Corporate Respon Factual in detail but we will publish a follow-up list of organisations (28/08/2002) which can help with advice on the issues raised in the Alcohol and Socie Services: programme.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Group Annual Report and Accounts 2018/19
    BBC Group Annual Report and Accounts 2018/19 BBC Group Annual Report and Accounts 2018/19 Laid before the National Assembly for Wales by the Welsh Government Return to contents © BBC Copyright 2019 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as BBC copyright and the document title specified. Photographs are used ©BBC or used under the terms of the PACT agreement except where otherwise identified. Permission from copyright holders must be sought before any photographs are reproduced. You can download this publication from bbc.co.uk/annualreport Designed by Emperor emperor.works Prepared pursuant to the BBC Royal Charter 2016 (Article 37) Return to contents OVERVIEW Contents About the BBC 2 Inform, Educate, Entertain 4 Highlights from the year p.2 6 Award-winning content Strategic report 8 A message from the Chairman About the BBC 10 Director-General’s statement 16 Delivering our creative remit Highlights from the year and 18 – Impartial news and information award-winning content 22 – Learning for people of all ages 26 – Creative, distinctive, quality output 34 – Reflecting the UK’s diverse communities 48 – Reflecting the UK to the world 55 Audiences and external context 56 – Audience performance and market context 58 – Performance by Service 61 – Public Service Broadcasting expenditure p.8 62 – Charitable work
    [Show full text]
  • Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, Was Interviewed By
    Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, was interviewed by Robert Peston, BBC Business editor, for a File on 4 special on Northern Rock to be broadcast tonight at 8pm. TRANSCRIPT OF INTERVIEW for FILE ON FOUR ROBERT PESTON interviewing MERVYN KING RP: For a number of months the Bank of England had been warning the City and banks that some of the investments they made might not be so splendid – and there might be a liquidity problem. What prompted the Bank that there was a potentially big problem looming? MK: Well we’d been through a decade of extraordinarily low interest rates and that had encouraged people to invest in more risky and exotic instruments in order to earn the sort of rates of return to which they had become accustomed before we moved into a low inflation, low interest rate era. And people managed to persuade themselves that perhaps they weren’t taking such large risks and they were persuaded to buy and take onboard these new and complex financial instruments, which turned out to be both riskier and much more opaque than the investors had originally understood. And we said that because these instruments were both riskier and more opaque and complex, it was quite possible that one day the markets in those instruments would become illiquid. And hence, the ability to sell the instruments and realise cash would be diminished. And many banks were taking risks by building their strategy on the assumption that the markets in these instruments would remain continuously open and they would always be able to buy or sell them.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio 4 Listings for 13 – 19 March 2021 Page 1 of 14
    Radio 4 Listings for 13 – 19 March 2021 Page 1 of 14 SATURDAY 13 MARCH 2021 SAT 06:07 Ramblings (m000sz8t) Production Co-Ordinator: Carina Andrews Big Cats! Rick Minter in Gloucestershire Editor/Engineer: David Thomas SAT 00:00 Midnight News (m000t04k) The latest news and weather forecast from BBC Radio 4. Do big cats roam the British countryside? It’s a long running BBC Studios Production debate, one that’s never far from the headlines. A few years ago on Ramblings, Clare saw what she described as an “enormous SAT 00:30 Women vs Hollywood by Helen O'Hara black cat” on a walk near Ross on Wye. Several newspapers SAT 12:57 Weather (m000t4tq) (m000t04m) followed this up, as did the ‘Big Cat Conversations’ podcast The latest weather forecast The Women Who Fought Back which is hosted by Rick Minter: he set up a camera trap close to Clare’s sighting and made contact with Ramblings. So, for Film critic Helen O'Hara celebrates Hollywood’s female today’s walk, Clare and Rick explore the area around Selsley SAT 13:00 News (m000t4tv) pioneers - in front of and behind the camera - who fought Common in Gloucestershire and discuss why he’s so sure big The latest national and international news from BBC Radio 4 sexism and the power of the studio system to find their own cats do exist in rural Britain. voices and change film forever. Grid Ref for the layby where we parked: SO830027 SAT 13:10 Any Questions? (m000t048) The dawn of cinema was a free-for-all, and there were women Victoria Atkins MP, Daisy Cooper MP, Thangam Debbonaire who forged ahead in many areas of film-making.
    [Show full text]
  • “File on 4” – “The Disinformation Dragon”
    BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION RADIO 4 TRANSCRIPT OF “FILE ON 4” – “THE DISINFORMATION DRAGON” CURRENT AFFAIRS GROUP TRANSMISSION: Tuesday 9th March 2021 2000 - 2040 REPEAT: Sunday 14th March 2021 1700 - 1740 REPORTER: Paul Kenyon & Krassimira Twigg PRODUCER: Jim Booth EDITOR: Lucy Proctor PROGRAMME NUMBER: 20VQ6346LH0 - 1 - THE ATTACHED TRANSCRIPT WAS TYPED FROM A RECORDING AND NOT COPIED FROM AN ORIGINAL SCRIPT. BECAUSE OF THE RISK OF MISHEARING AND THE DIFFICULTY IN SOME CASES OF IDENTIFYING INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS, THE BBC CANNOT VOUCH FOR ITS COMPLETE ACCURACY. “FILE ON 4” Transmission: Tuesday 9th March 2021 Repeat: Sunday 14th March 2021 Producer: Jim Booth Reporter: Paul Kenyon & Krassimira Twigg Editor: Lucy Proctor ___________________________________________________________________________ MUSIC EXTRACT FROM CGTN NEWS REPORT, 18/2/2021 MAN: Almost two years later after the shutdown of …, we are again here at Fort Detrick. KENYON: This is a news report suggesting that the coronavirus might originally have come, not from China, but from a military research base in Maryland, America. It was made by Chinese state television, and aimed at an international audience - you and me. MAN: It was here where five residents have died following an outbreak of respiratory illness that began in the summer of 2019. KENYON: The suspicions aired in the report are baseless. It is innuendo and misinformation dressed up as investigative journalism. And tonight, an insider from China’s state television tells us why it’s happening. - 2 - INSIDER: It’s China’s official news office, so it’s from the top that has definitely issued this. And it’s a whole nation strategy to kind of fight back, to make people think, you know, we are innocent.
    [Show full text]