Evolution &Creation When Did Death Begin? Adventisttoday Editor J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ADRA Hosts Sydney Igeneration Concert SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES
October 13, 2007 In this issue Women pray with PNGUM leaders New “home” for SNZ Conference Adventist World issue Sydney’s iGeneration concert celebrated the role young people play in supporting those in need by raising funds for the ADRA Appeal. ADRA hosts Sydney iGeneration concert SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES n September 1, the iGeneration con- talented performers and an enthusiastic cert was held in Sydney to celebrate audience,” said co-host Litiana Qiosese. the contribution of young people to “Watching the young people get involved Othis year’s Adventist Development not only on the night but also in doing and Relief Agency (ADRA) Appeal. something to help the poor was great. This The concert featured a number of Aus- generation can make a difference.” tralian artists including Australian Idol Young people from the Greater Sydney Students fi nalist Joseph Gatehau, popular Chris- Conference gained entry to the concert on tian singer Skylla, Endless Praise and presentation of an ADRA Appeal church Melissa Otto. treasurer’s receipt that showed they had The iGeneration concert was hosted by raised $A50 or more for the Appeal. They serve local Adventist youth speakers and includ- also received a free iGeneration T-shirt. ed segments with giveaways and interviews For those unable to fundraise for ADRA, with ADRA supporters. tickets for entry were sold at at the door. community “The night was really fantastic, with very (Continued on page 3) ISSN 0819-5633 3399 CCover.inddover.indd 1 11/10/07/10/07 33:44:34:44:34 PPMM 95 $14 AUS 50 $18 NZ AnotherAnA other collectionco of real- lillifefe stories ini the tradition ofo OrOrdindarydindar People— ExEExtraordinarytraordina God. -
200 Years of Sabbath-Keeping in Australia
200 YEARS OF SABBATH KEEPING IN AUSTRALIA A paper presented by Bruce Dean, Pastor, United Church of God, at the Friends of the Sabbath Conference held in Sydney, 5–8 July 1996. Contents Our Beginnings ..................................................................................... 2 The Jews................................................................................................ 2 The Seventh-Day Adventists ................................................................ 3 The Remnant Church of God................................................................ 5 The Worldwide Church of God ............................................................ 5 The Church of God (Seventh Day)....................................................... 6 The Churches of God............................................................................ 6 Seventh Day Baptists............................................................................ 6 Personal Experience.............................................................................. 7 Hebrews 12: 1–2 ................................................................................... 8 Extra Information?................................................................................ 8 2 200 Years of Sabbath Keeping in Australia My aim is to outline the history of sabbath The Jews keeping in Australia. My personal history is very Australian: my family came out from There were at least eight and possibly fourteen England early in the 1800’s; we were at the Jews on the First Fleet. -
"Intermediate" Models of Origins
Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 15/1 (Autumn 2004): 71–92. Article copyright © 2004 by Jim Gibson. Issues in “Intermediate” Models of Origins Jim Gibson Geoscience Research Institute Discussion of issues in creation is often focused on contrasting the theory of naturalistic evolution with the biblical model of a recent, six-day creation. The differences between these two theories are profound, and the contrasts can read- ily be identified in such issues as whether the universe and human life were pur- posefully designed, the nature and extent of God’s actions in the universe, and the extent to which answers to philosophical questions can be inferred from na- ture and from Scripture. Biblical creation is based on a literal-phenomenal1 interpretation of Genesis 1–3 and other creation texts. The biblical model affirms that humans were sepa- rately created in a supernatural act of creation, some thousands of years ago, at the end of a six-day creation. They were endowed with the image of God and the possibility of eternal life. The original human pair freely chose to distrust God, bringing death and other evils into the world. By contrast, naturalistic evolution is based on a naturalistic approach to sci- ence, without respect to biblical teachings. Naturalistic (“scientific”) evolution claims that humans developed from ape-like ancestors, through strictly natural processes, over several millions of years. Humans have no special status in na- ture, and there is no basis for believing in life after death. Death, disease, and suffering are simply natural by-products of the processes operating in nature and cannot be considered good or evil in any “moral” sense. -
Perspectives on 1844: Putting the Pieces Together
$5.00 november | december 2006 adventist today volume 14 issue 6 Perspectives on 1844: Putting the Pieces Together LOOKING BACK AT GLACIER VIEW: : 08 1844, A PERSONAL JOURNEY: : 18 Foundation Board Elwin Dunn—Board Chair Editorial | John McLarty Ervin Taylor—Board Vice-Chair Eugene Platt—Treasurer John McLarty Greg Billock Keith Colburn Diana Fisher Problems Edmund Jones Chuck Mitchell Madelyn Nelson Jim Nelson Randy Roberts Nate Schilt with 1844 In some ways Eldon Stratton James Stirling » John Vogt 1844 functions like the James Walters he date, 1844, is included in Kit Watts Article 23 of the Adventist creed. appendix in the human body. Raymond F. Cottrell (See box.) Religious communities We can’t deny it’s there, Endowment Board James Walters—Board Chair add to but almost never subtract but we don’t know what it’s Douglass Ewing James Nelson from creedal statements. Nate Schilt good for. Ervin Taylor TAdventist scholars who question the adequacy or Advisory Council accuracy of the biblical interpretation supporting Now, it is important to note that the ministerial SENIOR LIFETIME ADVISORS* secretary and both pastors are devout conservatives. Beth and Elwin Dunn this judgment chronology risk being expelled as Kathi and Richard Guth They believe the church’s teaching about 1844. But Marilynn and Ervin Taylor heretics. So 1844 will likely remain the teaching of their professional judgment was that people who Priscilla and James Walters show up at church showing a keen interest in 1844 the church. must be carefully watched, lest they cause conflict LIFETIME ADVISORS** This permanence of 1844 in Adventist doctrine Betty and Al Koppel and division in the congregation. -
Creation and Theodicy: Protological Presuppositions in Evolutionary Theodicy
Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 25/2 (2014): 3-28. Article copyright © 2014 by Adriani Milli Rodrigues. Creation and Theodicy: Protological Presuppositions in Evolutionary Theodicy Adriani Milli Rodrigues Adventist University of Sao Paulo, Brazil There are different positions regarding the understanding of the doctrine of creation in the face of the challenge of the evolutionary concept of origins. In broad terms, while some deny the theory of evolution1 in favor of a literal interpretation of the Genesis account of creation, many scholars attempt to comprehend this doctrine in certain consonance with that theory.2 1 The present study acknowledges the distinction between macroevolution and microevolution. The references to evolution in this text imply the concept of macroevolution. While microevolution refers to small changes within one species, macroevolution describes “the evolution of major new characteristics that make organisms recognizable as a new species, genus, family, or higher taxon.” Stanley A. Rice, Encyclopedia of Evolution (New York: Infobase, 2009), 253. This distinction between microevolution and macroevolution is used, for example, by Stephen Jay Gould. See S. J. Gould, The Panda’s Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History, reissued ed. (New York: Norton, 1992), 187-192. 2 Edward B. Davis indicates “four main patterns” that “govern most religious responses to evolution today: complementary” (“theological truths exist in a higher realm apart from scientific truths”), conflict against evolution (“rejection of evolution”), conflict against Christianity (“rejection of Christianity”), and “doctrinal reformulation” (“rejection of divine transcendence and the wholesale reformulation of traditional Christian doctrine”). Edward B. Davis, “The Word and the Works: Concordism and American Evangelicals,” in Perspectives on an Evolving Creation, ed. -