DOCSLIB.ORG

Fort Clinch State Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fort Clinch State Park Fort Clinch State Park Approved Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 8 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 8 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ..............................................................................9 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 12 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 12 Topography .................................................................................. 12 Geology ....................................................................................... 20 Soils ............................................................................................ 20 Minerals ....................................................................................... 24 Hydrology .................................................................................... 24 Natural Communities (FNAI) ........................................................... 30 Imperiled Species ......................................................................... 44 Exotic and Nuisance Species ........................................................... 51 Special Natural Features ................................................................ 54 Cultural Resources ............................................................................ 54 Condition Assessment .................................................................... 55 Level of Significance ...................................................................... 55 Prehistoric and Historic Archaeological Sites ..................................... 56 Historic Structures ........................................................................ 57 Collections ................................................................................... 61 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ................................................. 66 Management Goals, Objectives and Actions .......................................... 66 Natural Resource Management ........................................................... 66 Hydrological Management .............................................................. 66 Natural Communities Management .................................................. 69 Imperiled Species Management ...................................................... 73 Exotic Species Management ........................................................... 75 Cultural Resource Management .......................................................... 77 Special Management Considerations .................................................... 79 Timber Management Analysis ......................................................... 79 Coastal/Beach Management ........................................................... 80 Arthropod Control Plan ................................................................... 84 Sea Level Rise .............................................................................. 84 Resource Management Schedule ......................................................... 85 Land Management Review ................................................................. 85 i LAND USE COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 87 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS .................................................................... 87 Existing Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 89 Planned Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 89 PROPERTY ANALYSIS ........................................................................ 89 Recreational Resource Elements ......................................................... 90 Land Area .................................................................................... 90 Water Area ................................................................................... 90 Shoreline ..................................................................................... 90 Natural Scenery ............................................................................ 90 Significant Habitat ......................................................................... 91 Natural Features ........................................................................... 91 Archaeological and Historic Features ................................................ 91 Assessment of Use ............................................................................ 91 Past Uses ..................................................................................... 92 Future Land Use and Zoning ........................................................... 92 Current Recreational Use and Visitor Programs ................................. 92 Other Uses ................................................................................... 93 Protected Zones ............................................................................ 93 Existing Facilities .............................................................................. 93 Recreation Facilities ....................................................................... 93 Support Facilities .......................................................................... 94 CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN ........................................................... 99 Potential Uses .................................................................................. 99 Public Access and Recreational Opportunities .................................... 99 Proposed Facilities .......................................................................... 101 Capital Facilities and Infrastructure ............................................... 101 Facilities Development ..................................................................... 103 Recreational Carrying Capacity ......................................................... 104 Optimum Boundary ......................................................................... 107 IMPLEMENTATION COMPONENT MANAGEMENT PROGRESS ................................................................ 111 Acquisition ..................................................................................... 111 Park Administration and Operations .................................................. 111 Resource Management .................................................................... 113 Natural Resources ................................................................... 113 Cultural Resources ................................................................... 114 Recreation and Visitor Services ..................................................... 115 Park Facilities ................................................................................. 116 MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION .......................................... 117 ii TABLES TABLE 1 – Fort Clinch State Park Management Zones .............................. 12 TABLE 2 – Imperiled Species Inventory .................................................. 47 TABLE 3 – Inventory of FLEPPC Category I and II Exotic Plant Species ....... 52 TABLE 4 – Cultural Sites Listed in the Florida Master Site File ................... 63 TABLE 5 – Recreational Carrying Capacity ............................................ 107 TABLE 6 – Implementation Schedule and Cost Estimates................. 119-122 MAPS Vicinity Map ...........................................................................................3 Reference Map .......................................................................................5 Management Zones Map........................................................................ 13 Topographic Map .................................................................................. 17 Soils Map ............................................................................................ 21 Natural Communities Map ...................................................................... 31 Desired Future Conditions Map ............................................................... 71 Base Map ...................................................................................... 95, 97 Conceptual Land Use Plan .................................................................... 105 Optimum Boundary Map ...................................................................... 109 LIST OF ADDENDA ADDENDUM 1 Acquisition History ....................................................................... A 1 - 1 ADDENDUM 2 Advisory Group Members and Report ............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The News Journal of the Dragonfly
    ISSN 1061-8503 TheA News Journalrgia of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas Volume 26 15 September 2014 Number 3 Published by the Dragonfly Society of the Americas http://www.DragonflySocietyAmericas.org/ ARGIA Vol. 26, No. 3, 15 September 2014 25th Annual Meeting of the DSA in Northern Wisconsin, by Robert DuBois ........................................................1 Calendar of Events ......................................................................................................................................................1 Minutes of the 2014 DSA Annual Meeting , by Steve Valley .....................................................................................5 Call for Papers for BAO ..............................................................................................................................................8 Epitheca semiaquaea (Mantled Baskettail) Confirmed for New Hampshire, by Paul Bedell .....................................9 Don't Forget to Renew Your DSA Membership for 2015! .........................................................................................9 Advice Column............................................................................................................................................................9 The Reappearance of Black-winged Dragonlet (Erythrodiplax funerea) in Arizona, by Douglas Danforth and Rich Bailowitz .........................................................................................................10 Celithemis bertha (Red-veined Pennant),
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bees Are Back in Town
    Cindy Bennington & Peter May Volusia Sandhill can be compared to the Biology︱ pollinators visiting the sandhills of Heart Island Conservation Area to determine if the same number and species of pollinators are present in the urban ecosystem as in the larger natural area. Acmaeodera sp. (Family Buprestidae; the Agapostemon splendens (Family Halictidae - metallic wood-boring beetles). the halictid or sweat bees). PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS The bees are back Chauliognathus sp. (Family Cantharidae - the The pollinators we are most familiar with soldier beetles) - Leatherwing Beetle. are bees, though other insects including wasps, butterflies, beetles, and flies are also common pollinators. Insects visit the flowers to access the nectar and pollen in town as a food source, and in the process Pollinators in an urban ecosystem carry pollen between plants. Some plants, referred to as ‘specialists’, are only pollinated by one group of insects (for The growing urbanisation of ollinators are any animals (usually Stetson University researchers Professor example, they may only attract flies, or the landscape poses a major insects) that transfer pollen Cindy Bennington and Professor Peter have the pollen situated such that only threat to insect pollinators. The from one flower to another, and May investigate the pollinators visiting bees can collect it), and others may be P Strymon melinus (Family Lycaenidae - the reduction in number of these without them around 75% of flowering a small restoration area in an urban ‘generalists’, meaning that any insect that hairstreaks) - Red-banded Hairstreak. insects, especially bee species, plants would be unable to reproduce – ecosystem to compare how the numbers visits the flower can collect or deposit could have a severe impact on including many species that we rely on and species of insects present compare pollen.
    [Show full text]
  • Heathland 700 the Park & Poor's Allotment Species List
    The Park & Poor's Allotment Bioblitz 25th - 26th July 2015 Common Name Scientific Name [if known] Site recorded Fungus Xylaria polymorpha Dead Man's Fingers Both Amanita excelsa var. excelsa Grey Spotted Amanita Poor's Allotment Panaeolus sp. Poor's Allotment Phallus impudicus var. impudicus Stinkhorn The Park Mosses Sphagnum denticulatum Cow-horn Bog-moss Both Sphagnum fimbriatum Fringed Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum papillosum Papillose Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum squarrosum Spiky Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum palustre Blunt-leaved Bog-moss Poor's Allotment Atrichum undulatum Common Smoothcap Both Polytrichum commune Common Haircap The Park Polytrichum formosum Bank Haircap Both Polytrichum juniperinum Juniper Haircap The Park Tetraphis pellucida Pellucid Four-tooth Moss The Park Schistidium crassipilum Thickpoint Grimmia Poor's Allotment Fissidens taxifolius Common Pocket-moss The Park Ceratodon purpureus Redshank The Park Dicranoweisia cirrata Common Pincushion Both Dicranella heteromalla Silky Forklet-moss Both Dicranella varia Variable Forklet-moss The Park Dicranum scoparium Broom Fork-moss Both Campylopus flexuosus Rusty Swan-neck Moss Poor's Allotment Campylopus introflexus Heath Star Moss Both Campylopus pyriformis Dwarf Swan-neck Moss The Park Bryoerythrophyllum Red Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Barbula convoluta Lesser Bird's-claw Beard-moss The Park Didymodon fallax Fallacious Beard-moss The Park Didymodon insulanus Cylindric Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Zygodon conoideus Lesser Yoke-moss The Park Zygodon viridissimus Green Yoke-moss
    [Show full text]
  • Duponchel, 1827
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY POLSKIE P I S M O ENTOMOLOGICZNE VOL. 79 : 77-80 Bydgoszcz 30 March 2010 Callopistria latreillei (DUPONCHEL , 1827) new for Ukraine fauna and several rare species of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) JANUSZ NOWACKI *, ROMAN BIDYCHAK **, KRZYSZTOF PAŁKA *** * Department of Environmental Protection, Pozna ń University of Life Sciences, D ąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Pozna ń, Poland ** Department of Biology and Ecology, Vassyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National Univer- sity, Shevchenko st. 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, *** Institute of Biology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland ABSTRACT. The study presents the first localities of Callopistria latreillei (DUP .), a new species for Ukraine fauna. The species was found in the Zakarpatie in south-western Ukraine. Also the localities for 2 rare noctuid moths species for Ukrainie are given. That was the first time those spe- cies were reported from Zakarpatie. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, faunistics, new records, Ukraine. INTRODUCTION The genus Callopistria HÜBNER , [1821], includes about 120 species (POOLE 1989), out of which 26 species occur in the Palearctic. Only 2 species of the genus have been found in Europe so far (FIBIGER & HACKER 2007), and one of them has been reported from Ukraine (KLJUCHKO 2006). During field study of noctuid moths in south-western Ukraine in Zakarpatie Callopis- tria latreillei (DUPONCHEL , 1827) was first reported from Ukraine (Fig. 1). - Ukraine, Zakarpatie, Vynohradiv: in two localities on the slopes of Chorna Hora: 28 July 2009, 1 ex. was caught on light in dry sward of forest-steppe nature on the southern slope of Chorna Hora; 16 September 2009, 1 ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    FLORIDA Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan SEPTEMBER 2008 (Originally submitted October 2006) Prepared by: Florida Coastal Management Program In cooperation with: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of State Lands Office of Coastal and Aquatic Managed Areas Florida Natural Areas Inventory ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many state partners and individuals assisted the Florida Coastal Management Program in developing the Florida Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan. The Florida Coastal Management Program would like to extend special thanks to the following for their assistance and support in developing this plan: From the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of State Lands O. Greg Brock, Donna Jones Ruffner and Ellen Stere From the Florida Natural Areas Inventory Gary Knight and Ann F. Johnson The Florida Coastal Management Program 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. MS #47 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Coastal Program URL: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/mainpage/programs/cmp.htm Development of this plan was supported with funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management under Section 306 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. Florida Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan Overview of conservation lands in the State of Florida ii Florida Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 a. Background
    [Show full text]
  • Mxeuicanjuseum PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y
    1ovitatesMXeuicanJuseum PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 2020 OCTOBER 14, 1960 The Odonata of the Bahama Islands, the West Indies BY MINTER J. WESTFALL, JR.' Through the courtesy of Dr. Mont A. Cazier of the American Museum of Natural History, I have had the privilege of studying a collection of 439 specimens of Odonata from the Bahama Islands. The number of species represented in this collection is not large, and no species new to science has been recognized, but relatively few records are found in the literature for these islands. Much collecting has been done in the Greater Antilles, and they were included in the range covered by the recent "Manual of the Dragonflies (Anisoptera) of North America" by James G. Needham and myself. Elsie B. Klots (1932) presented an excellent contribution on the Odonata of Puerto Rico, including records from the other Antilles, but no similar work has been done for the Bahamas. Klots had begun a preliminary investi- gation of the Bimini material but was unable to pursue the study, so that the entire lot was sent to me. A large number of specimens reported in the present paper were taken between December 31, 1952, and May 13, 1953, by the following members of the Van Voast-American Museum of Natural History Expedition to the Bahama Islands: G. B. Rabb, Ellis B. Hayden, Jr., and L. Giovannoli. The expedition took them to many of the islands from Grand Bahama Island and the Abaco Cays in the north to Great Inagua Island and the Turks Islands in the south.
    [Show full text]
  • "Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at Its Meeting Held on ______2007, Enacted This
    In accordance with Article 6 paragraph 3 of the FT Law ("Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at its meeting held on ____________ 2007, enacted this DECISION ON CONTROL LIST FOR EXPORT, IMPORT AND TRANSIT OF GOODS Article 1 The goods that are being exported, imported and goods in transit procedure, shall be classified into the forms of export, import and transit, specifically: free export, import and transit and export, import and transit based on a license. The goods referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article were identified in the Control List for Export, Import and Transit of Goods that has been printed together with this Decision and constitutes an integral part hereof (Exhibit 1). Article 2 In the Control List, the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license, were designated by the abbreviation: “D”, and automatic license were designated by abbreviation “AD”. The goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license designated by the abbreviation “D” and specific number, license is issued by following state authorities: - D1: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for protection of human health - D2: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for animal and plant health protection, if goods are imported, exported or in transit for veterinary or phyto-sanitary purposes - D3: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for environment protection - D4: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Eared Owl Asio Otus Breeding in a Caspian Gull Larus Cachinnans
    ORNIS SVECICA 30: 73–78, 2020 | DOI: 10.34080/OS.V30.22033 SHORT COMMUNICATION Received 31 August 2020 | Revised 12 November 2020 | Accepted 24 November 2020 | Published 31 December 2020 Editor: Jonas Hentati-Sundberg Long-eared Owl Asio otus breeding in a Caspian Gull Larus cachinnans colony: Reversed roles in protective nesting association? Hornugglor Asio otus häckande i en koloni med kaspiska trutar Larus cachinnans: Omvända skyddsroller för samhäckare? Klaudia Litwiniak & Marcin Przymencki . Poleska 37/17, 51-354 Wrocław, Poland | [email protected] & [email protected] WE DESCRIBE the event of Long-eared Owls Asio otus nesting on an island within a colony of Caspian Gulls Larus cachinnans at the Mietków Reservoir (SW Poland). The owls nested in an old (possible corvid) nest in a willow and raised two owlets. They probably did not hunt gulls, neither adults nor chicks. We suggest that, in this case, the Long-eared Owls benefitted from breeding within a gull colony because of the added security against predators that the gulls provided. Keywords: breeding association | breeding ecology | gull defense | nesting habitat | predator-free area Introduction The choice of a suitable habitat is presumably the damental needs of breeding adults and young, including result of integration of different habitat patches satisfy- the protection from predators and weather, and also ing the different requirements of individuals (Orians & the proximity to food sources. Because a choice may Wittenberger 1991). Bird nest-sites must meet the fun- enhance reproductive success, the behaviour involved Citation: Litwiniak K & Przymencki M. 2020. Long-eared Owl Asio otus breeding in a Caspian Gull Larus cachinnans colony: Reversed roles in protective nesting association? Ornis Svecica 30: 73–78.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List
    Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List April 2021 update Yorkhill Green Spaces Species list Draft list of animals, plants, fungi, mosses and lichens recorded from Yorkhill, Glasgow. Main sites: Yorkhill Park, Overnewton Park and Kelvinhaugh Park (AKA Cherry Park). Other recorded sites: bank of River Kelvin at Bunhouse Rd/ Old Dumbarton Rd, Clyde Expressway path, casual records from streets and gardens in Yorkhill. Species total: 711 Vertebrates: Amhibians:1, Birds: 57, Fish: 7, Mammals (wild): 15 Invertebrates: Amphipods: 1, Ants: 3, Bees: 26, Beetles: 21, Butterflies: 11, Caddisflies: 2, Centipedes: 3, Earthworms: 2, Earwig: 1, Flatworms: 1, Flies: 61, Grasshoppers: 1, Harvestmen: 2, Lacewings: 2, Mayflies: 2, Mites: 4, Millipedes: 3, Moths: 149, True bugs: 13, Slugs & snails: 21, Spiders: 14, Springtails: 2, Wasps: 13, Woodlice: 5 Plants: Flowering plants: 174, Ferns: 5, Grasses: 13, Horsetail: 1, Liverworts: 7, Mosses:17, Trees: 19 Fungi and lichens: Fungi: 24, Lichens: 10 Conservation Status: NameSBL - Scottish Biodiversity List Priority Species Birds of Conservation Concern - Red List, Amber List Last Common name Species Taxon Record Common toad Bufo bufo amphiban 2012 Australian landhopper Arcitalitrus dorrieni amphipod 2021 Black garden ant Lasius niger ant 2020 Red ant Myrmica rubra ant 2021 Red ant Myrmica ruginodis ant 2014 Buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris bee 2021 Garden bumblebee Bombus hortorum bee 2020 Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum bee 2021 Heath bumblebee Bombus jonellus bee 2020 Red-tailed bumblebee Bombus
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro
    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
    [Show full text]