Cape May National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cape May National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction and Background The Purpose of and Need for Action ..........................................................................1 Cape May Refuge ........................................................................................1 Two Mile Beach Unit......................................................................................3 Purposes of Cape May Refuge...............................................................................3 Refuge Vision ...........................................................................................3 National and Regional Mandates.............................................................................5 Other Legal and Policy Mandates ............................................................................6 Relevant Ecosystem and Species Recovery Plans.................................................................8 Chapter 2. Planning Process The Comprehensive Conservation Planning Process .............................................................11 Planning Issues.........................................................................................13 Issues Outside the Scope of the CCP/EA ......................................................................17 Chapter 3. Summary Refuge and Resource Descriptions Cape May Refuge Physical Environment ................................................................................19 Biological Environment ...............................................................................20 Archaeological and Historical Environment ................................................................23 Socioeconomic Environment...........................................................................24 Two Mile Beach Unit Physical Environment ................................................................................24 Biological Environment ...............................................................................25 Archaeological and Historical Environment ................................................................26 Socioeconomic Environment...........................................................................26 Chapter 4. Management Direction Refuge Management Policies and Guidelines...................................................................27 The Comprehensive Conservation Plan Cape May Refuge ...................................................................................31 Goal 1. Protect and enhance Federal trust resources and other species and habitats of special concern. ....................................................................... 31 Goal 2. Maintain and/or restore natural ecological communities to promote healthy, functioning ecosystems.................................................................. 33 Goal 3. Establish a land protection program to support species, habitat and ecosystem goals................... 36 Goal 4. Provide opportunities for high-quality compatible, wildlife-dependent public use....................... 36 Two Mile Beach Unit.................................................................................39 Goal 1. Protect and enhance Federal trust resources and other species and habitats of special concern. ....................................................................... 40 Goal 2. Maintain and/or restore natural ecological communities to promote healthy, functioning ecosystems.................................................................. 40 Goal 3. Establish a land protection program to support species, habitat and ecosystem goals................... 41 Goal 4. Provide opportunities for high-quality compatible, wildlife-dependent public use....................... 41 Chapter 5. Implementation and Monitoring Funding and Staffing ..................................................................... 57 Step-down Management Plans.............................................................................58 Monitoring and Adaptive Management.......................................................................58 Plan Amendment and Revision .............................................................................59 Appendices Appendix A. Relevant Legal Mandates and Land Acquisition Legislation .............................................61 Appendix B. Summary of Public Comments Received on the Draft CCP/EA and Their Disposition...........................69 Appendix C. Summary of Public Comments Received on the Revised Draft CCP/EA and Their Disposition ....................73 Appendix D. Finding of No Significant Impact..................................................................81 Appendix E. Species and Communities of Special Emphasis in the New Jersey Coast Landscape ..........................83 Appendix F. Pre-acquisition Compatibility Determination........................................................105 Appendix G. Ecosystem Services and Functions...............................................................107 Appendix H. Refuge Operating Needs System (RONS) Project List .................................................109 Appendix I. Maintenance Management System (MMS) Project List ................................................113 Appendix J. Glossary...................................................................................117 Appendix K. Works Cited ................................................................................129 Appendix L. List of Preparers .............................................................................133 Appendix M. Land Protection Plan..........................................................................135 Maps Map 1. Cape May National Wildlife Refuge...................................................................2 Map 2. Two Mile Beach Unit of Cape May National Wildlife Refuge ................................................4 Map 3a. Refuge Expansion Areas. .........................................................................43 Map 3b. Refuge Expansion Areas. .........................................................................44 Map 4. Trapping. .....................................................................................45 Map 5a. Habitat Management.............................................................................46 Map 5b. Habitat Management.............................................................................47 Map 6a. Big Game Hunting. ............................................................................48 Map 6b. Big Game Hunting...............................................................................49 Map 7a. Upland Game Hunting............................................................................50 Map 7b. Upland Game Hunting............................................................................51 Map 8a. Migratory Game Bird Hunting. .....................................................................52 Map 8b. Migratory Game Bird Hunting. .....................................................................53 Map 9a. Wildlife Observation and Interpretation. ..............................................................54 Map 9b. Wildlife Observation and Interpretation. ..............................................................55 List of Figures and Tables Figure 1. The Comprehensive Conservation Planning Process and NEPA Compliance ...................................14 Table 1. Pre-acquisition Compatibility for Wildlife-dependent Recreational Activities at Cape May Refuge ...................28 Figure 2. Staffing Plan for Cape May Refuge...................................................................57 Chapter 1. Introduction and Background The Purpose of and Need for Action Development of a Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) is vital to the future management of Cape May National Wildlife Refuge (Cape May Refuge) and it's new Two Mile Beach Unit. The purpose of the CCP is to provide strategic management direction over the next 15 years by: • Providing a clear statement of desired future conditions for habitat, wildlife, visitor services, and facilities; • Providing a clear understanding of the reasons for management actions; • Ensuring Refuge management reflects the policies and goals of the National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System) and our other legal mandates; • Ensuring the compatibility of current and future public use; e. Providing long-term continuity and direction for Refuge management; f. Providing direction for staffing, operations, maintenance, and the development of budget requests. The need to develop a CCP is two-fold. First, the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (Refuge Improvement Act) requires that all National Wildlife Refuges have a CCP in place within 15 years to help fulfill the new mission of the Refuge System. Second, there is currently no master plan establishing priorities and ensuring consistent and integrated management for Cape May Refuge. A vision statement and goals, objectives, and management strategies are needed to effectively manage natural resources. Persistent issues related to non-wildlife dependent public use, beach access, wilderness management, and management for threatened and endangered species must be resolved with public and partner involvement. Cape May Refuge Cape May Refuge is located in Cape May County, and includes the Delaware Bay Division, the Great Cedar Swamp Division, and the Two Mile Beach Unit. (See Map 1.) The Refuge was established in 1989. The approved acquisition
Recommended publications
  • Duponchel, 1827
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY POLSKIE P I S M O ENTOMOLOGICZNE VOL. 79 : 77-80 Bydgoszcz 30 March 2010 Callopistria latreillei (DUPONCHEL , 1827) new for Ukraine fauna and several rare species of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) JANUSZ NOWACKI *, ROMAN BIDYCHAK **, KRZYSZTOF PAŁKA *** * Department of Environmental Protection, Pozna ń University of Life Sciences, D ąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Pozna ń, Poland ** Department of Biology and Ecology, Vassyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National Univer- sity, Shevchenko st. 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, *** Institute of Biology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland ABSTRACT. The study presents the first localities of Callopistria latreillei (DUP .), a new species for Ukraine fauna. The species was found in the Zakarpatie in south-western Ukraine. Also the localities for 2 rare noctuid moths species for Ukrainie are given. That was the first time those spe- cies were reported from Zakarpatie. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, faunistics, new records, Ukraine. INTRODUCTION The genus Callopistria HÜBNER , [1821], includes about 120 species (POOLE 1989), out of which 26 species occur in the Palearctic. Only 2 species of the genus have been found in Europe so far (FIBIGER & HACKER 2007), and one of them has been reported from Ukraine (KLJUCHKO 2006). During field study of noctuid moths in south-western Ukraine in Zakarpatie Callopis- tria latreillei (DUPONCHEL , 1827) was first reported from Ukraine (Fig. 1). - Ukraine, Zakarpatie, Vynohradiv: in two localities on the slopes of Chorna Hora: 28 July 2009, 1 ex. was caught on light in dry sward of forest-steppe nature on the southern slope of Chorna Hora; 16 September 2009, 1 ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Associations Between Pteridophytes and Arthropods
    FERN GAZ. 12(1) 1979 29 THE ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN PTERIDOPHYTES AND ARTHROPODS URI GERSON The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel. ABSTRACT Insects belonging to 12 orders, as well as mites, millipedes, woodlice and tardigrades have been collected from Pterldophyta. Primitive and modern, as well as general and specialist arthropods feed on pteridophytes. Insects and mites may cause slight to severe damage, all plant parts being susceptible. Several arthropods are pests of commercial Pteridophyta, their control being difficult due to the plants' sensitivity to pesticides. Efforts are currently underway to employ insects for the biological control of bracken and water ferns. Although Pteridophyta are believed to be relatively resistant to arthropods, the evidence is inconclusive; pteridophyte phytoecdysones do not appear to inhibit insect feeders. Other secondary compounds of preridophytes, like prunasine, may have a more important role in protecting bracken from herbivores. Several chemicals capable of adversely affecting insects have been extracted from Pteridophyta. The litter of pteridophytes provides a humid habitat for various parasitic arthropods, like the sheep tick. Ants often abound on pteridophytes (especially in the tropics) and may help in protecting these plants while nesting therein. These and other associations are discussed . lt is tenatively suggested that there might be a difference in the spectrum of arthropods attacking ancient as compared to modern Pteridophyta. The Osmundales, which, in contrast to other ancient pteridophytes, contain large amounts of ·phytoecdysones, are more similar to modern Pteridophyta in regard to their arthropod associates. The need for further comparative studies is advocated, with special emphasis on the tropics.
    [Show full text]
  • Far Eastern Entomologist Number 429: 8-11 April 2021
    Far Eastern Entomologist ISSN 1026-051X (print edition) Number 429: 8-11 ISSN 2713-2196 (online edition) April 2021 https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.429.2 http://zoobank.org/References/36A71DD0-FE2B-4D2B-BBEC-9BA2C73FA989 FIRST RECORD OF NOCTUID MOTH CALLOPISTRIA AETHIOPS BUTLER, 1878 (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) FROM SOUTHERN PRIMORYE AS AN EXAMPLE OF THE EAST ASIAN SPECIES PENETRATING IN RUSSIAN FAUNA V. V. Dubatolov1, 2) 1) Federal State Institution "Zapovednoe Priamurye", Yubileinaya street, 8, Bychikha village, Khabarovskii Krai, 680502, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2) Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze str. 11, Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia. Summary. An East Asian-Oriental noctuid species Callopistria aethiops Butler, 1878 is recorded from Russia for the first time. The trend of invasions of the southern Macroheterocera species into the Russian Far East has existed at least during last century but is noticeably increased during last 20 years. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, fauna, new record, invasion, Primorskii Krai, Russia. В. В. Дубатолов. Первая находка совки Callopistria aethiops Butler, 1878 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) в Южном Приморье как пример внедрения восточноазиатских видов в фауну России // Дальневосточный энтомолог. 2021. N 429. С. 8-11. Резюме. Восточноазиатско-ориентальная совка Callopistria aethiops Butler, 1878 впервые найдена в России. Показано, что тенденция проникновения южных видов макрочешуекрылых на Дальний Восток России отмечена, по крайней мере, в течение ста лет, но наиболее ярко она выражена в последние два десятилетия. INTRODUCTION During an excursion to Vitjaz Bay (Khasan District in Primorskii Krai) in September 2020, a new for Russian fauna noctuid moth was collected among other 73 late summer and autumn Macroheterocera species.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Knowledge of the Lepidoptera Fauna of Albania. 1
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 1995 Band/Volume: 26 Autor(en)/Author(s): Beshkov Stoyan V., Misja Kastriot Artikel/Article: A Contribution to the knowledge of the Lepidoptera fauna of Albania. 1. Some materials from the collection of K. Misja in the Natural History Museum Tirana and some results of the collecting trip of Beshkov during 1992 (Lepidoptera, Macrolepidoptera) 345-363 ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at _________Atalanta (June 1995) 26(1/2): 345-363, Wurzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 _________ A Contribution to the knowledge of the Lepidoptera fauna of Albania. 1. Some materials from the collection of K. M is ja in the Natural History Museum Tirana and some results of the collecting trip of B e s h k o v during 1992 (Lepidoptera, Macrolepidoptera) by S toyan B e s h k o v & K a s t r io t M isja received 10.11.1994 Abstract: The present work is the result of a critical study on the collection of Lepidoptera of Prof. Dr. Kastriot Misja in the Natural History Museum Tirana, and forms part of the results of Stoyan B eshkov 's collecting trip in June 1992 in Northern and Southern Albania. The occurrence of each of the mentioned species is given for Albania, following all the literature known by the authors. Illustrations of the male or female genitalia for some previously wrong­ ly determined or published species are given. The number of the new genera for Albania is 11, the number of the new species for Albania is 23, and the number of the new subspecies for the country is 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Siloam Springs State Park
    SILOAM SPRINGS STATE PARK ADAMS / BROWN COUNTIES, ILLINOIS AN INSECT SURVEY FOR ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FUNDED BY THE SMALL GAME GRANT FY1999 JUNE, 2000 A report of research by VERNON L. LA GESSE And JAMES R.WIKER Adjunct Research Associates Zoology Department Illinois State Museum Springfield, Illinois 217-525-1410 [email protected] I Siloam Springs State Park, Adams/Brown County, Illinois Insect Survey 1997-2000 Introduction Approximately 2000 species of Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) occur in Illinois. These species are important to the ecosystem because of their association with the flora of this area. The larval stages are primary plant consumers, and the adult forms are pollinators. In addition, they are a common food resource for many species of birds, mammals and other arthropods. Many species, especially those restricted by host plant requirements, serve as indirect indicators of habitat quality (LaGesse et al. 1996). With the current interest in land management and maintaining plant and animal diversity, a formal insect survey was conducted . During the growing season of 1997 through 1999, 15 diurnal and 9 nocturnal surveys for Lepidoptera were performed over a three-year period by the senior author. Materials and Methods Prairies (mesic to dry), oak- hickory woodlands, oak barrens stream/creek edges and the lake communities were sampled at Siloam Springs State Park . Insects were sampled by various methods. Sampling included capture and release of species easily identified and preservation of voucher representatives to confirm identification of species . All voucher specimens will be deposited with the author's collection or the Illinois State Museum (ISM), Springfield, Illinois .
    [Show full text]
  • Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory
    Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory New York Natural Heritage Program Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory Established in 1985, the New York Natural Heritage NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an Program (NYNHP) is a program of the State University of online tool for invasive species reporting and data New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry management. (SUNY ESF). Our mission is to facilitate conservation of NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable rare animals, rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We online resources: Conservation Guides include the accomplish this mission by combining thorough field biology, identification, habitat, and management of many inventories, scientific analyses, expert interpretation, and the of New York’s rare species and natural community most comprehensive database on New York's distinctive types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and biodiversity to deliver the highest quality information for communities in a specified area of interest. natural resource planning, protection, and management. The program is an active participant in the The Program is funded by grants and contracts from NatureServe Network – an international network of government agencies whose missions involve natural biodiversity data centers overseen by a Washington D.C. resource management, private organizations involved in based non-profit organization. There are currently land protection and stewardship, and both government and Natural Heritage Programs or Conservation Data private organizations interested in advancing the Centers in all 50 states and several interstate regions. conservation of biodiversity. There are also 10 programs in Canada, and many NY Natural Heritage is housed within NYS DEC’s participating organizations across 12 Latin and South Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity RECOVERY PLAN
    Biodiversity RECOVERY PLAN Final Draft for Public Review September 1999 Preface This plan is the result of efforts by more than 200 people Larry Christmas of NIPC created the first integrated draft who participated in preparing background papers and in of the plan. Barbara Hill served as technical editor. workshops to address scientific and policy issues. These Special recognition is due to Elizabeth McCance and Tim have included taxonomic workshops that focused on Sullivan for their tireless work in organizing the many groups of species (mammals, birds, amphibians, etc.) and science workshops and the resulting work products. ecosystem types (forests, prairies, wetlands, etc.) The Also, recognition is due to Wayne Schennum of the plan has also been shaped by the work of the various McHenry Conservation District for his valuable contri- Chicago Wilderness Teams (Science, Land Management, butions to virtually all of the science workshops together Education and Communications, and Policy and Strat- with his integrative perspective. egy), as well as a wide variety of other workshops includ- ing the recovery plan review session during the 1999 Initial funding for development of the recovery plan Chicago Wilderness Congress. was provided through grants from the U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency. Additional funding was pro- While no portion of the plan is the product of any one vided by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, person, members of the Recovery Plan Task Force served the U.S. Forest Service, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife as editor/writers for one or more chapters or major chap- Service. Matching funds were provided by the Illinois ter segments.
    [Show full text]
  • Predator to Prey to Poop: Bats As Microbial Hosts and Insectivorous Hunters
    Predator to Prey to Poop: Bats as Microbial Hosts and Insectivorous Hunters A Thesis SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Miranda Galey IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE Dr. Ron Moen, Dr. Jessica R. Sieber September 2020 Copyright © Miranda Galey 2020 Abstract Bat fecal samples are a rich source of ecological data for bat biologists, entomologists, and microbiologists. Feces collected from individual bats can be used to profile the gut microbiome using microbial DNA and to understand bat foraging strategies using arthropod DNA. We used eDNA collected from bat fecal samples to better understand bats as predators in the context of their unique gut physiology. We used high through- put sequencing of the COI gene and 16S rRNA gene to determine the diet composition and gut microbiome composition of three bat species in Minnesota: Eptesicus fuscus, Myotis lucifugus and M. septentrionalis. In our analysis of insect prey, we found that E. fuscus consistently foraged for a higher diversity of beetle species compared to other insects. We found that the proportional frequency of tympanate samples from M. septentrionalis and M. lucifugus was similar, while M. septentrionalis consistently preyed more often upon non-flying species. We used the same set of COI sequences to determine presence of pest species, rare species, and insects not previously observed in Minnesota. We were able to combine precise arthropod identification and the for- aging areas of individually sampled bats to observe possible range expansion of some insects. The taxonomic composition of the bat gut microbiome in all three species was found to be consistent with the composition of a mammalian small intestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Callopistria Juventina (Stoll, 1782) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Wieder Ein Bemerkenswerter Fund Im NSG Tennenloher Forst Bei Erlangen/Mfr
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Galathea, Berichte des Kreises Nürnberger Entomologen e.V. Jahr/Year: 2014 Band/Volume: 30 Autor(en)/Author(s): Tannert Rudi [Rudolf] Artikel/Article: Callopistria juventina (Stoll, 1782) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Wieder ein bemerkenswerter Fund im NSG Tennenloher Forst bei Erlangen/Mfr. 62- 64 ©Kreis Nürnberger Entomologen; download unter www.zobodat.at gal athea Band 30 • Beiträge des Kreises Nürnberger Entomologen •2014 • S. 62-64 Callopistria juventina (Stoll, 1782) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Wieder ein bemerkenswerter Fund im NSG Tennenloher Forst bei Erlangen/Mfr. RUDI TANNERT Zusammenfassung Berichtet wird über einen Wiederfund der Adlerfarneule Callopistria juventina (Stoll, 1782). Letzte bekannte Meldungen liegen Jahrzehnte zurück. Zumindest zum Zeitpunkt der Erstellung der "Rote Liste Bayern von 2003" galt die Art für Bayern aus ausgestor- ben oder verschollen. Summary The last report of the "bracken-moth" Callopistria juventina (Stoll, 1782) dates back several decades. So this species was taken as "extinct" (category 0) in the Red Data List of Bavaria (2003). Die Insektenerfassungen bis zum Jahre 2003 im früheren US-Truppenübungsplatz Tennenlohe bei Erlangen und jetzigem Naturschutzgebiet Tennenloher Forst bei Erlan- gen wurden in der Zeitschrift galathea Band 20 (2004), Hefte 3 und 4 publiziert. Neben den Auflistungen und Kommentaren zu ausgesuchten Arten wurden auch die verschie- denen Lebensräume beschrieben. In Band 29 (2013) wurde die Beobachtung der Noctuidae Chrysodeixis chalcites (Esper, 1789) und die Gründe des Auftauchens der Art wie Einwanderung, Arealerweiterung und das Einschleppen mit importierten Pflanzen diskutiert. Nun wurden anläßlich einer nächtlichen Excursion am 18. Juli 2014 zusammen mit mei- nem Freund Konrad Loos aus Neualbenreuth/Opf.
    [Show full text]