DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity Inventory and Analysis of the Hanford Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biodiversity Inventory and Analysis of the Hanford Site 7 -12379 12 BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS OF THE HANFORD SITE 1994 Annual Report .. ~ ·.•.rl •• ~ '4:-;"' PREPARED BY THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF WASHINGTON FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MAY1995 olOb- lS- 1 Table 3. Bird species of special concern and the habitat in which they were observed on the North Slope and the ALE Reserve, 199 5 North S/01'8 Arid Lands Eco/oav Reserve Federal State Hanford 1995 Habitat n,pes . 1995 Habitat Types Common Name Status Status Status' Status Shb Grs Rd Rec Mfn Rip Riv Status Shb Grs Fld Rec Mfn Rip Can Common Loon Candidate R-w U-wrn X Homed Grebe · Monitor U-w U-m X X Red-necked Grebe Monitor - R-m .. X Western Grebe* Monitor U-r U-s X X Clark's Grebe* Monitor R-m U-s X American White Endangered U-r C-s X Pelican Great Blue Heron• Monitor C-r C-r X X U-r X Great Esrret Monitor R-m U-s X X Black-crowned Night Monitor U-r U-s X R-s Heron• Trumoeter Swan Candidate A-m R-m X Turkev Vulture Monitor A-m R-m X fly-over Osnrev Monitor U-m U-m X X Bald Eagle Threatened Threatened U-w C-w X X Golden Eagle Candidate U-m U-w X X X X X R-s X Swainson's Hawk• Candidate U-s U-s X X X X C-s X Ferruginous Hawk Candidate Threatened R-s R-s X U-s X Peregrine Falcon Endangered Endangered A-m R-ms X X Prairie Falcon• Monitor U-r R-w X X X X X X U-r X l Hanford Status (Landeen et al. 1992) • Breeding confumed on Hanford Site in l 99S Abundance Seasonal Occurrence Habitat Types C: Common ( often seen or heard in appropriate habitat) r: RSident Shb: native shrub Rip: riparian areas U: Uncommon (usually present but not always seen or heard) s: summer visitor (includes spring and fall) Ors: native bunchgrass Riv: riverine (Columbia River• North R: Rare (present in appropriate habitats only in small numbers; w: winter visitor (includes spring and fall) Fld: weedy field dominated by non• Slope only) native annuals seldom seen or heard ) m: migrant Can: dry upper slopes of canyons (ALE Reserve only) A: Accidental (appeared once or twice; well outside its normal range) Rec: recovery following fire or past cultivation Mtn: mountain top (Saddle Mtn., Rattlesnake Mtn.) (Continued on reverse side) ( Continue d on reverse side) Ir (Continued) North Slope Arid Lands Ecoloc,v Reserve Federal State Hanford 1995 Habitat r,,pes 1995 Habitat Types 1 Common Name Status Status Status Status Shb Grs Fld Rec Mtn Rip Riv Status Shb Grs Fld Rec Mtn Rip Can Says Phoebe• Monitor R-s X X X . X C-s X Gray Flycatcher Monitor R-s X Willow Flycatcher Monitor R-m X R-s X Sage Grouse Candidate Candidate R-r R-r? X Sandhill Crane Endangered U-m C-m X X fly-over Black-necked Stilt Monitor A R-sm X Long-billed Candidate Monitor C-s U-s X X X U-s X X Curlew• Casoian Tern Monitor R-s U-s X X fly-over Forster's Tern• Monitor U-s U-s X fly-over Burrowing Owl• Candidate U-s U-s X X U-s X Lewis' Woodpecker Candidate R-m R-s X R-m X Western Bluebird Candidate R-m R X Sage Thrasher• Candidate R-s U-s X U-s X X Lo22erhead Shrike• Candidate Candidate U-s U-s X X X X C-s X X Grasshopper Monitor U-s U-s X X X C-s X X X Sparrow• Sage Sparrow• Candidate U-s C-s X U-s X X I Hanford Status (Landeen et al. 1992) • Breeding confirmed on Hanford Site in I 995 Abundance Seasonal OcCllrftnce Habitat Types C: Common (often seen or heard in appropriate habitat) r. resident Shb: native shrub Rip: riparian areas U: Uncommon (usually present but not always seen or heard) s: summer visitor (includes spring and fall) Ors: native bunchgrass Riv: riverine (Columbia River• North R: Rare (present in appropriate habitats only in small numbers; ~: winter visitor (includes spring and fall) Fld: weedy field dominated by non­ Slope only) seldom seen or heard ) m: migrant native annuals · Can: dry upper slopes of canyons (ALE A: Accidental (appeared once or twice; well outside its normal range) Rec: recovery following fin or past Reserve only) cultivation Min: mountain top (Saddle Min., Rattlesnake Min.) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . ' TableL Hanford Biodiversity Inventory:_ Summary offindings, 1994 and 1995 Elements of Elements of 1994 and 1995 Research Area Areas Surveyed Interest *-1994 Interest *-1995 Combined Totals Plant communities ALE, North Slope, 4 7 occurrences 6 occurrences 53 occurrences part of Central of 8 priority of 1 priority of 9 priority Hanford communities community communities . I Overall, 36 distinct community types identified Rare plants 38,000 acres through- 49 populations of 33 populations of 82 populations of out Hanford Site 14 rare taxa 8 rare taxa 17 rare taxa / 1 taxon new to 2 taxa new to 3 taxa new to science science science 481 total plant taxa identified Birds ALE, North Slope, 31 Species of 3 Species of 33 Species of part of Central Concern Concern Concern Hanford 214 total bird species observed Insects ALE, part of Central Hundreds of rare Hundreds of rare 1000+ species Hanford taxa ••, 8 new to taxa ••, 11 new to documented-many science science rare and 19 new to science Butterflies and Limited - all areas 5 Species of 2 Species of 7 Species of moths Concern Concern Concern 164 total . lepidoptera species documented Reptiles and Limited - all areas None 4 Species of 4 Species of amphibians Concern Concern 12 total herptile species observed • Elements of interest in this table refers to plants, animals or plant communities with formal federal or state status (Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Sensitive, Species of Concern , Monitor, or Priority Habitat: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1996; Washington Department offish and Wildlife 1996; or Washington Natural Heritage Program 1993 and 1995); or species new to science. • • The "rare" designation for insects is less formal since few such designations exist. I xi BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS OF THE HANFORD SITE 1994 Annual Report Editor Robert J. Pabst Associate Editor/Designer Jan K. Lorey Contributors Kathryn Beck Florence Caplow James R. Dillman Patti A. Ensor Tony Greager David N. Rolph Curt Soper Andrew M. Stepniewski Dennis L. Strenge Gordon Todd David L. Wilderman Richard S. Zack Prepared by The Nature Conservancy of Washington in partial fulfillment of U.S. Department of Energy Grant Award Number DE-FG06-94RL 12858. Additional funding provided by The Nature Conservancy of Washington and The Bullitt Foundation. Na1JJFelJconservancy .. OF WASHINGTON 217 Pine Street, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Printed on recycled paper CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................... vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1 1.1 Background 1 1.1.1 History of the Hanford Site 1 1.1.2 The Shrnb-Steppe Ecosystem 1 1.1.3 Climate 2 1.1.4 Physiography 2 1.1.5 Management Areas 2 1.2 The Need for a Biodiversity Inventory 5 1.3 Ownership and Use of Data 5 1.4 Biodiversity Inventory Personnel 6 2.0 PLANT COMMUNITY ECOLOGY ............................................ 7 2.1 Purpose and Scope 7 2.2 Methods 7 2.2.1 Plant Community Classification and Taxonomy 7 2.2.2 Field Inventory 8 2.2.3 Conservation Ranking 9 2.2.4 Mapping 9 2.3 Findings 9 2.4 Further Inventory Needs 12 3.0 RARE PLANT BOTANY ......................................................... 13 3 .1 Purpose and Scope 13 3.2 Methods 13 3.2.1 Pre-field 13 3.2.2 Terminology 13 3.2.3 Field Inventory 14 3.2.4 Post-field 15 3 .3 Findings 15 3.3.1 Overview 15 3.3.2 A New Species 15 3.3.3 Findings by Management Area 16 3.4 Further Inventory Needs 19 111 CONTENTS 4.0 ORNITHOLOGY .................................................................... 21 4 .1 Purpose and Scope 21 4.2 Methods 21 4.2.1 General Transect Swveys 21 4.2.2 Point Counts 22 4.2.3 Habitat Type Designations 22 4.3 Findings 23 4.3.1 Overview 23 4.3.2 Findings by Habitat Type 23 4.3.3 Newly Documented Species at Hanford 28 4.4 Further Inventory Needs 28 5.0 ENTOMOLOGY ..................................................................... 29 5.1 Purpose and Scope 29 5.2 Methods 29 5.3 Findin~ 30 5.3.1 Overview 30 5.3.2 Findings by Insect Order 30 5.3.3 Summary ofFindings 34 5.4 Further Inventory Needs 34 6.0 THE FUTURE OF THE HANFORD SITE BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY ................................................ 37 7 .0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................... ~ ..................... 39 8.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................... 41 9.0 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................ 45 iv CONTENTS TABLES Table 1. Plant community types of the ALE Reserve and North Slope. 11 Table 2. Status, distribution and number of newly found and previously known rare plant populations. 17 Table 3. Bird species of special concern and their habitat. 26 FIGURES Follows page Figure 1. Prominent features and administrative boundaries of the Hanford Site. 2 Figure 2. Plant community types of the ALE Reserve. 10 Figure 3. Plant community types of the North Slope. 10 Figure 4. Rare plant population search areas on the Hanford Site. 14 Figure 5. Number of bird species that were observed in each habitat type On page on the Hanford Site in 1994. 24 PHOTOS Follows page Cover Rattlesnake Mountain and the Arid Lands Ecology Reserve.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Hemileuca Nuttalli) and GROUND MANTID (Litaneutria Minor) SEARCHES in the SOUTH OKANAGAN VALLEY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, 2009
    NUTTALL’S BUCKMOTH (Hemileuca nuttalli) AND GROUND MANTID (Litaneutria minor) SEARCHES IN THE SOUTH OKANAGAN VALLEY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, 2009 By Vicky Young and Dawn Marks, BC Conservation Corps BC Ministry of Environment Internal Working Report September 23, 2009 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Nuttall’s Buckmoth (Hemileuca nuttalli) and Ground Mantid (Litaneutria minor) are two invertebrate species listed for inventory under the BC Conservation Framework (2009). The Nuttall’s Buckmoth is listed as a mid priority species on The COSEWIC Candidate List (COSEWIC 2009). The Ground Mantid may be recommended as a COSEWIC candidate (Rob Cannings, COSEWIC Arthropod subcommittee, pers. comm.). These species were included in a list of target species for the BC Conservation Corps grassland species inventory crew. The crew spent 4 days surveying antelope-brush habitats within the Southern Okanagan between August 24th and September 1st 2009. These searches did not result in any detection of either target species. This preliminary attempt to address the lack of data for these invertebrate species will help inform future inventory efforts. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this project was provided by the BC Ministry of Environment through the BC Conservation Corps and through the BC Conservation Framework. We appreciate administrative support from the BC Conservation Foundation (Barb Waters). Guidance and mentorship was provided by Orville Dyer, Wildlife Biologist with the BC Ministry of Environment. Training regarding moth behaviour and identification was provided by Dennis St. John. Rob Cannings, Curator of Entomology, Royal BC Museum, provided insect biodiversity, insect inventory, collection of voucher specimens and identification training. Jerry Mitchell and Aaron Reid, biologists with the BC Ministry of Environment, provided assistance with Wildlife Species Inventory database submissions.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Systematics Studies Concerning the Insect Fauna of British Columbia
    J ENTOMOL. Soc. B RIT. COLU MBIA 9 8. DECDmER 200 1 33 An overview of systematics studies concerning the insect fauna of British Columbia ROBERT A. CANNINGS ROYAL BRITISI-I COLUMBIA MUSEUM, 675 BELLEVILLE STREET, VICTORIA, BC, CANADA V8W 9W2 GEOFFREY G.E. SCUDDER DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISI-I COLUMBIA, VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA V6T IZ4 INTRODUCTION This summary of insect systematics pertaining to British Co lumbia is not intended as an hi storical account of entomologists and their work, but rath er is an overview of th e more important studies and publications dealing with the taxonomy, identifi cati on, distribution and faunistics of BC species. Some statistics on th e known size of various taxa are also give n. Many of the systematic references to th e province's insects ca nnot be presented in such a short summary as thi s and , as a res ult, the treatment is hi ghl y se lec tive. It deals large ly with publications appearing after 1950. We examine mainly terrestrial groups. Alth ough Geoff Scudder, Professor of Zoo logy at the University of Briti sh Co lumbi a, at Westwick Lake in the Cariboo, May 1970. Sc udder is a driving force in man y facets of in sect systemat ics in Briti sh Co lum bia and Canada. He is a world authority on th e Hemiptera. Photo: Rob Ca nnin gs. 34 J ENTOMOL. Soc BR IT. COLUMBIA 98, DECEMBER200 1 we mention the aquatic orders (those in which the larv ae live in water but the adults are aerial), they are more fully treated in the companion paper on aquatic in sects in thi s issue (Needham et al.) as are the major aquatic families of otherwise terrestrial orders (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Amargosa River Expert Bioblitz April 7-9 , 2017 Final Report
    Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz April 7-9th, 2017 Final Report Photo credit: Janine Knapp Please cite this document as: Parker, S.S., B.S. Cohen, N. Fraga, B. Brown, J. Cole, W. Chatfield-Taylor, K. Guadalupe, G.B. Pauly, D. Cooper, and M. Ordeñana. 2017. Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz. Unpublished Report. The Nature Conservancy. Los Angeles, California. 50 pp. ii Report Contributors: Sophie S. Parker The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Brian S. Cohen The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Naomi Fraga Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden [email protected] Brian Brown Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Jeffrey Cole Pasadena City College [email protected] Will Chatfield-Taylor [email protected] Kevin Guadalupe Nevada Department of Wildlife [email protected] Gregory B. Pauly Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Daniel Cooper Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. [email protected] Miguel Ordeñana Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] iii Acknowledgements We thank our agency partners at the Bureau of Land Management, particularly C. Otahal, who co-organized the Amargosa River BioBlitz. We also thank the Amargosa Conservancy for supporting the collection efforts, and private land owners B. Brown of China Ranch and S. Sorrells of Shoshone Village for hosting volunteers on their property. iv Table of Contents I. Introduction and Context: Amargosa Watershed Conservation .............................................. 1 II. What is an Expert BioBlitz? ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VKM Rapportmal
    VKM Report 2016: 36 Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of terrestrial arachnids and insects Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) 2016: Assessment of risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of terrestrial arachnids and insects Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety 29.06.2016 ISBN: 978-82-8259-226-0 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) Po 4404 Nydalen N – 0403 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] www.vkm.no www.english.vkm.no Suggested citation: VKM (2016). Assessment of risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of terrestrial arachnids and insects. Scientific Opinion on the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety, ISBN: 978-82-8259-226-0, Oslo, Norway VKM Report 2016: 36 Assessment of risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of terrestrial arachnids and insects Authors preparing the draft opinion Anders Nielsen (chair), Merethe Aasmo Finne (VKM staff), Maria Asmyhr (VKM staff), Jan Ove Gjershaug, Lawrence R. Kirkendall, Vigdis Vandvik, Gaute Velle (Authors in alphabetical order after chair of the working group) Assessed and approved The opinion has been assessed and approved by Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Members of the panel are: Vigdis Vandvik (chair), Hugo de Boer, Jan Ove Gjershaug, Kjetil Hindar, Lawrence R.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List for Garey Park-Inverts
    Species List for Garey Park-Inverts Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Arachnid Araneae Agelenidae Funnel Weaver Common Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumena vatia Goldenrod Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Araneus miniatus Black-Spotted Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumessus oblongus American Green Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope aurantia Yellow Garden Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Uloboridae Uloborus glomosus Featherlegged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope trifasciata Banded Garden Spider Uncommon Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aceria theospyri Persimmon Leaf Blister Gall Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gasteracantha cancriformis Spinybacked Orbweaver Common Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aculops rhois Poison Ivy Leaf Mite Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gea heptagon Heptagonal Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Amblyomma americanum Lone Star Tick Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Larinioides cornutus Furrow Orbweaver Common Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Dermacentor variabilis American Dog Tick Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora gibberosa Lined Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Opiliones Sclerosomatidae Leiobunum vittatum Eastern Harvestman Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora placida Tuft-legged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Trombidiformes Anystidae Whirligig Mite Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mecynogea lemniscata Basilica Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Eumesosoma roeweri
    [Show full text]
  • The Grasshoppers and Other Orthoptera of Arizona
    The Grasshoppers and Other Orthoptera of Arizona Item Type text; Book Authors Ball, E. D.; Tinkham, E. R.; Flock, Robert; Vorhies, C. T. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 04/10/2021 13:31:26 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/190516 Technical Bulletin No. §3 June 15, 1942 Utttomttg fff Arfemta COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION THE AND OF ARIZONA BY E. D. BALL, K R. XIHKHAM, ROBERT FtocK, AND C. T. VQKBIES BY Itttaerattg ORGANIZATION BOABD OF BEGENTS Sidney P. Osborn (ex-of&cio).. Governor of Arizona E. D. Ring, B.A, (ex-officio). State Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Albert M. Crawford, B.S., President Prescott William H. Westover, LL.B Yuma Martin Gentry, LL,B Willcox Cleon T. Kmapp, LL.B.» Treasurer Tucson Jack B. Martin, Secretary,.,. Tucson M. O. Best Phoenix Clarence E. Houston, LL.B., B.A..... , ..Tucson Mrs. Joseph Madison Greet, B.A. Phoenix Alfred Atkinson, D.Sc .President of the University EXPJSBIMEHT STATION STAFF Paul S. Burgess, PhJX Dean and Director Ralph S. Hawkins, Ph,D ..Vice-Dean and Vice-Director ENTOMOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ZOOLOGY Charles T. Vorhies, Ph,D .Economic Zoologist •Elmer D. Ball, PhD ...™._ Entomologist Lawrence P, Wehrle, Ph.D...., , .„„. Associate Entomologist H, G* Johnston, Ph.D Associate Entomologist (Phoenix) *On leave. EBRWR Make following changes in numbers caa right hand margins only; Page 299, change "2^" to "26" Page 300, change "26" to "2k" Page 533, change "2V to "25" Pass 333, change "22" to "23" Page 33U, change "23" to "22" Page 33^, change "25" to "24" TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION.,.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Field Identification Cards (1 of 28)
    Forest Field Identification Cards (1 of 28) For more information and resources, visit hctfeducation.ca or contact [email protected] © HCTF Education Forest Field Identification Cards (2 of 28) Range in B.C. Widespread and common throughout most of B.C., except rarely in alpine, grasslands, and densely populated areas. Conservation Status B.C.: Secure (YELLOW LIST) I love my space and live a solitary life, except if I’m a hole on a hillside for the winter. During a warm spell mama bear with cubs. We can be brown, cinnamon in winter, or if disturbed, I can be awakened from or blonde. The Kermode bear or spirit bear, which is a my torpor state. Don’t let my slow lumbering gait black bear, is white. Not a fussy eater, I am omnivorous fool you, I can run up to 55 km per hour, and I am an eating insects, plants, meat and carrion. I feast on excellent tree-climber. berries in late summer and early fall before I den in caves, tree cavities, under fallen wildlife trees or in a GroundBlack Bear mantis ((Ursus ((Litaneutria americanus) minor) Range in B.C. Widely distributed across the province except absent from coastal areas and islands, including Vancouver Island and Haida Gwaii. Conservation Status B.C.: Secure (YELLOW LIST) I am the largest member of the deer family. I am a I can swim 19 kilometres and can dive 5 metres browser and need as much as 19 kg of food each day. underwater to forage on aquatic plants. Although I During the winter months, I depend solely on twigs have poor eyesight, I make up for it with my excellent and shrubs to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • JESBC 2007 73-80 Cannings.Pub
    J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 104, DECEMBER 2007 73 Recent range expansion of the Praying Mantis, Mantis religiosa Linnaeus (Mantodea: Mantidae), in British Columbia ROBERT A. CANNINGS1 ABSTRACT The Praying Mantis, Mantis religiosa, was introduced into eastern North America in the 1890s and is now a common species throughout much of the eastern United States and southern Ontario and Quebec. It was introduced from Ontario into the southern interior of British Columbia to control grasshoppers in 1937 and 1938. These introductions be- came established only in the southern Okanagan Valley where populations have per- sisted from Okanagan Falls south to Osoyoos. Since the late 1990s, the species’ range has expanded from the South Okanagan north at least to Kamloops and east to Nelson. In addition, in the core of its traditional British Columbia range, the South Okanagan, this mantid has become more commonly encountered during the past decade. M. re- ligiosa has also been collected on Vancouver Island. Specimen, photograph and sight records that document this change in status are listed and discussed and a distribution map is included. Characters used to distinguish M. religiosa from the native Ground Mantis, Litaneutria minor, and the exotic Chinese Mantis, Tenodera aridifolia sinensis, which is available commercially as a biocontrol agent, are summarized. INTRODUCTION The Praying Mantis, Mantis religiosa ligiosa became established only in the Linnaeus, was introduced into the eastern southern Okanagan Valley. Since the early United States and Canada from Europe, 1970s, M. religiosa specimens regularly being first reported in New York State in have been found between Okanagan Falls 1899 and in Prince Edward County, Ontario and Osoyoos (Cannings and Scudder 2001); in 1914 (McLeod 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Mantids of Colorado Fact Sheet No
    Mantids of Colorado Fact Sheet No. 5.510 Insect Series|Home and Garden by W. Cranshaw* Mantids are some of the most distinctive Quick Facts and well-recognized of all the insect groups. All mantids are predators that feed on various • Mantids are large, distinctive insects, including some pest species. Seven insects that feed on other species of mantids are found in Colorado insects, including some pests. (Table 1), five of which are native to the state. Mantids are very distinctive insects. All • All mantids survive winter in have front legs which are large and well- the egg stage, within a large designed for grasping prey. The segment of egg case (ootheca). the body containing these legs (prothorax) • There are seven kinds is very elongated as is the overall body form. of mantids that occur in Mantids also have the ability to easily turn Colorado, five that are native their heads in order to see in all directions and have widely spaced eyes that give them to the state and two that are excellent binocular vision. introduced species. • The most commonly General Life History encountered mantid in much of the state is the European Mantids survive winter as eggs. The eggs are laid in a case, known as an ootheca, and mantid, which may be brown each contains several dozen to over a 100 or green. eggs. A foamy material covers the oothecal as • Egg cases of the Chinese it is being produced and this then hardens to mantid are commonly sold protect and insulate the eggs. These egg cases through nurseries and garden are attached to solid surfaces such as rocks, catalogs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Investigation of the Arthropod Fauna of Quitobaquito Springs Area, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona
    COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 125 Biological Sciences (East) Bldg. 43 Tucson, Arizona 85721 R. Roy Johnson, Unit Leader National Park Senior Research Scientist TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 23 A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THE ARTHROPOD FAUNA OF QUITOBAQUITO SPRINGS AREA, ORGAN PIPE CACTUS NATIONAL MONUMENT, ARIZONA KENNETH J. KINGSLEY, RICHARD A. BAILOWITZ, and ROBERT L. SMITH July 1987 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE/UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA National Park Service Project Funds CONTRIBUTION NUMBER CPSU/UA 057/01 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 Methods............................................................................................................................................1 Results ............................................................................................................................................2 Discussion......................................................................................................................................20 Literature Cited ..............................................................................................................................22 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................23 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Insects Collected at Quitobaquito Springs ...................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Survey of the Orthoptera of Oklahoma
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SHAREOK repository Technical Bulletin No. 5 December, 1938 OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Lippert S. Ellis, Acting Director An Ecological Survey of the Orthoptera of Oklahoma By MORGAN HEBARD Philadelphia Museum of Natural History Curator of Orthoptera Stillwater, Oklahoma FOREWORD By F. A. Fenton Head, Department of Entomology Oklahoma A. and M. College The grasshopper problem in Oklahoma has become of increasing importance in recent years, and because these insects are among the state's most destructive agricultural pests the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station has taken up their study as one of its important research proj­ ects. An important step in this work is a survey to determine what species occur in the State, their geographic distribution, and the relative import­ ance of different species as crop and range pests. The present bulletin represents such a survey which was made during a particularly favorable year when grasshoppers were unusually abundant and destructive. The major portion of the State was covered and collections were made in all of the more important types of habitats. To make the stup.y more complete, all of the Orthoptera have been included in this bulletin. One hundred and four species and 12 subspecies or races are listed for the State, including 17 which are classed as in­ jurious. The data are based upon over seven thousand specimens which were collected during the period of the investigation. This collection was classified by Doctor Morgan Hebard, Curator of Orthoptera, Philadelphia Museum of Natural History, who is the author of this bulletin.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro (AEOUAAAN
    UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA AGRARIA “ANTONIO NARRO” DIVISION DE AGRONOMIA DEPARTAMENTO DE PARASITOLOGIA AGRICOLA BIOLOGIA DE CAMPO Y LABORATORIO DE LA CAMPAMOCHA, Mantis religiosa Linneaus (MANTODEA: MANTIDAE). M O N O G R A F I A PRESENTADA POR: RICARDO REYNOLDS MORALES CHAVEZ COMO REQUISITO PARCIAL PARA OBTENER EL TITULO DE: INGENIERO AGRONOMO PARASITOLOGO BUENAVISTA, SALTILLO, COAHUILA, MEXICO. MARZO DEL 2000. UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA AGRARIA “ANTONIO NARRO” DIVISION DE AGRONOMIA DEPARTAMENTO DE PARASITOLOGIA AGRICOLA BIOLOGIA DE CAMPO Y LABORATORIO DE LA CAMPAMOCHA Mantis religiosa Linneaus (MANTODEA: MANTIDAE). POR: RICARDO REYNOLDS MORALES CHAVEZ M O N O G R A F I A QUE SOMETE A LA CONSIDERACION DEL H. JURADO EXAMINADOR COMO REQUISITO PARCIAL PARA OBTENER EL TITULO DE: INGENIERO AGRONOMO PARASITOLOGO APROBADA POR: __________________________ __________________________ DR. OSWALDO GARCIA MARTINEZ DR. MELCHOR CEPEDA SILLER PRESIDENTE DEL JURADO PRIMER SINODAL ____________________________ ____________________________ M.C. MARIANO FLORES DAVILA DR. ABIEL SÁNCHEZ ARIZPE SEGUNDO SINODAL SINODAL SUPLENTE ________________________________ M.C. REYNALDO ALONSO VELASCO COORD. DE LA DIV. DE AGRONOMIA BUENAVISTA, SALTILLO, COAHUILA, MEXICO. MARZO 9 DEL 2000. DEDICATORIA Al Gran Espíritu Todopoderoso y a Jesús: por su selección para darme la vida, protegerme y ser lo que soy en esta sublime aventura de vivir, permitiéndome alcanzar uno de sus objetivos. A mis Padres Zenón Morales Rosario y Carmen Chávez López: por su disciplina, todo su amor, sacrificios, enseñanzas y estímulos, para obtener juntos éste logro de mi vida: Mi Profesión. A la Memoria de mi Hermano Mario Nicolás Morales Chávez: Protector de mi niñez. A mis Hermanos: Geralda: Por enseñarme su carácter y perseverancia. Roselia: Por compartir conmigo su dulzura y sensibilidad.
    [Show full text]