Ree-2005-Evolution.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ree-2005-Evolution.Pdf EVOLUTION INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF EVOLUTION Vol. 59 February 2005 No. 2 Evolution, 59(2), 2005, pp. 257±265 DETECTING THE HISTORICAL SIGNATURE OF KEY INNOVATIONS USING STOCHASTIC MODELS OF CHARACTER EVOLUTION AND CLADOGENESIS RICHARD H. REE Department of Botany, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605 E-mail: rree@®eldmuseum.org Abstract. Phylogenetic evidence for biological traits that increase the net diversi®cation rate of lineages (key in- novations) is most commonly drawn from comparisons of clade size. This can work well for ancient, unreversed traits and for correlating multiple trait origins with higher diversi®cation rates, but it is less suitable for unique events, recently evolved innovations, and traits that exhibit homoplasy. Here I present a new method for detecting the phylogenetic signature of key innovations that tests whether the evolutionary history of the candidate trait is associated with shorter waiting times between cladogenesis events. The method employs stochastic models of character evolution and cladogenesis and integrates well into a Bayesian framework in which uncertainty in historical inferences (such as phylogenetic relationships) is allowed. Applied to a well-known example in plants, nectar spurs in columbines, the method gives much stronger support to the key innovation hypothesis than previous tests. Key words. Aquilegia, Bayesian inference, character mapping, diversi®cation rate, macroevolution, phylogeny. Received June 11, 2004. Accepted November 10, 2004. The tempo of evolution is a subject of general interest to al. 1988), plant latex and resin canals (Farrell et al. 1991), evolutionary biologists, from nucleotide mutation rates with- ¯oral nectar spurs (Hodges 1997), and ¯ower symmetry (Sar- in populations to the proliferation of branches on the tree of gent 2004). Alternatively, parametric approaches make it pos- life. At the macroevolutionary level, key innovation hypoth- sible to identify unusually large clades by ®tting data to pre- eses (Sanderson and Donoghue 1994) have been put forth to dictions of null models of stochastic cladogenesis, and this explain unusual disparities in species number between clades. can increase the statistical power associated with trait cor- A key innovation is commonly regarded as a biological trait relations (Slowinski and Guyer 1993; Sims and McConway that promotes lineage diversi®cation via mechanisms that in- 2003; McConway and Sims 2004). crease the rate of speciation and/or decrease the rate of ex- In contrast, it is more dif®cult to evaluate unique origins tinction (e.g., Hodges and Arnold 1995). (Hereafter, ``di- of key innovations. If a trait arises only once, distinguishing versi®cation'' will be used to convey the net change in clade its effect on diversi®cation from the effects of other, coin- diversity as a result of speciation and extinction.) Changes cidental, factors becomes problematic (see Discussion). De- in the rate of lineage diversi®cation are expected to leave an spite this, general methods for detecting shifts in diversi®- imprint in the phylogeny of the affected species, underscoring cation rate on phylogenies can be used to associate an inferred the importance of historical inference in studies of evolu- rate shift with the origin of the trait of interest. These use tionary innovations. stochastic branching models to evaluate the observed data, Key innovation hypotheses are most frequently studied by either the distribution of clade sizes on a phylogenetic tree correlation, which measures the degree to which multiple (e.g., Slowinski and Guyer 1989; Sanderson and Donoghue origins of a trait are associated with clades of unusual size. 1994; Sims and McConway 2003; McConway and Sims Correlations are appealing because they use phylogenetically 2004; Moore et al. 2004), or the distribution of the number independent datapoints, typically comparisons of sister of lineages through time (e.g., Nee et al. 1992, 1994; Paradis clades, to demonstrate a general, repeatable effect on diver- 1997). The dichotomy of approaches has led to them being sity by the candidate trait. Increasing the sample size in this termed topological and temporal methods, respectively (Chan way reduces the potential impact of other factors that affect and Moore 2002). diversi®cation rate. A popular approach has been to compare Key innovation tests based on topological data are ap- the relative sizes of sister groups using nonparametric sign pealing for a number of reasons. They are intuitive in that tests, for example, in studies of insect phytophagy (Mitter et shifts in diversi®cation rate will eventually lead to disparities 257 q 2005 The Society for the Study of Evolution. All rights reserved. 258 RICHARD H. REE in clade size. They are also pragmatic in generally requiring stochastic models of character evolution and cladogenesis in a minimum of taxon sampling in phylogenetic analyses, so continuous time. long as all relevant lineages are represented and the sizes of those lineages are known. Furthermore, they can be applied TESTING WHETHER CHARACTER EVOLUTION COVARIES WITH when no information about branch lengths is available DIVERSIFICATION RATE (Moore et al. 2004). However, methods for detecting rate shifts that rely solely on clade size data are not generally The test requires an estimate of the phylogeny of the spe- well-suited for cases in which the hypothesized key inno- cies of interest (i.e., those with the putative innovation) and their relatives. This can be a single tree, or it may be a set vation has arisen recently, with insuf®cient time having of trees representing plausible candidates (e.g., from boot- passed for the shift in diversi®cation rate to affect species strap replicates or Bayesian samples from the posterior dis- diversity to an extent that is statistically detectable. In these tribution of trees). For simplicity, consider ®rst the case of situations, they lose inferential power as a result of small a single tree. The terminal nodes on the tree are assumed to sample sizes. One exception to this is the so-called whole- represent extant species. Because we are interested in the tree approach (Chan and Moore 2002), which examines tree tempo of cladogenesis, the tree's branches should have symmetry in the context of a Markovian branching model lengths that are proportionate to time. A variety of statistical and can detect rate shifts even in small trees. tools are available for estimating the temporal durations of A potentially limiting aspect of all current key innovation branches from molecular sequence data, of which the simplest tests is their reliance on unreversed synapomorphies, mean- (and least often defensible) is to enforce the assumption of ing they tend to assume that once arisen, key innovations are a molecular clock (Felsenstein 1985; Hasegawa et al. 1985). never lost. While this may be a safe assumption when a trait However, while branch lengths should represent relative tem- is diagnostic of an entire clade, it is certainly reasonable to poral durations, they should be expressed in units of evo- expect cases in which key innovations are secondarily lost, lutionary change in the character of interest, such that the especially considering that the trait's adaptive value may be length of the tree is the total amount of change in the character contingent on a particular ecological setting or association expected over the whole phylogeny. that is transient (e.g., de Queiroz 2002). In theory, losses The steps involved in the test can be summarized as fol- provide additional information relevant to the key innovation lows. First, the history of the character of interest is mapped hypothesis, as they should be associated with decreases in on the tree, identifying partitions of the phylogeny over which diversi®cation rate just as gains are expected to cause in- the candidate trait was present and absent. Next, the number creases in rate. Thus, it is clearly desirable to have a phy- of branching events and relative time in each partition are logenetic method for testing key innovation hypotheses that used to estimate the difference in rates of diversi®cation be- accommodates bidirectional evolution in the trait of interest. tween character states. This difference in rates, averaged over A related problem with existing tests concerns their ten- alternative histories in proportion to their posterior proba- dency to rely on only the most parsimonious reconstructions bilities, is taken as the test statistic. Finally, the signi®cance of character change, that is, minimum-length solutions that of the test statistic is evaluated by generating its expected are known to be biased (see Harvey and Pagel 1991) and that density under a null model of waiting times between clad- also ignore the variance of the estimate (Nielsen 2002). His- ogenesis events. torical inference invariably introduces some uncertainty into Consider the two hypothetical phylogenies in Figure 1. considerations of character evolution, the magnitude of which Each has an identical binary character of which state 1 is depends on how much information we have about the past. hypothesized to be a key innovation. The trees have the same The increasing prevalence of Bayesian statistics and sto- topology, but differ in their branch lengths. By convention, chastic estimation methods is enabling uncertainty to be in- the tree topology is denoted t, the vector of branch lengths corporated into many aspects of phylogenetic inference (e.g., v, and the character data at the tips x. Given these data, the see Huelsenbeck et al. 2000). Here, the same approach is objective is to determine in each case whether a higher di- applied to the study of key innovations. versi®cation rate is associated with the history of state 1, the In summary, existing phylogenetic tests of key innovation candidate innovation, compared to state 0. Our ®rst clue to hypotheses are not ideal for studying singular instances, the outcome is found in the relative durations of terminal smaller clades, or traits that exhibit homoplasy.
Recommended publications
  • Species and Speciation
    Species and Speciation Objectives: • Understand the Biological Species Concept its strengths and its weaknesses. • Understand the types of information biologists use when delineating species, and the strengths and weaknesses of these different sources of information. • Understand the terms cryptic species and sexual dimorphism , and be able to give examples of each. • Understand the difference between anagenesis and cladogenesis . • Understand the terms adaptive radiation , niche and key innovation . • Understand the difference between prezygotic and postzygotic reproductive barriers. • Be familiar with the diversity of Darwin’s Finches and understand the relationship between diet and beak form in these birds. • Understand the mechanics of producing bird songs, and know the components of song structure. • Understand the relationship between beak form and song structure in Darwin’s Finches, and know what is meant by vocal deviation . • Understand the importance of song structure in mate recognition in Darwin’s Finches and understand the impact that changes in beak form may have in the maintenance of distinct species of Darwin’s Finches. • Be comfortable with using Excel to generate a graph. Important Note!! – Throughout this Lab you will be asked to open up documents on your computer. All of these may be found online (see the course website, then go to Lab Information). Introduction: In a previous lab, the focus was on A C B changes in allele frequencies within a population. This is evolution, but it represents anagenesis (or evolution within a single branch Anagenesis of an evolutionary tree). This week we will turn our focus towards cladogenesis (or the branching of an evolutionary tree to produce Cladogenesis new clades – e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Morphology, Innovation, and the Synthesis of Evolutionary and Developmental Biology
    Biology and Philosophy 18: 309–345, 2003. © 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Evolutionary Morphology, Innovation, and the Synthesis of Evolutionary and Developmental Biology ALAN C. LOVE Department of History and Philosophy of Science University of Pittsburgh CL 1017 Pittsburgh, PA 15260 U.S.A. E-mail: allst39@pitt.edu Abstract. One foundational question in contemporary biology is how to ‘rejoin’ evolution and development. The emerging research program (evolutionary developmental biology or ‘evo- devo’) requires a meshing of disciplines, concepts, and explanations that have been developed largely in independence over the past century. In the attempt to comprehend the present separation between evolution and development much attention has been paid to the split between genetics and embryology in the early part of the 20th century with its codification in the exclusion of embryology from the Modern Synthesis. This encourages a characterization of evolutionary developmental biology as the marriage of evolutionary theory and embryology via developmental genetics. But there remains a largely untold story about the significance of morphology and comparative anatomy (also minimized in the Modern Synthesis). Functional and evolutionary morphology are critical for understanding the development of a concept central to evolutionary developmental biology, evolutionary innovation. Highlighting the discipline of morphology and the concepts of innovation and novelty provides an alternative way of conceptualizing the ‘evo’ and the ‘devo’ to be synthesized. Key words: comparative anatomy, developmental genetics, embryology, evolutionary developmental biology, innovation, morphology, novelty, synthesis, typology 1. Introduction and methodology ... problems concerned with the orderly development of the individual are unrelated to those of the evolution of organisms through time ..
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Opportunity and the Origin of Adaptive Radiations
    doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02029.x REVIEW Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations J. B. YODER*, E. CLANCEY*, S. DES ROCHES*, J. M. EASTMAN ,L.GENTRY*, W. GODSOEà, T. J. HAGEY*, D. JOCHIMSEN*, B. P. OSWALD*, J. ROBERTSON*, B. A. J. SARVER*, J. J. SCHENK§, S. F. SPEAR– &L.J.HARMON* *Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA àNational Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennesee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA §Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA –Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA Keywords: Abstract adaptive radiation; Ecological opportunity – through entry into a new environment, the origin of density compensation; a key innovation or extinction of antagonists – is widely thought to link ecological opportunity; ecological population dynamics to evolutionary diversification. The popula- ecological release; tion-level processes arising from ecological opportunity are well documented macroevolution; under the concept of ecological release. However, there is little consensus as to natural selection. how these processes promote phenotypic diversification, rapid speciation and adaptive radiation. We propose that ecological opportunity could promote adaptive radiation by generating specific changes to the selective regimes acting on natural populations, both by relaxing effective stabilizing selection and by creating conditions that ultimately generate diversifying selection. We assess theoretical and empirical evidence for these effects of ecological opportunity and review emerging phylogenetic approaches that attempt to detect the signature of ecological opportunity across geological time. Finally, we evaluate the evidence for the evolutionary effects of ecological opportunity in the diversification of Caribbean Anolis lizards.
    [Show full text]
  • Nectar Spur Evolution in the Mexican Lobelias (Campanulaceae:Lobelioideae)1
    American Journal of Botany 92(3): 558±562. 2005. NECTAR SPUR EVOLUTION IN THE MEXICAN LOBELIAS (CAMPANULACEAE:LOBELIOIDEAE)1 MARGARET M. KOOPMAN2 AND TINA J. AYERS3 Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 5640, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011-5640 USA Phylogenetic studies are often hampered by the independent evolution of characters that may potentially obscure relationships. The adaptive signi®cance of the nectar spur and its evolution within the Mexican lobeliads (Campanulaceae) is considered here. The taxonomic delimitations of Heterotoma from the Mexican species within the genera Lobelia and Calcaratolobelia were tested. Inde- pendent molecular data were gathered to determine whether the Mexican spurred lobeliads should be treated as distinct genera. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region from 18±26S nuclear rDNA and chloroplast DNA from the 39 trnK intron were sequenced from 14 representative species. Our data suggest that Heterotoma, as originally conceived, is a good evolutionary unit within Lobelia and that the presence of a nectar spur is an important morphological character that can be used in de®ning phylogenetic position. This study also suggests that morphological changes associated with hummingbird pollination have evolved more than once in the Mexican lobeliads, from small blue-¯owered, insect-pollinated relatives. Key words: Heterotoma; ITS; Lobelia; nectar spur; pollination; systematics; 39 trnK intron. A fundamental objective in evolutionary biology is the ex- order for successful mutualisms to occur, pollinators need to amination and discovery of the causes and effects of species be both pro®cient in nectar harvesting and effective in polli- origin. The use of phylogenetic data to study the evolution of nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator Shifts, Contingent Evolution, and Evolutionary Constraint Drive
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.14030 Pollinator shifts, contingent evolution, and evolutionary constraint drive foral disparity in Salvia (Lamiaceae): Evidence from morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods Ricardo Kriebel,1,2 Bryan Drew,3 Jesús G. González-Gallegos,4 Ferhat Celep,5 Luciann Heeg,1 Mohamed M. Mahdjoub,6 and Kenneth J. Sytsma1 1Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2E-mail: rkriebel@wisc.edu 3Department of Biology, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, Nebraska 68849 4CONACYT, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR - Durango, Durango 34234, Mexico 5Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kırıkkale University, Yah¸siyan 71450, Turkey 6Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of Bouira, Bouira 10000, Algeria Received March 15, 2019 Accepted May 21, 2020 Switches in pollinators have been argued to be key drivers of foral evolution in angiosperms. However, few studies have tested the relationship between foral shape evolution and switches in pollination in large clades. In concert with a dated phylogeny, we present a morphometric analysis of corolla, anther connective, and style shape across 44% of nearly 1000 species of Salvia (Lamiaceae) and test four hypotheses of foral evolution. We demonstrate that foral morphospace of New World (NW) Salvia is largely distinct from that of Old World (OW) Salvia and that these differences are pollinator driven; shifts in foral morphology sometimes mirror shifts in pollinators; anther connectives (key constituents of the Salvia staminal lever) and styles co-evolved from curved to linear shapes following shifts from bee to bird pollination; and morphological differences between NW and OW bee fowers are partly the legacy of constraints imposed by an earlier shift to bird pollination in the NW.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbines: a Geographically Widespread Species Flock (Aquilegia/Adaptive Radiation/Molecular Evolution/Morphological Evolution/Ranunculaceae) Scotr A
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 5129-5132, May 1994 Evolution Columbines: A geographically widespread species flock (Aquilegia/adaptive radiation/molecular evolution/morphological evolution/Ranunculaceae) SCOTr A. HODGES* AND MICHAEL L. ARNOLD Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Communicated by John C. Avise, February 7, 1994 (receivedfor review January 7, 1994) ABSTRACT Species in the columbine genus, Aquilegia, clade(s) (9). Recent divergence among taxa will result in are known for their broad variation in ecology and floral lower levels of genetic variation within a clade as compared morphology. Aquilegia is also known for the large degree of to its sister clade. A similar pattern would result ifthere were intercompatibility among its species, which has led to the a slowdown in the accumulation of genetic change in the suggeston that the genus has arisen recently. However, inter- lineage of interest. However, tests of relative rates of diver- compatibility does not always imply recent divergence and the gence can be made by comparing the amounts of divergence widespread distribution pattern of the genus has suggested an since a common ancestor (10). In addition, concordance of older age. We constructed phylogenies for Aquilegia plus its patterns of divergence obtained from nuclear and cytoplas- cose relatives by using nucleotide sequence data from both mic genomes will provide stronger evidence for diversifica- nuclear and chloroplast DNA. The sequence data averaged tion patterns than simply using one of these genomes (10). over 1250 bp per species. Among the 14 columbine species To determine the relative recency of the diversification of sampled from Europe, Asia, and North America only 16-bp Aquilegia, we compared the degree of DNA sequence diver- changes and one insertion/deletion event were detected.
    [Show full text]
  • ADAPTIVE RADIATION Changes
    A contribute to the emergence of novel evolutionary ADAPTIVE RADIATION changes. Key Innovations ROSEMARY G. GILLESPIE Key innovations are, for example, adjustments in mor- University of California, Berkeley phology/physiology that are essential to the origin of new major groups, or features that are necessary, but not suf- Adaptive radiation is one of the most important out- fi cient, for a subsequent radiation. It appears that the new comes of the process of evolution, and islands are places trait can enhance the effi ciency with which a resource is where it is best observed. The term itself was fi rst used by H. F. Osborn in in describing parallel adapta- tions and convergence of species groups on different land masses. Since then, adaptive radiation has been widely recognized and defi ned in multiple ways to emphasize the contribution of key features thought to underlie the phenomenon, including adaptive change, speciation within a monophyletic lineage, and time. Dolph Schluter, a prominent researcher in the fi eld, defi nes it as “the evolution of ecological diversity within a rapidly multiplying lineage.” There are radiations that are not adaptive. These are mostly caused by changes in topography that, instead of opening up new habitats, have served simply to isolate a previously more widespread species. Island radiations are likely to include adaptive as well as non-adaptive evolu- tionary elements. In this article, the focus is on adaptive evolutionary radiations. FIGURE 1 Adaptive radiation of weevils, genus Cratopus (Coleoptera, FACTORS UNDERLYING ADAPTIVE RADIATION Curculionidae), on the small island of La Réunion. The southwest- The most widely recognized “trigger” for adaptive radi- ern Indian Ocean is a hotspot of terrestrial diversity and endemism.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergence, Convergence and Phenotypic Diversity of Neotropical Frugivorous Bats
    diversity Article Divergence, Convergence and Phenotypic Diversity of Neotropical Frugivorous Bats Oscar E. Murillo-García * ID and Maria E. De la vega Grupo de Investigación en Ecología Animal, Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 100-00, AA 25360, Cali 760001, Colombia; marivegaq@gmail.com * Correspondence: oscar.murillo@correounivalle.edu.co; Tel.: +57-2-321-2170 Received: 23 May 2018; Accepted: 29 August 2018; Published: 10 September 2018 Abstract: Knowing how adaptation shapes morphological evolution is fundamental to understanding the processes that promote biological diversity. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence on the effects of adaptive radiations on phenotypic diversity, which is related to processes that promote phenotypic divergence and convergence. We applied comparative methods to identify shifts in adaptive peaks and to detect divergence and convergence in skull morphology of frugivorous bats (Phyllostomidae: Stenodermatinae and Carollinae), an ecologically diverse group with strong association between skull morphology, feeding performance and diet that suggests adaptive diversification through morphological innovation. We found divergence and convergence for skull morphology. Fifteen peak shifts were found for jaws, which result in four convergent and four divergent regimes. For skull, nine peak shifts were detected that result in three convergent and three divergent regimes. Furthermore, convergence was significant and strong for skull morphology since distantly related organisms converged to the same adaptive optima. Results suggest that convergence indicates the effect of restriction on phenotypes to keep the advantages provided by the skull phenotype that played a central role in the evolution of strict frugivory in phyllostomids. We conclude that convergence has limited phenotypic diversity of functional traits related to feeding in phyllostomid frugivores.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lamiaceae): a Key Innovation for Adaptive Radiation?
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 4 (2004) 189–205 www.elsevier.de/ode The staminal lever mechanism in Salvia L. (Lamiaceae): a key innovation for adaptive radiation? Regine ClaXen-Bockhoffa,*, Thomas Speckb, Eniko¨ Twerasera, Petra Westera, Sascha Thimma, Martin Reithb a Institut fu¨r Spezielle Botanik und Botanischer Garten, Universita¨t Mainz, Germany b Plant Biomechanics Group, Botanischer Garten und Institut fu¨r Biologie II, Universita¨t Freiburg, Germany Received 21 July 2003; accepted 6 January 2004 Abstract Floral key innovations play a significant role in the discussion of adaptive radiation in plants. The paper brings together a brief review of morphological key innovations in plants, elucidating their evolutionary significance in flower–pollinator interactions, and new data on Salvia, a genus being examined as an example for presumed adaptive radiation. We hypothesize that the characteristic staminal lever mechanism functions as a key innovation. It is defined as a functional unit including the modification of stamens to lever-like structures, their reversible movement, and the organization of the remaining floral structures involved in the process of pollen transfer. We follow the assumption that structure and functioning of the staminal levers play a major role in the process of pollen deposition on the pollinator’s body, and that minute changes of both their proportions and their interactions with pollinators may have significant consequences for the pollination system. The functioning of the staminal lever mechanism is tested by field investigations, biomechanical experiments and pollination simulations. First results are presented, and possible modes of allopatric and sympatric speciation are discussed, based on morphometry of Salvia flowers and pollinators as well as on the operating mode of the staminal lever mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • How Traits Shape Trees: New Approaches for Detecting Character Statedependent Lineage Diversification
    doi: 10.1111/jeb.12460 REVIEW How traits shape trees: new approaches for detecting character state-dependent lineage diversification J. NG & S. D. SMITH Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA Keywords: Abstract anagenetic change; Biologists have long sought to understand the processes underlying dispari- ancestral state reconstruction; ties in clade size across the tree of life and the extent to which such clade BiSSE; size differences can be attributed to the evolution of particular traits. The character evolution; association of certain character states with species-rich clades suggests that cladogenetic change; trait evolution can lead to increased diversification, but such a pattern could directional trend; also arise due other processes, such as directional trait evolution. Recent diversification; advances in phylogenetic comparative methods have provided new statistical evolutionary dead end; approaches for distinguishing between these intertwined and potentially geographic range size; confounded macroevolutionary processes. Here, we review the historical key innovation. development of methods for detecting state-dependent diversification and explore what new methods have revealed about classic examples of traits that affect diversification, including evolutionary dead ends, key innovations and geographic traits. Applications of these methods thus far collectively suggest that trait diversity commonly arises through the complex interplay between transition, speciation and extinction rates and that long hypothe- sized evolutionary dead ends and key innovations are instead often cases of directional trends in trait evolution. species level and that evolutionary transitions in these Introduction traits result in fixed differences in net rates of diversifi- Disparities in clade size are common across the tree of cation (speciation minus extinction) (Jablonski, 2008; life at all scales, from recent radiations to deep diver- Rabosky & McCune, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87268-3 - Form and Function in Developmental Evolution Edited by Manfred D. Laubichler and Jane Maienschein Excerpt More information 1 Introduction ANDREW L. HAMILTON, MANFRED D. LAUBICHLER, AND JANE MAIENSCHEIN When philosopher of biology Michael Ruse moved from Guelph, Ontario, to Florida State University, a very good thing happened for our understanding of the conceptual, historical, and philosophical foundations of biology. Ruse became the William H. and Lucyle T. Werkmeister Professor, which brought with it an endowment that allowed him to organize conferences on a regular basis. As usual, Michael Ruse lost no time, and the resulting series of conferences has brought together biologists, historians, and philosophers in lively dis- cussion of a number of important topics. A favorite image of those events is that of Ernst Mayr, sitting in the boat during a swamp tour on a drowsy Florida afternoon. The aging but ever-intense Mayr seemed to be dozing, when suddenly he pointed and declared a noteworthy bird, then another, and another. That led to a discussion of whether bio- diversity is declining; then to philosophical questions about how we count diversity; and finally to ethical and policy questions of why we care. Other conferences have led to debates about science and religion. And so on. In 2005, a group of leading biologists joined philosophers and his- torians for four days of thinking about form and function. For this meeting, Ruse followed his usual approach. He provided the general theme, brought together a mix of enthusiastic scholars, and waited to see what happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Confluence, Synnovation, and Depauperons in Plant Diversification
    Review Tansley review Confluence, synnovation, and depauperons in plant diversification Author for correspondence: Michael J. Donoghue1 and Michael J. Sanderson2 Michael J. Donoghue 1 2 Tel: +1 203 432 2074 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, PO Box 208106, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Department of Email: michael.donoghue@yale.edu Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received: 14 October 2014 Accepted: 14 January 2015 Contents Summary 260 V. Obstacles to identifying synnovation, confluence, and depauperons 269 I. Introduction 260 VI. Conclusions 270 II. Lessons from the literature 261 Acknowledgements 270 III. New terms, new possibilities 265 References 270 IV. Rate heterogeneity and depauperons 268 Summary New Phytologist (2015) 207: 260–274 We review the empirical phylogenetic literature on plant diversification, highlighting challenges doi: 10.1111/nph.13367 in separating the effects of speciation and extinction, in specifying diversification mechanisms, and in making convincing arguments. In recent discussions of context dependence, key Key words: diversification, extinction rate, opportunities and landscapes, and indirect effects and lag times, we see a distinct shift away from phylogeny, radiation, speciation rate, vascular single-point/single-cause ‘key innovation’ hypotheses toward more nuanced explanations plants. involving multiple interacting causal agents assembled step-wise through a tree. To help crystalize this emerging perspective we introduce the term ‘synnovation’ (a hybrid of ‘synergy’ and ‘innovation’) for an interacting combination of traits with a particular consequence (‘key synnovation’ in the case of increased diversification rate), and the term ‘confluence’ for the sequential coming together of a set of traits (innovations and synnovations), environmental changes, and geographic movements along the branches of a phylogenetic tree.
    [Show full text]