USPS Looks for the Next Generation Delivery Vehicle He Long Life Vehicle Could Finally Be Approaching the End of Its Life

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

USPS Looks for the Next Generation Delivery Vehicle He Long Life Vehicle Could Finally Be Approaching the End of Its Life Carostal vehicles are partand of daily life for an vehiclesCarrier take on new meaning for the young and active letter carrier. A truck is just another the old, alike. tool, like a satchel or case, for doing our With the Postal Service looking to replace its ag- Pjobs. But postal vehicles are a familiar sym- ing fleet of vehicles, The Postal Record takes a look bol of the trust and reliability of the Postal Ser- forward at the design process for the postal vehicle vice—almost as recognizable as letter carriers. For of the future and a look back at postal vehicles that many, older postal vehicles are nostalgic remind- letter carriers used in the past, including some that ers of the old days. And as they evolve, postal have found new lives. Back in time with previous generations’ postal vehicles etter carriers have always enlisted some of the vehicles that city carriers wagons, which were used to transport the help of wheeled vehicles to bear have used throughout the history of mail between post offices and train Lthe load of mail and packages. The the U.S. Postal Service. stations in large cities from the 1870s vehicles they have used have changed When door-to-door mail delivery to the first decade of the 20th century. dramatically with carriers’ needs and became a popular service in the United The wagons were usually painted red, the technology available. From the States during the Civil War, postal white and blue with gold lettering. simple horse-drawn wagon of yester- employees used horse-drawn carts to By the late 1890s, regulation wagons year to today’s Long Life Vehicle (LLV) extend their range beyond the mail they began to be phased out in favor of to tomorrow’s Next Generation Postal could carry in a satchel or atop a horse. lighter and less-expensive screen Vehicle, the postal vehicle continues to One of the first photos of postal wagons. Named for the built-in screen change with the times. Here’s a look at horse-drawn wagons shows regulation cages that protected the mail, screen USPS looks for the Next Generation Delivery Vehicle he Long Life Vehicle could finally be approaching the end of its life. T The Grumman LLV has been around for 30 years, longer than the original design’s intended lifespan of 24 years. In addition to the LLV, the U.S. Postal Service currently operates a fleet that includes left-hand drive, multiple-sized and alternative fuel vehicles, along with commercially available vehicles such as cargo vans and mixed-delivery vehicles. With the LLV at or beyond the end of its lifespan, USPS is continuing a years- long process of developing the next generation of delivery vehicles. “Our goal is to obtain vehicles that will help us provide reliable and effi- cient delivery service for customers and honor our commitment to reducing the environmental impact of our fleet, while Specifications released by the Postal Service meeting the needs of our employees 12 The Postal Record August 2017 Postal vehicle timeline Regulation wagon, circa 1895 Electric automobile, 1901 Columbia automobile, 1906 wagons were used from the late 1880s their drivers, with letter carriers riding pany—thanks to the popularity of its until they were gradually replaced by along and collecting mail from the mail-order catalogue—handled five motor vehicles. boxes. The Post Office Dept. concluded times as many orders as it had the year In 1900, the production of auto- that one automobile could do twice the before. Although trucks were used to mobiles in the United States was work of a horse-drawn cart, paving the haul Parcel Post packages as early as about equally divided among models way for further use of automobiles. 1913, old-fashioned horse power held powered by electric power, steam and Some letter carriers began using on until the 1920s. gasoline. What was then known as the motorcycles on their routes in the The speed of the new powered Post Office Department (POD) joined 1910s and 1920s—models such as “The vehicles, and the productivity im- the automobile craze by employing all Flying Merkel,” a belt-driven, two- provements they brought, soon ran three kinds to move mail. Only later cylinder V-twin motorcycle. But four- up against speed limits. In fact, in did gasoline engines come to dominate wheeled automobiles and trucks soon October 1913, about 100 drivers for the market, in part because of Henry became the vehicles of choice due to the Postal Transfer Service Company, Ford’s successful mass production of their larger capacities. a mail contractor in New York City, the Model T. With the larger, faster vehicles in went on strike. Chief among the driv- On Oct. 1, 1906, the POD began using service, the POD initiated Parcel Post ers’ complaints was that the police its first gasoline-powered automobiles service on Jan. 1, 1913. It was an instant had recently decided to enforce the to collect mail from boxes in Balti- success, with 300 million parcels city’s 20 mph speed limit, which was more through a contractor. The mail mailed in the first six months alone. making it difficult for them to meet the contractor supplied both the cars and That year, Sears, Roebuck and Com- company’s schedules. (The strike was t to best do their jobs safely,” the Postal Letter carrier input was included in “To this end, the Postal Service has Service said in a press release. the specifications for what the suppli- asked automakers to consider a ‘fully On Jan. 20, 2015, USPS began the ac- ers must include in their designs. “We enclosed van style body’ that would quisition process with a formal request have spent a considerable amount of have internal cargo capacity and even for information and a kickoff meeting time talking to letter carriers in different sliding side doors,” The New York Times for technology and automotive suppli- parts of the country about what they reported in March 2015. ers. “The robust and open process was would like to see in a new vehicle,” Additionally, USPS wants backup designed to attract the most innovative Renfroe, now NALC’s executive vice cameras and warning systems, ergo- and cutting-edge technological solu- president, continued. “While some of nomic seats and doors, airbags and tions,” the Postal Service said. the input is specific to certain climates antiskid surfaces, the newspaper NALC has been involved in the pro- or geographic areas, there are quite a reported. Fuel efficiency is expected to cess, advising the Postal Service on the few common suggestions. The Postal be a major focus as well. point of view of letter carriers. As then- Service has incorporated our sugges- USPS then reviewed the responses Director of City Delivery Brian Renfroe tions into a lengthy document that and whittled the list down to 15 suppli- said in the April 2015 Postal Record, includes specifications for the next- ers, determined to be prequalified, to “We have had weekly meetings with the generation delivery vehicle.” submit proposals to develop prototype Postal Service to discuss various city Details of what is expected in the vehicles. In October 2015, USPS gave delivery issues, such as what should be vehicles have emerged, based on the those 15 suppliers access to the pro- included in a new vehicle. Our main ob- requirements USPS has put forward. cessing and delivery environment and jective is to ensure that any new vehicle One requirement: Letter carriers must employees, and asked them to submit is safe, ergonomic and as convenient as be able to stand up in the vehicle proposals for vehicles designed for possible for letter carriers, and accom- and walk to the rear of the vehicle, USPS’ delivery needs. modates the work we do now and will do where more room for packages is As part of that process, NALC selected in the future.” expected. three letter carriers to provide detailed, t August 2017 The Postal Record 13 Motorcycle, circa 1911 Parcel Post truck, 1913 Automobile, circa 1914 Automobile, 1930 unsuccessful—the company, which Jeeps were used for mail delivery by ally rendered hand-sorting of mail by had a history of vigorous anti-union rural carriers in the 1940s. In the 1950s, traveling clerks obsolete. The last HPO activities, fired all the striking drivers.) right-hand drive Jeep models were in- rolled between Cincinnati and Cleve- Within a few years, the Post Office troduced for city carriers on suburban land on June 30, 1974. Dept. began buying its own trucks routes. Jeeps remained in general use In the 1950s, the Post Office Dept. instead of relying on contract trucks through the late 1980s. began fully motorizing city delivery and drivers. One of the advantages of In 1941, Highway Post Offices routes. Using motor vehicles, letter postal-owned trucks was their versa- (HPOs)—essentially buses outfitted as carriers could deliver more mail, more tility. Whereas the use of contracted portable post offices—made their first quickly. vehicles was restricted to precise appearance when a route was estab- The right-hand drive Zip Van, one of contract terms, postal-owned trucks lished between Washington, DC, and the first large vehicles designed specifi- could fill needs as they arose. Thus, Harrisonburg, VA, serving more than cally for city carriers, allowed a carrier the same vehicle could be used to col- 20 intermediate post offices. HPOs to drive while standing up and easily lect and dispatch mail, transport mail were similar in function to railway post deliver mail and packages. between facilities, deliver Parcel Post, offices. Like railway mail clerks aboard The Westcoaster mailster was intro- and even transport letter carriers to trains, clerks on board HPOs sorted duced in the early 1950s.
Recommended publications
  • INTERNATIONAL TRUCK & ENGINE COW, Ooiootoaoa
    Page: 6 Friday August 22, 2003 Docket: 01-022Nll-B Comment Date Date of Number Received SubmitterlFinnlSubject Document ___-__________ 09003 0312612003 1 01123l2001 DANIEL'S CERTIFIED WAHLING INC. 09004 03/26/2003 2 01/24/2001 LIPPERT COMPONENT MFG. INC. 09005 0312612003 1 0411 012001 DAN GURNEY ALLIGATOR MOTORCYCLES INC. 09006 0312612003 1 0211 612000 CYCLE CONCEPTS OF NEW YORK INC. 09007 0312612003 2 04103l2002 IRISBUS 09008 0312612003 STEPHAN J. SPETH 10 04/26/2002 DAIMLER CYRYSLER 09009 0312612003 9 04/26/2002 INTERNATIONAL TRUCK & ENGINE CON. 090 10 0312612003 ARTHUR DELAROSA 2 0510612002 VOLVO 0901 1 0312612003 SUZANNE K. PETERSON 3 0411 112002 VICTORY MOTORCYCLES USA 090 12 0312612003 42 0511712002 GENERAL MOTORS (GM) USG 3680 090 13 0312612003 LOUIS J. CARLIN 43 0511712002 GENERAL MOTORS (GM) USG 3682 090 14 03l2612003 PETER M. YI 5 05102l2002 DREAM TOUR 090 15 0312612003 2 05/02/2002 ADVANCED TRANSP. TECH. R & D 09016 03/26/2003 3 0410412002 B AND M TRAILER SALES 090 17 03l2612003 KEVIN E. KIRSCHKE 20 0513 112002 FORD MOTOR CO. 09018 03l2612003 2 ooiootoaoa PATRIOT MOTORCYCLES 09019 0312612003 RICHARD KEMPF 9 0lI2812002 INTERNATIONAL TRUCK & ENGINE COW, GENERAL MOTORS NORTH AMERICA Safety Center May 17, 2002 01- USG 3682 Office of the Administrator National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20590 Attention: Mr. George Entwistle, VIN Coordinator Subject: Update of General Motors Vehicle Identification Number decoding for 2003 Model Year Dear Mr. Entwistle: The latest revision of the General Motors Vehicle Identification Numbering (VIN) Standard for 2003 model year dated May, 2002 is submitted per the VIN reporting requirements of 49 CFR Part 565.7.
    [Show full text]
  • DAIMLER AG, : : Defendant
    Case 1:10-cr-00063-RJL Document 3 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff : : v. : : CRIMINAL NO.: 1:10-CR-063 DAIMLER AG, : : Defendant. : __________________________________________: NOTICE OF FILING OF DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT The United States of America, by and through its counsel, the United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section (the “Department”), hereby gives notice of the filing of the attached deferred prosecution agreement between the Department and Daimler AG in the above-styled matter. Respectfully submitted, DENIS J. MCINERNEY Chief, Fraud Section /s/ John S. Darden Assistant Chief, Fraud Section United States Department of Justice Criminal Division 1400 New York Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 514-7023 Case 1:10-cr-00063-RJL Document 3 Filed 03/24/10 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 24, 2010, the undersigned electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. /s/ John S. Darden 2 Case 1:10-cr-00063-RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 98 UNITED STATES DISTRICTDISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA '2 JJ,S, ijiSTRH::'T COtJHT UNITED STATES OFOF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NO. _______ DAIMLERAG, DEFERREDDEFERRD PROSECUTION PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Defendant. Defendant Daimler AGAG ("Daimler"), a public corporation organized under the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany,Gennany, by its undersignedundersigned attorneys,attorneys, pursuant to authorityauthority granted by Daimler'sDaiinler's Board Boardof of Management, and the UnitedUnited StatesStates Department Deparment ofJustice, CriminalCriminal Divisiun, Fraud Section (the(the "Department"Department ofJustice"ofJustice" or the "Department")"Department") enter intointo thisthis DeferredProsecution DeferredProsecution Agreement (the "Agreement").
    [Show full text]
  • Post Office Llv Shop Manual 2019
    Post Office Llv Shop Manual 2019 If you are looking for the ebook Post office llv shop manual 2019 in pdf form, then you have come on to the loyal website. We present full option of this ebook in DjVu, PDF, ePub, doc, txt formats. You can read online Post office llv shop manual 2019 either download. Additionally, on our website you can reading the guides and another art eBooks online, or load theirs. We want to invite regard what our website does not store the book itself, but we give reference to the site wherever you may downloading either read online. If have must to downloading pdf Post office llv shop manual 2019, then you've come to the correct website. We own Post office llv shop manual 2019 doc, DjVu, PDF, ePub, txt forms. We will be glad if you return us again and again. online chevrolet llv service & repair manual - - Online Repair Manual Home > Chevrolet > LLV Online Chevrolet LLV Repair Manual Software This online repair manual software is easy to use and you are covered by grumman llv - wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - The Grumman Long Life Vehicle, also known as the LLV, is an American light transport truck. The Grumman LLV was designed for the United States Postal Service, which usps s latest solution for aging long - postal - LONG LIFE VEHICLE (LLV) There shall be a fully detailed service manual provided in some family member of the post office management that made this post office - At the Post Office our aim is to provide you with the things that are important to you Whether you pop into a branch or shop online, 1989
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Million U.S. Cars Built Overtime Janesville, Wis
    production Arlington, Texas truck x x Scheduled plant Doraville, Ga. truck x - Fort Wayne, Ind. truck x - 1 million U.S. cars built overtime Janesville, Wis. Plant (Line 1) truck - x DaimlerChrysler Linden, N.J. truck - x ■ 3/24-3/28 3/29 Moraine, Ohio truck - x Year-to-date U.S. car production lerChrysler, 15.3 percent; Honda of Saltillo, Mexico truck x - Oklahoma City truck x x reached 1 million on Monday, America Manufacturing Inc., 8.1 St. Louis (North) truck x x Oshawa, Ontario truck x x St. Louis (South) truck - x March 17, six days later than in percent; Toyota Motor Manufactur- Toledo, Ohio (North) truck x - 2002. U.S. car production is down ing North America Inc., 4.9 percent; Toledo, Ohio (South) truck x x Plant closings 128,740 units. Nissan Motor Manufacturing Corp. Ford ■ 3/17-3/21 3/22 Plant Week(s) Units lost Ford Motor Co. will halt produc- U.S.A., 4.0 percent; New United Mo- down per week Edison, N.J. truck x - tion this week at its Hermosillo, tor Manufacturing Inc., 2.4 percent; Kansas City, Mo. truck x - Ford Lorain, Ohio truck x - Avon Lake, Ohio Mexico, plant because of slow sales. Volkswagen of America, 1.9 percent; Ford Escape1 Louisville, Ky. truck x - The plant, which produces the Ford Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of Michigan Truck Hermosillo, Mexico 3/17 2,400 (Wayne, Mich.) truck x - GM Escort ZX2 and Focus, has been America Inc., 1.2 percent; BMW Norfolk, Va. truck x - Fairfax (Kansas City, Kan.)2 down two other times this year be- Manufacturing Corp., 1.0 percent; Ontario Truck Lansing Craft Centre (Oakville, Ontario) truck x - (Lansing, Mich.)3 cause of slow sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan State Police Tests 2003 Patrol Vehicles
    National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center BULLETIN A Program of the National Institute of Justice December 2002 Michigan State Police Tests 2003 Patrol Vehicles atrol vehicles are among the most results to State and local law enforcement critical purchases that a law enforce- agencies, NIJ helps these agencies select vehi- P ment agency makes. For both large cles that maximize their budgets and ensures and small agencies, patrol vehicle purchases that evaluated vehicles provide reliable and frequently represent the second largest ex- safe performance under the increased penditure, after personnel, in their annual demands of police service. operating budgets. Selecting a vehicle that The 2003 model year patrol vehicles were balances both budgetary and performance evaluated from September 21 through 23, requirements has become an increasingly 2002. For the purposes of the MSP evalua- challenging task for police fleet administra- tion, police-package vehicles are those that tors. Many agencies are painfully aware of are designed and manufactured for use in the consequences that result from being the full spectrum of law enforcement patrol “penny wise and pound foolish,” where service, including pursuits. A special-service vehicles with inadequate performance, such vehicle is a vehicle that may be used by law as regular production passenger vehicles not enforcement agencies for specialized use specifically designed for police service, are (e.g., off-road, inclement weather, K–9, or selected because they cost less than police- commercial vehicle enforcement), but is not package vehicles. Although some agencies designed or manufactured to be used in high have had limited success with nontraditional speed or pursuit situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated As of June 21, 2012 MAKE Manufacturer AC a C AMF a M F ABAR Abarth COBR AC Cobra SKMD Academy Mobile Homes (Mfd
    Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated as of June 21, 2012 MAKE Manufacturer AC A C AMF A M F ABAR Abarth COBR AC Cobra SKMD Academy Mobile Homes (Mfd. by Skyline Motorized Div.) ACAD Acadian ACUR Acura ADET Adette AMIN ADVANCE MIXER ADVS ADVANCED VEHICLE SYSTEMS ADVE ADVENTURE WHEELS MOTOR HOME AERA Aerocar AETA Aeta DAFD AF ARIE Airel AIRO AIR-O MOTOR HOME AIRS AIRSTREAM, INC AJS AJS AJW AJW ALAS ALASKAN CAMPER ALEX Alexander-Reynolds Corp. ALFL ALFA LEISURE, INC ALFA Alfa Romero ALSE ALL SEASONS MOTOR HOME ALLS All State ALLA Allard ALLE ALLEGRO MOTOR HOME ALCI Allen Coachworks, Inc. ALNZ ALLIANZ SWEEPERS ALED Allied ALLL Allied Leisure, Inc. ALTK ALLIED TANK ALLF Allison's Fiberglass mfg., Inc. ALMA Alma ALOH ALOHA-TRAILER CO ALOU Alouette ALPH Alpha ALPI Alpine ALSP Alsport/ Steen ALTA Alta ALVI Alvis AMGN AM GENERAL CORP AMGN AM General Corp. AMBA Ambassador AMEN Amen AMCC AMERICAN CLIPPER CORP AMCR AMERICAN CRUISER MOTOR HOME Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated as of June 21, 2012 AEAG American Eagle AMEL AMERICAN ECONOMOBILE HILIF AMEV AMERICAN ELECTRIC VEHICLE LAFR AMERICAN LA FRANCE AMI American Microcar, Inc. AMER American Motors AMER AMERICAN MOTORS GENERAL BUS AMER AMERICAN MOTORS JEEP AMPT AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION AMRR AMERITRANS BY TMC GROUP, INC AMME Ammex AMPH Amphicar AMPT Amphicat AMTC AMTRAN CORP FANF ANC MOTOR HOME TRUCK ANGL Angel API API APOL APOLLO HOMES APRI APRILIA NEWM AR CORP. ARCA Arctic Cat ARGO Argonaut State Limousine ARGS ARGOSY TRAVEL TRAILER AGYL Argyle ARIT Arista ARIS ARISTOCRAT MOTOR HOME ARMR ARMOR MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC ARMS Armstrong Siddeley ARNO Arnolt-Bristol ARRO ARROW ARTI Artie ASA ASA ARSC Ascort ASHL Ashley ASPS Aspes ASVE Assembled Vehicle ASTO Aston Martin ASUN Asuna CAT CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO ATK ATK America, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 GES Coding and Editing Manual 1999
    U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration General Estimates System Coding And Editing Manual 1999 Table of Contents Variables/Questions are displayed in data entry order. Variable/Question Name Index .......................................... vi PAR A22 Police Jurisdiction ................................................1 A01 Date ...........................................................2 A02 Time ...........................................................3 A23 Stratum .........................................................5 PAR Configuration Questions A03 Number of Motor Vehicles ..........................................8 A04 Number of Non-Motorists ..........................................11 Events E01 Event Number -- NEW VARIABLE ...................................13 V01 Vehicle Number (This Vehicle) ......................................19 V24 Initial Point of Impact (This Vehicle) ..................................20 E02 Action -- NEW VARIABLE .........................................24 A06 First Harmful Event ..............................................27 V01 Vehicle Number (Other Vehicle) ....................................39 V24 Initial Point of Impact (Other Vehicle) .................................40 A07 Manner of Collision ..............................................44 Crash Data Questions A05 Land Use ......................................................47 A25 Work Zone .....................................................48 A21 School Bus Related ..............................................49
    [Show full text]
  • I!1'C[F&!) POSTAL RATE Commlsston WASHINGTON, DC
    BEFORE THE i!1‘C[f&!) POSTAL RATE COMMlSStON ‘(3 Ii WASHINGTON, DC. 20266~661 5 2J, p/j 90, pw:,I fi,\iE c”, OFFICEOF r//C s;hkk,>,,,, POSTAL RATE AND FEE CHANGES,2001 i Docket No. R2001-1 RESPONSE OF UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE WITNESS TAYMAN TO INTERROGATORIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE (OCA/USPS-T&l-21) The United States Postal Service hereby provides the responses of witness Tayman to the following interrogatories of the Office of the Consumer Advocate: OCA/USPS-T6-l-21, filed on October 3,200l. Each interrogatory is stated verbatim and is followed by the response. Respectfully submitted, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE By its attorneys: Daniel J. Foucheaux, Jr. Chief Counsel, Ratemaking 475 L’Enfant Plaza West, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20260-l 137 (202) 266-2999; Fax -5402 October 17,200l RESPONSE OF UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE WITNESS TAYMAN TO INTERROGATORIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE OCA/USPS-16-l. The following refer to the USPS FY 2001 and FY 2002 Operating Plans. (a) Please provide the FY 2001 Operating Plan and the most current USPS FY 2002 Operating Plan by accounting periods for Postal Service operating revenues, appropriations, investment income, expenses and volumes. 04 For each of the thirteen accounting periods presented in part “a” of this interrogatory, please provide the most current USPS Operating Plan with operating revenues broken out by mail class and subclass cost categories. RESPONSE: (a) The FY 2001 Operating Plan by accounting period is attached. The FY 2002 accounting period Operating Plan has not been finalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You! a T T a C H M E N T
    AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION Bus & Paratransit Conference Planning Subcommittee Hilton Americas-Houston ● Room 340 Saturday, October 11, 2014 ● 1-3 p.m. MEETING AGENDA PLAN BUS & PARATRANSIT CONFERENCE MAY 3-6, 2015 Omni Fort Worth Hotel, 1300 Houston St., & Fort Worth Convention Center, 1201 Houston St., Fort Worth, TX 1. Welcome and host information – Paul Ballard and Nancy Amos (1 p.m.) 2. Review conference schedule overview and subcommittee’s work plan, decide on NTI courses – Lynne Morsen and Paul Larrousse (1:10) 3. Select abstracts ― breakout discussion groups organized by topics or “routes of study” to form sessions with abstracts – All (1:20 p.m.) 4. Identify invitational sessions (not having to do with abstracts) and suggest speakers for invitational / concurrent sessions and large, general sessions – All (2:30 p.m.) 5. 2016 conference in Charlotte, NC – Larry Kopf (2:45 p.m.) 6. Other business (2:50 p.m.) Attachments: 1. 2015 Bus & Paratransit Conference overview 2. Subcommittee work plan 3. Notes from May 2014 debrief meeting in Kansas City, MO 4. Subcommittee charter 5. Topics for call for papers & presentations 6. List of who receives the e-blast call for papers & presentations 7. Ideas for National Transit Institute courses to offer at the conference 8. 2014 Bus & Paratransit Conference session attendance 9. 2014 conference evaluation survey summary 10. All abstracts organized by route of study Thank you! A T T A C H M E N T 1 AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION MAY 3-6, 2015 BUS & PARATRANSIT CONFERENCE OVERVIEW OMNI FORT WORTH HOTEL, 1300 HOUSTON ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76102 (817) 535-6664 & FORT WORTH CONVENTION CENTER, HOUSTON ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76102 As of August 21, 2014 SAT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio Motor Vehicle Industry
    Research Office A State Affiliate of the U.S. Census Bureau The Ohio Motor Vehicle Report February 2019 Intentionally blank THE OHIO MOTOR VEHICLE INDUSTRY FEBRUARY 2019 B1002: Don Larrick, Principal Analyst Office of Research, Ohio Development Services Agency PO Box 1001, Columbus, Oh. 43216-1001 Production Support: Steven Kelley, Editor; Jim Kell, Contributor Robert Schmidley, GIS Specialist TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 1 Description of Ohio’s Motor Vehicle Industry 4 The Motor Vehicle Industry’s Impact on Ohio’s Economy 5 Ohio’s Strategic Position in Motor Vehicle Assembly 7 Notable Motor Vehicle Industry Manufacturers in Ohio 10 Recent Expansion and Attraction Announcements 16 The Concentration of the Industry in Ohio: Gross Domestic Product and Value-Added 18 Company Summaries of Light Vehicle Production in Ohio 20 Parts Suppliers 24 The Composition of Ohio’s Motor Vehicle Industry – Employment at the Plants 28 Industry Wages 30 The Distribution of Industry Establishments Across Ohio 32 The Distribution of Industry Employment Across Ohio 34 Foreign Investment in Ohio 35 Trends 40 Employment 42 i Gross Domestic Product 44 Value-Added by Ohio’s Motor Vehicle Industry 46 Light Vehicle Production in Ohio and the U.S. 48 Capital Expenditures for Ohio’s Motor Vehicle Industry 50 Establishments 52 Output, Employment and Productivity 54 U.S. Industry Analysis and Outlook 56 Market Share Trends 58 Trade Balances 62 Industry Operations and Recent Trends 65 Technologies for Production Processes and Vehicles 69 The Transportation Research Center 75 The Near- and Longer-Term Outlooks 78 About the Bodies-and-Trailers Group 82 Assembler Profiles 84 Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV 86 Ford Motor Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Make, Vehicle Model
    V8, V9 VEHICLE MAKE, VEHICLE MODEL Format: VEHICLE MAKE – 2 numeric VEHICLE MODEL – 3 numeric Element Values: MAKE: Blanks 01-03, 06-10, 12-14, 18-25, 29-65, 69-77, 80-89, 90-94, 98-99 MODEL: Blanks 001-999 Remarks: SEE REMARKS UNDER VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER – V12 2009 181 ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF MAKES FARS MAKE MAKE/ NCIC FARS MAKE MAKE/ NCIC MAKE MODEL CODE* MAKE MODEL CODE* CODE TABLE CODE TABLE PAGE # PAGE # 54 Acura 187 (ACUR) 71 Ducati 253 (DUCA) 31 Alfa Romeo 187 (ALFA) 10 Eagle 205 (EGIL) 03 AM General 188 (AMGN) 91 Eagle Coach 267 01 American Motors 189 (AMER) 29-398 Excaliber 250 (EXCL) 69-031 Aston Martin 250 (ASTO) 69-035 Ferrari 251 (FERR) 32 Audi 190 (AUDI) 36 Fiat 205 (FIAT) 33 Austin/Austin 191 (AUST) 12 Ford 206 (FORD) Healey 82 Freightliner 259 (FRHT) 29-001 Avanti 250 (AVTI) 83 FWD 260 (FWD) 98-802 Auto-Union-DKW 269 (AUTU) 69-398 Gazelle 252 (GZL) 69-042 Bentley 251 (BENT) 92 Gillig 268 69-052 Bertone 251 (BERO) 23 GMC 210 (GMC) 90 Bluebird 267 (BLUI) 25 Grumman 212 (GRUM) 34 BMW 191 (BMW) 72 Harley- 253 (HD) 69-032 Bricklin 250 (BRIC) Davidson 80 Brockway 257 (BROC) 69-036 Hillman 251 (HILL) 70 BSA 253 (BSA) 98-806 Hino 270 (HINO) 18 Buick 193 (BUIC) 37 Honda 213 (HOND) 19 Cadillac 194 (CADI) 29-398 Hudson 250 (HUDS) 98-903 Carpenter 270 55 Hyundai 215 (HYUN) 29-002 Checker 250 (CHEC) 08 Imperial 216 (CHRY) 20 Chevrolet 195 (CHEV) 58 Infiniti 216 (INFI) 06 Chrysler 199 (CHRY) 84 International 261 (INTL) 69-033 Citroen 250 (CITR) Harvester 98-904 Collins Bus 270 38 Isuzu 217 (ISU ) 64 Daewoo 201 (DAEW) 88 Iveco/Magirus
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS MAILERS REVIEW Monitoring the Postal Service, Private Carriers and Suppliers Published by PNMSI Publishing Co
    BUSINESS MAILERS REVIEW Monitoring the Postal Service, Private Carriers and Suppliers Published by PNMSI Publishing Co. Volume 38, Number 21 October 23, 2017 USPS Seeks 2018 Price Increase USPS filed a case earlier this month with the As in the past, the Postal Service will not include Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) for a proposed any surcharges for fuel, residential delivery, or regular price adjustment for all classes of mail. This price Saturday delivery. adjustment, if approved by the PRC, will be effective on Jan. 21, 2018. Non-Competitive Products Price adjustments for Non-Competitive Products as an overall percentage basis by mail class average about 1.9%. Individual price categories within each class of mail listed below will have varying percentage increases, some greater than the overall percentage increase. In fact, some price categories will actually see a decrease in pricing. The new prices, if approved, include a one cent increase in the price of a First-Class Mail Forever stamp from 49 cents to 50 cents. Postcard stamps and metered letters would also have a one cent increase. The USPS filing does not include any price change for single-piece letters being mailed to international destinations or for additional ounces for letters. Competitive Products In contrast, prices for Competitive Products and services will increase by about 4%. The USPS requested an overall 3.9% increase for Priority Mail Express. Retail prices will increase an average of 3.9%, while Commer- cial Base prices increase an average of 3.7% and Com- While Mailing Services price increases are mercial Plus by 3.7%.
    [Show full text]