DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Dissent in Soviet Belarus (1968-1988): Intelligentsia, Samizdat and Nonconformist Discourses'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Dissent in Soviet Belarus (1968-1988): Intelligentsia, Samizdat and Nonconformist Discourses' H-SHERA Gapova on Astrouskaya, 'Cultural Dissent in Soviet Belarus (1968-1988): Intelligentsia, Samizdat and Nonconformist Discourses' Review published on Wednesday, March 17, 2021 Tatsiana Astrouskaya. Cultural Dissent in Soviet Belarus (1968-1988): Intelligentsia, Samizdat and Nonconformist Discourses. Historische Belarus-Studien Series. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2019. 245 pp. $65.00 (paper), ISBN 978-3-447-11188-1. Reviewed by Elena Gapova (Western Michigan University) Published on H-SHERA (March, 2021) Commissioned by Hanna Chuchvaha (University of Calgary) Printable Version: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=55013 In Cultural Dissent in Soviet Belarus, Tatsiana Astrouskaya tells the story of the plight of nonconformist Belarusian intelligentsia during the last decades of Soviet rule. She focuses mostly on writers and literati who used to have a place of honor in Soviet society, where they enjoyed the status of public intellectuals and judges of truth and morality. This material has never been studied before; in general, Belarus has been considered a “voiceless” Soviet republic in terms of dissent (especially if compared with neighboring Ukraine and Lithuania). This new research problematizes this point of view, to a great extent demonstrating that the reason for this perspective might have been lack of published work on unconventional thinking in Belarus, not the absence of nonconformity. While one may not subscribe to the interpretations offered in the book in their entirety, much of what is said is compelling and sometimes even revealing, bringing to light a whole new layer of Belarusian cultural and intellectual history, and weaving together events, names, ideas, texts, and social connections. The book is a published doctoral dissertation (defended in 2018), which shows in its structure and general makeup. In Europe, at least in Germany, Sweden, and some other countries, there is an academic tradition of publishing dissertations as (first) books, which makes it possible to disseminate findings and insights as soon as they become available. However, some (smaller) academic publishers, while professional in dealing with oeuvres in their national languages, do not have personnel and resources to prepare works in English, and this is the case with the book under discussion. Errors in English grammar and syntax are abundant and sometimes hamper making sense of what the author means in a particular sentence. I am bringing this technical complaint up front to have my hands free of it to focus on the work’s ideas and interpretations in the rest of the review. The book has 1968—the liminal year of the Prague Spring—in its title: in the former socialist bloc, the date symbolizes both the hopes and the demolition of post-Stalinist liberalization. However, Astrouskaya starts her story much earlier, beginning with the period still under Russian imperial rule. Chapter 2 (“The Intelligentsia, Official and Uncensored Publishing: A Historical Background”), which follows the introduction (chapter 1) explaining research questions, methodology, and sources, provides a much longer historical line. It goes all the way from the partition of Poland of 1772 (when Belarusian lands were first incorporated into the Russian Empire) through the nineteenth century, Citation: H-Net Reviews. Gapova on Astrouskaya, 'Cultural Dissent in Soviet Belarus (1968-1988): Intelligentsia, Samizdat and Nonconformist Discourses'. H-SHERA. 03-17-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/166842/reviews/7438614/gapova-astrouskaya-cultural-dissent-soviet-belarus-1968-1988 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-SHERA the revolution of 1917, the Soviet period, with a glimpse of Belarusian intellectual life in Western Belarus (then a part of Poland) between the two world wars, World War II, and the first decade after it. This historical background is supposed to set the stage for what comes later, affirming the issue of writing and publishing in the Belarusian language as the key form of cultural dissent (more on this below). Chapters 3 to 6 cover the post-Stalinist period. They present in some detail the life trajectories of several outstanding national literati born before World War II (Maksim Tank, Vasil Bykau, and Uladzimir Karatkevich, to name the most prominent ones), pay special attention to cultural politics during “developed socialism,” and celebrate initiatives and projects that surfaced during perestroika. The author carefully considers samizdat and uncensored publications of the period and casts a brief glance at intelligentsia’s reaction to anti-Semitism and the Chernobyl nuclear disaster of 1986. Eventually, the story reaches the lifting of censorship and transition to free media during perestroika. The book also includes appendices with tables of relevant publications and lists of renowned intellectuals belonging to several generations detailing their dates of birth, social origin, education, Communist Party membership, and other relevant data. This material will be especially important for future researchers of Belarusian intellectual history. The focus of the book is on cultural dissent. While no concrete definition of “dissent” is provided, it can be adequately described, with few exceptions, through the concept ofraznomyslie or “the diversity of thinking.” Introduced some fifteen years ago by the Russian sociologist Boris Firsov (Diversity of Thinking in the USSR, 1940s-1960s: History, Theory and Practices [2008]) in relation to post-Stalinist Soviet intelligentsia, it denotes an array of practices and forms of expression that should not be considered as political protest acts per se but rather as the realization of intellectual autonomy. In its discussion of raznomyslie, the book follows two paths: on the one hand, it considers unconventional ideas that penetrated official literature; and on the other, it analyzes (attempts of) periodical and non-periodical samizdat (samvydat, in Belarusian) and tamizdat (foreign publications), and some other forms of nonconformist intellectualism. Astrouskaya intends to demonstrate that dissident ideas did not spread unidirectionally from the center to the periphery but to prioritize “the multi-directionality of cultutal relationships” (p. 5). However, socialist dissent—the topic (and the very word)—is a charged subject. There is a certain tradition, a preconceived context, coming out of the Cold War in which it originated, and its preexistence may “tint” more current perspectives with connotations that are not easy to disentangle. Thus, when writing about dissent in the former socialist bloc there is a temptation to succumb to the well-established and still popular binary paradigm of “totalitarianism” versus “freedom.” Astrouskaya seeks to embrace a more complex approach by recognizing that one could be a part of the system yet still have a critical view of it. Assuming that “the meandering between collaboration and resistance” was characteristic of socialist intelligentsia throughout the region, she excapes from justapositions and arrives, wisely, at more nuanced interpretations of relationships and “negotiations” between intellectual elites and Soviet authorities (p. 2). She writes about the blurriness of dissent and official belonging, or, in her own words, “paradoxical compromise” (p. 89). This compromise deserves some attention. Many recognized intellectuals of the older generation (born before World War II) used to be Communist Party members. Vasyl Bykau, the most prominent of them, was in the 1980s a deputy of the Supreme Soviet and a recipient of the Lenin Prize in Citation: H-Net Reviews. Gapova on Astrouskaya, 'Cultural Dissent in Soviet Belarus (1968-1988): Intelligentsia, Samizdat and Nonconformist Discourses'. H-SHERA. 03-17-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/166842/reviews/7438614/gapova-astrouskaya-cultural-dissent-soviet-belarus-1968-1988 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-SHERA literature, the highest Soviet award. His works were translated into all (or most) national languages of the USSR and were published extensively with print runs that would be unthinkable in the current market economy. As a recognized writer and a Soviet “envoy,” he traveled the world. At the same time, intelligentsia (rightly) considered him a “rebel,” a person who “told the truth” about the real human price of Soviet victory in World War II and terrible choices one had to make in the war zone. The question is how to explain this paradox (in the Weberian sense ofverstehen or “interpretative sociology”), which, in the long run, is a question about sincerity and truth. Being a part of the system, did socialist intellectuals lie? Or could they sincerely believe in what they were doing on behalf of the system? Questions like these can have meaningful answers if one recognizes that socialism was not necessarily “evil” (as it is often presented) in the eyes of the people who were a part of it: Bykau’s generation considered their country to be on the “right side of history” in its anti-fascist struggle and in some other historical events as well. Suffice it to say that most Soviet Belarusian writers addressed the events of World War II in one way or another in their work, as Belarusians lost one-fourth of their population (the highest ratio in the world) in that conflict. This background matters for any discussion of the period. However, treating World War II (or,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Death Penalty in Belarus
    Part 1. Histor ical Overview The Death Penalty in Belarus Vilnius 2016 1 The Death Penalty in Belarus The documentary book, “The Death Penalty in Belarus”, was prepared in the framework of the campaign, “Human Rights Defenders against the Death Penalty in Belarus”. The book contains information on the death penalty in Belarus from 1998 to 2016, as it was in 1998 when the mother of Ivan Famin, a man who was executed for someone else’s crimes, appealed to the Human Rights Center “Viasna”. Among the exclusive materials presented in this publication there is the historical review, “A History of The Death Penalty in Belarus”, prepared by Dzianis Martsinovich, and a large interview with a former head of remand prison No. 1 in Minsk, Aleh Alkayeu, under whose leadership about 150 executions were performed. This book is designed not only for human rights activists, but also for students and teachers of jurisprudence, and wide public. 2 Part 1. Histor ical Overview Life and Death The Death penalty. These words evoke different feelings and ideas in different people, including fair punishment, cruelty and callousness of the state, the cold steel of the headsman’s axe, civilized barbarism, pistol shots, horror and despair, revolutionary expediency, the guillotine with a basket where the severed heads roll, and many other things. Man has invented thousands of ways to kill his fellows, and his bizarre fantasy with the methods of execution is boundless. People even seem to show more humanness and rationalism in killing animals. After all, animals often kill one another. A well-known Belarusian artist Lionik Tarasevich grows hundreds of thoroughbred hens and roosters on his farm in the village of Validy in the Białystok district.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediation of the Concept of Civil Society in the Belarusian Press (1991-2010)
    THE MEDIATION OF THE CONCEPT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE BELARUSIAN PRESS (1991-2010) A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 IRYNA CLARK School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures ............................................................................................... 5 List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 6 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 7 Declaration ....................................................................................................................... 8 Copyright Statement ........................................................................................................ 8 A Note on Transliteration and Translation .................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 11 Research objectives and questions ................................................................................... 12 Outline of the Belarusian media landscape and primary sources ...................................... 17 The evolution of the concept of civil society
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Space: the Cases of Belarus and Ukraine Goujon, Alexandra
    www.ssoar.info Nationalism in the Soviet and post-Soviet space: the cases of Belarus and Ukraine Goujon, Alexandra Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Arbeitspapier / working paper Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Goujon, A. (1999). Nationalism in the Soviet and post-Soviet space: the cases of Belarus and Ukraine. (Arbeitspapiere des Osteuropa-Instituts der Freien Universität Berlin, Arbeitsschwerpunkt Politik, 22). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, Osteuropa-Institut Abt. Politik. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-440316 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference Crimes of the Communist Regimes, Prague, 24–25 February 2010
    International conference Crimes of the Communist Regimes an assessment by historians and legal experts proceedings Th e conference took place at the Main Hall of the Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic (24–25 February 2010), and at the Offi ce of the Government of the Czech Republic (26 February 2010) Th e publication of this book was kindly supported by the European Commission Representation in the Czech Republic. Th e European Commission Representation in the Czech Republic bears no responsibility for the content of the publication. © Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes, 2011 ISBN 978-80-87211-51-9 Th e conference was hosted by Jiří Liška, Vice-chairman of the Senate, Parliament of the Czech Republic and the Offi ce of the Government of the Czech Republic and organized by the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes together with partner institutions from the working group on the Platform of European Memory and Conscience under the kind patronage of Jan Fischer Prime minister of the Czech Republic Miroslava Němcová First deputy chairwoman of the Chamber of Deputies, Parliament of the Czech Republic Heidi Hautala (Finland) Chairwoman of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the European Parliament Göran Lindblad (Sweden) President of the Political Aff airs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and chairman of the Swedish delegation to PACE Sandra Kalniete (Latvia) former dissident, Member of the European Parliament Tunne Kelam (Estonia) former dissident, Member of the European Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • Review–Chronicle
    REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 Human Rights Center Viasna ReviewChronicle » of the Human Rights Violations in Belarus in 2005 VIASNA « Human Rights Center Minsk 2006 1 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 » VIASNA « Human Rights Center 2 Human Rights Center Viasna, 2006 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 INTRODUCTION: main trends and generalizations The year of 2005 was marked by a considerable aggravation of the general situation in the field of human rights in Belarus. It was not only political rights » that were violated but social, economic and cultural rights as well. These viola- tions are constant and conditioned by the authoritys voluntary policy, with Lu- kashenka at its head. At the same time, human rights violations are not merely VIASNA a side-effect of the authoritarian state control; they are deliberately used as a « means of eradicating political opponents and creating an atmosphere of intimi- dation in the society. The negative dynamics is characterized by the growth of the number of victims of human rights violations and discrimination. Under these circums- tances, with a high level of latent violations and concealed facts, with great obstacles to human rights activity and overall fear in the society, the growth points to drastic stiffening of the regimes methods. Apart from the growing number of registered violations, one should men- Human Rights Center tion the increase of their new forms, caused in most cases by the development of the state oppressive machine, the expansion of legal restrictions and ad- ministrative control over social life and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Weiss. Andrei Platonov. Ragnvald Blix. Georg Henrik Von Wright. Adam Michnik
    A quarterly scholarly journal and news magazine. March 2011. Vol IV:1 From the Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES) Södertörn University, Stockholm FEATURE. Steklov – Russian BALTIC temple of pure thought W O Rbalticworlds.com L D S COPING WITH TRANSITIONS PETER WEISS. ANDREI PLATONOV. RAGNVALD BLIX. GEORG HENRIK VON WRIGHT. ADAM MICHNIK. SLAVENKA DRAKULIĆ. Sixty pages BETRAYED GDR REVOLUTION? / EVERYDAY BELARUS / WAVE OF RELIGION IN ALBANIA / RUSSIAN FINANCIAL MARKETS 2short takes Memory and manipulation. Transliteration. Is anyone’s suffering more important than anyone else’s? Art and science – and then some “IF YOU WANT TO START a war, call me. Transliteration is both art and science CH I know all about how it's done”, says – and, in many cases, politics. Whether MÄ author Slavenka Drakulić with a touch царь should be written as tsar, tzar, ANNA of gallows humor during “Memory and czar, or csar may not be a particu- : H Manipulation: Religion as Politics in the larly sensitive political matter today, HOTO Balkans”, a symposium held in Lund, but the question of the transliteration P Sweden, on December 2, 2010. of the name of the current president This issue of the journal includes a of Belarus is exceedingly delicate. contribution from Drakulić (pp. 55–57) First, and perhaps most important: in which she claims that top-down gov- which name? Both the Belarusian ernance, which started the war, is also Аляксандр Лукашэнка, and the Rus- the path to reconciliation in the region. sian Александр Лукашенко are in use. Balkan experts attending the sympo- (And, while we’re at it, should that be sium agree that the war was directed Belarusian, or Belarussian, or Belaru- from the top, and that “top-down” is san, or Byelorussian, or Belorussian?) the key to understanding how the war BW does not want to take a stand on began in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Revanchist Russia? Russian Perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian Sovereignty, 1990-2008
    1 Revanchist Russia? Russian Perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian Sovereignty, 1990-2008 Rasmus Nilsson UCL For the degree of PhD 2 I, Rasmus Nilsson, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 Abstract The theme of this thesis concerns post-Soviet Russian foreign policy perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty between 1990 and 2008. In the thesis I argue that Russian perceptions became increasingly revanchist in nature during this period, and that we may distinguish between two different types of revanchism, the consequences of which for Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty are quite different. I argue that all Russian perceptions of international affairs are constituted by perceptions of Russia. Thus, perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty may be divided into three categories, or paradigms, each of which centres on a specific concept that legitimises the existence of Russia, and determines how Belarus and Ukraine are viewed. The three central concepts are the concepts of Law, Power, and Nation, respectively. In the introduction, I outline these paradigms, both in abstract terms and in relation to Russian foreign policy in general, as well as Russian foreign policy towards Belarus and Ukraine. Subsequently, I present my methodology and my literature review, together with a discussion of the theoretical assumptions, which provide the foundation for my argument. Then, I briefly outline Russian foreign policy making during the period relevant for my thesis, before the four main chapters of my thesis outline in roughly chronological fashion how the relative significance of the three paradigms has changed over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus Will Soon Be Liberated
    Belarus Will Soon Be Liberated INTERVIEW WITH STANISLAU SHUSHKEVICH tanislau Shushkevich, a nuclear physicist by training, is currently the chair- S man of the Hramada party. He was chairman of the Supreme Soviet and head of state of Belarus, from 1991 to 1994. During this time, he presided over the sum- mit attended by leaders of the three Slavic Soviet republics in early December 1991 at the Belovezhsky Forest. This summit brought about the decision to dissolve the USSR. As the leader of an independent Belarus, Shushkevich oversaw the trans- fer of the nuclear weapons in Belarusian territory to Russia, the construction of basic institutions of state, and economic and political reforms—despite inheriting a legislature overwhelmingly dominated by the communist nomenklatura. Since the reestablishment of a dictatorship that followed his fall from power in 1994, Shushkevich has become active in opposition politics and dissidence and has attempted to unify the democratic opposition to the Alyaksandr Lukashenka regime. In November 2003, Shushkevich was in Washington, D.C. and Toronto to participate in two panels organized by the American Enterprise Institute and the University of Toronto, respectively, in honor of ten years of Demokratizatsiya. In this interview, Shushkevich speaks about possible paths to liberation, the unifying of the opposition, Russia’s meddling, the West’s indifference, and possible reform models for a free Belarus. He also reminisces about the summit at the Belovezh- sky Forest, meetings at Novo-Ogarevo, and teaching Russian to Lee Harvey Oswald in Minsk. This interview was conducted in Toronto on November 22, 2003, and translated by Demokratizatsiya founder Fredo Arias-King.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation-Building in the Former USSR Journal: Journal of Democracy 1996; 7(1), 118-132
    1 Author: Pål Kolstø Title: Nation-building in the Former USSR Journal: Journal of Democracy 1996; 7(1), 118-132 The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Journal of Democracy 1996, 7(1), 118-132 Link to journal http://www.journalofdemocracy.org/ Link to publisher Johns Hopkins http://www.press.jhu.edu/ 2 NATIONBUILDING IN EURASIA Pål Kolstø, University of Oslo Seemingly, fifteen new states were established in Eurasia in 1991 after the demise of Communism in the Soviet Union. However, a 'state' in the full sense of the word does not come about simply by a political proclamation of independence, still not by international recognition. A true state must have control of its own frontiers, a monopoly of coercive powers on its territory, be able to collect tolls and taxes, etc. To carry out these tasks a modicum of administrative apparatus is needed, as well as a broad consensus in society of the rules and routines for how the jobs shall be done. In the fall of 1991 these preconditions were generally not fulfilled in any of the Soviet successor states. The armed forces on their territories and the levers of economic policy were beyond the control of the new state authorities. There also were no border defence systems between the new states, indeed, state borders were not even delineated in the terrain. For these reasons it is more appropriate to say that on New Year's Day 1992 the groundwork for the building of fifteen new states in Eurasia were laid. The establishment of governmental institutions and other state attributes is a prolonged process which will continue for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Wars, Soul-Searching, and Belarusian Identity Grigory Ioffe East European Politics and Societies 2007; 21; 348 DOI: 10.1177/0888325407299790
    East European Politics & Societies http://eep.sagepub.com Culture Wars, Soul-Searching, and Belarusian Identity Grigory Ioffe East European Politics and Societies 2007; 21; 348 DOI: 10.1177/0888325407299790 The online version of this article can be found at: http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/21/2/348 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: American Council of Learned Societies Additional services and information for East European Politics & Societies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://eep.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Downloaded from http://eep.sagepub.com by Grigory Ioffe on August 20, 2007 © 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized distribution. Culture Wars, Soul-Searching, and Belarusian Identity Grigory Ioffe* Attaching political labels to a situation whose roots transcend politics con- stitutes a critical weakness of Western policies vis-à-vis Belarus. The con- temporary nationalist discourse in Belarus allows one to discern three “national projects,” each being a corpus of ideas about Belarus “the way it should be”: (1) Nativist/pro-European, (2) Muscovite liberal, and (3) Creole. While the projects’ nametags are debatable, the trichotomy is a useful abstrac- tion, as it reflects the lines of force in the “magnetic field” of Belarusian nationalism. The article analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of each pro- ject, cultural wars between them, the role of a civilizational fault line that runs across Belarus and the attendant geopolitical divisions that underlie multiplicity of national projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandra Goujon Nationalism in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Space
    Alexandra Goujon Nationalism in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Space : the cases of Belarus and Ukraine 22/1999 Alexandra Arbeitspapiere des Osteuropa- Goujon Instituts der Freien Universität Berlin Arbeitsbereich Politik und Gesellschaft Nationalism in the Soviet and post-Soviet Space: the cases of Belarus and Ukraine Heft 22/1999 © 1999 by Graham Stack Osteuropa-Institut der Freien Universität Berlin Arbeitsbereich Politik und Gesellschaft Herausgeber: Klaus Segbers Redaktion: Simon Raiser ISSN 1434 – 419X 1 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Soviet Republics and Popular Fronts 5 1.2 Political culture and socialisation 6 2 THEORETICAL APPROACHES 7 3 NATIONALISM : THREE WAYS OF FUNCTIONING 10 3.1 Nationalism and social relations 11 3.1.1 Popular Fronts and Intellectual Networks 11 3.1.2 Popular Fronts and Social Representation 13 3.1.3 Nation-building and Social Development 15 3.2 Nationalism and nationality 17 3.2.1 Popular Fronts and National Ideology 17 3.2.2 Etnos theory, Nation and Nationality 20 3.2.3 State-building and citizenship 21 3.3 Nationalism and construction of political spaces 22 3.3.1 Popular Fronts and political changes 22 3.3.2 Popular Fronts in new political systems 24 3.3.3 Belarus and Ukraine : two distinct political spaces 25 4 NATIONALISM AND GLOBALIZATION 27 BIBLIOGRAPHY 29 1 Introduction1 Since the Perestroika period, the study of nationalism in Soviet and post-Soviet space has become increasingly important. However, Popular Fronts (PF), which were leading national events in each of the Soviet republics in the late 1980s, were not so much investigated, notably because they were not the main actors in the achievement of independence and in the nation- and state-building process which followed it.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus: to Democracy Through Neo-Communism 63 Media, Yet He Never Imprisoned Any Journalists for That
    Belarus : To Democracy through Neo-Communism STANISLAU SHUSHKEVICH ince the Belarus presidential elections of 1994, there have been numerous S attempts to impose on the Belarusian public the notion that only strengthened and centralized rule will make acceleration of the progressive reforms possible. The obvious inconsistencies of the chosen ruler's actions have been justified by citing the difficulties of finding acceptable means for reform and the notorious complexities of the transition period in this former Soviet republic that only recent- ly was relatively prosperous. The difficulties have been further exacerbated in Belarus by a significantly higher concentration (than in the other CIS states) of military and retirees, the majority of whom are opposed to any transformation. Seasoned Western diplomats and various emissaries of parliaments and gov- ernments of the democratic states, as well as of the all-European institutions, have insistently advised the Belarusian opposition to search for ways of tactful influ- ence over the insufficiently enlightened president, assuming that even he can be convinced of the necessity of following the path of transformation to a lawful democratic state respecting values common to all humankind. However, the chosen leader's lust for power and his desire to reign (as opposed to govern) have only grown stronger. His sentiments have been accepted and sup- ported by the old communist nomenklatura of both Belarus and Russia, as it became clear that, thanks to his purely Soviet-style education (Department of History of a provincial pedagogic institute and a military school of political instructors), Alexan- der Lukashenka would indeed resurrect the Soviet "communist" kind of order.
    [Show full text]