Erschließung Genetischer Ressourcen Der Wiesenrispe Für Die Gräserzüchtung Durch Analyse Wichtiger Merkmalsausprägungen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Erschließung Genetischer Ressourcen Der Wiesenrispe Für Die Gräserzüchtung Durch Analyse Wichtiger Merkmalsausprägungen Aus dem Institut für Pflanzenzüchtung und Pflanzenschutz Direktor: Prof. Dr. habil. W.E. Weber der Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät Dekan: Prof. Dr. habil. P. Pickel der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Fachgebiet: Pflanzenzüchtung Erschließung genetischer Ressourcen der Wiesenrispe für die Gräserzüchtung durch Analyse wichtiger Merkmalsausprägungen Dissertation Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor agriculturarum (Dr. agr.) Von Diplomagraringenieur Kalina Andreeva Halle/Saale 2005 urn:nbn:de:gbv:3-000010379 [ http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn=nbn%3Ade%3Agbv%3A3-000010379] Aus dem Institut für Pflanzenzüchtung und Pflanzenschutz Direktor: Prof. Dr. habil. W.E. Weber der Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät Dekan: Prof. Dr. habil. P. Pickel der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Erschließung genetischer Ressourcen der Wiesenrispe für die Gräserzüchtung durch Analyse wichtiger Merkmalsausprägungen Dissertation Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor agriculturarum (Dr. agr.) vorgelegt von Diplomagraringenieur geb.am 17.11.1973 Kalina Andreeva in Burgas Gutachter: Prof. Dr. habil. A. Graner Prof. Dr. habil. W.E. Weber PD Dr. habil. A. Börner Verteidigung am: 16.01.2006 Halle/Saale 2005 urn:nbn:de:gbv:3-000010379 [http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn=nbn%3Ade%3Agbv%3A3-000010379] Inhaltverzeichnis 1 Einleitung...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Die Wiesenrispe Poa pratensis L. als Nutzgras und genetisches Objekt............................1 1.2 Diversitätsanalyse mittels Marker.....................................................................................3 1.3 Flow-cytometrischer Samen-Test ...................................................................................10 1.4 Berechnung der morphologischen und genetischen Diversität und graphische Darstellung der Ergebnisse................................................................................................................12 1.5 Populationsgenetische Methoden....................................................................................13 1.6 Ziel der Arbeit................................................................................................................13 2 Material und Methoden ..................................................................................................15 2.1 Pflanzenmaterial.............................................................................................................15 2.2 Bonitur auf züchterisch-relevante Merkmale...................................................................16 2.3 Molekulare Markeranalysen ...........................................................................................21 2.3.1 DNA-Extraktion und Quantifizierung..........................................................................21 2.3.2 AFLP-Analysen...........................................................................................................22 2.4 Durchflusszytometrie .....................................................................................................24 2.4.1 Ermittlung der Art der Samenbildung mittels durchflusszytometrischem Samentest ....25 2.4.2. Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung des Ploidiegrades ...................................................28 2.5. Statistische Auswertung der Ergebnisse.........................................................................29 2.5.1 Morphologisch-phänotypische Daten...........................................................................29 2.5.2 Daten zur Art der Samenbildung..................................................................................29 2.5.3. Daten zur Ploidiestufe.................................................................................................30 2.5.4 Molekulare Daten........................................................................................................30 2.5.5 Korrelationen zwischen den Datensätzen.....................................................................30 3 Ergebnisse........................................................................................................................31 3.1 Feldversuche ..................................................................................................................31 3.1.1 Morphologisch-phänotypische Diversität.....................................................................31 3.1.2 Umwelt .......................................................................................................................37 3.2 Ermittlung der Samenbildung.........................................................................................39 3.3 Ermittlung der Ploidiestufen...........................................................................................41 3.4 Zusammenhang zwischen DNA-Gehalt und morphologischen Merkmalen .....................44 3.5 AFLP-Untersuchungen bei Poa pratensis.......................................................................45 3.5.1 Untersuchungen basierend auf Poa pratensis-Einzelpflanzen.......................................47 3.5.2 Untersuchungen auf Herkunftsebene – Gendiversität innerhalb und zwischen den Ländern.......................................................................................................................48 3.5.3 Hierarchische Populationsstrukturen bei Poa pratensis ................................................52 3.6 Zusammenhang zwischen AFLP- und morphologischen Daten.......................................53 4 Diskussion........................................................................................................................55 4.1 Morphologisch-phänotypische Feldevaluierungen der Primär- und Sekundäranlage .......55 4.2 Einflüsse der Umwelt auf die Merkmalsausprägung .......................................................57 4.3 Ermittlung der Art der Samenbildung.............................................................................58 4.4 Untersuchungen zur Ploidiestufe ....................................................................................60 4.5 Zusammenhang DNA-Gehalt - morphologisch-phänotypische Merkmale.......................61 4.6 AFLP-Untersuchungen bei der Wiesenrispe ...................................................................62 4.6.1 Untersuchungen an Poa pratensis-Einzelpflanzen........................................................63 4.6.2 Gendiversität innerhalb und zwischen den Ländern, Populationsstrukturen..................63 4.7 Zusammenhang zwischen morphologisch-phänotypischen und AFLP-Daten..................69 5 Zusammenfassung/Summary..........................................................................................72 5.1 Zusammenfassung..........................................................................................................72 5.2 Summary........................................................................................................................74 6 Literaturverzeichnis........................................................................................................76 7 Anhang.............................................................................................................................89 Abkürzungsverzeichnis Abb. Abbildung AFLP amplified fragment length polymorphism AMOVA analysis of molecular variance ANOVA analysis of variance APS Ammoniumpersulfat bp Basenpaare °C Grad Celsius DAPI 4,6-diamino-2-phenolindol DNA Desoxiribonukleinsäure DNase Desoxyribonuklease dNTP desoxy-Nukleosidtripohosphat EDTA Ethylendiamin-N,N,N`,N`-tetraessigsäure h Stunde kb Kilobasenpaare mg Milligramm min Minute ml Milliliter µg Mikrogramm µl Mikroliter ng Nanogramm PAA Polyacrylamid PAGE Polyacrylamid-Gelelektrophorese PCR Polymerase-Ketten-Reaktion RAPD random amplified polymorphic DNA RFLP restriction fragment length polymorphism RNA Ribonukleinsäure RNase Ribonuklease rpm rotations per minute/ Umdrehungen pro Minute s Sekunde SNP single nucleotide polymorphism STS sequence tagged site SSR simple sequence repeat Tab. Tabelle TBE Tris, Borat, EDTA TEMED N,N,N´,N´-Tetramethylethylendiamin Tris Tris-hydroxymethyl-aminomethan U Unit (Einheit der Enzymaktivität) UPGMA Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean UPOV Union for the protection of new varieties of plants Abkürzungen der Länder (IPGRI, ISO 3166-1 Country Codes) BEL Belgien CHE Schweiz CSK Tschechoslowakei DEU Deutschland DNK Dänemark ESP Spanien EST Estland FIN Finnland FRA Frankreich GBR Großbritannien GRL Grönland HRV Bosnien-Herzegowina HUN Ungarn ISL Island ITA Italien LTU Litauen MNG Mongolei NLD Niederlande NOR Norwegen POL Polen PRT Portugal ROM Rumänien RUS Russland SUN Sowjetunion SVK Slowakische Republik SVN Slowenien SWE Schweden TUR Türkei YUG Jugoslawien Abbildungsverzeichnis Abbildung 1: Poa pratensis-Herkünfte im generativen Stadium......................................16 Abbildung 2: Schematische Darstellung der Versuchsanlage „Nachkommen-Diversität“ 19 Abbildung 3: Schematische Darstellung der Versuchsanlage „Nachkommen-Umwelt“...20 Abbildung 4: Aufbau eines Histogrammes: C-DNA-Gehalt im Embryo..........................26 Abbildung 5: Reproduktionswege bei Poa pratensis. ......................................................27 Abbildung 6: Durchflusszytometrische Auswertung des Ploidiegrades. ..........................28 Abbildung 7: Hauptkomponenten-Analyse der 928 Akzessionen polnischer Herkunft ....33 Abbildung 8: UPGMA-Phänogramme von 1583
Recommended publications
  • GENETICS, GENOMICS and BREEDING of FORAGE CROPS Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Crop Plants
    Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of About the Series Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of AboutAbout the the Series Series SeriesSeries on on BasicBasic and and advanced advanced concepts, concepts, strategies, strategies, tools tools and and achievements achievements of of Series on Basicgenetics, and advanced genomics concepts, and breeding strategies, of crops tools haveand beenachievements comprehensively of Genetics,Genetics, Genomics Genomics and and Breeding Breeding of of Crop Crop Plants Plants genetics,genetics, genomics genomics and and breeding breeding of ofcrops crops have have been been comprehensively comprehensively Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Crop Plants deliberateddeliberated in in30 30volumes volumes each each dedicated dedicated to toan an individual individual crop crop or orcrop crop Series Editor deliberatedgroup. in 30 volumes each dedicated to an individual crop or crop Series Series Editor Editor group.group. Chittaranjan Chittaranjan Kole, Kole, Vice-Chancellor, Vice-Chancellor, BC BC Agricultural Agricultural University, University, India India The series editor and one of the editors of this volume, Prof. Chittaranjan Chittaranjan Kole, Vice-Chancellor, BC Agricultural University, India TheThe series series editor editor and and one one of theof the editors editors of thisof this volume, volume, Prof. Prof. Chittaranjan Chittaranjan Kole,Kole, is globallyis globally renowned renowned for for his his pioneering pioneering contributions contributions in inteaching teaching and and Kole,research is globally for renowned nearly three for decades his pioneering on plant contributions genetics, genomics, in teaching breeding and and researchresearch for for nearly nearly three three decades decades on onplant plant genetics, genetics, genomics, genomics, breeding breeding and and biotechnology.biotechnology.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasses of the Texas Hill Country: Vegetative Key and Descriptions
    Hagenbuch, K.W. and D.E. Lemke. 2015. Grasses of the Texas Hill Country: Vegetative key and descriptions. Phytoneuron 2015-4: 1–93. Published 7 January 2015. ISSN 2153 733X GRASSES OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY: VEGETATIVE KEY AND DESCRIPTIONS KARL W. HAGENBUCH Department of Biological Sciences San Antonio College 1300 San Pedro Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212-4299 [email protected] DAVID E. LEMKE Department of Biology Texas State University 601 University Drive San Marcos, Texas 78666-4684 [email protected] ABSTRACT A key and a set of descriptions, based solely on vegetative characteristics, is provided for the identification of 66 genera and 160 grass species, both native and naturalized, of the Texas Hill Country. The principal characters used (features of longevity, growth form, roots, rhizomes and stolons, culms, leaf sheaths, collars, auricles, ligules, leaf blades, vernation, vestiture, and habitat) are discussed and illustrated. This treatment should prove useful at times when reproductive material is not available. Because of its size and variation in environmental conditions, Texas provides habitat for well over 700 species of grasses (Shaw 2012). For identification purposes, the works of Correll and Johnston (1970); Gould (1975) and, more recently, Shaw (2012) treat Texas grasses in their entirety. In addition to these comprehensive works, regional taxonomic treatments have been done for the grasses of the Cross Timbers and Prairies (Hignight et al. 1988), the South Texas Brush Country (Lonard 1993; Everitt et al. 2011), the Gulf Prairies and Marshes (Hatch et al. 1999), and the Trans-Pecos (Powell 1994) natural regions. In these, as well as in numerous other manuals and keys, accurate identification of grass species depends on the availability of reproductive material.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphrasia Vigursii.Pub
    Watsonia 26: 347–358 (2007) ECOLOGY OF EUPHRASIA VIGURSII 347 A fine scale study of selected environmental and floristic parameters in three populations of Euphrasia vigursii (Davey), a rare annual endemic to Devon and Cornwall L. GRANADOS1 and S. D. LANE2 School of Biological Science, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA ABSTRACT surveys have revealed only 25 active sites. This represents approximately 50% loss of localities Euphrasia vigursii is an endangered hemiparasitic in Cornwall mainly due to habitat destruction annual, endemic in Devon and Cornwall. This (French et al. 1999). In Devon there are only 2 investigation has evaluated fine scale patterns of sites, rediscovered in 1995 and 1998 and floristic composition and nutrient distribution in situated on the north-west perimeter of selected populations of E. vigursii in Devon and Cornwall to increase understanding of their ecology Dartmoor National Park. Ecologists at the for use in future management strategies in Devon. National Park aim to conserve and increase the Two particular questions were formulated: population of E. vigursii as part of the 1. Is E. vigursii immediately surrounded by other Dartmoor Biodiversity Action Plan, as it has particular plant species? been categorised in the priority list of the UK 2. If the soil was analysed in the direct location of steering group report on biodiversity as being the site of E. vigursii would the pH, Nitrogen, of ‘global conservation concern’ (HMSO Phosphorus and Potassium content be different from 1995). In order to establish a management the areas where E. vigursii is not present? strategy that would address the objectives of Phytosociological analysis indicated that E.
    [Show full text]
  • Clave Para La Identificacion De Gramineas Pratenses De Asturias
    Lagascalia 17(1): 37-57 (1993) CLAVE PARA LA IDENTIFICACION DE GRAMINEAS PRATENSES DE ASTURIAS R. GARCÍA SUÁREZ, J. A. FERNÁNDEZ PRIETO & M a C. FERNÁNDEZ-CARVAJAL ALVAREZ Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas. Universidad de Oviedo (Recibido el 26 de Febrero de 1991) Resumen. Se elabora una clave dicotómica para la identificación de gramíneas pratenses de Asturias, basada en caracteres morfológicos y anatómicos de hojas de innovaciones. Sumary. A dichotomous key is provided in order ro differentiate the grasses growing in meadows of Asturias, based on morfologic and anatomic characters of non-flowering shoots. INTRODUCCION En diversos tipos de estudios como, por ejemplo, los que tratan sobre los análisis de comunidades pratenses o sobre la alimentación de diversos vertebra- dos, resulta necesaria la identificación de gramíneas en estado fragmentario o en fase vegetativa pero, en cualquier caso, desprovistas de inflorescencias y flores, en cuyos caracteres se basan generalmente las claves al uso. Esta razón nos ha movido, fundamentalmente, a elaborar la presente clave basada en caracteres tanto morfológicos como anatómicos de los renuevos vegetativos. En una primera aproximación se han seleccionado las gramíneas más comu- nes en los prados y praderas asturianas, pensando en que posteriormente se comple- tará con las más raras o que aparecen en otras formaciones vegetales. MATERIAL Y METODOS Para la realización del presente trabajo se han utilizado ejemplares del Her- bario FCO y también, aunque en menor medida, material fresco. Se han llevado a cabo estudios tanto morfológicos como anatómicos en ho- jas de los renuevos vegetativos. En lo referente a los primeros se han considerado los caracteres que a conti- nuación se citan: 38 García Suárez al.: Clave gramíneas pratenses asturianas — Limbo: indumento de las caras abaxial y adaxial; márgenes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seed Plants, Ferns, and Fern Allies of the Austin Region
    University of Texas Bulletin No. 2065: November 20, 1920 The Seed Plants, Ferns, and Fern Allies of the Austin Region By Mary Sophie Young, Ph.D. PUBLISHED BY THB UNIVERSITY OF TBXAS AUSTIN : Publications of the University of Texas Publications Committee Frederic Duncalf C. T. Gray Killis Campbell E. J. Mathews D. B. Casteel C. E. Rowe F. W. Graff A. E. Trombly The University publishes bulletins six times a month, so numbered that the first two digits of the number show the year of issue, the last two the position in the yearly series. (For example, No. 1701 is the first bulletin of the year 1917.) These comprise the official publications of the University, publications on humanistic and scientific sub- jects, bulletins prepared by the Bureau of Extension, by the Bureau of Government Research, and by the Bureau of Eco- nomic Geology and Technology, and other bulletins of gen- eral educational interest. With the exception of special num- bers, any bulletin will be sent to a citizen of Texas free on request. All communications about University publications should be addressed to University Publications, University of Texas, Austin. 12-29-20-1357-6274-lm University of Texas Bulletin No. 2065: November 20, 1920 The Seed Plants, Ferns, and Fern Allies of the Austin Region By Mary Sophie ^ oung, Ph.D. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY SIX TIMES A MONTH, AND ENTERED AS] SECOND-CLASS MATTER AT THE POSTOFFICE AT AUSTIN. TEXAS. UNDBR THE ACT OF AUGUST 24, 1912 v i |1*o The benefits of education and of useful knowledge, generally diffused through a community, are essential to the preservation of a free govern- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Performance Summary for 'Liberator' Poa Pratensis
    Research and Performance Summary for ‘Liberator’ Poa pratensis Palouse Ridge, Pullman, WA, USA ‘Liberator’ Kentucky bluegrass (smooth Keene Manor, Lexington, KY, USA stalked meadow grass, Poa pratensis L.) has been an exceptional turf performer in the US since its release. Liberator has good color, density, disease resistance, and other attributes requisite of a top-performing variety. But three performance traits set it apart from other bluegrass varieties: (1) Prior to being registered in Europe, Liberator was tied for #1 in the US/Canada national turfgrass evaluation program (NTEP) trials. Liberator outscored 100 other varieties in the trial. When reentered in the new NTEP trial years later, Liberator went on to a subsequent page 1 finish. (2) The best and fastest Kentucky bluegrass for turfgrass sod production is Liberator. Liberator is a particular favorite of Check out the NTEP table where it was the turfgrass sod producers. The aggressive #1 commercial variety in sod strength, 2 underground rhizome system, proven in the NTEPs in a row: NTEP trials, assures quicker and easier lifting http://www.ntep.org/data/kb00/kb00_02 of turfgrass sod harvest. In China, sod farms in -1/kb0002t40.txt the Shijiazhuang area of Hebei Province, 2 (3) Liberator has exceptional salt tolerance, as hours south of Beijing, nearly all grown identified by numerous independent Liberator due to its excellent sod production research studies. Salt tolerance is characteristics. This area is a huge bluegrass important for areas were effluent water, sod production area (about 10,000 mu total), deicing salts, saline soils, or salty fertilizers and farmers in this area harvest bluegrass sod are used.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of North America North of Mexico
    Flora of North America North of Mexico Edited by FLORA OF NORTH AMERICA EDITORIAL COMMITTEE VOLUME 24 MagnoUophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Foaceae, part 1 Edited by Mary E. Barkworth, Kathleen M. Capéis, Sandy Long, Laurel K. Anderton, and Michael B. Piep Illustrated by Cindy Talbot Roché, Linda Ann Vorobik, Sandy Long, Annaliese Miller, Bee F Gunn, and Christine Roberts NEW YORK OXFORD • OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS » 2007 Oxford Univei;sLty Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York /Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto Copyright ©2007 by Utah State University Tlie account of Avena is reproduced by permission of Bernard R. Baum for the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Government of Canada, ©Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada, 2007. The accounts of Arctophila, Dtipontui, Scbizacbne, Vahlodea, xArctodiipontia, and xDiipoa are reproduced by permission of Jacques Cayouette and Stephen J. Darbyshire for the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Government of Canada, ©Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada, 2007. The accounts of Eremopoa, Leitcopoa, Schedoiioms, and xPucciphippsia are reproduced by permission of Stephen J. Darbyshire for the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Government of Canada, ©Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada, 2007. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Utah State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration Sources
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Pala Earctic G Rassland S
    Issue 46 (July 2020) ISSN 2627-9827 - DOI 10.21570/EDGG.PG.46 Journal of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group Dry Grassland of the Eurasian Journal PALAEARCTIC GRASSLANDS PALAEARCTIC 2 Palaearctic Grasslands 46 ( J u ly 20 2 0) Table of Contents Palaearctic Grasslands ISSN 2627-9827 DOI 10.21570/EDGG.PG46 Palaearctic Grasslands, formerly published under the names Bulletin of the European Editorial 3 Dry Grassland Group (Issues 1-26) and Bulletin of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (Issues 27-36) is the journal of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (EDGG). It usually appears in four issues per year. Palaearctic Grasslands publishes news and announce- ments of EDGG, its projects, related organisations and its members. At the same time it serves as outlet for scientific articles and photo contributions. News 4 Palaearctic Grasslands is sent to all EDGG members and, together with all previous issues, it is also freely available at http://edgg.org/publications/bulletin. All content (text, photos, figures) in Palaearctic Grasslands is open access and available under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0 that allow to re-use it provided EDGG Publications 8 proper attribution is made to the originators ("BY") and the new item is licensed in the same way ("SA" = "share alike"). Scientific articles (Research Articles, Reviews, Forum Articles, Scientific Reports) should be submitted to Jürgen Dengler ([email protected]), following the Au- Aleksanyan et al.: Biodiversity of 12 thor Guidelines updated in Palaearctic Grasslands 45: 4. They are subject to editorial dry grasslands in Armenia: First review, with one member of the Editorial Board serving as Scientific Editor and deciding results from the 13th EDGG Field about acceptance, necessary revisions or rejection.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vascular Plant Red Data List for Wales
    A Vascular Plant Red Data List for Wales A Vascular Plant Red Data List for Wales Rhestr o Blanhigion Fasgwlaidd Data Coch ar gyfer Cymru Rhestr o Blanhigion Fasgwlaidd Data Coch ar gyfer Cymru Dr Trevor Dines Plantlife Wales With the help of the Vice-county Recorders Plantlife International - The Wild Plant Conservation Charity and Committee of the Botanical Society of the 14 Rollestone Street, Salisbury Wiltshire SP1 1DX UK. British Isles in Wales, and the Countryside Telephone +44 (0)1722 342730 Fax +44 (01722 329 035 Council for Wales [email protected] www.plantlife.org.uk Plantlife International – The Wild Plant Conservation Charity is a charitable company limited by guarantee. Gyda chymorth Cofnodwyr yr is-siroedd a hefyd Registered Charity Number: 1059559 Registered Company Number: 3166339. Registered in England and Wales. Pwyllgor Cymreig y ‘Botanical Society of the Charity registered in Scotland no. SC038951. British Isles’ a Chyngor Cefn Gwlad Cymru © Plantlife International, June 2008 1 1 ISBN 1-904749-92-5 DESIGN BY RJPDESIGN.CO.UK RHESTROBLANHIGIONFASGWLAIDDDATACOCHARGYFERCYMRU AVASCULARPLANTREDDATALISTFORWALES SUMMARY Featured Species In this report, the threats facing the entire vascular plant flora of Wales have Two species have been selected to illustrate the value of producing a Vascular Plant been assessed using international criteria for the first time. Using data supplied Red Data List for Wales. by the Botanical Society of the British Isles and others, the rate at which species are declining and the size of remaining populations have been quantified in detail to provide an accurate and up-to-date picture of the state of vascular Bog Orchid (Hammarbya paludosa) plants in Wales.The production of a similar list (using identical criteria) for Least Concern in Great Britain but Endangered in Wales Great Britain in 2005 allows comparisons to be made between the GB and Welsh floras.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices, Glossary
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanice Est Scientia Naturalis Quae Vegetabilium Cognitiorem Tradit
    Number 17 January 16, 2001 A Newsletter for the flora An Inventory and Analysis of the Alien Plant Flora of New Mexico, from the Range Science Herbarium and of New Mexico Cooperative Extension Service, College of George W. Cox Agriculture and Home Biosphere and Biosurvival, 13 Vuelta Maria, Santa Fe, NM 87501 Economics, New Mexico State University. Abstract I summarized published information on non-native vascular plants recorded as established in the wild in New Mexico. Alien plants numbered 390 species and one additional hybrid form, with 13 spe- cies being represented by two or three alien subspecies. Alien plant species comprised 1 family and species of fern, 50 families and 270 species of Dicotyledons, and 5 families and 119 species of Mono- cotyledons. The families with most alien species were Poaceae, with 112, Asteraceae, with 43, Brassi- In This Issue — caceae, with 42, Fabaceae, with 22, and Chenopodiaceae, with 18. About 77.2 percent of alien species were of Eurasian origin, with 11.3 percent being from other parts of North America. Annual forbs, vines and grasses constituted 44.9 percent of the aliens, whereas trees and shrubs constituted 8.5 per- · New Mexico Exotics ..1 cent of alien species. Since publication of the first state flora, the number of alien plants has increased · Botanical Literature of from 136 in 1915 to 390 in 2000. The pattern of increase has been exponential, with about 6.75 new aliens appearing per year since 1980. Many other alien plants are present in neighboring states, and Interest ......................7 the potential for additional invasions is great.
    [Show full text]