Rainier Square Development University of Washington Metropolitan Tract Rainier Square Redevelopment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Appendices APPENDIX B Pedestrian Le vel Wind Analysis APPENDIX C Transportation Impact Study APPENDIX D Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculation Spreadsheet Addendum to ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the Downtown Height and Density Changes January 2005 Addressing Environmental Impacts of Rainier Square Development University of Washington Metropolitan Tract Rainier Square Redevelopment Master Use Permit # 3017644 City of Seattle Department of Planning and Development APPENDIX B Pedestrian Level Wind Analysis Tel: 519.823.1311 Fax: 519.823.1316 Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. 650 Woodlawn Road West Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1K 1B8 5th Avenue and Union Street Seattle, WA Final Report Pedestrian Wind Consultation RWDI # 1402464 February 5, 2015 SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY Wright Runstad & Company William Schinkel, B.A.Sc. Technical Coordinator Care of: [email protected] Ron Klemencic, P.E., S.E., Hon. AIA Gregory P. Thompson, M.A.Sc. Chairman & CEO Senior Project Manager / Associate Magnusson Klemencic Associates [email protected] 1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA Jon K. Galsworthy, Ph.D., P.Eng. 98101-2699 Technical Director / Principal Direct: 206-215-8203 [email protected] Main: 206-292-1200 Mobile: 206-909-8208 [email protected] This document is intended for the sole use of the party to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately. ® RWDI name and logo are registered trademarks in Canada and the United States of America Reputation Resources Results Canada | USA | UK | India | China | Hong Kong | Singapore www.rwdi.com 5th Avenue and Union Street – Seattle, WA Pedestrian Wind Consultation RWDI#1402464 February 5, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 2. SUMMARY OF WIND CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 1 3. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................. 1 4. EXPLANATION OF CRITERIA ............................................................................................................ 2 5. PREDICTED WIND CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... 3 5.1 Wind Safety ................................................................................................................................... 3 5.2 Wind Comfort – Existing Configuration ......................................................................................... 3 5.3 Wind Comfort – Proposed Configuration ...................................................................................... 4 6. APPLICABILITY ................................................................................................................................... 4 7. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Tables Table 1: Pedestrian Wind Comfort and Safety Conditions Figures Figure 1a: Wind Tunnel Study Model – Existing Configuration Figure 1b: Wind Tunnel Study Model – Proposed Configuration Figure 2: Directional Distribution of Winds – Seattle Tacoma International Airport Figure 3a: Pedestrian Wind Comfort Conditions – Existing – Summer Figure 3b: Pedestrian Wind Comfort Conditions – Proposed – Summer Figure 4a: Pedestrian Wind Comfort Conditions – Existing – Winter Figure 4b: Pedestrian Wind Comfort Conditions – Proposed – Winter Appendices Appendix A: Drawing List for Model Construction Reputation Resources Results Canada | USA | UK | India | China | Hong Kong | Singapore www.rwdi.com 5th Avenue and Union Street – Seattle, WA Pedestrian Wind Consultation RWDI#1402464 February 5, 2015 Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. (RWDI) was retained by Wright Runstad & Company to consult on the pedestrian wind conditions for the proposed 5th Avenue and Union Street development in Seattle, WA. The purpose of the study was to assess the wind environment around the development in terms of pedestrian wind comfort and safety. The achievement of this objective included wind tunnel testing of a 1:400 scale model of the proposed development for the following configurations: Configuration A - Existing: existing and in-construction surroundings; and, Configuration B - Proposed: existing and in-construction surroundings with the proposed development included. The photographs in Figures 1a and 1b show the test model in RWDI's boundary-layer wind tunnel. The project consists of two buildings: a 59-story mixed-use tower and a 12-story hotel. The mixed-use tower and hotel are approximately 836 ft and 122 ft high, respectively. The test model was constructed using the design information and drawings listed in Appendix A. This report summarizes the methodology of wind tunnel studies for pedestrian wind conditions, describes the RWDI pedestrian wind comfort and safety criteria, presents the local wind conditions and their effects on pedestrians. The placement of wind measurement locations was based on our experience and understanding of the pedestrian usage for this site, and was reviewed by members of the design team. 2. SUMMARY OF WIND CONDITIONS The wind conditions around the proposed 5th Avenue and Union Street development are discussed in detail in Section 5 of this report and may be summarized as follows: All locations are predicted to pass the wind criterion used to assess pedestrian wind safety. Wind conditions remain generally unchanged with the addition of the proposed development. Appropriate wind comfort conditions are expected at all locations surrounding the proposed development. 3. METHODOLOGY As shown in Figures 1a and 1b, the wind tunnel model included the proposed development and all relevant surrounding buildings and topography within a 1600 ft radius of the study site. The boundary- layer wind conditions beyond the modelled area were also simulated in RWDI's wind tunnel. The model was instrumented with 71 wind speed sensors to measure mean and gust wind speeds at a full-scale height of approximately 5 ft. These measurements were recorded for 36 equally incremented wind directions. Reputation Resources Results Canada | USA | UK | India | China | Hong Kong | Singapore www.rwdi.com 5th Avenue and Union Street – Seattle, WA Pedestrian Wind Consultation RWDI#1402464 February 5, 2015 Page 2 Wind statistics recorded at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport between 1982 and 2012 were analysed for the Summer (May through October) and Winter (November through April) seasons. Figure 2 graphically depicts the directional distributions of wind frequencies and speeds for the two seasons. Winds from the south through southwest, north and northeast directions are predominant in both the summer and winter as indicated by the wind roses. Strong winds of a mean speed greater than 20 mph measured at the airport (at an anemometer height of 33 ft) occur more often in the winter (2.4%) than the summer (less than 1% of the time). Wind statistics from the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport were combined with the wind tunnel data in order to predict the frequency of occurrence of full-scale wind speeds. The full-scale wind predictions were then compared with the RWDI criteria for pedestrian comfort and safety. 4. EXPLANATION OF CRITERIA The RWDI pedestrian wind criteria are used in the current study. These criteria have been developed by RWDI through research and consulting practice since 1974 (References 1 through 6). They have also been widely accepted by municipal authorities as well as by the building design and city planning community. RWDI Pedestrian Wind Criteria Comfort GEM Speed Description Category (mph) Calm or light breezes desired for outdoor restaurants and seating areas Sitting ≤ 6 where one can read a paper without having it blown away Standing ≤ 8 Gentle breezes suitable for main building entrances and bus stops Moderate winds that would be appropriate for window shopping and Strolling ≤ 10 strolling along a downtown street, plaza or park Relatively high speeds that can be tolerated if one’s objective is to walk, Walking ≤ 12 run or cycle without lingering Strong winds of this magnitude are considered a nuisance for most Uncomfortable > 12 activities, and wind mitigation is typically recommended Notes: (1) Gust Equivalent Mean (GEM) speed = max(mean speed, gust speed/1.85); and (2) GEM speeds listed above are based on a seasonal exceedance of 20% of the time between 6:00 and 23:00. Safety Gust Speed Description Criterion (mph) Excessive gust speeds that can adversely affect a pedestrian's balance Exceeded > 56 and footing. Wind mitigation is typically required. Note: Based on an annual exceedance of 9 hours or 0.1% of the time for 24 hours a day. Reputation Resources Results Canada | USA | UK | India | China | Hong Kong | Singapore www.rwdi.com 5th Avenue and Union Street – Seattle, WA Pedestrian Wind Consultation RWDI#1402464 February 5, 2015 Page 3 A few additional comments are provided below to further explain the wind criteria and their applications. Both mean and gust speeds can affect pedestrian comfort and their combined effect is typically quantified by a Gust Equivalent Mean (GEM) speed, with a gust factor of 1.85 (References 1, 5, 7 and