DOCSLIB.ORG

Skyteam: Caring More About You a Conversation with É Leo Van Wijk, Chairman, Skyteam Pg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Skyteam: Caring More About You a Conversation with É Leo Van Wijk, Chairman, Skyteam Pg A MAGAZINE FOR AIRLINE EXECUTIVES 2011 Issue No. 1 Taking your airline to new heights SkyTeam: Caring More About You A Conversation With É Leo van Wijk, Chairman, SkyTeam Pg. 10 18 Strategic commercial planning 46 Avianca-TACA merger changed Latin 63 Merchandising through GDS gives airlines increases airline revenues America aviation additional storefront © 2011 Sabre Inc. All rights reserved. [email protected] ASCEND I SPECIAL SECTION The Sports Car Southwest Airlines’ acquisition of AirTran Airways opens new opportunities Southwest Airlines’ purchase of AirTran Holdings gives the airline access to new markets that appeal to leisure and business travelers alike. By Mark Hess | Ascend Contributor and Lynne Bowers-Dodson | Ascend Staff Shutterstock Photos: 50 ascend ASCEND I SPECIAL SECTION ascend 51 ASCEND I SPECIAL SECTION uying a flashy sports car has long share at Boston Logan and New Y ork LaGuardia. fundamental changes that have occurred and will been held as a tell-tale sign that a Southwest expects the acquisition will generate occur in the U.S. airline industry over the next man is speeding toward a mid-life roughly US$400 million in annual savings by 2013. few years is the dramatic growth of low-cost crisis. The stereotypical event is “Combining with AirTran makes good business Southwest Airlines.” triggered usually when the man sense for Southwest; it can add 38 cities relatively Southwest grew organically and through acqui - realizes he wants to take a new quickly, and many of these new markets are on the sitions during the 1980s and 1990s. In the mid Bdirection in life rather than traveling down the East Coast, where Southwest has had weak cover- 1980s, it bought Dallas, T exas-based Muse Air . same path. Similarly , does AirT ran Airways age,” said T om Parsons, CEO of BestFares.com. Nearly 10 years later , it acquired Salt Lake City , represent the “sports car” that signals a new “Without this acquisition, it would take Southwest Utah-based Morris Air. phase in the life of Southwest Airlines? eight to 10 years to add that many new cities.” In 2005, it purchased assets from bankrupt ATA, Business experts acknowledge that at some but in 2009 it suffered a setback when it lost a point in the lifecycle of every business, stake - The Maturing Maverick bankruptcy court-sponsored auction to buy Frontier holders come to the realization that fundamental From its modest beginnings, linking Houston, Airlines Holdings, Inc. Undeterred, CEO Gary Kelly change is needed. The first course of action is Dallas and San Antonio, Southwest Airlines was said the carrier was still in the market for another coming up with a vision of where the business is a maverick set on revolutionizing air travel. It was deal. So it’ s puzzling that the AirT ran Airways headed. affordable and it was fun. Its freewheeling culture, acquisition last fall took much of the industry by For Southwest Airlines, the US$1.4 billion which famously showcased “hostesses” wearing surprise. Their route structures are complementary. AirTran Holding purchase last year signals that it skimpy hot pants who kept up an exuberant banter And of their combined 604 unique markets, only 26 envisions a future where extended service to new with passengers, was in stark contrast to the but - are served by both, less than a 5 percent overlap. domestic and international markets will accelerate toned up network carriers. In a PBS interview , USA Today columnist and its goal to boost profits and achieve financial Throughout the 1980s, Southwest remained industry analyst Ben Mutzabaugh said the merger targets. the scrappy upstart, pioneering a new type of makes it apparent that Southwest plans to trans - The blockbuster deal will create the most expan- low-cost, low-fare, low-frills flying experience. It form itself from a no-frills carrier into one that is sive network of any low-cost carrier in the United disproved the prevailing notion that passengers more focused on business travelers. States. It will also give the airline a chance to grab preferred service over price and stole market share “If you are going to be a serious business business travelers in the nation’s busiest markets. from major carriers. travel [carrier], you have got to be in the markets Through the merger, Southwest, which already The carrier’ s “cookie-cutter” method of mov - like W ashington Reagan National, New Y ork La carries more domestic flyers than any other U.S. ing into a new city and sharply cutting fares and Guardia, Boston and Atlanta,” he said. “And this airline, will for the first time go head-to-head driving up traffic was a driving force for dropping merger really positions them for that.” with Delta Air Lines on its home turf at Atlanta’s overall fares in its new markets. The so-called Wall Street Journal analysts observed that Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, the busiest “Southwest Effect” was a phenomenon studied Southwest has hinted for some time that it wants passenger airport in the world. It will also gain in business schools and by the U.S. Department to shed its mantle as a traditional low-cost car - access to Reagan W ashington National Airport in of Transportation. In a 1993 report, DOT observed, rier. When the merger was announced, the news Washington, D.C., as well as capture increased “The princip al drivin g force behind dramat ic agency remarked that Southwest “is planning Photo: Southwest Airlines LCCs Consolidate Southwest Airlines’ purchase of AirTran Airways forms the most expansive network of any U.S. low-cost carrier . 52 ascend ASCEND I SPECIAL SECTION a raft of measures as it seeks to transition from a discount airline. The moves include a recently unveiled revamp of its frequent-flyer program to boost its appeal to high-value business travelers, a new reservations system, its planned US$1.4 billion takeover of discount carrier AirT ran and the purchase of bigger planes.” Still, Southwest executives say they have no plans to stray too far from the essential elements that have allowed the airline to post profits for the past 37 consecutive years. “We have open seating; we have no plans to change that,” said Gary Kelly in a press release announcing the merger . “W e don’ t charge for bags; we have no plans to change that. W e have single-class service; we have no plans to change that.” Driving Change Conventional management wisdom says that companies, like people, must pass through a life cycle. Blogger Donald Sull, faculty director of executive education at London Business School, describes the progression. “Start-ups begin their life in a period of rapid- fire experimentation, pass into the organizational Photo: Shutterstock equivalent of adolescence as the company scales US$1.4 billion purchase The purchase of AirTran Airways last year offers Southwest Airlines immedi - its business model, eventually mature into the ate access to 38 cities on the U.S. East Coast. dull reliability of middle age, and then lapse into unavoidable decline,” he said. Sull rejects the inevitability of the metaphor , A merger will also open up more choices Southwest no longer seems as low-priced as it had pointing out that companies do not pass through to budget-conscious leisure travelers since the been. Perhaps that change is already under way .” lifecycles. Opportunities do. Companies can avoid Southwest Effect most likely will compel other David Grossman, veteran business traveler and mid-life crisis and decline simply by seizing oppor - carriers to match its low fares to virtually every former airline executive, also voiced concern that tunities. And that’ s exactly what Southwest and corner of the country. the Southwest-AirT ran Airways deal may have AirTran Airways executives did last year as they Last September , Parsons told USA T oday implications beyond the merger of two airlines. read the handwriting on the recessionary wall. reporters, “America needs this now . With this By agre eing to me rge with Southwe st, Both carriers recognized that a flurry of leg- deal you can now go just about anywhere in the Grossman posits that AirT ran Airways executives acy consolidations, such as Delta-Northwest country, and to the Caribbean and Mexico, on have conceded that their business as a stand-alone and Continental-United, as well as the expan - Southwest. All the legacy airlines will have to set airline was at risk. If other low-cost carriers concur , sion of alliances, had created behemoth their prices based on whatever Southwest does.” he said in an article he wrote for USA Today, “this competitors for low-cost carriers. That com - will likely not be the last merger or major action bined with rising oil prices left stand-alone, The End Of An Era? taken by an LCC. It could spell the end of LCCs low-cost carriers particularly vulnerable. Not all industry insiders agree with Parsons’ as we know them if more consolidate, join alli - When the merger announcement came, assessment that fares will remain competitive ances or morph into something better resembling AirTran Airways CEO Bob Fornaro stressed in with a new super-sized Southwest. In fact, some traditional network airlines. That may not bode well a conference call with reporters that his airline think the opposite is just as likely. for those who have enjoyed an extended spell of had “done a lot with not much” in terms of Chief among the naysayers is blogger Carl low airfares.” financial resources, but that it was becoming Unger, who writes for Today in Travel. Only time will tell if Southwest Airlines’ midlife less clear that AirTran Airways had the ability “Southwest’s costs have risen dramatically opportunity becomes a midlife crisis for a struggling to grow and remain competitive in an industry over the past 18 months, and are currently the low-cost carrier business model.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Southwest Airlines 1996 Annual Report
    1996 Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Consolidated Highlights 2 Introduction 3 Letter to Shareholders 4 People and Planes 6 Southwest Spirit 8 THE Low Fare Airline 10 Productivity 12 Ontime Performance 14 Customer Satisfaction 16 Mintenance and Safety 18 What’s Next? 20 Financial Review 22 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 22 Consolidated Financial Statements 31 Report of Independent Auditors 49 Quarterly Financial Data 50 Common Stock Price Ranges and Dividends 50 Corporate Data 51 Directors and Officers 52 Ten Year Summary 55 CONSOLIDATED HIGHLIGHTS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS PERCENT EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) 1996 1995 CHANGE Operating revenues $3,406,170 $2,872,751 18.6 Operating expenses $3,055,335 $2,559,220 19.4 Operating income $350,835 $313,531 11.9 Operating margin 10.3% 10.9% (0.6)pts. Net income $207,337 $182,626 13.5 Net margin 6.1% 6.4% (0.3)pts. Net income per common and common equivalent share $1.37 $1.23 11.4 Stockholders’ equity $1,648,312 $1,427,318 15.5 Return on average stockholders’ equity 13.5% 13.7% (0.2)pts. Debt as a percentage of invested capital 28.3% 31.7% (3.4)pts. Stockholders’ equity per common share outstanding $11.36 $9.91 14.6 Revenue passengers carried 49,621,504 44,785,573 10.8 Revenue passenger miles (RPMs)(000s) 27,083,483 23,327,804 16.1 Available seat miles (ASMs)(000s) 40,727,495 36,180,001 12.6 Passenger load factor 66.5% 64.5% 2.0 pts. Passenger revenue yield per RPM 12.07¢ 11.83¢ 2.0 Operating revenue yield per ASM 8.36¢ 7.94¢ 5.3 Operating expenses per ASM 7.50¢ 7.07¢ 6.1 Number of Employees at yearend 22,944 19,933 15.1 NET INCOME (in millions) $207 $179 $183 250 $154 200 $97 150 100 50 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 2 NET INCOME PER SHARE $1.37 $1.22 $1.23 1.40 $1.05 1.20 1.00 $.68 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Trends
    9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 15 1 M Overview and Trends The Transportation Research Board (TRB) study committee that pro- duced Winds of Change held its final meeting in the spring of 1991. The committee had reviewed the general experience of the U.S. airline in- dustry during the more than a dozen years since legislation ended gov- ernment economic regulation of entry, pricing, and ticket distribution in the domestic market.1 The committee examined issues ranging from passenger fares and service in small communities to aviation safety and the federal government’s performance in accommodating the escalating demands on air traffic control. At the time, it was still being debated whether airline deregulation was favorable to consumers. Once viewed as contrary to the public interest,2 the vigorous airline competition 1 The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 was preceded by market-oriented administra- tive reforms adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) beginning in 1975. 2 Congress adopted the public utility form of regulation for the airline industry when it created CAB, partly out of concern that the small scale of the industry and number of willing entrants would lead to excessive competition and capacity, ultimately having neg- ative effects on service and perhaps leading to monopolies and having adverse effects on consumers in the end (Levine 1965; Meyer et al. 1959). 15 9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 16 16 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY spurred by deregulation now is commonly credited with generating large and lasting public benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Strategic Behavior in the U.S. Airline Industry
    Essays on Strategic Behavior in the U.S. Airline Industry Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kerria Measkhan Tan, B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Economics The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Matthew Lewis, Advisor James Peck Huanxing Yang c Copyright by Kerria Measkhan Tan 2012 Abstract In my first dissertation essay, \Incumbent Response to Entry by Low-Cost Carri- ers in the U.S. Airline Industry," I analyze the price response of incumbents to entry by low-cost carriers in the U.S. airline industry. Previous theoretical papers suggest that airlines might respond to entry by lowering prices to compete harder for existing customers or they might increase prices to exploit their brand-loyal customers. This paper tests which effect is more prominent in the airline industry. I find that when one of four low-cost carriers enters a particular route, legacy carrier incumbents respond differently than low-cost carrier incumbents to new low-cost carrier entry. Legacy carriers decrease their mean airfare, 10th percentile airfare, and 90th percentile air- fare before and after entry by a low-cost carrier. However, low-cost carriers do not significantly alter their pricing strategy. The differing incumbent responses can be attributed to the finding that low-cost carrier entrants tend to match the price set by rival low-cost carriers in the quarter of entry and tend to enter with a lower price than that of legacy carrier incumbents. The results also suggest that entry does not affect price dispersion by incumbent carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Free Bird Sings the Song of the Caged: Southwest Airlines' Fight to Repeal the Wright Amendment John Grantham
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 72 | Issue 2 Article 10 2007 A Free Bird Sings the Song of the Caged: Southwest Airlines' Fight to Repeal the Wright Amendment John Grantham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation John Grantham, A Free Bird Sings the Song of the Caged: Southwest Airlines' Fight to Repeal the Wright Amendment, 72 J. Air L. & Com. 429 (2007) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol72/iss2/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. A FREE BIRD SINGS THE SONG OF THE CAGED: SOUTHWEST AIRLINES' FIGHT TO REPEAL THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT JOHN GRANTHAM* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 430 II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .................... 432 A. THE BATTLE TO ESTABLISH AIRPORTS IN NORTH T EXAS .......................................... 433 B. PLANNING FOR THE SUCCESS OF THE NEW AIRPORT ........................................ 436 C. THE UNEXPECTED BATTLE FOR AIRPORT CONSOLIDATION ................................... 438 III. THE EXCEPTION TO DEREGULATION ......... 440 A. THE DEREGULATION OF AIRLINE TRAVEL ......... 440 B. DEFINING THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT RESTRICTIONS ................................... 444 C. EXPANDING THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT ........... 447 D. SOUTHWEST COMES OUT AGAINST THE LoVE FIELD RESTRICTIONS ............................... 452 E. THE END OF AN ERA OR THE START OF SOMETHING NEW .................................. 453 IV. THE WRIGHT POLICY ............................ 455 A. COMMERCE CLAUSE ................................. 456 B. THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT WILL REMAIN STRONG LAW IF ALLOWED .................................. 456 1. ConstitutionalIssues ......................... 456 2. Deference to Administrative Agency Interpretation...............................
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Airlines: a Comparative Case Study of High-Road Versus Low-Road Strategies in Customer Service and Reputation Management
    International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace Volume 6 Issue 2 Article 4 2019 A Tale of Two Airlines: A Comparative Case Study of High-Road versus Low-Road Strategies in Customer Service and Reputation Management Donna Roberts WW/Social Sciences & Economics, [email protected] John C. Griffith Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/ijaaa Part of the Business Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Roberts, D., & Griffith, J. C. (2019). Aale T of Two Airlines: A Comparative Case Study of High-Road versus Low-Road Strategies in Customer Service and Reputation Management. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1317 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Tale of Two Airlines: A Comparative Case Study of High-Road versus Low-Road Strategies in Customer Service and Reputation Management Cover Page Footnote We would like to acknowledge the support of Embry Riddle Aeronautical University for providing funding for travel and software in support of this research. This article is available in International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace: https://commons.erau.edu/ ijaaa/vol6/iss2/4 Roberts and Griffith: A Tale of Two Airlines: A Comparative Case Study of High-Road versus Low-Road Strategies in Customer Service and Reputation Management Introduction This research represents an in-depth comparative case study highlighting the differences in marketing strategies, and customer service models between American low-cost carrier Southwest Airlines and European low-cost carrier Ryanair.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Effect”
    The Evolution of the “Southwest Effect” The Honors Program Senior Capstone Project Student’s Name: Daniel Webb Faculty Sponsor: David Ketcham May 2012 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Literature Review ...................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 13 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 22 Future Research ....................................................................................................................... 22 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................ 24 The Evolution of the “Southwest Effect” Senior Capstone Project for Daniel Webb ABSTRACT The “Southwest effect” - a large decrease in fares paired with an increase in traffic - has been discussed around the airline industry since the term was first coined in a government study in the early 1990s. But the airline industry has drastically changed since then - Southwest has become the largest domestic airline,
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight of U.S. Airline Customer Service Hearing
    OVERSIGHT OF U.S. AIRLINE CUSTOMER SERVICE (115–13) HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MAY 2, 2017 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( Available online at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ committee.action?chamber=house&committee=transportation U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 25–311 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:29 Nov 13, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\HEARINGS\115\FULL\5-2-20~1\25311.TXT JEAN COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman DON YOUNG, Alaska PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee, ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of Vice Chair Columbia FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey JERROLD NADLER, New York SAM GRAVES, Missouri EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas DUNCAN HUNTER, California ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas RICK LARSEN, Washington LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California BOB GIBBS, Ohio DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida STEVE COHEN, Tennessee JEFF DENHAM, California ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky JOHN GARAMENDI, California MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania ANDRE´ CARSON, Indiana RODNEY DAVIS, Illinois RICHARD M. NOLAN, Minnesota MARK SANFORD, South Carolina DINA TITUS, Nevada ROB WOODALL, Georgia SEAN PATRICK MALONEY, New York TODD ROKITA, Indiana ELIZABETH H.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERT REPORT of MICHAEL E. LEVINE in Re
    EXPERT REPORT of MICHAEL E. LEVINE in re: Brady et. al. v. Air Line Pilots Association, et. al Civil Action No. 02-cv-02917-JEI (D.N.J.) 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 A. Qualifications ............................................................................................................... 3 B. Overview of Assignment ........................................................................................... 5 C. Summary of Opinions ................................................................................................ 5 D. Summary of Plaintiffs’ Expert Opinions ................................................................. 7 II. TWA Was Structurally Unsound and No Longer Viable as a Standalone Airline ................................................................................................................................. 9 A. Historical Overview of TWA’s Competitive Position ........................................ 10 B. TWA’s Inability To Survive with a Single Hub in St. Louis ............................... 12 C. The Impact of Southwest Airlines Competition at St. Louis ............................. 17 D. The American Acquisition Was TWA’s Only Alternative to Liquidation ....... 21 III. The Challenges to Seniority Integration at American Airlines .............................. 26 A. The Unique Importance of Labor Relations in the Airline Industry ................ 26 B. The Impact of
    [Show full text]
  • The Southwest Effect -- Successful Practices of a Market Leader Presented By: Jason Young
    The Southwest Effect -- Successful Practices of a Market Leader Presented by: Jason Young The Southwest Effect Successful Practices of a Market Leader CULTURETOPIA CULTURETOPIA 2018 Frame Building Expo Keynote Presentation - Wednesday, February 14, 2018 The Southwest Effect -- Successful Practices of a Market Leader Presented by: Jason Young The Emergence of Southwest • Founded by Herb Kelleher and Rollin King in the late 60 ’s • Designed to be a low cost high frequency carrier serving Dallas, San Antonio and Houston • After several years of legal battles with other airlines, Southwest won their certificate to fly in Texas in 1971 • From the very beginning the employees of Southwest wanted make flying fun and available to all of the traveling public not just business travelers, the wealthy and celebrities CULTURETOPIA The Emergence of Southwest • Consumers, particularly corporate travel departments, became more price-sensitive in the 80 ’s • Consumers began to redefine quality more in terms of reliability • After about 20 years of operation, Southwest gained national attention in early 90 ’s by winning California intrastate markets from other major carriers • During the Gulf War crisis, Southwest expanded while other airlines shrank CULTURETOPIA 2018 Frame Building Expo Keynote Presentation - Wednesday, February 14, 2018 The Southwest Effect -- Successful Practices of a Market Leader Presented by: Jason Young Continued Growth • While other airlines struggle to achieve 3 or 4 consecutive years of profitability, Southwest has been profitable every year since 1973 “The most successful airline in history… ” CULTURETOPIA “Southwest is having a profound effect on the airline industry. Southwest’s much lower operating costs are making it the dominant airline today in the sense that Southwest, more than any other airline, is causing the industry to change.
    [Show full text]
  • 288389186.Pdf
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository This item was submitted to Loughborough’s Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) by the author and is made available under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ The Southwest Effect: A time series analysis on passengers carried by selected routes and a market share comparison. D.E.Pitfield Transport Studies Group Department of Civil and Building Engineering Loughborough University Loughborough Leicestershire LE11 3TU UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Southwest effect has been known for some time in terms of the US airline’s impact on pricing, competition and traffic volumes. But recent estimates of the impact on traffic and market shares do not exist. This desideratum can be addressed by applying Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models with Intervention analysis to key domestic air routes in the USA where Southwest has started service. The paper first deals with the choice of routes to be examined and, after a preliminary statistical description of these, applies the ARIMA models. These results are examined for both their statistical qualities and their reasonableness and the impacts are compared to those previously determined in the same way for Ryanair’s routes from London. Keywords: Low-Cost Carriers, ARIMA Models, Intervention Analysis, Market Share. JEL Classification Time Series Models C22, Transportation R40 1.0 Introduction Previous published work (Pitfield, 2007a) has been able to demonstrate, using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) modelling with Intervention Analysis, what the impact of Ryanair’s start up of service from London Stansted (STN) has been on competing airlines flying from other airports in the London system to either the same airport as Ryanair but more usually to an airport that is not thought of as a secondary airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Airlines
    PRESS Southwest Airlines Web case study to accompany Managing Human ResourcesDUPLICATE Twelfth EditionUNIVERSITY OR OXFORDSusan E. Jackson Randall S. Schuler OFRutgers University and University of Lucerne DISTRIBUTE Steve Werner University of Houston NOT DO PROPERTY Managing Human Resources, Twelfth Edition, Susan E. Jackson, Randall S. Schuler, Steve Werner 1 Copyright © 2018 by Oxford University Press SOUTHWEST AIRLINES1 The tale of two men, one airline, and one cocktail napkin . “Let’s start our own airline,” Rollin W. King said to his friend, Herb Kelleher, in a bar, decades ago. “Convince me,” Herb replied. On a cocktail napkin, Rollin drew a triangle connecting Texas’s major cities. HePRESS said, “We could offer fares so low people would fly instead of drive.” Herb paused, placed his drink on the napkin, and then spoke: “Rollin, you’re crazy. Let’s do it.”1 INTRODUCTION DUPLICATE Southwest Airlines continues to face a multitude of changingUNIVERSITY challenges to its historically successful business strategy. These challenges are both externalOR and internal. External challenges include leaner competitors, increased safety concerns, and limited growth opportunities in current markets. Internally, the company faces challenges such as adapting to a new business strategy, keeping costs the lowest in the industry, keeping their unique culture, and maximizing the OXFORD effectiveness of its talent. Southwest’s talent is selected very carefully and compensated very competitively, resultingOF in high levels of customer service. Southwest’s strategy of having the highest customer service whileDISTRIBUTE being cheap and efficient depends on highly motivated employees 1Source: Ari Ginsberg and Richard Freedman prepared the original version of this case with the research assistance of Bill Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of the ATA/Southwest Airlines Code Share
    The Economic Impact of the ATA/Southwest Airlines Code Share Alliance B. Starr McMullen*, Professor of Economics and Agricultural and Resource Economics Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97330 [email protected] and Yan Du Ph.D. Student in Economics Oregon State University * Corresponding author 1 The Economic Impact of the ATA/Southwest Airlines Code Share Alliance I. Introduction In October 2004, ATA Holdings and its subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.1 Subsequently, Southwest Airlines injected capital into ATA Airlines that resulted in Southwest having a 27.5% ownership stake in ATA upon their exit from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. As part of the deal, Southwest entered into a code-sharing arrangement with ATA. This was Southwest’s first domestic code-sharing arrangement. ATA chose eleven cities that had not been previously served by Southwest as code-share cities and established Chicago Midway Airport as the connecting airport (See Table 1 for a listing of the code share cities). Southwest Airlines, based in Dallas, Texas, is the third largest airline in the world in terms of the number of passengers carried and the largest with destinations exclusively in the United States. Despite the restrictions on its home base (Dallas Love Field) since 1978, Southwest has built a successful business by flying multiple short quick trips into the secondary airports of major cities using primarily Boeing 737 aircraft.2 ATA Airlines is an American low cost and charter airline based in 1 “Chapter 11 is a chapter of the United States Bankruptcy Code which governs the process of reorganization under the bankruptcy laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]